Tulsi Gabbard’s a democrat?

She sure doesn’t sound like any of the democrats I know!

That’s probably why she didn’t get too much support in the democrat presidential primaries.

According to Ronn Blitzer of Fox News, “Former Representative Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, asserted that tech industry leaders and Democrats such as Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and former CIA director John Brennan are ‘domestic enemies’ of the U.S. who are more dangerous than the rioters who stormed the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6.”

“In a video and thread posted to Twitter Tuesday morning, the former Democratic presidential candidate denounced the violent protesters, but warned that efforts to combat insurgency through surveillance and other monitoring activities posed a greater threat to the country.”

Amen, sister…, but you better watch it…, you’re on the fast track here to getting banned by Twitter, Facebook, and maybe even Bed, Bath and Beyond!   

But who is Tulsi Gabbard?

According to Ballotpedia.org, “Gabbard was born in 1981 and grew up in Hawaii. In 2002, when she won election to the state House of Representatives at the age of 21, she was the youngest person elected to public office in the state’s history. She served in the House until 2004. 

Since 2003, Gabbard has been a member of the Hawaii Army National Guard. She has been deployed on two tours of duty in the Middle East.

Starting in 2005, she served as a field medical unit specialist in Iraq. During her second tour, she led security missions and helped train the Kuwait National Guard. Between the two tours, Gabbard graduated from the Accelerated Officer Candidate School at the Alabama Military Academy and received a B.S. in business administration from Hawaii Pacific University.  

Gabbard was elected to the Honolulu City Council in 2010. She served on the council until 2012, when she ran for and won a seat in the U.S. House.  Gabbard (Democratic Party) ran for election for President of the United States. She withdrew before the Democratic convention on August 18, 2020.  In 2012, she became the first Hindu elected to Congress.”

She definitely has an interesting and colorful background.

Blitzer continues by reporting, ‘“The mob who stormed the Capitol on January 6 to try to stop Congress from carrying out its constitutional responsibilities were behaving like domestic enemies of our country,’ Gabbard said. ‘But let’s be clear, the John Brennans, Adam Schiffs and the oligarchs in Big Tech who are trying to undermine our constitutionally protected rights and turn our country into a police state with KGB-style surveillance are also domestic enemies — and much more powerful, and therefore [more] dangerous, than the mob that stormed the Capitol.’”

“KGB style surveillance?”

Well, Schiff has had Russia on his mind for the last four years.

Russia, Russia, Russia!

 “Gabbard then showed a clip of Brennan telling MSNBC that Biden’s nominees and appointees ‘are now moving in laser-like fashion to try to uncover as much as they can’ regarding activities that he said were reminiscent of ‘insurgency movements’ that have risen up in other countries.” 

What about the “insurgency movements” perpetrated by our own government and government agencies against President Trump, Brennan? 

“[Adam] Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee [a true oxymoron if there ever was one], introduced a bill in 2019 that would create a new statute for a federal offense of domestic terrorism.”

“The bill did recognize the potential for abuse [Kind of like the FISA warrants abuse used against President Trump, huh, comrade Schiff?], calling for a report on civil liberty issues that arise from the new statute to be made public within four years of the bill’s passage and enactment.”

Oh, yes…, let’s not forget to act like you care about any civil liberty issues!

“Another 2019 bill, sponsored by Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., calls for establishing offices in the Justice Department, FBI and Department of Homeland Security that would ‘analyze and monitor domestic terrorist activity.’”

Aren’t they already suppose to be doing this?

Or, would this be the democrats’ own personal version of the KGB?

And aren’t they already performing this function?

This would just make it official and “legal,” I guess.

Leave it to old dirt bag Dickie Durbin!

“Since the Jan. 6 riot, lawmakers in Washington have once again been considering a domestic terrorism bill, leading civil rights groups to push back, claiming that federal authorities already have the tools they need to stop criminals without giving them additional powers.”

That’s funny.

We had months and months and months of “domestic terrorism” going on in almost all of our major cities, and democrats didn’t say a word.

Now, we have one incident in their backyard and something has to be done immediately.

What a bunch of hypocritical, anti-American, pieces of garbage.  

“At the same time, social media companies like Twitter and Facebook have been blocking accounts that they say have posted inflammatory comments, including those of former President Donald Trump.”

Only “inflammatory comments” against the approved democrat-Nazi propaganda and regime, of course.

“Gabbard called upon Biden and lawmakers from both parties not to allow measures that would infringe upon Americans’ rights in the name of law enforcement.”

Uh, yeah…, it’s called following The Constitution, which all of these pukes swore to defend by the way. 

‘“President Biden, I call upon you and all of Congress from both parties to denounce efforts by Brennan and others to take away our civil liberties endowed to us by our Creator and guaranteed in our Constitution. If you don’t stand up to them now, then our country will be in great peril,’ she said.”

You are absolutely right, Tulsi…, and I’m so encouraged to hear someone from the democrat party stand up for those civil liberties.

Thank you.

You now have another fan!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Democrat Nazism.

“Democrat Nazism” is a term I coined to describe the type of Nazis these current democrats are.

They aren’t an example of the original, or traditional, Nazis.

They aren’t an example of neo-Nazis, like skinheads.

They represent their own version of Nazism…, Democrat Nazism.

