Whose side are the cops really on?

And, whose side will they be on?

As the United States proceeds down its current path of unprecedented government control, all in the name of virus safety and racial and gender equity…, who is going to enforce (compel compliance of) their fascist agenda?

Who is already enforcing their agenda now?

We here in the US are just beginning to see the cops acting as the long arm of leftist political law.

If you want to see where we are headed, just take a look at Canada and Australia, where their police are arresting pastors for non-compliance to Covid mandates, as well as otherwise law-abiding citizens who have had enough of their government’s overreach.

The only difference between the US and them is our second amendment, and a well-armed citizenry.

Australians have already surrendered their guns, and are now powerless to effectively stand-up to their government…, and Canada is well on its way to following Australia’s example.

The democrats and their relationship with law enforcement is a confused one, a complicated one, and a despicably contrived one.  

On one hand the democrats promote the defunding, and even abolishing the police, as we know them. While on the other hand, the DOJ, the FBI, and the Capitol Police have been weaponized to uphold the democrat agenda, and licensed to attack the democrats’ opponents.

And lately, we have seen this utilization of law enforcement on a more local level, when we see local sheriffs in Loudoun County Virginia attacking, wrestling to the ground, and restraining a father, whose middle school daughter was raped in the girl’s restroom, while at school, by a transgender freak who was being protected by the disgustingly liberal school board there…, when, in fact, it is the school board members who should be taken into custody for their complicity in this endangerment of the county’s students.

Let me say that again.

IN FACT, IT IS THE LOUDOUN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS WHO SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO CUSTODY AND CHARGED FOR THEIR COMPLICITY IN THE ENDANGERMENT OF THE COUNTY’S STUDENTS.

When the hell did this upside down, bizarro world, version of justice become the new norm?!

Our law enforcement is starting to look more and more like the Nazi’s Gestapo.

“Gestapo,” is really the abbreviation of Geheime Staatspolizei (in German: “Secret State Police”), the POLITICAL POLICE of Nazi Germany. The Gestapo ruthlessly eliminated opposition to the Nazis within Germany and its occupied territories and was responsible for the roundup of Jews throughout Europe for deportation to extermination camps.

Please remember that term, POLITICAL POLICE. This is exactly what I am talking about.

Just like the mainstream media has abandoned reporting the truth versus advancing the democrats’ propaganda, our law enforcement will begin to abandon protecting the citizens versus enforcing the democrats’ agenda and ideology.  

Aren’t we already seeing concerned parents, who dare question the state’s desire to liberally indoctrinate their children, being characterized as “domestic terrorists?”

And aren’t we already seeing our “president,” “Illegitimate Joe” requesting the DOJ and the FBI be weaponized against these “domestic terrorist” parents who won’t toe the line or drink the liberal Kool-Aide?

Just sayin’.

I have always supported our law enforcement officers, and acknowledge we need them to maintain a civilized society. But on the other hand, we have to be careful to not blindly acquiesce to the democrats’ idea of justice, or their henchmen who enforce it.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.  I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Our crime problem starts with criminals.

Yes…, our crime problem starts with criminals, and the democrats have chosen to support the criminals over innocent law abiding citizens.  

Howard Kurtz of Fox News reports that, “Biden moves on guns as surging crime has Democrats on the defensive.”

Not quite, Howard.  I’m sure the democrats don’t feel their “on the defensive” at all.  As a matter of fact, things are going nicely according to plan as far as they’re concerned.

What we’re seeing, regarding homicides, shootings, and other crimes, is A DIRECT RESULT OF DEMOCRAT POLICIES regarding the elimination of bail requirements, letting violent criminals back out into the community, district attorneys choosing not to prosecute violent criminals or any criminals for that matter, the defunding of police, and the limiting of police response options and general support.  

Kurtz continues, “As the carnage continues, the rise in urban crime is ‘staggering’ and ‘sobering.’”

“Carnage” is a good choice of words!

The truth is you’d be much, much, much safer opting to do a tour of duty in Afghanistan right now, as opposed to spending some time in Chicago!

In fact, this could apply to a long list of democrat run American cities.”

The democrats like to say “this isn’t a red or a blue issue,” but, I’m sorry…, this most definitely a blue (democrat) created problem that they don’t want to address.  

