Tag: Trump

Democrats proclaim, “Black Lives Matter!” Really?

Seriously?

Really?

Most recently, Illinois Governor J. B. Pritzker, and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, have been fighting to keep federal crime assistance, offered by President Trump, out of Chicago.

These “concerned” politicians prefer the status quo, which was 58 people shot and 8 killed over the Labor Day weekend, and dozens shot and killed over any other normal weekend, not to mention those shot and killed during the week!

Black communities bear the brunt of these shootings and killings.

But Pritzker and Johnson say crime statistics are improving, and they don’t want, or need help.

What do you think the families and friends of the hundreds of people who have been shot, and the families and friends of the hundreds of people in Chicago would have to say about that?

Pritzker and Johnson call on their democrat friends to “stand up and fight” against “federal occupation,” and to “defend the land” against President Trump.

Really?

Again, these “concerned” politicians prefer 58 people shot and 8 killed over the Labor Day weekend, and dozens shot and killed over any other normal weekend, not to mention those shot and killed during the week, and expect the people of Chicago to follow suit?

Since when did sacrificing the lives of these people to criminals on a daily basis become acceptable, and become the norm?

I believe the sane residents of Chicago would beg to differ.

So, do these democrat politicians still believe black lives matter?

I would ask, “matter” in what way exactly, because these black lives don’t seem to be worth saving in their eyes.

In case you don’t believe my premise of black lives being effected the most by this senseless crime in Chicago, in an article from April 12, 2022, for The Heritage Foundation, Giancarlo Canaparo and Abby Kassal ask, “Who Suffers the Most from the Crime Wave?”

“African Americans bear an increasingly large share of the harm from crime.”

“The spike in crime is hurting a lot of people, and black communities bear the heaviest burden.”

“Violent crime, like the price of gas, is rising. Not everyone is experiencing this crime wave in the same way. For some, it’s a distant issue experienced by other people somewhere else. For others, it’s a daily life-threatening concern.”

“We parsed the FBI’s crime data from 2011 to 2020 (the most recent data available) and found that African Americans bear an increasingly large share of the harm from crime. African American offenders, meanwhile, are committing an increasingly large share of violent crimes.”

“For other racial groups, the numbers are either decreasing (in the case of both white victims and offenders), increasing by much smaller amounts, or holding constant.”

“According to federal crime data, the number of violent crimes has increased by almost 50% over the last 10 years. In 2011, the FBI reported 314,907 violent offenses. In 2020, there were 640,836.”

“The most striking figure in the data is the spike in reported homicides, which tripled from 3,549 offenses in 2011 to 10,440 offenses in 2020.”

“The picture that federal crime data provide is bad, but the reality of crime in the United States is even worse. The FBI’s data is not complete. It relies on local law enforcement agencies across the country to voluntarily share their local data with the FBI. Not all do.”

Or, the data is manipulated, ala Washington D.C., to make it seem better than it really is.  

“Although the National Incident-Based Reporting System is not complete, it provides useful insights into who suffers from and who commits crime because it tracks demographic data about both sets of people.”

“We utilized the FBI’s crime data to compare victim statistics to determine which groups have been most impacted by the rise in violent crime. Factoring out the cases in which the race of the victim was unknown, we calculated who has borne the brunt of the crime wave.”

“For this analysis, violent crime includes assault, homicide, and sex offenses. We found that the increase in these crimes has fallen hardest on black people.”

“The most significant changes, therefore, were that black people represent an increasing share of violent crime victims…”

“The true size of the problem is made starker when we consider that African Americans make up only 14.2% of the total population (including multiracial populations who identify as black “in combination” with another race), but 32.7% of all violent crime victims and 54.4% of homicide victims. Thus, these small percentages represent an enormous problem that, for black people, is getting worse, both in relative and absolute terms.”

Regardless…, the spike in crime is hurting a lot of people, and black communities bear the heaviest burden.

Democrats across the country oppose President Trump’s desire to make our cities safer places to live and work. The democrats prefer to fight for the rights criminals and ignore the devastating impact crime is having on their constituents.

How these democrats keep winning elections in our big cities is beyond me.

I guess, in the end, you get what you deserve, but President Trump is determined to improve the lives of the people in these big democrat run cities, whether they appreciate it or not.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

The Swamp was Swilling Taxpayer Money like Pigs at the Trough!

Yes, my friends. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has revealed a virtual unending amount of waste and abuse of our taxpayer dollars by these swamp monsters and their anti-America socialist piglets everywhere.

To the tune of billions and billions and billions of our taxpayer dollars.

In the simplest of terms, innumerable (mostly democrat) parasites have been stealing our money.

When I hear the DOGE team describe just some of their findings it literally makes me sick.

Imagine, if you will, thousands and thousands of “wolves of Wall Street” partying on our dime like it was 1999.

They had absolutely no respect for the people they were supposed to be working for, or any sense of accountability for the money they had no problem squandering away. 