The scary thing about Democrat Nazism is that the top people behind it are not out in front of it, but lurking in the shadows.

These are people with A LOT of money who fund any anti-American and anti-decency group they can.   

The people we see in our government, the people running “big tech,” the mainstream media, any many other people running many other companies, are just puppets and useful idiots in the grand scheme of things.

These knowingly, or unknowingly, Democrat Nazis are most assuredly a formidable group, however.

They operate under the same American freedoms that they hope to destroy, while they deflect from their own actions, and accuse those trying to defend our freedoms as the fascists.

It’s a brilliant strategy.

Evil, but brilliant.

These people are not stupid and they cannot, and should not, be underestimated.

They are constantly working to redirect our attention away from themselves and onto other fake news like Russian collusion, impeachment hoaxes, and any other crap they can manage to stick to the wall.   

The bottom line is, a world without the United States, as we know it, will become a world none of us will want to live in.

Do any of these quotes sound familiar today?

They should.

It’s been around 80 years since most of them were said, but most of them apply to the democrats of today.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

The CENSORING of America!

In recent days, we have seen Facebook and Twitter censoring articles critical of presidential candidate, Joe Biden, and his son, Hunter.

They claim these articles are “unverified,” and therefore should not be spread on social media.

Oh…, do you mean like the unverified Russian collusion reports which were shoved down our throats for over two years?!

For over two years…, night and day!!!

Seriously?!

And the people attempting to spread these reports are having their accounts censored, locked, blocked, or shutdown altogether!

Is this really happening in America?!

I feel like we are experiencing censorship you could expect to experience in Communist Russia or Communist China…, not in The United States of America. 

 I don’t recall Facebook and Twitter censoring ANY anti-Trump, Russian hoax, anonymous source, reports.

Facebook, Twitter, and the mainstream media have shown their hands here.

They are all undeniably co-conspirators and propaganda allies of the democrat party.

Undeniably and unabashedly.

Without question.

In a related article, according to Brian Flood of Fox News, “Ex-Facebook honcho Tim Kendall says Big Tech is a ‘threat to democracy,’ and calls for social media reform.”

‘“Media Angle’ is a column [for Fox News] offering perspectives on the media landscape from the newsmakers themselves.

‘“Moment’ CEO Tim Kendall is among the stars of the wildly popular Netflix documentary ‘The Social Dilemma,’ which tackles the negative impact social media and Big Tech can have on people — and the former Facebook executive feels Big Tech is a threat to democracy that could eventually lead to a civil war in America.” 

‘“Extreme outcomes are the logical end conclusion if there is no action on social media reform during the increasing destabilization of civil society,’ Kendall told Fox News.”

“The Social Dilemma” features several Silicon Valley insiders explaining the dark side of social media, with everyone from the co-inventor of Facebook’s ‘like’ button to high-powered executives weighing in.” 

“Kendall, who is a central figure in the film, was once the director of monetization at Facebook but now runs ‘Moment,’ a company dedicated to ‘fighting to reimagine the tech industry as one built for its users.’”

“MA: Big tech is called a ‘global assault on democracy’ in the film, and you say you’re concerned it could lead to a civil war. Why are these horrifying claims realistic?”  

“Kendall: The attention-based business model of social media companies is a threat to democracy. We as users are attracted to content that entertains us and reinforces our views. ‘Big Social,’ as I call it, knows this and presents information that will keep us coming back to their platforms. These corporate practices encourage online tribalism that exacerbates the societal division we see today amid unprecedented economic, climate, and public health turmoil.”

“I truly believe things will not get better until tech companies move away from creating exploitative products that drive conflict over conversation, division over unity, and misinformation over truth. Extreme outcomes are the logical end conclusion if there is no action on social media reform during the increasing destabilization of civil society.”  

“MA: A recent report showed the overwhelming majority of campaign contributions from employees at big tech firms went to Democratic candidates. Do conservatives have even more to fear than liberals and progressives?” 

I can answer that one! 

The real answer is a resounding “YES!”

“Kendall: We cannot allow the conversation around misinformation and social media addiction to become a partisan issue. Big Social does not care what content you are consuming, where you live, or what you believe so long as you are giving away your time to their platforms and helping drive up their advertising revenues.”

What do you mean, “We cannot allow the conversation around misinformation and social media addiction to become a partisan issue?”

It IS most definitely a “partisan issue.”

It IS an attack on conservatives by the liberals who control and run these social media companies. 

And “Big Social” absolutely does care about what “content you are consuming,” and they are intent on making sure they steer you on the “enlightened” and the “approved” liberal path.

“MA: What needs to happen to alleviate your concerns about social media’s impact on modern society?”   

“Kendall: I think there are three things that need to change. First, until the financial incentives are removed these companies will continue to operate by creating social media addicts of its users. Second, we need better regulation—no industry, including tech, should be in the position to regulate themselves. Third, we need innovation to help people take back their lives from their devices. This is in part why I started my company, ‘Moment,’ to develop tools that give control back to individuals.”

Okay…, so one and three won’t be happening anytime soon.

I’m not normally a big fan of government regulations, but in this case, we really have no other options. 

Discrimination calls for regulation!!!

‘“The Social Dilemma’ is now streaming on Netflix.”

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please let me know by “clicking” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts. 

We’re all entitled to our opinions.  I value yours and your feedback as well.

I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