No oxygen? No problem!

According to David Aaro of Fox News, “Researchers on Monday said they found the first animal out of millions of known species that can survive its entire life without oxygen.”

anooxygen 2

The Henneguya salminicola (H. salminicola) normally lives in the muscle of its salmon host. The 10-celled creature has evolved to the point where it doesn’t breathe at all, according to a study published in the National Academy of Sciences.”

anooxygen 3

‘“Aerobic respiration was thought to be ubiquitous [“present, appearing, or found everywhere,” for all of you hillbillies out there like me] in animals, but now we confirmed that this is not the case,’ said Dorothée Huchon, a zoologist at Israel’s Tel Aviv University in a press release. ‘Our discovery shows that evolution can go in strange directions. Aerobic respiration is a major source of energy, and yet we found an animal that gave up this critical pathway.’”

anooxygen 4

Okay, doc…, I may not have known what “ubiquitous” means, but I’m smart enough to not assume this animal “gave up” its ability to breathe via some reverse evolution process.

I’m also honest enough to admit it when I don’t know something.

The possibility that this creature was designed and created this way is not even considered.

This is just another example which shows these scientists don’t know everything, and actually they know very little in the grand scheme of things.  They don’t even know what they don’t know!

“The new discovery could impact a common understanding between scientists that multicellular life needs oxygen to live on Earth.”

I would say it definitely does “impact a common understanding between scientists that multicellular life needs oxygen to live on Earth,” or anywhere else for that matter.

“Using deep sequencing approaches, the study found the H. salminicola has no mitochondrial DNA — normally containing the genes for respiration — which means the parasite ‘lost the ability to perform aerobic cellular respiration.’”

Excuse me, but no, it doesn’t mean “the parasite lost the ability to perform aerobic cellular respiration.” It means the parasite has no “ability to perform aerobic cellular respiration,” or just doesn’t need to.

Why do these “scientists” always have to interject their evolutionary biases into everything.

It’s not just me…, you can see this as well, right?

“It’s not clear how the H. salminicola survives without oxygen, but Huchon — who led the study — said it might be taking energy from the fish. He added that the parasite’s anaerobic traits were an accidental discovery.”

‘“It’s not yet clear to us how the parasite generates energy,’ Huchon said. ‘It may be drawing it from the surrounding fish cells, or it may have a different type of respiration such as oxygen-free breathing…it has shed unnecessary genes responsible for aerobic respiration and become an even simpler organism.’”

“The parasite is a myxozoan relative of jellyfish and corals that reportedly causes disease or cysts in the flesh of its salmon host, but is harmless to humans.”

Excuse me if I take that “harmless to humans” part with a grain of salt.

“Mitochondrial respiration has been an ancient characteristic of multi-cell organisms on our planet. Every cell in our bodies except red blood cells has large numbers of mitochondria, according to science alert.”

“They are essential for breaking down oxygen to produce adenosine which provides energy to drive many processes in living cells.”

“A few single-cell organisms lost the ability for aerobic respiration, but never in animals, the study said.”

‘“It is generally thought that during evolution, organisms become more and more complex, and that simple single-celled or few-celled organisms are the ancestors of complex organisms,’ Huchon concluded. ‘But here, right before us, is an animal whose evolutionary process is the opposite.’”

So when we discover a creature that flies in the face of the “evolutionary process” [macro-evolution that is], they don’t question the validity of the process, they just write it off and keep right on going.

Very scientific.

So, how far are we away from the parasitic aliens like the creatures from “The Thing” or the “Alien” series of movies?

anooxygen 5

anooxygen 6

We may still be pretty far away, but we definitely are closer!

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Two cases to be made for “creation” versus evolution.

Please refer to my blog from October 11, 2019, “You may not believe in ‘God,’ but you should at least believe in a ‘creator.’”

eye 8

There are many arguments and examples to be made that evolutionists can’t answer.

Here are two of my favorites.

Our first case in point is the human eye.

eye 7

Brian Thomas, PH.D. says, “The eye is very well-constructed.  Its many critical parts work together so that individual light photons are captured and converted into data that the brain then translates into a coherent visual image.  Considering the obvious genius and purpose in eye design, claims that mindless natural processes formed the eye can only be made by ignoring the laws of logic.”

eye 6

Australian neuroscientist Trevor Lamb wrote in a Scientific American article titled “Evolution of the Eye,”  “… only an intelligent agent—not passive, unthinking environmental factors—could fashion the massive collection of interdependent parts that form vertebrate eyes.”

“How could [evolutionary] ‘selection’ have precisely positioned the 12 muscles that adroitly move the eyeball in its socket, including the one that uses a pulley to properly swivel the eyes?  And even if perfectly formed eyes and eye-moving muscles had somehow managed to evolve, the apparatus still would have been useless without the involuntary computations that make both the left and right eyes move in concert.”

