“President Trump is NOT a racist.” – Dr. Alveda King, niece of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

In light of all of the garbage liberal propaganda flying around out there, characterizing President Trump as a racist and even as a white supremacist, Dr. Alveda King has come to the defense President Trump.

Jason Lemon, for NEWSWEEK, reported that “Dr. Alveda King, the niece of iconic Civil Rights activist Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., told Fox News on Tuesday that claims by Democrats, pundits and activists that President Donald Trump is a racist are inaccurate.”

alveda 8

alveda 9

alveda 6

“During a Tuesday morning segment of Fox & Friends, King appeared for an interview with the morning show’s co-host Steve Doocy to discuss a meeting she and other African American pastors had with Trump at the White House and to comment on The President’s recent attacks on Democrat Representative Elijah Cummings and his city, Baltimore. After Doocy played a clip of politicians and analysts criticizing The President and arguing that he is racist, [Dr.] King disagreed strongly.”

‘“All of that news is absolutely fake,’ [Dr. Alveda] King, who formerly served as a representative in Georgia’s State House, insisted.  She told Doocy that The President told her and the others in their meeting this week that ‘he cares about all Americans.’”

alveda 5

What does Dr. King have to gain by defending The President?

Why would she say these things if she didn’t believe they were true?

‘“You know, we all believe the same. That’s something the president has said, one race, one human race,’ Dr. King said. ‘He’s not a racist, absolutely is not,’ she continued, ‘and the programs that he has moved forward, the higher job market is helping African Americans. The criminal justice reform, helping African Americans.’”

alveda 4

“Trump on Saturday lashed out at Cummings, who represents Maryland’s 7th District which includes more than half of Baltimore, arguing that the representative’s city is a place where ‘No human being would want to live.’”

‘“Cumming’s district is a disgusting, rat and rodent infested mess. If he spent more time in Baltimore, maybe he could help clean up this very dangerous & filthy place,’ The President wrote.”

“Many Democratic lawmakers and commentators quickly defended Cummings and Baltimore, arguing that the president’s remarks were yet another racist attack on a black American leader and an area with a largely minority population. But King disagreed with that assessment, arguing that the president was pointing to real problems.”

Here we go again.

alveda 7

What about all of the people suffering and living in squalor in Baltimore?  Who quickly defends them?

Anytime you dare to criticize and African American leader and/or politician you’re a racist.

Are these people that weak and insecure that they can’t defend their performance and their policies before playing “the race card?”

alveda 2

alveda 10

Is anything they do or say beyond reproach?

So are these “Democratic lawmakers and commentators” who “quickly defended [Congressman] Cummings” saying that Cumming’s district isn’t “a disgusting, rat and rodent infested mess?”  Are they saying his district isn’t a “dangerous and filthy place?”

No…, of course not.  There is no defense for Congressman Cummings, so they just whip out their “race cards” to absolve him of all responsibility and accountability.

‘“You look at his [Cummings’] community and you see individuals suffering, you see the community suffering and families suffering,’ she said.”

“The conservative Coalition of African American Pastors, which King is a part of, met with Trump on Monday and defended the president against claims that he’s a racist. Although critics suggested the meeting was just cover for the president, King told Doocy that was not the case and that the meeting had been planned before his criticism of Cummings.”

alveda 1

“Bill Owens, the president of the coalition, praised Trump after the meeting, pointing to ‘the things he’s done for the black community, positive things for the black community.’”

The truth is, these democrat politicians really aren’t worried about helping anyone but themselves…, period.

alveda 3

alveda 11

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

CNN’s ratings have fallen, and they can’t get up!

Yes…, CNN’s ratings are falling like a rock, and they have been for quite a while now.

A once proud and even iconic new channel, which had been trumpeted by the unmistakable voice of James Earl Jones, is in deep trouble.

Their ratings are collapsing.

