Wooo! Was I watching “WrestleMania,” WWE Wednesday Night “SmackDown,” or the democrat debate?!

adebate 1

adebate 5a

adebate 6

Like WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment) superstar “Road Dogg” Jesse James says, “Oh, you didn’t know? You’re a$$ better call somebodyyyyy!”

And the democrats who should’ve “called somebody” were Michael Bloomberg and Amy Klobuchar.

adebate 10

Bloomberg should have called 911 and Klobuchar should have taken a page from “Who wants to be a Millionaire” and “asked the audience” or “phoned a friend!”

adebate 8

According to Mary Anne Marsh [Mary Anne Marsh is a Democrat political analyst and a principal at Dewey Square Group in Boston where she provides strategic counsel for Fortune 100 companies, non-profits and political campaigns.] for Fox News, “In fierce Democratic presidential debate, 1 winner and 5 losers.”

Ms. Marsh’s bio indicates that she is an extremely biased liberal, and I would argue the democrats had no winners in this debate.  The only real winner here was President Trump!

adebate 7

I felt her overall take on the debate, however, was pretty accurate.

“Multibillionaire Michael Bloomberg landed in Las Vegas like a highly anticipated show on the Strip. But when he took to the stage with five competitors for the Democratic presidential nomination Wednesday night, their debate immediately became an Ultimate Fighting Championship [UFC] match.”

“Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., landed the most blows and won the night [This is debatable. I would say she wasn’t really attacked by anyone because none of them feel she is someone to worry about anymore!]. Warren would not be ignored or denied [This means the debate moderators failed to stop her from being a blabber mouth and time hog.] Warren flattened Bloomberg out of the gate using his own words against the former New York City mayor and he never recovered. As a result, voters got to see the real Warren, who was the front-runner last fall. And they saw the real Bloomberg, not the filtered one seen on paid TV ads and in social media.”

Have you realized yet that Ms. Marsh is an Elizabeth Warren fan?

“Warren’s strong performance helped her at a time when she needs it most and hurt Bloomberg so badly that he may not recover.”

This I agree with.  The whole world saw that Michael “The Emperor” Bloomberg has no clothes!  He was unmasked as a fraud, a hack, and not ready for prime time.

In Marsh’s opinion, “There was one winner [Warren] and five losers at the end of the debate – Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont; former Vice President Joe Biden; Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota; former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg; and Bloomberg, who turned out to be the biggest loser of all.”

“With Bloomberg standing to her right Warren landed a left to the jaw with a shattering exchange using his own words about women against him. She then used his nondisclosure agreements, the stop-and-frisk tactic employed by police primarily against minorities when he was mayor, and his vast fortune estimated at more than $60 billion against him too.”

“Bloomberg’s performance was a disaster. He was not the Bloomberg of his ads in this debate – and that’s now a big problem for him.”

“Warren exposed the real Michael Bloomberg and it was not a pretty picture.”

“It was Warren’s relentless challenge to Bloomberg on a host of issues – including his treatment of women who worked for him and his refusal to release them from nondisclosure agreements – as well as his treatment of people of color with his stop-and-frisk policy.”

“Bloomberg’s attempts to apologize and explain only made the situation worse. His apology came off as more about convenience than sincerity – and that will register with voters too.”

“Finally, Bloomberg also sounded a lot like President Trump when asked about releasing his tax returns, raising issues about his lack of transparency.”

“Sanders, the self-described democratic socialist who represents Vermont was repeatedly questioned about his lack of transparency regarding his medical records, his recent heart attack and the cost of his “Medicare-for-all” plan.”

Mayor Pete “Buttigieg is the leader in delegates at this early stage from his strong finish in Iowa and New Hampshire. He used the debate to land a few blows on Sanders, with whom he’s locked in a delegate fight.”

“The former mayor also hit Klobuchar, who he is competing with for moderate voters…,” and they “… had a number of exchanges in their fight for moderate voters.”

I particularly liked when Mayor Pete referred to Klobuchar’s previous inability to name the president of Mexico, even though she is on trade and immigration committees in the Senate.

Her response was, “Are you mocking me?” and “Are you calling me dumb?” Obviously attempting put Mayor Pete on the defensive while trying to gain some sympathy for herself.

I would say, “If the shoe fits, wear it, Amy!”

Bam!

adebate 2

Former Vice-President “Biden did nothing to help himself. He looked like a tourist in Las Vegas rather than someone who should own the stage.”

Ha!

“Biden did little if anything to reassure voters he’s the best one to take on Trump or stem his slide in the polls. And that’s more bad news for Biden in this race.”

Bloomberg did manage to land a blow on Bernie, however, when he said, “Sanders, the best known socialist over here, happens to be a millionaire with three houses.”

Boom!

adebate 3

The truth hurts, right, Bernie?

