Iryna Zarutska was Sentenced to Death by Our “Justice System.”

Yes, Iryna Zarutska was sentenced to death by our so-called “Justice System,” but it could have been anybody, just sitting there, minding their own business on that train, or on a bus, or eating at a restaurant, or walking down the street, or…, well, you get the picture.

This piece of human garbage had no business being out and about amongst the innocent people of this community, just trying to live their lives, with the most modest expectations of the ability to do so.

I’ve written about this type of injustice before, and it’s sad we have to deal with this again, and again, and again, and again…

Like I said, I’ve written about these types of injustices before.

Many other articles will be written about this, but most won’t address the real problem.

The real problem is democrats. Democrats and their policies.

Their evil policies.

This is an attack of evil people on good and innocent people.

Let’s just be clear that it’s basically a battle of good versus evil. 

Regarding this specific case, Sneha Kumari for India Times News writes a good article and asks the right questions:

“Who is Decarlos Brown Jr.? 14 arrests, mental illness and a violent past—why was he free before killing Iryna Zarutska?”

“Decarlos Brown Jr., a 34-year-old with a long history of violent crimes and diagnosed schizophrenia, was arrested for the fatal stabbing of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska. Despite 14 prior arrests and alarming behavior, he remained free due to systemic failures, raising serious concerns about public safety and mental health oversight.”

And please be aware that records show there are over 800 other individuals walking around free in the Charlotte area that have more prior arrests (20, 30, 40, and even 50 and more) than DeCarlos Brown.

It’s scary, and this situation is only multiplied hundreds and hundreds of times in communities across the country.

“The brutal killing of Iryna Zarutska has sent shockwaves through the Charlotte community and beyond, raising urgent questions about public safety and the protection of vulnerable individuals seeking refuge. Just 23 years old, Zarutska had escaped the horrors of war in Ukraine in search of peace and security in the United States. Instead, her life was tragically cut short in a horrifying act of violence aboard a Charlotte light rail train, where she was fatally stabbed. Following this, shocking new video footage has surfaced on the internet, revealing the terrifying moments before and after the attack. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police have arrested Decarlos Brown Jr, a known career criminal, in connection with the murder, but who is he, and why was he released after being in jail 14 times?”

“According to the surveillance footage, after Zarutska clutched her throat and collapsed into her seat, Decarlos Brown Jr. calmly walked through the train car, removed his sweatshirt, and stood near the doors. Other passengers began to take notice as blood was seen dripping from him, slowly realizing the severity of what had just occurred.”

“According to officials, Brown exited at the next stop, where a knife was later recovered. However, the disturbing visuals have sparked public outrage and renewed calls for stronger safety measures on public transportation systems.”

“Decarlos Brown Jr., is currently a homeless man who has a lengthy criminal history that includes charges such as larceny, armed robbery, and making threats, as per WSOC-TV. He previously served a five-year prison sentence for armed robbery. Earlier this year, in January, Brown was arrested again after allegedly misusing the 911 emergency system during a welfare check.”

“Despite a long and violent criminal record, 34-year-old Decarlos Brown Jr. was repeatedly released back into the community. As reported by the New York Post, Brown assaulted his own sister just months after being released from prison.”

“Court records reveal a disturbing pattern, showing that Brown has spent much of his adult life in and out of jail since 2011. His extensive rap sheet includes serious charges such as felony larceny, robbery with a dangerous weapon, and making criminal threats, raising serious concerns about how someone with such a history remained free despite the escalating severity of his offences.”

Ali Abbas Ahmadi, for BBC News, reports that, “The suspect’s mother, who didn’t want to be identified, told local news outlet WSOC-TV that she believes the attack could have been prevented.”

She understood her son was not well and should not have been released.

“North Carolina Representative Brenden Jones, a Republican, wrote on X that Ms Zarutska’s death ‘is the result of decades of Democrat DAs and Sheriffs putting their woke agendas above public safety. Violent criminals commit crimes with impunity, while families live in fear.’”

“Republican Florida Congressman Randy Fine said he would ‘introduce legislation to hold judges accountable when violent repeat offenders they release commit new crimes.’”

”’Those 12+ judges that released Decarlos Brown Jr should have their day in court too,’ he added.”

Yes, they should be held responsible for their actions.

And, in addition, it is very simple: dangerous individuals need to be locked away to protect the rest of us.

I’m not concerned about their rights or rehabilitation.

I’m concerned about their current and future victims.  

People say crime is not a political issue, but, I’m sorry, it is.

The simple truth is that democrats have a lot of blood on their hands.

If you’re a democrat, you have blood on your hands.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Democrats proclaim, “Black Lives Matter!” Really?

Seriously?

Really?

Most recently, Illinois Governor J. B. Pritzker, and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, have been fighting to keep federal crime assistance, offered by President Trump, out of Chicago.

These “concerned” politicians prefer the status quo, which was 58 people shot and 8 killed over the Labor Day weekend, and dozens shot and killed over any other normal weekend, not to mention those shot and killed during the week!

Black communities bear the brunt of these shootings and killings.

But Pritzker and Johnson say crime statistics are improving, and they don’t want, or need help.

What do you think the families and friends of the hundreds of people who have been shot, and the families and friends of the hundreds of people in Chicago would have to say about that?

Pritzker and Johnson call on their democrat friends to “stand up and fight” against “federal occupation,” and to “defend the land” against President Trump.