“That’s not some police commissioner or Republican lawmaker decrying the surge in violence. It’s President Biden’s deputy attorney general, Lisa Monaco.”

I’m sorry, Lisa, but it appears you’re just not cut-out for this job!

You may want to start looking for a new line of work.

Kurtz continues by saying, “The spike in homicides and other major crimes is becoming a political albatross for the Democrats, who run nearly all these major cities. And that’s why Biden gave a crime speech Wednesday when he’d rather be focusing on vaccines or infrastructure or just about anything else.”

Actually, he’d rather be having some warm milk and cookies, before getting ready to go “nite-nite,” but I digress.

“Unfortunately for the president, and urban America, he has few tools at his disposal, which is why he’s concentrating mainly on guns, despite his failure to get any legislative traction on that subject or police reform. The Justice Department is creating several strike forces to go after illegal gun trafficking in the largest cities.”

No, Howard…, the reason he’s “concentrating mainly on guns” is because that’s what the progressives, otherwise known as anti-Americans, want to concentrate on.  They want to concentrate on removing guns from the hands of decent, law abiding people, by trying to create all of these new restrictive gun laws.

Just a little reminder here…, CRIMINALS DON’T OBEY LAWS!

Shooting someone, killing someone, armed robbery, etc, are already against the law!  Adding another restrictive law will only effect people who are already obeying the law and not the criminals.

Oh…, and additionally, a law is only as effective as the resulting punishment for breaking it.

Again, a law is only as effective as the resulting punishment for breaking it.

If you really want to stop gun crime, all you have to do is establish a policy where if you commit a crime with a gun, you get a mandatory 20 year sentence…, minimum.  

Most of the people committing gun crimes have long rap sheets and a history of breaking the law. 

The real problem is democrats are willing to accept the costs these criminals impose on our communities as a trade-off for an excuse to take guns out of the hands of law abiding people, which will eventually allow them to rule with impunity over the American people.  

They’re, the democrat Nazis are, jealous of China’s ability to dictate everything to their people, with no fear of repercussions.  

“Biden’s workmanlike speech mostly repeated talking points on gun control (the sellers are ‘merchants of death,’ and we need a ‘ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines’).”

Is that what that was, “workmanlike?”

Struggling to coherently read someone else’s words from a teleprompter, while looking and sounding like you missed your nap, is far from “workmanlike,” and much closer to embarrassing and uninspired.  

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.  I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Gun Laws 101.

Class is now in session!

Here is my third public service installment from MrEricksonRules’ University, highlighting my course, “Gun Laws 101.”

Okay…, well, let’s get the class rolling.

Are you ready?

Here we go.

The first thing we have to recognize is that CRIMINALS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS!

Again…, CRIMINALS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS!

So, for our democrat friends, especially Illegitimate Joe, Cackling Kamala, Crazy Nancy Pelosi, and Upchuck Schumer…, here is the breaking news:

CRIMINALS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS!

GANG MEMBERS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS!

DRUG DEALERS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS!

ARMED ROBBERS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS!

Did you get that, Joe, Kamala, Nancy, Chuck, along with the rest of your clueless democrat friends?

And truthfully, there are some clueless, establishment republicans who need reminding as well.

So, just in case you missed it:

CRIMINALS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS!

GANG MEMBERS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS!

DRUG DEALERS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS!

ARMED ROBBERS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS! 

The only people any gun laws you pass will have any effect on are the law-abiding gun owners who are not the problem in the first place.

Again:

CRIMINALS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS!

GANG MEMBERS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS!

DRUG DEALERS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS!

ARMED ROBBERS DO NOT OBEY GUN LAWS! 

Okay, so, back to addressing my students.

So, whenever we hear these disingenuous politicians pontificating on the new gun laws they are proposing, just be aware that it is a bunch of hot air that will do absolutely nothing, regarding gun violence in our country.

NOTHING.

CRIMINALS DO NOT BUY THEIR GUNS AT DICK’S SPORTING GOODS, BASS PRO SHOPS, OR CABELAS.

CRIMINALS USE STOLEN GUNS OR GUNS THEY GET ILLEGALLY OFF THE BLACK MARKET.

