I’ve recently seen these words on signs posted here and there.
My question is, who exactly is this “US” this person is referring to?”
If “US” refers to illegal immigrants, I would agree.
If “US” refers to the Chinese Communist Party, I would agree.
If “US” refers to the Mexican drug cartels, I would agree.
If “US” refers to the people on Jeffrey Epstein’s client list, and pedophiles everywhere, I would agree.
If “US” refers to all of these trans drag queens, who feel obligated to put on their disgusting shows in front of children, I would agree.
If “US” refers to the parents who feel it is okay to expose their children to all of these trans drag queens, who feel obligated to put on their disgusting shows for children, I would agree.
If “US” refers to those who feel it’s okay to eliminate Israel, and all Jewish people in general, I would agree.
If “US” refers to those who want to “buddy up” to Iran, and subsidize terrorism around the world, I would agree.
If “US” refers to those who prefer to subsidize despots around the globe by getting our oil from them, as opposed to supplying our own oil here at home, I would agree.
If “US” refers to those who feel it is preferable to keep letting serial criminals off time and time again, without holding them accountable for their actions, I would agree.
If “US” refers to those who feel it is appropriate to transfer the debt of college students onto the backs of other hard working Americans, I would agree.
If “US” refers to individuals who believe it is okay to weaponize the “justice” department against those who may have different political views from the party in power, I would agree.
If “US” refers to those who make the killing of innocent unborn babies their top priority, and are willing to overlook all of these other sins in order to maintain this ability, I would agree.
If “US” refers to people who believe it is okay for biological males to complete in women’ sports and infringe upon women’s restrooms and locker rooms, I would agree.
If “US” refers to people who don’t mind paying 20%, 30%, 40%, 50% more for food, gas, rent, utilities, or mortgages, I would agree.
I’m sure “US” could apply to many other undesirable ideals and individuals as well. Please add to the list via a comment if you feel I’ve left some group off.
We have a lot of confused and ignorant people in this country, as well as those who would intentionally promote the downfall of our country and our way of life.
We cannot let these democrats win.
If the democrats win, we all lose.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
That’s right…, you can take that mask off now. It doesn’t do any good anyway!
And you ain’t no Lone Ranger, no Batman, no Zorro, no Spiderman, and certainly no Captain America!
The fact of the matter is, the only people wearing masks now are criminals and chicken sh#t political activists.
That’s a fact, and we all know it.
Prior to the COVID scare, do you ever recall anyone wearing a mask, even for medical reasons?
That answer would be NO.
It is time we make the wearing of a mask illegal.
It can only help discourage some of these lowlifes from participating in some of these illegal activities, and some of these useful idiots from participating some of these in socially toxic “peaceful” protests, hateful marches, and neo-Nazi encampments.
If for some reason it is medically recommended you wear a mask, you can always have some “doctor ordered” paperwork.
Other than that, if you choose to wear a hajib around your head, it is generally not required that you cover your face.
Let’s end this face covering foolishness now.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Excuse me for being a little introspective today, but I recently heard this song again by Supertramp, and it made me think.
Here are the words to the song. What do you think?
“When I was young, it seemed that life was so wonderful
A miracle, oh, it was beautiful, magical
And all the birds in the trees, well they’d be singing so happily
Oh, joyfully, oh, playfully watching me
But then they sent me away to teach me how to be sensible
Logical, oh, responsible, practical
Then they showed me a world where I could be so dependable
Oh, clinical, oh, intellectual, cynical
There are times when all the world’s asleep
The questions run too deep
For such a simple man
Won’t you please, please tell me what we’ve learned?
I know it sounds absurd
Please tell me who I am
I said, now, watch what you say, they’ll be calling you a radical
A liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal
Oh, won’t you sign up your name? We’d like to feel you’re acceptable
Respectable, oh, presentable, a vegetable
But at night, when all the world’s asleep
The questions run so deep
For such a simple man…”
Life is really fairly simple.
But there are those that love to complicate things for their own benefit. “Those” being the government, elected and unelected, and “the haves.” These people are just interested in protecting their positions, power, and wealth.
