UFOs are flying back into the news…, again!

This seems to be a growing trend.  And most of the news has been coming directly from the government or the military…, which is quite unusual.

Typically they are the ones denying this or denying that, or just refusing to comment altogether.

So what’s going on?

According to Sam Dorman of Fox News, “The Defense Department reportedly briefed Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner, D-Va., on Wednesday, along with two other senators as part of what appeared to be heightened efforts to inform politicians about naval encounters with unidentified aircraft.”

ufos 2

This is highly unusual!  The Defense Department initiating briefings and volunteering information!  Unheard of!

“As part of a program investigating the issue, Navy personnel reportedly told Pentagon officials that they encountered aircraft that appeared to ‘defy the laws of physics and aerodynamics while in military airspace.’”

ufos 5

“Navy strike group pilots also reported seeing strange objects flying above 30,000 feet at hypersonic speeds with no visible engine or infrared exhaust fumes, according to the New York Times.”

ufos 3

These comments don’t leave much room for doubt, do they?  The Navy is obviously beginning the process of covering its backside, because they don’t know what else to do at this point.

“Asked if he knew if there was evidence of extraterrestrial life, President Trump said: ‘I think our great pilots would know. And some of them see things a little bit different from the past. We’re watching, and you’ll be the first to know.’”

“Christopher Mellon, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, has said that the U.S. knew UFOs existed. ‘We know that UFOs exist. This is no longer an issue,’ he said. ‘The issue is why are they here, where are they coming from, and what is the technology behind these devices that we are observing?’”

ufos 1

This is a “former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence” saying this.

As I have discussed in previous blogs, if these things are extraterrestrial in nature, we’re dealing with beings that are FAR more advanced than we are.

If we’re dealing with UFOs that have earthly origins, from other countries, then we are in big trouble as well…, because we obviously are lagging far behind someone technology-wise.

ufos 4

Stay tuned.  I’ll keep you posted on the whole subject of UFOs as more information comes out.

The truth is out there…, and it’s getting closer all the time.

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Welcome to “The Peoples Racism Court!” Better known as the TV show, “The View.”

The hosts of “The View” are apparently the official arbiters of who is and who is not a racist in this country.

Sam Dorman of Fox News reported that, ‘“The View’ hosts defend Joe Biden from Dem attacks, say there’s a ‘real racist in the White House.’”

‘“The View’ hosts on Thursday pushed back on race-based criticisms of former Vice President Joe Biden, suggesting that by calling him a ‘racist,’ people were trivializing real racism in the White House.”

‘“Joe Biden is not a racist, and I would never call him a racist especially when I believe we have a true racist sitting in the White House,’ host Sunny Hostin said, receiving support from co-hosts Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar.”

race 10

So you would “NEVER” call Biden a racist…, huh, Sunny…, huh, Whoopi…, huh, Joy?

But we have a “true racist” in The White House though?

racist

And we all know why this is the case per you and your friends…, BECAUSE JOE BIDEN IS A DEMOCRAT, A LIBERAL, AND A CARD CARRYING, LIFETIME, MEMBER OF ‘THE SWAMP!”

Joe Biden could run around Washington D.C. calling every black person he saw the “N word,” and he would get a free racism pass.

reps 10

And what is it exactly that President Trump said or did that earned him the title of a “true racist?”

Hmmm?

Go ahead…, talk amongst yourselves…, I’ll wait.

Still waiting…

Still waiting…

Oh, well…, get back to me when you actually come up with something…, I won’t hold my breath!

race 7

“Goldberg, who grew up during the civil rights era, implied it was ridiculous to call Biden a racist and defended him for working with segregationists as a senator. ‘There are real racists out there,’ she exclaimed.”

You’re such a phony, and a hypocrite, Whoopi.

It’s just as “ridiculous” to call President Trump a racist, and you know it.

“She went on to tell Biden’s competitors to beat him in debates but not to call him a racist. ‘You can’t call the dude a racist. He sat for eight years with a black guy,’ she said, referring to former President Barack Obama.”