The truth hurts in general for all of these democrat candidates.

And that’s the truth!

Wham!

adebate 4

I’m actually looking forward to the next democrat debate.

I’m sure Mini-Mike Bloomberg can’t say the same!

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

More “Swampy” Nursery Rhymes!

The Second Edition of MrEricksonRules’ “Swampy” Nursery Rhymes!

arhymes 8

I know you’ve all been waiting patiently for this.

Well, here it is!

This much anticipated second edition of my “Swampy” nursery rhymes pays tribute to the sad democrat presidential candidates still in the race.

arhymes 2

A farewell to Elizabeth Warren, aka “Pocahontas,” aka “the bag lady,” ala “There was an old woman who lived in a shoe.”

 

There was an old bag lady who thought she was cool,

She had so many supporters she started to drool;

Thoughts of becoming the president they grew in her head,

But her lying and stupidness quickly put that to bed.

 

arhymes 3

A Rhyme for “Crazy” Bernie, read to “It’s raining; it’s pouring.”

 

Bernie’s whining and roaring.

The OLD man is boring.

He may be the frontrunner after primary two,

But be prepared, Bernie, cuz they’re gonna screw you!

 

arhymes 5

A Tribute to another OLD friend, “Sleepy” Joe Biden, sung to “Hush, little baby don’t say a word.”

 

Hush, Creepy Joe-oe don’t Say a Word,

Cuz every time I hear you you sound like a turd.

 

And if your statements don’t make sense,

They’ll be ignored or blamed on Pence.

 

And if Barack won’t endorse your race,

Then that’s a real slap in your face.

 

And if you can’t actually win a state,

Then dropping out may be your fate.

 

And if your campaign just isn’t meant to be,

It’s not like a big surprise to me.

 

Barack said, “You don’t have to do this, Joe,”

You should have listened and just stayed home.

 

arhymes 1

Another ode to “Sleepy” Joe, sung to “Oh where, oh where has my little dog gone.”

 

Oh where, oh where has Sleepy Joe gone?

Oh where, oh where can he be?

With two 5th place finishes to start the race,

Oh where, oh where can he be?

 

Oh where, oh where has Sleepy Joe gone?

Oh where, oh where can he be?

He still thinks that he’s leading the pack, but,

Oh where, oh where can he be?

 

arhymes 4

My rendition of “Lazy Mary will you get up?” for Amy Klobuchar.

 

Lamey Amy, won’t you give up,

Won’t you give up, won’t you give up?

Lamey Amy, won’t you give up,

So early in the run-ning?

 

No, dear socialists, I won’t give up,

I won’t give up, I won’t give up.

No, dear socialists I won’t give up,

So early in the run-ning.

 

arhymes 7

And we can’t forget Mayor Pete!  Read to “Little Bo Peep.”

 

Ex-Mayor Pete has lost the blacks

And doesn’t know where to find them.

If he leaves them alone

They’ll never come home

And he won’t any more elections.

 

Ex-Mayor Pete, he searched for the blacks

But didn’t quite know how to find them.

He looked everywhere

From here and to there

But still couldn’t get them to vote for him.

 

Ex-Mayor Pete began to weep

And lay down to rest for a while

He fell fast asleep

While counting is black sheep

Then dreamt they came home with a smile.

 

I hope you enjoyed this second edition of MrEricksonRules’ “Swampy” Nursey Rhymes!

Stay tuned for my third edition in the near future.  I’m working on more good ones already!

WINNING!

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

“Crazy” Bernie still wants to be president!

Bernie Sanders (I), Independent Senator from the state of Vermont is running for president, again.

abernie 1

Independent?

Independent exactly how?

How crazy is “Crazy” Bernie?

Well, it is actually seems to be more of a confusion…, but “crazy” will work.

abernie 2

Let’s begin with Bernie’s confusion about what he is to start things off.

I mean…, if you’re confused about who or what you are, where do you go from there?

Bernie self-identifies as an “independent,” even though he votes along with the democrats nearly 100% of the time.

If he’s an “independent,” on what issues has he sided with the Republicans?

Can anyone even name one issue where he bucked the democrats in favor of the Republicans?

And…, if Bernie truly is an “independent,” why is he participating in the Democrat presidential primaries…, again?

He refers to himself as a democratic socialist.

Isn’t that being a bit redundant these days?

Just sayin’.

abernie 6

Then there’s Bernie’s rantings about income inequality and how millionaires need to be made to pay more than their fair share.

That was until someone pointed out to Bernie that he was a millionaire.

Now Bernie rants about billionaires instead.

abernie 8

Here’s an example of how bright Bernie is.

In 2016, it is common knowledge now that Bernie was railroaded by the DNC so the establishment democrats’ darling, Hillary, could win the democrat party nomination.

