Who’s guilty of inciting who?

The democrats and the establishment RINOs (Republicans In Name Only) are attempting to impeach President Trump…, again…, this time for “inciting violence,” which The President did not do. 

The President encouraged the protesters there, last Wednesday, to go to the capitol and let their voices be heard, but there was no call for violence.  

In fact, have you ever heard President Trump, or any republican for that matter, call for any kind of violence or personal attacks?

Ya…, me neither.

On the other hand, we have a documented history of many democrats doing exactly what they are accusing President Trump of doing.

Isn’t this becoming a pattern of behavior for the democrats?  

Here are some (not all of the) examples of democrats calling for violence or physical confrontations against President Trump, people in his administration, and republican members of Congress. 

Emma Colton, Social Media Manager for The Washington Examiner, reports, “Rep. Maxine Waters…, Sen. Cory Booker…, and Sen. Jon Tester, have all made comments suggesting violence or confrontations against Republicans. All of their Twitter accounts remain active, while the videos themselves are also circulating on the massive social media site.”

“Rep. Maxine Waters, for example, notably called for her supporters to harass Trump administration officials in public during a rally in 2018.’

“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out, and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,’ Waters said.”

“Waters is far from alone.”

“New Jersey’s Booker [Senator Cory Booker] was also recorded in 2018 urging activists at the National Conference on Ending Homelessness to ‘get up in the face of some congresspeople.’”

‘“… that’s my call to action here. Please don’t just come here today and then go home,’ he said. ‘Go to the Hill today. Get up, and please get up in the face of some congresspeople.’”

Then in 2019…, Senator Jon Tester of Montana said on MSNBC, “I don’t think, even in states where Donald Trump won big, that it does you any good running away from Donald Trump.  I think you need to go back and punch him in the face.”

“Then in 2020, House Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi said during a National Governors Association meeting that when a person is involved with politics, ‘you have to be ready to take a punch, and you have to be ready to throw a punch.’”

What is it with these democrats always wanting to punch somebody?

I mean, seriously?

“’Grabien’ [a multimedia marketplace company] founder Tom Elliott recently shared videos of Democrats making such comments on his Twitter account, and said that the violence seen at the Capitol last Wednesday would have occurred even if Trump had won in November, ‘Because Democrats have been endorsing violence as a political tactic throughout the entire Trump Administration.’”

We have also seen Senator Chuck Schumer get in on this action.

According to The Editorial Board of The Wall Street Journal, “Democrats like to accuse President Trump of violating institutional democratic norms, and often he does with his rhetorical broadsides. But at least he’s never directly threatened the U.S. Supreme Court the way Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer did.”

“Speaking to a crowd on the Supreme Court steps, the leading Senate Democrat declared: ‘I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price.’ He meant Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, the newest Justices who were appointed by President Trump.”

“Mr. Schumer was speaking before abortion-rights activists as the Supreme Court considers whether to curtail the ability of abortion providers to sue on behalf of women seeking abortions—a doctrine known as third-party standing. Mr. Schumer, still addressing Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, added: ‘You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.’”

“The ‘whirlwind?’ ‘What hit you?’ We won’t go so far as to call that an incitement to violence, but it surely was a threat of political reprisal against the Justices if they don’t vote the way Mr. Schumer wants.”

The Wall Street Journal may not want to go that far, but I’ll call that an incitement of violence. 

“The remarks [Schumer’s remarks] drew a rare and pointed public rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts, who said: ‘Justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. All Members of the Court will continue to do their job, without fear or favor, from whatever quarter.’”

It sure seems like Chief Justice Roberts agrees with me!

Then we have our wonderful Vice-president elect, Kamala Harris.

Camille Caldera of USA TODAY reports, “Though largely peaceful, some of this summer’s protests have at times turned violent.”

Uh, I think you have backwards Ms. Caldera.  You should have said, “Though largely violent, some of this summer’s protests have at times been peaceful.”

Regardless…, “A clip of Democratic vice presidential nominee Sen. Kamala Harris on an episode of ‘The Late Show with Stephen Colbert’ in June has resurfaced online.”

“Its title on YouTube claims: ‘Kamala Harris wants the riots to continue and not let up, not now not even after the election.’”

“The exchange between Harris and Colbert — which took place on June 17, a few weeks after George Floyd was killed by police in Minneapolis — referred to protests, not riots. The word ‘riot’ is not even mentioned in the 30-second exchange.”

That would be consistent with the democrats’ denial, at the time, that any riots were even occurring.   

‘“I know there are protests still happening in major cities across the United States. I’m just not seeing the reporting on it that I had for the first few weeks,’ Colbert said.”

‘“That’s right,’ Harris replied. ‘But they’re not gonna stop. They’re not gonna stop, and this is a movement, I’m telling you.’”

‘“They’re not gonna stop, and everyone beware, because they’re not gonna stop,’ she added. ‘They’re not gonna stop before Election Day in November, and they’re not gonna stop after Election Day.’”

‘“Everyone should take note of that, on both levels, that they’re not going to let up — and they should not. And we should not,’ she concluded.”

So, I get the impression you feel “they’re not gonna stop,” Kamala.

Saying they (the rioters, looters, arsonists, vandals, and those committing assaults and murder) “should not stop” is encouraging and inciting continued violence, is it not?

Again…, it sure sounds like it to me.

Now last, but certainly not least, we have the illegitimate President-elect himself, Joe Biden.

According to Veronica Stracqualursi, for CNN, ‘“They asked me would I like to debate this gentleman, and I said no. I said, if we were in high school, I’d take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him,’ said Biden, getting laughter and applause from the crowd at the University of Miami.”

“Biden said Tuesday, ‘I’ve been in a lot of locker rooms my whole life. I’m a pretty damn good athlete.’”

Thanks for that inciteful assessment of yourself, Joe!

You just might be a better “athlete” that you are a politician!

In fact, I’m sure you are!

Anyway…

So, as we watch the democrats proceed with their hypocritical impeachment party, today, just remember who’s guilty of inciting who.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

They still don’t get it!

And, again, by “they” I mean our wonderful politicians, our ever-diligent news media, and “the swamp” in general, regarding the protesters coming to Washington.

Let me begin by giving Vice President Mike Pence a shout-out for his contribution at the Senate’s electoral vote session!   

Hey…, I know!

Maybe, if the DOJ and FBI had done their jobs investigating election fraud, there would have been no need for the protesters to come to Washington.

How about that?

And former Attorney General Bill Barr has the nerve to say, “President Donald Trump’s conduct…, was a betrayal of his office and supporters.”

If anyone betrayed his office, it was you, Barr.   

In a statement to The Associated Press (AP), Barr said Thursday that, “orchestrating a mob to pressure Congress is inexcusable.”