And she doesn’t even realize how much of a racist she sounds like.

race 3

race 2

race 1

race 6

race 5

race 8

Only a racist constantly sees things through the eyes of a racial perspective…, black or white.

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

“Reparations?!”  What you talkin’ ‘bout Willis?!

Ooops…, I mean Sheila, and Corey, and Kamala!

Adam Shaw of Fox News reported that, “The question of slavery reparations for black Americans was the subject of a fiery and emotional House Judiciary Committee hearing Wednesday as Democrats called for measures to address America’s ‘original sin’ — while Republicans described such payments as an ‘injustice’ and ‘almost certainly unconstitutional.’”

“The Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties subcommittee held the hearing on H.R. 40 — a bill by Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee, D-Texas, to set up a commission to study and develop a response to the question of reparations for slavery.”

reps 4

‘“The role of the federal government in supporting the institution of slavery and subsequent discrimination directed against blacks is an injustice that must be formally acknowledged and addressed,’ Jackson-Lee said.”

I believe slavery, injustice and discrimination have been addressed by our government, Ms. Jackson-Lee.  I believe our government and our country has evolved quite well since the mid-1800s.

‘“I just simply ask: Why not and why not now?’ she [Jackson-Lee] said.

I would “simply” answer “Why?”

“Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., who is running for president and has introduced a version of Jackson-Lee’s bill in the Senate, said it is wrong to present the issue as one American writing a check for another, and called on lawmakers to deal with what he said is continued racism in America.”

“Citing racial disparities on issues such as health and education, he said America has a criminal justice system “that is indeed a form of new Jim Crow.”

‘“And so we as a nation have not yet truly acknowledged and grappled with racism and white supremacy that has tainted this country’s founding and continues to persist in those deep racial disparities and inequalities today,’ he said.”

reps 6

“Meanwhile, former NFL player and conservative author Burgess Owens pointed to the Democratic Party as historically responsible for injustices against black Americans, from slavery to the Ku Klux Klan to the literacy rates for black Americans in Democratic states and cities.”

‘“How about the Democratic Party pay for all the misery brought to my race, and those who after they learn our history decide to stay there … and every white American, Republican or Democrat that feels guilty because of their white skin should need to pony up also — that way we can get past this reparation and recognize that this country has given us greatness,’ he said.”

reps 1

Now there’s a proposal I could get behind!

“A Fox News poll in April found that [over] 60 percent of Americans oppose paying cash reparations to descendants of slaves, while just 32 percent support it.”

It seems that we have about 30%-35% of the people in this country who support just about any type of liberal craziness that comes down the road.

reps 3

Let’s take a moment to get real about this whole reparations deal, now.

First…, let’s be clear…, reparations for African Americans regarding slavery is not going to happen.

reps 2

And second…, all of these discussions about it are only disingenuous political theater aimed at some African-American voters who are looking to get something for nothing, disingenuous political theater aimed at creating an additional racial divide in our country, and generally a big waste of time.

reps 10

That being said…, I have a few additional comments regarding the topic of “reparations:”

  1. No one who actually was a slave is still alive.
  2. On one who actually owned a slave is still alive.
  3. Looking at “African-Americans” like Senator Corey Booker or Senator Kamala Harris, who are lighter skinned than some white people with a moderate tan, makes me wonder if they would propose payments based on what percentage any person actually was African? If you were 20% African, would you get a check for 20% of a full reparation check?
  4. If someone, who was a slave, had 100 documented descendants, would that reparations check be divided by 100 first and reduced by the percentage of African descent noted above?
  5. And who would pay for these reparations? It certainly wouldn’t be fair for people who are descendants of people from the northern states, who didn’t have any slaves, would it?
  6. And what about the descendants of people from the northern states, who fought and died in the Civil War in order to free the slaves? Shouldn’t these families get a kick-back from the people receiving reparations as well?  I mean, after all, we wouldn’t even be talking about reparations if the North hadn’t won the Civil War.

reps 8

reps 9

Just a few things to consider when pondering all of this craziness.