So, the politicians can make legally buying a firearm as difficult as they want, but these added requirements only make it harder for law-abiding citizens to purchase a gun.

THESE ADDED ROAD BLOCKS TO BUYING A GUN HAVE NO EFFECT ON CRIMINALS OBTAINING A WEAPON.

NONE.

The ironic part of this whole issue is that we already have plenty of gun laws on the books to deter gun violence.

THE REAL PROBLEM IS THE GOVERNMENT AND THE COURTS DON’T PROPERLY ENFORCE THE LAW!

OVER 75% OF PEOPLE WHO COMMIT A CRIME WITH A GUN ARE REPEAT OFFENDERS!

PEOPLE WHO CHOOSE TO COMMIT A CRIME WITH A GUN NEED TO BE TAKEN OUT OF CIRCULATION AND PUT AWAY FOR A LONG TIME.

WE HAVE TO SEND A CLEAR MESSAGE THAT IF YOU USE A GUN ILLEGALLY, YOU WILL NOT GET THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO AGAIN.

It is not hard to figure out, that if we do this, within a few years, the rate of crime involving a weapon will go way down.

WAY DOWN.

Gun laws are there to protect law-abiding citizens.

IF THE COURT SYSTEM CHOOSES TO TREAT GUN CRIME LIGHTLY, THEY DO SO AT THE EXPENSE OF LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS, AND SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR CRIMES AGANST SOCIETY AS WELL.  

So, do we really need any new gun laws?

No.

IF THE POLITICIANS REALLY WANT TO REDUCE GUN VIOLENCE, ALL THEY NEED TO DO IS DEMAND THAT OUR CURRENT LAWS ARE ENFORCED, AND THAT USING A GUN ILLEGALLY WILL BE PUNISHED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW.

The sad part is they already know this, but they knowingly choose to put the “rights” of criminals ahead of the rights of the victims and law-abiding citizens, like you and me.

They make sure they’re protected though.

It’s the ultimate challenge a free society has to face.

The laws that allow us to enjoy freedom are the same laws that allow the haters of America’s freedoms to attack our freedom.  

Please be on the lookout for my next course, made available to everyone free of charge, from MrEricksonRules’ University.

Hey…, I’m just trying to do my part!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.  I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Biden should be impeached!

Based on his remarks and intentions, regarding the 2nd Amendment to The Constitution, “President” Joe Biden has violated his oath of office, and should thus be removed from office.

Article II of The Constitution, referring to the president, and concerning executive power, Section 1, Clause 8 states: “Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:–I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Joe Biden said these words while placing his hand on a Bible, a short two and a half months ago.

Now, he is already breaking that oath. 

The Second Amendment, one of the ten amendments to the Constitution comprising the Bill of Rights, states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” 

Did you get that?

“THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”

What part of that does Joe Biden not understand? 

According to Tyler Olson of Fox News, “President Biden on Thursday announced a set of executive actions and legislative proposals on gun control, saying that gun violence is ‘a public health crisis’ and the administration’s actions do not contravene Second Amendment rights.”

“THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”

“The administration aims to ‘confront not just the gun crisis but what is actually a public health crisis,’ Biden said in his remarks in the Rose Garden. He was joined by Vice President Harris.”

‘“Nothing I’m about to recommend in any way impinges on the Second Amendment,’ Biden said. ‘These are phony arguments suggesting that these are Second Amendment rights at stake from what we’re talking about.’”

“THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”

“Continuing, Biden said: ‘But no amendment to the Constitution is absolute … From the very beginning, you couldn’t own any weapon you wanted to own. From the very beginning the Second Amendment existed, certain people weren’t allowed to have weapons. So, the idea is just bizarre to suggest that some of the things we’re recommending are contrary to the Constitution.’”

“THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”

“An administration official detailed the actions to reporters on Wednesday. Among them, Biden is asking the Justice Department (DOJ) to propose within a month a rule to stop ‘ghost guns,’ which are ‘kits’ people can buy legally to assemble a functioning firearm that does not have a serial number.”

For your information, Joe, there are already federal laws regarding “ghost guns.”

