Howard Stern isn’t “feeling the Bern!”

According to Tyler McCarthy of Fox News, “Howard Stern denounces Bernie Sanders as ‘Karl Marx Jr.’ and says he can’t beat Trump.”

In 2016 Howard Stern didn’t think Donald Trump could beat Hillary either, soooooo…

“Howard Stern laid into Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders during a recent episode of his show, referring to the self-proclaimed democratic socialist as ‘Karl Marx Jr.’”

ahoward 5

“The host was discussing the coronavirus [another topic he is ill-informed and confused about] during a segment on his popular SiriusXM show ahead of Super Tuesday before some big wins in key states allowed Joe Biden to contest what had been Sanders’ runaway victory to that point. Stern noted that he was less worried about the virus and more concerned with what’s going on in politics.”

First of all, it was nice to hear Howard commenting on the topic of the day for once.  It seems like all I’ve been hearing lately are reruns talking about things that happened ages ago.

‘“I’m more concerned that Karl Marx. Jr. is going to get the Democratic nomination,’ he said in a clip shared by Twitter user Barry Rubin.”

ahoward 7

“His co-host, Robin Quivers, asked the 66-year-old if he was, in fact, referring to Sanders.”

‘“Yeah! It’s unbelievable. Listen if a Democrat wants to win against Trump, we can’t have Karl Marx Jr.,’ Stern continued. [Hmmm, that’s funny.  What’s all this “we” stuff regarding the democrats?  Stern always refers to himself as an independent.  Of course, Sanders refers to himself as an independent as well, sooooo…] ‘Karl Marx. Jr. ain’t going to win the general election. It’s not going to happen. [Again…, he said the same thing about Donald Trump in 2016.] What they need is a good, strong moderate to be the candidate and Karl Marx Jr. backed Casto, and Karl Marx Jr., all the sh– he wants to get through. All the free Medicaid and all the free college. No one is going to pay for it. No one in Congress, Democrats or Republicans, are going to approve it and neither is the Senate, so we’re going to be sitting there…’”

ahoward 6

“Stern went on to lambaste the candidate for his attacks on billionaires in the United States, going as far as to do an impression of Sanders.”

“‘I don’t think there should be any billionaires, we should take that away,’” Stern said while imitating Sanders. “I would have turned to him and said, ‘OK, now there’s an interesting notion…’”

“Stern continued: ‘All of America is based on… So tell me, give me your utopian vision, Karl. How much money should anyone be allowed to make? And by the way, Bernie, when I’m president, I don’t like people who have three homes. So, I’m going to take away two of your homes because you have three of them. How do you feel about that? I don’t believe he’s going to win the general election so if you’re a Democrat and you don’t like Trump, I mean… I think Trump is probably doing a dance.’”

ahoward 1

“Stern takes the presidential race against Donald Trump seriously, having previously revealed during a ‘Good Morning America’ interview in May 2019 that he feels partially responsible for getting Trump elected in the first place.”

I seriously doubt that, Howard…, but you can indulge yourself in your little ego trip regarding your relevance and importance all you want, I guess.

ahoward 4

‘“The way I helped Donald was I let him come on and be a personality. Whether you liked him or not, people related to him as a human being,’ Stern said, adding that he wishes he had been able to do the same for Hillary Clinton, who he said he ‘wanted to see’ win.”

Now that’s a tall order, Howard…, I mean helping people relate to Hillary as a human being.

Stern has now gone on to say that he backs creepy, sleepy Joe Biden now…, after he backed Mike Bloomberg that is.

Stern said he wants to “return to the normalcy” of the Obama years with Biden.  He wants to “return to the way things were” before President Trump, under Obama and Biden.

Really, Howard?

You want millions of people to lose their newly found jobs?

You want millions of people to go back to being reliant on food stamps?

You want all of the thousands of manufacturing companies that have re-opened in America to shut down again?

You want to return to the days when we were dependent on Middle Eastern oil and gas prices near $4.00 a gallon?

You want to return to the days of America being taken advantage of regarding all of those flawed international trade deals?

You want to return to the days when American jobs were being shipped overseas faster than you could say “hope and change?”

You want to return to the days of “the swamp” and its influence and size expanding at a dizzying rate?

You want to return to the days of a dilapidated and under-funded military?

You want to return to the days when treasonous soldiers were pardoned and celebrated, while real American heroes were framed and charged with politically correct “crimes?”

You want to return to the days when The President could order billions of dollars to be loaded up on an unmarked plane, in the middle of the night, and flown over to Iran, without the media saying a word about it?

That’s what you’re longing for?

C’mon, Howard!

Quit being a tool for the democrat establishment!

Grab that shaggy hair of yours with both hands and pull your head out of you’re a$$!