Really?

Again, these “concerned” politicians prefer 58 people shot and 8 killed over the Labor Day weekend, and dozens shot and killed over any other normal weekend, not to mention those shot and killed during the week, and expect the people of Chicago to follow suit?

Since when did sacrificing the lives of these people to criminals on a daily basis become acceptable, and become the norm?

I believe the sane residents of Chicago would beg to differ.

So, do these democrat politicians still believe black lives matter?

I would ask, “matter” in what way exactly, because these black lives don’t seem to be worth saving in their eyes.

In case you don’t believe my premise of black lives being effected the most by this senseless crime in Chicago, in an article from April 12, 2022, for The Heritage Foundation, Giancarlo Canaparo and Abby Kassal ask, “Who Suffers the Most from the Crime Wave?”

“African Americans bear an increasingly large share of the harm from crime.”

“The spike in crime is hurting a lot of people, and black communities bear the heaviest burden.”

“Violent crime, like the price of gas, is rising. Not everyone is experiencing this crime wave in the same way. For some, it’s a distant issue experienced by other people somewhere else. For others, it’s a daily life-threatening concern.”

“We parsed the FBI’s crime data from 2011 to 2020 (the most recent data available) and found that African Americans bear an increasingly large share of the harm from crime. African American offenders, meanwhile, are committing an increasingly large share of violent crimes.”

“For other racial groups, the numbers are either decreasing (in the case of both white victims and offenders), increasing by much smaller amounts, or holding constant.”

“According to federal crime data, the number of violent crimes has increased by almost 50% over the last 10 years. In 2011, the FBI reported 314,907 violent offenses. In 2020, there were 640,836.”

“The most striking figure in the data is the spike in reported homicides, which tripled from 3,549 offenses in 2011 to 10,440 offenses in 2020.”

“The picture that federal crime data provide is bad, but the reality of crime in the United States is even worse. The FBI’s data is not complete. It relies on local law enforcement agencies across the country to voluntarily share their local data with the FBI. Not all do.”

Or, the data is manipulated, ala Washington D.C., to make it seem better than it really is.  

“Although the National Incident-Based Reporting System is not complete, it provides useful insights into who suffers from and who commits crime because it tracks demographic data about both sets of people.”

“We utilized the FBI’s crime data to compare victim statistics to determine which groups have been most impacted by the rise in violent crime. Factoring out the cases in which the race of the victim was unknown, we calculated who has borne the brunt of the crime wave.”

“For this analysis, violent crime includes assault, homicide, and sex offenses. We found that the increase in these crimes has fallen hardest on black people.”

“The most significant changes, therefore, were that black people represent an increasing share of violent crime victims…”

“The true size of the problem is made starker when we consider that African Americans make up only 14.2% of the total population (including multiracial populations who identify as black “in combination” with another race), but 32.7% of all violent crime victims and 54.4% of homicide victims. Thus, these small percentages represent an enormous problem that, for black people, is getting worse, both in relative and absolute terms.”

Regardless…, the spike in crime is hurting a lot of people, and black communities bear the heaviest burden.

Democrats across the country oppose President Trump’s desire to make our cities safer places to live and work. The democrats prefer to fight for the rights criminals and ignore the devastating impact crime is having on their constituents.

How these democrats keep winning elections in our big cities is beyond me.

I guess, in the end, you get what you deserve, but President Trump is determined to improve the lives of the people in these big democrat run cities, whether they appreciate it or not.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

The Swamp was Swilling Taxpayer Money like Pigs at the Trough!

Yes, my friends. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has revealed a virtual unending amount of waste and abuse of our taxpayer dollars by these swamp monsters and their anti-America socialist piglets everywhere.

To the tune of billions and billions and billions of our taxpayer dollars.

In the simplest of terms, innumerable (mostly democrat) parasites have been stealing our money.

When I hear the DOGE team describe just some of their findings it literally makes me sick.

Imagine, if you will, thousands and thousands of “wolves of Wall Street” partying on our dime like it was 1999.

They had absolutely no respect for the people they were supposed to be working for, or any sense of accountability for the money they had no problem squandering away. 

It’s no wonder the democrats are all up in arms over President Trump, Elon Musk, and the DOGE team.

These people are like crack addicts who have been forced to go cold turkey, with the added worry of possibly being held legally accountable for their years, even decades, of theft and abuse.

This explains why they’re willing to fund as many protests as it takes, while expending political capital left and right, regardless of popular opinion.

Congressman Craig Goldman, of Texas, posted the following on his website:

“Alongside President Donald Trump, I am committed to eliminating wasteful and fraudulent federal government spending. With over $36 trillion in national debt, reckless government overspending must end. I have put together a non-exhaustive list of taxpayer dollars spent under the Biden administration. This list has been identified through the incredible work of the White House, executive agencies, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and my colleagues in the U.S. Congress. I will be updating this tracker regularly to show how taxpayer dollars were poorly spent.”

“The list below includes taxpayer dollars channeled through agencies such as the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), U.S. Department of State (DOS), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Inter-American Foundation (IAF), National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. African Development Foundation (USADF), and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).”

The following is just a list of DOGE’s initial findings.