What’s wrong with “pressuring Congress” to uphold The Constitution?

You should have tried it yourself more often.

The AP continued by saying, “Barr was one of Trump’s most loyal and ardent defenders in the Cabinet.”

Wait for it…, wait for it…

Excuse me, but I had to stop laughing before I could continue!

With friends like that, who needs enemies?!

Can we get any “fact checkers” to validate that statement?

Oops…, I forgot that “fact checkers” only “fact check” statements made by conservatives.

Fact checking the “fake news” is not allowed.

The Ap continues by saying, “Barr resigned last month amid lingering tension over the president’s baseless claims of election fraud and the investigation into Biden’s son.”

“Baseless claims,” huh?

I think you would have to actually do some investigating before you could determine the claims were “baseless.”

All you would’ve had to do was pretend you were checking into election fraud, and that may have been enough.

But you couldn’t even be bothered to do that.  

Maybe, if The Supreme Court had even bothered to hear Texas’ lawsuit, which was backed by 17 other states by the way, there would have been no need for the protesters to come to Washington.

But no one even wanted to hear about election fraud, and all of our concerns were dismissed out of hand.

Texas and the other 17 states’ concerns were just completely unfounded and unworthy of even listening to their concerns.

Again, all The Supreme Court would’ve had to do was consider the states’ concerns of election fraud, and that may have been enough.

But they couldn’t even be bothered to do that. 

Were they afraid of having to consider the truth?

It sure seems that way.

This is why the protesters showed up in Washington.

THEY WERE ALL TIRED OF HAVING TO PUT UP WITH ALL OF THE LIBERAL AND ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICAN BS, WHILE HAVING NO RECOURSE NOW, SINCE THE ELECTION PROCESS HAS APPARENTLY BEEN COMPROMISED, AND NOBODY SEEMS TO CARE!   

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Brad “Benedict Arnold” Raffensperger.

In case you don’t know, I’m talking about Brad Raffensperger, the supposed republican, and the Georgia Secretary of State.

The same secretary of state who denies any irregularities occurred during the Georgia presidential election.

The same secretary of state who cut a backroom deal with Stacey Abrams (Georgia politician, lawyer, and voting rights [really election fraud] activist, who served in the Georgia House of Representatives from 2007 to 2017, serving as minority leader from 2011 to 2017.) which basically removed any accountability requirements for mail-in ballots, without the approval from the state legislature, which would be unconstitutional, if anyone would care to notice.  

The same secretary of state who refuses to release any of their data from the election, and the same secretary of state who, along with their RINO (Republican in Name Only) governor, Brian kemp, has not allowed a special session of their own legislature to investigate the allegations of election fraud.

Allegations supported by security camera video and dozens of signed affidavits.

According to CBS 46 News in Atlanta, “The video tape evidence alleges proof of ballots being counted without oversight. A subcommittee comprised of both Republicans and Democrats held a hearing at the State Capitol for perhaps the biggest bombshell presented to lawmakers from inside State Farm Arena.”

“For the first time, the president’s legal team, led by [Rudy] Giuliani, presented surveillance video from the state’s largest voting center. The video allegedly shows people taking out at least four boxes of ballots from underneath a table, and then counting them after hours with no election supervisors present.”

‘“The same person that stayed behind, the person that cleared the place out under the pretense that we are going to stop counting is the person who put the table there at 8:22 in the morning. I saw four suitcases come out from underneath the table,’ Attorney Jacki Pick said.”

“It is believed that each box consisted of about 6,000 ballots. If accurate, that would amount to about 24,000 potential votes.”

And yet, these documented election violations are dismissed with a wave of a hand.

Now why would that be?

Because Brad and his scurvy friends have since investigated themselves and found they didn’t do anything wrong.

Well, alrighty then!

Are we talking about Georgia, one of the United States, or about Georgia, the country, located between Russia and Turkey, that seceded from the Soviet Union in 1991?

Now I come across an article from “fake news” CNN, by one of Hillary’s and Obama’s BFFs, David Axelrod, who praises “The courage of Brad Raffensperger!”

Oh, yes…, Brad is sooo courageous.  

This ought to be good.

David Axelrod, a senior CNN political commentator, was senior adviser to President Barack Obama and chief strategist for the 2008 and 2012 Obama presidential campaigns.

According to Axelrod, “The hour-long recording of the President of the United States, defeated and desperate, begging Georgia’s secretary of state over the phone to ‘find’ him enough votes to overturn the election results there was appalling.”

As appalling as secretly recording The President’s phone conversation, without his knowledge, and then releasing it to the “liberal propaganda” media?

“After four years of Donald Trump’s blatant assault on democratic institutions rules, norms and laws, anyone who is shocked by this latest outrage simply hasn’t been paying attention. It was only a year ago that Trump was impeached for a similar attempt to strong-arm the president of Ukraine.”

“DONALD TRUMP’S BLATANT ASSAULT ON DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You say that, “…anyone who is shocked by this latest outrage simply hasn’t been paying attention.”

On the contrary…, the democrats are counting on people not paying attention, and helping them to not pay attention!

Otherwise more people would be aware of the “blatant assault” on President Trump by first the Obama administration, then the DOJ and the FBI, and then the corrupt and anti-American democrat leadership, along with most of the media in this country!

Just sayin’.

Axelrod continues, “No, what was remarkable about the whole, surreal and sordid conversation was not Trump’s recycling of debunked [No, just denied, out of hand, actually.] conspiracy theories nor his insistent claim, against all evidence [Evidence that we aren’t allowed to actually see, of course], that he had won the state by ‘hundreds of thousands of votes.’”

“It wasn’t hearing the President sounding like a mafia don.”

And Axelrod would know what a mafia don sounds like because…?

“It was the calm and steadfast way Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and his attorney, Ryan Germany, firmly rebuffed him.”

Well, they did have the advantage of knowing the call was being recorded, after all.

“After patiently listening to and rebutting each of Trump’s bizarre diatribes [All of which are well documented and supported by witnesses, by the way.] about supposedly rigged machines, dead voters, shredded ballots and other social media-driven drivel, Raffensperger cut to the chase:”

‘“Well, Mr. President,’ he said, in even tones, ‘the challenge that you have is, the data you have is wrong.’”

“It’s a safe bet that Raffensperger, a Republican [A RINO, actually] who supported Trump [just so he could get elected], would have much preferred that Joe Biden had lost Georgia [Well, obviously not.]. Raffensperger might then have avoided Trump’s wrath and the political and personal threats he has endured.”

What threats exactly did The President make?  I only heard him make requests.

Requests from The President that Raffensperger treat him fairly and insure that election laws were being followed?   