Howard went on to suggest he could give Quid Pro Quo Joe some advice and tips on what he should say going forward and how he should handle President Trump during the debates.

ahoward 8

Stern’s suggestions for sleepy Joe were actually quite comical…, as if Biden would be able to control President Trump during a debate!

Consider President Trump and this opening statement in their first debate, Howard:

“I’m sure you’re aware, Joe, of what you and your democrat friends tried, and failed, to impeach me for.”

“They tried to imply that I threatened the Ukrainian president, which I didn’t, with a withholding of funds, which we didn’t, if he failed to investigate your possible corruption prior to the 2016 election, which he didn’t do.”

“It’s pretty hard to have a “quid pro quo” arrangement, Joe, when there is no “quid” and there is no “quo.”

“You, Joe, on the other hand, are on tape, however, bragging about doing EXACTLY what you and your friends accused me of doing.”

ahoward 9

“You said, and I’ll read your EXACT quote.  You said, ‘I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. He got fired.’”

“Now THAT, Joe, is a textbook example of the president of The Ukraine being threatened with a “quid pro quo.”

“What you actually DID is what you and your friends, and the fake news media, tried to hang on me.”

“You not only admitted it in your own words, but you bragged about it!  And all of your friends there in the fake news media laughed about it!”

“None of your democrat friends or the fake news media seemed to have any problems with what you DID, but they spent over 6 months fighting to breathe life into the hoax that I did what you actually did.”

“And you and your democrat friends will not admit that the fake news, mainstream media, is an arm of the democrat party used for liberal propaganda, when it is quite obvious they are.”

“In my opinion, we can bypass any investigation involving you and Ukraine and proceed right to the sentencing phase.  You obviously broke multiple laws and you publicly confessed to breaking those laws.”

“Secondly, we have the events surrounding your son, Hunter, Joe.”

ahoward 11

“Here we have a young man who flies into China with you on Air Force Two, and somehow flies home with millions of dollars in his investment fund.  Then he ends up being put on the board of a Ukrainian gas company and gets paid over $50 thousand a month.  Both of these countries being places where you have quite a bit of influence, being The Vice President of The United States.  But you claim to have no knowledge of any of his activities.”

ahoward 10

“I’m not even going to argue the legality or the appropriateness of any of that right now, Joe.”

“But I am going to ask the American people to please stop and consider what I’m about to say.”

“Suppose my sons, Eric or Don Jr., or my daughters, Ivanka or Tiffany, were involved in some sweetheart deals like your son, Hunter?”

“What do you think your democrat friends or the fake news media would have to say about that?”

“I think they all would have all lost their minds and would have launched endless investigations into my children and I.”

“Seriously, it would have been an absolute circus.”

“Can anybody even argue that assumption?”

“Now I ask the American people, why does the fake news media choose to look the other way in Hunter Biden’s, your son’s case, Joe, but you know darn well they would absolutely crucify my children and I?”

“It’s not just a bias, Joe…, it’s a concerted effort to misinform and manipulate the American people.”

“It’s like I said before, you and your democrat friends will not admit that the fake news, mainstream media, is an arm of the democrat party used for liberal propaganda, when it is quite obvious they are.”

“I am appealing to the American people to recognize what has been going on here with the fake news media.  Hold them accountable, and demand that they report the news fairly and honestly on your behalf and in your interests…, not the best interest of just one party…, the democrat party.”

How do you like that, Howard?

I think that’s much better than the weak sauce you came up with for Creepy Joe.

That is how President Trump destroys Joe Biden, the democrat party, and the liberal propaganda, fake news media within 5 minutes of their first debate.

You have been thoroughly destroyed during this blog as well, Howard…, how does it feel?

Maybe you could help Sleepy Joe prepare for his annihilation?

Hey…, the democrats are the ones who decided to open up this can of worms…, and these worms ain’t going back in the can!

Remember, Howard Stern, and your democrat friends…, be careful what you wish for, because you just might get it.

WINNING!

ahoward 12

ahoward 13

P.S. – Hey Howard…, you’re looking a little long in the tooth these days. It won’t be long until you have that Don Imus and Larry King vibe going on!  Just sayin’.

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

WE MUST STOP BERNIE NOW! (Said the old establishment democrats.)

asuper 6

Why would Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar end their presidential campaigns ONE DAY BEFORE Super Tuesday?

Why would Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar end their presidential campaigns one day before over a third of all democrat delegates were up for grabs?

Why would Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar end their presidential campaigns after a year of campaigning…, after a year of spending millions of dollars…, after a year of giving endless speeches…, one day before over a third of all democrat primary delegates are decided?

asuper 2

And why would they suddenly endorse Sleepy Joe Biden?

