And maybe the most shameful yet.
Imagine your grandpa is the president of the United States, and your grandma is the first lady of the United States, but they have chosen to pretend you don’t exist.
It’s a sad and shameful picture that no innocent child deserves.
I mean, we should allow Hunter to act like the piece of human garbage he is, but do Joe and Jill have to jump into that dumpster with him?
Jonathan Turley, for Fox News, a professor of public interest law at George Washington University and a practicing criminal defense attorney, reports that, “The Biden family refuses to acknowledge Hunter Biden’s 4-year-old daughter, and that Hunter Biden’s twisted attempts to keep his little girl from using his name are now in a new realm, and that the viciousness of the Biden family toward Hunter’s daughter, 4-year-old Navy Joan borders on monstrous.”
That’s pretty harsh wording, coming from Jonathan Turley, who is normally pretty measured with his assessments.
You may be thinking, “Oh, here comes another gold digging woman, trying to make a quick buck.” But it was Hunter who initiated this latest courtroom battle, as he seeks to lower his child support payments.
Of course he does. What a guy!
“Hunter Biden will finally make it to Arkansas. The state itself is not a favorite Biden family destination but there is one thing that would ordinarily be an attraction: [Hunter] Biden’s daughter Navy Joan.”
Being a grandparent myself, it is hard to understand the type of people who would turn their backs on their granddaughter.
“In the Biden family, the 4-year-old girl remains ‘she who shall not be named’ literally. Not only has President Biden refused to refer to her as a grandchild or even include a Christmas stocking with the other children, her father Hunter is fighting to prevent her from using the Biden name. Indeed, the only reason that Hunter is coming to the same state that his daughter lives in is to seek to reduce his child support.”
Hard to imagine anyone would want to “use” the Biden name, but be that as it may…
“The viciousness of the Biden family in dealing with this little girl is only matched by that of the media. Reporters who profess to support women and denounce deadbeat dads have either ignored this story or belittled her mother Lunden Roberts.”
Hmmm, that’s odd…, well, not really.
“Roberts is widely dismissed as a ‘former stripper.’ That appears to be how she met Hunter, but it is often used to paint her in the same way that the media gleefully reported on former first lady Hillary Clinton denouncing the women who were involved with her husband as mere ‘bimbo eruptions.’”
Being just a little bit judgmental, are we?
I guess only transsexuals in drag are currently allowed to be “exotic” dancers.
“Yes, Roberts was an exotic dancer. She used that job to go to one of the most expensive colleges in the country, George Washington University, where I teach.”
“The reason the media ignores Navy Joan’s mother, Lunden Roberts, is that it wants to ignore what the Bidens have done.”
“When she became pregnant, she decided to have her child and raise her on her own. She has raised this child without a father and fought one of the most powerful families in the world.”
Many of us would call this commendable, and brave.
“When Navy Joan is older, there is every reason for her to be proud of the struggle that her mother went through in seeking a college education and raising her against all odds.”
“Despite Joe Biden long campaigning against deadbeat dads, his son had refused to acknowledge that he was the father of Navy Joan.”
Deadbeat dads are easy targets…, until your son, your family moneymaker becomes one.
“After a court forced him to confirm his paternity through DNA testing, he continued to fight paying support for his child. Hunter’s delay and evasion of filings and depositions led a court to repeatedly threaten sanctions.”
Typical Biden family behavior, actually.
Didn’t this court realize who they were dealing with, and that normal laws don’t apply to the Bidens?
“However, the effort to bar this child from using the Biden name has moved this scandal from the realm of hypocrisy to monstrosity.”
“It is hard to imagine the pain that this child will experience upon learning of how the Bidens erased any reference to her and fought even her ability to claim to be a member of their family. (Even the Bidens’ dogs and cats got stockings at Christmas, but not their granddaughter Navy Joan, whom they have never asked to even see, let alone support.)”