So what does Bernie decide to do?

He decides to run with the democrats…, again…, so he can get screwed all over…, again!

Can anyone say, “Thank you sir, may I have another?!

I know Bernie can!

The cards are stacked against you…, again, Bernie.

Only this time the establishment’s favorite is Sleepy, Creepy, Joe Biden.

At least for now.

Then we have Bernie’s proposals for “Medicare for all” and the paying-off of student loans which would quadruple our national debt, which is already at $23 trillion!

Spoken like a true socialist/communist!

abernie 12

Bernie has also routinely accused President Trump of being sexist.

But who was the one getting called out, on national TV during the democrat presidential debate, by Senator Elizabeth Warren, of stating to her that “a woman could not win the presidency?”

It was you, Bernie!!!

Just more typical hypocrisy from our liberal friends.

In addition, I believe Bernie should just call it a day and put himself out to pasture.  I mean, he’s 78 years old!  I’m not an ageist, I’m over 60 myself, but Bernie…, dude…, why don’t you just retire, relax, kick back, dream about living in Russia and leave The United States alone?

You are aware that Bernie is a fan of Russia and communism in general, aren’t you?

It’s true.  Like they say…, you could look it up.

He’s even got Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez out there stumping for him.

Birds of a feather flock together, you know.  That includes cuckoo birds!

abernie 4

Getting back to Bernie’s millionaire status, Peter Schweizer, for Fox News, reports that, “Bernie Sanders rails about [the] common good but public service has made him (and his family) rich!”

“Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., has been a loud and constant voice for socialist policies throughout his 30 years in Washington, D.C., a self-proclaimed champion of the collective good. But in researching my new book, ‘Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Political Elite,’ I discovered that while Sanders may talk about the common good, his public service has made him and his family quite wealthy.”

abernie 10

Don’t you know, Mr. Schweizer, that this is the typical M.O. (modus operandi) for socialists and communists everywhere?

Let’s not kid ourselves that this doesn’t go on in our form of government as well, however, as Bernie so aptly demonstrates.

“Perhaps no one has benefited more from Sanders’s career in politics than his wife Jane,” Schweizer continues.

abernie 3

Is she one of these people who identifies as a female?

I’m just asking…, seriously.

“When Bernie was first elected mayor of Burlington, Vermont, he appointed his then-girlfriend, Jane Driscoll, to head his administration’s Youth Office. Though the position was originally unpaid, Bernie eventually put Jane on the payroll over objections of the city council. The job was never advertised so that others could apply. A local paper noted that Sanders never bothered to provide evidence as to Jane’s ‘qualifications’ for the position.”

Did I hear someone say Hunter?  Hunter Biden?

“The appointment would remain a source of controversy for Sanders. After Bernie and Jane got married in 1988, his new wife received a big pay increase. As one local newspaper reported, ‘Political sparks flew at Burlington’s annual city meeting Monday night as Democratic aldermen raised a series of questions concerning a hefty pay raise for Mayor Bernie Sanders’ new wife and whether she should continue to hold her job as director of the Mayor’s Youth Office.’”

“After Bernie won election to Congress in 1990, Jane’s business ties to her husband rose to a new level.”

You go girl!  What good is it being married to a congressman if you can’t take advantage of his position?

“In Washington, Jane became one of her husband’s top aides, serving at various times as his chief of staff, press secretary and political analyst. After a decade in Congress, Jane and family went about setting up a company that operated under three different names to provide income tied to Bernie’s political career.”

“On Sept. 27, 2000, the family formed Sanders & Driscoll LLC, a for-profit consulting company run by Jane, her daughter Carina, and son David. The business also operated under two trade names: Leadership Strategies and Progressive Media Strategies.”

Did I hear someone say Joe Biden?  The Bidens?  The Biden family?

“The fact that this entity and its aliases were formed just weeks before the 2000 election is significant. The Sanderses ran these out of their home on Killarney Drive in Burlington. These entities served as financial conduits to run cash to the Sanders family.”

“Bernie Sanders’s insurgent 2016 presidential campaign brought in a huge sum of money. A large chunk of it — nearly $83 million — flowed to a mysterious limited liability company with no website, no phone number, and no office space. Indeed, the LLC was registered to a private home on a cul-de-sac in suburban Virginia.”

“The mysterious company is called Old Towne Media LLC. Two names connected to the company are Barbara Abar Bougie and Shelli Hutton-Hartig, Jane’s associates from the 2006 campaign.”

You don’t say?

“The Sanders campaign purchased a whopping $82.77 million in political ads through Old Towne Media, which could have earned the company a media fee of more than $12 million, based on the industry standard for ad-buy commissions. Was Jane Sanders somehow involved in this financial arrangement? FEC disclosures make it easy to hide where media buying fees actually go. Jane listed her income from her professional work at the time as simply ‘more than $1,000.’”