Someone must have made it extremely worth their while.

The question is…, who would stand to benefit the most from them dropping out one day before the primaries on Super Tuesday?

Who needs to make a good, or better, showing on Super Tuesday…, Biden, Bernie or Bloomberg?

I believe the answer to that question would be “creepy and confused” Joe Biden.

asuper 1

Now…, who was in a position to make their drop-outs happen?

asuper 3

I don’t believe Bernie needs their help in the first place, so I’m ruling him out.

Bloomberg can afford to do anything he wants, and he probably stands to pick-up the most votes in this scenario as well.

The democrat establishment behind Biden wields a lot of money power and a lot of political positional power.

In the final analysis, it’s my belief that it was the anti-Bernie establishment democrats who were responsible for Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar bowing out the day before Super Tuesday.

“Creepy and confused” Joe Biden and Mini-Mike Bloomberg will both benefit because of this, although Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar specifically endorsed Joe Biden, which tipped the hands of the establishment democrats.

The establishment democrats, however, are in the unenviable position of trying to rally behind “gaffemaster” Joe.

No sooner had Sleepy Joe received the hurried endorsements of Mayor Pete, Amy Klobuchar and Beto O’Rourke, during his campaign rally speech in Houston, TX Monday, Creepy Joe ended up declaring his stupidity rather recalling the Declaration of Independence.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident…, all men and women created by the, you know…, you know, the thing,” he said.

Then, in the same speech, Creepy Joe referred to Super Tuesday as Super Thursday!

“Look, tomorrow’s Super Thurs…, Tuesday,” he said, as members of the audience laughed and shook their heads. “I’ll tell you what, I’m rushing ahead, aren’t I?” he then said.

No, Creepy and confused” Joe…, you’re just a hot mess, and all of those people can’t believe who they’re left to vote for!

Of course, the liberal propaganda, fake news media co-conspirators, has chosen to spin Biden’s gaffes into something less concerning.

Dana Milbank of The Washington Post says, “Joe Biden isn’t just a gaffe machine.  He’s the Lamborghini of gaffes.”

asuper 4

He continues by saying, “Some say it’s unfair to draw attention to Biden when President Trump is the most mendacious [that’s “lying” to all of us uneducated deplorables] politician ever.  I disagree: Biden’s gaffes are to be celebrated, for they make him exciting. When he opens his mouth, nobody knows what is going to come out — least of all Biden.”

Did you get that?

“Biden’s gaffes are to be celebrated.”

And “President Trump is the most [lying] politician ever.”

It’s funny how that works, isn’t it?

Mr. Milbank was also very sure Donald Trump would not become President back in 2016.

asuper 8

How did eating that article taste, anyway?

Ha!

I’m sure he never ate it, just like the other windbags never left the country.

The democrats can spin it any way they want, but the bottom line remains…, their choices come down to a commie, a confused creeper and a pompous pretender.

asuper 7

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

 

Russian interference?!  Did you say “Russian interference” again?!  You did, you did say “Russian interference” again?! 

Is the fake news, liberal propaganda, really serious about this…, again?!

Really?!

It’s only February!

aelect 2

Please don’t tell me we are going to have to listen to this fairy tale garbage again for the next 9 months, leading up to the November election.

Please!

aelect 3

And then after President Trump wins it’ll be déjà vu all over again as well with this Russian crap…, again.

I guess our only hope is that CNN and MSNBC will have been completely discredited by that time and shut down.

According to Jim Acosta, Zachary Cohen, Dana Bash, Jeremy Herb, Jake Tapper, Alex Marquardt, Paul LeBlanc, Vivian Salama and Kaitlan Collins of CNN, “Russia is looking to help Trump win in 2020, election security official told lawmakers.”

aelect 4

Is there anyone at CNN who didn’t contribute to this piece of liberal propaganda?

Just sayin’!

“Washington (CNN) – The intelligence community’s top election security official delivered a briefing to lawmakers last week warning them that the intelligence community believes Russia is already taking steps to interfere in the 2020 election with the goal of helping President Donald Trump win, three sources familiar with the matter tell CNN.”

Okay, people…, time out.

Let’s stop for a minute and think about this.

Let’s stop for a minute and use our brains.

aelect 18

First, the fact that Russia wants to mess with our election is a given.  No news there at all.

But second…, you’re telling me that Russia wants to help President Trump get re-elected?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has the U.S.’s economy roaring?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has rebuilt America’s military to the strongest it’s been in our history and the strongest currently in the world?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has overseen the U.S. become oil independent from the Middle East?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has established a new branch of our military, The Space Force, which has been created to guarantee the U.S. has dominance in space over countries like Russia and China?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has placed embargos and other economic restrictions on them and many of their “friends” around the world?

