Is Ukraine really Synonymous with Democracy and Freedom?

We hear every day that we need to continue our support of Ukraine in the fight for democracy and freedom versus Putin and Russia.

But is Ukraine and Zelensky really that much better than Russia and Putin?

Is Ukraine any better at all?  

According to Allan Ripp, reporting for NBC News, “Ukraine’s Nazi problem is real…”

“Of the many distortions manufactured by Russian President Vladimir Putin to justify Russia’s assault on Ukraine, perhaps the most bizarre is his claim that the action was taken to ‘denazify’ the country and its leadership. In making his case for entering his neighbor’s territory with armored tanks and fighter jets, Putin has stated that the move was undertaken ‘to protect people’ who have been ‘subjected to bullying and genocide,’ [In Biden’s own words, with video cameras rolling, he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin. “I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling Poroshenko. “Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,” Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations event, insisting that President Obama was in on the threat.] and that Russia ‘will strive for the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine.’”

“Putin’s destructive actions — among them the devastation of Jewish communities — make clear that he’s lying when he says his goal is to ensure anyone’s welfare.”

“On its face, Putin’s smear is absurd, not least because Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is Jewish [and Joe Biden is Puerto Rican!] and has said that members of his family were killed during World War II. There is also no evidence of recent mass killings or ethnic purges taking place in Ukraine. Moreover, labeling enemies Nazis is a common political ploy in Russia [and in the U.S., by the way], especially from a leader who favors disinformation campaigns [did somebody say Creepy Joe Biden?] and wants to stir up feelings of national vengeance against a WWII foe to justify conquest.”

“But even though Putin is engaging in propaganda [isn’t everyone?], it’s also true that Ukraine has a genuine Nazi problem — both past and present [well, they’ve got that in common with the democrat party!]. Putin’s destructive actions — among them the devastation of Jewish communities — make clear that he’s lying when he says his goal is to ensure anyone’s welfare. But important as it is to defend the yellow-and-blue flag against the Kremlin’s brutal aggression, it would be a dangerous oversight to deny Ukraine’s antisemitic history and collaboration with Hitler’s Nazis, as well as the latter-day embrace of neo-Nazi factions in some quarters.”

Reeeeally?

“On the eve of World War II, Ukraine was home to one the largest Jewish communities in Europe, with estimates as high as 2.7 million, a remarkable number considering the territory’s long record of antisemitism and pogroms [A pogrom is a violent riot incited with the aim of massacring or expelling an ethnic or religious group, particularly Jews. The term entered the English language from Russian to describe 19th- and 20th-century attacks on Jews in the Russian Empire.]. By the end, more than half would perish. When German troops took control of Kyiv in 1941, they were welcomed by ‘Heil Hitler’ banners. Soon after, nearly 34,000 Jews — along with Roma and other ‘undesirables’ — were rounded up and marched to fields outside the city on the pretext of resettlement only to be massacred in what became known as the ‘Holocaust by bullets.’”

“The Babyn Yar ravine continued to fill up as a mass grave for two years. With as many as 100,000 murdered there, it became one of the largest single killing sites of the Holocaust outside of Auschwitz and other death camps. Researchers have noted the key role locals played in fulfilling Nazi kill orders at the site.”

“Nowadays, Ukraine counts between 56,000 to 140,000 Jews, who enjoy freedoms and protections never imagined by their grandparents. That includes an updated law passed last month criminalizing antisemitic acts. Unfortunately, the law was intended to address a pronounced uptick in public displays of bigotry, including swastika-laden vandalism of synagogues and Jewish memorials, and eerie marches in Kyiv and other cities that celebrated the Waffen SS.”

“In another ominous development, Ukraine has in recent years erected a glut of statues honoring Ukrainian nationalists whose legacies are tainted by their indisputable record as Nazi proxies. The Forward newspaper cataloged some of these ‘deplorables,’ including Stepan Bandera, leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), whose followers acted as local militia members for the SS and German army. ‘Ukraine has several dozen monuments and scores of street names glorifying this Nazi collaborator, enough to require two separate Wikipedia pages,’ the Forward wrote.”

“Another frequent honoree is Roman Shukhevych, revered as a Ukrainian freedom fighter but also the leader of a feared Nazi auxiliary police unit that the Forward notes was ‘responsible for butchering thousands of Jews and … Poles.’ Statues have also been raised for Yaroslav Stetsko, a one-time chair of the OUN, who wrote ‘I insist on the extermination of the Jews in Ukraine.’”

Hmmm.

Ukrainian volunteers with the right-wing paramilitary Azov National Corps with their flags demonstrate their force, during Ukrainian Volunteer Day in Kyiv, Ukraine, Saturday, March 14, 2020. (AP Photo/Efrem Lukatsky)

“Just as disturbing, neo-Nazis are part of some of Ukraine’s growing ranks of volunteer battalions. They are battle-hardened after waging some of the toughest street fighting against Moscow-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine following Putin’s Crimean invasion in 2014. One is the Azov Battalion, founded by an avowed white supremacist who claimed Ukraine’s national purpose was to rid the country of Jews and other inferior races. In 2018, the U.S. Congress stipulated that its aid to Ukraine couldn’t be used ‘to provide arms, training or other assistance to the Azov Battalion.’”

Is that so?

Who exactly is making sure this doesn’t happen?

“Even so, Azov is now an official member of the Ukraine National Guard.”

You don’t say?

In addition to the concerns about Ukrainian Nazism, Tom Vanden Brook and Rachel Looker for USA Today report, “The US has spent billions on Ukraine war aid. But is that money landing in corrupt pockets?”

“With more than $100 billion in U.S. weaponry and financial aid flowing to Ukraine in less than a year – and more on the way to counter Russia’s invasion – concerns about arms falling into terrorists’ hands [again?!] and dollars into corrupt officials’ pockets [don’t they always?] are mounting.”

“The special inspector general who has overseen aid to Afghanistan since 2012, and some House Republicans, warn of the need for closer oversight of the military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine. The scale of the effort is massive. The $113 billion appropriated by Congress in 2022 approaches the $146 billion spent in 20 years for military and humanitarian assistance to Afghanistan…”

‘“When you spend so much money so quickly, with so little oversight, you’re going to have fraud, waste and abuse,’ John Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction, said in an interview.”

The question is then, why is there “so little oversight?”

Because that’s the way they want it!

How can any of this money be effectively kicked back, “wasted and abused,” if we actually require to document where OUR money is going?!

“The Pentagon rejects that narrative, saying safeguards have been put in place to ensure that U.S. weapons are accounted for by the Ukrainian forces after they are transferred.”

Oh…, ok, then…, if the Pentagon says so!

‘“The department takes our commitment to Ukraine seriously, which is why we implemented strong measures to track the capabilities we are providing to equip Ukraine,’ said Sabrina Singh, the Pentagon’s deputy press secretary.”