It’s no wonder the democrats are all up in arms over President Trump, Elon Musk, and the DOGE team.

These people are like crack addicts who have been forced to go cold turkey, with the added worry of possibly being held legally accountable for their years, even decades, of theft and abuse.

This explains why they’re willing to fund as many protests as it takes, while expending political capital left and right, regardless of popular opinion.

Congressman Craig Goldman, of Texas, posted the following on his website:

“Alongside President Donald Trump, I am committed to eliminating wasteful and fraudulent federal government spending. With over $36 trillion in national debt, reckless government overspending must end. I have put together a non-exhaustive list of taxpayer dollars spent under the Biden administration. This list has been identified through the incredible work of the White House, executive agencies, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and my colleagues in the U.S. Congress. I will be updating this tracker regularly to show how taxpayer dollars were poorly spent.”

“The list below includes taxpayer dollars channeled through agencies such as the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), U.S. Department of State (DOS), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Inter-American Foundation (IAF), National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. African Development Foundation (USADF), and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).”

The following is just a list of DOGE’s initial findings.

“$22,600,000,000 (HHS) – Aiding illegal migrants through resettlement programs, home and car purchases, and loans

$7,500,000,000 (DOT) – Funding a few dozen electric vehicle stations across the nation

$7,000,000,000 (EPA) – Funding green energy projects that reduce greenhouse gases and promoting the adoption of green alternatives nationwide

$5,000,000,000 (EPA) – Funding green energy projects that reduce gas emissions and supporting green banks

$2,000,000,000 (EPA) – Funding projects to decarbonize American housing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

$382,000,000 (DOL) – Issuing fraudulent unemployment payments to tens of thousands of individuals, including those with birthdates in the future, infants, and people listed as 115 years old

$312,000,000 (SBA) – Providing business loans for children 11 years old and under

$59,000,000 (FEMA) – Supplying services and housing for illegal immigrants in New York City

$46,500,000 (DOS) – Funding projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil

$43,300,000 (USAID) – Supporting programs to build an inclusive and capable workforce, with a special emphasis on public health and climate change sectors in Egypt

$35,900,000 (USAID) – Funding positive youth experience in Gaza

$31,000,000 (USAID) – Supporting the transition to clean energy with energy supplies in Europe and Eurasia

$26,300,000 (USAID) – Supporting higher education in Egypt

$24,000,000 (USAID) – Promoting “resilient livelihoods” in Gaza

$17,500,000 (USAID) – Supporting male circumcision and condom programs

$17,300,000 (USAID) – Providing the Diversity and Inclusion Scholarship Program to students in Burma

$13,200,000 (USAID) – Supporting biodiversity programs in Liberia

$12,200,000 (DOL) – Promoting worker empowerment in South America

$11,000,000 (USAID) – Producing the Middle Eastern version of Sesame Street in Iraq

$10,300,000 (USAID) – Supporting male circumcision programs in Mozambique

$9,000,000 (USAID) – Stolen humanitarian aid by Al-Qaida-affiliated terrorists

$8,300,000 (USAID) – Building worker power for equity and justice

$8,300,000 (USAID) – Funding USAID education on equity and inclusion

$8,000,000 (EPA) – Funding an organization to address environmental and energy justice issues

$6,200,000 (NIH) – Studying the effects of asthma on transgender individuals in the U.S.

$6,000,000 (DOD) – Funding the University of Montana to “strengthen American democracy by bridging divides”

$6,000,000 (DOD) – Funding a grant to decarbonize emissions from Navy ships

$5,900,000 (NIH) – Funding for a TransHealthGUIDE for gender-diverse young adults

$5,700,000 (DOS) – Supporting programs for LGBTQ+ individuals in Latin America and the Caribbean

$5,200,000 (DOD) – Funding a grant to diversify the Navy

$5,100,000 (NIH) – Testing the effects of cross-sex hormone therapy on transgender individuals in the U.S.

$4,900,000 (USAID) – Funding youth programs with a focus on reproductive health and the intersection of youth and gender equity

$4,700,000 (DOL) – Promoting international labor standards in Ecuador

$4,000,000 (EPA) – Building a one-room museum inside the EPA

$3,500,000 (DOD) – Supporting DEI groups through the Defense Human Resources Activity

$3,300,000 (DOD) – Unionized health workers in the Department of Defense’s Defense Health Agency spent $3,300,000 and 87,000 hours doing union-related work instead of their federal jobs

$2,900,000 (NIH) – Studying HIV prevention for transgender women and their male partners

$2,500,000 (NIH) – Studying the impact of structural racism on the health of older gay men

$2,500,000 (USAID) – Supporting green energy businesses in Vietnam

$2,000,000 (USAID) – Supporting gender-affirming healthcare and LGBTQ+ advocacy in Guatemala

$1,900,000 (DOD) – Providing holistic diversity, equity, and inclusion transformation and training for the Air Force

$1,600,000 (NIH) – Testing the reproductive health of transgender individuals in the U.S.