People began seriously questioning the credibility of the biased, fake news media, led by CNN, during the Obama years, and then especially during President Trump’s campaign run, the beginning of his presidency, and right on up to today.

cnn 14

Conservatives don’t watch the channel anymore because their philosophy is constantly under attack on this network, and the “fake news” and liberal propaganda was just too much to bear.  Many liberals have become disenchanted with CNN as well due to the growing lack of credibility and an increase of misinformation, especially where the Mueller Report and Russian Collusion were involved.

CNN has taken the acceptable amount of liberal bias to a whole new level.

Beyond the realm of bias into the world of unabashed propaganda.

cnn 8

cnn 7

cnn 3

cnn 2

According to Brian Flood of Fox News, “News network CNN is planning to reduce its headcount, leaving many staffers worried for their jobs. As the network’s ratings continue to sag, over 100 CNN employees have accepted voluntary buyouts…”

“CNN’s audience shriveled in the second quarter of 2019, averaging typically less than half of Fox News Channel’s average. But CNN struggled even more during the prime time hours, finishing as the fifteenth most-watched network on basic cable behind networks such as TLC, Investigation Discovery and the Hallmark Channel.”

The Hallmark Channel?

At this point, more people are tuning in to watch “SpongeBob Squarepants” than Anderson Cooper, Chris Cuomo or Don Lemon.

cnn 12

“CNN is suffering a credibility crisis… with no apparent plan in place to fix things anytime soon, according to media watchdogs and insiders.”

Of course not!

Don’t you get it?!

They’re not going to try and “fix” anything because they don’t think anything is broken!

They’re pumping out the liberal propaganda and fake news just like they intend to.

In their eyes we’re the ones who are broken, not them!

cnn 1

cnn 6

cnn 4

cnn 5

cnn 13

Don’t worry about CNN.  They’ll continue to be subsidized by their big liberal corporate friends, like Nike, Starbucks, Apple, Google, Time Warner, Under Armor and a hundred others.

“CNN did not immediately respond when asked for comment.”

Does this surprise anybody?

CNN’s programming strategy is anti-Trump all the time.

They have abandoned ANY semblance of fairness or balance.

“Cable news viewership has declined in general as more and more consumers cut the cord in favor of streaming services, but CNN’s losses are overwhelming. The network lost 18 percent of its audience compared to the second quarter of last year. CNN also dropped a whopping 38 percent of prime time viewers among the key demo [demographic].”

I’m sure MSNBC will be following CNN’s lead in the near future.

Only one network at a time can be flushed down the toilet!  They’re all in there swirling around the bowl right now, and CNN is closest to the drain!

WINNING!

cnn 10

cnn 11

cnn 9

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

 

People spitting on others, heckling, harassing, punching, and assaulting others in public because of their beliefs.  Is this the type of company you want to keep?

Are these the type of people you want to be associated with?

If you’re a liberal democrat these days, the answer is “yes.”

activists 7

In fact, many liberal democrat politicians and leaders are actually encouraging this type of behavior, a la Congresswoman Maxine “low IQ” Waters.

Over the course of the last couple of years, the behavior of liberal democrat activists has become disgusting and shameful.

These liberal “neo-fascists” see no problem with pushing our democracy and freedoms over the edge.

activists 2

They utilize Nazi type tactics while calling their adversaries Nazis.

activists 3

activists 18

They display fascist type behavior while calling their opponents fascists.

activists 1

We recently had an incident where President Trump’s son, Eric, was spit on, by a waitress at a restaurant he patronizing!  His son!

Can you imagine that ever happening to presidential daughters, Chelsea Clinton, or Malia or Sasha Obama?

Of course not.

Conservatives maintain a level of decency, and they know where to draw the line when it comes political activism.

activists 4

Liberal democrats have stampeded over that line of decency like a horde of shameless paparazzi chasing down some recent, pathetic, Hollywood “idol.”

Like a bunch of mindless zombies, just looking to take a bite out of anyone they can get their disgusting hands on.

Like an annoying bunch of obnoxious school-aged bullies (You can picture them, can’t you?), mercilessly picking on some other kids just because they’re decent kids.

Well…, you get the picture.

We’ve had the spitting incident I mentioned above.