Define “strong measures.”

“The lack of Ukraine oversight draws parallels to Afghanistan corruption.”

Wow. That’s saying a lot!

“Ukraine has a history of corruption, and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has made stamping it out a priority.”

I believe using the phrase “covering it up” would be more appropriate as opposed to the phrase “stamping it out.”

“James Comer, chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, said Congress must conduct oversight of taxpayer dollars sent overseas. The committee will work to determine whether there was waste or misuse.”

Honestly, I don’t think we need a committee to determine whether there was “waste or misuse,” just how much “waste or misuse.”

‘“We owe it to the American taxpayer to account for how their money is spent,’ Comer said in a statement to USA TODAY.”

Yes, that would be nice, and change of pace to be sure.

Stay thirsty (for the truth) my friends!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Biden says he’ll do “NOTHING” different to help Americans.

Based on “President” Biden’s first two years in office, this really shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone.

In fact, he and his ilk have done just the opposite for two straight years now.

But, it is an odd political declaration to make at this point, seeing that exit polling, during the recent midterms, indicated over 75% of voters felt our country was “moving in the wrong direction.”

Let me repeat that.

“Over 75% of voters feel our country is “moving in the wrong direction!”

That is quite a significant number.

Per the transcript provided on Whitehouse.gov, regarding remarks by President Biden in his Press Conference of November 9, 2022, President Biden said, regarding taking questions from the Press, “And, so let me start off with a list I’ve been given. Zeke Miller, Associated Press.”

Yes…, by all means, stick to the script you’ve been given by your puppet masters, Cognitively Challenged Joe! So pathetic!

“Thank you, Mr. President,” Zeke Miller replied. “I have two questions for you. You mentioned that Americans are frustrated. And, in fact, 75 percent of voters say the country is heading in the wrong direction, despite the results of last night [election night 2022]. What in the next two years do you intend to do differently to change people’s opinion of the direction of the country, particularly as you contemplate a run for President in 2024?”

‘“Nothing,’ President Biden quickly responded.”

‘“… because they’re just finding out what we’re doing,’ he continued. ‘The more they know about what we’re doing, the more support there is.’”

‘“So, I’m not going to change the direction.’”

‘“I said I ran for three reasons.  I’m going to continue to stay where I’m — and I know — I fully understand the legitimate concern that what I’m saying is wrong.  Okay?’”

Uh…, not really.

What did he say?

I’m not even sure about what he meant to say.

Anyway…, let’s continue.  

Creepy Joe then continued, ‘“One is that I said we’re going to restore the soul of the country, begin to treat each other with decency, honor, and integrity.  And it’s starting to happen.  People are — the conversations are becoming more normal, becoming more — more — how can I say it? — decent.’”

Normal?

Decent?

“Begin to treat each other with decency, honor, and integrity?”

Are you kidding us Illegitimate Joe?

Could I refer you back to your “Gestapo” speech that basically called half of America white supremacists and terrorists, and threats to the country and democracy?

Is that your idea of normal, and treating each other with “decency, honor, and integrity?”  

‘“Second thing I said is I want to build a country from the middle out and the bottom up.  And that way, everybody does fine.  I’m tired of trickle-down.  Not a whole lot trickles down when you trickle down to hardworking folks.’”

Excuse me, Sleepy Joe, but your economic plan of driving us into bankruptcy with outlandish gas prices, and 10%-30%+ inflation on everything else isn’t even allowing for a trickle down. It’s a constipated economy where everybody doesn’t do fine…, everybody does the same, and everybody is losing, unless you’re a government handout hero.  

‘“And the third thing — I know is still very hard — I’m going to do everything in my power to see through that we unite the country.  It’s hard to sustain yourself as a leading democracy in the world if you can’t — can’t generate some unity.’”

‘“So, I’m not going to change anything in any fundamental way.’”

Again, are you kidding us Illegitimate Joe?

Again, let me refer you back to your Hitler wannabe speech that basically called half of America white supremacists and terrorists, and threats to the country and democracy.

Your idea of “unity” is making sure everyone is drinking the democrat totalitarian Kool-aid.

And again, you finished by saying, “So, I’m not going to change anything in any fundamental way.”

And also, again, it is an odd political declaration to make, seeing that exit polling conducted during the recent midterm elections indicated over 75% of voters felt our country was “moving in the wrong direction.”

The only reasons a politician would feel comfortable ignoring the sentiments of tens of millions registered voters are:

A) They don’t plan on running for re-election, or…

B)  They’re not worried about being re-elected.

Hmmm…, now why would Illegitimate Joe not be concerned about being re-elected?

Could it be because he knows he was “installed” as the president once, and knows he can be “installed” again, regardless of what the voters think?

I’m going with the latter line of reasoning.

Keep in mind, “Over 75% of voters feel our country is “moving in the wrong direction!”

Democrats have their national election strategy well established.

270 electoral votes are needed to win a presidential election. The democrats can already bank on the substantial electoral votes from California, Washington, Oregon, New York, and Illinois in their back pockets. So, the election basically comes down to the swing states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada, where election laws, election procedures, and election logistics allow for “manipulations” by the democrats, which are really quite manageable.  

This is why Illegitimate Joe, and his “handlers,” feel comfortable saying he doesn’t plan on changing anything, or doing anything, to address their concerns about the direction of the country.

This version of a democrat dictatorship will eventually lead to the economic and moral destruction of our country, if we don’t stand up and fight back against the democrats somehow.

Again, “Over 75% of voters feel our country is “moving in the wrong direction!”

Yet, the democrats had a very successful, unusually successful, midterm election result.  

Hmmm?

How is this happening again?

Well, it’s almost a week after Election Day now, and “votes” are still being tabulated, and “votes” are still showing up, as needed, from somewhere, and democrat candidates are continuing to pull off tight election wins.

It’s the democrats’ version of democracy in action.      

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.  I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

“Evil” Democrat Policies?

Yes, my friends.

Evil…, with a capital “E.”

Many of the democrat policies we see these days are not just bad ideas…, or misguided ideas…, they are evil in nature, and evil in their implementation.

For example, and in no particular order:

The promotion and execution of an open southern border. Which ignores existing law, and promotes the illegal trafficking of women and children, rape, sex slaves and a life of slavery, not to mention being used as organ donors. In addition, this policy has opened the drug trade for the cartels to new levels, and overdoses and drug deaths in our country to new levels as well.

Evil.

The promotion and implementation of lawlessness in our country. Many new liberal laws call for the release of dangerous criminals, no bail/immediate release of criminals charged with crimes, liberal district attorneys and prosecutors more concerned about criminals rather than the victims and protecting their communities. This along with the defunding of the police, or attempting to abolish the police altogether.