Once we get to a certain age, we don’t have the luxury of being so care free anymore. We have responsibilities, and we are just trying to survive, and give ourselves and our families the best lives we can.
Most of us just want to feel safe and comfortable, but it seems that is too much to ask for now. “They” just can’t help themselves from demanding more, and more, until they ruin it for everyone, including themselves.
And, please be aware about the line that says “they’ll be calling you a liberal,” that conservatives are really the new “liberals,” while the democrats are all about being “the man” now.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Before I get started, I want to give my wife credit for this title. Nice one, Honey.
While we waited for “president” Biden to come out for his unscheduled press conference last Thursday night, my wife and I speculated what our fearless leader was going to say, given that earlier in the day the special counsel released their findings about their look into Biden’s handling of classified documents as a Senator, a vice president, a private citizen, and finally as president.
Would Biden say he had decided not to run for re-election?
Would Biden say he has decided to step down?
Glenn Thrush for The New York Times reported, “While Mr. Hur decided not to prosecute Mr. Biden, 81, [Did anyone ever actually think he would be prosecuted?] some of the reasoning he cited for his decision immediately created a new political crisis for the White House. In recounting his interviews with the president, Mr. Hur portrayed him as unable to remember key dates of his time in the Obama White House, or even precisely when his son Beau had died.”
“‘Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview with him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,’ Mr. Hur wrote.”
Is that really a thing? This is how they decide to prosecute people, or not, who have committed a crime(s)?
“The inquiry found that the president had willfully retained material after finishing his term as vice president and had shared sensitive information with a ghostwriter.”
So, Biden and his crew could argue against Mr. Hur’s findings, but then wouldn’t they be arguing against the reason Mr. Hur chose not to prosecute Clueless Joe?
Can they have it both ways?
Sorry. Stupid question.
It is a bit of a conundrum, but not for this bunch.
Instead of coming out in his interview and calmly and coolly thanking the special prosecutor for choosing to not prosecute him, while begging to differ on his cognitive assertions of him, he came out and attacked the special prosecutor and anyone else who questions his mental acuity, while then proceeding to confuse the President of Egypt with the President of Mexico.
I have to tell you, after watching Tucker Carlson’s interview of Vladimir Putin, and watching him talk off the script for over two hours, and seeing what an intelligent and sharp man he is, Mr. Putin, along with along with all of the other leaders and people around the world, must be having a good laugh at “president” Biden, America, and her people. You and I.
Thanks again “president” Biden.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
The “insurrection” word gets thrown around ALL the time by democrats, but the truth is NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.
Let me say that again.
NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.
Although hundreds of Americans have been charged with various other crimes, regarding the events of January 6th, NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.
Let me say that again.
NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.
You may wonder how that could possibly be, and the answer is probably because it, in reality, was not an “insurrection,” at least by the protesters and rioters that have been targeted by The Department of inJustice.
Kaylee McGhee White, for The Washington Examiner writes, “Reminder: Not one person involved in Jan. 6 riot has been charged with ‘insurrection.’”
“For all the Democrats’ talk of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot being an ‘insurrection,’ it’s important to remember that not one person involved in the riot has been charged with that crime.”
“My colleague Jerry Dunleavy writes, ‘One year after the Capitol riot, no one has been charged with sedition or insurrection, despite initial Justice Department claims that such charges were likely and former President Donald Trump being impeached for allegedly inciting an insurrection.’”
“Surely, if the rioters’ actions were as seditious and Trump’s foolishness [their words, not mine] was as dangerous as Democrats have claimed, we’d be seeing criminal charges that reflect the seriousness of those alleged crimes. But that hasn’t happened.”
“According to the Justice Department, more than 225 defendants had been charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding law enforcement officers; at least 275 defendants have been charged with obstructing a congressional proceeding; and about 40 defendants have been charged with some sort of conspiracy charge.”
“But, again, no one has been charged with sedition or insurrection.”
Let me say that again.
NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.