We’ve seen conservative students on college campuses being punched and attacked, and their property destroyed or stolen because of their messaging.

activists 9

activists 13

activists 11

We’ve seen activist liberals publicly burn and vandalize campus property in an effort to impede the engagements of conservative speakers and intimidate those that wanted to hear them.

activists 14

activists 9

activists 10

We’ve seen Sarah Huckabee Sanders, and her family, kicked out of a restaurant just because she was the President’s spokesperson.

activists 15

We’ve seen the former head of DHS, Kirstjen Nielson and her family, and Senator Mitch McConnell and his wife, heckled and harassed while having dinner at a restaurant, to the point where they were forced to leave.

We’ve seen the former Florida Attorney General, Pam Bondi and a friend be harassed when trying to go see a movie, to the point that they required police escorts to safely leave a theater.

We’ve seen Trump supporting senior citizens assaulted in the streets.

And there are many other examples of this type of behavior.

Marc Caputo and Daniel Lippman of Politico Magazine wrote, “… there’s a bipartisan sense that this election season marks another inflection point in the collapse of civil political discourse.”

Well put.

activists 19

‘“If you see anybody from that Cabinet — in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station — you get out and you create a crowd.  And you push back on them.  And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,’ implored California Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters at a Saturday rally, prompting an immediate conservative backlash on social media.”

Ahhh…, the ever confused, “low IQ” congresswoman, Maxine Waters.

activists 21

activists 22

‘“When you’re violent and cursing and screaming and blocking me from walking into a movie, there’s something wrong,” [Pam Bondi] said.”

“Presidential historian Michael Beschloss lamented that the flare-ups are ‘a new disheartening sign of a country that is becoming more divided by the hour… It’s a polarized country.”

Republicans contend the confrontational politics will inspire a backlash among a silent majority that is watching the left grow unhinged.

“There’s not more energy on the left. There’s more hatred,” said [Jackie] Toledo, the Tampa Republican who said her kids were bothered in a coffee shop.  “I signed up for this.  But my kids?  I thought kids were off limits.  Family is off limits.  And it backfires when you attack families.”

Even some Democrats are a little concerned about the effectiveness of aggressive protesting.

Ya…, “some” meaning like two or three, and “a little concerned” means they are concerned very, very, very little.

Former Pennsylvania Democrat Congressman Paul Kanjorski said, “I don’t know why they picked on the attorney general from Florida.  I don’t like her or her political positions, but she has a right to travel and be around without being harassed.”  We’re limiting real conversation and discussion in this country, and it’s a problem.”

Mr. Kanjorski sounds like a fair minded and reasonable person.  That’s probably why he’s a “former” congressman.  The democrats have no desire to be associated with being “fair minded” or “reasonable” anymore.

I have a feeling these fascist tactics by the democrats will get worse before they get better.

But they will get better…, once these sad little fascists start receiving some push-back…, and bloody nose of their own from time to time.

WINNING!

activists 6

activists 5

activists 16

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Welcome to “The Peoples Racism Court!” Better known as the TV show, “The View.”

The hosts of “The View” are apparently the official arbiters of who is and who is not a racist in this country.

Sam Dorman of Fox News reported that, ‘“The View’ hosts defend Joe Biden from Dem attacks, say there’s a ‘real racist in the White House.’”

‘“The View’ hosts on Thursday pushed back on race-based criticisms of former Vice President Joe Biden, suggesting that by calling him a ‘racist,’ people were trivializing real racism in the White House.”

‘“Joe Biden is not a racist, and I would never call him a racist especially when I believe we have a true racist sitting in the White House,’ host Sunny Hostin said, receiving support from co-hosts Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar.”

race 10

So you would “NEVER” call Biden a racist…, huh, Sunny…, huh, Whoopi…, huh, Joy?

But we have a “true racist” in The White House though?

racist

And we all know why this is the case per you and your friends…, BECAUSE JOE BIDEN IS A DEMOCRAT, A LIBERAL, AND A CARD CARRYING, LIFETIME, MEMBER OF ‘THE SWAMP!”

