Does the FBI and the DOJ pursue anything anymore if it isn’t related to President Trump?

We had the whole “Spygate” operation of the Obama administration illegally spying on the Trump campaign and then the Trump presidency.

Then we had the whole Russian collusion hoax, which was launched by the DOJ and the FBI, and then perpetuated by the democrats and the fake news mainstream media for over two years!  

Then we had Jeffrey Epstein, who was either silenced or allowed to commit suicide, in order to protect his influential fellow pedophiles.  

Then we had the impeachment hoax of President Trump, who was accused of doing exactly what former vice president Joe Biden actually did (a quid pro quo arrangement with The Ukraine).

Then we had the Hunter Biden “funny money” cases with The Ukraine, China, and Russia, which were smothered by the DOJ, the FBI, and the media, including social media.      

And now we have election “irregularities” and questionable voting machine software manipulation, in which the usual partners in crime ar all choosing to look the other way.   

It is sooo painfully obvious now that the DOJ and the FBI are in the back pockets of the democrats.

It is sooo obvious that you can expect that no one will go to jail over any of this, and no one will even be charged with anything over any of this.

The fix is in, my friends.   

The foxes, or better said the rats, are in charge of the hen house.

In the case of the Epstein investigation, those in danger of being implicated as pedophiles, or somehow assisting in the allowance of this behavior, are all liberals, democrats, establishment RINOs, politicians, or royals, I might add, which include well-known heads of state and successful businessmen, as well as at least one high-powered lawyer, and science luminaries.  Some of them have already been accused of participation in Epstein’s alleged sex trafficking ring.

Les Wexner, the billionaire behind U.S. fashion retailer L Brands, which owns Victoria’s Secret.

French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel became a member of Epstein’s inner circle in the early 2000s. Brunel “fed” Epstein young girls from “poor backgrounds,” and “lured” them in with “a promise of making good money.” Instead, Brunel would “farm them out to his friends,” including Epstein, “for sexual purposes.”

Prince Andrew, the Duke of York.

Alan Dershowitz, a high-powered lawyer and Harvard Law professor who helped broker a deal with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Alexander Acosta. Before the FBI’s proposed indictment could be presented to a grand jury, Epstein signed a seriously lenient non-prosecution agreement, pleading guilty to a single count of solicitation of a minor in exchange for a cushy 13-month sentence.

Billionaire power couple Glenn Dubin and Eva Andersson-Dubin.

Former President Bill Clinton and Epstein did quite a bit of jet setting on the “Lolita Express,” the press nickname for Epstein’s private Boeing 727 jet.

Former democratic Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell.

Former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson.

Media mogul, billionaire, and former owner of the New York Daily News and the Atlantic, Mort Zuckerman.

Woody Allen.

Attorney General William Barr once also served as counsel at Kirkland and Ellis, the law firm that represented Epstein for his obscenely lenient 2008 plea deal.  This explains a lot.

Ken Starr.  The former independent counsel who investigated President Clinton, Starr served on Epstein’s all-star legal team in 2008, helping to strike a deal that landed Epstein in jail for only 13 months, with work release six days a week. In 2015, Starr dryly defended his work for Epstein: “I was happy to respond to the needs of a client of the firm.”

Stephen Hawking. In addition to his time on “pedophile island,” Hawking took a boat cruise and submarine tour funded by Epstein. According to the Telegraph, Epstein “paid for the submarine to be modified for Professor Hawking, who had never been underwater before.”

According to flight logs of Epstein’s plane, Harvard psychology professor Steven Pinker hitched a ride on the “Lolita Express” in 2002.

Other notable people with ties to Epstein are Harvey Weinstein, Alec Baldwin, and Ted Kennedy.

Guest lists for dinners at his Manhattan townhouse also give a picture of his influence: In 2010, a dinner for Prince Andrew included Katie Couric, George Stephanopoulos, Chelsea Handler, and Woody Allen.

Vicky Ward, the journalist who wrote the 2003 Vanity Fair profile of Epstein, told Slate that “You got the feeling that his friends weren’t real friends — he owned them — that he was the kind of man who collected information about people and then used it over them.” Ward has also offered a more scathing assessment, saying, “What is so amazing to me is how his entire social circle knew about this and just blithely overlooked it … all mentioned the girls, as an aside.”

Thanks to Adam K. Raymond and Matt Stieb from New York Magazine’s Intelligencer and Amelia McDonell-Parry for Rolling Stone Magazine for their reporting on Epstein’s relationships.

According to James Hill of Good Morning America , “Victims’ rights lawyers who have been battling the U.S. Department of Justice for a dozen years over the controversial ‘sweetheart deal’ reached by federal prosecutors in Florida with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein are blasting the department’s long-awaited review of the deal as ‘offensive’ and a ‘whitewash.’”

Like I said, could we reasonably expect anything else from the Department of in-Justice?

‘“I think, frankly, what we got was an effort to paper over what happened,’ said Paul Cassell, a former federal judge who now represents Epstein accusers. ‘I think they’re trying to put the most favorable light on what’s clearly misconduct on the part of their attorneys.’”

“A 350-page report from the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), which was made public Thursday, determined none of the five federal prosecutors who were deeply involved in the Epstein investigation committed professional misconduct or violated any clear and unambiguous rules when they reached the deal without informing or consulting with victims.”

Of course not.

“Instead, the OPR report faulted former Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta, then the U.S. Attorney in Miami, for exhibiting ‘poor judgment’ in deciding to resolve the Epstein case through a non-prosecution agreement and in failing to make certain the alleged victims were notified in advance of Epstein’s guilty plea in state court that ended the federal investigation.”

‘“They just say he used poor judgment, and that’s their way of basically letting everyone off the hook while offering some sort of an olive branch to the victims that we acknowledge weren’t treated perfectly,’ said Brad Edwards, who sued the DOJ in 2008 on behalf of Epstein accusers, seeking to invalidate the once-secret deal. ‘But nobody really did anything wrong. It’s really offensive. It’s hurtful.’”

“Jena-Lisa Jones, who has alleged Epstein sexually abused her when she was just 14, called the Justice Department’s conclusions ‘like another slap in the face’ to victims.”

Better a “slap in the face” to you, Ms. Jones, than any harm come to any of their rich and powerful pedophile friends.

‘“Poor judgment is cheating on a spelling test or speeding five miles over the speed limit. That would be poor judgment to me,’ Jones said after attending a four-hour government briefing on the report’s findings at the FBI office in Miami. ‘I honestly don’t think that anybody will take responsibility in any sense, in any shape or form in the way that they actually should as adults.’”

The funny thing is that she thought anyone would!

“The OPR report, which took 22 months to complete, is not likely to be the last word on the Florida prosecutors’ treatment of Epstein, who was arrested last year by federal authorities in New York and then died while in custody in a Manhattan detention center.”

22 months to complete the report!

This is so typical of their modus operandi (MO), regarding the DOJ and the FBI.  Delay, delay, delay.  Excuse, excuse, excuse.  Then, Ignore, ignore, ignore.     

“Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., who requested the department review after the Miami Herald’s in-depth reports on the Epstein case were published in late 2018, harshly criticized OPR’s conclusions and vowed to keep investigating what he labeled a ‘disgusting failure.’”

‘“Letting a well-connected billionaire get away with child rape and international sex trafficking isn’t “poor judgment” — it is a disgusting failure. Americans ought to be enraged,’ said the senator, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Oversight Subcommittee. ‘Jeffrey Epstein should be rotting behind bars today, but the Justice Department failed Epstein’s victims at every turn.’”