“When a highly respected Vermont reporter named Jasper Craven, working for the nonprofit VTDigger.com, asked Jane about Old Towne Media during a phone interview, she replied, ‘I have no idea what Old Towne Media is.’ Then she hung up the phone.”

Please note…, only liberals are permitted to employ this course of action without any repercussions.

“Even when Jane got a job not working for Bernie, it still seemed to be connected to his political position.”

“In 2004, Jane was appointed head of Burlington College, a private school with fewer than two hundred students. One of the board members of the college admitted that Jane’s marriage to Bernie played a big role in her hiring.”

No kidding?

“Attending Burlington College was not cheap; tuition was over $23,000 a year in 2014-15. In addition, the college received millions in federal money over the years and students could apply for federal government–supported student loans. That flow of money provided funds that could be directed into family enterprises. And Jane steered Burlington College resources in the same direction as Bernie did his campaign money: it went to the family.”

“Beginning in 2009, the nonprofit Burlington College agreed to a deal with the for-profit Vermont Woodworking School to set up a carpentry program. The school, launched two years earlier, was not accredited and happened to be owned by Jane’s daughter, Carina.”

What a coincidence!

“Burlington College had never had a woodworking program before, and as when Bernie hired Jane to a city job while he was mayor, those outside the family were never invited to apply.”

Remember the motto of the socialists/communists…, “Do as I say, not as I do!”

“That first year of the alliance, the college gave Carina’s school $56,474 for ‘materials charges and lease of bench space.’ By 2010, the cash flowing from the college to the family business was more than $133,000. Payments ballooned to $182,741 in rental costs alone by 2012. In total, Burlington College would funnel more than $500,000 to Carina’s woodworking school.”

“The transactions are notable because Burlington College at the time was struggling to pay its own faculty and bills.”

“Carina’s school also received at least one federal grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to install biomass heating. At the time, Sen. Bernie Sanders sat on the powerful Senate Budget Committee, with financial oversight of the USDA budget.”

I’m sure that played no role in the school receiving any federal grant money. In fact, how dare I even mention the possibility!

“Despite the academic failings of the college, its continuing financial difficulties, and the growing river of funds that were flowing to her daughter’s business, Jane’s salary as president continued to rise. By 2009, she was making $160,000, including benefits.”

“It soon became apparent that the college did not have enough money coming in to pay its debts, and it started falling behind in its loan payments. The board of directors asked Jane to leave in 2011. She received a $200,000 severance on the way out.”

“Five years later, the college collapsed.”

Hey Bernie?  Didn’t I hear you berating President Trump because of the failure of his university?

Again…, liberal hypocrisy!

Liberal hypocrisy everywhere.

WINNING!

abernie 9

abernie 11

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

What a motley crew (or “Libs Gone Wild!”): The 2020 Democrat presidential candidates!

Seriously?

This is the best group of candidates the democrats could come up with?

demcans 13

None of the current candidates conjure up any vision of them being “presidential,” with possible exception of Joe Biden.

I Predicted Hillary would run again in my blog, “I’m letting everyone know, again, that Hillary is going to run for President, again, in 2020.” from March 15, 2018, and that prediction is looking good, at least as a vice presidential candidate.

Anyway…, let’s take a look at the current crop of esteemed democrat presidential candidates, along with my official candidate classifications!

“On Life Support:” Kamala Harris and Corey Booker.  They seem to get quite a bit of media coverage, although they have been polling at 5% or less.  I believe the fact that they’re Black keeps them from falling into the next category.

“The Walking Dead:” Andrew Yang, Amy Klobuchar, Tulsi Gabbard, Julian Castro and Beto O’Rourke.  This group consistently polls less than 5%.  Beto and Julian are typically at 1% or less, yet I feel like Beto gets quite a bit of airtime.  Why would anyone care about what he says one way of the other?  Just sayin’.

Then we come to “The Cream of the Crappy Crop:” Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg.  These four typically poll with at least 13%, with Biden and Warren usually over 20%.

If Hillary doesn’t jump back into the race, or somebody else doesn’t jump into the race, one of these four will be the democrat presidential candidate for the 2020 presidential election.

Bwahahahahahahaha!

I’m sorry…, let’s get back to looking at the top 4 democrat presidential candidates.