$1,600,000 (DOD) – Funding a University of Florida study on the “social and institutional detriments of vulnerability and resilience to climate hazards in [the] African Sahel.”

$1,500,000 (USAID) – Promoting DEI business policies and LGBTQ+ entrepreneurship in Serbia

$1,200,000 (USAID) – Funding choice, equity, and sustainability programs

$910,000 (NIH) – Testing the effects of “gender-affirming” hormone therapy on the immune system in the U.S.

$900,000 (IAF) – Supporting alpaca farming in Peru

$755,000 (NIH) – Testing the effects of “gender-affirming” hormone therapy on bone development in the U.S.

$731,000 (IAF) – Improving the commercial viability of mushroom and pea farming in Guatemala

$677,000 (IAF) – Promoting fruit and jam sales in Honduras

$600,000 (USDA) – Supporting a study on the menstrual cycles in transgender men

$599,000 (NIH) – Testing the risk of breast cancer for transgender men in the U.S.

$483,000 (IAF) – Supporting the production of artisanal salt in Ecuador

$400,000 (DOS) – Supporting LGBTQ+ sensitivity trainings for police forces in Nigeria

$374,000 (USDA) – Hiring a DEI onboarding specialist at the USDA

$325,000 (HHS) – Adapting LGB+ teen pregnancy prevention program for transgender boys

$323,000 (IAF) – Promoting cultural support for Venezuelan migrants in Brazil

$300,000 (DOS) – Promoting acceptance for LGBTQ+ people in Botswana

$298,000 (USDA) – Promoting international development for underrepresented communities

$246,000 (USADF) _ Funding mango drying facilities in the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire

$239,000 (USADF) – Promoting pineapple juice in Benin

$229,000 (USDA) – Hiring a Brazilian forest and gender consultant at the USDA

$229,000 (USADF) – Funding the promotion of 100% organic shea butter in Burkina Faso

$209,000 (DOS) – Funding an international study trip on LGBTQ+ advocacy

$185,000 (DOS) – Promoting the empowerment of lesbian and bisexual women in Belize

$99,500 (USADF) – Supporting increased production of yogurt in Uganda

$84,000 (USADF) – Supporting a business incubator for spa and wellness entrepreneurs in Nigeria

$70,000 (DOS) – Producing a DEI music event in Ireland

$68,000 (DOS) – Funding dance class workshops in China

$32,000 (DOS) – Creating an LGBTQ+ comic book in Peru

$29,000 (USDA) – Hiring a Central American gender assessment consultant at the USDA

$25,000 (DOS) – Funding a transgender opera in Colombia”

A stunning list, isn’t it?

And please understand that most of the money listed here never made it to the idiotic funding listed, but was either rerouted or kicked back to a long list of corrupt swamp monsters.

Nor does this even include the immense fraud uncovered at the IRS, Medicare, and Medicaid.

Thank God for President Trump.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

The Rebirth of America!

Yes, my friends. We are experiencing a true rebirth of America.

Just like the original American patriots who stood up, led by General George Washington, against all odds, to the mighty British empire, modern day American patriots stood up against the cabal of the democrat party, the propagandist mainstream media, fascist governmental “lawfare,” and a flood of anti-American money, to elect Donald Trump in the election of November of 2024.

I believe as time goes by, Donald Trump will be revered as the “Father” of the rebirth of the United States, just as George Washington is revered as the original “Father” of our country.

I also believe that Elon Musk will be viewed as a modern day founding father, similar to Benjamin Franklin.

Benjamin Franklin, one of the founding fathers of our nation, was a writer, scientist, inventor, statesman, diplomat, printer, publisher and political philosopher who gave his time and his intellect to his country.

Like Ben Franklin, Elon Musk has given his time and expertise for the good of his adopted home.

Whereas Washington battled the British “red coats” with his blue coated rebels, President Trump’s red-hatted MAGA patriots are in a constant political and moral battle with the designated blue democrats.

Washington fought for the ideals in The Declaration of Independence.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.”

Like Washington, President Trump is also fighting for these same ideals, again, 250 years later.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

Has anyone actually been charged with “insurrection” regarding January 6th?

The “insurrection” word gets thrown around ALL the time by democrats, but the truth is NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

Let me say that again.

NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

Although hundreds of Americans have been charged with various other crimes, regarding the events of January 6th, NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

Let me say that again.

NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

You may wonder how that could possibly be, and the answer is probably because it, in reality, was not an “insurrection,” at least by the protesters and rioters that have been targeted by The Department of inJustice.

Kaylee McGhee White, for The Washington Examiner writes, “Reminder: Not one person involved in Jan. 6 riot has been charged with ‘insurrection.’”

“For all the Democrats’ talk of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot being an ‘insurrection,’ it’s important to remember that not one person involved in the riot has been charged with that crime.”