Evil.

Protesters at The Women’s March ‘Rally For Abortion Justice’ in Washington, on Oct. 2, 2021.

The promotion of abortion, right up until the moment of birth, and even after birth!

Evil.  

A “justice” department (DOJ) and an FBI that have been politically weaponized…, dispensing selective justice, and a two-tiered justice system.

Evil.  

The promotion and implementation of policies which make our country and our people dependent on evil regimes for our energy, while forcing our people to live in third world conditions, as well as lying about EVs and “climate change.”

Evil.

Promoting sexuality, and even perverted sexuality, among our elementary children.

Evil.  

Promoting and propagandizing divisive policies and rhetoric in general.

Evil.

The creation of the Covid 19 virus and the spreading of the Covid 19 virus, along with their communist friends in China. This followed by shutting of our country down.., both economically and educationally, while making Big Pharma rich beyond their wildest imaginations, for vaccines that were ineffective at their best, and actually harmful at their worst.

Evil.

“President” Biden, Illegitimate Joe, in his recent “Nazi” throwback speech, said the following:

“… as I stand here tonight, equality and democracy are under assault. We do ourselves no favor to pretend otherwise.”

Yes, they are “Cognitively Challenged” Joe, but “under assault” by who? I would contend You and your shameless friends.   

“Now on our time as we build an America that is more prosperous, free, and just.”

Wait…, say what?

“That is the work of my presidency, a mission I believe in with my whole soul.”

Your “whole soul,” Sleepy Joe? That’s not saying much, if anything.

“But first, we must be honest with each other and with ourselves.”

OK, so, you’ve demonstrated you’re incapable of being honest…, so where do we go from here?

I guess we’ll just see what you have to say, and assume you’re lying.

“Too much of what’s happening in our country today is not normal.”

Well, that was truthful, and you can say that again!

“Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our Republic.”

Okay…, that’s more like the “Lyin’ Biden” we have come to know!

“Now, I want to be very clear, very clear up front. Not every Republican, not even the majority of Republicans, are MAGA Republicans. Not every Republican embraces their extreme ideology. I know, because I’ve been able to work with these mainstream Republicans.”

When Creepy Joe says he wants to be “very clear,” he means clear as mud. And who exactly are these “mainstream Republicans?” I believe he’s referring to our current collection of RINOs.

On a side note…, why don’t we ever see any DINOs?

OK, well, anyway, let’s continue.  

“But there’s no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven and intimidated by Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans. And that is a threat to this country.”

It’s not “a threat to this country,” “Pedo Joe,” it’s a threat to all of the evil “swamp” dwellers,” and the evil, authoritarian, and anti-American democrat party.

“These are hard things, but I’m an American president, not a president of red America or blue America, but of all America. And I believe it’s my duty, my duty to level with you, to tell the truth no matter how difficult, no matter how painful.”

“And here, in my view, is what is true: MAGA Republicans do not respect the Constitution.”

Wait, again…, say whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?!

Who doesn’t respect the Constitution?!!!!!!!!!!!

Who is hindering free speech with political censorship?!!!

Who wants to take away our 2nd amendment rights?!!!!

DEMOCRATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

“They do not believe in the rule of law.”

OMG, wait, again…, say whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?!

Who ignores our immigration laws?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Who has demonstrated over and over again there is a two-tiered justice system?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Who dispenses justice based on skin color or political affiliation?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DEMOCRATS!!!!!!!!

“They do not recognize the will of the people.”

What “people” are you referring to Illegitimate Joe?

You think it’s the “will of the people” to live in fear due to skyrocketing crime?

You think it’s the “will of the people” to suffer through record levels of inflation?

You think it’s the “will of the people” to become dependent on China, Iraq, and Venezuela?

You think it’s the “will of the people” to keep shoveling our money over to Ukraine, while there is like a million things we could use it for here at home?

You think it’s the “will of the people” to allow mountains of fentanyl to pour across our border and kill our children?

You think it’s the “will of the people” to allow human trafficking of women and children by the Mexican Cartels to flourish?

“They refuse to accept the results of a free election, and they’re working right now as I speak in state after state to give power to decide elections in America to partisans and cronies, empowering election deniers to undermine democracy itself.”

There’s so much wrong about this statement, I’m not sure where to begin. Let’s just say the only thing we’re trying to undermine, legally, are democrats gaining any more power.

“MAGA forces are determined to take this country backwards, backwards to an America where there is no right to choose, no right to privacy, no right to contraception, no right to marry who you love. They promote authoritarian leaders, and they fanned the flames of political violence that are a threat to our personal rights, to the pursuit of justice, to the rule of law, to the very soul of this country.”

Again…, what in thee hell are you talking about Cognitively Challenged Joe?!

I guess, yes, we would like to go back to what we had going in like 2018, before the democrats and China dropped the Covid bomb on us, and the rest of the world. What’s wrong with that?

“They look at the mob that stormed the United States Capitol on Jan. 6, brutally attacking law enforcement, not as insurrectionists who placed a dagger at the throat of our democracy, but they look at them as patriots.”

Hell yeah we do. And there’s nothing wrong with that, or illegal about that.

“They tried everything last time to nullify the votes of 81 million people.”

You got 81 million votes Illegitimate Joe, but 81 million people did not vote for you. Let’s just make that clear. There’s no way you got 10 million more votes than Barak Obama, when you barely left your basement in Delaware to campaign.

“MAGA Republicans have made their choice. They embrace anger.”

We don’t “embrace anger,” Creepy Joe, but we are angry.

“They thrive on chaos. They live, not in the light of truth but in the shadow of lies.”

You’re talking about your liberal friends here, right Pedo Joe? You can’t be talking about anyone else.

“I know this nation. I know you, the American people. I know your courage, I know your hearts, and I know our history.”

Lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, and lie.

“This is a nation that honors our Constitution.”

True, some of us do.

“We do not reject it.”

Lie.

“This is a nation that believes in the rule of law.”

True, some of us do.

“We do not repudiate it.”

Lie.

“This is a nation that respects free and fair elections.”

True, some of us do…, but definitely not you or your cheating accomplices.

“And this is a nation that rejects violence as a political tool. We do not encourage violence.”

You do realize, Creepy Joe, that we all watched daily and nightly violent riots that lasted for months and months, all supported and encouraged by democrats, don’t you?

“We are still an America that believes in honesty and decency and respect for others.”

Yeah, we as Trump supporters really appreciate your “respect” for us. Ha!

“And yet, history tells us that blind loyalty to a single leader and a willingness to engage in political violence is fatal to democracy.”

Agreed. You can say that again, Adolf, er, uh, I mean Joe.

“We’re all called by duty and conscience to confront extremists who put their own pursuit of power above all else.”

