Tulsi Gabbard’s a democrat?

She sure doesn’t sound like any of the democrats I know!

That’s probably why she didn’t get too much support in the democrat presidential primaries.

According to Ronn Blitzer of Fox News, “Former Representative Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, asserted that tech industry leaders and Democrats such as Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and former CIA director John Brennan are ‘domestic enemies’ of the U.S. who are more dangerous than the rioters who stormed the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6.”

“In a video and thread posted to Twitter Tuesday morning, the former Democratic presidential candidate denounced the violent protesters, but warned that efforts to combat insurgency through surveillance and other monitoring activities posed a greater threat to the country.”

Amen, sister…, but you better watch it…, you’re on the fast track here to getting banned by Twitter, Facebook, and maybe even Bed, Bath and Beyond!   

But who is Tulsi Gabbard?

According to Ballotpedia.org, “Gabbard was born in 1981 and grew up in Hawaii. In 2002, when she won election to the state House of Representatives at the age of 21, she was the youngest person elected to public office in the state’s history. She served in the House until 2004. 

Since 2003, Gabbard has been a member of the Hawaii Army National Guard. She has been deployed on two tours of duty in the Middle East.

Starting in 2005, she served as a field medical unit specialist in Iraq. During her second tour, she led security missions and helped train the Kuwait National Guard. Between the two tours, Gabbard graduated from the Accelerated Officer Candidate School at the Alabama Military Academy and received a B.S. in business administration from Hawaii Pacific University.  

Gabbard was elected to the Honolulu City Council in 2010. She served on the council until 2012, when she ran for and won a seat in the U.S. House.  Gabbard (Democratic Party) ran for election for President of the United States. She withdrew before the Democratic convention on August 18, 2020.  In 2012, she became the first Hindu elected to Congress.”

She definitely has an interesting and colorful background.

Blitzer continues by reporting, ‘“The mob who stormed the Capitol on January 6 to try to stop Congress from carrying out its constitutional responsibilities were behaving like domestic enemies of our country,’ Gabbard said. ‘But let’s be clear, the John Brennans, Adam Schiffs and the oligarchs in Big Tech who are trying to undermine our constitutionally protected rights and turn our country into a police state with KGB-style surveillance are also domestic enemies — and much more powerful, and therefore [more] dangerous, than the mob that stormed the Capitol.’”

“KGB style surveillance?”

Well, Schiff has had Russia on his mind for the last four years.

Russia, Russia, Russia!

 “Gabbard then showed a clip of Brennan telling MSNBC that Biden’s nominees and appointees ‘are now moving in laser-like fashion to try to uncover as much as they can’ regarding activities that he said were reminiscent of ‘insurgency movements’ that have risen up in other countries.” 

What about the “insurgency movements” perpetrated by our own government and government agencies against President Trump, Brennan? 

“[Adam] Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee [a true oxymoron if there ever was one], introduced a bill in 2019 that would create a new statute for a federal offense of domestic terrorism.”

“The bill did recognize the potential for abuse [Kind of like the FISA warrants abuse used against President Trump, huh, comrade Schiff?], calling for a report on civil liberty issues that arise from the new statute to be made public within four years of the bill’s passage and enactment.”

Oh, yes…, let’s not forget to act like you care about any civil liberty issues!

“Another 2019 bill, sponsored by Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., calls for establishing offices in the Justice Department, FBI and Department of Homeland Security that would ‘analyze and monitor domestic terrorist activity.’”

Aren’t they already suppose to be doing this?

Or, would this be the democrats’ own personal version of the KGB?

And aren’t they already performing this function?

This would just make it official and “legal,” I guess.

Leave it to old dirt bag Dickie Durbin!

“Since the Jan. 6 riot, lawmakers in Washington have once again been considering a domestic terrorism bill, leading civil rights groups to push back, claiming that federal authorities already have the tools they need to stop criminals without giving them additional powers.”

That’s funny.

We had months and months and months of “domestic terrorism” going on in almost all of our major cities, and democrats didn’t say a word.

Now, we have one incident in their backyard and something has to be done immediately.

What a bunch of hypocritical, anti-American, pieces of garbage.  

“At the same time, social media companies like Twitter and Facebook have been blocking accounts that they say have posted inflammatory comments, including those of former President Donald Trump.”