“Perhaps that’s why the vast majority of voters on both the Left and the Right don’t agree with Democrats’ characterization of the Capitol riot as an insurrection. A CBS News poll released this week found that 70% of the people who voted for President Joe Biden and 84% of the people who voted for Trump considered the Capitol riot to be a ‘protest that went too far.’”
Now we see multiple states attempting to keep President Trump off of this November’s ballot because he, according to their belief, “incited an insurrection” on January 6th.
The same January 6th where NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH, INCLUDING PRESIDENT TRUMP.
In truth, President Trump offered to deploy 10,000 National Guard troops to the Capitol that day, but his offer was rejected by Pelosi, who as the Speaker of the House at the time, was in charge of Capitol security.
Now why would she do that?
The idea has been floated she denied troops to help with security because “it would not have been a good look.”
But the Capitol surrounded by fences and razor wire and troops after the fact was a good look?
In reality, I believe she did not want the troops there because they would have actually kept the protestors in line, which was contrary to what Pelosi, and her counterparts, the FBI, desired.
It has been well documented that FBI operatives incited the protestors to march on and enter the Capitol building, and even assisted them with their entry.
All so Pelosi and the democrats could use this event to further their never ending parade of witch hunts against President Trump, and further promote their narrative of the evil MAGA contingency.
And, why was Nancy Pelosi, who was responsible for Capitol security, never brought before the January 6th Committee to testify?
I think we all know the answer to that question.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Isn’t that an odd way for AARP to begin an ad for itself?
So, they acknowledge many seniors don’t agree with their liberal stance on many social issues, but they should just overlook that for the sake of their social security.
“Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!”
Just keep shoveling money at us and our liberal “friends,” and we’ll take care of the rest.
In case you’re not familiar with them, AARP was formerly the American Association of Retired Persons, and is an interest group in the United States focusing on issues affecting those over the age of fifty. The organization, which is headquartered in Washington, D.C., said it had more than 38 million members as of 2018.
“Formerly?”
So, what exactly does it stand for now?
According to Bill McAllister, for The Washington Post, “AARP ALTERS NAME TO REFLECT REALITY.”
Ha! If they wanted to reflect reality they would have renamed themselves DEMSCAM!
“One of Washington’s most influential interest groups is changing its name.”
“The American Association of Retired Persons said yesterday it has decided it will be known by its acronym, AARP. When pronounced, the name rhymes with harp.”
That’s dumb.
“The reason for the change: Too many of the organization’s 38+ million members are still working, said spokeswoman Lisa Davis. The organization, which has been a major lobbying force on issues affecting senior citizens such as Social Security and Medicare, allows individuals as young as 50 to join its ranks.”
The more, the merrier, not to mention, the more, the more money.
It’s always about the money.
And with the democrats, it’s always about discrimination, as well. So, no one under 50 years of age is “allowed to join?”
How does that work?
It doesn’t even make sense.
Isn’t that age discrimination?
So, no one under 50 is interested in “protecting” social security and Medicare?
Just sayin’.
According to the website “Ballotpedia,” “AARP is tax exempt, and defines itself as follows:”
“AARP is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, with a membership of more than 37 million, that helps people turn their goals and dreams into real possibilities, strengthens communities and fights for the issues that matter most to families such as healthcare, employment security and retirement planning. We advocate for consumers in the marketplace by selecting products and services of high quality and value to carry the AARP name as well as help our members obtain discounts on a wide range of products, travel, and services.”
Who could ask for more?!
Please note: Any group that has tens of millions of dollars at its disposal, as well as the ability to influence political issues with millions of people, and at the same time claims to be nonpartisan, is lying.
And, “tax exempt?” Please.
Did you ever noticed how most organizations which promote a liberal point of view have gained tax exempt status?
Anyway, I digress.
“In an editorial column in the Los Angeles Times, critic Dale Van Atta says. ‘AARP does unauthorized lobbying for its membership, and lobbies against the best interests of its membership. Van Atta says that by lobbying for the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act, AARP leaders betrayed the membership.’”
So, “One of Washington’s most influential interest groups” “betrayed the membership.”
Well, that’s only to be expected from just another disingenuous liberal organization.