And what ever happened to The Congress dealing with our immigration problems, our country’s infrastructure, health care, and the ever increasing national debt, just to name a few important pending issues?

reps 7

I guess we know where the priorities of the democrats lie…, and if you’re not an illegal immigrant or people looking for a hand-out, you’re out of luck.

reps 5

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

UFOs are back in the headlines!

I must admit that I have an interest and a curiosity in the subject of UFOs.

On one hand my interest and curiosity lies with the possibility that we are being visited by extraterrestrials, and on the other hand we have the U.S. government seemingly trying to cover up this possible UFO activity, which peeks my interest as well.

ufos 5

Taking the “laws” of nature and physics into consideration, it is extremely likely that there are other intelligent life forms out there in the universe, but it is also extremely unlikely they’ve been able to visit us.

The closest star system to Earth is Alpha Centauri, which is 4.22 million light years away; meaning if we could travel at the speed of light (which we can’t) it would take us 4.22 million years to get there.

And that’s the closest star!

See what I mean when I say “it is also extremely unlikely they’ve been able to visit us.”

But…, we make those assumptions based only on knowing what we know.  We don’t know what we don’t know yet!  Science learns more every day, and Man’s limitations are changed every day as well.  So who knows?

But that begs the question, if nothing is happening regarding UFOs, why the need to cover anything up?

ufos 4

If nothing is happening regarding UFOs, why the need to draft new guidelines to report these “encounters?”

According to Christopher Carbone for Fox News, this is exactly what the U.S. Nay is currently doing.  “The U.S. Navy is drafting new guidelines for pilots and other employees to report encounters with ‘unidentified aircraft.’”

ufos 1

“The new effort comes in response to more sightings of unknown, advanced aircraft flying into or near Navy strike groups or other sensitive military facilities and formations, according to the Navy.”

‘“There have been a number of reports of unauthorized and/or unidentified aircraft entering various military-controlled ranges and designated air space in recent years,’ the Navy said in a statement to Politico, which first reported the move.”

ufos 3

“For safety and security concerns, the Navy and the [U.S. Air Force] take these reports very seriously and investigates each and every report.”

“The initiative comes amid increasing interest from lawmakers and the public following the release of classified files from the Defense Intelligence Agency which revealed the funding of projects that investigated UFOs, wormholes, alternate dimensions and other obscure topics…”

Hmmm.

“That research, first reported by The New York Times in 2017, was funded by the Department of Defense under its Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) and reportedly spent $25 million conducting studies and trying to evaluate multiple unexplained events.”

“Chris Mellon, a former Pentagon intelligence official and ex-staffer on the Senate Intelligence Committee, told Politico that establishing a more structured, official means of reporting what the military now calls ‘unexplained aerial phenomena’ (UAP), rather than ‘unidentified flying objects,’ would be a ‘sea change’ (a profound or notable transformation).”

“Right now, we have a situation in which UFOs and UAPs are treated as anomalies to be ignored rather than anomalies to be explored,” he added.

Christopher Wilson of Yahoo News adds that, “The Navy has updated its guidelines for pilots to report unidentified flying objects, the New York Times reported, following a series of mysterious sightings off the East Coast.”

“The Navy pilots [involved with these sightings] will be part of a new History Channel series, ‘Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation.’”

“The newspaper says pilots based on the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt saw the objects — some of which they described as spinning like tops and reaching 30,000 feet — during the summer of 2014 through March 2015 in training exercises off the Atlantic coast from Virginia to Florida.  In 2014, an F/A-18 Super Hornet pilot reported nearly colliding with one [a UFO]. Two pilots were quoted by name in the story. They said they began to see the objects after receiving upgraded radar systems.”

‘“People have seen strange stuff in military aircraft for decades,’ Lt. Ryan Graves said. ‘We’re doing this very complex mission, to go from 30,000 feet, diving down.  It would be a pretty big deal to have something up there.’”

Ya…, I’d say so.

A scene from the History Channel’s “Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation.” (Image: History Channel)

ufo 2

There have been other such reports over the years.

The truth is out there my friends.

The truth is out there.

ufos 2

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Democrats are “walking away” (#WALKAWAY) from the lies and the foolishness of the democrat party and choosing to support President Trump!