Not to mention a slew of his well connected cohorts!

‘“OPR might have finished its report, but we have an obligation to make sure this never happens again,’ Sasse said in a statement.”

Whatever you say, Senator Sass.

“Authorities in New York, meanwhile, have vowed to continue investigating anyone who may have conspired with Epstein or assisted him in the commission of his alleged crimes. Earlier this year, Manhattan prosecutors charged Epstein’s former girlfriend and close associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, with helping to facilitate and, in some cases, participating in Epstein’s crimes against three minor girls in the mid-1990s. Maxwell pleaded not guilty and has long denied any knowledge of Epstein’s alleged sex-trafficking. Her trial is scheduled for next summer.”

Oh goody!  More investigations that will end up being big wastes of time. 

“And next month, lawyers Edwards and Cassell will argue before the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta that the Epstein deal, which also conferred federal immunity to any potential co-conspirators, should be rescinded because it was reached in violation of the federal Crime Victims’ Rights Act.”

Ah, yes…, that all important “federal immunity!”

You can ask Hillary’s friends about that as well.

“Villafaña [former federal case prosecutor Marie Villafaña] told OPR that she ‘could not seem to get [her supervisors] to understand the seriousness of Epstein’s behavior and the fact that he was probably continuing to commit the behavior, and that there was a need to move with necessary speed.’”

Oh, they understood alright.

“Much has been made over the years of Epstein employing a ‘dream team’ of highly skilled lawyers to help persuade federal prosecutors to drop their investigation. Epstein’s advocates included the famed Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz and former U.S. Solicitor General Ken Starr, best known for his role as the independent counsel in the Whitewater investigation, which eventually led to the impeachment of former President Bill Clinton.”

“During the negotiations over the deal, Epstein supplemented his team with Starr and Jay Lefkowitz, who had served in the administrations of former Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. Lefkowitz and Starr had each worked previously with Acosta when he was a junior associate at the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis. Acosta met personally with Lefkowitz and Starr after the non-prosecution agreement was signed but while Epstein’s attorneys were pursuing further review of the deal’s terms at higher levels of the Justice Department.”

Justin Vallejo for The Independent writes that, “Swaths of country believe Democratic Party is a front for a pedophile ring.”

You can consider me a part of that “swath,” Mr. Vallejo.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Are you a “Chump for Trump?”

Why do these democrats always have to resort to name-calling, especially when it comes to large groups of fellow Americans?

We’ve seen the mainstream media refer to Trumpers as “uneducated hicks,” “gun toting and Bible toting racists,” and “ignorant idiots” who are worthy of being laughed at.   

Hillary Clinton referred to the conservative half of the country as “irredeemable” and as “deplorables.”

Now we have Joe Biden calling Trump supporters “Chumps.”

Out of one side of his mouth Biden says he will represent all Americans if he becomes president, then he turns around and calls Trump supporters “chumps.”

So, the “chumps” are supposed to believe that Biden will have their best interests at heart?

You can say what you want about President Trump, and people complain about President Trump’s language all of the time, but I never recall him referring to democrat voters as any derogatory type of name.   

Naomi Lim, for The Washington Examiner, reports that, “Biden lashes out at ‘chumps’ heckling him during Pennsylvania rally.”

I thought he liked protesters?

I thought he went out of his way to insure people’s right to protest?

Or was that their “right” to riot, burn, and loot?  

“Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden aired his frustration with protesters in Pennsylvania, resorting to name-calling 10 days before Election Day.”

“I’ll work as hard for those who don’t support me as those who do — including those chumps with the microphone out there,’ Biden said Saturday during a drive-in rally in Bucks County.”

Like I said before, he talks out of both sides of his mouth…, and both sides lie just as bad as the other side.  

 “Critics were quick to compare Biden’s off-handed comment to 2016 Democratic standard-bearer Hillary Clinton’s ‘deplorables’ remark.”

‘“A sequel to Hillary’s snobby ‘deplorable’ & ‘irredeemable’ riff. They still think so little of so many Americans,’ former White House counselor Kellyanne Conway tweeted.”

“In 2016, Clinton claimed ‘half of Trump’s supporters, could be placed in what she described as a ‘basket of deplorables.’”

‘“The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately, there are people like that. And he has lifted them up,’ she said.”

You forgot pedophiles, sexual deviants and sexual predators, Hillary.

Oh…, I’m sorry, I forgot those are a democrat thing!

“The Bucks County stop north of Philadelphia was one of two Biden events on Saturday. Biden defended his energy policy at both events after saying during the second and final debate that he ‘would transition from the oil industry.’”

‘“Let me get something straight here in coal country: I will not ban fracking, period,’ Biden said in Luzerne County. ‘I will protect Pennsylvania jobs, period. No matter how many times Donald Trump says it.’”

That sounds a lot like when he and Obama when they said, “You can keep your doctor, period.”

That whole “period” thing, to emphasize an obvious falsehood, is really getting old, Joe.    

You must think we’re all as dumb as your son, Hunter!

Ouch!

“Trump supporters could be heard loudly chanting, ‘Four more years,’ over Biden earlier this month in Toledo, Ohio.”

Ha, that’s funny.  I don’t recall hearing about that before.

I wonder why?

You can see why they want to keep Joe hidden, down in his basement, until after the election.

I am proud to proclaim that I’m one of Trump’s “deplorable” “Chumps!”

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please let me know by “clicking” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts. 

We’re all entitled to our opinions.  I value yours and your feedback as well.

I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

It’s all just a part of the plan.

“The plan?”

What “plan?”

It’s a plan that was laid-out by a guy named Saul Alinsky, who’s books,   “Reveille for Radicals,” published in 1946, and “Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals,” published in 1971, which provided a rod map to implementing an environment that would lead to a unrest, a dependence on government, and eventually a socialist and/or a communist system.

ademplan 11

What a peach, huh?

He really was quite a despicable individual.

ademplan 3

An individual who has been referred to as Hillary Clinton’s mentor, and an individual whose tactics were the basis for a college course taught by then professor Barrack Hussein Obama.

Interesting, huh?

I’d say…, very interesting.

These are also facts that these two held close to the vest, as they pretended to lean to the liberal side of things while really wanting the best for America and Americans, which really wasn’t the case.

ademplan 7

You can read these books for yourselves.

You don’t have to take it from me.

ademplan 2

But, in the meantime, let me basically lay this whole philosophy out for you.

Here are Alinsky’s eight rules for creating a socialistic state, as summarized and submitted by Garret Geer for the Miller County (Georgia) Liberal newspaper:

Healthcare.  If you can control healthcare, you control the people.

Poverty.  Increase the poverty level as high as possible.  Poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you’re providing everything for them to live.

Debt.  Increase the debt to an unsustainable level.  In this way you able to continually increase taxes, thus create more poverty.

Gun control.  Remove the ability of the people to defend themselves.

ademplan 4

Government assistance.  Take control of every aspect of their lives…, food, housing, income, etc.

Education. Take control of what people read and listen to, and take control of student learn in school.

Religion.  Remove the belief in God in government and from schools.

Class warfare. Divide the people into the wealth and the poor. This will cause more discontent, making it easier to take money from the wealthy to support the poor.

ademplan 5

Yes…, this “plan” is real.

Geer continues by asking, “Does any of this sound like what is happening to The United States?”