“Biden is also asking the DOJ to propose within 60 days a rule on braces used for handguns, which make them more accurate; to propose action on ‘community violence intervention’; to publish suggestions for ‘red flag’ legislation; and is asking his administration to issue a report on gun trafficking.”

“Biden also formally announced David Chipman as the director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).”

“A senior administration official Wednesday said that Chipman will respect the Second Amendment while he enforces gun laws.”

Respecting the Second Amendment and following the law of the Second Amendment are not necessarily the same. 

Just for the record, Chipman is a good little Nazi, in my opinion, and should not be the head of of anything, or even work in the government, period.

‘“I’ve seen with my own two eyes what a bullet can do to the human body … and I’ve fought my entire career to fight this violence and to pass reasonable gun safety measures,’ Harris said as she introduced Biden.”

‘“What are we waiting for? Cause we aren’t waiting for a tragedy… We’ve had more tragedy than we can bear,’ she said. ‘The solutions exist… people on both sides of the aisle want action, real people … so all that is left is the will and the courage to act.’”

Yes, we know Kamala. Tragedy strikes every weekend in the city of Chicago, regarding gun deaths, and they already have some of the strictest gun laws in the country.

You seem to choose to ignore, Kamala, the fact that CRIMINALS DON’T FOLLOW THE LAW! 

“The Biden administration is also expected to throw its weight behind gun control proposals in Congress.”

‘“Enough prayers, time for some action,’ Biden said of Congress. ‘I believe the Senate should immediately pass three House-passed bills to close loopholes that allow gun purchases, purchasers, to bypass the background checks.’”

What about people like your son Hunter, Joe? 

What about people like your son, Hunter, who lie on the application and illegally obtain a firearm, and then are not even punished for it?

What good does passing another law do if no one is punished for breaking it?  

I’m sure no one present from the press thought to ask Illegitimate Joe that question.

“He also pushed for two gun control laws that would go even further than that.”

‘“We should also ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines in this country,’ Biden said. He said ‘there’s no reason’ a person would need a weapon that can hold ‘100 rounds.’”

Please remember, Joe, that the Second Amendment was not written regarding deer hunting…, it was written to make sure the people could stand up against a hostile and oppressive government, either foreign or domestic.   

‘“We should also eliminate gun manufacturers from the immunity they receive from the Congress,’ Biden said, referring to the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), a law that prevents gunmakers from being sued for crimes committed with guns they sell legally.”

To even suggest this is utterly ignorant.

Should we allow car companies to be sued when people kill and injure people with their cars?

Should we allow Alcohol manufacturers to be sued when people kill and injure people after getting drunk off of their products?

It would be nice, Joe, if you could stop and think about what you’re saying before letting this type of stupidness come out of your mouth.

‘“This is the only outfit that is exempt from being sued,’ he continued. ‘If I get one thing on my list… give me that one because I tell you what there would be a come to the Lord moment these folks would have real quickly.’”

Beside lying here, “cognitively challenged” Joe then doubles down on his idiocy.

“Republicans, meanwhile, have expressed their suspicion of Biden’s agenda which goes even further than what he announced Thursday.”

Really?

The republicans “have expressed their suspicion of Biden’s agenda?”

Wow.  These republicans are really sharp! You can’t get anything past them!

‘“By appointing the anti-gun Merrick Garland as attorney general and nominating David Chipman — formerly a senior staffer at the leading gun control lobby —  to head ATF, Biden has made clear his sights are set on restricting the rights of law-abiding gun owners while ignoring criminals and foregoing substantive measures that will actually keep Americans safe,’ the National Rifle Association (NRA) said in a statement.”

And you can add Biden’s name right next to Obama’s.

‘“Further, the proposals Biden announced tonight could require law-abiding citizens to surrender lawful property and enable states to expand gun confiscation orders. The NRA will fight this nomination and ill-conceived executive actions,’ the NRA also said.”

Good for the NRA.  At least they speak the truth, exhibit some common sense, and stand up for The Constitution.    

“House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., added: ‘President Biden plans to announce his attempts to trample over our constitutional 2A rights by executive fiat. He is soft on crime, but infringes on the rights of law-abiding citizens. I won’t stand for it. And neither will House Republicans. Follow the Constitution!’”

Those are nice words, Kevin.  Let’s see how you follow through on them.

“Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said, ‘The answer is not to restrict the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens, the answer is to go after violent criminals and come down on them like a ton of bricks.’”

Again, agreed, but why aren’t we dealing effectively with violent criminals already?

Word, words, words.

Boy, do I miss President Trump.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.  I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

What you talkin’ ‘bout, Willis?

I mean, what you talkin’ ‘bout Giridharadas?

afreedom 9

Brian Flood of Fox News reports that, “MSNBC’s Anand Giridharadas [says that] Americans’ ‘freedom obsession’ blinds them to other ‘threats.’

Oh, really?  You’re an American Anand.  What’s with the “them” reference?

Anyway…, please…, go on.

afreedom 1

“MSNBC contributor Anand Giridharadas declared on Wednesday that Americans have a ‘freedom obsession’ when speaking about the coronavirus pandemic during an appearance on ‘Morning Joe.’”

Oh, I get it now.  For the sake of this interview, when Giridharadas uses the term “Americans,” he is really referring to us “deplorables.”

Just for reference sake, Anand Giridharadas is a former columnist for The fake news New York Times.

And, yes, Mr. Giridharadas, we “Americans” do have a “freedom obsession,” since our kind of “American freedom” shouldn’t be taken for granted.  And our kind of “American freedom” was bitterly fought for and defended with the lives and the blood of millions of American fathers, brothers, mothers, sisters, sons and daughters.

afreedom 6

Our freedom did not come freely, and we’re not going to hand it over for any reason…, to include a virus, climate change, or whatever.

afreedom 3

“Giridharadas continues by asking, ‘One of the fundamental questions to me is, what’s going to be our relationship to government, the idea of government after this?’”

True Americans’ relationship with government is that of a necessary evil.

Let me say that again.  True Americans’ relationship with government is that of a necessary evil.  We don’t view government as our friend, our mommy, our daddy, or our baby sitter.

Remember…, the second amendment to the US Constitution says, “…being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”  This was put into The Constitution not for our right to have weapons to go hunting.  This was put into The Constitution to guarantee the American people would be able to defend themselves against an oppressive government.

And you think we have a “freedom obsession.”

‘“We kind of look at it at three levels this week,’ Giridharadas said.”

Three levels of our “relationship with government?”

This guy has really given this a lot of thought!

‘“There’s a primordial American tradition going back to the founders of being freedom-obsessed, even though we’re a country founded on slavery and genocide,’ Giridharadas said.”

“Primordial?”

So, now you’re referring to us deplorables as cavemen and cavewomen?

And you claim our country was “founded on slavery and genocide?”

Allow me to correct you Mr. Giridharadas.

The United States of America WAS NOT “founded on slavery and genocide.”

Slavery was a component of our country’s history, just as slavery was a component of most countries’ histories, and it was a practice our country corrected.

And “genocide [the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation]?”  The European immigrants (And you like immigrants, don’t you?) and later our young country was in a war with the Native Americans.  People on both sides died fighting this war.  And The United States won that war.  Even though we won that war…, if you look at how our Native Americans are being treated today, even though they were a conquered people, you would have to say they’re doing pretty good.  Even better than pretty good.  They are respected and supported by our government.

Our history with the Native American “Indians” is a FAR cry from genocide.

“Giridharadas continued. ‘Being freedom-obsessed to the point where we’re always so afraid of the government coming for us that we’re blind to other types of threats, whether it’s a virus, whether it’s bank malfeasance, climate change, what have you.’”

We’re not “blind” Mr. Giridharadas…, and we’re certainly not afraid…, we’re just able to put it all into perspective…, from the deplorable point of view.

“Giridharadas said a ‘more recent, kind of 40-year version’ is the ‘Reagan war on government,’ which he said is an idea that impacts Americans on both sides of the aisle.”

President Reagan was a wise man, and he put America and the American people first, just like President Trump does. Although we can track this acknowledgement of freedom back even earlier to President Kennedy.

afreedom 4

afreedom 5

afreedom 7

‘“There’s a hard version on the right, there’s a small c, conservative kind of militant version of it, but it has also infected many people on the left in this passive sense, like ‘I believe in government,’ but ‘I would never go work there,’ or ‘I believe in government but, you know, I kind of like don’t like my taxes too high, or I use trusts in the Cayman Islands.’”