What started out as a valuable proponent for senior citizens and retirees, has now been fully bastardized into a tool for the democrat party.
“BusinessWeek magazine says that in the past questions have arisen about whether AARP’s commercial interests may conflict with those of its membership, and characterizes many of the funds and insurance policies that AARP markets as providing considerably less benefit than seniors could get on their own.”
Like I said, it’s all about the money, because the money buys them political influence.
Stephen Miller, for The Washington Post writes, “Here’s why I’ll never ever join the AARP.”
“Today I got another letter from AARP. The letters have been coming pretty much every week for 25 years [I’m sure we can all relate!]. But in the past two months they’ve changed. AARP used to ask me to join. Now the letters from the lobbying group for older Americans say that I have joined but I haven’t paid my bill.”
I can see many of our older senior citizens falling for this, which is exactly how it was intended, I’m sure.
DEMSCAM.
“The latest one has on the envelope in big red letters: ‘Immediate Attention Requested.’ It says, ‘Thank you for joining AARP.’ But two sentences later it adds: ‘If you’ll promptly return the enclosed invoice with your payment, we will reinstate your membership and you’ll once again be a member in good standing.’”
“So am I a new member or a lapsed member? Neither. I have never joined AARP. And never will.”
“AARP clearly hopes that one day I will come to my senses and realize that joining the group is a smart move. Why don’t I join? AARP has oodles of benefits, and it only costs 16 bucks for a year’s membership. You can save, the letter says, on prescriptions and health-care products through AARP’s convenient pharmacy service; you can save on hotels, motels, tours and cruises. You can save on groceries, restaurants, flowers, electronics, clothing, vision and hearing care, and more. AARP even has a Benefits Handbook.”
“But I don’t join because there’s one ‘benefit’ AARP offers that I dislike. ‘You benefit from AARP’s leadership in Washington as AARP fights to protect Social Security, Medicare and employment rights.’ Protect? AARP doesn’t protect Social Security and Medicare. It prevents any serious discussion of meaningfully reforming these programs, which are in great danger of becoming insolvent.”
AARP = DEMSCAM.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
According to dictionary.com, “chaos” means: “A state of utter confusion or disorder; a total lack of organization or order.”
Sooo, just because some republicans have differing ideas and beliefs from other republicans, and some republicans have deemed a change in leadership is necessary, and they have pushed for that change, within the parameters of established processes and congressional procedures, the republicans are deemed to have thrown Congress into a state of “chaos?”
You can read about the democrat approved narrative yourself, as propagandized by NPR (National Public Radio), in this instance, by Claudia Grisales, Deirdre Walsh, and Lexie Schapitl, when they write, “Fate of House GOP leadership throws Congress into chaos.”
Please note that NPR is a federally funded media outlet. That means WE are paying for the pleasure of having the government spread its propaganda back on us.
Ok, let’s continue with NPR’s take on the whole situation.
“The U.S. House of Representatives remains virtually frozen as Republican tumult fuels scrambled plans over who could take over leadership of the lower chamber.”
Some would say, myself included, that “the U.S. House of Representatives remaining virtually frozen” would be a step in the right direction.
“Republican members huddled in meeting after meeting on Wednesday with potential candidates for speaker talking to the different factions of the party.”
As if this was somehow a negative attribute of the republicans. Democrats have never “huddled” in any backroom meetings before! Especially regarding a change in their leadership! That would be democrat heresy!
Who believes it’s healthy for everyone associated with a given political party to walk and think and vote in lock-step with every other person, in this case every other representative, of a given political party?
I sincerely hope you’re not nodding or have your hand up.
I think many of us can recall groups of political factions who preferred to walk in lock-step (goosestep) with each other 100% of the time.
‘“There’s scenarios where this could be going on for weeks,’ Rep. Garret Graves, R-La., told reporters steps off the House floor amid the competing meetings.”
And if it does, so what?
“There is a tension between some lawmakers who want a quick election for speaker to move on and those who caution the conference needs to coalesce around someone who can bring all the factions together and avoid another embarrassing debacle on the House floor with multiple rounds of balloting.”