‘“They don’t want to vote [referring to Georgian Trump supporters],’ Trump told Raffensperger, who will be up for reelection in 2022. ‘They hate the state, they hate the governor, and they hate the secretary of state. I will tell you that right now. The only people that like you are people that will never vote for you [Georgia democrats]. You know that, Brad, right?’”

‘“It is more illegal for you than it is for them [the cheating democrats] because, you know, what they did and you’re not reporting it,’ the President said. ‘That’s criminal, that’s a criminal offense. And you can’t let that happen. That’s a big risk to you and to Ryan, your lawyer…that’s a big risk.’”

That’s a threat?

That sounds more like The President offering sound and truthful advice more than anything.

“In his book ‘Profiles in Courage,’ former President John F. Kennedy described rare acts of political courage, in which politicians placed duty and conscience ahead of public opinion or their own political well-being.”

This is the definition of President Trump, actually, Axelrod, but you predictably choose to shine you light on Raffensperger instead.  

“By standing up for the integrity of the election despite Trump’s shameless pressure, Raffensperger has proven himself, in America’s moment of trial, to be an admirable exception. He has shown courage.”

“By standing up for the integrity of the election,” of course you mean “standing up for the MANIPULATION of the election.”

“Voters may not reward him for it, but history will.”

Only the twisted, liberal propaganda, version of history will remember Brad “Benedict Arnold” Reffensperger in any kind of a positive light.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Joe Biden’s election miracle.

Even Smokey Robinson never saw a miracle like this one!

My apologies to all of the millennials out there for that reference.

According to Benny Johnson on “The Benny Report,” “It’s a magical time of year.  It’s a season of wonder and amazement!  When millions of American go to bed, and while we are all sleeping, something magical happens, and we wake up to a miracle! Obviously, we’re not talking about Christmas here, we’re talking about Joe Biden’s 2020 election night.”

Yes, that was an amazing night!

I remember going to sleep with President Trump ahead by tens of thousands of votes, and even hundreds of thousands of votes in some cases, then waking to find Joe Biden had somehow, in the early hours of  Wednesday, November 4th, closed the gap or taken the lead in a number of these swing states.

But before we can truly appreciate Joe Biden’s “election miracle,” we need to point out a few 2020 election facts and some historical presidential election facts.

In 2020, President Trump expanded his voter base by 11 million votes.

The votes President Trump received from African-Americans rose by 50%!

And the votes President Trump received from Hispanic Americans rose by 35%!

And yet, he supposedly lost.

Joe Biden supposedly received 80 million votes.  The most, by far, of any presidential candidate in history.

In fact, that’s 11 million more votes than Barack Obama received at the height of his popularity.

Hmmm.  

Despite beating Obama’s turnout in 2008, Biden won a record low number of counties.

Hmmm, again.

Only 17% of American counties, a record low of 527 counties (out of 3,143), were won by Joe Biden.

Former President Obama won 873 counties in 2008.

Yet, Joe Biden supposedly won.

President Trump won 18 of the 19 “bellwether” counties that have historically predicted the presidential election winner.   

Yet, Joe Biden supposedly won.

Joe Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton virtually everywhere, except in a few key swing state counties…, those counties encompassing the metro areas of Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta, and Philadelphia.

Hmmm, again, again.

Additionally, Joe Biden somehow managed to win despite democrat losses nationwide.

Twenty-seven seats in Congress were regarded as toss-ups.

Republicans have not lost a single one of those “toss-up” elections.

That means that voters went out and voted for their local republican candidates, but voted against the most popular republican president in history?

That’s odd.

But wait, there’s more.

President Trump received over 90% of the republican primary vote. Historically, no incumbent who has received over 75% of their party’s total primary vote has ever lost re-election.

A record 18 million voters came out for President Trump in the 2020 primaries.  That’s more than any incumbent in history.

The previous record was held by Bill Clinton who only had 9 million.

That’s impressive.

And Joe Biden didn’t even bother to campaign against President Trump.

Benny Johnson adds that, “Trump had an army [of supporters], and Joe Biden had kindergarten circles!”

Now, all of this would have to be classified as circumstantial evidence, but taken as a whole, it is quite substantial.

At the very least, all of this circumstantial evidence has to make you wonder, if not seriously question the 2020 presidential election “results.”

According to the “Britannica” website, “The notion that one cannot be convicted on circumstantial evidence is, of course, false. Most criminal convictions are based on circumstantial evidence, although it must be adequate to meet established standards of proof.”

And, well, there you have it.

It is my opinion that the 2020 presidential election should definitely be put into question, and at least be investigate thoroughly, so as to establish the integrity of the election.

I do believe in miracles…, just not this one.   

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Does the FBI and the DOJ pursue anything anymore if it isn’t related to President Trump?

We had the whole “Spygate” operation of the Obama administration illegally spying on the Trump campaign and then the Trump presidency.

Then we had the whole Russian collusion hoax, which was launched by the DOJ and the FBI, and then perpetuated by the democrats and the fake news mainstream media for over two years!  

Then we had Jeffrey Epstein, who was either silenced or allowed to commit suicide, in order to protect his influential fellow pedophiles.  

Then we had the impeachment hoax of President Trump, who was accused of doing exactly what former vice president Joe Biden actually did (a quid pro quo arrangement with The Ukraine).

Then we had the Hunter Biden “funny money” cases with The Ukraine, China, and Russia, which were smothered by the DOJ, the FBI, and the media, including social media.      

And now we have election “irregularities” and questionable voting machine software manipulation, in which the usual partners in crime ar all choosing to look the other way.   

It is sooo painfully obvious now that the DOJ and the FBI are in the back pockets of the democrats.

It is sooo obvious that you can expect that no one will go to jail over any of this, and no one will even be charged with anything over any of this.

The fix is in, my friends.   

The foxes, or better said the rats, are in charge of the hen house.

In the case of the Epstein investigation, those in danger of being implicated as pedophiles, or somehow assisting in the allowance of this behavior, are all liberals, democrats, establishment RINOs, politicians, or royals, I might add, which include well-known heads of state and successful businessmen, as well as at least one high-powered lawyer, and science luminaries.  Some of them have already been accused of participation in Epstein’s alleged sex trafficking ring.

Les Wexner, the billionaire behind U.S. fashion retailer L Brands, which owns Victoria’s Secret.

French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel became a member of Epstein’s inner circle in the early 2000s. Brunel “fed” Epstein young girls from “poor backgrounds,” and “lured” them in with “a promise of making good money.” Instead, Brunel would “farm them out to his friends,” including Epstein, “for sexual purposes.”

Prince Andrew, the Duke of York.