Your level of confusion, Mr. Giridharadas, is truly impressive!

afreedom 2

“Militant?”  This could be, or may be, I guess.

“Infected many people on the left?”  It seems that you’re confusing some democrats opening their eyes and waking up with them being slightly “infected’” by conservatism.

Okay…, and here comes the perfunctory Trump bashing segment of Giridharadas’ comments.

“Giridharadas said ‘The more recent Trump-era twist is when…you put someone who can barely read a sentence in government, in the figure of Donald Trump, and it becomes true [that] government sucks, because you made it suck by telling everybody it sucks. I think the most important thing that could come out of this is realizing the government is not the biggest threat to our liberty.’”

Oh. No?!

Have you been paying attention to what the FBI and the DOJ attempted to do to President Trump and his associates?  I would have to say that our government [at least “the deep state” and “the swamp”] has shown itself to absolutely be “the biggest threat to our liberty.”

afreedom 8

‘“It can be a threat to our liberty but we’re threatened by many, many things and what the government fundamentally does is protect us.’”

Theoretically, our government should have our best interests in mind and be protecting us…, but in many cases that is just not the case.

afreedom 11

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Here’s the deal, Joe…, you’re a hot mess!

Mark Moore for The New York Post says, “Former Vice President Joe Biden got into a heated argument with a worker during a tour of an auto plant under construction in Detroit on Tuesday, at one point telling the hard hat-wearing man he was ‘full of s–t’ and calling him a ‘horse’s a–.’”

abiden2 3

Way to go, Joe!  You sure know how to schmooze ‘em!

“Biden, the front-running Democratic presidential candidate, was making his way through a crowd when the construction worker asked him if he was ‘actively trying to end our Second Amendment right and take away our guns.’”

‘“You’re full of s–t,’ Biden shot back.”

abiden2 1

To all of our liberal friends out there…, it’ll sure be nice to restore a level of decency in our public discourse with a President Biden, won’t it?

‘“I support the Second Amendment,’ Biden continued. ‘The Second Amendment, just like right now if you yell fire, that’s not free speech. From the very beginning, I have a shotgun, I have a 20-gauge, 12-gauge, my sons hunt. … I’m not taking your gun away at all.’”

abien2 2

What?  “Yell fire,” “free speech,” “I have a 12-gauge, a 20-gauge,”  “my sons hunt.”

What is this pile of disconnected thought?

And we have to put up with another 9 months of this?

The democrats’ new campaign slogan for Sleepy Joe should be, “Just shut up and vote for Biden!”

“The guy confronts him, claiming a video shows Biden saying he would take people’s guns away as did former Texas congressman Beto O’Rourke, a one-time presidential candidate who last week endorsed Biden.”

“I did not say that. That’s not true. I did not say that,” the former veep said.

Have you heard of smartphones, Joe?

Are you aware they can record videos?

Are you aware that when someone records you on their phone, they can share that with other people so they can watch it too?

Here’s the link to the video the worker was talking about:

https://youtu.be/oVGykWCsiG8

Now what did you say about this, again, Joe?

“I did not say that. That’s not true. I did not say that,” the former veep said.

‘“It’s a viral video,’ the guy said.”

‘“It’s a viral video like the others one they’re putting out that’s simply a lie,’ Biden replied.”

You seem to have a real problem “misremembering” recent events, Joe.

“But the worker insisted that it was Biden’s voice in the video.”

‘“Wait, wait, wait, wait, we’ll take your AR-14s away,’ Biden told him.”

Quid Pro Quo Joe’s level of confusion with this guy is impressive!

AR-14s?

And then he says he will take his guns away!

C’mon, Joe, what is it?  Are you taking them or not?

‘“Wait, wait, wait, wait, we’ll take your AR-14s away,’ Biden told him.”

‘“This is not ok,’ the worker replied.”

‘“Don’t try me, pal,’ Biden shot back. ‘Do you want to go outside?’”

Ha!  Now he’s threatening the guy and wanting to go outside and fight him!

abiden2 8

And the libs complain about President Trump?!

All President trump does is come up with funny nicknames and call the media “fake news,” which it is!