“Alinsky has merely simplified Vladimir Lenin’s original scheme for world conquest by communism. Stalin described his converts as ‘useful idiots.’ The ‘useful idiots’ have destroyed every nation in which they have seized power and control. It is presently happening at an alarming rate in The U.S.”

‘“It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.’”

Yes my friends…, the desire for control and power has driven evil people to do evil things since the beginning of time.

Alinsky even dedicated his second book to Lucifer!  Yes, “that” Lucifer.

Hopefully Alinsky is enjoying his time in hell right now…, a “hell” he hoped to help make a reality for us all.

There are shadowy, evil, people who would like nothing more than to see this beautiful experiment of free people governing themselves to  wither and die.

ademplan 8

ademplan 10

ademplan 13

You could argue that these individuals and the “useful idiots” are well on their way to accomplishing their goals.

ademplan 9

But, all is not lost…, just yet.

Thankfully, President Trump has slowed their “progress” in a few of their targeted objectives…, specifically the control of healthcare, poverty and gun control.

ademplan 6

The “useful idiots” have added “racial warfare” to their repertoire, however, and they have been quite effective here.

These are all only means to an end, however.

At least free thinking, patriotic, Americans are now becoming aware of this “plan,” which enables us to put up a fight against it.

 

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

We’re all entitled to our opinions.  I value yours and your feedback as well.

I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Survey says, “Polls are useless!”  

We hear poll results reported to us on a daily basis.

“Most Americans believe this, or most Americans are in favor of that.”

“This politician is leading by so many points, or that politician is dropping in the polls.”

But, are these poll results worthy of even being reported anymore?

apolls 15

The Pew Research Center says, “Polling is not ‘broken.’”

Of course, what would we expect them to say?

That’s what they do…, they poll public opinion.

They’re not going to undermine their own industry, are they?

In an attempt to validate their own value, I believe they have done just that.

Let’s take a look at Pew’s defense of “survey methodology.”

“A comprehensive review of polling accuracy published in 2018 found that ‘relying on vote intention polls from more than 200 elections in 32 countries over a period of more than 70 years, there is no evidence that poll errors have increased over time….’”

Oh, really.

apolls 8

What about the 2016 presidential election polls?

“In 2016, problems with polls in a few key Midwestern states led many people to underestimate the chances of a Donald Trump victory. As a consequence, the immediate post-election assessment was that there had been a complete polling meltdown.”

And rightly so.

apolls 2

“But that ‘insta-narrative’ turned out to be oversimplified. The 2016 election was not, in fact, an industry-wide failure for the polls.”

I beg to differ.

apolls 16

The 2016 election WAS, INFACT, “an industry-wide failure for the polls.”

apolls 9

apolls 14

apolls 4

“Rigorous national surveys – designed to measure the popular vote rather than capture the effects of the Electoral College – were quite accurate by historical standards.”

Is that so?

Then where did all of the “Donald Trump has NO path to victory” talk come from?

“An average of the final, publicly released national polls suggested that Hillary Clinton would win the overall popular vote by 3 percentage points, and she ultimately won by 2 points.”

Again…, really?

I do not recall any polls reporting that Donald Trump was anywhere near 2-3 points within catching Hillary Clinton.

This seems like a bit of revisionist history to me.

apolls 6

Based on the polls, it was almost made to seem that a Trump voter was wasting their time even bothering to vote.

“Front and center among these problems is the fact that many state pollsters didn’t adjust their 2016 polls to reflect that college graduates are more likely to take surveys than adults with less formal education.”

Oh, really.

And what flawed survey did THAT information come from?

How would you “adjust” your poll in this case?

“This mattered more than in previous years, when there weren’t big partisan differences between the two groups. In 2016, however, college grads broke for Clinton while high school grads broke for Trump. State polls that didn’t adjust – or weight – their data by education were left with a biased sample.”

Sooooo, you have to be able to anticipate your poll results beforehand in order for you to be able to correctly adjust your poll results?

Alrighty then.

apolls 12

“Looking ahead to 2020, election junkies can expect to see some high-quality polling done at the national level and in many states.”

Really?

apolls 3

Why would we expect that?

Because that’s what you want us to believe for your own sake?

Survey says…, BINGO!

apolls 5

“The polling industry was founded using mail and face-to-face interviews before it adapted to the rise of telephone connectivity. It is in the midst of another metamorphosis, changing once again to meet the spread of internet access. This means we are in a period of great variety in survey methods. With that comes innovation, risk, creativity and challenges.”

“While evidence suggests that well-funded, telephone-based surveys still work [And what evidence would that be?], they have become much more difficult and expensive to conduct. Difficult because the swarm of robocalls Americans now receive, along with the development of call blocking technologies, means that lots of people don’t answer calls from unknown numbers.”

“Response rates have gone from 36% in 1997 to 6% today.”

Wait…, what?

apolls 11

“Response rates have gone from 36% in 1997 to 6% today.”

And Pew doesn’t see this as a serious problem?

Or, just a problem they are willing to overlook?

“The good news is that Pew Research Center studies conducted in 1997, 2003, 2012 and 2016 found little relationship between response rates and survey accuracy, and other researchers have found similar results.”

“Little relationship,” huh?

That would be “good news,” if it were true!

“The bad news is that it’s impossible to predict whether this remains true if response rates go down to 4%, 2% or 1%, and there is no sign that this trend is going to turn around as peoples’ technology habits continue to evolve.”

“It’s impossible to predict,” huh?

Again, I beg to differ.

The “bad news,” for Pew is, I think it’s completely reasonable to predict that such low response rates would definitely affect survey accuracy…, even more than they do now.

The question is, if the use of phone polls are fading out of these surveys, what is filling the response gap?

Pew Research Center says, “The internet.”

“As digital access became the norm, pollsters began to look for a way to reach respondents online. This method has a number of upsides [And a number of serious downsides.]. People can take the survey in private and at their convenience, pollsters don’t have to hire and manage roomfuls of live interviewers or pay phone bills, and survey methodologists have found that there are measurement advantages to self-administration. Market research surveys moved en masse to the web, and academics were drawn to the combination of low costs and ease of experimentation.”

“There is, however, one significant challenge. While there are ways to draw random samples of the U.S. population offline using master lists of people’s home addresses or phone numbers (thanks to the U.S. Postal Service and Federal Communications Commission, respectively), there is not yet a way to do this through the internet.”

NO WAY TO DRAW RANDOM SAMPLES THROUGH THE INTERNET!

Oh…, that’s the only “challenge?”

That’s a pretty significant challenge, I would say.

“Traditional survey research is aggressively based on the statistical theory of the random sample, where every member of the population has an identical (or at least known and nonzero) chance of being included. This produces surveys that reflect the country in all its racial, ethnic, religious and income diversity. Low response rates can erode the randomness of the sample.”

EXACTLY!!!

The methodology, that Pew describes here, blows the whole concept of “random sampling” out of the water…, making their surveys, and the surveys of others, virtually worthless.

apolls 1

It’s the complete randomness factor that lends any level of validity to any of these polls.  Without that, we are really left with nothing worth reporting…, unless, of course, the poll seems to be in your favor.

apolls 10

 

Thank you to The Pew Research Center, and these contributors to their report:

Claudia Deane, Vice President, Research, Courtney Kennedy, Director, Survey Research, Scott Keeter, Senior Survey Advisor, Arnold Lau, Research Analyst, Nick Hatley, Research Analyst, Andrew Mercer, Senior Research Methodologist, Rachel Weisel, Senior Communications Manager, Hannah Klein, Communications Manager, Calvin Jordan, Communications Associate, Andrew Grant, Communications Associate, and Travis Mitchell, Copy Editor.