“My colleague Jerry Dunleavy writes, ‘One year after the Capitol riot, no one has been charged with sedition or insurrection, despite initial Justice Department claims that such charges were likely and former President Donald Trump being impeached for allegedly inciting an insurrection.’”

“Surely, if the rioters’ actions were as seditious and Trump’s foolishness [their words, not mine] was as dangerous as Democrats have claimed, we’d be seeing criminal charges that reflect the seriousness of those alleged crimes. But that hasn’t happened.”

“According to the Justice Department, more than 225 defendants had been charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding law enforcement officers; at least 275 defendants have been charged with obstructing a congressional proceeding; and about 40 defendants have been charged with some sort of conspiracy charge.”

“But, again, no one has been charged with sedition or insurrection.”

Let me say that again.

NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

“Perhaps that’s why the vast majority of voters on both the Left and the Right don’t agree with Democrats’ characterization of the Capitol riot as an insurrection. A CBS News poll released this week found that 70% of the people who voted for President Joe Biden and 84% of the people who voted for Trump considered the Capitol riot to be a ‘protest that went too far.’”

Now we see multiple states attempting to keep President Trump off of this November’s ballot because he, according to their belief, “incited an insurrection” on January 6th.

The same January 6th where NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH, INCLUDING PRESIDENT TRUMP.  

In truth, President Trump offered to deploy 10,000 National Guard troops to the Capitol that day, but his offer was rejected by Pelosi, who as the Speaker of the House at the time, was in charge of Capitol security.

Now why would she do that?

The idea has been floated she denied troops to help with security because “it would not have been a good look.”

But the Capitol surrounded by fences and razor wire and troops after the fact was a good look?

In reality, I believe she did not want the troops there because they would have actually kept the protestors in line, which was contrary to what Pelosi, and her counterparts, the FBI, desired.  

It has been well documented that FBI operatives incited the protestors to march on and enter the Capitol building, and even assisted them with their entry.

All so Pelosi and the democrats could use this event to further their never ending parade of witch hunts against President Trump, and further promote their narrative of the evil MAGA contingency.  

And, why was Nancy Pelosi, who was responsible for Capitol security, never brought before the January 6th Committee to testify?   

I think we all know the answer to that question.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

The “Shot” heard around the world! Mug shot that is.

The former President, Donald J. Trump, sure doesn’t look worried.

He doesn’t look intimidated either.

I would say he looks pi$$ed off, and that these people should be careful what they wish for, because payback’s a b*tch.

Jonathan J. Cooper, for The Associated Press, reports, “One image, one face, one American moment: The Donald Trump mug shot.”

“A camera clicks. In a fraction of a second, the shutter opens and then closes, freezing forever the image in front of it.”

“When the camera shutter blinked inside an Atlanta jail on Thursday, it both created and documented a tiny inflection point in American life.”

A huge inflection point, in my estimation.  

“Captured for posterity, there was a former president of the United States, for the first time in history, under arrest and captured in the sort of frame more commonly associated with drug dealers or drunken drivers. The trappings of power gone, for that split second.”

“Left behind: an enduring image that will appear in history books long after Donald Trump is gone.”

You can say that again.

‘“It will be forever part of the iconography of being alive in this time,’ said Marty Kaplan, a professor at the University of Southern California Annenberg School of Communications.”

Ooookay, agreed…, but did we really need a quote from some unknown professor from some unknown school to state the obvious here?  Just sayin’.   

“In a historic moment for American history, former President Donald Trump becomes the first president to have a booking photo released, and is also the first former president to be criminally charged.”

“In the photo, Trump confronts the camera in front of a bland gray backdrop, his eyes meeting the lens in an intense glare. He’s wearing a blue suit, white shirt and red tie, his shoulders squared, his head tilted slightly toward the camera. The sheriff’s logo has been digitally added above his right shoulder.”

“Some of the 18 others charged with him in Georgia smiled in their booking photos like they were posing for a yearbook. Not Trump. His defiance is palpable, as if he’s staring down a nemesis through the lens.”

Like I said, I would say he looks pi$$ed off, and that these people should be careful what they wish for, because payback’s a b*tch.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in 2024?

I haven’t heard much about this potential ticket in 2024, but I think it’s worth some consideration and discussion.

Hanna Trudo, writing for “The Hill,” TheHill.com website, reported that RFK Jr. said, “‘I’m proud that President Trump likes me.’”

No wonder the democrat powers that be are treating RFK Jr. like the plague! At least like a plague they weren’t responsible for! Ouch!

“Robert F. Kennedy Jr. [has] refused to criticize former President Trump…, and said he was flattered by recent comments from Trump praising him as a ‘common-sense guy.’”

“Asked by moderator Elizabeth Vargas [during a NewsNation town hall event] what Kennedy thinks about Trump, Kennedy said, ‘I’m not going to attack other people personally.’”

“He then went a step further, expressing pride that he has received positive affirmations recently from Trump, who is embroiled in legal troubles as the leading Republican presidential contender in the GOP primary. He also referred to the former president in present tense.”