“$22,600,000,000 (HHS) – Aiding illegal migrants through resettlement programs, home and car purchases, and loans

$7,500,000,000 (DOT) – Funding a few dozen electric vehicle stations across the nation

$7,000,000,000 (EPA) – Funding green energy projects that reduce greenhouse gases and promoting the adoption of green alternatives nationwide

$5,000,000,000 (EPA) – Funding green energy projects that reduce gas emissions and supporting green banks

$2,000,000,000 (EPA) – Funding projects to decarbonize American housing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

$382,000,000 (DOL) – Issuing fraudulent unemployment payments to tens of thousands of individuals, including those with birthdates in the future, infants, and people listed as 115 years old

$312,000,000 (SBA) – Providing business loans for children 11 years old and under

$59,000,000 (FEMA) – Supplying services and housing for illegal immigrants in New York City

$46,500,000 (DOS) – Funding projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil

$43,300,000 (USAID) – Supporting programs to build an inclusive and capable workforce, with a special emphasis on public health and climate change sectors in Egypt

$35,900,000 (USAID) – Funding positive youth experience in Gaza

$31,000,000 (USAID) – Supporting the transition to clean energy with energy supplies in Europe and Eurasia

$26,300,000 (USAID) – Supporting higher education in Egypt

$24,000,000 (USAID) – Promoting “resilient livelihoods” in Gaza

$17,500,000 (USAID) – Supporting male circumcision and condom programs

$17,300,000 (USAID) – Providing the Diversity and Inclusion Scholarship Program to students in Burma

$13,200,000 (USAID) – Supporting biodiversity programs in Liberia

$12,200,000 (DOL) – Promoting worker empowerment in South America

$11,000,000 (USAID) – Producing the Middle Eastern version of Sesame Street in Iraq

$10,300,000 (USAID) – Supporting male circumcision programs in Mozambique

$9,000,000 (USAID) – Stolen humanitarian aid by Al-Qaida-affiliated terrorists

$8,300,000 (USAID) – Building worker power for equity and justice

$8,300,000 (USAID) – Funding USAID education on equity and inclusion

$8,000,000 (EPA) – Funding an organization to address environmental and energy justice issues

$6,200,000 (NIH) – Studying the effects of asthma on transgender individuals in the U.S.

$6,000,000 (DOD) – Funding the University of Montana to “strengthen American democracy by bridging divides”

$6,000,000 (DOD) – Funding a grant to decarbonize emissions from Navy ships

$5,900,000 (NIH) – Funding for a TransHealthGUIDE for gender-diverse young adults

$5,700,000 (DOS) – Supporting programs for LGBTQ+ individuals in Latin America and the Caribbean

$5,200,000 (DOD) – Funding a grant to diversify the Navy

$5,100,000 (NIH) – Testing the effects of cross-sex hormone therapy on transgender individuals in the U.S.

$4,900,000 (USAID) – Funding youth programs with a focus on reproductive health and the intersection of youth and gender equity

$4,700,000 (DOL) – Promoting international labor standards in Ecuador

$4,000,000 (EPA) – Building a one-room museum inside the EPA

$3,500,000 (DOD) – Supporting DEI groups through the Defense Human Resources Activity

$3,300,000 (DOD) – Unionized health workers in the Department of Defense’s Defense Health Agency spent $3,300,000 and 87,000 hours doing union-related work instead of their federal jobs

$2,900,000 (NIH) – Studying HIV prevention for transgender women and their male partners

$2,500,000 (NIH) – Studying the impact of structural racism on the health of older gay men

$2,500,000 (USAID) – Supporting green energy businesses in Vietnam

$2,000,000 (USAID) – Supporting gender-affirming healthcare and LGBTQ+ advocacy in Guatemala

$1,900,000 (DOD) – Providing holistic diversity, equity, and inclusion transformation and training for the Air Force

$1,600,000 (NIH) – Testing the reproductive health of transgender individuals in the U.S.

$1,600,000 (DOD) – Funding a University of Florida study on the “social and institutional detriments of vulnerability and resilience to climate hazards in [the] African Sahel.”

$1,500,000 (USAID) – Promoting DEI business policies and LGBTQ+ entrepreneurship in Serbia

$1,200,000 (USAID) – Funding choice, equity, and sustainability programs

$910,000 (NIH) – Testing the effects of “gender-affirming” hormone therapy on the immune system in the U.S.

$900,000 (IAF) – Supporting alpaca farming in Peru

$755,000 (NIH) – Testing the effects of “gender-affirming” hormone therapy on bone development in the U.S.

$731,000 (IAF) – Improving the commercial viability of mushroom and pea farming in Guatemala

$677,000 (IAF) – Promoting fruit and jam sales in Honduras

$600,000 (USDA) – Supporting a study on the menstrual cycles in transgender men

$599,000 (NIH) – Testing the risk of breast cancer for transgender men in the U.S.