Couldn’t agree with you more! You all democrats got any mirrors over there in D.C.? Just sayin’.

“Ladies and gentlemen, we can’t be pro-insurrectionist and pro-American.”

First of all…, did you just reduce us all to only two genders, Creepy Joe? How dare you!

And, second, “We can’t be pro-insurrectionist and pro-American?” Tell that to the leaders of The Boston Tea Party, or any of the Rebel scum who stood up against the British. I believe the founders would say it is our duty to stand up against your totalitarian b#llshit.

“Even in this moment with all the challenges we face, I give you my word as a Biden, I’ve never been more optimistic about America’s future. Not because of me, but because of who you are.”

O-M-G.

“I give you my word as a Biden?”

If only you could truly understand how comical and how utterly worthless that statement is.  

Don’t allow yourself to be fooled my friends.

THEIR ACTIONS speak louder than THEIR WORDS.

“Evil” Democrat Policies?

Yes, my friends.

Evil…, with a capital “E.”

Again, many of the democrat policies we see these days are not just bad ideas…, or misguided ideas…, they are evil in nature, and evil in their implementation.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.  I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

O Canada! What the heck is going on up there?!

According to Reuters News Agency, on February 14, “Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau invoked rarely-used special measures to end protests that have shut some border crossings and paralyzed downtown Ottawa.”

“He said he would invoke the Emergencies Act to deal with the ‘Freedom Convoy’ protests, started on Jan. 28 by Canadian truckers opposing a vaccinate-or-quarantine mandate for cross-border drivers. They have turned into a rallying point for people opposed to a range of Trudeau’s policies, including COVID-19 pandemic restrictions and a carbon tax.”

“The act gives the government temporary powers it does not normally have, such as the power to impose special restrictions on public assembly and travel, and to mobilize federal support for local and provincial police. It gives the federal government power to implement temporary measures to ensure safety and security during national emergencies.”

Ottawa’s police chief shed some additional light on what these “measures to ensure safety” looks like. According to The National Post, “‘We will actively look to identify you’: Ottawa police chief warns departed protesters.”

‘“If you are involved in this protest, we will actively look to identify you and follow up with financial sanctions and criminal charges,’ Ottawa police tweeted Sunday. A day earlier, interim Police Chief Steve Bell was asked whether police would continue to go after those protesters who had remained in Ottawa, even if they chose to go home at some point.”

‘“The simple answer is yes,’ he said, adding the investigation would go on for ‘months to come.’”

Okay, Heinrich Himmler Jr.!

And Trudeau has the nerve to call the protesters Nazis?!

This doesn’t sound like a “temporary” emergency act to me.

‘“You have my commitment that that investigation will continue and we will hold people accountable for taking our streets over,’ Bell said.”

“At the Ottawa police press conference Saturday, Bell noted there are different streams to the ongoing investigations, from ‘a federal financial level, from a provincial licensing level, from a Criminal Code level, from municipal breach of court order, breach of court injunction level. It will be a complicated and time-consuming investigation that will go on for a period of time.’”

Reuters continues, “A declaration of a public welfare emergency allows the government to regulate the distribution of essential goods, decide what are essential services, and impose fines on violations of the act.”

“Banks and financial institutions will be able to temporarily freeze the accounts of those suspected of supporting the blockades, without obtaining a court order.”

“WITHOUT OBTAINNG A COURT ORDER!”

“The insurance on vehicles being used in the protests can also be suspended.”

“Trudeau said the measures would be ‘geographically specific and targeted only to where they are needed.’ They will also be ‘time limited.’”

Really? I guess we’ll just have to wait and see about that.

Even as I’m writing this blog, “Canada’s parliament backed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s decision to invoke rarely-used emergency powers to end pandemic-related protests that have blocked streets in the capital Ottawa (for three more weeks).”

“The Emergencies Act was approved in parliament by 185 to 151, with the minority Liberal government getting support from left-leaning New Democrats.”

You can always count on the democrats (in Canada and the U.S.) to get behind anything that limits freedom and gives more power to the federal government.

I’ll be keeping you posted.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Google’s “Nazi-like” Behavior!

Does “Nazi-like” seem a bit extreme when describing Google’s recent behavior?

Perhaps to you, but not to someone who has experienced their censorship firsthand.

Let me lay-out my case against Google for you, then you can be the judge.

I launched my blog, “MrEricksonRules.com,” towards the end of 2017, so, 2018 was really my first full year.

It was tough sledding, getting my blog off the ground, and in 2018 my blog was viewed a total of 2,882 times the whole year, or about 9 times a day.  It was a little discouraging, but I kept plugging.

The next year, in 2019, my blog jumped up to 10,961 views, or about 30 views per day. This was quite an improvement, and my blog was definitely trending upward.

My blog really started to take-off in 2020! During the months of January through October my conservative, pro-Trump, blog received 57,571 views! That’s 5,757 views per day! My viewership was growing exponentially! And I was very excited about it.

Well, the growth of by blog seemingly ended the following month, in November of 2020, presidential election month 2020.

In November of 2020, my views dropped to 1,800, then to 1,300 in December, as the fairness of the election was questioned. Ever since then my average views have dipped to about 1,000 a month. My blog viewership has basically returned to my 2019 levels.

So, what switch was flipped, regarding my conservative blog, towards the end of October 2020?

How was my blog “flagged” by Google and their search algorithm, to somehow limit the people gaining access to my blog?

Oh…, and I forgot to mention that this apparent censorship of my blog by Google occurred while I was paying Google, on a monthly basis, to promote my blog!!!

Typical shameless “Demonazi” behavior.

When I questioned Google about my obvious censorship, I only received denials, claims of ignorance, and then being brushed-off. It was a miracle I was able to actually make my case to a human in the first place. All of these tech giants are very good at building an apparent impenetrable wall around themselves.

You may say, “Why do you single out Google, when there are many internet search engines?”

Well, Google handles over 90 percent of all search queries worldwide, and Google is undoubtedly dominating the global search engine market share. As of November 2021, a whopping 91.4 percent of all search queries conducted across all search engine providers are done through the internet giant.

That’s why.

And I’m sure I’m not alone with my experience with Google.

I’m sure many conservative, pro-Trump, sources of information and opinion were targeted and discriminated against by this arm of the Demonazi propaganda machine, in an attempt to sway the 2020 presidential election.

As it turns out, they (the democrats) found other ways to “sway” the 2020 election…, but that’s a different blog for a different day.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you,

MrEricksonRules.

No justice for Ashli Babbitt.

Tucker Carlson, of Fox News, says, “America is now one nation with two very different justice systems.”

I would say this has been the case for quite a few years now!

“The people in power crack down on their enemies and give their allies a soft landing.”