Only “inflammatory comments” against the approved democrat-Nazi propaganda and regime, of course.

“Gabbard called upon Biden and lawmakers from both parties not to allow measures that would infringe upon Americans’ rights in the name of law enforcement.”

Uh, yeah…, it’s called following The Constitution, which all of these pukes swore to defend by the way. 

‘“President Biden, I call upon you and all of Congress from both parties to denounce efforts by Brennan and others to take away our civil liberties endowed to us by our Creator and guaranteed in our Constitution. If you don’t stand up to them now, then our country will be in great peril,’ she said.”

You are absolutely right, Tulsi…, and I’m so encouraged to hear someone from the democrat party stand up for those civil liberties.

Thank you.

You now have another fan!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

It’s Trump’s fault!

Yes, my friends…, if anything, and I mean if ANYTHING happens that isn’t good, it’s President Trump’s fault…, and NOTHING he does is allowed to even be considered good.

ablame 8

I’m really getting bored with this liberal blame game that seems to be on a never-ending loop.

Can we just assume that President Trump is to blame for everything from now on so you liberals can just shut up?

I mean, your litany of lame excuses and shifting of all of the blame from yourselves onto President Trump is so disingenuous, very tiresome, and quite sickening as well.

ablame 1

ablame 2

ablame 7

 

We see a seemingly never-ending parade of liberal mayors…,

ablame 9

blue state governors…,

ablame 12

democrat congresspeople, and, of course, the liberal propaganda media, blaming President Trump for all of their, and all of the world’s problems.

ablame 11

ablame 14

But remember, President Trump has only been in politics the last 3½ years.

So, racism wasn’t an issue prior to 2017?

Social justice wasn’t an issue prior to 2017?

Police brutality wasn’t an issue prior to 2017?

Crime rates, shootings and murders weren’t an issue in any of our big cities prior to 2017?

Criminal justice reforms weren’t an issue prior to 2017?

Economic opportunity in depressed areas of our country and our cities wasn’t an issue prior to 2017?

In fact, these were all existing issues prior to 2017.

These have all been existing issues prior to 2017…, AND FOR THE LAST 50 YEARS!

The fact is, President Trump has done more to address these issues in the last 3½ years than had been done in the prior 50 years!

And I’m talking about actual positive actions…, not just lip service or promises.

You don’t believe me?

Let’s take a look at just a few of President Trump’s accomplishments.

 

Our economy, under President Trump’s direction, saw historic lows for African American unemployment and African American youth unemployment, as well as historic low unemployment rates for Latinos, Asians, and Women.

 

Nearly 8 million Americans have been lifted off of food stamps.  Indeed, the latest data from the Department of Agriculture shows that 7.7 million fewer Americans receive food stamps now than did when Trump entered the White House.

 

The poverty rate has fallen to its lowest level in nearly two decades, according to new data released by the U.S. Census Bureau.

 

The First Step Act was promoted and signed into law by President Trump. This law shortens mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug offenses. It also eases a federal “three strikes” rule, which currently imposes a life sentence for three or more convictions, and issues a 25-year sentence instead. Most consequentially, it expands the “drug safety-valve,” which would give judges more discretion to deviate from mandatory minimums when sentencing for nonviolent drug offenses.

Beyond sentencing reform, the First Step Act includes provisions that will improve conditions for current prisoners and address several laws that increased racial disparities in the federal prison system.

“We’re all better off when former inmates can receive and re-enter society as law-abiding, productive citizens,” Trump said in remarks endorsing the bill. “And, thanks to our booming economy, they now have a chance at more opportunities than they’ve ever had before.”

 

Opportunity Zones were created under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and signed into law by President Trump.  The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA,) known for creating Opportunity Zones, is often celebrated for its potential to move billions of dollars into low-income communities. However, there remains an open question as to whether this program will ultimately serve to add value, or extract values, from these communities.  Opportunity Zones (OZs) are defined as “economically-distressed communities where new investments, under certain conditions, may be eligible for preferential tax treatment.” First conceived in April of 2018, OZ plans are now in place for communities in all 50 states this year.