Joe Biden could run around Washington D.C. calling every black person he saw the “N word,” and he would get a free racism pass.

reps 10

And what is it exactly that President Trump said or did that earned him the title of a “true racist?”

Hmmm?

Go ahead…, talk amongst yourselves…, I’ll wait.

Still waiting…

Still waiting…

Oh, well…, get back to me when you actually come up with something…, I won’t hold my breath!

race 7

“Goldberg, who grew up during the civil rights era, implied it was ridiculous to call Biden a racist and defended him for working with segregationists as a senator. ‘There are real racists out there,’ she exclaimed.”

You’re such a phony, and a hypocrite, Whoopi.

It’s just as “ridiculous” to call President Trump a racist, and you know it.

“She went on to tell Biden’s competitors to beat him in debates but not to call him a racist. ‘You can’t call the dude a racist. He sat for eight years with a black guy,’ she said, referring to former President Barack Obama.”

And she doesn’t even realize how much of a racist she sounds like.

race 3

race 2

race 1

race 6

race 5

race 8

Only a racist constantly sees things through the eyes of a racial perspective…, black or white.

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

If there wasn’t any negative news about President Trump there’d be no news at all!

The “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” is just relentless when it comes bashing our president.

In an editorial on the “Investor’s Business Daily” website, they claim, “Media Trump Hatred Shows In 92% Negative Coverage of His Presidency: Study”

trump neg 7

They continue by saying, “Anti-Trump Media: To say that the big networks haven’t exactly had a love affair with Donald Trump, as they plainly did with President Obama, is an understatement. A new survey shows that not only is coverage of Trump overwhelmingly negative, but the president’s biggest accomplishment — the roaring economy — gets almost no attention.”

No…, not “almost no attention,” NO attention!

trump neg 9

“What they found was, as Trump himself might say, sad: ‘Over the summer, the broadcast networks have continued to pound Donald Trump and his team with the most hostile coverage of a president in TV news history — 92% negative, vs. just 8% positive.’”

I would argue that even these numbers are a misnomer.  I would say news coverage is 92% negative, 7% is just “non-negative” and 1% or less are actually positive.

trump neg 2

“Moreover, the very focus of what the media cover is highly selective. Some two-thirds of the Trump coverage came from five topics, including the Russia investigation, immigration, the Brett Kavanaugh nomination, North Korea, and U.S.-Russia relations.

Let’s see, what’s missing from that list? Oh yes, the one thing that’s overwhelmingly positive for President Trump: the economy.”

In other words…, propaganda by omission.

“If we don’t report it, it didn’t happen, or it’s not important.”

Even when they report something of a positive nature, it always has to come with a caveat.

For example, here we have typical negative Trump headline by Joe Williams for FOX Business:

“US adds 75,000 jobs in May, far less than expected.”

Can we not just be glad that we added 75,000 jobs in May?

And what about the unemployment rate in the country that remains at 3.6 percent…, the lowest since 1969?  I haven’t heard much about that.

Propaganda by omission and the “but” news.

President Trump cut taxes for everyone, but…

President Trump has brought manufacturing jobs back to America, but…

President Trump is making NATO allies finally pay their fair share, but…

President Trump is making other countries deal fairly with us regarding trade, but…

But, but, but.

trump neg 6

In addition to the “but” news, we also see bizarre, negative, fake news articles that just leaves you scratching your head.

For example:

“Washington Post columnist links Trump’s UK fashion choices to life missteps.”

By Bradford Betz for Fox News.

“If you can’t properly wear a tux, you’re going to have a lot of problems in life, according to Washington Post fashion critic Robin Givhan.”

trump neg 1

“Her 965-word, June 5 article dresses down President Trump, the First Lady– and to a lesser extent– his family – for what she called poor fashion sensibilities during an appearance the Buckingham Palace Banquet this week.”

“Givhan goes on to equate fashion with diplomacy. With this equation, Givhan’s concludes, we can gain subtle insights into the president’s mind.’

What?