“The ironically-named ‘Civil Rights Division’ of the Biden Justice [InJustice] Department announced Wednesday [4/14/21] there will be no charges brought against the man who shot and killed protester Ashli Babbitt in the Capitol back in January. No one who pays attention was surprised to hear this.”

If it was a black woman, or a liberal protester, who got shot by a white cop, there damn sure would be charges being brought, and lynch mobs forming, just like in Minnesota these days.  

Just sayin’.

Please see my prior blogs on this matter for a better frame of reference:

https://mrericksonrules.com/2021/01/12/the-storm-is-here/

https://mrericksonrules.com/2021/01/29/so-hows-that-investigation-going/

https://mrericksonrules.com/2021/03/03/let-me-tell-you-whats-up-with-the-jan-6-capitol-riot/

https://mrericksonrules.com/2021/03/17/wheres-the-justice-for-ashli-babbitt/

 “In cases like this, the benefit of the doubt usually does go to law enforcement, and as we’ve often said, we’re fine with that. It should. But still, in a free society, the rest of us have a right to know roughly what happened. In this case, who shot Ashli Babbitt and why?”

You forget, Tucker, that the new deep state “Gestapo” doesn’t have to answer to anybody. 

“No one will tell us. The Biden administration says the man who killed Babbitt is a Capitol Hill police officer, and he did the right thing. That’s all they’ve said.”

“Did the right thing?”

“Did the right thing” where?

Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, Communist China, North Korea?

Does the United States fit in with this group now?

“We know that Ashli Babbitt was short, female [an Air Force veteran] and unarmed. There’s no evidence the officer who killed her gave any kind of verbal warming before he pulled the trigger. Is that standard procedure?”

No.

“We’d imagined the rules of engagement for federal agents limited the use of deadly force to situations where law enforcement has reason to believe they or the people around them are in imminent danger of being harmed. You can’t just shoot people without warning because they’re in the wrong place. That’s not allowed.”

“Except now, apparently, it is allowed.”

“When did these rules change?”

When the Democrat Nazi Party assumed power.

“And, once again, who exactly shot Ashli Babbitt? Journalists exist to ask questions like these, but they’re not.”

“The Washington Post wrote a long story about the DOJ’s [Ha! You the “J” in DOJ stands for justice?!] announcement in the case and never raised a single one of these questions. The Post didn’t name the shooter or even acknowledge that the government is withholding his name.” 

Why would the government be able to withhold his name?

How is the government able to withhold his name?

‘“Authorities determined that there was insufficient evidence to prove Babbitt’s civil rights were violated,’ the Post declared. That was it. The rest of the piece was a personal attack on Ashli Babbitt and her political views. She deserved to die. That was the point of the Washington Post story.”

Regardless of whether her civil rights were violated or not [they were], she was murdered by a Capitol police officer, and there’s plenty of evidence to prove that.

This officer has obviously been offered protection as long as he keeps his mouth shut, concerning the circumstances of their response to the protesters and the shooting itself.     

“How amazing to read something like this, especially now. Eleven hundred miles from Washington, in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, a police officer accidentally reached for her gun instead of a Taser and killed a man called Daunte Wright. It was a tragedy, as all shootings are. But we know that officer’s name because every news organization in the country printed it immediately. She has now resigned and is facing charges. Her mugshot is all over the Internet. Two nights ago, a mob showed up at her house, forcing her to flee.”

Quite a difference between how the two cases are being handled.  

Like Tucker said, “America is now one nation with two very different justice systems,” although neither is affording any justice.

“She’s not the only one. Last August, a police officer in Kenosha, Wisconsin shot a man called Jacob Blake. Remember that? Riots erupted immediately. Yesterday, that officer was cleared of all charges. When that story broke, NPR put that police officer’s name and photograph on the front of their website.”

“So that’s the standard, except in this case where they are still hiding the identity of the man who shot Ashli Babbitt.”

Ashli, of course, was white, a conservative, and a Trump supporter, deeming her unworthy of any rights or consideration at all…, just like a Jew back in the days of the Nazis and the Third Reich.  

“Sensing a theme here? The standards that big news organizations use to cover shootings depend entirely on the political views of the people who get shot. When The Washington Post doesn’t like the candidates you vote for, they suppress the details of the case. In the case of Ashli Babbitt, we’d know next to nothing about how she died, and we wouldn’t know anything if her shooting hadn’t been captured on video by people who don’t work at the Washington Post.” 

“One of those people is a video editor from Texas called Samuel Montyoa. Montoya was in the U.S. Capitol that day. Montoya doesn’t look much like a White supremacist, and he has no criminal history that we’re aware of. On Jan. 6, Samuel Montoya took what may be the clearest video of Ashli Babbitt’s death:

https://mssl.fwmrm.net/m/1/382114/77/9982029/21NFM134830H_ENT_MEZZ_HULU_2968404_578.mp4

“When you watch the video, there are a lot of things to notice. Ashli Babbitt had no weapon. She wasn’t attacking anyone. She couldn’t attack anyone, because she was climbing through a window at the moment she was shot. But what’s most striking is that several Capitol Hill police officers in paramilitary gear were standing directly behind Babbitt when she was killed. They were carrying what Joe Biden refers to as weapons of war — loaded AR-15s.”

In addition, as you watch the video, you can see, initially, there are three Capitol police officers standing between the group of protesters in the hallway and the doors.

At this point, everything seems to be relatively under control.  Then for some reason the three officers abandon their position in front of the doors and move behind the group, seemingly allowing, or even inviting, the protesters to have their way with the doors.

Then, you can see the officer on the other side of the doors, who is black, step out and shoot Ashli Babbitt.

The officer shoots at Ashli Babbitt, who is in a crowed of people, with the three other armed officers directly behind her!

The three officers behind Ashli apparently didn’t think she was a threat.

They didn’t lift a finger to stop what was going on.

And anyone of those three could have been very easily hit by the officer firing the shot as well.

Even if Ashli did manage to get through the doors, what was she going to do that justified her being killed?   

Tucker continues, “So, tell us again how Ashli Babbitt posed an imminent physical threat to anyone when she was shot. She didn’t. Samuel Montoya’s footage proves it. And we’re grateful we have that tape. If we didn’t, The New York Times would be telling us that Ashli Babbitt was beating people to death with a fire extinguisher when she was killed.  Thanks to Samuel Montoya, the New York Times can’t claim that.”

The story about the guy beating an officer with a fire extinguisher turned out to be made up propaganda as well.

“We’d love to have Montoya on ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ to describe what he saw that day, but we can’t do that, because he’s in jail.”

“Yesterday, a large group of armed federal agents showed up at his house in Austin. They smashed Montoya’s front door, confiscated his electronic devices and threw him in jail.”

Sounds like the new democrat “Gestapo” to me!

“He’s behind bars right now.  What was his crime?” 