 

President Trump signed a bill that will permanently provide more than $250 million a year to the nation’s historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs), along with dozens of other institutions that serve large shares of minority students.  “When I took office, I promised to fight for HBCUs, and my administration continues to deliver,” Trump said. “A few months ago, funding for HBCUs was in jeopardy. But the White House and Congress came together and reached a historic agreement.”

 

H.R.1927: African American Civil Rights Network Act of 2017.  This act recognizes the importance of the African American civil rights movement and those who made sacrifices for it. It authorizes the National Park Service to create a US Civil Rights Network, tying together relevant operations within the Service, that will be tasked with coordinating and facilitating projects to commemorate the history of that movement. The Network will operate for seven years, tending to relevant events and historical sites and developing and disseminating new educational materials on the issue.

 

H.R.1242: 400 Years of African-American History Commission Act.  This bill commemorates the 400th anniversary of the arrival of the first Africans in the English colonies in Virginia in 1619. It creates a 15-member commission, composed of government officials, members of civic societies, and historians, to be appointed within 120 days. The commission will plan, develop, and carry out activities recognizing and highlighting African-American history since that point in time, and it will be authorized to provide grants of up to $20,000 to support related activities at all levels.

 

H.R.267: Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historical Park Act of 2017.  In 1992, the federal government recognized several sites associated with the life of Martin Luther King, Jr., as a collective national historic site. This bill adds one building, the former headquarters of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference that King co-founded, and upgrades the collective site to national park status—the first such entity in Georgia.

 

Presidential Proclamation 115: To Take Certain Actions under the African Growth and Opportunity Act and for Other Purposes.  This proclamation most significantly reverses Obama-era decisions to deny the African nations of Gambia and Swaziland duty-free trade access to American markets under the act named in the proclamation’s title. That access is contingent on maintaining or improving political freedoms and human rights standards.

 

H.R.2989: Frederick Douglass Bicentennial Commission Act.  This bill recognizes Douglass’s exceptional rise from slavery to the forefront of the American civil rights movement, as well as his vital role in abolitionism, contributions to the Union in the Civil War, and service in national government. It affirms that all Americans would benefit from learning more about and following the examples laid out by Douglass. The act creates a commission to plan and carry out federal activities to commemorate the 200th anniversary of his 1818 birth.

 

And there has never been a bigger supporter of the safety of American citizens, law enforcement, and our first responders, in The White House, than President Trump.  The lawlessness we see in our large, liberal, cities is a result of opposition to President Trump’s policies, not because of them.

Regarding New York City, specifically, Julia Musto of Fox News reports that, “Dan Bongino blasts liberal mayors blaming COVID-19 and Trump for violence: ‘This is pathetic.’”

“Liberal mayors’ attempts to blame violence over the Fourth of July weekend on the coronavirus and the Trump administration is ‘grotesque and pathetic,’ former NYPD officer and Secret Service agent Dan Bongino said Tuesday.”

“In an interview on ‘Fox & Friends,’ Bongino specifically called out Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio.”

“The Democrat-run cities both saw spikes in violent crime over the holiday weekend. According to the Chicago Police Department, there were 87 people shot and 17 killed from July 2 to July 5. There were at least 44 shooting incidents and 10 dead in New York City as the Big Apple saw its surge in violence continue.”

‘“I heard Mayor Lightfoot in Chicago also trying to pin this on [President] Donald Trump somehow. How was this Donald Trump? And again, it was racist, of course. Everything is racist. God forbid you call out the fact that young Black children are being shot in the head,’ he remarked.”

‘“It’s not President Trump that did this. It’s that guy in City Hall, Bill de Blasio — your Communist mayor who has failed you and — as I said on this program and others, repeatedly for years now — people will die because of the arguments going on over public safety,’ Bongino concluded. ‘And, tragically, I was correct.’”

ablame 13

 

So, after decades upon decades of inaction and ineffectiveness by the “do nothing” political establishment, democrats and republicans, we are now told that all of these problems are President Trump’s fault, and that all of these politicians who have overseen these problems for decades and decades now suddenly have all the answers.

ablame 10

Fool us once, shame on you…, fool us twice (or a hundred times), shame on us.

ablame 16

ablame 15

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

We’re all entitled to our opinions.  I value yours and your feedback as well.

I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Hee Haw! Hee Haw!  Are these people and their “service” animals making jackasses out of the rest of us?