“In addition to overlooking these vital features, how could ‘selective [evolutionary] pressures have programmed the brain to convert raw light input into discernible mental images?”

“Magic words and logical fallacies are miserable substitutes for science or reason, but they are apparently the best explanatory tools available to those who are determined to find a purely naturalistic cause for eye origins.  Based on the evidence, the most logical source for the masterfully designed eye is a Master Designer.”

eye 9

I know evolutionists typically feel that given enough time anything can evolve into something else, but even in a hundred trillion years, the eye, with its cooperation between numerous muscles and its function, design and coordination with our brains, could not have “just happened” by virtue of mutations and evolutionary “selections.” Period.

The next case in point is the bombardier beetle.

The bombardier beetle has a special kind of defense mechanism, and an amazingly complicated one at that.

The beetle has twin “exhaust tubes” in his tail from which this beetle fires boiling-hot noxious gases into the face of his enemies.

eye 1

eye 2

German chemist Dr. Schildknecht discovered that the beetle mixes two chemicals (hydrogen peroxide and hydroquinone), which is a dangerous mixture.

The bombardier beetle, however, uses a special “inhibitor” chemical to keep the mixture from reacting and blowing itself up.

How then can the explosion instantaneously occur when needed?

Okay…, stay with me on this.

Dr. Schildknecht discovered that in the beetle’s specially designed combustion tubes are two enzymes called catalase and peroxidase which make chemical reactions go millions of times faster. These chemicals catalyze the extremely rapid decomposition of hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen and the oxidation of hydroquinone into quinone, causing them to violently react and explode—but not so soon as to blow up the beetle, of course!

Common sense, something typically lacking in the liberal evolutionary mind, tells us that this amazing little insect cannon which can fire four or five “bombs” in succession could not have evolved piece by piece. Explosive chemicals, inhibitor, enzymes, glands, combustion tubes, sensory communication, muscles to direct the combustion tubes and reflex nervous systems—all had to work perfectly the very first time—or any hopes for the future of our little bombardier beetle evolving into anything would have all gone up in smoke!

eye 3

The tiny bombardier beetle could not have possibly evolved.  Period.

I think this article successfully debunks the concept of macro evolution and shoots down the big, liberal, evolution lie.

All of the creatures in this world were designed to be just what they are, and are not the result of natural selection and evolution.

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

You may not believe in “God,” but you should at least believe in a “creator.”

For whatever reason, there are people (various scientists, astronomers, cosmologists, scholars and their disciples) who are bound and determined to convince you there is no “God,” there is no “creator” and that everything we see in the universe “just happened.”

Well, let’s take a look at how exactly, THEY BELIEVE, all of this “happened.”

In “the beginning…,” there was nothing…, except a very small ball with infinite density and intense heat called a Singularity.

I’ve heard scientists say that everything that exists in the universe today was compacted down into something about the size of a pea.

creator 14

The Big Bang theory states that all of the current and past matter in the Universe came into existence at the same time, roughly 13.8 billion years ago. At this time, all matter was compacted into that very small ball.  Then, suddenly, the Singularity exploded (began expanding), and the universe as we know it began.  The explosion also created the physical laws that govern our ever-expanding cosmos.

creator 2

Now I ain’t what these “smart people” would call a genius, but I do have some questions.

Like, in the middle of all of this infinite nothingness, where did this “pea” with everything in it come from?

You can’t create something from nothing…, so where did it come from?

And they’re trying to tell me that all the matter in the universe…, all of the galaxies, all of the suns, all of the planets, everything, was squished into something the size of a pea?

And these scientists, astronomers, cosmologists and scholars actually believe this?

Then we have the issue of “life,” and where did we and all of the living things on Earth come from?

Again, for whatever reason, there are people (various scientists, astronomers, cosmologists, scholars and their disciples) who are bound and determined to convince you there is no “God,” there is no “creator” and that all “life” on Earth “just happened.”

Let’s take a look at how exactly, THEY BELIEVE, “life” came to be.

According to them, the first known single-celled organisms appeared on Earth about 3.5 billion years ago, roughly a billion years after Earth formed. More complex forms of life took longer to evolve, with the first multi-cellular animals not appearing until about 600 million years ago.

Scientists and scholars would have us believe that “life” began way back then in a prehistoric tide pool, which was a “soup” containing all of the chemicals and minerals needed to create “life.”

All of these “building blocks of life” were swirling around in this puddle until they randomly coalesced, formed a single cell creature, and was then somehow sparked into “life.”

Or…, these organisms somehow arrived here on a meteorite from outer space, where they would have had to have been randomly created and sparked to life.