“If one were to combine all of Hunter’s influence peddling, drug abuse, orgies and prostitution controversies, they would not hold a candle to the utter depravity shown toward this little girl.”
You mean the “alleged” influence peddling, drug abuse, orgies and prostitution controversies, right?
All of these infractions seem to be pretty common knowledge now, however.
“Despite assembling a new Legion of Doom of high-priced lawyers and advisers, Hunter is claiming that he simply cannot meet demands for child support.”
“Given his opposition to such support for years and reported millions in foreign dealings, it would seem transparently absurd.”
“It is even more difficult to accept this excuse as he jets between his luxurious mansion in Malibu to digs at the White House. The public reportedly pays more for his security in his mansion than he does for monthly support for his daughter.”
Aren’t we nice?
“There is, however, a crushing karmic aspect to Hunter being forced to appear in Arkansas. His efforts to limit his child support may have backfired and could prove costly.”
In the end, I seriously doubt it.
“Hunter has struggled to conceal his finances, including money that he received from alleged influence peddling. Now the court is considering the laptop as possible evidence in millions of past assets. While a U.S. Attorney in Delaware is exploring criminal charges and House committees are looking into the influence peddling, his fight against this toddler could force a decision on the authenticity of the laptop.”
Is that what you call slow-walking and looking the other way…, “exploring?”
“In the last hearing, Hunter’s counsel tried again to maintain deniability.”
“Here is the exchange after Judge Meyer referenced Garrett Ziegle as a potential expert witness on the contents of the laptop:”
“Langdon: ‘There has never been, to my knowledge, an acknowledgment that this so-called laptop, he continuously calls it Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop …’”
“Meyer: ‘Well, let’s clear that issue up right now. Is it your client’s laptop or not?’”
“Langdon: ‘Your honor, I’m not involved in all of that stuff. It’s not my client’s laptop as far as I know.’”
“Meyer: ‘Is it your client’s position, you’re representing to this court, that it is not his laptop?’”
“Langdon: ‘Your honor, I am not in a position to even begin to answer that question.’”
Deny, deny, deny. Lie, lie, lie…, straight out of the old democrat playbook.
“It is bizarre to continue this obfuscation years after the release of the laptop. Hunter is facing the use of the laptop as evidence in this case as well as the federal prosecution and House investigations. Yet, his counsel is still claiming ignorance as to whether it is authentic.”
“It is the continuation of a long campaign of disinformation. Before the 2020 election, the media repeated the false claim that the Hunter Biden laptop was likely ‘Russian disinformation.’”
“Despite the denial of American intelligence and self-verifying emails on the laptop, the media accepted without question [and promoted] the dubious claims of former intelligence figures organized by longtime Democratic operatives.”
“It worked beautifully.”
“It was not until two years later that NPR, the New York Times and other legacy media outlets got around to telling the public the truth.”
“Hunter has long refused to acknowledge ownership of the laptop. When asked years ago by CBS News, about its authenticity, he shrugged and said, ‘There could be a laptop out there that was stolen from me. It could be that I was hacked. It could be that it was Russian intelligence.’”
Yeah, “Maybe it’s something really cool that we don’t even know about. You know?”
“I thought we were in the trust tree, were we not?”
“In some ways, it is a continuation of Hunter’s long denial of his child’s paternity. Yet, the DNA did not lie.”
“Hunter could now be forced to accept this laptop as his own. That could prove far more costly than the child support that he is seeking to avoid in Arkansas.”
Like I said before, I doubt it. And if it does, Navy Joan will be in college, and Creepy Joe will just be a bad memory by that time.
“None of this, of course, will get Navy Joan a stocking on next year’s Biden family fireplace. According to Joe Biden, she is not one of his grandchildren despite being fathered by his own son.”
“Nor will this make Hunter Biden a better person. However, if she succeeds in using the Biden family name, she will certainly prove the best of the lot.”
You can say that again.
And by far!
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Thank you, MrEricksonRules.
Leave a Reply