“Ooh, ooh, ooh, ah, ah, ah, ah!

That’s a big “YES” in Capuchin Monkey language…, another popular “service” animal.

I’ve heard multiple stories now about questionable “service” animals and questionable use of these animals.

I believe it’s time for MrEricksonRules to rule on the correct way of looking at this whole “service” animal situation.

aanimals 7

The latest story regarding “service” animals revolves around a horse!

Yes…, a horse.

According to Lee Brown of The New York Post, “A Michigan woman startled other passengers on a recent series of flights when she brought aboard a mini-service horse and traveled with him in first class to California.”

aanimals 1

“Ronica Froese made the journey starting on Feb. 7 with her equine companion Fred, who was specially trained to make the high-altitude trip, according to WXMI.”

If you say so, Ronica.

‘“I paid an arm and a leg for tickets, but I did so because it was Fred’s first time and I wanted him to be comfortable,’ Froese told the station.”

aanimals 2

‘“I wanted him to have the most room.’”

Oh by all means!

Let’s make sure the horse is comfortable!

I haven’t been comfortable on a flight since 1977!!!

“Froese, who has trained Fred — who dressed in a sleek suit that made him look like a Lucha Libre wrestler — to be a therapy and a service horse, said everyone was ‘sweet as pie.’”

And “There ain’t no education in the second kick of a mule” either.  Right Ronica?

“She said that the ‘experience was way better than I actually anticipated.’”

That’s because I wasn’t sitting anywhere near you, Ronica!

Believe that!

“Fred’s flying days may soon be a thing of the past, however, with the US Transportation Department recently announcing plans to tighten the laws so that only dogs actually trained to help the disabled qualify for flights.”

“Surprisingly, Froese seems to agree in part — telling WXMI that the system is ‘out of control.’”

What?

Please tell me more.

‘“It’s a very abused process — there are a lot of untrained service animals on the plane that are not trained,’ Froese told the station.”

Oh…, and Ms. Froese knows this because, how?

‘“It’s definitely an abused system, but the sad part is what the DOT is looking at doing, they are looking at excluding me as a handler from taking my horse on the plane,’ she said.”

I agree it’s definitely an “abused system” as well, Ronica…, but you, of course, are not doing any of the abusing.

You and your horse, I mean.

You and your horse sitting in first class on an airplane, I mean.

I really don’t think I’m that far out of touch with our society today, am I?

Maybe I am.

aanimals 6

If flying on a passenger jet next to horses, cows, pigs, snakes, etc. is now okay these days, then I guess “I” am the jackass!

But I really don’t think so.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section, “The Department of Justice published revised final regulations implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for title II (State and local government services) and title III (public accommodations and commercial facilities) on September 15, 2010, in the Federal Register. These requirements, or rules, clarify and refine issues that have arisen over the past 20 years and contain new, and updated, requirements, including the 2010 Standards for Accessible Design (2010 Standards).”

So they’re adding to and modifying the law without worrying about going through that old bothersome Congress, whose job it is to make the laws.

Having unaccountable, unelected, Washington bureaucrats creating their own legislation is a troubling habit that Obama era “regulators” grew accustomed to.

The Americans with Disabilities Act [Law] was enacted in 1990 under George H. W. Bush.

“Beginning on March 15, 2011, only dogs are recognized as service animals under titles II and III of the ADA.”

“A service animal is a dog that is individually trained to do work or perform tasks for a person with a disability.”

“Generally, title II and title III entities must permit service animals to accompany people with disabilities in all areas where members of the public are allowed to go.”

“Service animals are defined as dogs that are individually trained to do work or perform tasks for people with disabilities. Examples of such work or tasks include guiding people who are blind, alerting people who are deaf, pulling a wheelchair, alerting and protecting a person who is having a seizure, reminding a person with mental illness to take prescribed medications, calming a person with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) during an anxiety attack, or performing other duties. Service animals are working animals, not pets. The work or task a dog has been trained to provide must be directly related to the person’s disability. Dogs whose sole function is to provide comfort or emotional support do not qualify as service animals under the ADA.”

What was that again?

“Dogs whose sole function is to provide comfort or emotional support do not qualify as service animals under the ADA.”

So “providing comfort or emotional support does not qualify” when determining the need of a “service” animal.

