According to Victor Morton of The Washington Times, “The attorney representing the Ukraine whistleblower tweeted about starting a “coup” against President Trump that would end with his impeachment almost as soon as he took the oath of office.”
Hmmm, you don’t say?
Only 10 days after President Trump’s inauguration ceremony, “Mark S. Zaid wrote on his certified Twitter account on Jan. 30, 2017, Mr. Trump’s 11th day in power, “#coup has started. First of many steps. #rebellion. #impeachment will follow ultimately. #lawyers https://t.co/FiNBQo6v0S — Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) January 31, 2017’”
I notice Zaid uses “Esq” in his twitter “handle,” or user name. The usage of “Esq” seems pretty haughty. “Esq.” is an abbreviation for esquire, which is a title used by attorneys in the United States. The term esquire has a different meaning in English Law. It is a title used to signify dignity, which ranks above gentleman and directly below knight. It is a title of respect accorded to men of higher social rank.
I only mention this because this is a common liberal trait…, thinking they are better than or above the rest of us…, of a “higher social rank.”
It just helps understand where Mr. Zaid Esq. is coming from.
“Mr. Zaid’s tweet was in response to the firing of Sally Yates as acting attorney general for refusing to follow Mr. Trump’s orders on immigration policy.”
It was at this point that the treasonous members of the deep state realized they weren’t running the show, and they didn’t like it!
“Mr. [President] Trump referred to the story at a campaign rally in Louisiana on Wednesday night, calling the attorney a ‘sleaze ball.’”
Nicely put, Mr. President!
‘“It’s all a hoax, it’s a scam,’ the president said.”
“According to a report on Fox News, Mr. Zaid also repeatedly crowed about how ‘we’ and the media will force Mr. Trump from office.”
‘“I predict @CNN will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president,’ he wrote in one tweet and ‘we will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters’ in another.”
“Both tweets were posted in July 2017, almost two years before Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was even in office to speak with Mr. Trump on the phone.”
“The Trump reelection campaign said the tweets prove that Democrats’ complaints about impeachable offenses have always been about bad-faith searches for a pretext.”
They also add additional proof that there actually was, and is, a treasonous deep state community that needs to be dealt with…, with extreme prejudice.
“Added Donald Trump Jr.: ‘Of course he did. Everyone knows the coup started on November 9, 2016. Quit your fake sanctimony! Everybody who’s been watching this [b.s.] for three years sees what a farce it has been all along.’”
Gregg Re of Fox News reported, “Trump hits whistleblower attorney’s 2017 plan for a ‘coup’ against his administration.”
“President Trump, at a [Keep America Great] campaign rally in Louisiana Wednesday night, unloaded on whistleblower attorney Mark Zaid, after a Fox News article from earlier in the day revealed that Zaid had tweeted about the beginning of a ‘coup’ against the president back in 2017.”
“The president extensively quoted from the article, which reported that Zaid has long called for Trump’s impeachment — even promising two years ago, ‘We will get rid of him.’”
“Zaid now represents the intelligence community whistleblower who is at the center of Democrats’ impeachment inquiry against the president. The whistleblower has alleged that, earlier this year, Trump improperly threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine for political reasons.”
‘“Democrats must be accountable for their hoaxes and their crimes,’ Trump said, holding a printout of the Fox News piece.”
‘“I don’t know if you saw, I’m just coming off the plane, and they hand me — look at this character. They just hand me this story, “’Coup has started,” whistleblower attorney said in 2017.’”
“Trump added: ‘That was a long time ago. It’s all a hoax. They say, January 2017 — a “coup has started,” and the “impeachment will follow ultimately.” It’s all a hoax. It’s a scam. And, you know who helps them? These people back here — the media.’”
“And, amid a slew of impeachment-related posts, Zaid assured his Twitter followers that ‘as one falls, two more will take their place,’ apparently referring to Trump administration employees defying the White House.”
‘“Can you believe this?” Trump asked. ‘Just came out. It’s a disgrace. These people are bad people. They rip the guts out of our country.’”
“Trump also hammered The Washington Post, saying, ‘19 minutes after I took the oath of office, the horrible, disgusting Washington Post — which is a terrible paper — an article comes out, ‘The campaign to impeach President Trump has begun.’”
‘“Is there any place you would rather be than a Trump rally, on a beautiful evening in Louisiana?’ Trump asked, as the crowd chanted, ‘lock her up,’ and cheered.”
My answer is ‘no.” I know I enjoy your rallies, Mr. President, and I wish I could have been there.
“Over a thousand people were gathered outside the Monroe Civic Center early Wednesday morning, and over 40,000 people obtained tickets for the event!”
Now…, regarding our pathetic, “hearsay” whistleblower…, Dr. Sebastian Gorka tweeted that the alleged “whistleblower” is believed to be, one, Eric Ciaramella.
Parts of Mr. Ciaramella’s “illustrious resume” include:
Protégé of former CIA Director, John “the treasonous turd” Brennan. Brennan was also the one who sent him to work in The White House during Obama’s reign.
Ciaramella also worked for Susan “the puppet” Rice.
He travelled with and advised then Vice President “sleepy, creepy” Joe Biden on The Ukraine.
Well…, you get the picture.
“Ciaramella.” That sounds like some kind of sickness or disease, like salmonella!
Maybe we should adopt that name as the disease of the liberal mind?!
Is it just me, or do these tweezer necked, sissy boy, liberal turds all look the same?
The question is was there a whistleblower looking for an attorney or was there a congressman (“Shifty” Adam Schiff) and an attorney looking for a willing accomplice and a whistleblower?
I would tend to believe it was the latter.
In either case…, it appears the democrats are becoming less and less interested in allowing their whistleblower to testify or be cross examined. I wonder why that is?
WINNING!
NOTE: If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article. From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.
Thank you, MrEricksonRules.
Mr. Erickson Rules! 
Leave a Reply