Alan Dershowitz, a high-powered lawyer and Harvard Law professor who helped broker a deal with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Alexander Acosta. Before the FBI’s proposed indictment could be presented to a grand jury, Epstein signed a seriously lenient non-prosecution agreement, pleading guilty to a single count of solicitation of a minor in exchange for a cushy 13-month sentence.

Billionaire power couple Glenn Dubin and Eva Andersson-Dubin.

Former President Bill Clinton and Epstein did quite a bit of jet setting on the “Lolita Express,” the press nickname for Epstein’s private Boeing 727 jet.

Former democratic Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell.

Former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson.

Media mogul, billionaire, and former owner of the New York Daily News and the Atlantic, Mort Zuckerman.

Woody Allen.

Attorney General William Barr once also served as counsel at Kirkland and Ellis, the law firm that represented Epstein for his obscenely lenient 2008 plea deal.  This explains a lot.

Ken Starr.  The former independent counsel who investigated President Clinton, Starr served on Epstein’s all-star legal team in 2008, helping to strike a deal that landed Epstein in jail for only 13 months, with work release six days a week. In 2015, Starr dryly defended his work for Epstein: “I was happy to respond to the needs of a client of the firm.”

Stephen Hawking. In addition to his time on “pedophile island,” Hawking took a boat cruise and submarine tour funded by Epstein. According to the Telegraph, Epstein “paid for the submarine to be modified for Professor Hawking, who had never been underwater before.”

According to flight logs of Epstein’s plane, Harvard psychology professor Steven Pinker hitched a ride on the “Lolita Express” in 2002.

Other notable people with ties to Epstein are Harvey Weinstein, Alec Baldwin, and Ted Kennedy.

Guest lists for dinners at his Manhattan townhouse also give a picture of his influence: In 2010, a dinner for Prince Andrew included Katie Couric, George Stephanopoulos, Chelsea Handler, and Woody Allen.

Vicky Ward, the journalist who wrote the 2003 Vanity Fair profile of Epstein, told Slate that “You got the feeling that his friends weren’t real friends — he owned them — that he was the kind of man who collected information about people and then used it over them.” Ward has also offered a more scathing assessment, saying, “What is so amazing to me is how his entire social circle knew about this and just blithely overlooked it … all mentioned the girls, as an aside.”

Thanks to Adam K. Raymond and Matt Stieb from New York Magazine’s Intelligencer and Amelia McDonell-Parry for Rolling Stone Magazine for their reporting on Epstein’s relationships.

According to James Hill of Good Morning America , “Victims’ rights lawyers who have been battling the U.S. Department of Justice for a dozen years over the controversial ‘sweetheart deal’ reached by federal prosecutors in Florida with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein are blasting the department’s long-awaited review of the deal as ‘offensive’ and a ‘whitewash.’”

Like I said, could we reasonably expect anything else from the Department of in-Justice?

‘“I think, frankly, what we got was an effort to paper over what happened,’ said Paul Cassell, a former federal judge who now represents Epstein accusers. ‘I think they’re trying to put the most favorable light on what’s clearly misconduct on the part of their attorneys.’”

“A 350-page report from the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), which was made public Thursday, determined none of the five federal prosecutors who were deeply involved in the Epstein investigation committed professional misconduct or violated any clear and unambiguous rules when they reached the deal without informing or consulting with victims.”

Of course not.

“Instead, the OPR report faulted former Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta, then the U.S. Attorney in Miami, for exhibiting ‘poor judgment’ in deciding to resolve the Epstein case through a non-prosecution agreement and in failing to make certain the alleged victims were notified in advance of Epstein’s guilty plea in state court that ended the federal investigation.”

‘“They just say he used poor judgment, and that’s their way of basically letting everyone off the hook while offering some sort of an olive branch to the victims that we acknowledge weren’t treated perfectly,’ said Brad Edwards, who sued the DOJ in 2008 on behalf of Epstein accusers, seeking to invalidate the once-secret deal. ‘But nobody really did anything wrong. It’s really offensive. It’s hurtful.’”

“Jena-Lisa Jones, who has alleged Epstein sexually abused her when she was just 14, called the Justice Department’s conclusions ‘like another slap in the face’ to victims.”

Better a “slap in the face” to you, Ms. Jones, than any harm come to any of their rich and powerful pedophile friends.

‘“Poor judgment is cheating on a spelling test or speeding five miles over the speed limit. That would be poor judgment to me,’ Jones said after attending a four-hour government briefing on the report’s findings at the FBI office in Miami. ‘I honestly don’t think that anybody will take responsibility in any sense, in any shape or form in the way that they actually should as adults.’”

The funny thing is that she thought anyone would!

“The OPR report, which took 22 months to complete, is not likely to be the last word on the Florida prosecutors’ treatment of Epstein, who was arrested last year by federal authorities in New York and then died while in custody in a Manhattan detention center.”

22 months to complete the report!

This is so typical of their modus operandi (MO), regarding the DOJ and the FBI.  Delay, delay, delay.  Excuse, excuse, excuse.  Then, Ignore, ignore, ignore.     

“Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., who requested the department review after the Miami Herald’s in-depth reports on the Epstein case were published in late 2018, harshly criticized OPR’s conclusions and vowed to keep investigating what he labeled a ‘disgusting failure.’”

‘“Letting a well-connected billionaire get away with child rape and international sex trafficking isn’t “poor judgment” — it is a disgusting failure. Americans ought to be enraged,’ said the senator, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Oversight Subcommittee. ‘Jeffrey Epstein should be rotting behind bars today, but the Justice Department failed Epstein’s victims at every turn.’”

Not to mention a slew of his well connected cohorts!

‘“OPR might have finished its report, but we have an obligation to make sure this never happens again,’ Sasse said in a statement.”

Whatever you say, Senator Sass.

“Authorities in New York, meanwhile, have vowed to continue investigating anyone who may have conspired with Epstein or assisted him in the commission of his alleged crimes. Earlier this year, Manhattan prosecutors charged Epstein’s former girlfriend and close associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, with helping to facilitate and, in some cases, participating in Epstein’s crimes against three minor girls in the mid-1990s. Maxwell pleaded not guilty and has long denied any knowledge of Epstein’s alleged sex-trafficking. Her trial is scheduled for next summer.”

Oh goody!  More investigations that will end up being big wastes of time. 

“And next month, lawyers Edwards and Cassell will argue before the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta that the Epstein deal, which also conferred federal immunity to any potential co-conspirators, should be rescinded because it was reached in violation of the federal Crime Victims’ Rights Act.”

Ah, yes…, that all important “federal immunity!”

You can ask Hillary’s friends about that as well.

“Villafaña [former federal case prosecutor Marie Villafaña] told OPR that she ‘could not seem to get [her supervisors] to understand the seriousness of Epstein’s behavior and the fact that he was probably continuing to commit the behavior, and that there was a need to move with necessary speed.’”