Drumroll please…:

Number four…, Mayor Pete Buttigieg.  Of the top four, Mayor Pete is probably the most reasonable, policy-wise.  But is a small town mayor really ready to run our country?  Are we really ready for our “first lady” to be a man?  I don’t think so.

demcans 12

demcans 9

demcans 10

demcans 11

Number three…, Senator Bernie Sanders.  “Crazy” Bernie identifies as an “Independent” in The Senate, but he’s running for president as a democrat.  We knew he was a democrat all along.  Why was he misrepresenting himself the whole time?  He was obviously being disingenuous.  He seems like he’s a thousand years old, and he is not afraid to admit he’s a socialist at heart.  Your time has passed Bern.

demcans 2

Number two (or 1B)…, Senator Elizabeth Warren. When I see her, she reminds me of a “bag lady” who is wearing her best clothes and left her cart(s) outside. Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren is carrying around a lot of racial baggage, along with a lot of cultural hijacking for reasons of personal gain.  She is a woman, but will that be enough for women to hold their noses and actually vote for her?  In the end, they may not have any other choice.  She may be the democrat candidate by default.

demcans 3

demcans 4

demcans 14

Then we have number one (or 1A)…, former Senator and former Vice President Joe Biden…, another poster child for term limits and an “establishment” tool. “Sleepy, creepy, Uncle” Joe Biden is another guy who’s time has really passed.  His only claim to fame is that he was Barack Obama’s vice president, but former President Obama won’t even endorse him!  Plus Vice President Biden actually DID the things the democrats are trying to impeach President Trump for.  He may also end-up being the democrat candidate by default.

demcans 7

demcans 6

demcans 8

Whoever is left standing, you can be sure they’ll have the complete and undivided support of the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media,” along with George Soros and all of the other wealthy “America haters.”

FOUR MORE YEARS!  FOUR MORE YEARS!

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Hey Kemosabe…, “jump on it, jump on it!” Elizabeth Warren is a fraudulent Native American!

Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren has now become the democrats’ presidential front runner it would appear.

fraud 6

To celebrate her new standing in the polls, I think she deserves a little attention from MrEricksonRules!

First…, let’s quickly review Elizabeth Warren’s fraudulent Native American racial claims.

In April 1986, Warren listed herself as “Native American” on a Texas state bar registration form.

fraud 4

Warren also identified herself as “Native American” at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where she worked from 1987 to 1995.

fraud 7

Harvard Law School, where Warren taught before entering politics, referred to Warren as “the school’s only Native American professor” as recently as 1996.  Harvard then identified Warren as “Native American” on federal affirmative action forms every year until 2004.

fraud 5

I wonder if Harvard managed to avoid any tax penalties based on Warren’s designation?

Warren also listed herself as a minority in the Association of American Law Schools directory from 1986 to 1994.

Could you even imagine the outrage by “the media” if a similar discovery were made about President Trump?

There would be non-stop protests, a special prosecutor, Congressional hearings, more talk of impeachment, yada, yada, yada.

Am I wrong?

As it stands, the “mainstream media” has basically given Warren a pass on this, as have most of the other democrats.

fraud 8

Google, of course, is doing its part as well.

When we “Google” “Elizabeth Warren’s Native American claims” we get these top 10 results:

 

“Elizabeth Warren Apologizes at Native American Forum: ‘I …”

https://www.nytimes.com › 2019/08/19 › us › politics › elizabeth-warren-nat…

 

“Inside Elizabeth Warren’s courtship of Native American leaders”

https://www.cnn.com › 2019/08/18 › politics › elizabeth-warren-native-amer…

 

“Elizabeth Warren confronts handling of Native American … – Vox”

https://www.vox.com › policy-and-politics › elizabeth-warren-native-ameri…

 

“Warren Apologizes at Native American Forum – The Wall …”

https://www.wsj.com › Politics › Election 2020

 

“Elizabeth Warren apologizes over Native American heritage …”

https://www.latimes.com › politics › story › elizabeth-warren-native-americ…

 

“Sen. Elizabeth Warren at Native American forum: ‘I am sorry …”

https://abcnews.go.com › Politics › story

 

“Warren apologizes for heritage claim, woos Native Americans”

https://www.apnews.com › …

 

“Democratic hopeful Warren apologizes for Native American …”

https://www.reuters.com › article › us-usa-election-warren › democratic-ho…

 

“Elizabeth Warren releases plan aimed at uplifting Native …”

https://www.usatoday.com › story › news › politics › elections › 2019/08/16

 

Boy…, nothing really too critical of Warren there…, mostly apologetic and in the best light possible.  None of the sources would be considered “conservative” either.

Quite different from the search results that would show up for President Trump, I imagine.

Some of the keywords that would show up in a search like that, if it were President Trump, would be:

“LIAR,”

“RACIST,”

“FRAUD,”

“PHONY,”

“IMPOSTER,”

“CHEATER,”

“CON ARTIST,”

…, just for starters.

Am I wrong?

Recently, according to The Daily Caller, Warren said, “I am sorry for harm I have caused.  I have listened and I have learned a lot, and I am grateful for the many conversations that we’ve had together.”