That President Trump?

That’s the President Trump “The intelligence community’s top election security official” is talking about?

aelect 17

Excuse me Ms. “The intelligence community’s top election security official” if I call you out for what you obviously are…, just another liar and “deep state” tool who is being used to spread anti-Trump propaganda.

“Last week’s briefing, led by election security official Shelby Pierson and first reported by The New York Times, addressed the overall picture of Russia’s efforts, including hacking, weaponizing social media and attacks on election infrastructure, one of the sources said.”

aelect 1

“The briefers said Russia does favor Trump, but that helping Trump wasn’t the only thing they were trying to do as it was also designed to raise questions about the integrity of the elections process, the source added.”

And of course the democrats want to lay the groundwork about the “integrity of the election process” in order cover their butts and fit their narrative after the democrats get annihilated in the 2020 presidential and congressional elections.

Please refer to my section above again as to why the Russians would, of course, favor President Trump.

Acosta, Cohen, Bash and Herb of CNN continue, “Russia’s interference in the 2016 election — which the US intelligence community believes was aimed at boosting Trump’s candidacy and hurting his opponent, Hillary Clinton — led to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. The prospect of interference in 2020 will further test US defenses against foreign meddling, which Trump has repeatedly downplayed as he has dismissed any suggestion that Kremlin influence played a role in his election.”

aelect 14

Okay…, please, let’s take another time out here.

I’m sorry, but wasn’t the “Russian collusion hoax” been put to bed?

aelect 11

Wasn’t the fraudulently initiated Mueller investigation completed, after wasting two years of our time and coming up with NOTHING regarding President Trump and “Russian collusion?”

aelect 7

aelect 9

aelect 8

And again…, I’m sorry but wasn’t it President Obama who was aware of this “Russian election interference” in 2015 and 2016 but did nothing about it?

Wasn’t it President Obama and his deep state minions who were aware of this “Russian election interference” in 2015 and 2016 and failed to inform candidate Trump about it, but rather used it as an excuse to spy on his campaign and then frame him with the “Russian collusion hoax?”

Obama

Ha!  It’s funny how I never hear that mentioned by any of our “friends” in the fake news, liberal propaganda media.

Again…, let’s take a moment and use our brains here.

Wouldn’t it make more sense to believe that the Russians would be more inclined to “help” the democrats’ front runner, Bernie Sanders?

According to Joseph Simonson of The Washington Examiner, Bernie Sanders has been quoted as saying, ‘“I don’t mind people calling me a communist.’”

Hmmm…, well, that’s interesting.

“Although Sanders has refrained from self-identifying as a communist, his ties with far-left Marxist groups go back decades.”

Hmmm…, well, that’s interesting as well.

aelect 5

“The Washington Examiner reported last May on his ties with far-left political parties such as the Socialist Workers Party [SWP]. During his time as mayor of Burlington, Vermont, he littered his office with newspapers and pamphlets from revolutionary organizations.”

The Socialist Workers Party (SWP) is known as the communist party in the United States.

“In 1980 and 1984, Sanders endorsed SWP presidential candidates Andrew Pulley and Mel Mason. Their presidential platforms included promises to dismantle the entire U.S. military and nationalize most industries.”

Hmmm…, wouldn’t these be things Russia would be excited about getting behind as opposed to President Trump’s accomplishments and policies?

“Sanders was later investigated by the FBI concerning his ties to the SWP, although charges were never brought.”

aelect 20

As we know, charges are never brought against liberals, democrats, socialists and communists…, only conservatives.

And on a final note, according to Michael Kranish of The Washington Post, “The just-married socialist mayor from Vermont was on what he called “a very strange honeymoon,” an official 10-day [in 1988] visit to the communist country [Russia], and he was enthralled with the hospitality and the lessons that could be brought home.”

Just “enthralled!”

“The trip garnered brief mention in the 2016 presidential campaign, but earlier this year, a video from a Vermont community television station was posted online that showed a few minutes of Sanders’s unlikely celebration with the Soviets.”

“As he stood on Soviet soil, Sanders, then 46 years old, criticized the cost of housing and health care in the United States, while lauding the lower prices — but not the quality — of that available in the Soviet Union. Then, at a banquet attended by about 100 people, Sanders blasted the way the United States had intervened in other countries.”

“Sanders declined to be interviewed for this report.”

You don’t say?

I’m sure the fake news media will eventually make a Russia-Bernie connection in an effort to railroad Bernie out of their nomination process as well.

The liberal establishment is so predictably pathetic it’s laughable.

So, they’re going to be telling us the Russians are supporting both Bernie AND President Trump?

Like I said…, laughable and unbelievably shameless.