“Well, to find out, we read the Biden administration’s arrest warrant application. The FBI says it began investigating Montoya after one of his family members provided ‘proof that Montoya was physically inside the U.S. Capital near the shooting of a woman on January 6, 2021.’ To be clear, Montoya didn’t shoot the woman. He just happened to be nearby.”

So, the guy who took the video of the shooting is arrested, but the guy who actually did the shooting wasn’t?

“But wait a second. Weren’t there plenty of journalists inside the Capitol on Jan. 6? According to CNN, yes there were. CNN ran a piece telling us that, ‘Congressional reporters became the country’s eyes and ears as rioters stormed Capitol Hill.’ So why hasn’t the FBI arrested the people CNN identified in its story — the photographers from Getty, the political reporters from NBC, the congressional correspondents from CNN and the AP?”

Those people were all authorized to be there by the democrat “Gestapo,” silly! That’s why.  

“Well, that’s a good question. The FBI explains why in the warrant affidavit. ‘At times during the video, Montoya describes himself to others inside the Capitol Building as a “reporter” or “journalist” as he attempts to get through crowds.’ And yet, the FBI concludes, ‘The director of the Congressional press galleries within the Senate Press office did a name check on Samuel Christopher Montoya and confirmed that no one by that name has Congressional press credentials as an individual, or via any other organizations.’”

The nerve of this individual to “identify” himself as a reporter!!!

Form the firing squad immediately!

“So, that’s the standard. If the U.S. Congress’s credentialing office says that you’re not a journalist, you’re not a journalist. Did Samuel Montoya have strong personal political views? Apparently, he did. But you may have noticed that’s not so unusual in journalism right now. So why is journalist Samuel Montoya behind bars tonight? Well, he committed a crime? ‘Interfering with government business.’ In other words, trespassing. If this happened in Ukraine, what are the chances NBC News would describe Samuel Montoya as a ‘dissident journalist,’ and then describe Ashli Babbitt an ‘unarmed pro-democracy demonstrator?’ The chances are roughly 100%.”

“But this is America, and they’re not saying that. Instead they’re telling us that Ashli Babbitt deserved to die.”

“Joy Reid, of MSNBC, said, ‘She embraced conspiracy theories. Her name was Ashli Babbitt, 35 years old. She tweeted about Pizzagate. She tweeted thousands of tweets to Fox News hosts. She engaged [on] social media with the conspiracy news Internet site Info Wars. In 2020, she began to tweet with QAnon accounts and use QAnon hashtags.’”

“Oh, see, not a pro-democracy demonstrator, not an unarmed military veteran. So, she sent tweets to Fox News hosts. No problem. Ashli Babbitt got what she deserved.”

“What’s amazing is not simply the grotesque cruelty of assessments like that — a young women is shot to death and the media applaud — but what’s more amazing is the contrast between this and the coverage of other violence that’s now in progress.”

“Tuesday night, Biden voters burned a police building in Portland, Oregon. Did you know that? Probably not, it didn’t get much coverage.” 

“In the wake of Daunte Wright’s death Sunday, riots broke out all over the country, in New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, and Minneapolis.”

“People were stealing stuff off store shelves, but don’t call it looting. It’s a peaceful demonstration. We know that because the mayor of Brooklyn Center, Mike Elliott, told us so. Tuesday night, Mayor Elliott tweeted a picture of himself on the scene.”

‘“Earlier this evening, I had the opportunity to go talk to these peaceful protesters,’ he wrote. ‘Our city is calm now.’”

“Here’s the funny thing: the mayor’s wearing a Kevlar helmet in the picture, which was not taken in Syria, but in his own town. That’s how peaceful it is. He was wearing a Kevlar helmet. Whatever else he is, Mike Elliott isn’t a very effective liar.”

“Laws have no meaning if they’re not applied equally. When they are not applied equally, they are not even laws. They’re just tools of political persecution. You don’t want to live in a country like that, even if the people you don’t like are the ones being persecuted.”

“Rashida Tlaib does want to live like that. Tlaib is a member of Congress, so her security is never in doubt. She’s protected by bodyguards, weapons of war, and now thousands of federal troops you’re paying for. She’s fine. But in your neighborhood, she’d like to see the police eliminated.”

‘“No more policing, incarceration, and militarization,’ Tlaib wrote on Twitter this week. ‘It can’t be reformed.’”

“Again, militarization is fine if the military is protecting her. She’s got federal troops. But not for you. You get mob rule. We’re not making this up, we’re not misquoting her. She’s demanding this in public as a member of Congress. Many are.”

“A panel of privileged people tell you to abolish the police. But they’re not saying actually abolish the police. We often claim they are, but listen very carefully. They say they want to abolish American policing as it currently exists. And that raises the question: how does policing currently exist?”

“Here’s how: local communities get to control it. So, the cops walking down your street, you hired them. That’s what Rashida Tlaib doesn’t like. That’s what offends MSNBC. The thing they hate about it is that they don’t control it. They can’t use your local police department to punish you for your political views. For that, they have to go to the FBI. It drives them crazy.” 

“Abolishing the police doesn’t mean getting rid of people with guns. It merely and specifically means stripping you of any control over local law enforcement. It’s just a more ambitious form of gun control, meant to disempower the citizenry, not protect them. When your police department answers to them, things will be very different.” 

“To get a sense of how different, take a look at what the Biden administration is doing in the state of Oregon. In the past few days, federal prosecutors have essentially dropped half a dozen federal felony cases that arose from those famous riots in Portland last summer. The feds reached non-prosecution agreements, which ensure that people who committed felonies will walk away with no criminal record of any kind.”

“What are the defendants in Oregon accused of doing? More than trespassing.”

“One of them, a woman called Alexandra Eutin, was charged with beating a Portland police officer in the head with a wooden shield while he was trying to make an arrest.”

“Now that’s bad, obviously. But it’s not quite as bad as, say, voting for Donald Trump, or walking around the Capitol building with a camera. Alexandra Eutin won’t have a criminal record by the end of this. Samuel Montoya could spend the next seven years in jail.”

“You see what’s going on. Two systems of justice — one for the allies of the people in charge, and a very different one for their enemies. These aren’t traditional liberals. They’re not calling for a peaceful utopia where no one uses violence. This isn’t the tradition of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King. That was the old liberalism. We used to make fun of it, when it was going on. We could use a lot more of it now. This stuff is scary.”

Agreed.

This stuff is very scary.

Our country is being hijacked right before our eye by “the deep state,” a razor thin majority in the House of Representatives, no majority in the Senate, and an illegitimate president.  

Tucker Carlson’s statements here were adapted from his opening commentary on the April 14, 2021 edition of “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.  I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Beto O’Rourke said what?!!!