Okay.

I just wanted to make sure we were clear about that.

“Under the ADA, State and local governments, businesses, and nonprofit organizations that serve the public generally must allow service animals to accompany people with disabilities in all areas of the facility where the public is normally allowed to go. For example, in a hospital it would be inappropriate to exclude a service animal from areas such as patient rooms, clinics, cafeterias, or examination rooms. However, it may be appropriate to exclude a service animal from operating rooms or burn units where the animal’s presence may compromise a sterile environment.”

“When it is not obvious what service an animal provides, only limited inquiries are allowed. Staff may ask two questions: (1) is the dog a service animal required because of a disability, and (2) what work or task has the dog been trained to perform. Staff cannot ask about the person’s disability, require medical documentation, require a special identification card or training documentation for the dog, or ask that the dog demonstrate its ability to perform the work or task.”

Hmm, that’s interesting.

Soooo, someone parking in a “disabled only” parking spot has to display a “disabled” parking tag, but these people cannot be questioned in the least bit?

That doesn’t seem appropriate to me…, but let’s proceed.

“Allergies and fear of dogs are not valid reasons for denying access or refusing service to people using service animals. When a person who is allergic to dog dander and a person who uses a service animal must spend time in the same room or facility, for example, in a school classroom or at a homeless shelter, they both should be accommodated by assigning them, if possible, to different locations within the room or different rooms in the facility.”

I’m kind of not getting how “they both should be accommodated.” In a situation regarding allergies, both parties would not be able to be in the same space.  One of the parties would, by definition, have to be denied access.

It happens, people.

The world cannot be completely fair, or even fair at all in some cases.

Adults understand this.

And what was all that talk earlier about, “It may be appropriate to exclude a service animal from operating rooms or burn units where the animal’s presence may compromise a sterile environment?”

I guess there’s compromising an environment and there’s compromising an environment.

“Establishments that sell or prepare food must allow service animals in public areas even if state or local health codes prohibit animals on the premises.”

That makes perfect sense, doesn’t it?

“In addition to the provisions about service dogs, the Department’s revised ADA regulations have a new, separate provision about miniature horses that have been individually trained to do work or perform tasks for people with disabilities.”

Remember what I said before about these unaccountable bureaucrats adding to and modifying the law without worrying about having to go through Congress…, whose job it is to make the laws?

Well, here you go.

When the law was originally passed, it was limited to service dogs only.  The law was never intended to allow horses or any other animal the designation of a “service animal.”

Yet, here we are.

In many cases, people intentionally confuse “service animals” with “comfort animals,” “emotional support animals,” or “therapy animals,” in order to get additional allowances or considerations that they are not necessarily entitled to.

In fact…, the Americans with Disabilities Act itself does not actually define or address service animals at all!  Animals are not even mentioned in the statute, but concepts like “reasonable accommodations” and “reasonable policy modifications” are established there, which opens the doors to a world of interpretations.

“Until 2010 the DOJ and DOT regulations defined service animals the same way (“any guide dog, signal dog, or other animal individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of an individual with a disability …”). In 2010 DOJ revised their regulations and eliminated the “other animal” part of the definition; now only dogs can be considered service animals under DOJ’s rules. A service animal can be any type, size, or breed of dog, but cannot be any other type of animal.”

“Cats, monkeys, goats, rats, snakes, rabbits, pigs, or other types of animals, regardless of whether they have been trained to perform tasks for people with disabilities or how well-behaved they might be, are not considered service animals under DOJ’s rules.”

In addition those animals listed above, we have seen iguanas, ferrets, parrots, squirrels and ducks claimed to be “service animals” as well.

aanimals 3

aanimals 4

aanimals 5

Please don’t get me wrong.

I love dogs, and I don’t have a problem with most animals.

I just don’t think animals belong in the cabin on a passenger jet, for any reason, period.

Not when the airlines are already treating us like a bunch of sardines when they pack us in there!

 

NOT WINNING in the service animal, support animal, and therapy animal arena at this time.

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

Stand back while California’s socialist storm troopers trample all over The Constitution, state and federal laws!