WINNING!

aelect 13

aelect 15

aelect 16

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Wooo! Was I watching “WrestleMania,” WWE Wednesday Night “SmackDown,” or the democrat debate?!

adebate 1

adebate 5a

adebate 6

Like WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment) superstar “Road Dogg” Jesse James says, “Oh, you didn’t know? You’re a$$ better call somebodyyyyy!”

And the democrats who should’ve “called somebody” were Michael Bloomberg and Amy Klobuchar.

adebate 10

Bloomberg should have called 911 and Klobuchar should have taken a page from “Who wants to be a Millionaire” and “asked the audience” or “phoned a friend!”

adebate 8

According to Mary Anne Marsh [Mary Anne Marsh is a Democrat political analyst and a principal at Dewey Square Group in Boston where she provides strategic counsel for Fortune 100 companies, non-profits and political campaigns.] for Fox News, “In fierce Democratic presidential debate, 1 winner and 5 losers.”

Ms. Marsh’s bio indicates that she is an extremely biased liberal, and I would argue the democrats had no winners in this debate.  The only real winner here was President Trump!

adebate 7

I felt her overall take on the debate, however, was pretty accurate.

“Multibillionaire Michael Bloomberg landed in Las Vegas like a highly anticipated show on the Strip. But when he took to the stage with five competitors for the Democratic presidential nomination Wednesday night, their debate immediately became an Ultimate Fighting Championship [UFC] match.”

“Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., landed the most blows and won the night [This is debatable. I would say she wasn’t really attacked by anyone because none of them feel she is someone to worry about anymore!]. Warren would not be ignored or denied [This means the debate moderators failed to stop her from being a blabber mouth and time hog.] Warren flattened Bloomberg out of the gate using his own words against the former New York City mayor and he never recovered. As a result, voters got to see the real Warren, who was the front-runner last fall. And they saw the real Bloomberg, not the filtered one seen on paid TV ads and in social media.”

Have you realized yet that Ms. Marsh is an Elizabeth Warren fan?

“Warren’s strong performance helped her at a time when she needs it most and hurt Bloomberg so badly that he may not recover.”

This I agree with.  The whole world saw that Michael “The Emperor” Bloomberg has no clothes!  He was unmasked as a fraud, a hack, and not ready for prime time.

In Marsh’s opinion, “There was one winner [Warren] and five losers at the end of the debate – Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont; former Vice President Joe Biden; Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota; former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg; and Bloomberg, who turned out to be the biggest loser of all.”

“With Bloomberg standing to her right Warren landed a left to the jaw with a shattering exchange using his own words about women against him. She then used his nondisclosure agreements, the stop-and-frisk tactic employed by police primarily against minorities when he was mayor, and his vast fortune estimated at more than $60 billion against him too.”

“Bloomberg’s performance was a disaster. He was not the Bloomberg of his ads in this debate – and that’s now a big problem for him.”

“Warren exposed the real Michael Bloomberg and it was not a pretty picture.”

“It was Warren’s relentless challenge to Bloomberg on a host of issues – including his treatment of women who worked for him and his refusal to release them from nondisclosure agreements – as well as his treatment of people of color with his stop-and-frisk policy.”

“Bloomberg’s attempts to apologize and explain only made the situation worse. His apology came off as more about convenience than sincerity – and that will register with voters too.”

“Finally, Bloomberg also sounded a lot like President Trump when asked about releasing his tax returns, raising issues about his lack of transparency.”

“Sanders, the self-described democratic socialist who represents Vermont was repeatedly questioned about his lack of transparency regarding his medical records, his recent heart attack and the cost of his “Medicare-for-all” plan.”

Mayor Pete “Buttigieg is the leader in delegates at this early stage from his strong finish in Iowa and New Hampshire. He used the debate to land a few blows on Sanders, with whom he’s locked in a delegate fight.”

“The former mayor also hit Klobuchar, who he is competing with for moderate voters…,” and they “… had a number of exchanges in their fight for moderate voters.”

I particularly liked when Mayor Pete referred to Klobuchar’s previous inability to name the president of Mexico, even though she is on trade and immigration committees in the Senate.

Her response was, “Are you mocking me?” and “Are you calling me dumb?” Obviously attempting put Mayor Pete on the defensive while trying to gain some sympathy for herself.

I would say, “If the shoe fits, wear it, Amy!”

Bam!

adebate 2

Former Vice-President “Biden did nothing to help himself. He looked like a tourist in Las Vegas rather than someone who should own the stage.”

Ha!

“Biden did little if anything to reassure voters he’s the best one to take on Trump or stem his slide in the polls. And that’s more bad news for Biden in this race.”