 

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

We’re all entitled to our opinions.  I value yours and your feedback as well.

I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

The FBI and DOJ “chickens” are coming home to roost.

aflynn

Yes folks…, we’ve all heard of a chicken coop.  What we have here is a chicken coup!

A “coup d’état” that is!

aflynn 5

I have written many blogs dealing with “the swamp” and “the deep state…,” but the extent of this unholy cabal, as I am coming to understand it, is far worse than I could have ever imagined.

More concerning is the fact that “the deep state” isn’t all that deep, or hidden.  It turns out “the deep state” is really those bureaucrats, and it’s the majority of them, aligned with the democrat party.  That’s all.

aflynn 20

The FBI is full of these treasonous rats.

So is the DOJ.

So is the whole, federal, bureaucratic mess.

It’s absolutely disgusting.

aflynn 23

The process of “draining the swamp” is no small task.

aflynn 16

We witnessed a long parade of “swamp rats” trotted out during the fraudulent impeachment circus.

People often wonder how the German people capitulated to the horrible whims of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party.

Well, here you go.

First you have to assemble a group of like-minded people to help you carry out your plans and help to steer the corrupt “ship of state.”

These directors make and enforce “the rules.”  Their followers are “the tools” and the rest are “the fools.”

For the Nazi Party it was people like Heinrich Himmler (SS Commander), Hermann Göring (Hitler’s righthand man and chosen successor), Joseph Goebbels (News media propaganda Minister), Martin Bormann (Hitler’s Chief of Staff), and the list goes on.

For today’s Democrat Party, those people would equate to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, James Comey, James Brennan, James Clapper, Eric Holder, Susan Rice, Andrew McCabe, Christopher Wray, Rod Rosenstein, Peter Strzok, et al.

aflynn 19

If you don’t go along with their way of thinking, you are attacked by the media and labeled a traitor, a racist, a sexist, an idiot, etc.

aflynn 27

You may then be harassed by an arm of “their government” and potentially framed, ruined financially by “their government,” and even possibly imprisoned, ala exactly what has happened to General Flynn, along with many others in the democrats’ attempt to take down President Trump.

aflynn 8

According to Charles Creitz of Fox News, “Sean Hannity opened Wednesday’s edition of [his nightly show] ‘Hannity’ by declaring that former National Security Adviser [General] Michael Flynn was ‘unfairly and unjustly targeted by deep state bureaucrats’ after a bombshell [collection] of documents was unsealed in the case.”

My first questions would be why were these documents sealed and who sealed them in the first place?

Who had access to them?

Who had access to them, and undoubtedly knew they exonerated General Flynn, and did nothing?

Who had access to them, and undoubtedly knew they exonerated General Flynn. while unmasking the FBI and the DOJ as renegade and treasonous’ “deep state” entities, and did nothing?

“The Justice Department turned over the documents just this week, even though a February 2018 standing order in the case from United States District Court for the District of Columbia Emmet Sullivan required the government to turn over any exculpatory materials in its possession that pertained to Flynn. Fox News is told even more exculpatory documents are forthcoming, as Attorney General Bill Barr continues to oversee the DOJ’s investigation into the handling of the Flynn case,” according to Gregg Re.

What was the DOJ and William Barr waiting for? That standing order to turn over documents dates back over two years ago!

Two years ago!

I would expect this type of indifference regarding the law from the Clintons…, but The Department of Justice?!

aflynn 18

That’s why the jury is still currently out on Attorney General William and his underlings.

We’ll see about him and his quite shortly, and what their true colors are.

Our current FBI Director Christopher Wray is another story, however.

There can be no doubt that Christopher Wray has played a part in the effort to cover-up all of the FBI’s treasonous activities…, thus making him a treasonous co-conspirator in all of this.

aflynn 3

‘“Corrupt agents from Jim Comey’s FBI were discussing strategies on how to set General Flynn up on what we call a perjury trap,’ Hannity said, later adding, ‘truth be told, it was an ambush. It was an illegal, abuse of power, corrupt ambush.’”

aflynn 7

‘“According to one handwritten note, an unnamed agent asked, “Well, what is our goal here? … Is it truth, admission or to get him to lie?” To get him to lie, is that our goal? So we can prosecute him or get him fired? Is that the FBI’s role?’ the host continued.”

Gregg Re of Fox News reports that, “The handwritten notes — written by the FBI’s former head of counterintelligence Bill Priestap after a meeting with then-FBI Director James Comey and then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Fox News is told — further suggested that agents planned in the alternative to get Flynn ‘to admit to breaking the Logan Act’ when he spoke to then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the presidential transition period.”

aflynn 4

“The handwritten notes are devastating evidence of an effort to disregard all standing protocols and rules, Sidney Powell said.”

“Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley called the document’s implications ‘chilling.’”

Charles Creitz continues, ‘“Ultimately that perjury trap was not a success,’ Hannity went on. ‘Agents saw no indication at all that the national security adviser was lying. They didn’t believe he was lying. They said they didn’t believe he was lying.’”

“Nevertheless, the host claimed, then-FBI Director James Comey tried to ‘exploit the chaos’ inside the then-transitioning Trump White House team to get to Flynn, which Hannity added was something Comey would never do to Barack Obama or George W. Bush.”

“Hannity went on to claim that Comey, thus emboldened, ‘turned the screws’ on Flynn by threatening to lock him up and then threatening to prosecute his son, Michael Flynn, Jr.”

‘“They were hell-bent on punishing anyone and everyone inside the Trump administration,’ he said.”

Former President Barack Obama’s name rarely surfaces in all of these discussions about treason and crimes at the highest levels, but his name should be raised and he should be held accountable as well.

Obama

aflynn 13

aflynn 12

aflynn 28

Gregg Re reminds us that, “Former President Obama personally had warned the Trump administration against hiring Flynn, and made clear he was ‘not a fan,’ according to multiple officials. Obama fired Flynn as head of the Defense Intelligence Agency in 2014.”

So, President Obama told President Trump he wasn’t “a fan” of General Flynn, huh?

No wonder why President Trump brought Flynn on board!

“One of Flynn’s interviewing agents was Peter Strzok, who has since been fired from the bureau after his anti-Trump text messages [with Lisa Page] came to light.”

aflynn 22

“Flynn has sought to withdraw his guilty plea and has been seeking exoneration, saying the FBI engaged in ‘egregious misconduct.’ Flynn, who has said more recently that he did not lie to the FBI, pleaded guilty in late 2017 as mounting legal fees pushed him to sell his home.”

“Flynn has since obtained new counsel — and his old attorneys, it emerged this week, then failed to turn over thousands of documents to his new lawyer, Sidney Powell. Powell has maintained that Flynn’s old lawyers at Covington & Burling had conflicts of interest and were otherwise ineffective, including by not focusing on Strzok’s evident bias.”

Flynn’s “old attorneys,” Covington and Burling LLP, were obviously wolves in sheep’s clothing, as far as Flynn’s defense was concerned.  With “friends” like that, who needs enemies?  Covington and Burling LLP were undoubtedly deep state “tools” in this case, and they should be disbarred, honestly.

Sara Carter also brought to light that, “Last week, another batch of documents withheld by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team on Flynn was turned over to his defense that allegedly reveals that the retired three-star general did not commit any crimes, as suggested by Department of Justice prosecutors.”