The “fashion critic” feels the need to join in the Trump bashing as well?

It also appears that “the fashion critic,” an esteemed and necessary position in its own right, is also a qualified psychoanalyst!

Then we have another article published by “Yahoo Style UK,” titled:

“Disrespectful Melania Trump criticized for leaving sunglasses on during D-Day ceremony.”

Excuse me?

How is this this being “disrespectful?”

trump neg1306-donald-trump-dday.w700.h700

If anything, Yahoo is being disrespectful of the First Lady.

Then we have an article for the “Style” section of “The Daily Beast,” by   Alaina Demopoulos and Tim Teeman titled:

“Is That a Hat or UFO? Melania and Ivanka Trump Bid a Fashionably Fierce Farewell to U.K.”

Can you ever imagine these people taking pot shots at Michelle Obama’s wardrobe?

Of course not.

The article went on and on about all of the poor Trump fashion choices in their opinion, and finished off by saying, “The queen, meanwhile, looked her usual, utterly on-point distinctive self, in a wonderful hot pink coat dress and hat (with non-life-threatening brim), while imminently doomed British Prime Minister Theresa May donned a curious spearmint coat, with turned in collars, over white dress and a hat that was a complementary satellite dish shape to Melania’s UFO.”

trump neg 3

So the bottom line is…, all of the fashion choices made by royals, socialists and liberals are exquisite, while those made by conservatives are horrendous.

Lastly, we have a typical “fake news,” “liberal propaganda” article by   Heather Timmons, titled, “Joe Biden beats Donald Trump in Texas presidential poll.”

Does anyone really believe that Joe Biden would beat Donald Trump in Texas?

Of course not.

They don’t tell us that the poll question that was asked was, “Who is the creepiest presidential candidate?”

In this instance, Joe Biden wins hands down!

trump neg 4

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

The disingenuous “biased, liberal, fake news media” tries to paint President Trump as a liar…, again, regarding Mexico and the border wall. 

According to Ying Ma of Fox News, “Trump-haters are again foaming at the mouth over comments made by The President regarding the border wall he has promised to build.  Once again, they are wrong about their criticism of the president.”

“President Trump noted last week that his campaign promise to build a wall and have Mexico pay for it ‘obviously’ did not mean getting a check from the Mexican government directly.  Rather, he said, Mexico will be paying for the wall indirectly, ‘many, many times over’ via the trade agreement his administration recently renegotiated with Canada and Mexico to replace NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement).”

“The anti-Trump media wasted no time accusing the president of lying. CNN, featuring all-out indignation from its anchors, promptly replayed video footage from Trump campaign rallies showing Trump and his raucous crowds chanting that Mexico will pay for the wall.”

“The Washington Post has chimed in as well and declared in a headline: ‘Trump falsely asserts he never promised Mexico would directly pay for the border wall.’”

“Meanwhile, Politifact screamed out its own verdict: ‘Trump says he didn’t say Mexico would write US a check for border wall.  But he did.’”

Before our friends in the “biased, liberal. Fake news media” go getting too excited, let’s remember that it was only a couple weeks ago that the congress finally authorized any wall spending, and only $1.375 billion at that, so there hasn’t even been an opportunity for Mexico to kick in for anything until just recently.

Nevertheless, it is extremely disingenuous for his critics to huff and puff over what they perceive as a lie.

Do you recall such an uproar after former President Obama declared, “If you like your doctor you can keep doctor.  If you like your plan you can keep your plan.”  Or how about, “Every family will save $2,500 on this plan on average.”  Or how about, “The Affordable Care Act” (ObamaCare) won’t add one dime to the federal deficit.”

I sure don’t, and these were actual premeditated lies…, just to name a few!

It’s just another example to the “biased, liberal, fake news media” and their propaganda by omission.

“One could disagree with the substance [of President Trump’s claims], but those pretending to be honest and objective observers of President Trump should at least try to understand why ‘build the wall’ … became a rallying cry during the last presidential campaign.”