Bloomberg did manage to land a blow on Bernie, however, when he said, “Sanders, the best known socialist over here, happens to be a millionaire with three houses.”

Boom!

adebate 3

The truth hurts, right, Bernie?

The truth hurts in general for all of these democrat candidates.

And that’s the truth!

Wham!

adebate 4

I’m actually looking forward to the next democrat debate.

I’m sure Mini-Mike Bloomberg can’t say the same!

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

More “Swampy” Nursery Rhymes!

The Second Edition of MrEricksonRules’ “Swampy” Nursery Rhymes!

arhymes 8

I know you’ve all been waiting patiently for this.

Well, here it is!

This much anticipated second edition of my “Swampy” nursery rhymes pays tribute to the sad democrat presidential candidates still in the race.

arhymes 2

A farewell to Elizabeth Warren, aka “Pocahontas,” aka “the bag lady,” ala “There was an old woman who lived in a shoe.”

 

There was an old bag lady who thought she was cool,

She had so many supporters she started to drool;

Thoughts of becoming the president they grew in her head,

But her lying and stupidness quickly put that to bed.

 

arhymes 3

A Rhyme for “Crazy” Bernie, read to “It’s raining; it’s pouring.”

 

Bernie’s whining and roaring.

The OLD man is boring.

He may be the frontrunner after primary two,

But be prepared, Bernie, cuz they’re gonna screw you!

 

arhymes 5

A Tribute to another OLD friend, “Sleepy” Joe Biden, sung to “Hush, little baby don’t say a word.”

 

Hush, Creepy Joe-oe don’t Say a Word,

Cuz every time I hear you you sound like a turd.

 

And if your statements don’t make sense,

They’ll be ignored or blamed on Pence.

 

And if Barack won’t endorse your race,

Then that’s a real slap in your face.

 

And if you can’t actually win a state,

Then dropping out may be your fate.

 

And if your campaign just isn’t meant to be,

It’s not like a big surprise to me.

 

Barack said, “You don’t have to do this, Joe,”

You should have listened and just stayed home.

 

arhymes 1

Another ode to “Sleepy” Joe, sung to “Oh where, oh where has my little dog gone.”

 

Oh where, oh where has Sleepy Joe gone?

Oh where, oh where can he be?

With two 5th place finishes to start the race,

Oh where, oh where can he be?

 

Oh where, oh where has Sleepy Joe gone?

Oh where, oh where can he be?

He still thinks that he’s leading the pack, but,

Oh where, oh where can he be?

 

arhymes 4

My rendition of “Lazy Mary will you get up?” for Amy Klobuchar.

 

Lamey Amy, won’t you give up,

Won’t you give up, won’t you give up?

Lamey Amy, won’t you give up,

So early in the run-ning?

 

No, dear socialists, I won’t give up,

I won’t give up, I won’t give up.

No, dear socialists I won’t give up,

So early in the run-ning.

 

arhymes 7

And we can’t forget Mayor Pete!  Read to “Little Bo Peep.”

 

Ex-Mayor Pete has lost the blacks

And doesn’t know where to find them.

If he leaves them alone

They’ll never come home

And he won’t any more elections.

 

Ex-Mayor Pete, he searched for the blacks

But didn’t quite know how to find them.

He looked everywhere

From here and to there

But still couldn’t get them to vote for him.

 

Ex-Mayor Pete began to weep

And lay down to rest for a while

He fell fast asleep

While counting is black sheep

Then dreamt they came home with a smile.

 

I hope you enjoyed this second edition of MrEricksonRules’ “Swampy” Nursey Rhymes!

Stay tuned for my third edition in the near future.  I’m working on more good ones already!

WINNING!

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

What a motley crew (or “Libs Gone Wild!”): The 2020 Democrat presidential candidates!

Seriously?

This is the best group of candidates the democrats could come up with?

demcans 13

None of the current candidates conjure up any vision of them being “presidential,” with possible exception of Joe Biden.

I Predicted Hillary would run again in my blog, “I’m letting everyone know, again, that Hillary is going to run for President, again, in 2020.” from March 15, 2018, and that prediction is looking good, at least as a vice presidential candidate.

Anyway…, let’s take a look at the current crop of esteemed democrat presidential candidates, along with my official candidate classifications!

“On Life Support:” Kamala Harris and Corey Booker.  They seem to get quite a bit of media coverage, although they have been polling at 5% or less.  I believe the fact that they’re Black keeps them from falling into the next category.

“The Walking Dead:” Andrew Yang, Amy Klobuchar, Tulsi Gabbard, Julian Castro and Beto O’Rourke.  This group consistently polls less than 5%.  Beto and Julian are typically at 1% or less, yet I feel like Beto gets quite a bit of airtime.  Why would anyone care about what he says one way of the other?  Just sayin’.