According to Judith Miller, a contributor for Fox News and formerly a  Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative reporter for The New York Times, “Police officers and FBI agents who visited freelance journalist Bryan Carmody’s San Francisco home in April couldn’t have been more polite. Would he mind telling them who leaked him a copy of the police report about the mysterious death of Jeff Adachi, the city’s public defender?”

San Francisco is easily considered one of the most “liberal” cities in America, and California easily one of the most “liberal” states.

The term “liberal” seems to be evolving, however.

The term “liberal” represents the limiting of free speech now.

The term “liberal” represents intolerance now.

The term “liberal” represents government control now.

The term “liberal” represents fascism now.

ca 2

“Liberals” appear to be clinging to, and talking about, the traditional “liberal” ideals…, but their actions don’t match their rhetoric anymore.

Their words say “liberal,” but their actions cry out “fascist.”

The term “liberal” is now a “code word” for “fascist.”

Spread the word.

ca 7

“Carmody was equally polite, he told me. But firm. No, he would not betray the source who gave him a copy of the controversial report,” Miller added.

“The next visit by law enforcement officers was not as ‘polite.’”

“Carmody told me that shortly after 8 a.m. Friday nearly a dozen cops and FBI agents showed up at his home with a sledgehammer and weapons. They broke through his front gate and would have broken down his front door had he not rushed to let them in.”

CA 1

“The law enforcement officers seized Carmody’s phones, computers, tablets, notebooks, and the expensive video equipment he uses to report on breaking news, which he sells to local TV stations. And they repeatedly asked him the same question they had asked in April about who had leaked him the document. Only this time he was in handcuffs – for nearly seven hours.”

This sounds like something you could envision Nazi storm troopers doing, or Russian KGB agents doing…, not the police or the FBI in San Francisco, California, USA.

ca 4

“Journalists have been outraged by the apparent blatant violation of state and federal law by the San Francisco Police Department and the FBI. But as the Los Angeles Times said in an editorial Tuesday, it isn’t only journalists who should be outraged.”

“All Americans who care about privacy and a free press should be alarmed by what happened to Carmody. And the FBI and San Francisco Police Department should be deeply embarrassed.”

I’m afraid to say those days seem to be gone, Ms. Miller.  “Liberals” just don’t get embarrassed anymore.  That’s because they aren’t embarrassed.  They feel completely justified with any action that supports “the cause,” or “the swamp…,” and if you have a problem with that you’re next.

Oh, and hey…, why don’t we EVER see a “liberal” journalist, reporter, lawyer, politician, whatever, being “raided” by the police or the FBI?

Just sayin’.

“Instead, law enforcement agencies are circling the proverbial wagons, dredging up pathetic excuses for what on its face appears to be a gross violation of Carmody’s privacy and civil rights.”

This doesn’t just “appear to be a gross violation of Carmody’s privacy and civil rights…,” IT WAS a gross violation of Carmody’s privacy and civil rights.”

“The San Francisco Police Department has refused to answer specific questions about its scandalous conduct. Officials have hidden behind a statement that does little to explain why they apparently ignored federal law… to get what they wanted.”

ca 3

“Yes, local officials were deeply embarrassed by the leak of a police report showing that Adachi, who had often pursued allegations of abusive police tactics, had died in an apartment with a woman who was not his wife after what appeared to be an accidental overdose of cocaine and alcohol. And yes, the police were under pressure to explain how their report had leaked.”

Again…, “embarrassed” is not the right word here, Ms. Miller.  Officials were not “embarrassed…,” officials wanted to keep this information under wraps for political reasons and to cover their own backsides.

“As for the FBI, a spokesman for the San Francisco office told me that its agents did not participate in the raid on Carmody’s house. They simply ‘went along to question him,’ the spokesman said. When Carmody declined to answer questions and requested a lawyer – repeatedly, Carmody confirmed – the FBI agents left.”

Ha!  What a maroon!

The FBI says “they went along” but they didn’t “participate in the raid?”  How exactly does that work?

No…, you definitely “participated.”

If you were there, you participated.

ca 6

“David Stevenson, the police spokesman, has refused to answer specific questions about the department’s conduct and has not released copies of its search warrant applications. But legal demands for the release of the applications are probably imminent.”

Huh…, that’s odd.

Unaccountability…, unaccountability everywhere!

Stay tuned for the future antics of The Peoples Socialist Republic of California!

ca 5

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