$483,000 (IAF) – Supporting the production of artisanal salt in Ecuador

$400,000 (DOS) – Supporting LGBTQ+ sensitivity trainings for police forces in Nigeria

$374,000 (USDA) – Hiring a DEI onboarding specialist at the USDA

$325,000 (HHS) – Adapting LGB+ teen pregnancy prevention program for transgender boys

$323,000 (IAF) – Promoting cultural support for Venezuelan migrants in Brazil

$300,000 (DOS) – Promoting acceptance for LGBTQ+ people in Botswana

$298,000 (USDA) – Promoting international development for underrepresented communities

$246,000 (USADF) _ Funding mango drying facilities in the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire

$239,000 (USADF) – Promoting pineapple juice in Benin

$229,000 (USDA) – Hiring a Brazilian forest and gender consultant at the USDA

$229,000 (USADF) – Funding the promotion of 100% organic shea butter in Burkina Faso

$209,000 (DOS) – Funding an international study trip on LGBTQ+ advocacy

$185,000 (DOS) – Promoting the empowerment of lesbian and bisexual women in Belize

$99,500 (USADF) – Supporting increased production of yogurt in Uganda

$84,000 (USADF) – Supporting a business incubator for spa and wellness entrepreneurs in Nigeria

$70,000 (DOS) – Producing a DEI music event in Ireland

$68,000 (DOS) – Funding dance class workshops in China

$32,000 (DOS) – Creating an LGBTQ+ comic book in Peru

$29,000 (USDA) – Hiring a Central American gender assessment consultant at the USDA

$25,000 (DOS) – Funding a transgender opera in Colombia”

A stunning list, isn’t it?

And please understand that most of the money listed here never made it to the idiotic funding listed, but was either rerouted or kicked back to a long list of corrupt swamp monsters.

Nor does this even include the immense fraud uncovered at the IRS, Medicare, and Medicaid.

Thank God for President Trump.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

“Vote for the democrats, because the democrats vote for us!”

I’ve recently seen these words on signs posted here and there.

My question is, who exactly is this “US” this person is referring to?”

If “US” refers to illegal immigrants, I would agree.

If “US” refers to the Chinese Communist Party, I would agree.

If “US” refers to the Mexican drug cartels, I would agree.

If “US” refers to the people on Jeffrey Epstein’s client list, and pedophiles everywhere, I would agree.

If “US” refers to all of these trans drag queens, who feel obligated to put on their disgusting shows in front of children, I would agree.

If “US” refers to the parents who feel it is okay to expose their children to all of these trans drag queens, who feel obligated to put on their disgusting shows for children, I would agree.

If “US” refers to those who feel it’s okay to eliminate Israel, and all Jewish people in general, I would agree.

If “US” refers to those who want to “buddy up” to Iran, and subsidize terrorism around the world, I would agree.

If “US” refers to those who prefer to subsidize despots around the globe by getting our oil from them, as opposed to supplying our own oil here at home, I would agree.

If “US” refers to those who feel it is preferable to keep letting serial criminals off time and time again, without holding them accountable for their actions, I would agree.

If “US” refers to those who feel it is appropriate to transfer the debt of college students onto the backs of other hard working Americans, I would agree.

If “US” refers to individuals who believe it is okay to weaponize the “justice” department against those who may have different political views from the party in power, I would agree.

If “US” refers to those who make the killing of innocent unborn babies their top priority, and are willing to overlook all of these other sins in order to maintain this ability, I would agree.

If “US” refers to people who believe it is okay for biological males to complete in women’ sports and infringe upon women’s restrooms and locker rooms, I would agree.

If “US” refers to people who don’t mind paying 20%, 30%, 40%, 50% more for food, gas, rent, utilities, or mortgages, I would agree.

I’m sure “US” could apply to many other undesirable ideals and individuals as well. Please add to the list via a comment if you feel I’ve left some group off.

We have a lot of confused and ignorant people in this country, as well as those who would intentionally promote the downfall of our country and our way of life.

We cannot let these democrats win.

If the democrats win, we all lose.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

If you’re a democrat, the question is why?

If any of you democrats out there would care to reply in a comment for all of us to read, that would be nice, but I’m not going to hold my breath waiting.

But again, if you’re a democrat, the honest question is why?

Is the right to kill babies, wherever and whenever you want, really that much of a priority for you?

Is the allowance of illegal, unvetted, immigrants coming into our country, by the millions and millions, not to mention the millions of illegals that are coming across our border that we have no idea of who they are, is such a good idea in your mind?

Is the virtually unchecked allowance of fentanyl and countless other harmful drugs that are killing people in our country every day acceptable to you?

Maybe it’s taking away women’s rights that had been fought for so long, and handing those rights over to transgender males that appeals to you.

Or could it be the weaponization of the FBI and the “justice” system against anyone who challenges the democrats’ narrative and control that pulls you towards the democrat party?

Or perhaps you are endeared with handing billions and billions of our tax dollars over to foreign countries that don’t even particularly like us?

Or could it be you support the hate being demonstrated against the Jewish people in our country, ala Nazi Germany, and calling for the death of all Israelis and the end of Israel? Is that it?

No, I know what it is! You prefer paying like 25% more for everything, while also paying for the student loans for America hating liberal punks, as well as footing the bill to support the millions and millions of illegal immigrants we now have in our country, thanks to Lyin’ Biden and the rest of the democrats.

Maybe you believe we should go back to the horse and buggy days, while coughing up trillions of dollars in a futile attempt to curtail a perceived climate change?

Or could it be you’re worried about the end of “democracy” if Donald Trump is elected? But you don’t see the current actions by the democrats that are putting an end to democracy in our country?

No, no, I know what it is. You are pleased with the “defund the police” policies, and the collection of do nothing liberal DAs, and all of the lawlessness that is being allowed to thrive in our country.

It may be you don’t feel like you’re paying enough taxes and you’d like to pay more.