Well, there’s NO doubt that Mueller and his team are another collection of “tools.”

‘“It’s just absolutely appalling what these agents, and then special counsel operatives, did to General Flynn,’ Powell told Fox News’ ‘Hannity’ on Wednesday night. ‘It’s abuse of their authority at every turn.’”

“[Andrew] McCabe, who has admitted to lying to FBI investigators in a leak investigation, was fired for multiple violations of the FBI’s ethics code.”

“He has not faced any criminal charges.”

Next time you’re interviewed by the FBI, try lying to them and sees what happens to you.

“The Flynn revelations come as the Justice Department separately has revealed that the FBI’s investigation into former Trump aide Carter Page was riddled with fatal errors — and even featured an ex-FBI attorney deliberately doctoring an email from the CIA to make it seem as though Page’s Russian contacts were nefarious.”

“In fact, Carter Page was an informant to the CIA about those contacts — a key detail the FBI omitted when it told the surveillance court about Page’s overseas trips.”

“For his part, after years of legal setbacks and sustained attacks on his patriotism, Flynn took a moment to savor the day’s news on social media. He tweeted a video late Wednesday showing a slow pan to a waving American flag, with no audio but the wind.”

In case you’re not really too familiar with General Flynn…, here’s a little bit about him.

aflynn 28

Michael Flynn was born December 24, 1958, on Christmas Eve!  He is a retired United States Army Lieutenant General (3 star general) who was briefly the National Security Advisor to President Donald Trump.

General Flynn’s military career included a key role in shaping U.S. counter-terrorism strategy and dismantling insurgent networks in Afghanistan and Iraq.  He served as the 18th Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, serving from July 2012 until his retirement from the military in August 2014. He became a senior advisor to Trump during his presidential campaign and served as the National Security Advisor from January 23 to February 13, 2017.

General Flynn was preceded as the National Security Advisor by the ever “swampy” Susan “I never met a lie too big to tell” Rice.

Flynn resigned after information surfaced that he had [allegedly] misled the FBI and Vice President Mike Pence about the nature and content of his communications with Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak.

Flynn was commissioned in the U.S. Army as a second lieutenant in military intelligence in 1981. His military assignments included multiple tours at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, with the 82nd Airborne Division and Joint Special Operations Command. He also served with the 25th Infantry Division in Hawaii, at the Joint Readiness Training Center at Fort Polk, Louisiana, and the Army Intelligence Center at Fort Huachuca, Arizona.

Flynn served as the director of intelligence at the Joint Task Force in Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom) and the Iraq War (Operation Iraqi Freedom).

General Flynn was asked in February 2016 to serve as an adviser to the Trump campaign.

As one of the keynote speakers during the first night of the 2016 Republican National Convention, Flynn gave what the Los Angeles Times described as a “fiery” speech, in which he stated: “We are tired of Obama’s empty speeches and his misguided rhetoric. This has caused the world to have no respect for America’s word, nor does it fear our might.” He accused Obama of enabling the Islamic State at the time.  Flynn went on to criticize political correctness and joined the crowd in a chant of “U-S-A! U-S-A!”

During the speech, Flynn launched a blistering attack on Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton. He led the crowd in chants of “Lock her up!”  He called for Clinton to withdraw from the race, saying that “if I did a tenth of what she did, I’d be in jail today.” He repeated in subsequent interviews that she should be “locked up.”

aflynn 11

The Washington Post has predictably come to “the swamp’s” defense and declared, “No, Michael Flynn wasn’t ‘set up,’” in an opinion piece by Randall D. Eliason.

aflynn1a

And who is Randall Eliason?

According to his bio at American University, in Washington D.C., where he is currently an adjunct professor, Eliason spent over 20 years as an Assistant United States Attorney and as a Chief of that section, for the District of Columbia.

Interestingly enough, Eliason is the recipient of numerous awards and commendations from the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Hmmm.

He is also a frequent media commentator on PBS, NBC, NPR, CNN and MSNBC.

Can anyone say “liberal propaganda, fake news?”

Basically, Eliason can be classified as “a tool.”

So, what’s the bottom line here?

The bottom line here is that the Obama administration, the FBI and the DOJ took the law into their own hands in an attempt to break General Flynn as a part of their effort to undo the 2016 election and Donald Trump’s presidency.

Like I said before…, the absolute bottom line here is treason against The United States of America and the American people…, and if nobody goes to jail for any of this, then “the deep state” are really the ones running the show, and our country is in serious trouble.

aflynn 15

aflynn 10

aflynn 17

aflynn 2

aflynn 21

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Dumb, dumber, dumbest!

I’m sorry, Leslie Marshall, for Fox News, but I’m referring to an opinion piece you recently wrote, titled, “Leslie Marshall: Hillary Clinton endorsement of Biden is bad news for Trump – Democrats uniting to defeat him.”

First, a little bit about Ms. Marshall.  Per Fox News, “Leslie Marshall joined Fox News Channel as a contributor in 2009; providing analysis on both political and social issues from a liberal point of view. A nationally syndicated talk host, whose program, ‘The Leslie Marshall Show’ can be heard on radio, stream, ‘Tune In,’ ‘The Progressive Voices Radio Network,’ and ‘The Armed Forces Radio Network.’”

abidenhill 4

The Armed Forces Radio Network? Talk about liberal propaganda fed to a captive audience.  I guess someone should be looking into the selected programming for our Armed Forces, and at least ensure that conservative voices get equal time.

“The swamp” [the deep state] never sleeps.

Anyway…, back to our confused and/or propagandistic Ms. Marshall.

abidenhill 2

(Marshall shown here with Sean Hannity to her left and Michelle Malkin to her right.)

According to Leslie Marshall, “Hillary Clinton’s endorsement Tuesday of former Vice President Joe Biden in the November presidential election is just the latest sign of Democratic unity that will be needed to send President Trump into political retirement.”

abidenhill 5

Wow!

Hillary Clinton endorsing Creepy Joe Biden is an absolute journalistic bombshell, Ms. Marshall!

NO KIDDING!

abidenhill 8

WHO ELSE WAS HILLARY GOING TO ENDORSE…, OPRAH?  MICKEY MOUSE?  PRINCE HARRY?  ALEC BALDWIN?  WHOOPI GOLDBERG?

I mean, c’mon…, this isn’t news at all.

DUMB.

Marshall continues by saying, “Biden has also picked up the endorsements of many other prominent Democrats, including candidates who ran against him for the presidential nomination this year, former President Barack Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California, and even Rep Alexandria Ocasio- Cortez of New York – one of the most progressive members of Congress.”

OH REEEEALLY?!

abidenhill 10

You actually mean to tell me that, “Biden has also picked up the endorsements of many other prominent Democrats?”

AMAZING!

AGAIN, WHO WOULD HAVE THUNK IT?!

abidenhill 3

She continues, “The endorsement of Biden by Clinton – a former first lady, senator and secretary of state – may not get Biden many additional votes, but it’s likely to help him raise the millions of dollars he needs to defeat Trump.”

Actually, Ms. Marshall, the endorsement of Creepy Joe by Hillary will probably end up costing him votes, and rich democrats were going to pour money into Biden’s campaign regardless of Hillary’s endorsement.

Stating the obvious and now stating inaccuracies are not good traits for a journalist to project.