Oh, they understood alright.

“Much has been made over the years of Epstein employing a ‘dream team’ of highly skilled lawyers to help persuade federal prosecutors to drop their investigation. Epstein’s advocates included the famed Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz and former U.S. Solicitor General Ken Starr, best known for his role as the independent counsel in the Whitewater investigation, which eventually led to the impeachment of former President Bill Clinton.”

“During the negotiations over the deal, Epstein supplemented his team with Starr and Jay Lefkowitz, who had served in the administrations of former Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. Lefkowitz and Starr had each worked previously with Acosta when he was a junior associate at the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis. Acosta met personally with Lefkowitz and Starr after the non-prosecution agreement was signed but while Epstein’s attorneys were pursuing further review of the deal’s terms at higher levels of the Justice Department.”

Justin Vallejo for The Independent writes that, “Swaths of country believe Democratic Party is a front for a pedophile ring.”

You can consider me a part of that “swath,” Mr. Vallejo.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Donald Trump is exactly the kind of person George Washington and the founding fathers envisioned as a President.

Yes…, Donald Trump is exactly the kind of person George Washington and the founding fathers envisioned as a President or as a member of Congress. 

The founding fathers envisioned successful and accomplished people sacrificing their time, and serving a term or two in government for the good of their country, before returning back to private life and letting another citizen step forward for the good of the country.

The founding fathers envisioned people who had gained some sort of expertise, knowledge, and wisdom in their private ventures, and then putting their experience and talent to work for our country. 

The founding fathers did not envision lifelong politicians who would bring nothing to the table other than their ability to get elected somehow.

The founding fathers did not envision individuals staying 20 years, 30 years, 40 years, or even longer in office, and leaving politics significantly richer than when they came.

Like George Washington, Donald Trump was not a politician.  Like George Washington, he was a reluctant servant, who left a comfortable life to do what felt needed to be done for the American people and the country.

Our founding fathers, truly, were wise men.

They established a form of government never before seen in this world.

A government of the people, by the people, for the people.

From the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

Nothing like this had ever been established before.

These founding fathers were undoubtedly great men.

Although I have said that being a great man, sometimes, only requires you to speak the truth and live up to the truth…, like the founding fathers, Abraham Lincoln, and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Here are some quotes from our founding fathers I feel are especially notable”  

“I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth – that god governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid?” – Benjamin Franklin

“To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.” – Thomas Paine

“Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it.” – John Adams

“A fondness for power is implanted, in most men, and it is natural to abuse it, when acquired.” – Thomas Jefferson

“However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion….The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism.” – George Washington

“When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.” – Thomas Jefferson

“Experience hath shown, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.” – Thomas Jefferson

“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” –  George Washington

“Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism.” – George Washington

Thomas R. Pickering and James Stoutenberg of The New York Times notes that, “In September 1796, George Washington, weary of partisan combat just eight years after the ratification of the Constitution and the founding of the nation, wrote a farewell address explaining why he would not seek a third term. His message is worth remembering in our current political moment.”

“In elaborate and thoughtful prose, Washington raised red flags about disunity, false patriotism, special interests, extreme partisanship, fake news, the national debt, foreign alliances and foreign hatreds. With uncanny foresight, he warned that the most serious threat to our democracy might come from disunity within the country rather than interference from outside. And he foresaw the possibility of foreign influence over our political system and the rise of a president whose ego and avarice would transcend the national interest, raising the threat of despotism.”

“Washington certainly had great confidence, but in his address he didn’t brag about his accomplishments. On the contrary, he beseeched the Almighty to soften the impact of his errors and expressed hopes that the country would forgive them.”

“He cautioned against both overly friendly alliances (lest another country’s interests and wars become our own) and excessive hatreds (lest we provoke unnecessary conflict and war with others).”

“Some of Washington’s most prescient warnings were about the dangers of factionalism. He wrote that should one group, ‘sharpened by the spirit of revenge,’ gain domination over another, the result could be ‘a more formal and permanent despotism.’ The despot’s rise would be fueled by ‘disorders and miseries’ that would gradually push citizens ‘to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual.’”

“As if envisioning the political tribalism and 24/7 cable news culture of today, he urged political leaders to restrain ‘the continual mischiefs’ of political parties. The ‘spirit of party,’ he wrote, ‘serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection.’”

“And then he arrived at one of his greatest concerns: The ways in which hyperpartisanship could open the door ‘to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus, the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.’”

“Since 1893, a senator has read the farewell address on the floor of the Senate every year on Washington’s Birthday, alternating annually by political party. Bluntly speaking, it’s become little more than an exercise in bipartisan lip service. The House of Representatives stopped reading it decades ago. This was, at least, a form of honesty. Clearly no one was listening anymore.”

“Washington’s goal was to ensure that the young country became stable enough to withstand the threats to liberty and freedom he saw on the horizon — a horizon that has now stretched 220 years into the future. We can never say he didn’t warn us.”

President Washington was definitely uncanny in his predictions for the future.

The funny thing about this article is that The New York Times tries sell us that the republicans and President Trump are the problems Washington was talking about in his farewell address and not the democrats and themselves!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

A “return to normal?”

Are you kidding me?

Seriously?

For the last couple of days, all I hear from democrats is that they’re “relieved,” and that they are looking forward to a “return to normal,” and that we can now start to “heal” what divides us as a nation under a presumed president elect Biden.

“Normal” for democrats is $4.00 a gallon for gas, letting Iran take advantage of us with their flawed nuclear deal, letting all the countries of the world take advantage of us economically via the Paris Climate Accord, shipping all of our jobs overseas, letting the other countries in NATO go back to not paying their fair share, using the FBI, the DOJ and the CIA as weaponized arms of their party, and giving up our oil independence, just for starters.

As someone who feels they can speak on behalf of Trump supporters everywhere…, IT’S NOT HAPPENING!

The cat is now officially and undeniably out of the bag, regarding the democrats, the liberal propaganda mainstream media, and social media’s fascist, pro-democrat, censorship.

The democrats have resorted to cheating, on a grand scale, in this election, and we are not having it.

THERE WILL BE NO “RETURN TO NORMAL,” AND THERE WILL BE NO HEALING, as far as Trump supporters are concerned.

If Joe Biden’s election somehow holds up, he will get the same treatment from republicans that President Trump got from democrats.

First of all, we would declare that “Joe Biden is not our president.”

We would declare that he is an illegitimate president.

Then we would demand investigations into Biden’s actions with China, Russia, and The Ukraine.

Then we will demand he be impeached for his traitorous actions, first regarding his role in the spying and coup attempt when President Trump was first elected in 2016, and then for his quid pro quo with The Ukraine (Which we already have him admitting to, in his own words, on video), and then for his selling of access and considerations to China and Russia.