(Please refer to my previous blog, “Just #walkaway Renee…,” from August 10, 2018, for a more complete background on the “#walkaway” movement.)

President Trump is poised to formally launch his 2020 re-election campaign Tuesday night in Orlando, Fla., and many of his supporters have been camped outside the Amway Center in anticipation.

According to local reports, the first Trump supporters showed up as early as 2:30 a.m. Monday for President Trump’s rally, which is slated to start at 8 p.m. on Tuesday and will be broadcast live on the Fox News Channel!

Fox News correspondent Lauren Blanchard was on the scene Tuesday morning on “Fox & Friends,” meeting some of the people who are looking forward to seeing the president.

Three women, Maria, Nancy and Jenny, arrived Monday afternoon and camped overnight.

‘“We are all former Dems,’ Maria told Blanchard, saying they all support the ‘Walk Away’ [#WALKAWAY] movement for disillusioned Democrats.”

away 16

Yes my democrat friends…, walk away from “the dark side” and set yourself free to acknowledge the truth.

away 6

away 4

Walk away from “the dark side” and set yourself free to see the liberal propaganda for what it is.

away 3

Walk away from “the dark side” and choose life instead of death.

away 8

Walk away from “the dark side,” which puts our country and its people last, instead of putting us first.

away 9

“Nancy said the president ‘unites everybody’ at his rallies and it feels like a ‘rock concert’ for those in attendance.”

“The president tweeted on Monday morning that his campaign has received more than 100,000 ticket requests for the event in an arena that only holds 20,000 people.”

away 1

I can hear it now…

“Four more years!”

“Four more years!”

away 20

away 21

away 19

away 17

away 14

away 12

away 11

away 10

away 5

away 18

Thank you to David Montanaro of Fox News for contributing to this article.

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Apparently, L.A. isn’t on-board with California’s “sanctuary” and “open border” policies.

A recent headline by Andrew O’Reilly of Fox News read, “Border War: Los Angeles officials clash with burbs over homeless ‘dumping’”

“Border war?”

How can you be embroiled in a “border war” if you don’t believe in the concept of borders?

LA 12

LA 1

At least that’s what I’ve been hearing from all of your liberal representatives back in Washington.

They’re calling the situation there a “crisis.”

I’ll tell you what L.A., when you decide to recognize we have a crisis on the southern border, we’ll consider recognizing your “crisis.”

Until then, I’d have to say that your “crisis” is manufactured.

LA 11

I’d have to say the only “crisis” you have there is a crisis in leadership.

Does any of this sound familiar?

It should.

Because we hear these kind of comments regarding illegal immigration on our southern border, on a daily basis, from democrats and the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media.”

LA 10

You’re also claiming the suburbs there are “dumping” homeless people in your city.

Based on your welcoming nature of illegal immigrants into our country, you should be welcoming these people into your community with open arms as well.

You are a “sanctuary” city after all, aren’t you?

LA 8

If your type of immigration policies are good for our country, why wouldn’t they be good for your city?

Just sayin”.

O’Reilly continues by saying, “The debate over shelters and affordable housing is a much larger issue in California, but L.A. city officials say they just want their neighbors to follow the law and do their part.”

So the people in L.A. “just want their neighbors to follow the law and do their part.”

LA 9

Ohhh…, now they want people to follow the law!

Never mind their sanctuary policies that look the other way of the law when they release illegal immigrants out onto the streets as opposed to letting The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) know they have these people in custody.

Never mind their stances on illegal immigration that have no problem ignoring proper, and legal processes for people coming to our country.

Never mind their willingness to spend the money of U.S. citizens, intended to be spent on other U.S. citizens, on illegal immigrants instead.

You’ve got a lot of nerve L.A.

And your level of hypocrisy has reached new heights.

Please don’t expect any sympathy from the rest of us unwashed “deplorables!”

LA 7

LA 2

LA 11

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

The New York Times cries, “Democracy is not going to save itself!”

Ahhh, the noble and misguided New York Times.

What are we referring to here?