“Trump’s continuing insulting attacks against Clinton – including regularly referring to her as “Crooked Hillary” and falsely accusing her of wrongdoing – are strong motivators to her to work for the defeat of a president she clearly views as unfit for the nation’s highest office.”

“FALSELY ACCUSING HER OF WRONGDOING?!”

Excuse me…, please give me a minute while I catch my breath.

DUMBER.

LOCK HER UP!

LOCK HER UP!

LOCK HER UP!

abidenhill 6

“Additionally, Clinton and Biden worked well together in President Obama’s administration and hold similar policy positions that differ dramatically from Trump’s. The sober and fact-based leadership styles of the two Democrats are far more similar to each other than to the erratic and unpredictable shoot-from-the-hip style favored by Trump.”

abidenhill 17

Yes…, Biden’s and Clinton’s anti-America, pro new world order, Pro-Russia and Pro-China positions differ dramatically from President Trump’s positions.

“It’s a safe bet that with or without the Clinton endorsement, Biden could count on strong support from Democratic voters in November.”

Are you kidding right now with this comment, Ms. Marshall?

“Biden could count on strong support from Democratic voters in November?”

abidenhill 9

YA THINK?!!!

DUMBEST.

“Many independents and even some Republicans want to see Trump defeated. For example, former Republican Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona told The Washington Post he will not be voting for Trump and hinted at supporting Biden.”

abidenhill 11

All I have to say to this comment is, these “independents” need to climb down off of their fence and pick a side.  Either you’re pro-America (Republican/conservative) or anti-America (Democrat/liberal).  It’s a pretty straight forward choice.

And yes…, RINOs (Republicans In Name Only) like Jeff Flake and Mitt Romney will probably not be voting for President Trump.

Again…, is there any news here?

Marshall continues by informing us that, “Biden needs money for ads on TV, the web, radio, print publications and direct mail. TV ads are expensive and particularly crucial now that many people are homebound and watching more TV than usual due to shelter-in-place orders imposed to combat the coronavirus pandemic.”

So, you’re saying that Creepy Joe needs money to run ads on TV and radio?

And that these ads are expensive?

abidenhill 12

Who exactly subscribes to your opinion newsletter, Ms. Marshall…, people that have recently come out of decades-long comas?  People who have been living off the grid since World War II?  Mindless democrats?

I guess I’m going to have to go with mindless democrats.

She concludes her remarks by saying, “A lot of surprises can happen between now and November.”

abidenhill 7

Thank you for that bit of wisdom, Ms. Marshall.

And, “I don’t know if Joe Biden will be our next president, but if I were a Trump supporter I’d be very nervous about the prospect.”

To this I would say, right back at ya Ms. Marshall…, right back at ya.

abidenhill 14

abidenhill 13

I don’t normally berate articles that I refer to in my blogs, but this piece truly stands out.

I would venture to say that the article by Leslie Marshall, here, could have been written by any naïve and/or confused high school newspaper reporter…, with all due respect to naïve and/or confused high school newspaper reporters.

Do they have newspapers in middle school?

WINNING!

abidenhill 16

abidenhill 15

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

 

“You’re a useful idiot.” Joy Behar speaking to Tulsi Gabbard.

atulsi 8

“Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty.” – Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister.

atulsi 12

I’ll go along with the “idiot” part, regarding Joy Behar, but I wouldn’t say she’s particularly “useful.”

Sam Dorman of Fox News reported that, “Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, got into a testy exchange with “The View” co-host Joy Behar on Wednesday [during a show in October of 2019] as the 2020 candidate confronted Behar over her claim that she was a ‘useful idiot’ for the Russians.”

atulsi 9

This, of course, stemmed from Hillary Clinton’s outrageous claim that Tulsi Gabbard is being “groomed” as an “asset” by the Russians.

atulsi 10

We now know that Gabbard is accusing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of deliberately spreading false accusations that Gabbard is a Russian asset in a lawsuit seeking upwards of $50 million in damages.

Good for you, Tulsi!

Hit her where it hurts most…, in her ill-gotten bank account!

And Joy Behar, of course, didn’t waste any time regurgitating and promoting Hillary’s idiocy.

atulsi 11

She may regret parroting Hillary in the end.  If Tulsi is successful in her suit against Clinton The View and Behar may be next!

Oh, be still my heart!

‘“Some of you have accused me of being a traitor to my country, a Russian asset, a Trojan horse, or a “useful idiot” I think was the term that you used, [which basically means that I am naive or lack intelligence].” Gabbard told Behar.”

‘“Well, useful,’ Behar said. ‘But that’s a Russian term, they use that,’ she added.”

So Joy Behar is implying that her feelings that she is an “idiot” still stand.

Joy Behar is also seemingly implying that she is some sort of an expert regarding the Russians and the Russian language.

Neither of which is true, of course.

She, Joy Behar, is the real idiot here.

atulsi 1

“After Gabbard defended herself, Behar cited compliments of Gabbard that she saw as objectionable.”

‘“Franklin Graham finds you refreshing. He doesn’t find me refreshing. Richard Spencer, the white nationalist leader, says he could vote for you,’ she said.”

Franklin Graham notwithstanding, who on God’s green Earth could ever say they find you, Joy Behar, “refreshing?!”

atulsi 7

“Gabbard laughed and responded: ‘This is why I’m here — because you and other people continue to spread these innuendos that have nothing to do with who I am.’”

“She went on to accuse Behar of doubling down on ‘baseless accusations’ that former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton appeared to make about Gabbard. Clinton previously claimed that Gabbard was being ‘groomed’ by the Russians to be a third-party candidate and was an ‘asset’ of the Kremlin.”

We have all come to realize that it was Hillary Clinton who became an “asset of the Kremlin,” regarding policy, favors, and the transfer of U.S. uranium to the Russians.

‘“I’m a soldier — because of the attacks on 9/11,’ Gabbard said. ‘I enlisted in the military to go after and defeat and destroy the evil that visited us on that day. I’ve served now for over 16 years. I deployed twice to the Middle East during the height of the war where every single day I saw firsthand the terribly high human cost. It’s why I ran for Congress.’”

Matt Wilstein of The Daily Beast website says, “The 2020 Democratic candidate [Tulsi Gabbard] lashed out at ‘The View’ host for echoing Hillary Clinton: ‘That is extremely offensive to me and to every woman of color.’”

Wilstein echoes that, “In an attempt to ‘set the record straight,’ Gabbard defended herself as a ‘patriot’ and a ‘strong and intelligent woman of color’ who has ‘dedicated almost my entire adult life to protecting the safety, security and the freedom of all Americans in this country.’”

“Over two segments, Behar and Gabbard went at it over everything from her endorsements from white nationalists to her regular appearances on Fox News. After the show replayed Clinton’s comments, Gabbard said, ‘It’s offensive to me as a soldier, as an American, as a member of Congress, as a veteran, and frankly as a woman, to be so demeaned in such a way.’”

“When Gabbard reiterated her attacks on Hillary Clinton as a ‘warmonger,’ Behar asked, ‘What’s your evidence of that?’ Gabbard shot back, ‘Are you serious?’”

atulsi 6

“Things got even more heated between the two women after a break when Behar suggested that Gabbard might be an ‘unwitting’ asset of Russia, ‘not that that means you’re stupid, but people can be used.’”

‘“That’s exactly what that means though,’ Gabbard replied. ‘Let me start with how offensive it is to say that I’m a witting or unwitting asset of a foreign country, working against the interests of my country, a country that I am willing to lay my life down for. So if you are saying it’s not deliberately, then you are implying that I am too stupid and too naive and lack the intelligence to know what I am doing. And that is extremely offensive to me and to every woman of color.’”