There’s your “healing” for you, democrats.

But first, let the lawsuits begin regarding the widespread cheating, fraud, and irregularities surrounding this election.

This election is far from over.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please let me know by “clicking” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts. 

We’re all entitled to our opinions.  I value yours and your feedback as well.

I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Excuse me…, say what?!

What did I just hear you say?

According to Donna Brazile of Fox News, “President Trump’s premature declaration of victory against Joe Biden and false claims of widespread voter fraud by Democrats constitute a dangerous assault on a fundamental principle upon which our nation was founded: the right of the American people to elect our leaders.”

“The truth is that the President’s baseless threats and lawsuits to stop the counting of mail-in votes are desperate attempts to subvert the values shared by Americans throughout our history. His actions are, to put it bluntly, un-American.”

Frankly, I am amazed you have the nerve to lecture anyone about “un-American actions,” and “desperate attempts to subvert the values shared by Americans throughout our history,” Ms. Bazile.

It was only about four years ago that you conspired with the liberal propaganda, fake news media, to get the debate questions to your candidate, Hillary Clinton, prior to the debate.

You, Donna Brazile, are a documented cheater.

You, Donna Brazile, are guilty of everything you’re accusing President Trump of doing.

You, Donna Brazile, are just one more “useful idiot,” intent on doing your part in an effort to destroy our country.      

“Long after our nation’s founding, the right to vote was denied to millions of Americans. Black people had no rights as slaves and were denied voting rights in many parts of the country for another 100 years after Emancipation. Women were denied the vote until 1920. And other groups, including Native Americans, were excluded from voting for many years as well.”

Thank you for the history lesson, of which everyone is already aware, Ms. Brazile.

You forgot to mention, however, that those inequities were cured by our great country for over 100 years now.  

So, what’s your point?

“Unfortunately. and disgracefully, Republicans in many parts of the country want to turn back the clock and are continuing to engage in voter suppression today — with President Trump taking the lead as the suppressor in chief in a frantic effort to stop mail-in votes in several states from being counted. Why? Because many Democrats voted by mail.”

There you go, spreading disinformation again, Donna!

President Trump does not want to suppress votes.

President Trump just wants to make sure only LEGAL votes are counted. 

Is it too much to ask that all of these mail-in votes be verified?

It’s the same old democrat trick of trying to mislead people regarding President Trump’s beliefs and intentions.

Like when the democrats state that President Trump is against immigration.

This is a disingenuous statement, and the democrats know it.  

President Trump is against ILLEGAL immigration. 

He is all for LEGAL immigration.

That is why you won’t hear Lyin’ Joe Biden, “Cackling” Kamala Harris, or any of the other lying liberals, preface their comments about votes needing to be LEGAL votes.  They only say they want all of the votes counted, regardless of whether the vote is a legal vote or not. 

“Right now, a giant question mark hangs over our nation’s future. Will Trump be inaugurated for a second term on Jan. 20 or will former Vice President Biden become president on that day? The only honest answer is that right now we just don’t know.”

This may be the only honest and truthful comment we hear come out of her cheating mouth.  

“But here is a critically important point: There is nothing underhanded, corrupt or fraudulent about the delay in counting votes — no matter how many times Trump falsely says there is.”

This “critically important point” is only you’re cheating attempt at disinformation, Donna.

The truth is, you have no way of knowing, at this point, “There is nothing underhanded, corrupt or fraudulent about the delay in counting votes.”

In fact, you actually do know that the opposite is true.  

“In a year when we’ve seen record mail-in voting by millions of Americans legitimately fearful of gathering in large crowds because of the coronavirus pandemic, the counting of votes is taking longer than usual. That’s no surprise.”

I thought you were crying about voter suppression, Ms. Brazile? 

But now you say there was “record mail-in voting by millions of Americans.

Which is it?

The answer is, of course, whichever serves your desired narrative at any given moment.

“As Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Al Gore’s campaign manager in 2000, I have unique experience with vote counts and recounts. In the presidential election that year George W. Bush was not declared the winner until the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Dec. 12 that a recount of votes in Florida had to stop.”

Again, thank you for the history lesson, of which everyone is already aware, Ms. Brazile.

“Back in 2000 as today, I wanted the Democratic presidential candidate to win. But even more, I have always wanted democracy to win. And I don’t want any American — regardless of political party — to have his or her vote discounted if that vote was cast by the legal deadline and postmarked by Election Day.”

I’m sorry, but that’s a lie Ms. Brazile. 

You do not want “democracy to win.”

If you wanted “democracy to win,” you would not be supporting the subversion of the entire election process.

Once our election process has been compromised, democracy not only doesn’t win, our democracy collapses.

“Heavyweight boxing champion Muhammad Ali famously said: “Don’t count the days; make the days count.”  In the boxing ring, Ali was patient, diligent, and absolutely thorough in getting the job done and winning the fight. In these tumultuous days following Election Day this week, all of us in the political ring would be wise to apply these lessons from the Greatest of All Time.”

I’m not sure how Ali’s quote applies to this election, but, whatever.

“Let’s be patient, diligent, and absolutely thorough in making sure we count every vote, so that every one of our votes counts. The greatest voter turnout in American history demands nothing less.”

LEGAL votes! 

LEGAL votes!

You mean LEGAL votes, right, Donna?!

“Around the country, Democratic, Republican and unaffiliated state election officials and volunteer workers are making sure that mail-in ballots are being counted. This, my fellow Americans, is a win for our democracy. It’s a win for everyone who voted.”

Except all of those people who followed the rules and voted legally.

Many of those people’s votes are being cancelled by an illegal vote.

“To paraphrase the words of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. — who devoted his life to fighting the suppression of voting rights — our votes in this election are, in a sense, cashing a check.”

And this check has insufficient funds!

“Dr. King said: ‘When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir …. And we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. So, we have come to cash this check — a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice.’”

So, you think stealing an election is somehow “justice,” Ms. Brazile?

“You all know who I hope will win this presidential election and you know why. But when the dust settles on the election of 2020, I will be proud that Americans stood up and spoke out.”

You don’t really mean that either, Donna. 

You definitely won’t “be proud that Americans stood up and spoke out,” when it is the Trump supporters who are standing up and speaking out about a stolen election.

And nobody cares if a lying cheater is proud of them or not, Donna.

Just sayin’.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please let me know by “clicking” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts. 

We’re all entitled to our opinions.  I value yours and your feedback as well.

I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

CHEATERS! How the democrats are trying to steal the election.

“Yes, democrats are trying to steal the election in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania,” according to John Daniel Davidson of “The Federalist.”