David Montanaro of Fox News reported, “In a new op-ed Friday, author and columnist Michelle Goldberg warned that President Trump is “unbound,” arguing that his remark this week on potentially accepting dirt from foreign countries on his political rivals shows he has “no loyalty” to the United States.”

“In the New York Times piece, titled ‘Trump to America: Who’s Going to Stop Me?’ Goldberg questions whether the ‘alarming’ moment will galvanize the opposition.”

‘“Maybe the insult of it can jolt the country out of its current stasis,’ she wrote.”

OK…, time out Michelle.

President Trump was only talking…, responding to a hypothetical question posed to him.

fake 4

While your friend, Hillary Clinton, not only accepted “dirt” from a foreign country, during the 2016 election…, she actually paid to get that “dirt.”

Where was your outrage at her actual actions as opposed to the President’s hypothetical words?

fake 5

I just can’t believe you are that ignorant Michelle, so I just have to assume you are simply a manipulative, liberal propagandist.

“Trump said in an interview with ABC News that he would listen to information from foreign governments, saying that ‘there isn’t anything wrong with listening.’ He also gave conflicting answers on whether he’d contact the FBI, saying at one point that he would not.”

Who could blame the President if he had second thoughts on sharing anything with the FBI, since they were illegally spying on him and basically planning a coup against him over there.

Just some minor considerations that Michelle Goldberg would never dignify with a mention (propaganda by omission).

“Goldberg said the so-called Trump ‘Resistance is exhausted by last year’s push to retake the House and deflated by the anti-climactic aftermath of the Mueller report.’”

Awww…, do all of the hardworking, anti-American, liberal babies need a nappy wappy?

Good!

‘“For two and a half years, as Trump has treated his oath of office the way he’s rumored to have treated a Moscow hotel bed, it’s felt as if something has to give. But day by day, what’s giving is the will to stop him,’ she wrote.”

I’m not really sure what Michelle is talking about here, but I hope she’s not referring to allegations in the discredited Steele dossier!

In either case, her message here is confused one and an illegitimate one, as well as being disingenuous.  All qualities of a good little liberal “journalist!”

fake 3

‘“Two years ago the president basically admitted to obstruction of justice on television when he told an interviewer, Lester Holt of NBC, that he’d fired James Comey as F.B.I. director because of the Russia investigation. Now he’s telling us, again on TV, that having gotten away with accepting foreign help in an election once, he’s planning to do it again. I know everyone’s tired. But democracy is not going to save itself,’ she concluded.”

Geez Michelle…, you are just full of disinformation, and full of sh%t!

I’ll tell you what…, you go ahead and worry about saving whatever you think “democracy” is, and President Trump and the rest of us will continue to worry about saving America!

MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

fake 1

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

The Office of Special Counsel recommends firing the President’s counselor, Kellyanne Conway, over alleged Hatch Act violations!?

First of all…, what the heck is “The Office of Special Counsel?!”

And second of all, what the heck is the Hatch Act?!

According to online-sources, “The United States Office of Special Counsel (OSC) is a permanent independent federal investigative and prosecutorial agency.”

Please note that “independent” is usually a code word that actually means “liberal.”

“The OSC’s primary mission is the safeguarding of the merit system in federal employment by protecting employees and applicants from ‘prohibited personnel practices,’ especially reprisal for ‘whistleblowing.’”

Ahhh yes…, “safeguarding” and “whistleblowing.”  Let’s be clear…, the only “safeguarding” that takes place is reserved for members of “the swamp.”  Regarding “whistleblowing,” the OSC protects federal employees who are whistleblowers UNLESS that whistleblowing has to do with liberal activity or liberal individuals…, in which case the whistleblowers are either ignored or vilified.

“The agency also operates a secure channel for federal whistleblower disclosures of violations of law, rule, or regulation; gross mismanagement; gross waste of funds; abuse of authority; and substantial and specific danger to public health and safety.”

For example…, how many charges of “gross mismanagement” or “gross waste of funds” have you ever heard come out of this office before?

None, right?

I sure don’t remember any.

So, I guess there has never been any “gross mismanagement” or “gross waste of funds” in the federal government!

That’s really good to know!