These single celled creatures then multiplied, and over another million years these single cell creature evolved into multi-celled creatures.

多細胞化(日本語)

Then, over another million years, these multi-celled creatures became more and more complex, eventually forming the simplest of sea creatures.

creator 6

After millions of years more, some sea creatures evolved to the point where they crawled out of the sea.

creator 7

It was from this creature, which crawled from the ocean, that all reptiles, birds and mammals are descended from…, including us.

So there you have their explanation for the origins of life on our planet.

Again…, I ain’t the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I’m not the dullest either, and I do have a few questions and comments.

First of all, a “simple” single celled creature is not that “simple.”

In fact, a single cell is more complex that a space shuttle.  It’s true.

Print

creator 4

I find it very hard to believe that all of the components of even a single cell would manage to randomly fall into place, much less come to “life.”

If you can get past this first part, I guess the rest of it would seem plausible to you as well.

I guess as long as you have a million years to wait, anything can happen!

“God does not play dice with the universe.” – Albert Einstein

According to an article on Everystudent.com, “Einstein of course believed in mathematical laws of nature, so his idea of a ‘God’ was at best someone who formulated the laws and then left the universe alone to evolve according to these laws,’ physicist Vasant Natarajan wrote in an essay.”

“Einstein himself even cleared up the matter in a letter he wrote in 1954…, “I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.”

So I think we can say that even Einstein, who self admittedly did not believe in “God,” believed in a “creator” and admired the work of this “creator.”

Another EveryStudent.com article says we can use our DNA “ to show that science gives reason to believe in God’s existence.”

“British philosopher, Dr. Antony Flew, was a leading spokesperson for atheism, actively involved in debate after debate. However, scientific discoveries within the last 30 years brought him to a conclusion he could not avoid. In a video interview in December 2004 he stated, ‘Super-intelligence is the only good explanation for the origin of life and the complexity of nature.’  Prominent in his conclusion were the discoveries of DNA. Here’s why.”

“DNA in our cells is very similar to an intricate computer program.”

“A computer program is made up of a series of ones and zeros (called binary code). The sequencing and ordering of these ones and zeros is what makes the computer program work properly.”

“In the same way, DNA is made up of four chemicals, abbreviated as letters A, T, G, and C. Much like the ones and zeros, these letters are arranged in the human cell like this: CGTGTGACTCGCTCCTGAT and so on. The order in which they are arranged instructs the cell’s actions.”

creator 10

“What is amazing is that within the tiny space in every cell in your body, this code is three billion letters long!!”

“To grasp the amount of DNA information in one cell, ‘a live reading of that code at a rate of three letters per second would take thirty-one years, even if reading continued day and night.’  Wait, there’s more.”

“It has been determined that 99.9% of your DNA is similar to everyone’s genetic makeup.  What is uniquely you comes in the fractional difference in how those three billion letters are sequenced in your cells.”

“The U.S. government is able to identify everyone in our country by the arrangement of a nine-digit social security number. Yet, inside every cell in you is a three-billion-lettered DNA structure that belongs only to you. This code identifies you and continually instructs your cells’ behavior.”

“Dr. Francis Collins, director of the Human Genome Project (that mapped the human DNA structure) said that one can ‘think of DNA as an instructional script, a software program, sitting in the nucleus of the cell.’”

“Perry Marshall, an information specialist, comments on the implications of this. ‘There has never existed a computer program that wasn’t designed…[whether it is] a code, or a program, or a message given through a language, there is always an intelligent mind behind it.’”

“Just as former atheist Dr. Antony Flew questioned, it is legitimate to ask oneself regarding this three billion letter code instructing the cell…who wrote this script? Who placed this working code, inside the cell?”

“How can one explain this sophisticated messaging, coding, residing in our cells?”

“When looking at the DNA structure within the human body, we cannot escape the presence of intelligent (incredibly intelligent) design.”

We cannot escape the existence of a “creator.”

These scientists and scholars try to lump their theory of evolution into one general evolution theory.  But in truth, there are different types of “evolution.”

Their big fairy tale version of evolution happening over millions and millions of years is called MACROevolution.

creator 8

creator 9

MICROevolution refers to changes within a species or small group of organisms over a relatively short period of time.

We are allowed to believe in MICROevolution without believing in MACROevolution.

These scientists, astronomers, cosmologists, scholars and their disciples, are always pitting science against “God,” as if we have to choose one or the other.

This is a false narrative.

“God” loves science.

“God” invented science and all of the scientific laws we live by.

This is just another one of the big lies that these liberal pied pipers are attempting to morph into accepted facts.

creator 15

I think this article successfully used science, or the lack thereof, to establish that our world, and we, had a “creator.”

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