Then we come to “The Cream of the Crappy Crop:” Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg.  These four typically poll with at least 13%, with Biden and Warren usually over 20%.

If Hillary doesn’t jump back into the race, or somebody else doesn’t jump into the race, one of these four will be the democrat presidential candidate for the 2020 presidential election.

Bwahahahahahahaha!

I’m sorry…, let’s get back to looking at the top 4 democrat presidential candidates.

Drumroll please…:

Number four…, Mayor Pete Buttigieg.  Of the top four, Mayor Pete is probably the most reasonable, policy-wise.  But is a small town mayor really ready to run our country?  Are we really ready for our “first lady” to be a man?  I don’t think so.

demcans 12

demcans 9

demcans 10

demcans 11

Number three…, Senator Bernie Sanders.  “Crazy” Bernie identifies as an “Independent” in The Senate, but he’s running for president as a democrat.  We knew he was a democrat all along.  Why was he misrepresenting himself the whole time?  He was obviously being disingenuous.  He seems like he’s a thousand years old, and he is not afraid to admit he’s a socialist at heart.  Your time has passed Bern.

demcans 2

Number two (or 1B)…, Senator Elizabeth Warren. When I see her, she reminds me of a “bag lady” who is wearing her best clothes and left her cart(s) outside. Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren is carrying around a lot of racial baggage, along with a lot of cultural hijacking for reasons of personal gain.  She is a woman, but will that be enough for women to hold their noses and actually vote for her?  In the end, they may not have any other choice.  She may be the democrat candidate by default.

demcans 3

demcans 4

demcans 14

Then we have number one (or 1A)…, former Senator and former Vice President Joe Biden…, another poster child for term limits and an “establishment” tool. “Sleepy, creepy, Uncle” Joe Biden is another guy who’s time has really passed.  His only claim to fame is that he was Barack Obama’s vice president, but former President Obama won’t even endorse him!  Plus Vice President Biden actually DID the things the democrats are trying to impeach President Trump for.  He may also end-up being the democrat candidate by default.

demcans 7

demcans 6

demcans 8

Whoever is left standing, you can be sure they’ll have the complete and undivided support of the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media,” along with George Soros and all of the other wealthy “America haters.”

FOUR MORE YEARS!  FOUR MORE YEARS!

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

What the heck has happened to Venezuela?!  I’ll break it down for you.

Let’s look at a basic and condensed timeline, pertaining to Venezuela, for starters:

1992 – Venezuela becomes the 3rd richest country in the western hemisphere, behind only the United States and Canada.

1993 – President Carlos Andrés Pérez is impeached for embezzlement of public funds.

1998 – A collapse in confidence in the existing parties saw the election of former coup-involved career officer Hugo Chávez and the launch of the Bolivarian Revolution and socialism. The “Bolivarian Revolution” refers to a left-wing populist social movement and political process in Venezuela led by the late Venezuelan president, Hugo Chávez, who founded the Fifth Republic Movement in 1997 and the United Socialist Party of Venezuela in 2007.

1999 – The “revolution” began when a “new” Constitution for Venezuela was written.

2001 – Venezuela voted for a socialist president to address “income inequality.”

venezuela 8

2004 – Private healthcare is completely socialized.

2007 – All higher education becomes “free.”

2009 – The private ownership of guns is banned.

2012 – Bernie Sanders is quoted as saying, “Venezuelans are living the American dream better than Americans.”

venezuela 6

2014 – Government opposition leaders are imprisoned.

2016 – Food shortages become a widespread problem.

venezuela 13

2017 – The Venezuelan constitution and elections are suspended.

2018 – The country’s economic policies lead to extreme hyperinflation, with an inflation rate of 1,370,000% by the end of the year.

2019 – It is estimated that more than 3 million people have fled Venezuela in recent years.

2019 – Venezuelan protesters are attacked and killed by their own government in order to suppress their dissidence.

 

Venezuela’s socialist governments have been in power since 1999, taking over the country at a time when Venezuela had huge inequality.

But the socialist polices brought in which aimed to help the poor backfired, and made the situation even worse, of course.  Companies now controlled by the government failed, and price controls to make basic goods more affordable to the poor by capping prices meant that Venezuelan businesses no longer found it profitable to produce them.  Eventually, the government subsidies of all facets of the economy were unsustainable.

In only 27 years Venezuela has turned a “rags to riches” story into a “riches to rags” story.

venezuela 5

Like Margaret Thatcher, the former Britsh Prime Minister once said, “The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”

Does any of the Venezuela story sound familiar today in America?

There certainly appear to be some similarities in the early stages happening here.

venezuela 2

We see an impeachment happy democrat Congress trying to overturn a presidential election.