Let me respond by asking, WHO THE HELL DOES JOY BEHAR THINK SHE IS?!

Where does Joy Behar get off questioning Tulsi Gabbard’s patriotism?

Where does Joy Behar get off questioning Tulsi Gabbard’s integrity?

Where does Joy Behar get off questioning Tulsi Gabbard’s intelligence?

How Joy Behar is allowed to sit there and accuse an American hero, like Tulsi Gabbard, of treason, is way, way, way beyond me.

Joy Behar should be ashamed of herself.

ABC should be ashamed of itself.

And Joy Behar should be out of a job and pursuing a different line of work.

Like I said, Behar may regret parroting Hillary in the end, and if Tulsi is successful in her suit against Clinton, The View and Behar may be next!

Let the games, and the lawsuits, begin!

atulsi 5

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

The Clinton Foundation is a loser…, just like its namesakes!

According to Evie Fordham of FOXBusiness News, “The Clinton Foundation posted its third straight year of losses following former Secretary of State and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s 2016 election loss, 2018 tax documents reveal.”

afound 1

“The foundation lost $16.8 million on revenue of $30.7 million in 2018. Revenue has dropped significantly every year since 2016.”

Hmmm…, I wonder why the sudden and significant drop in revenue since 2016?

Could it be because after 2016 Mrs. Clinton could not deliver on any reciprocal governmental favors!

BINGO!

afound 7

You know, the democrats, especially the Clintons, are all about the quid pro quo, even though they are the first to see and cry about “quid pro quo ghosts” everywhere else.  This is seemingly done to throw others off of their own track, or at least to give the fake news media something else to concentrate on.

“It has posted roughly $16 million in losses every year since 2015, when it had roughly $116 million in revenue.”

What kind of losses?

How is a “foundation” paying out more than it has?

There must be some kind of tax advantage to the Clintons with this scenario!

“Foundation director Bruce Lindsey [he really doesn’t “do” anything] saw his reportable compensation stay about the same in 2018 as it was the year prior, when he was paid just over $362,000.”

Wow!  That’s a nice salary there, Bruce!  But you are, after all, a good old boy, Clinton butt kisser and defender, who goes all the way back to the Arkansas days…, the Whitewater investigations, as well as Billy’s sexual exploits in the oval office.

I can imagine they owe you a little payback, as well as some on-going hush money!

“Clinton Foundation spokesman Brian Cookstra pushed back against media reports implying that the foundation is struggling.”

‘“These reports are not accurate. Our entire 990 [Form 990 (officially, the ‘Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax’) is a United States Internal Revenue Service form that provides the public with financial information about a nonprofit organization. It is often the only source of such information. It is also used by government agencies to prevent organizations from abusing their tax-exempt status.] shows our work was fully funded by donations, grants, savings from prior years, and interest from our endowment,’ Cookstra told FOX Business. ‘In the last year, the Clinton Foundation’s programs have grown to help more people, and we are committed to operating programs that are effective, efficient, and sustainable.’”

Spoken like a true Clinton spokesperson.

Deny, deny, deny.

Apparently this form is pretty complicated!  These business reporters can’t even properly discern their meaning according to Mr. Cookstra.

“Former President Bill Clinton started the foundation after leaving office. It operates in the U.S. and abroad and tackles problems including climate change and HIV/AIDS.”

“Problems including climate change and HIV/AIDS?”

“Problems including…?”

So, it was primarily created for these other “problems,” like money laundering, an avenue to receive more political donation money than legally possible, an avenue to receive political donation money from foreign entities than legally possible, an avenue by which to “pay off” people for any number of reasons, and just money on hand in general.

afound 12

afound 3

afound 4

BELIEVE ME…, the climate change and HIV/AIDS parts get .000001% of the foundation’s money…, if that much!

afound 2

Ask the people of Haiti about all of the Clinton Foundation money they were supposedly going to get compared to the peanuts they actually got.

afound 9

afound 8

afound 14

But, of course, no one in the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” is going to peek into that can of worms.

afound 11

afound 13

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

The political hypocrisy and disingenuousness just never ceases to amaze me. 

Establishment and liberal “swamp monster,” Congressman Elijah Cummings, was lauded as the “next coming” by fellow “swamp monsters,” democrats and republicans alike, at his state funeral, ala the previously deceased establishment Senator John McCain.

aelijah 5

Brooke Singman and Alex Pappas of Fox News reported that, “The late Elijah Cummings, the powerful and long-serving Baltimore congressman who rose to chair the House Oversight Committee, was honored at a dignitary-packed funeral Friday where eulogies praised his mastery of Congress and commitment to constituents — but also took a political turn with implicit swipes at the Trump administration.”

aelijah 6

So what we have here basically is the political equivalent of The Academy Awards.  In this case, political elites taking turns praising another political elite for being a political elite.

Truth be told…, none of these political elites have ever really accomplished anything for their constituents or our country.  The only thing they managed to do was get elected and then get re-elected, over and over again, with the exception of Hillary that is!

aelijah 1

aelijah 3

aelijah 10

Speaking of Hillary…, “Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton praised the Democratic lawmaker as a ‘great man, moral leader, and a friend,’ (that’s a lie, a lie and a lie) while comparing him to the Old Testament prophet of the same name.”

Oh, this oughta be good!

‘“Our Elijah, like the prophet, could call down fire from heaven,’ Clinton said. ‘But he also prayed and worked for healing.  He weathered storms and earthquakes but never lost his faith.’”

Ya…, she went there.  She compared Elijah Cummings to The Prophet Elijah from The Bible.

First of all…, Hillary Clinton needs to keep The Bible and everyone in it out of her corrupt and lying mouth.

Then she uses The Bible, which she really knows nothing about, to attack President Trump and the First Lady…, at a funeral!

‘“Like that Old Testament prophet, he stood against corrupt leadership of King Ahab and Queen Jezebel,’ Clinton said.”

I’m telling you…, these people, these democrats, have NO decency and NO decorum.

“The line drew loud applause from the chamber, as she later raised the question of what Americans can do to ‘make sure we kept our democracy intact.’”

In the case of these democrats…, “democracy” means “our swampy and socialistic control.”

“But in between the politically tinged lines were dedications to Cummings’ legacy.”

“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called him the ‘north star’ of Congress.”

She is obviously “directionally challenged,” along with her many other psychological conditions.

aelijah 8

‘“His integrity and character, his can-do spirit, made him a guiding light in the Congress,’ Clinton similarly said. ‘He pushed back against the abuse of power.  He was unwavering in his defense of our democracy, he had little tolerance for those who put party before country or partisanship before truth.’”

Wow.  This might be the biggest bunch of horse manure ever packed into three sentences.

‘“He lifted up the next generation of leaders, he even worked a few miracles,’ Clinton said. ‘And he kept reminding us life is no dress rehearsal. The American people want to live their lives without fear of their leaders and as leaders, we have a responsibility to keep the promises made when running for office to make the lives of Americans better.’”

Like I said earlier…, he really didn’t do anything besides manage to get re-elected, over and over again…, while playing his role as a liberal puppet for his liberal, white masters.

aelijah 2

I’m sorry, but it was, and is, what it was and is.