‘“I’m proud that President Trump likes me,’ he said.”

“Trump was the latest figure on the right to defend Kennedy in an appearance this week on ‘The Howie Carr Show.’”

‘“Just hang in,’ Trump advised Kennedy. ‘He’s been very nice to me, I’ve actually had a very nice relationship with him over the years. He’s a very smart guy, and a good guy.’”

‘“He’s a common sense guy and so am I. So, whether you’re conservative or liberal, common sense is common sense,’ he added.”

Wow. “Commons sense” and democrat have typically been mutually exclusive terms in recent years. Although I have to believe there are still some democrats out there who haven’t completely lost it, like most of their counterparts.  

“Kennedy avoiding the opportunity to criticize Trump was the latest sign that the presidential contender is walking a fine line between both the Democratic and Republican parties.”

“Some Democrats are worried Kennedy could run as an independent in the general election, potentially pulling votes from Biden and helping Trump.”

I seriously doubt that RFK Jr. would run as an independent, but I believe he might consider a run with Donald Trump.

And I believe former President Trump could see the value of bringing RFK Jr. on board with him.

Any other vice presidential candidate he could select from the republicans would not really have the capability of expanding his voting base. RFK Jr., who has been polling quite well, could potentially bring an additional 10% block of voters, or more, to Trump’s campaign.

This valuable 10% could be a big enough voting group to counteract an attempt by the democrats to steal another election.

The Kennedy name still carries some weight among democrats, independents, and even some conservatives.

Many conservatives would say this may be a four year answer, but what about the four years after that? My answer would be we can’t lose the next election worrying about the 2028 election.

RFK Jr.’s stance may differ from Trump’s and conservatives on some issues, but I believe they have more in common than not. And who says a VP has to be in complete lockstep with The President?

“Kennedy’s approach to Trump is markedly different approach than Biden and the majority of Democrats, who have cast the former president as a threat to the constitution and democracy.”

It is common knowledge that RFK Jr. is no friend of “the deep state,” in keeping with his father’s beliefs, as well as his uncle’s, JFK’s, beliefs.

The rift between Bobby Kennedy and J. Edgar Hoover, the head of the FBI at the time, is well documented.

Robert Kennedy Jr. would fit right in with Trump and his efforts to cleanse the government’s agencies of little dictators who believe they are above the law and above the scrutiny of the people’s elected representatives.  

I would support a Trump/RFK Jr. ticket, and I hope former President Trump gives this ticket some serious consideration.

How about you?    

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

1

“All in all, you’re just another brick in the wall.”

Prophetic lyrics from the song “Another Brick in The Wall” by the band Pink Floyd (1979. That’s 44 years ago!):

“We don’t need no education

We don’t need no thought control

No dark sarcasm in the classroom

Teachers leave them kids alone

Hey! Teachers! Leave us kids alone!

All in all it’s just another brick in the wall.

All in all you’re just another brick in the wall.”

So, who’s “another brick in the wall,” and what’s “the wall?”

In my mind, “the wall” is the metaphorical “wall,” or political construct,   of misinformation, disinformation, and the promotion of an anti-constitutional, fascist, government.

Also, in my opinion, you’re currently “a brick” in that “wall,” if you (in no particular order)…:

…Condone schools indoctrinating our children towards a particular political activism

…Condone teachers and schools acting behind the backs of parents

…Condone the democrat weaponization of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

…Believe it was okay for the FBI to raid, with over a couple dozen heavily armed agents, former President Trump’s home, but not the homes, or offices of our current president, or other former presidents

…Believe law-abiding and responsible gun owners should be disarmed, while believing criminals will follow any type of additional gun laws

…Believe that “climate change” is the biggest problem we currently face

…Believe that our government generally tells us the truth

…Believe that the mainstream media generally tells us the truth

…Believe that Covid-19 mandates really “followed the science,” were justified, and that it was a pandemic of the unvaccinated

…Believe that there is no problems with our current election systems, procedures, and accountability

…Believe that criminals have more rights than law-abiding citizens, and that they deserve to be released again, and again, and again to repeatedly victimize innocent citizens

…Believe pedophilia (the sexual abuse of children) is an acceptable lifestyle choice

…Condone the abortion of (the ruthless and brutal killing of) babies right up to the moment of birth (which currently occurs about 3,000 times a day)

…Promote divisive racism, and use racism as an explanation for virtually every problem we face as a country

…Are willing to commit economic suicide here at home, in an effort to weaken our world standing

…Believe that allowing millions and millions of illegal immigrants to flood our country is acceptable

…Don’t support the continued construction of an actual wall along our southern border

…Believe it is acceptable for our country to provide a multitude of benefits to illegal immigrants, while we already have a severe homeless problem, and a dereliction of our responsibilities to our veterans     

…Don’t really believe most of these things, but promote this evil ideology for monetary gain anyway   

I’m sure I have left out many additional reasons one could be considered a “brick in the wall.” If you’d like to add to the discussion, please leave me a comment, which myself and others reading the blog could consider.