“In the three Midwest battleground states, vote counting irregularities persist in an election that will be decided on razor-thin margins.”

“As of this writing, it appears that Democratic Party machines in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania are trying to steal the election.”

Oh, there’s no doubt…, they are!

“As reporters and commentators [not to mention millions of voters] went to bed early Tuesday morning, all three states were too close to call, but President Trump led former Vice President Joe Biden by comfortable margins—far beyond what had been predicted in the polls. None of the networks called these states because enough mail-in ballots remained uncounted that it could swing either way, but Trump’s position looked good.”

Yes, it did.

“Then, something strange happened in the dead of the night.”

Haven’t you heard that “nothing good happens after two in the morning?!”

“In both Michigan and Wisconsin, vote dumps early Wednesday morning showed 100 percent of the votes going for Biden and zero percent—that’s zero, so not even one vote—for Trump.”

That, my friends, is what you would call statistically impossible, under “normal” ballot processing.

“In Michigan, Biden somehow got 138,339 votes and Trump got none, zero, in an overnight vote-dump.”

“When my Federalist colleague Sean Davis noted this, Twitter was quick to censor his tweet, even though all he had done was compare two sets of vote totals on the New York Times website. And he wasn’t the only one who noticed—although on Wednesday it appeared that anyone who noted the Biden vote dump in Michigan was getting censored by Twitter.”

Hmmm.  It seems that the twits at Twitter were poised to censor any shenanigans their friends perpetrated on the election.

“Others were quick to note the partisan censorship from Twitter and raise concerns over how 100 percent of a vote dump could possibly go to Biden. But the social media giant has maintained its crackdown on sharing this information. Twitter users could not like or share a tweet from the Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh noting the 138,339-vote dump.”

‘“Buzzfeed’ later reported that according to a spokesperson at ‘Decision Desk HQ,’ the votes for Biden were the result of a ‘data error’ from a ‘file created by the state that we ingested.’ When the state noticed the ‘error’ it updated its count, which somehow gave 138,339 votes to Biden and zero to Trump.”

Sounds legit…, NOT!!!

And “Ingested?”

The words “ingested” and “election” should definitely be mutually exclusive when talking about an election.  

 “There was also something suspicious about the vote reporting in Antrim County, Michigan, where Trump beat Hillary Clinton by 30 points in 2016. Initial vote totals there showed Biden ahead of Trump by 29 points, a result that can’t possibly be accurate, as plenty of journalists noted.”

“After the strange results caught national attention, election officials in Antrim County said they were investigating what they called ‘skewed’ results, working with the company that provides their election software to see what went wrong. The county clerk said they plan to have an answer by Wednesday afternoon.”

So, as usual, when you get caught, you just blame “the computer.”

“Then another mysterious all-Biden vote dump happened in Wisconsin. Biden miraculously overcame a 4.1-point Trump lead in the middle of the night thanks to vote dumps in which he got—you guessed it—100 percent of the votes and Trump got zero.”

It almost hilarious how brazen these democrat cheaters are that they don’t even make any sort of attempt to make their “vote dump” appear somewhat plausible.   

Note the vertical lines in both graphs below:

“On Wednesday, the Trump campaign demanded a full recount in Wisconsin, citing ‘reports of irregularities in several Wisconsin counties which raise serious doubts about the validity of the results.’”

“In Pennsylvania, the Democratic scheme to steal the election is a bit different. Rather than vote dumps that impossibly go 100 percent to Biden, Pennsylvania is relying on the Democratic Secretary of State’s plan to count indisputably late mail-in ballots as though they were received on Election Day—even if they have no postmark.”

“This plan was of course rubber-stamped by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which cited the need for ‘equitable relief’ to address mail delays amid the pandemic.”

And that would be what you would call “illegal.”

State legislatures are the only governmental entities who can legally change a state’s voting procedures.   

“Note that this isn’t just about ballots that come in after Election Day, but about ballots that come in after Election Day that don’t even have a postmark—that is, there is no way to tell when the ballots were mailed, or from where.”

No potential for fraud there!

This is exactly the situation President trump had been saying he was concerned about for months prior to the election.

And as usual, he was right.

“Although it’s true that the long delays we’ve seen for absentee ballot counts are due in part to state laws in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania that prohibit the counting of absentee ballots before Election Day, which is not the case in most other states. But the cumulative circumstances under which these absentee ballots are now being tallied is highly suspicious.”

Highly.

“Unless election officials in Michigan and Wisconsin can explain the overnight vote-dumps and Pennsylvania officials can explain their rationale for counting ballots with no postmark, the only possible conclusion one can come to right now is that Democrats are trying to steal the election in the Midwest.”

But wait…, there’s more.

Miranda Devine for The New York Post says, “Biden may steal an election for the elitists, but Democrats will regret it.”

“Let’s be real. Goliath was never going to let David breeze through the rematch.”

“The provinces, for whom President Trump is an instrument, not an end in himself, were never going to have an easy time winning the 2020 election against the amassed might of the Democratic Party, the ‘Fake News’ media and allied pollsters, Big Tech, woke billionaires and the celebrity class, who united to stamp out the barbarian orange emperor.”

Dang, Miranda, you’re good!

“The ‘chumps’ and ‘ugly folk,’ as Joe Biden calls them, came out in their glorious millions from the American heartland on Election Day and now we will see if people power prevails, if the nationalist populist movement enabled by Donald Trump, but not defined by him, lives to fight another day against the corrupt globalists represented by the sad husk of Biden.”

I like that…, “the sad husk of Biden.”

He is sad.

“It boils down to Trump’s belief that the Democrats perpetrated widespread voter fraud in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and elsewhere to steal the election.”

“While even those in his own party are urging him to lose gracefully [Please note that this is fake news.  No one in the republican party, other than the obvious RINOs, are urging President Trump to “lose gracefully.], the president has every right to ensure electoral laws are enforced to prevent fraud.”

“In fact, he owes it to the 68 million deplorables who voted for him.”

“To that end, Trump has turned to an old ally, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, to lead a heroic legal challenge.”

“In a press conference in Philadelphia Wednesday, Giuliani laid out one clear anomaly in which, contrary to Pennsylvania law, Republican election observers were denied the right to oversee the counting of 120,000 ballots by being forced to stand 20 to 30 feet away from where they were being counted.”

‘“They were never able to see the ballot itself, never able to see if it was properly postmarked, properly addressed, properly signed on the outside…, this went on for 20 hours. While all of you thought there was some kind of legitimate count going on here in Philadelphia, it was totally illegitimate.’”

“Giuliani’s team has also launched a lawsuit in Wisconsin where he says that, after election observers had gone home, ‘at 3 or 4 in the morning about 120,000 ballots appeared…, and they all got counted.’”