“Embarrassing debacle?”
Really?
Following congressional process and procedure to elect a new speaker of the house is an “embarrassing debacle?”
Maybe to the democrat “goose steppers,” but not the rest of us.
A “tension between some lawmakers” should be viewed as a natural, and a healthy thing, politically speaking. Who says all factions have to be brought together? Engaging in compromise used to be a huge part of getting things done in government. We have now arrived at a point where a simple majority just shoves what they want down everyone else’s throat.
Steve Scalise, a ranking republican representative from Louisiana, and one of the potentially new speakers, said, ‘“Our strength as a Conference comes from our unity, and we have seen when we unite as a Conference, we can deliver wins for the American people. Now we need to take those unified positions and work to extract conservative wins from the Democrat Senate and White House by leveraging upcoming deadlines. While we need to be realistic about what can be achieved, if we stay united, we can preserve leverage for the House to secure tangible wins in our impending policy fights.’”
What he is talking about is that the facts of the matter are, if the republicans want to accomplish anything, they have to vote in lock-step with each other in order to defeat the democrats, who have already mastered the lock-step routine.
It’s a sad state of affairs, but it is reality.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
In the last few days I’ve seen “President” Biden (please recall that we should always put the word “president” in quotes when referring to “President” Biden, since he didn’t actually win the election) show up on the United Auto Workers (UAW) picket line, in Detroit, touting his support for them, and working middle-class Americans, who “built this country,” in general.
Then I see “Scranton” Joe speaking at a fund raising event in Arizona, crying about how extreme MAGA republicans in Congress are about to shut down the government, and about how bad this would be for those same working middle-class Americans.
Sooo, it’s okay to shut down the American auto industry, and all of the businesses that support the auto industry, but it’s not okay to shut down (which really isn’t a shutdown anyway) the federal government, which working middle-class Americans get very little help from, and in fact, the federal government which is making life miserable for the average working middle-class American citizen (regarding the budget crushing prices of gas, groceries, utilities, rent, and mortgage rates), while it shovels OUR tax money to Ukraine and the support of millions of illegal immigrants.
Excuse me “Scranton” Joe, but you and your pathetic administration, along with your disingenuous and anti-American democrat party, can kiss all of our working middle-class American a$$es!
And you can throw in the disgusting establishment RINOs in Congress, and the derelict, negligent, and equally culpable mainstream media as well.
In reality, you and the rest of the democrats represent evil, death, crime, lies, and corruption.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
The former President, Donald J. Trump, sure doesn’t look worried.
He doesn’t look intimidated either.
I would say he looks pi$$ed off, and that these people should be careful what they wish for, because payback’s a b*tch.
Jonathan J. Cooper, for The Associated Press, reports, “One image, one face, one American moment: The Donald Trump mug shot.”
“A camera clicks. In a fraction of a second, the shutter opens and then closes, freezing forever the image in front of it.”
“When the camera shutter blinked inside an Atlanta jail on Thursday, it both created and documented a tiny inflection point in American life.”
A huge inflection point, in my estimation.
“Captured for posterity, there was a former president of the United States, for the first time in history, under arrest and captured in the sort of frame more commonly associated with drug dealers or drunken drivers. The trappings of power gone, for that split second.”
“Left behind: an enduring image that will appear in history books long after Donald Trump is gone.”
You can say that again.
‘“It will be forever part of the iconography of being alive in this time,’ said Marty Kaplan, a professor at the University of Southern California Annenberg School of Communications.”
Ooookay, agreed…, but did we really need a quote from some unknown professor from some unknown school to state the obvious here? Just sayin’.
“In a historic moment for American history, former President Donald Trump becomes the first president to have a booking photo released, and is also the first former president to be criminally charged.”
“In the photo, Trump confronts the camera in front of a bland gray backdrop, his eyes meeting the lens in an intense glare. He’s wearing a blue suit, white shirt and red tie, his shoulders squared, his head tilted slightly toward the camera. The sheriff’s logo has been digitally added above his right shoulder.”