I hope you’re not a “brick.”

If you think you might be, remember, it’s never too late to walk away from the “dark side.”

It is all of our duties to continue to fight against the construction off this metaphorical “wall,” and to fight against the “bricklayers” who continuously try and keep building it.

I know it can get tiring at times, but these “bricklayers” never take a day, or an hour, or even a minute off, so we can’t either.

Please note that anyone from technically any political party can be a “brick in the wall,” but that these characteristics are typically in-line with the democrat party ideology and narrative.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

Donald Trump Has My Unconditional Support!         

The democrats have managed to stoke the fires of my political resolve, as has President Trump.

Watching Donald Trump’s speech from Mar-a-Lago, after returning from the legal circus in morally and legally bankrupt New York City, I need to reaffirm a few things:

President Trump is a unicorn, politically speaking. There is NO leading politician like him…, even remotely like him.

He is only interested in the best interests of our country and its people. This is quite a rare attribute.

President Trump speaks plainly, and he speaks the truth. What a novel idea for a politician.

President Trump is a remarkable person. He has taken the slings and arrows of a relentless opposition, and he is a tireless fighter for himself, his family, and the rest of us, and he deserves our appreciation and support.

Thank you, Mr. President, for refusing to give up on our country and the American ideal.

You are a hero to millions of Americans, and deservedly so.

I honestly don’t know how you do it, but I am eternally grateful you’re willing to make the effort on behalf of your country.

The democrats have “called down the thunder,” and now Trump and the MAGA patriots are coming, “and hell is coming with us.”

If our country is to be saved, Donald Trump would be the one who could do it.

Again, you have my unconditional support, Mr. President.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

Is America going “Bananas?”

I would say there is no doubt that some of our fellow Americans are losing it, but that’s not what we’re talking about here.

In June of 2020, Author Robin Wright asked, for “The New Yorker,” no less, “Is America Becoming a Banana Republic?”

I don’t think she knew at the time how prophetic that question would be.

“In the early nineteen-hundreds, the American writer O. Henry coined the term “banana republic” in a series of short stories…”

“The term, which originally referred to a politically unstable country run by a dictator and his cronies…, took on a life of its own.”

“Over the past century, “banana republic” has evolved to mean any country (with or without bananas) that has a ruthless, corrupt, or just plain ‘loopy’ leader who relies on the military [in our case the state police, the DOJ and the FBI, with the cooperation of some kangaroo courts thrown in there] and destroys state institutions…”

“During the heated Presidential campaign of 2016, the term made its way into mainstream American politics, often glibly. President Trump invoked it in October, 2016. ‘This election will determine whether we remain a free country in the truest sense of the word or we become a corrupt banana republic controlled by large donors and foreign governments,’ he told a cheering crowd in Florida.”

Truer words were never spoken.

“The House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi (at the time), the third most powerful politician in the land, described the experience of her daughter, a filmmaker and journalist, when men in fatigues used chemical agents and body armor to force her fellow peaceful protesters aside so Trump could walk to St. John’s Church, on Monday night, for a fleeting photo op where he waved the Bible. On Wednesday, Pelosi bluntly asked, on MSNBC’s ‘Morning Joe,’ ‘What is this, a banana republic?’”

Ha! Just wait Nancy! You will show us all what kind of banana republic we have, when you surround the capitol with fencing and armed reservists to supposedly protect yourselves from your own concocted “insurrection!”

“Later that day, James Mattis, the former Defense Secretary, issued a scathing rebuke of President Trump, his former boss.”

Boy, what a disappointment Mattis turned out to be. A real sell-out. And that’s coming from a marine myself.

“Mattis described being ‘angry and appalled’ at the use of the U.S. military against the American people.”

Again, hang onto your hat General Mattis, because you ain’t seen nothing yet!

‘“When I joined the military, some fifty years ago, I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the Constitutional rights of their fellow citizens, much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside,” he said, in a statement to The Atlantic.”

Like I said, you ain’t seen nothing yet, General! Talk about a “bizarre photo op!” The democrat contrived January 6th “insurrection” was one long running “bizarre photo op!

“Pictures of National Guard troops arrayed in tight rows on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, a site that symbolizes reconciliation and healing after our Civil War, clad in camouflage, flak jackets, and body armor, added to the sense that America is in the midst of a defining national crisis. Mattis raged at the President personally, accusing him of deliberately trying to divide the country.”

Ha! That’s a real hoot!

‘“We know that we are better than the abuse of executive authority that we witnessed in Lafayette Square,’ he said. He went one big step further, demanding that ‘those in office who would make a mockery of our Constitution’ must be held accountable.”

Yes. We’re all waiting for Pelosi and the democrats to be held responsible for the grand January 6th charade.