We see many democrat politicians and democrat presidential candidates calling for a new constitution or drastic changes to our existing one.

venezuela 10

We constantly hear democrat politicians and democrat presidential candidates touting government solutions for “income inequality,” don’t we?

venezuela 9

We hear democrat politicians and democrat presidential candidates calling for a complete government takeover of our healthcare system.

Many democrat politicians and democrat presidential candidates are proposing “free” college.

And lastly, we hear many democrat politicians and democrat presidential candidates calling for radical changes to our gun laws, changes to the 2nd amendment or the complete removal of our right to bear arms.

The intentions of the American democrat party are apparent.

The democrats want to destroy America as we know it.

venezuela 3

The choice here is painfully clear.

If you want to follow in Venezuela’s footsteps…, elect democrats.

It’s as simple as that.

The only people who benefit from a socialist government are those in government.

venezuela 7

They apparently long for power that badly that they are willing to turn everyone elses life into a living hell for their own sakes.

They can only do this if we let them, however.

Remember…, the Venezuelan people voted for what they got.

In the end…, it’s their own fault.

And in the end…, we’ll choose our own fate as well.

venezuela 12

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

“Should a White Man Be the Face of the Democratic Party in 2020?” – A recent headline in The New York Times.

The democrat party and liberals in general continually like to label conservatives, and President Trump specifically, as racists (anti-people of color), misogynists (anti-women), along with having phobias concerning any other type of personal delineation you can name.

It must be a heavy burden, maintaining this “enlightedness” on a daily basis.

whitemales 6

But we all have our crosses to bear.

I would argue that the liberal “enlightedness” of 2019 and 2020 is racist (anti-white) and misandrous (anti-men).

Approximately 70% of the U.S. population is “white,” which equates to roughly 225 million people, with males specifically accounting for about 110 million of those.

On the surface, that would not seem to be a very wise position for the democrats to be coming from.

But being wise, fair, and tolerant is not their current M.O. (“modus operandi,” or “method of operating”).

Why does everything have to be viewed through the spectrum of race, gender, culture and sexual orientation with the left?

Shouldn’t their goal be to just nominate the best person “to be the face of the democrat party in 2020,” regardless of race, gender, culture and sexual orientation?

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said, “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”

I think Dr. King would be disappointed that democrats and liberals were the ones standing in the way of that dream.

The comical thing, however, is that even with all of this “anti-white male” talk flying around the democrat party, their leading candidates right now are all white males!

Remember, however, in liberal land, what you say is more important than what you actually do.

whitemales 1

The top four I am referring to are: “Creepy Uncle” Joe Biden, “Crazy” Bernie Sanders, Beto “O’Dork” O’Rourke and Pete “Booty-gag” Buttigieg.

Candidates of a more “preferred” race and/or gender are Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar, Kirsten Gillebrand, Amy Klobuchar and Cory Booker, although they currently trail the four “white devils” by a significant amount in the polls.

whitemales 2

One of these “preferred” candidates will undoubtedly be chosen as the vice-presidential candidate to balance out the regrettable white male presidential candidate.

Howard Kurtz for Fox News adds, “… isn’t it also a discriminatory impulse to say perhaps a white male candidate should be denied the nomination on the grounds of race and sex?  Doesn’t that go against what we’ve always heard about wanting a color-blind and gender-neutral society?”

whitemales 4

The New York Times article piece says that “Democrats have seen the strong diversity in their field … become somewhat overshadowed by white male candidates.”  The article then asks, “What’s the bigger gamble: to nominate a white man and risk disappointing some of the party’s base, or nominate a minority candidate or a woman who might struggle to carry predominantly white swing states like Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania that both Barack Obama and President Trump won?”

Hmmm…, so Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania are considered “white swing states” by the liberals?  Interesting.  So even entire states have a racial determination in their eyes.

whitemales 7

Believe me my democrat friends…, there is no “gamble” for you no matter who you nominate.  Who else are the great confused liberal masses going to vote for?

President Trump!?

And those “unicorn” voters who identify as “independents” are even more confused than the confused liberal masses.

If any of these “independents” had an IQ higher than that of a jackass, the difference between President Trump and any of these democrat candidates should be readily apparent.  How anyone could be “undecided” going into the 2020 presidential election is beyond me.

whitemales 3

There is going to be well over a billion dollars spent on this election, trying to persuade about 1,000 “independent” idiots.

Everyone else is spoken for.

That’s about $1 million a vote by the way…, and they’ll probably end up voting for the Green Party candidate anyway!  Or not bother to vote at all because they still couldn’t make up their mind!

It’s a mad, mad, mad world.

whitemales 5

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