Oh…, well, alrighty then!  Say no more, Elizabeth!  Your sins have been officially absolved by the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media!”

Bishop Zubik hears young woman's confession at pro-life youth rally and Mass in Washington

This absolution is, of course, reserved for liberals…, especially white, privileged, establishment, liberals. Being a woman on top of it all doesn’t hurt either.

fraud 9

Black, Hispanic, and especially Native American liberals do not normally receive this level of consideration.

As they say…, “you could look it up.”

fraud 14

fraud 13

fraud 12

fraud 11

fraud 10

fraud 3

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

The democrat presidential candidates talk like our economy is in a recession!  What’s the truth?   

During these first debates, I’ve heard many of these democrat presidential candidates make all kinds of wild claims about our economy.

“Many people are forced to work two and three jobs!”

“The middle-class is being left behind in this economy!”

“The only thing Trump ever points to about the economy is the stock market!  What good does that do the millions of people who don’t own stocks?”

Then we have the candidates who claim President Trump is taking credit for an economy launched by Barack Obama!

dems 12

So, what is the truth?

Well…, if these words are coming out of the mouths of democrat politicians, then “the truth” is really not an option!

dems 2

But don’t take my word for it.  Let’s look at the facts.

According to Suzanne O’Halloran, of FOX Business News, “Investors soaked up U.S. stocks during the month giving the Dow Jones Industrial Average its best June in 81 years while the S&P notched its best [month] in 64 years.”

Now it is true that many people don’t own stocks…, but many do too!

If you have a 401k, or you have a pension at work, you’re invested in the stock market.

And the markets are a fairly good indicator of how the economy is generally doing…, at least it has been in the past…, before these “fake newsers” have chosen to abandon the truth and promote their own liberal agenda.

“The last time the S&P 500 performed this well, Eisenhower was making the first presidential appearance to be seen on color television!”

Well that’s putting it in perspective!

Let’s take a look at the jobs picture now.

“According to the Labor Department, 5 million Americans work more than one job, a figure that hasn’t changed much in recent years and remains lower than it was during the 1990’s boom.”

Those 5 million people represent a lowly 2.2% of American workers…, hardly “many people,” as the democrats claim.

According to Heather Long of The Washington Post, “U.S. unemployment fell to 3.6 percent, the lowest [overall] since 1969.”

That’s the lowest in FIFTY years, in case you’re counting.

“The United States has more job openings than unemployed people, a situation some economists call “full employment.”

The unemployment rate for African Americans is at its lowest rate EVER!

The unemployment rate for Latino Americans is at its lowest rate EVER!

The unemployment rate for Asian Americans is at its lowest rate EVER!

Did I just say EVER?  EVER is a long time.

dems 9

How about women?  How are they doing?

According to Elaine Parker, of RealClear Politics, “Women Are Winning in the Trump Economy!”

“By almost every economic measure, women are flourishing in today’s economy. Female unemployment is currently at a 50-year low of 3.9 percent, less than half the rate it was as recently as President Obama’s second term.”

“The number of women-owned businesses has [also] grown by 114%, and… there are an estimated 11.6 million women-owned businesses, about 40 % of the total businesses in the country.”

Heather Long adds, “Low unemployment is forcing employers to raise pay and become more aggressive about hiring and training workers. Average hourly earnings rose 3.2% in the past year, well above inflation, and lower wage workers enjoyed some of the largest gains as companies scrambled to fill jobs and many states have raised their minimum wage.”

Now that’s how you raise the minimum wage…, not by passing some law.

Interest rates are still relatively low, and they’re expected to stay there for a while.

The price of gas is low…, and according to Javier Blas of Microsoft News, “America turned into a net oil exporter last week, breaking almost 75 years of continued dependence on foreign oil and marking a pivotal — even if likely brief — moment toward what U.S. President Donald Trump has branded as ‘energy independence.’”

“The shale revolution has transformed oil wildcatters into billionaires and the U.S. into the world’s largest petroleum producer, surpassing Russia and Saudi Arabia. The power of OPEC has been diminished, undercutting one of the major geopolitical forces of the last half century.”

“Oil historians said the country has been a net oil importer since the mid-1940s, when Harry Truman was in the White House.”

That’s over 75 years, just in case your counting.

Along with jobs and wages, most Americans saw their taxes go down, thanks to The President’s tax cuts.  The middle-class has definitely not been “left behind in this economy!”

And as far as Barack Obama being able to claim any credit for this economy…, I think I saw him wandering around, still searching for the “magic wand” that President Trump apparently found!

dems 15

So, we can see that by any measure, that President Trump’s economy is not only good, but in most cases historically good…, all-time good…, and just a couple of years ago, unimaginably good.

So there you have it.

Who appears to be lying?

Me, or our collection of democrat candidates, along with the rest of the democrats and the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media.”