Or could it be you think it’s a good idea for drag queens to perform for very young students, and for them to promote deviant sexual behavior to them? Who are the parents who sit there and watch this disgusting display, by the way? Are these the suburban women who support Lyin’ Biden that I hear about?

I know, you’re a closet pedophile and you support Biden’s and the democrats’ sex trafficking of children across the southern border. You do realize the Biden administration has “lost track” of over 80,000 children it has allowed into our country over the last three years, don’t you?

You have an uncontrollable desire to wear a mask 24/7?

Like I asked before, if you’re a democrat, the question is why?

If you really do consider yourself a democrat, aren’t you the least bit ashamed?

If you aren’t, you really should be.

Just sayin’.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Has anyone actually been charged with “insurrection” regarding January 6th?

The “insurrection” word gets thrown around ALL the time by democrats, but the truth is NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

Let me say that again.

NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

Although hundreds of Americans have been charged with various other crimes, regarding the events of January 6th, NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

Let me say that again.

NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

You may wonder how that could possibly be, and the answer is probably because it, in reality, was not an “insurrection,” at least by the protesters and rioters that have been targeted by The Department of inJustice.

Kaylee McGhee White, for The Washington Examiner writes, “Reminder: Not one person involved in Jan. 6 riot has been charged with ‘insurrection.’”

“For all the Democrats’ talk of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot being an ‘insurrection,’ it’s important to remember that not one person involved in the riot has been charged with that crime.”

“My colleague Jerry Dunleavy writes, ‘One year after the Capitol riot, no one has been charged with sedition or insurrection, despite initial Justice Department claims that such charges were likely and former President Donald Trump being impeached for allegedly inciting an insurrection.’”

“Surely, if the rioters’ actions were as seditious and Trump’s foolishness [their words, not mine] was as dangerous as Democrats have claimed, we’d be seeing criminal charges that reflect the seriousness of those alleged crimes. But that hasn’t happened.”

“According to the Justice Department, more than 225 defendants had been charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding law enforcement officers; at least 275 defendants have been charged with obstructing a congressional proceeding; and about 40 defendants have been charged with some sort of conspiracy charge.”

“But, again, no one has been charged with sedition or insurrection.”

Let me say that again.

NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

“Perhaps that’s why the vast majority of voters on both the Left and the Right don’t agree with Democrats’ characterization of the Capitol riot as an insurrection. A CBS News poll released this week found that 70% of the people who voted for President Joe Biden and 84% of the people who voted for Trump considered the Capitol riot to be a ‘protest that went too far.’”

Now we see multiple states attempting to keep President Trump off of this November’s ballot because he, according to their belief, “incited an insurrection” on January 6th.

The same January 6th where NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH, INCLUDING PRESIDENT TRUMP.  

In truth, President Trump offered to deploy 10,000 National Guard troops to the Capitol that day, but his offer was rejected by Pelosi, who as the Speaker of the House at the time, was in charge of Capitol security.

Now why would she do that?

The idea has been floated she denied troops to help with security because “it would not have been a good look.”

But the Capitol surrounded by fences and razor wire and troops after the fact was a good look?

In reality, I believe she did not want the troops there because they would have actually kept the protestors in line, which was contrary to what Pelosi, and her counterparts, the FBI, desired.  

It has been well documented that FBI operatives incited the protestors to march on and enter the Capitol building, and even assisted them with their entry.

All so Pelosi and the democrats could use this event to further their never ending parade of witch hunts against President Trump, and further promote their narrative of the evil MAGA contingency.  

And, why was Nancy Pelosi, who was responsible for Capitol security, never brought before the January 6th Committee to testify?   

I think we all know the answer to that question.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

“I may not always agree with AARP, but…”

Isn’t that an odd way for AARP to begin an ad for itself?

So, they acknowledge many seniors don’t agree with their liberal stance on many social issues, but they should just overlook that for the sake of their social security.

“Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!”

Just keep shoveling money at us and our liberal “friends,” and we’ll take care of the rest.   

In case you’re not familiar with them, AARP was formerly the American Association of Retired Persons, and is an interest group in the United States focusing on issues affecting those over the age of fifty. The organization, which is headquartered in Washington, D.C., said it had more than 38 million members as of 2018.

“Formerly?”

So, what exactly does it stand for now?

According to Bill McAllister, for The Washington Post, “AARP ALTERS NAME TO REFLECT REALITY.”

Ha! If they wanted to reflect reality they would have renamed themselves DEMSCAM!

“One of Washington’s most influential interest groups is changing its name.”

“The American Association of Retired Persons said yesterday it has decided it will be known by its acronym, AARP. When pronounced, the name rhymes with harp.”

That’s dumb.

“The reason for the change: Too many of the organization’s 38+ million members are still working, said spokeswoman Lisa Davis. The organization, which has been a major lobbying force on issues affecting senior citizens such as Social Security and Medicare, allows individuals as young as 50 to join its ranks.”

The more, the merrier, not to mention, the more, the more money.

It’s always about the money.

And with the democrats, it’s always about discrimination, as well. So, no one under 50 years of age is “allowed to join?”

How does that work?

It doesn’t even make sense.

Isn’t that age discrimination?

So, no one under 50 is interested in “protecting” social security and Medicare?

Just sayin’.   