“Some of the 18 others charged with him in Georgia smiled in their booking photos like they were posing for a yearbook. Not Trump. His defiance is palpable, as if he’s staring down a nemesis through the lens.”
Like I said, I would say he looks pi$$ed off, and that these people should be careful what they wish for, because payback’s a b*tch.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Imagine your grandpa is the president of the United States, and your grandma is the first lady of the United States, but they have chosen to pretend you don’t exist.
It’s a sad and shameful picture that no innocent child deserves.
I mean, we should allow Hunter to act like the piece of human garbage he is, but do Joe and Jill have to jump into that dumpster with him?
Jonathan Turley, for Fox News, a professor of public interest law at George Washington University and a practicing criminal defense attorney, reports that, “The Biden family refuses to acknowledge Hunter Biden’s 4-year-old daughter, and that Hunter Biden’s twisted attempts to keep his little girl from using his name are now in a new realm, and that the viciousness of the Biden family toward Hunter’s daughter, 4-year-old Navy Joan borders on monstrous.”
“Monstrous.”
That’s pretty harsh wording, coming from Jonathan Turley, who is normally pretty measured with his assessments.
You may be thinking, “Oh, here comes another gold digging woman, trying to make a quick buck.” But it was Hunter who initiated this latest courtroom battle, as he seeks to lower his child support payments.
Of course he does. What a guy!
“Hunter Biden will finally make it to Arkansas. The state itself is not a favorite Biden family destination but there is one thing that would ordinarily be an attraction: [Hunter] Biden’s daughter Navy Joan.”
Being a grandparent myself, it is hard to understand the type of people who would turn their backs on their granddaughter.
“In the Biden family, the 4-year-old girl remains ‘she who shall not be named’ literally. Not only has President Biden refused to refer to her as a grandchild or even include a Christmas stocking with the other children, her father Hunter is fighting to prevent her from using the Biden name. Indeed, the only reason that Hunter is coming to the same state that his daughter lives in is to seek to reduce his child support.”
Hard to imagine anyone would want to “use” the Biden name, but be that as it may…
“The viciousness of the Biden family in dealing with this little girl is only matched by that of the media. Reporters who profess to support women and denounce deadbeat dads have either ignored this story or belittled her mother Lunden Roberts.”
Hmmm, that’s odd…, well, not really.
“Roberts is widely dismissed as a ‘former stripper.’ That appears to be how she met Hunter, but it is often used to paint her in the same way that the media gleefully reported on former first lady Hillary Clinton denouncing the women who were involved with her husband as mere ‘bimbo eruptions.’”
Being just a little bit judgmental, are we?
I guess only transsexuals in drag are currently allowed to be “exotic” dancers.
“Yes, Roberts was an exotic dancer. She used that job to go to one of the most expensive colleges in the country, George Washington University, where I teach.”
“The reason the media ignores Navy Joan’s mother, Lunden Roberts, is that it wants to ignore what the Bidens have done.”
“When she became pregnant, she decided to have her child and raise her on her own. She has raised this child without a father and fought one of the most powerful families in the world.”
Many of us would call this commendable, and brave.
“When Navy Joan is older, there is every reason for her to be proud of the struggle that her mother went through in seeking a college education and raising her against all odds.”
“Despite Joe Biden long campaigning against deadbeat dads, his son had refused to acknowledge that he was the father of Navy Joan.”
Deadbeat dads are easy targets…, until your son, your family moneymaker becomes one.
“After a court forced him to confirm his paternity through DNA testing, he continued to fight paying support for his child. Hunter’s delay and evasion of filings and depositions led a court to repeatedly threaten sanctions.”
Typical Biden family behavior, actually.
Didn’t this court realize who they were dealing with, and that normal laws don’t apply to the Bidens?
C’mon, man!
“However, the effort to bar this child from using the Biden name has moved this scandal from the realm of hypocrisy to monstrosity.”
“It is hard to imagine the pain that this child will experience upon learning of how the Bidens erased any reference to her and fought even her ability to claim to be a member of their family. (Even the Bidens’ dogs and cats got stockings at Christmas, but not their granddaughter Navy Joan, whom they have never asked to even see, let alone support.)”