If I wasn’t able to convince you after all of this that the democrats have a problem with the truth…, then you might be a liberal…, and I have this bridge I’m selling if you’re interested.

WINNING!

dems 3

dems 10

dems 6

dems 4

dems 1

dems 7

dems 5

dems 11

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Let’s see a show of hands!

I’ve noticed that the moderators of the recent Democrat debates like to poll the candidates by having them raise their hands if they agree on an issue or with a statement.

raising 12

So MrEricksonRules has decided to take his own poll of noteworthy democrats.

I asked those polled to:

“PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND IF YOU THINK PRESIDENT TRUMP WILL WIN RE-ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE, AGAINST ANY LOSER THE DEMOCRATS FINALLY DECIDE ON”

Here are their responses!

Candidates raise hands at the first U.S. 2020 presidential election Democratic candidates debate in Miami, Florida, U.S.,

raising 13

Nancy?!

raising 21

Oprah with a doubler!

raising 1

It hasn’t been verified yet if this is actually a vote for President Trump or if she’s just saying “HOW.”

raising 15

Crybaby Amy?

raising 14

Chuckie too!

Cher

Did someone ask if this was a wig?

raising 10

Why so serious Bob?

raising 2

Kamala din dong.  You put the Oooh mau mau, back in my smile child!

raising 23

Hee haw!

raising 19

“Did everyone see that? Because I will not be doing it again.”

raising 5

I really want to see your magic wand, Donald.

raising 16

Yes…, and I suck.

raising 22

I’m confused…, but not that confused.

Election 2020 Debate

Are these those two old guys from The Muppet Show?

raising 18

I’m a comedian…, only I’m not funny.

U.S. Rep. Beto O'Rourke (D-TX), candidate for U.S. Senate waves from his front porch after voting in the 2018 midterm elections in El Paso

Si…, y yo hablo espansol!

raising 4

Not Hillary too!

Wow!

Incredible!

Well…, that makes it unanimous!

In a stunning show of unity, all of the democrats polled here agree…, President Trump will be re-elected in a landslide in 2020!

Sometimes there’s just no denying the inevitable!

KEEP AMERICA GREAT!

WINNING!

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

If you have a “God problem…,” you have a real problem!

O-M-G.  Sorry.  It was too easy.  Let’s proceed.

With the democrats, it’s always about perception rather than substance.

It’s always about words, not about actions.

A recent article by Caleb Parke, of Fox News, asks, “Rise of the religious left?”  Then states, “The Democrat Party hires faith outreach director to address ‘God problem.’”

God 1

I would have to say that “the religious left” must be considered an oxymoron!  At least in the terms being put forward by “the left,” and how we perceive the term “religious.”

Although there are many different “religions.”

“Religion” can be defined as “a particular system of faith and/or worship.”

In the case of our liberal friends, many practice a “creator-less ‘big bang’ religion,”

a “religion of human evolution,”

a “religion of human caused global warming,”

God 7

God 9

God 8

a “religion of science,”

a “religion of death and devaluing life (abortion),

God 10

“religions grounded in nature,”

God 11

actual “devil worship,”

God 11

“designer ‘create your own version of Christianity’ Christianity,”

“genuinely confused Christians,”

“intentionally fraudulent Christians,”

the “religion of atheism,” or the “religion of being anti-God,” among others.

God 5

God 2

In these terms, yes…, the left could be considered quite “religious!”

“In 2012, the last election Democrats won, a headline from their convention read: ‘Democrats boo God.’  In 2016, they heckled a preacher during the opening prayer.”

They booed God?

saywaht1

say what again

Seriously?

“It’s a perception they’ve been trying to change since, especially on the 2020 campaign trail.”

There’s that word “perception” again.  Yes…, they want to change the perception, not the reality.

“Political pundits said Democrats have a ‘God problem’ and their latest move shows they are taking steps to solve it.”

Well, yes and no.  What they really want to do is solve the ramifications of “the problem.”  They don’t really want to solve the problem, nor do they actually believe there is a real problem.

“The democrats have hired former Washington, D.C. anti-Trump pastor, Rev. Derrick Harkins, who held a similar position in 2012 and has been the senior vice president of Union Theological Seminary in New York City, which recently celebrated ‘rejoicing in the queerness of God.’”

Well isn’t that special?

God 12

God 13

‘“We take seriously the relationships that we have with faith communities around this country,’ Harkins told Religion News Service, adding that faith ‘will be a priority going into 2020, but even more importantly, beyond 2020.’”

I’m sure you do, and I’m sure it will.

“Over the past few elections, Democrats have alienated themselves further from religious [meaning Christian and Jewish] voters, partly due to stances it takes on social issues like abortion and gay marriage, not to mention its focus on urban communities that tend to have lower church attendance than their rural counterparts. While [President] Trump took 80 percent of the white evangelical vote, democrat presidential hopefuls are gearing up for more faith outreach, especially in historically black churches and within minority communities.”