“Scholars and current and former policymakers say that Trump’s historical legacy increasingly appears to be the undoing of American democracy. ‘We are far too complacent about the durability of our system,’ Robert Kagan, a historian at the Brookings Institution and the author of ‘The Jungle Grows Back: America and Our Imperiled World,’ told me (Seems like kind of a racist title, if you ask me.). ‘So much of what makes our system work is the general fidelity to a democratic ethos on the part of everybody involved.’”

Bingo!

We are all currently witnessing the democrats making their best efforts to “undo American democracy.”  

“Trump has proved that ‘our system has within it the capacity to be subverted,’ Kagan said. The brilliance of America’s Founders was designing a constitution with checks and balances to ensure that the instruments of power served the people and the Constitution, and limited the Presidency. ‘The founders hoped that Congress would be jealous of its prerogatives and the independent judiciary would be jealous of its role, and that each actor would have a certain devotion to the republican spirit, little “R,” and defend it against potential threats from a President more concerned for his own interests than the rights of the general population,’ Kagan said. ‘The amazing thing is that, throughout our history, that really has sort of been the case.’ No longer, he added. At the direction of President Trump, the core institutions that once insured the daily functions of the state and the peaceful transition of leadership have been seriously eroded.”

Wow.

Reading all of this two years later, it’s uncanny how all of these democrat tools and elitists are ending up describing themselves and their anti-American democrat friends!

“At the Department of Justice [inJustice], Attorney General William Barr overrode his own prosecutors in the sentencing of Roger Stone, a Trump ally. He urged that charges against Michael Flynn, Trump’s first short-lived national security adviser, be dropped, even though Flynn twice pleaded guilty to lying to the F.B.I. In the case of Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign manager, the President launched a Twitter tirade against Judge Amy Berman Jackson, including the false charge, ‘Is this the Judge that put Paul Manafort in SOLITARY CONFINEMENT, something that not even mobster Al Capone had to endure?’ Corrections officials, not judges, determine how and where prisoners are held. ‘If they can do that to protect the President’s friends, they can also be used against the President’s enemies,’ Kagan said.”

Oh, how we see that now!

You see, you can’t lie to the FBI, unless you’re a democrat. There are definitely two completely separate sets of rules, depending on where your politics lie.

‘“The clock is ticking on the future of America’s democracy,’ David Blight, a civil-war historian at Yale, told me. ‘This unrest, it’s more than unrest, it’s a revolt, is truly astonishing.’ In nine days, protesters have taken to the streets in three hundred and eighty cities over the death of George Floyd. ‘We have to find some way for electoral politics, ending just five months from now, to harness this, or where does it go? What’s left?’ He compared the deep political dysfunction in Washington in 2020 to the eighteen-fifties, when U.S. institutions were torn apart and the country collapsed in disunion. ‘There was no center left by 1860,’ he said. To answer Pelosi’s question, Blight said, ‘We’re not quite there yet. But we may be on the verge of becoming a banana republic. It was correct of her to ask the question.’”

Wow, was it ever. In fact, she was foreshadowing things to come, thanks to her and her democrat co-conspirators.

We have gone from finding the person who committed a crime, to finding a crime based on the person, or political target.

Now, that’s a real indicator of a “banana republic.”

It looks like we’ll have front row seats to the democrats’ legal circus, regarding former President Trump, for quite a while here, all while the “Biden crime family” is given a pass after pass from the Department of inJustice, and its resident treasonist in charge, Merrick Garland.

We’ve got banana republics, monkey business, and kangaroo courts! The democrats have created a real zoo out here!

Stay tuned.  

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

“Certified” Election Results?!

I keep hearing democrats crying about “election deniers,” and how the 2020 election results have been “certified,” yada, yada, yada.

“Certified” by who?

“Certified” by the same corrupt partisan officials who conducted the election in their respective cities and states, and then rubber stamped by other partisan politicians and partisan judges?   

According to Lisa Marshall, for the CU (Colorado University) Boulder Today, news publication, “In the days following the 2020 presidential election, as states re-counted and certified votes and President Joe Biden’s win became more objectively certain, Republicans, paradoxically, became less confident in the legitimacy of the vote, according to new CU Boulder research published today in the journal PLOS ONE.”

Note: PLOS ONE is a peer-reviewed open access mega journal published by the Public Library of Science since 2006. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine.

“The study also found that, regardless of political party, the more an individual consumed and trusted Fox News, the less faith he or she had in the electoral process.”

Could that be because the mainstream media stuck their heads in the sand and basically failed to report about any election abnormalities at all, while FOX at least addressed some of the issues and concerns?

Could that be why?   

‘“We have never seen this before in the weeks following Election Day: The more evidence accumulated that Biden won, the less confident Republicans became that the election was legitimate,’ said senior author Leaf Van Boven, a professor of psychology and neuroscience who studies judgment and decision making in politics. ‘In a healthy democracy, you would see that moving in the opposite direction, Democrats and Republicans would become more confident in the election’s legitimacy.’”

Yes, that would be nice, but the more we learned about the 2020 election, or better said “installation,” the less confidence we had it its legitimacy.