“If one were to combine all of Hunter’s influence peddling, drug abuse, orgies and prostitution controversies, they would not hold a candle to the utter depravity shown toward this little girl.”
You mean the “alleged” influence peddling, drug abuse, orgies and prostitution controversies, right?
All of these infractions seem to be pretty common knowledge now, however.
“Despite assembling a new Legion of Doom of high-priced lawyers and advisers, Hunter is claiming that he simply cannot meet demands for child support.”
“Given his opposition to such support for years and reported millions in foreign dealings, it would seem transparently absurd.”
“It is even more difficult to accept this excuse as he jets between his luxurious mansion in Malibu to digs at the White House. The public reportedly pays more for his security in his mansion than he does for monthly support for his daughter.”
Aren’t we nice?
“There is, however, a crushing karmic aspect to Hunter being forced to appear in Arkansas. His efforts to limit his child support may have backfired and could prove costly.”
In the end, I seriously doubt it.
“Hunter has struggled to conceal his finances, including money that he received from alleged influence peddling. Now the court is considering the laptop as possible evidence in millions of past assets. While a U.S. Attorney in Delaware is exploring criminal charges and House committees are looking into the influence peddling, his fight against this toddler could force a decision on the authenticity of the laptop.”
Is that what you call slow-walking and looking the other way…, “exploring?”
“In the last hearing, Hunter’s counsel tried again to maintain deniability.”
“Here is the exchange after Judge Meyer referenced Garrett Ziegle as a potential expert witness on the contents of the laptop:”
“Langdon: ‘There has never been, to my knowledge, an acknowledgment that this so-called laptop, he continuously calls it Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop …’”
“Meyer: ‘Well, let’s clear that issue up right now. Is it your client’s laptop or not?’”
“Langdon: ‘Your honor, I’m not involved in all of that stuff. It’s not my client’s laptop as far as I know.’”
“Meyer: ‘Is it your client’s position, you’re representing to this court, that it is not his laptop?’”
“Langdon: ‘Your honor, I am not in a position to even begin to answer that question.’”
Deny, deny, deny. Lie, lie, lie…, straight out of the old democrat playbook.
“It is bizarre to continue this obfuscation years after the release of the laptop. Hunter is facing the use of the laptop as evidence in this case as well as the federal prosecution and House investigations. Yet, his counsel is still claiming ignorance as to whether it is authentic.”
“It is the continuation of a long campaign of disinformation. Before the 2020 election, the media repeated the false claim that the Hunter Biden laptop was likely ‘Russian disinformation.’”
“Despite the denial of American intelligence and self-verifying emails on the laptop, the media accepted without question [and promoted] the dubious claims of former intelligence figures organized by longtime Democratic operatives.”
“It worked beautifully.”
“It was not until two years later that NPR, the New York Times and other legacy media outlets got around to telling the public the truth.”
Well, kinda.
“Hunter has long refused to acknowledge ownership of the laptop. When asked years ago by CBS News, about its authenticity, he shrugged and said, ‘There could be a laptop out there that was stolen from me. It could be that I was hacked. It could be that it was Russian intelligence.’”
Yeah, “Maybe it’s something really cool that we don’t even know about. You know?”
“I thought we were in the trust tree, were we not?”
“In some ways, it is a continuation of Hunter’s long denial of his child’s paternity. Yet, the DNA did not lie.”
“Hunter could now be forced to accept this laptop as his own. That could prove far more costly than the child support that he is seeking to avoid in Arkansas.”
Like I said before, I doubt it. And if it does, Navy Joan will be in college, and Creepy Joe will just be a bad memory by that time.
“None of this, of course, will get Navy Joan a stocking on next year’s Biden family fireplace. According to Joe Biden, she is not one of his grandchildren despite being fathered by his own son.”
“Nor will this make Hunter Biden a better person. However, if she succeeds in using the Biden family name, she will certainly prove the best of the lot.”
You can say that again.
And by far!
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Mr. Erickson Rules! 