According to the website “Ballotpedia,” “AARP is tax exempt, and defines itself as follows:”

“AARP is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, with a membership of more than 37 million, that helps people turn their goals and dreams into real possibilities, strengthens communities and fights for the issues that matter most to families such as healthcare, employment security and retirement planning. We advocate for consumers in the marketplace by selecting products and services of high quality and value to carry the AARP name as well as help our members obtain discounts on a wide range of products, travel, and services.”

Who could ask for more?!

Please note: Any group that has tens of millions of dollars at its disposal, as well as the ability to influence political issues with millions of people, and at the same time claims to be nonpartisan, is lying.

And, “tax exempt?” Please.

Did you ever noticed how most organizations which promote a liberal point of view have gained tax exempt status?

Anyway, I digress.

“In an editorial column in the Los Angeles Times, critic Dale Van Atta says. ‘AARP does unauthorized lobbying for its membership, and lobbies against the best interests of its membership. Van Atta says that by lobbying for the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act, AARP leaders betrayed the membership.’”

So, “One of Washington’s most influential interest groups” “betrayed the membership.”

Well, that’s only to be expected from just another disingenuous liberal organization.

What started out as a valuable proponent for senior citizens and retirees, has now been fully bastardized into a tool for the democrat party.    

“BusinessWeek magazine says that in the past questions have arisen about whether AARP’s commercial interests may conflict with those of its membership, and characterizes many of the funds and insurance policies that AARP markets as providing considerably less benefit than seniors could get on their own.”

Like I said, it’s all about the money, because the money buys them political influence.

Stephen Miller, for The Washington Post writes, “Here’s why I’ll never ever join the AARP.”

“Today I got another letter from AARP. The letters have been coming pretty much every week for 25 years [I’m sure we can all relate!]. But in the past two months they’ve changed. AARP used to ask me to join. Now the letters from the lobbying group for older Americans say that I have joined but I haven’t paid my bill.”

I can see many of our older senior citizens falling for this, which is exactly how it was intended, I’m sure.

DEMSCAM.

“The latest one has on the envelope in big red letters: ‘Immediate Attention Requested.’ It says, ‘Thank you for joining AARP.’ But two sentences later it adds: ‘If you’ll promptly return the enclosed invoice with your payment, we will reinstate your membership and you’ll once again be a member in good standing.’”

“So am I a new member or a lapsed member? Neither. I have never joined AARP. And never will.”

“AARP clearly hopes that one day I will come to my senses and realize that joining the group is a smart move. Why don’t I join? AARP has oodles of benefits, and it only costs 16 bucks for a year’s membership. You can save, the letter says, on prescriptions and health-care products through AARP’s convenient pharmacy service; you can save on hotels, motels, tours and cruises. You can save on groceries, restaurants, flowers, electronics, clothing, vision and hearing care, and more. AARP even has a Benefits Handbook.”

“But I don’t join because there’s one ‘benefit’ AARP offers that I dislike. ‘You benefit from AARP’s leadership in Washington as AARP fights to protect Social Security, Medicare and employment rights.’ Protect? AARP doesn’t protect Social Security and Medicare. It prevents any serious discussion of meaningfully reforming these programs, which are in great danger of becoming insolvent.”

AARP = DEMSCAM.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

U.S. Troops have recently been attacked how many times?!

The correct updated answer would be at least 42 times since Oct. 17, 2023!

42 times!!!

That comes out to between one or two attacks per day!

And what have we done about it?

I heard we finally blew up a few empty warehouses in Syria.

Ooooh! I’m sure Iran and their friends got that message.

And, that message would be that Illegitimate Joe and his friends are holding up their end of the bargain, and are continuing with their policy of Iranian appeasement, at the expense of any of our poor troops that may be in the Middle East.

Pathetic.

Disgraceful.  

Shameful.

Treasonous.  

According to Coutney Kube, for NBC News, “At least 45 U.S. service members may have been injured in Iran-linked attacks.”

“The number of injured, which includes two dozen service members who may have traumatic brain injuries, is more than twice as many as the Pentagon previously disclosed.”

Huh? That’s odd.

“The military is monitoring approximately two dozen service members who may have suffered traumatic brain injuries (TBI) during the attacks, which are believed to have been carried out by groups with links to Iran, according to U.S. defense officials.”

As long as it’s only traumatic brain injuries!

Glad to hear you’re “monitoring” them, though.

“The Defense Department has previously said 21 service members received minor injuries in attacks on U.S. forces at al-Tanf in southern Syria and on al-Asad air base in western Iraq late last month.”

“Three members of Congress who are all military veterans sent a letter Monday asking Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin how the Pentagon is protecting service members stationed at forward operating bases from traumatic brain injury.”

‘“The Department must proactively work to reduce the risk to service members both to protect our men and women in uniform and to preserve the capability and readiness of forward operating bases,’ Reps. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz.; Morgan Luttrell, R-Texas; and Bill Johnson, R-Ohio, wrote.”

How about asking “the president” and The Department of Defense how may attacks it now takes before we respond with an appropriate response?  

I mean, it seems like once used to be enough.

Just sayin’.

“Since Oct. 17, there have been at least 38 [this has now been updated to 42] separate attacks on bases housing U.S. troops in Syria and Iraq, mainly by one-way drones, mortars or rockets. The two attacks that caused the injuries were both on Oct. 18.”

“A U.S. contractor died that day when he suffered a heart attack sheltering in place at al-Asad, the Pentagon said. The injuries so far include at least 32 people at al-Tanf, 13 at al-Asad and one in Erbil in northern Iraq, according to Pentagon press secretary Brig. Gen. Patrick Ryder.”