“The Trump campaign also filed a lawsuit in Michigan Wednesday, with campaign manager Bill Stepien claiming Republican observers were denied ‘meaningful access to numerous counting locations to observe the opening of ballots and the counting process, as guaranteed by Michigan law.’”

Laws shmaws.

“There are other allegations of fraud or irregularities, late-counted votes and suspected vote harvesting being reported around the country.”

“In one case, a woman claiming to be an election volunteer in Michigan’s Clark County claimed on video she had discovered a box of 500 ballots outside the counting facility from people who were not on the voter rolls.”

“Despite the Democrats pouring millions into flipping Senate seats, their efforts were ultimately feeble as Republican stalwarts like Sen. Lindsey Graham [and Mitch McConnell] easily won reelection.

“In Arizona — which was called early for Biden on election night, but the Trump campaign still says they can win — a ‘data error’ claimed 95 percent of votes had been counted yesterday when only 86 percent had been, and the remainder reportedly were from Trump-heavy counties.”

You don’t say.

“So, you can see that, in such a close election, Trump’s concerns are not frivolous.”

“Despite ‘racist’ charges, Trump did better with minorities than any GOP candidate in 60 years.”

“In any case, Biden as much as declared victory yesterday, saying that by the time the count is finished, ‘I believe I will be the winner…, we are winning in enough states to reach the 270 electoral votes needed to win the presidency.’”

“Trump’s campaign claimed Wednesday he still had a path to victory if he keeps Pennsylvania and somehow Arizona comes back to him.”

“But even if Trump does lose, it may be a blessing in disguise for Republicans.”

I wouldn’t go that far.

“The result has crushed Democratic expectations of a clean sweep. It wasn’t a landslide win against an unpopular president, as we had been told so confidently for months.”

“If Biden wins, it will be by the narrowest margin.”

“And all the hundreds of millions spent on retaking the Senate came to nothing, with the Republicans looking to hold onto their lead. The top targets, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Sen. Lindsey Graham, survived easily.”

“The fatal miscalculations of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in cynically refusing to negotiate on the latest stimulus bill has cost the Democrats dearly in the House, where they have gone backward by at least six seats. They did not manage to get rid of a single Republican. So much for the blue wave.”

“The failure means that in 2022, the House is more likely to revert to Republican control, setting up a lame-duck presidency.”

“The Democrats won’t be able to pack the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College or make DC and Puerto Rico states. They will struggle to impose the Green New Deal.”

“Unfortunately, nothing can be done to stop a President Biden-Harris repeat of the geopolitical errors of the Obama presidency, such as appeasing China and Iran’s mullahs and signing onto the Paris climate accord.”

“But a President Biden in cognitive decline will sooner or later be replaced by his unpopular, untested vice president, Kamala Harris.”

“Saddled with a recession and policies that will only exacerbate economic decline, the next four years will hobble Democrats.”

“Their flaws and hypocrisy will be on full display, with a good chance of the 2024 presidential race being won by one of the new generation of Republican heirs to Trumpism.”

“Whoever wins this election, the result is a humiliation for the Trump-deranged media and the tame pollsters who provide them with the justification for their dishonest political narrative.”

“Let history record that on the Sunday before the election, The New York Times declared that ‘all 15’ of their columnists suffer from mandatory Trump Derangement Syndrome.”

“Whoever wins, this election has exposed the frauds and liars who pose as our elites, and [at least] half of America won’t forget it.”

I sure won’t.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please let me know by “clicking” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts. 

We’re all entitled to our opinions.  I value yours and your feedback as well.

I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Are you a “Chump for Trump?”

Why do these democrats always have to resort to name-calling, especially when it comes to large groups of fellow Americans?

We’ve seen the mainstream media refer to Trumpers as “uneducated hicks,” “gun toting and Bible toting racists,” and “ignorant idiots” who are worthy of being laughed at.   

Hillary Clinton referred to the conservative half of the country as “irredeemable” and as “deplorables.”

Now we have Joe Biden calling Trump supporters “Chumps.”

Out of one side of his mouth Biden says he will represent all Americans if he becomes president, then he turns around and calls Trump supporters “chumps.”

So, the “chumps” are supposed to believe that Biden will have their best interests at heart?

You can say what you want about President Trump, and people complain about President Trump’s language all of the time, but I never recall him referring to democrat voters as any derogatory type of name.   

Naomi Lim, for The Washington Examiner, reports that, “Biden lashes out at ‘chumps’ heckling him during Pennsylvania rally.”

I thought he liked protesters?

I thought he went out of his way to insure people’s right to protest?

Or was that their “right” to riot, burn, and loot?  

“Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden aired his frustration with protesters in Pennsylvania, resorting to name-calling 10 days before Election Day.”

“I’ll work as hard for those who don’t support me as those who do — including those chumps with the microphone out there,’ Biden said Saturday during a drive-in rally in Bucks County.”

Like I said before, he talks out of both sides of his mouth…, and both sides lie just as bad as the other side.  

 “Critics were quick to compare Biden’s off-handed comment to 2016 Democratic standard-bearer Hillary Clinton’s ‘deplorables’ remark.”

‘“A sequel to Hillary’s snobby ‘deplorable’ & ‘irredeemable’ riff. They still think so little of so many Americans,’ former White House counselor Kellyanne Conway tweeted.”

“In 2016, Clinton claimed ‘half of Trump’s supporters, could be placed in what she described as a ‘basket of deplorables.’”

‘“The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately, there are people like that. And he has lifted them up,’ she said.”

You forgot pedophiles, sexual deviants and sexual predators, Hillary.

Oh…, I’m sorry, I forgot those are a democrat thing!

“The Bucks County stop north of Philadelphia was one of two Biden events on Saturday. Biden defended his energy policy at both events after saying during the second and final debate that he ‘would transition from the oil industry.’”

‘“Let me get something straight here in coal country: I will not ban fracking, period,’ Biden said in Luzerne County. ‘I will protect Pennsylvania jobs, period. No matter how many times Donald Trump says it.’”

That sounds a lot like when he and Obama when they said, “You can keep your doctor, period.”

That whole “period” thing, to emphasize an obvious falsehood, is really getting old, Joe.    

You must think we’re all as dumb as your son, Hunter!

Ouch!

“Trump supporters could be heard loudly chanting, ‘Four more years,’ over Biden earlier this month in Toledo, Ohio.”

Ha, that’s funny.  I don’t recall hearing about that before.

I wonder why?

You can see why they want to keep Joe hidden, down in his basement, until after the election.

I am proud to proclaim that I’m one of Trump’s “deplorable” “Chumps!”

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please let me know by “clicking” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts. 

We’re all entitled to our opinions.  I value yours and your feedback as well.

I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