“The chant reflected voters’ frustration that Mexico was engaging in unfair practices, whether in trade or immigration, while politicians in Washington on both the left and the right did nothing about it”

“Candidate Trump promised to change this.  If Trump-haters paid attention to this core idea, they might understand why Trump supporters care far more about whether the president builds the wall and strengthen border security than they care about whether Mexico pays for the wall directly or indirectly.”

BUILD THAT WALL!  BUILD THAT WALL!  BUILD THAT WALL!

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please scroll down to the very bottom of this page and click the “Follow” button.  That’ll keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

build the wall

For all of those liberals living in denial…, well here you go, straight from the horse’s…, uh, I mean the editor’s mouth!

Jill Abramson, a veteran journalist in her own right, and the former executive editor at The New York Times newspaper from 2011 to 2014, says “The Times” has a financial incentive to bash the president and that the imbalance is helping to erode its credibility.  She added that, the paper’s “news” pages have become “unmistakably anti-Trump.”

Please go on Ms. Abramson, but tell us something we don’t already know.

Being the executive editor for four years during President Obama’s tenure was obviously a pretty boring time at “The Times.”  The “biased, liberal, fake news media” wasn’t interested in any hard hitting investigative “journalism” concerning President Obama or his administration.  There were no daily attacks of President Obama, the first lady, or his family. There was only properly spun propaganda or propaganda by omission.

I’m sure “The Times,” version 2017-2018, looks and sounds quite different today compared to the paper she left four years ago.

I do wonder, however, what she is referring to when she says “The Times has a financial incentive to bash the president….” What “financial incentive” exactly do they receive for bashing the president, and from whom?

This definitely does not sound like something a “fair and balanced” news source would practice.  Does it?  Fair minded people of course would say “no,” but how do my liberal friends respond to this?  I’m just wondering, and I hope they give me some feedback.

I can’t see any possible justification for this behavior unless you’re okay with a major media outlet being a propaganda tool for any ideology or political party, while claiming to be objective.

According to Howard Kurtz, of Fox News, for Media Buzz, “In a soon-to-be published book, ‘Merchants of Truth,’ that casts a skeptical eye on the news business, Abramson defends the Times in some ways but offers some harsh words for her successor, Dean Baquet.  And Abramson, who was the paper’s only female executive editor until her firing, invoked Steve Bannon’s slam that in the Trump era the mainstream media have become the “opposition party.”

‘“Though Baquet said publicly he didn’t want the Times to be the opposition party, his news pages were unmistakably anti-Trump,’ Abramson writes, adding that she believes the same is true of the Washington Post. ‘Some headlines contained raw opinion, as did some of the stories that were labeled as news analysis.’”

“Abramson describes a generational split at the Times, with younger staffers, many of them in digital jobs, favoring an unrestrained assault on the presidency. ‘The more “woke” staff thought that urgent times called for urgent measures; the dangers of Trump’s presidency obviated the old standards,’ she writes.”

President Trump routinely claims that he “is keeping the failing New York Times in business.”  Some would say this is an exaggeration, but the former editor acknowledges a “Trump bump” that saw digital subscriptions during his first six months in office jump by 600,000, to more than 2 million.

I would call that quite significant!

‘“Given its mostly liberal audience, there was an implicit financial reward for the Times in running lots of Trump stories, almost all of them negative…,’ Abramson added.”

When her boss, Arthur Sulzberger Jr. decided to let her go, he called her in, fired her, and handed her a press release announcing her resignation.

Abramson says she replied, “Arthur, I’ve devoted my entire career to telling the truth, and I won’t agree to this press release.  I’m going to say I’ve been fired.”

Just one more attempt at “fake news” I guess!

Of course the rest of the “biased, liberal, fake news media” claim that a result of losing her job she is now being vindictive and making false claims against The New York Times.

It’s funny, but I never hear “the biased, liberal, fake news media” claiming that former Trump appointees or employees are acting in a vindictive manner or making false claims against him.

Just sayin’.

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please scroll down to the bottom of the page and click the “Follow” button.  That’ll keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

nytimes-fake_news-all_the_news

 

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