“A separate attack on Oct. 25 had the potential to be catastrophic for the U.S. military, two U.S. defense officials said. An explosives-filled drone hit the roof of a building housing U.S. troops on a base in Erbil. The drone did not explode. If it had, dozens of troops inside could have been injured or killed, the officials said.”

So, if this would have happened, we would have responded by blowing up ten empty buildings? Twenty?

I think Iran will trade empty warehouses for injured or killed U.S troops all day long.   

“The U.S. blames the recent attacks on Iranian-backed militia groups. While they have not said Iran is directing the attacks, U.S. officials say Iran is responsible for funding, arming, equipping and training the groups.”

Oh, okay then.

‘“What we want is for Iran to take very specific action to direct its militias and proxies to stand down,’ a senior U.S. defense official said after the strikes last month.”

Or what?

Or you’ll send them a nasty letter?

Have you ever heard, “You can’t always get what you want…?”

I’m sorry, but our Department of Defense has become a joke under the watchful eye of Illegitimate Joe and his bumbling democrat friends and advisors.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Is Ukraine really Synonymous with Democracy and Freedom?

We hear every day that we need to continue our support of Ukraine in the fight for democracy and freedom versus Putin and Russia.

But is Ukraine and Zelensky really that much better than Russia and Putin?

Is Ukraine any better at all?  

According to Allan Ripp, reporting for NBC News, “Ukraine’s Nazi problem is real…”

“Of the many distortions manufactured by Russian President Vladimir Putin to justify Russia’s assault on Ukraine, perhaps the most bizarre is his claim that the action was taken to ‘denazify’ the country and its leadership. In making his case for entering his neighbor’s territory with armored tanks and fighter jets, Putin has stated that the move was undertaken ‘to protect people’ who have been ‘subjected to bullying and genocide,’ [In Biden’s own words, with video cameras rolling, he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin. “I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling Poroshenko. “Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,” Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations event, insisting that President Obama was in on the threat.] and that Russia ‘will strive for the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine.’”

“Putin’s destructive actions — among them the devastation of Jewish communities — make clear that he’s lying when he says his goal is to ensure anyone’s welfare.”

“On its face, Putin’s smear is absurd, not least because Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is Jewish [and Joe Biden is Puerto Rican!] and has said that members of his family were killed during World War II. There is also no evidence of recent mass killings or ethnic purges taking place in Ukraine. Moreover, labeling enemies Nazis is a common political ploy in Russia [and in the U.S., by the way], especially from a leader who favors disinformation campaigns [did somebody say Creepy Joe Biden?] and wants to stir up feelings of national vengeance against a WWII foe to justify conquest.”

“But even though Putin is engaging in propaganda [isn’t everyone?], it’s also true that Ukraine has a genuine Nazi problem — both past and present [well, they’ve got that in common with the democrat party!]. Putin’s destructive actions — among them the devastation of Jewish communities — make clear that he’s lying when he says his goal is to ensure anyone’s welfare. But important as it is to defend the yellow-and-blue flag against the Kremlin’s brutal aggression, it would be a dangerous oversight to deny Ukraine’s antisemitic history and collaboration with Hitler’s Nazis, as well as the latter-day embrace of neo-Nazi factions in some quarters.”

Reeeeally?

“On the eve of World War II, Ukraine was home to one the largest Jewish communities in Europe, with estimates as high as 2.7 million, a remarkable number considering the territory’s long record of antisemitism and pogroms [A pogrom is a violent riot incited with the aim of massacring or expelling an ethnic or religious group, particularly Jews. The term entered the English language from Russian to describe 19th- and 20th-century attacks on Jews in the Russian Empire.]. By the end, more than half would perish. When German troops took control of Kyiv in 1941, they were welcomed by ‘Heil Hitler’ banners. Soon after, nearly 34,000 Jews — along with Roma and other ‘undesirables’ — were rounded up and marched to fields outside the city on the pretext of resettlement only to be massacred in what became known as the ‘Holocaust by bullets.’”

“The Babyn Yar ravine continued to fill up as a mass grave for two years. With as many as 100,000 murdered there, it became one of the largest single killing sites of the Holocaust outside of Auschwitz and other death camps. Researchers have noted the key role locals played in fulfilling Nazi kill orders at the site.”

“Nowadays, Ukraine counts between 56,000 to 140,000 Jews, who enjoy freedoms and protections never imagined by their grandparents. That includes an updated law passed last month criminalizing antisemitic acts. Unfortunately, the law was intended to address a pronounced uptick in public displays of bigotry, including swastika-laden vandalism of synagogues and Jewish memorials, and eerie marches in Kyiv and other cities that celebrated the Waffen SS.”

“In another ominous development, Ukraine has in recent years erected a glut of statues honoring Ukrainian nationalists whose legacies are tainted by their indisputable record as Nazi proxies. The Forward newspaper cataloged some of these ‘deplorables,’ including Stepan Bandera, leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), whose followers acted as local militia members for the SS and German army. ‘Ukraine has several dozen monuments and scores of street names glorifying this Nazi collaborator, enough to require two separate Wikipedia pages,’ the Forward wrote.”