I’m sooo relieved!

Again…, this “secure channel” is really a “secure filter” that determines whether the allegation ever sees the light of day.

“In addition, OSC issues advice on the Hatch Act and enforces its restrictions on partisan political activity by government employees.”

This is the area we are dealing with in this case.

“OSC has a staff of around 120 and is currently run by Henry Kerner.”

According to Brooke Singman of Fox News, “The Office of Special Counsel recommended Thursday that Kellyanne Conway be fired from the federal government for violating the Hatch Act on ‘numerous occasions.’”

“The OSC said, in a report released Thursday, that White House Counselor Conway violated the Hatch Act by ‘disparaging Democratic presidential candidates’ while speaking in her official capacity during television interviews and on social media.”

kelly 5

‘“Ms. Conway’s violations, if left unpunished, would send a message to all federal employees that they need not abide by the Hatch Act’s restrictions. Her actions thus erode the principal foundation of our democratic system—the rule of law,’ the OSC said in a statement Thursday, noting that Conway has been a ‘repeat offender.’”

In review…, the Hatch Act deals with enforcing restrictions on partisan political activity by government employees.

Please enlighten me as to which spokesperson, for any president, has dealt in a non-partisan manner?

If I were to list all of the government employees here that were ever “guilty” of partisan political statements and activities here, the list would virtually be endless.

kelly 8

What we have here is another case of “swamp fever” and/or “Trump derangement syndrome” rearing its ugly head.

kelly 7

kelly 6

These people have to be kidding, right?

Meanwhile, “The White House on Thursday blasted the OSC ruling as ‘unprecedented.’”

Yes…, and that’s EXACTLY what it was…, “UNPRECEDENTED.”

‘“The Office of Special Counsel’s (OSC) unprecedented actions against Kellyanne Conway are deeply flawed and violate her constitutional rights to free speech and due process.  Others, of all political views, have objected to the OSC’s unclear and unevenly applied rules which have a chilling effect on free speech for all federal employees,’ deputy press secretary Steven Groves said in a statement Thursday. ‘Its decisions seem to be influenced by media pressure and liberal organizations – and perhaps OSC should be mindful of its own mandate to act in a fair, impartial, non-political manner, and not misinterpret or weaponize the Hatch Act.’”

kelly 3

Well, that’s really putting it nicely.

What happens when The Office of Special Counsel is the one displaying “partisan political activity by government employees?”

Just sayin’.

kelly 1

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Senator Bernie Sanders and “the big lie(s).”

Watching some news clips recently from a couple of Bernie Sanders’ campaign speeches, Bernie impressed upon me the level of disdain he and many of his friends actually have for President Trump.

It is so apparent that they are all deathly afraid of President Trump and how he is able to drag them and their motives out into the sunlight.

They will literally say and/or do ANYTHING to delegitimize and obstruct him.

He began by stating that President Trump, “is the worst president in the history of the country.”

bernie 10

He then said that President Trump’s administration is, “the most corrupt administration in history.”

He then added that President Trump “is a pathological liar.”

Not just a liar, mind you, but a “pathological liar.”

We’ll get back to this pathological liar thing later.

anti bernie sanders memes Pretty Anti Government Jokes

The democrats and the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” certainly have pushed these three false narratives, but they are all undeniably unfounded by any measure. But this is the way of the socialist and fascist political establishment.

bernie 4

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” – Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister

I believe Joseph Goebbels would be proud of Bernie Sanders’ efforts in the regard!

bernie 1

Bernie then proceeded to accuse President Trump of being:

A racist.

A sexist.

A bigot.

A religious bigot.

A homophobe.

A xenophobe.

A transphobe.

And last but not least…, an Islamophobe.

Then, of course, we have a whole list of things President Trump is “anti.”

He’s anti-this, anti-that, anti-this and anti-that.

Is there ANY negative type of connotation that hasn’t been attached to President Trump?

And they complain about President Trump’s name calling!

The only name he ever called Bernie was “crazy!”

Now there’s a name I think you could make a case for!

bernie 9

bernie 7

bernie 6

bernie 11

WINNING!

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