‘“He worked until his last breath because he believed our democracy was the highest and best expression of our collective humanity,’ his wife, Maya Rockeymoore Cummings, said last week.”

aelijah 7

Ms. Rockeymoore Cummings is now the heir apparent to her ex-husbands’ congressional seat, representing Baltimore, Maryland.  The fine people of Baltimore can then expect the same level of ineptitude from her as they had come to expect from their former representative.

“In the House, Cummings, D-Md., had built a substantial power base [and a substantial bank account on his $170K a year salary]. At the time of his death, he was chairman of the Oversight Committee and a leading voice in the Congressional Black Caucus.  He played a key role in the impeachment inquiry into Trump.”

Yes…, he took his marching orders well from his establishment masters, in his persecution of President Trump, even though President Trump has done more for the African-American community than any prior president, with the exception of Abraham Lincoln.

It was reported that he was still signing subpoenas from his hospital bed, “fighting for our democracy” with his last breaths.

Yes…, such a “noble” tool he was.

aelijah 9

If you don’t want me to speak ill of the dead, then don’t use the dead’s funeral as a platform to speak ill of my president and his wife.

aelijah 4

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

 

“Brennan and Clapper sittin’ in a tree, P-L-E-A-D-I-N-G (the fifth)…, first comes lying, then comes spying…, then comes Brennan and Clapper crying!”

According to Gregg Re and Ed Henry of Fox News, “U.S. Attorney John Durham’s ongoing probe into potential FBI and Justice Department misconduct in the run-up to the 2016 election through the spring of 2017 has transitioned into a full-fledged criminal investigation, two sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News.”

atreason 16

“One source added that DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s upcoming report on alleged FBI surveillance abuses against the Trump campaign will shed light on why Durham’s probe has become a criminal inquiry.  Horowitz announced on Thursday his report would be available to the public soon, with ‘few’ redactions.”

“The investigation’s new status means Durham can subpoena witnesses, file charges, and impanel fact-finding grand juries.”

atreason 14

“Sources also told Fox News that Durham was ‘very interested’ to question former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former CIA Director John Brennan.”

atreason 3

It has also been recently reported that all of these un-elected, deep state, scumbags have started to “lawyer up.”

When Trump supporters were chanting “DRAIN THE SWAMP!” during his rallies, this is exactly what we were talking about!

Thank you Sir for keeping another one of your campaign promises here.

atreason 6

And just think…, if Hillary Clinton had won, we would have never learned about any of this.

Can you imagine how popular she is among all of these “swamp monsters” who are being dragged out into the sunlight thanks in part to her ineptness?

The problem is none of these treasonous vermin can throw each other under the bus without harming themselves as well.

atreason 9

It’s a beautiful thing.  When one goes down they will all go down.

atreason 11

This is one of the reasons why the democrats are SOOOO desperate to keep their illegitimate “impeachment inquiry” active, so as to give the “liberal propaganda, fake news media” something to focus on as opposed to all of this treasonous and illegal behavior by the democrats.

“Brennan and Clapper [and let’s not forget James Comey] were at the helm… when an unverified and largely discredited dossier, written by British ex-spy Christopher Steele and funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee, was used to help justify a secret surveillance warrant against former Trump adviser Carter Page in the run-up to the 2016 election.”

atreason 1

atreason 5

This “secret surveillance warrant” then gave the Obama Administration, the Clinton campaign and our mislead intelligence services carte blanche access into spying on the entire Trump campaign.

atreason 12

atreason 7

atreason 8

“The FBI apparently obscured the fact that the Clinton campaign and DNC funded the dossier in its warrant application, telling the secret court only that the dossier was prepared at the behest of an unidentified presidential campaign.”

The FBI then “doubled down” by lying in its original FISA application and subsequent renewals.  The FBI intentionally lied to the FISA court about Steele’s dossier not being the direct source for a Yahoo News article implicating Carter Page in Russian collusion.

These were all lies, it seems, the “esteemed” FISA court was more than willing to accept.

Have you noticed the FISA court has not seemed too distraught over the fact that they were intentionally (and it appears, willingly) mislead.

It’s all one disgusting, swampy, hot mess.  But that’s the way these swamp rats like it. The more convoluted and confusing the better.  All the better for them to weasel their way out of any accountability and any potential wrong doing.

Becket Adams of The Washington Examiner says, regarding John Brennan, “Lastly, and maybe this is a little petty, but I really don’t have the time or energy for all these piety lectures from a known liar and sneak. As I’ve noted before, we’re not so fallen a people that we deserve these sermons from an ex-CIA director whose chief qualities are being a bald-faced liar and a drone war enthusiast.”

Ouch!

atreason 20

“From spying on the U.S. Senate, to lying repeatedly about spying on the U.S. Senate, to supporting torture programs until they were no longer politically expedient, to lying about drone war kills, Brennan would do better to leave the ethics lectures to the ethical.”

Double ouch!

Debra Heine, of the American Greatness website, says, “During an interview with Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo Sunday morning, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) suggested that former CIA director John Brennan lied under oath to Congress in May 2017.”

It also seems clear he lied on other occasions as well.

There are supposed to be penalties for lying to Congress.

Section 1621 of the U.S. Code stipulates that anyone who “willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true” is guilty of perjury and shall be fined and/or imprisoned up to five years.

Section 1001 covers false statements made while not under oath. The section stipulates that “whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the government of the United States, knowingly and willfully” provides false information or conceals information may also be fined or imprisoned up to five years.

According to Madeline Osburn for The Federalist, “Five years ago to this month, former director of national intelligence James Clapper lied to Congress, and he has been scrambling to make excuses for the ongoing lies and leaks ever since.”

“In March 2013, Sen. Ron Wyder asked Clapper under oath if the U.S. government was collecting ‘any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans.’ Clapper paused and said, ‘No, sir. … Not wittingly.’ Three months later, Edward Snowden leaked documents revealing that the National Security Agency was in fact collecting in bulk domestic call records and other various internet communications on millions of Americans.”

“This was the first of many ‘untruths,’ as Clapper likes to call them. There are other lies Clapper has cooked up since trying to explain his false statements under oath.”

“Clapper leaked information about the dossier briefing to [Jake] Tapper [of CNN], lied to Congress about leaking, and was then given a contributor contract with CNN a few months later. As Mollie Hemingway reported, these lies would all eventually prove to be a set-up scheme by Clapper and then-FBI director James Comey to give legitimacy to the fabricated dossier.”

“Clap on, clap off…, clap on, clap off, the CLAPPER!”

atreason 10

“Nevertheless, in responding to the expanded Durham probe, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff, D-Calif., accused the Trump administration of misconduct.”

‘“These reports, if true, raise profound new concerns that the Department of Justice under Attorney General William Barr has lost its independence and become a vehicle for President Trump’s political revenge,’ they said. ‘If the Department of Justice may be used as a tool of political retribution, or to help the President with a political narrative for the next election, the rule of law will suffer new and irreparable damage.’”

Oh no they didn’t!

Please tell me Nadler and Schiff did not accuse President Trump of “political revenge” and “political retribution,” and bemoan the fact that that “the rule of law will suffer new and irreparable damage!”

These people are the ones seeking “political revenge” and “political retribution!”

They’ve been seeking “political revenge” and “political retribution” since President Trump’s inauguration day, back in January of 2017, and they haven’t taken a day off since!

My friends…, if there is ANY justice in this world, President Trump will receive some level of vindication, and more than a few of these swamp rats will spend at least some time behind bars.

atreason 15

atreason 17

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