Mr. Parke has that right…, and actions speak louder than words.

If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck, then it’s probably a duck.

So if they walk like they’re against The God of The Bible, and they talk like they’re against The God of The Bible, then they’re probably against The God of The Bible.

God 4

“Recently Democratic presidential candidate Kristin Gillibrand said she doesn’t believe the GOP is a ‘faith-driven party’ because their policies go against her idea of what Christianity is all about, and South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg questioned Trump’s faith and called him out for hypocrisy.”

I believe Ms. Gillibrand would fall into the “genuinely confused Christians” category, while Mayor Pete would fall into the category of “designer ‘create your own version of Christianity’ Christianity.”

God 3

‘“Within the Democratic Party there is a huge spectrum of deeply faithful people,’ Serene Jones, president of Union Theological Seminary, told Fox News Religion Correspondent Lauren Green.”

And we have already discussed this “huge spectrum” of “deeply faithful” people.

‘“For too long, when we look at religion in America, we have associated with just politics and the religious communities that have been associated with the Republican Party and conservative politics…and there is a strong progressive Christian voice that is being spoken and lifted up and demanding to be heard.’”

The keyword in “progressive Christian” is “progressive.”

“Jones added progressives are ‘very open about the kind of Christianity they profess.’”

And exactly what “kind of Christianity” would that be, Ms. Jones?

The “kind of Christianity” without God?

The “kind of Christianity” that lets you make it up as you go along?

Stay thirsty my friends…, but don’t drink the liberal Kool Aide!

WINNING!

God 6

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

I may not be the smartest guy in the world, but I do know the name of our next president won’t be “Beto!”

According to Alex Seitz-Wald of NBC News, “An early straw poll of members of the progressive group MoveOn.org shows a wide-open competition for liberal voters in the 2020 Democratic presidential contest, with Rep. Beto O’Rourke narrowly beating out former Vice President Joe Biden.”

First of all, calling the group MoveOn.org “progressive” is like calling the Flat Earth Society “progressive.”

MoveOn.org is a group of liberals who haven’t had a politically “progressive” thought in their lives.

Second of all, the number one vote getter was actually Mr./Mrs./Ms./Mx./M?. “I don’t know yet” or Mr./Mrs./Ms./Mx./M?. “Someone not listed here as an option.”  This was represented by 28.8% of their vote.

Other than that, out of the 30 potential candidates listed, the results were:

Beto O’Rourke: 15.6 percent

Joe Biden: 14.9 percent

Bernie Sanders: 13.1 percent

Kamala Harris: 10 percent

Elizabeth Warren: 6.4 percent

Sherrod Brown: 2.9 percent

Amy Klobuchar: 2.8 percent

Michael Bloomberg: 2.7 percent

Cory Booker: 2.6 percent

Didn’t understand the question: .2 percent

It’s another sign of O’Rourke’s surprising popularity among national Democrats.

It makes perfect “liberal sense.”  The person can’t even beat Ted Cruz in Texas for a Senate seat, but he’d be a good choice for the democrat candidate for president though.

It’s still early yet, but MoveOn endorsed Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democratic primary. That year, 78 percent of MoveOn members voted to back Sanders over Hillary Clinton.

I have to give MoveOn credit for not supporting Mrs. Clinton (Satan’s grandmother), but on the other hand, I have to question their support for Bernie’s overtly socialist agenda.

“While the race for the 2020 Democratic nomination for president remains wide open and MoveOn’s endorsement is up for grabs, MoveOn members and progressives across the country are clear: They’re looking for candidates who will rally voters around a progressive vision of building a country where every American can thrive, whether we’re white, black, or brown, rich or poor,” said Ilya Sheyman, executive director of MoveOn Political Action.

Translation: They’re looking for candidates who can get enough votes to win.  They would prefer a candidate with a socialist agenda, who will punish those who are successful, while redistributing the wealth so that everyone can enjoy a standard of living barely above the poverty level.

“We’ll be challenging prospective candidates to inspire us with big ideas in the months to come, including at a series of events in early voting states in early 2019,” Sheyman added.

Translation: They’ll be challenging prospective candidates to inspire them with outrageously stupid ideas that Kool-Aide drinking liberals across the country will happily gulp down.

Alex Seitz-Wald adds that, “MoveOn, which was founded back during Bill Clinton’s presidency, is one of the largest progressive online organizing groups with millions of members across the country, so its endorsement has been coveted in the past.”

Let the race begin to see who can be the wackiest lefty liberal who could still get elected.

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please scroll down to the bottom of the page and click the “Follow” button.  That’ll keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

moveon 2

 

 

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