And, the reason “we have never seen this before in the weeks following Election,” is because we have never seen a presidential election stolen like this before!

“The study comes as some conservative thought leaders have begun to distance themselves from Fox News for giving voice to what they call ‘conspiracy theories,’ and two voting technology companies are suing the network for perpetuating claims the election was rigged.”

Haven’t we arrived at the point now where “conspiracy theories” really aren’t theories anymore?

And anyone can sue anybody for anything. The act of being sued should not be attributable to the questioning of integrity. “The study” makes biased assumptions, connections, and conclusions that are not really valid.     

And who gave the order to stop counting votes in the swing states on the night of November 3/4, 2020 by the way?

Just sayin’.  

“The new research relies on a psychological explanation, known as ‘cognitive dissonance theory,’ to explain the bizarre turn American politics has taken in the past year.”

Oh, really?

“Cognitive dissonance is when one’s personal attitudes and identities are inconsistent with their beliefs. To ease that discomfort, people rationalize the facts to restore consistency and turn to social networks to reaffirm that rationalization.”

I guess I would say we turned to social networks to validate our lying eyes with the lying eyes of others…, but, that’s just me.  

“After the 2020 election, the explanation for many was that the election must have been rigged [which it was], and the reaffirming social network was Fox News, Van Boven said, ‘If you expect your candidate to win and then your candidate loses, you are shoved into a state of cognitive dissonance. What you thought was supposed to happen doesn’t happen and that feels uncomfortable, so you make sense of it by rationalizing the outcome.’”

Or, when “what you thought was supposed to happen doesn’t happen, and that feels uncomfortable,” you blame the Russians!

Or, you recognize the actual chain of events, and refuse to be an election denier denier.

I don’t remember this being raised when Hillary lost, regarding democrats. I do remember Russian collusion being blamed, however. What would the resident eggheads call that?

Collusion delusion?

“For the study, the researchers took advantage of an unusual ‘natural experiment,’ a hotly contested election with an unprecedented number of mail-in and absentee ballots, which meant the outcome would not be known for days.”

You mean an election with an unprecedented number of UNVERIFIABLE and illegal mail-in and absentee ballots, that were conveniently discovered and counted in the middle of the night?

Those ballots?  

“They surveyed a diverse sample of 1,200 people and asked them how much faith they had that the votes were counted correctly. Half responded between Nov. 4 and 8, just after Election Day when many states’ vote counts had not been confirmed. Half took it between Nov. 9 and 15, after all states had confirmed counts, most media outlets had declared Biden the winner and Biden had delivered his acceptance speech.”

“Participants also reported how much they trusted and consumed 15 media outlets, including Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, USA Today and The Wall Street Journal.”

“As days passed, Republicans grew less confident that the votes were counted fairly, while Democrats grew more confident. Both findings are problematic, said Van Boven, ‘In healthy democracies, citizens are confident that votes were counted as intended regardless of who won.’”

That’s because “as days passed” we learned more about the democrats’ efforts to manipulate the vote, and the legal system’s choice to not address the problems with the vote at all.

We definitely cannot be considered a “healthy democracy” at this point.  

“The researchers were surprised to find that Republicans trusted and consumed only one of the 15 media outlets, Fox News, more than Democrats or Independents did. Democrats, in contrast, trusted and consumed all of the media outlets, except Fox News, more than Republicans or Independents.”

‘“If an individual trusted and consumed any of the other media outlets we measured, aside from Fox News, they trusted the election outcome more,’ said Van Boven.”

And that is because the “other media outlets” pumped out their dutiful propaganda about how this was the most secure election in history, which it obviously wasn’t.

“What made 2020 different? Studies have shown that voters whose candidate loses tend to temporarily lose faith that votes were counted correctly, but if the democracy is healthy losers ultimately consent. 2020 was different. Voters personally identified more closely with their political parties than in past elections, said author Dani Grant, a doctoral student in social psychology. ‘There is a lot more cognitive dissonance if you are not just dealing with disagreement about abstract policies, but you feel like your actual identity is under threat,’ said Grant.”

And it is.

Without fair elections, democracies aren’t democracies.  

Just a reminder that the Texas lawsuit questioning the validity of the 2020 election results was joined by more than a dozen state attorney generals, as well as more than 100 members of the U.S. House. This was a little more than a case of personal cognitive dissonance.

“Trump did not promptly concede, as George H.W. Bush, Al Gore, John McCain and Hillary Clinton did. And the media landscape had changed.”

And the way we accumulated and counted the votes had changed as well.

And why would President Trump “promptly concede” when the election was obviously being stolen from him?

“We now exist in a media landscape that is sharply polarized, and we need to take some initiative to seek more diversity. Otherwise, we may just be reaffirming our preexisting beliefs and notions to make us feel better.”

A diversity of truths?

How does that work?

Perhaps you should direct your concerns towards how our elections are conducted, rather than how the media portrays how our elections ae conducted.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