That being said…, can you even imagine the fake news’ reaction if this was President Trump saying and doing this stuff instead of Creepy Joe?

We would never hear the end of it.

As it is, the fake news media will downplay the incident, make excuses for Sleepy Joe, and then just ignore it altogether.

‘“You’re working for me, man,’” the auto worker continued.

‘“I’m not working,’ Biden said. ‘Give me a break, man, don’t be such a horse’s a–.’”

abiden2 4

Joe seems to misunderstand the whole concept of being a public “servant.”

Excuse me “Angry Joe,” but I think we all know who the real “horse’s a-s” is!

abiden2 5

abiden2 6

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

What the heck has happened to Venezuela?!  I’ll break it down for you.

Let’s look at a basic and condensed timeline, pertaining to Venezuela, for starters:

1992 – Venezuela becomes the 3rd richest country in the western hemisphere, behind only the United States and Canada.

1993 – President Carlos Andrés Pérez is impeached for embezzlement of public funds.

1998 – A collapse in confidence in the existing parties saw the election of former coup-involved career officer Hugo Chávez and the launch of the Bolivarian Revolution and socialism. The “Bolivarian Revolution” refers to a left-wing populist social movement and political process in Venezuela led by the late Venezuelan president, Hugo Chávez, who founded the Fifth Republic Movement in 1997 and the United Socialist Party of Venezuela in 2007.

1999 – The “revolution” began when a “new” Constitution for Venezuela was written.

2001 – Venezuela voted for a socialist president to address “income inequality.”

venezuela 8

2004 – Private healthcare is completely socialized.

2007 – All higher education becomes “free.”

2009 – The private ownership of guns is banned.

2012 – Bernie Sanders is quoted as saying, “Venezuelans are living the American dream better than Americans.”

venezuela 6

2014 – Government opposition leaders are imprisoned.

2016 – Food shortages become a widespread problem.

venezuela 13

2017 – The Venezuelan constitution and elections are suspended.

2018 – The country’s economic policies lead to extreme hyperinflation, with an inflation rate of 1,370,000% by the end of the year.

2019 – It is estimated that more than 3 million people have fled Venezuela in recent years.

2019 – Venezuelan protesters are attacked and killed by their own government in order to suppress their dissidence.

 

Venezuela’s socialist governments have been in power since 1999, taking over the country at a time when Venezuela had huge inequality.

But the socialist polices brought in which aimed to help the poor backfired, and made the situation even worse, of course.  Companies now controlled by the government failed, and price controls to make basic goods more affordable to the poor by capping prices meant that Venezuelan businesses no longer found it profitable to produce them.  Eventually, the government subsidies of all facets of the economy were unsustainable.

In only 27 years Venezuela has turned a “rags to riches” story into a “riches to rags” story.

venezuela 5

Like Margaret Thatcher, the former Britsh Prime Minister once said, “The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”

Does any of the Venezuela story sound familiar today in America?

There certainly appear to be some similarities in the early stages happening here.

venezuela 2

We see an impeachment happy democrat Congress trying to overturn a presidential election.

We see many democrat politicians and democrat presidential candidates calling for a new constitution or drastic changes to our existing one.

venezuela 10

We constantly hear democrat politicians and democrat presidential candidates touting government solutions for “income inequality,” don’t we?

venezuela 9

We hear democrat politicians and democrat presidential candidates calling for a complete government takeover of our healthcare system.

Many democrat politicians and democrat presidential candidates are proposing “free” college.

And lastly, we hear many democrat politicians and democrat presidential candidates calling for radical changes to our gun laws, changes to the 2nd amendment or the complete removal of our right to bear arms.

The intentions of the American democrat party are apparent.

The democrats want to destroy America as we know it.

venezuela 3

The choice here is painfully clear.

If you want to follow in Venezuela’s footsteps…, elect democrats.

It’s as simple as that.

The only people who benefit from a socialist government are those in government.

venezuela 7

They apparently long for power that badly that they are willing to turn everyone elses life into a living hell for their own sakes.

They can only do this if we let them, however.

Remember…, the Venezuelan people voted for what they got.

In the end…, it’s their own fault.

And in the end…, we’ll choose our own fate as well.

venezuela 12

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