“Another frequent honoree is Roman Shukhevych, revered as a Ukrainian freedom fighter but also the leader of a feared Nazi auxiliary police unit that the Forward notes was ‘responsible for butchering thousands of Jews and … Poles.’ Statues have also been raised for Yaroslav Stetsko, a one-time chair of the OUN, who wrote ‘I insist on the extermination of the Jews in Ukraine.’”

Hmmm.

Ukrainian volunteers with the right-wing paramilitary Azov National Corps with their flags demonstrate their force, during Ukrainian Volunteer Day in Kyiv, Ukraine, Saturday, March 14, 2020. (AP Photo/Efrem Lukatsky)

“Just as disturbing, neo-Nazis are part of some of Ukraine’s growing ranks of volunteer battalions. They are battle-hardened after waging some of the toughest street fighting against Moscow-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine following Putin’s Crimean invasion in 2014. One is the Azov Battalion, founded by an avowed white supremacist who claimed Ukraine’s national purpose was to rid the country of Jews and other inferior races. In 2018, the U.S. Congress stipulated that its aid to Ukraine couldn’t be used ‘to provide arms, training or other assistance to the Azov Battalion.’”

Is that so?

Who exactly is making sure this doesn’t happen?

“Even so, Azov is now an official member of the Ukraine National Guard.”

You don’t say?

In addition to the concerns about Ukrainian Nazism, Tom Vanden Brook and Rachel Looker for USA Today report, “The US has spent billions on Ukraine war aid. But is that money landing in corrupt pockets?”

“With more than $100 billion in U.S. weaponry and financial aid flowing to Ukraine in less than a year – and more on the way to counter Russia’s invasion – concerns about arms falling into terrorists’ hands [again?!] and dollars into corrupt officials’ pockets [don’t they always?] are mounting.”

“The special inspector general who has overseen aid to Afghanistan since 2012, and some House Republicans, warn of the need for closer oversight of the military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine. The scale of the effort is massive. The $113 billion appropriated by Congress in 2022 approaches the $146 billion spent in 20 years for military and humanitarian assistance to Afghanistan…”

‘“When you spend so much money so quickly, with so little oversight, you’re going to have fraud, waste and abuse,’ John Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction, said in an interview.”

The question is then, why is there “so little oversight?”

Because that’s the way they want it!

How can any of this money be effectively kicked back, “wasted and abused,” if we actually require to document where OUR money is going?!

“The Pentagon rejects that narrative, saying safeguards have been put in place to ensure that U.S. weapons are accounted for by the Ukrainian forces after they are transferred.”

Oh…, ok, then…, if the Pentagon says so!

‘“The department takes our commitment to Ukraine seriously, which is why we implemented strong measures to track the capabilities we are providing to equip Ukraine,’ said Sabrina Singh, the Pentagon’s deputy press secretary.”

Define “strong measures.”

“The lack of Ukraine oversight draws parallels to Afghanistan corruption.”

Wow. That’s saying a lot!

“Ukraine has a history of corruption, and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has made stamping it out a priority.”

I believe using the phrase “covering it up” would be more appropriate as opposed to the phrase “stamping it out.”

“James Comer, chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, said Congress must conduct oversight of taxpayer dollars sent overseas. The committee will work to determine whether there was waste or misuse.”

Honestly, I don’t think we need a committee to determine whether there was “waste or misuse,” just how much “waste or misuse.”

‘“We owe it to the American taxpayer to account for how their money is spent,’ Comer said in a statement to USA TODAY.”

Yes, that would be nice, and change of pace to be sure.

Stay thirsty (for the truth) my friends!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Hamas is “The Other Team?!” C’mon, Man!

During our illustrious leader’s latest visit to Israel, cognitively challenged Joe referred to the barbaric terrorist group, Hamas, as “the other team.”

“The other team?”

Like Hamas is a football team, or something!

Except this “team” is guilty of numerous unthinkable atrocities, rather than “pass interference,” “holding,” or “unsportsmanlike conduct.”

After sleepwalking through the remainder of his initial press conference in Israel, Sleepy Joe later felt he had to remind us that, “Hamas does not represent the vast majority of Palestinians.”

Really?

I would beg to differ, Illegitimate Joe.

During their last election, 76% of the Palestinian people supported Hamas backed candidates.

And have we heard ANY Palestinians denouncing Hamas’ disgustingly brutal actions during their initial surprise attack on Israeli civilians, from the Palestinians in Gaza, or from Palestinians anywhere in the world?

The answer to that question would be a big NO, in case you were wondering.

Clueless Joe keeps saying he has unconditional support for Israel, but he has been very reluctant to tie any of the blame back to Iran, who has unquestionably been the sponsor of Hamas’ terrorism.

That could be because Biden, his friend Barak Obummer, and the rest his puppeteers continually propped-up Iran by feeding them boat loads (actually pallet loads of cash in the middle of the night) of U.S. taxpayer money, while relaxing the suffocating economic sanctions that were imposed by former President Trump.

The compromised Biden administration now finds itself in a bit of a conundrum.

It is caught between rich Jewish campaign contributors, and the radical elements (which are quickly becoming the standard bearers, if they aren’t already) of the democrat party.

We also see the democrats caught between undying support for drag queens and pedophiles, while supporting radical Islam at the same time, who would greet their alternative lifestyle friends with the death penalty via Sharia Law.

This whole situation is well on its way to becoming a moral and political circus.

Hopefully they can manage to contain the circus within the circus, and not allow the animals to escape out into the crowd.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