According to David Rutz of Fox News, “Beto O’Rourke says U.S. could become like Nazi Germany in 10 years, despite Biden’s win.”

Despite Biden’s win (which wasn’t really a win, by the way)?!!!

“Could become like Nazi Germany in 10 years?”

How about right now?!!!

Which party is currently supporting censorship and the silencing of its critics?

The democrats.

Which party is currently calling for the abolishment of the 2nd Amendment, and the removal of the peoples’ right to bear arms?

The democrats.

Whose party currently controls most of the media, while manipulating the propaganda which is disseminated to the public?

The democrats.

Which party is it which currently surrounded our capitol with barbed wire fence and is occupying the capitol with thousands of troops?

The democrats…, and establishment, RINO, republicans.

And that’s right now!!!

So, do you think you should maybe rethink the whole “Nazi” thing, Beto, or are you really aware of the truth and this is just an old Nazi propaganda maneuver?

I’m going with the Nazi propaganda maneuver.  

“O’Rourke compared Trump administration to the Third Reich during failed presidential run.”

Oh, really?

You “Beto” be kidding us, Beto!

“Democratic politician [Robert Francis] Beto [‘Beto’ is a common shortening of the name ‘Roberto,’ or ‘Robert.’] O’Rourke [Please note that Beto currently does not hold an office.] fretted Thursday on MSNBC that the United States could become Nazi Germany within 10 years, in spite of full Democratic control of the White House and Congress.” In spite of full Democrat control of the White House and Congress?!!!

Again…, how about as a result of?!!!

And, of course, MSNBC’s cast of liberal tools just ate these remarks up and didn’t challenge or question a thing.   

“On [MSDNC’s…, I mean MSNBC’s] ‘Morning Joe,’ O’Rourke likened efforts by former President Donald Trump and some Republican allies to overturn President Joe Biden’s election victory to the failed Beer Hall Putsch coup attempt by Adolf Hitler in 1923.”

Wow…, that’s a stretch, Beto. 

What democrat dweeb propaganda researcher came up with that little historic nugget for you?

So, what is this “Beer Hall Putsch coup” O’Rourke is referring to? 

On November 8–9, 1923, Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party led a coalition group in an attempt to overthrow the German government. This attempted coup d’etat came to be known as the Beer Hall Putsch.

They began at the Bürgerbräu Keller, a beer hall in the Bavarian city of Munich. Hitler and the Nazi Party aimed to seize control of the state government, march on Berlin, and overthrow the German federal government. They sought to establish a new government to oversee the creation of a unified Greater German Reich. In this new government, citizenship would be based on race.

The putsch failed and Bavarian authorities prosecuted nine participants, including Hitler. Despite its failure, the leaders ultimately redefined the putsch as a heroic effort to save the nation.

Can I just remind you, Beto, that President Trump was the leader of the incumbent government at the time, and he could have legally invoked Martial law to address the fraudulent election if he desired to.

Your analogy here is completely fraudulent…, just like you and the rest of your democrat friends.   

‘“The proudest democracy on the face of the planet will become a memory if we do not fight for it right now,’ O’Rourke said.”

That’s the first bit of truth that’s dribbled out of your mouth, Beto, albeit you’re upside down regarding who has to fight, and who has to fight who!

It seems that O’Rourke has conveniently forgotten about the coup attempt, perpetrated on President Trump, by the democrats in Obama’s administration, including Obama and Biden themselves, along with elements of the FBI and the DOJ.  

But, then “the coup” was overlooked by the leftwing propaganda media, and instead the phony Russian collusion hoax was pushed on the people for well over two years!!!

We also saw the Mueller investigation…, a modern day version of the Nazi Gestapo, come up empty against President Trump…, but again, this was overlooked, and the Russian collusion narrative was allowed to continue regardless. 

‘“So, we should take no comfort in the fact that Joe Biden was successfully sworn in, no comfort in the fact that Congress seems to be operating as normal. This thing is on a roll right now.”

Believe me, Beto, millions of us are taking NO comfort that Illegitimate Joe was sworn in, or that the democrats control Congress.

No comfort at all.

“And if you look at the Beer Hall Putsch in Germany, 1923, it was 10 years later Hitler is chancellor. We are operating under the big lie right now in America. We’ve got to stop it. That’s up to all of us in this great democracy.’”

It is true that “We are operating under the big lie right now in America,” Beto.

THE BIG DEMOCRAT LIE!!!

And that, YES, “WE’VE GOT TO STOP IT!!!”  

“O’Rourke served three terms in the House of Representative before launching a failed bid to oust Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, in 2018. He used the liberal fame from his narrow defeat as a springboard to run for president, but he never gained traction and dropped out of the Democratic primary battle in October 2019.”

So, Beto gained liberal fame, and political momentum, by losing to Ted Cruz?

Interesting.

“He pushed Biden to consider Texas a swing state in 2020, but Trump defeated Biden by nearly six points there and improved on his showing with Hispanic voters from 2016.”

So, I guess, many Hispanic voters in Texas didn’t fall for the democrats’ playing the “race card…,” again, while The President played “the Trump card!”  

“O’Rourke often compared the Trump administration to the Third Reich during his failed presidential campaign.”

“O’Rourke slammed Cruz for joining in the Republican challenge of the Electoral College certification in January, which preceded the deadly Capitol riot by a mob of Trump supporters on Jan. 6.”

Hey, Beto…, do you realize that challenging the Electoral College certification is something completely within the republicans’ rights, and something the democrats have done after the elections of 2000, 2004, and 2016?   

“Cruz also echoed Trump’s unproven claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election.”

Well, Beto…, the “unproven” part of 2020 election fraud is yet to be determined.  Most courts have refused to even hear the arguments or allow for an auditing of ballots.

‘“When Ted Cruz helps to incite that sedition, seeks to overturn a lawfully, legitimately, democratically decided election, he is just as culpable for the insurrection,’ O’Rourke said.”

Aren’t you glad you have MrEricksonRules here properly point out all of this hypocrisy and devilry?!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Democrat Nazism.

“Democrat Nazism” is a term I coined to describe the type of Nazis these current democrats are.

They aren’t an example of the original, or traditional, Nazis.

They aren’t an example of neo-Nazis, like skinheads.

They represent their own version of Nazism…, Democrat Nazism.

The scary thing about Democrat Nazism is that the top people behind it are not out in front of it, but lurking in the shadows.

These are people with A LOT of money who fund any anti-American and anti-decency group they can.   

The people we see in our government, the people running “big tech,” the mainstream media, any many other people running many other companies, are just puppets and useful idiots in the grand scheme of things.

These knowingly, or unknowingly, Democrat Nazis are most assuredly a formidable group, however.

They operate under the same American freedoms that they hope to destroy, while they deflect from their own actions, and accuse those trying to defend our freedoms as the fascists.

It’s a brilliant strategy.

Evil, but brilliant.

These people are not stupid and they cannot, and should not, be underestimated.

They are constantly working to redirect our attention away from themselves and onto other fake news like Russian collusion, impeachment hoaxes, and any other crap they can manage to stick to the wall.   

The bottom line is, a world without the United States, as we know it, will become a world none of us will want to live in.

Do any of these quotes sound familiar today?

They should.

It’s been around 80 years since most of them were said, but most of them apply to the democrats of today.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

“Liberals” aren’t liberal anymore!

Please refer to my blog, published November 6, 2017, “O True Liberals, True Liberals, wherefore art thou True Liberals?”

https://mrericksonrules.com/2017/11/06/o-true-liberals-true-liberals-wherefore-art-thou-true-liberals/

I guess I was a little bit ahead of my time.

Yes, it’s true…, “liberals” aren’t the real “liberals” anymore.

And they haven’t been for a while.  

In a strange reversal of roles, the “conservatives” have become the new “liberals!”

Don’t believe me?

Well, let’s take a look at what’s been happening in our country.

In recent years, it is the democrats, the former liberals, who have been quashing freedom of speech and freedom of thought, at what had previously been the most liberal places in our country, our colleges and universities!

The supposed places of “higher learning!”

It is the democrats, the former liberals, who have, and who are continuing to hijack our language.

Jim Harbison of the Las Cruces Sun-News, says, “We now live in a Wikipedia society — where anyone can change the meaning of a word to satisfy some misguided or politically correct social engineering goal. Progressives have become masters of vocabulary manipulation and are constantly changing the traditional meaning of words to fit their political agenda.”

“They have co-opted the meaning of words to deceive the uninformed, uneducated and apathetic public. This is not a new concept and it has been in practice for decades. It has, however, become a more prominent tactic of the political left in recent years.”

“In the 1990s, President Clinton famously defended his conduct with Monica Lewinski by stating ‘It depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is.’ I think most people who completed high school English commonly understood the definition of the word to be the third-person singular present tense of the English language verb ‘to be.’ Its meaning was clear to everyone except the Democrats.”

“Liberals [the former liberals] have hijacked many words. For example, the word gay originally meant feelings of being ‘carefree’ or ‘happy.’ Now the most commonly accepted use of the word gay primarily refers to a homosexual person or the trait of being homosexual.”

“The term illegal immigration is no longer politically acceptable because it might reflect negatively upon some poor, misunderstood ‘migrant’ who entered the United States illegally seeking a better life. The liberal [formerly liberal] left now identifies them as undocumented immigrants, and sometimes called unregistered Democrats.”

“Even the concept and word ‘taxes’ has not gone unchanged. The government now prefers to call taxes ‘revenue enhancements,’ welfare or public assistance is now ‘entitlements,’ and hunger is now ‘food insecurity.’ Racism is no longer based on religion, color, creed but on political orientation, and anyone who challenges the liberal left’s agenda is branded a ‘racist.’”

We are also not supposed to use the gender specific terms, man, woman, mother, father, sister, brother, grandmother, or grandfather anymore.

It is the democrats, the former liberals, who are the purveyors of widespread censorship in our country.

We are seeing examples of this by democrat held companies like Google, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon and Apple, just to name a few.

I have experienced the wrath of Google and Facebook myself, on numerous occasions.  

And now our own government is even getting in on the act, attempting to silence any potential opposition to their agenda.

We have even heard democrats call for “reeducation camps” now, for those in opposition to their madness!

It’s actually kind of scary.

Yes, my friends…, the tables have definitely turned, and I am more than happy to assume the title of “liberal” now.

So, now when you hear these democrat, neo-fascist, socialists, communists, and Nazis in waiting referred to as “liberals,” you will know who the real “liberals” are.   

It is my hope that someday, my children, their children, and their children’s children will be able to look back on what this “liberal” stood for…, true American freedom and true American liberty, and be proud of this old man.  

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.  

Liberals are the new Nazis! “Sieg Heil,” ABC News!!!

There were Nazis, then neo-Nazis, and now we have “democrat Nazism.”

You heard that term here first!

In the words of Ricky Bobby, from the movie “Talladega Nights:”

“That there is trademarked, not to be used without expressed written permission of Ricky Bobby, Inc.”

In this case, MrEricksonRules, LLC.

According to David Rutz of Fox News, “ABC News calls for ‘cleansing the movement’ of Trump supporters following the Capitol riots.”

“ABC News stealth-edited the piece, and changed it to ‘cleaning up.’”

“An ABC News article calling for the ‘cleansing’ of the movement of President Trump’s supporters was stealth-edited after critics questioned the charged word.”

‘“Even aside from impeachment and 25th Amendment talk, Trump will be an ex-president in 13 days,’ ABC’s Rick Klein and MaryAlice Parks wrote for ‘The Note’ on Thursday. ‘The fact is that getting rid of Trump is the easy part. Cleansing the “movement” he commands, or getting rid of what he represents to so many Americans, is going to be something else.’”

“It now reads, ‘Cleaning up the movement he commands, or getting rid of what he represents to so many Americans, is going to be something else.’”

“Klein also shared the original phrase on Twitter before deleting it.”

“The term ‘cleansing’ drew criticism on the right, which viewed it as a violent term in a week where bipartisan outrage has erupted over the mob mayhem at the U.S. Capitol this week.”

‘“You may not like it, but it’s perfectly within Klein’s right to say everything he said,’ the Media Research Center’s Nick Kangadis wrote. ‘He can celebrate that Trump is leaving office all he wants. But it is the height of hypocrisy for those in the media to condemn others for violent acts that are dwarfed in comparison to the consistent violence of the far-left — one act doesn’t justify the other — and then go out and call for something like a ‘cleansing’ of people and think there’s nothing wrong with a statement like that.’”

Without a doubt, the capitol protest will be used as a vehicle to further attack Trump supporters and patriots in general.

Perhaps Klein and Parks would care to let us in on what their vision of “cleansing” might include?

The “playbooks” for “cleansing” are out there, and scattered throughout human history…, and they’re all ugly and evil.   

“Klein leads the network’s [ABC’s] political coverage and provides analysis across its platforms.”

“ABC,’ of course, stands for American Broadcasting Company. 

I propose a better choice would be DNBC!

I’ll let you figure that out.  

And, finally…, when are many other people going to wake up and start figuring this out as well?

Do African Americans think they’re going to be included in this grand scheme?

Do Hispanic Americans think they’re going to be included in this grand scheme?

Does any other group, other than white liberal elites, think they’re going to be included in this grand scheme?

I hate to break it to you, but you won’t be.

These other groups are just being used as a means to an end, and when their usefulness has reached an end, they’ll need to be “cleansed” or discarded too.

Mark my words.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