Tag: politics

Iryna Zarutska was Sentenced to Death by Our “Justice System.”

Yes, Iryna Zarutska was sentenced to death by our so-called “Justice System,” but it could have been anybody, just sitting there, minding their own business on that train, or on a bus, or eating at a restaurant, or walking down the street, or…, well, you get the picture.

This piece of human garbage had no business being out and about amongst the innocent people of this community, just trying to live their lives, with the most modest expectations of the ability to do so.

I’ve written about this type of injustice before, and it’s sad we have to deal with this again, and again, and again, and again…

The Same 327 People Arrested 6,000 Times in NYC?!
UNBELIEVABLE…, AGAIN!!!
“We’re as mad as hell, and we’re not going to take this anymore!!!”
“Which way did he go, George…, which way did he go?!”
Why are these liberal, sanctuary mayors so intent on making sure dangerous illegal immigrants are released back out into their communities?
Chicago’s a “sanctuary” city?

Like I said, I’ve written about these types of injustices before.

Many other articles will be written about this, but most won’t address the real problem.

The real problem is democrats. Democrats and their policies.

Their evil policies.

This is an attack of evil people on good and innocent people.

Let’s just be clear that it’s basically a battle of good versus evil. 

Regarding this specific case, Sneha Kumari for India Times News writes a good article and asks the right questions:

“Who is Decarlos Brown Jr.? 14 arrests, mental illness and a violent past—why was he free before killing Iryna Zarutska?”

“Decarlos Brown Jr., a 34-year-old with a long history of violent crimes and diagnosed schizophrenia, was arrested for the fatal stabbing of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska. Despite 14 prior arrests and alarming behavior, he remained free due to systemic failures, raising serious concerns about public safety and mental health oversight.”

And please be aware that records show there are over 800 other individuals walking around free in the Charlotte area that have more prior arrests (20, 30, 40, and even 50 and more) than DeCarlos Brown.

It’s scary, and this situation is only multiplied hundreds and hundreds of times in communities across the country.

“The brutal killing of Iryna Zarutska has sent shockwaves through the Charlotte community and beyond, raising urgent questions about public safety and the protection of vulnerable individuals seeking refuge. Just 23 years old, Zarutska had escaped the horrors of war in Ukraine in search of peace and security in the United States. Instead, her life was tragically cut short in a horrifying act of violence aboard a Charlotte light rail train, where she was fatally stabbed. Following this, shocking new video footage has surfaced on the internet, revealing the terrifying moments before and after the attack. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police have arrested Decarlos Brown Jr, a known career criminal, in connection with the murder, but who is he, and why was he released after being in jail 14 times?”

“According to the surveillance footage, after Zarutska clutched her throat and collapsed into her seat, Decarlos Brown Jr. calmly walked through the train car, removed his sweatshirt, and stood near the doors. Other passengers began to take notice as blood was seen dripping from him, slowly realizing the severity of what had just occurred.”

“According to officials, Brown exited at the next stop, where a knife was later recovered. However, the disturbing visuals have sparked public outrage and renewed calls for stronger safety measures on public transportation systems.”

“Decarlos Brown Jr., is currently a homeless man who has a lengthy criminal history that includes charges such as larceny, armed robbery, and making threats, as per WSOC-TV. He previously served a five-year prison sentence for armed robbery. Earlier this year, in January, Brown was arrested again after allegedly misusing the 911 emergency system during a welfare check.”

“Despite a long and violent criminal record, 34-year-old Decarlos Brown Jr. was repeatedly released back into the community. As reported by the New York Post, Brown assaulted his own sister just months after being released from prison.”

“Court records reveal a disturbing pattern, showing that Brown has spent much of his adult life in and out of jail since 2011. His extensive rap sheet includes serious charges such as felony larceny, robbery with a dangerous weapon, and making criminal threats, raising serious concerns about how someone with such a history remained free despite the escalating severity of his offences.”

Ali Abbas Ahmadi, for BBC News, reports that, “The suspect’s mother, who didn’t want to be identified, told local news outlet WSOC-TV that she believes the attack could have been prevented.”

She understood her son was not well and should not have been released.

“North Carolina Representative Brenden Jones, a Republican, wrote on X that Ms Zarutska’s death ‘is the result of decades of Democrat DAs and Sheriffs putting their woke agendas above public safety. Violent criminals commit crimes with impunity, while families live in fear.’”

“Republican Florida Congressman Randy Fine said he would ‘introduce legislation to hold judges accountable when violent repeat offenders they release commit new crimes.’”

”’Those 12+ judges that released Decarlos Brown Jr should have their day in court too,’ he added.”

Yes, they should be held responsible for their actions.

And, in addition, it is very simple: dangerous individuals need to be locked away to protect the rest of us.

I’m not concerned about their rights or rehabilitation.

I’m concerned about their current and future victims.  

People say crime is not a political issue, but, I’m sorry, it is.

The simple truth is that democrats have a lot of blood on their hands.

If you’re a democrat, you have blood on your hands.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

Democrats proclaim, “Black Lives Matter!” Really?

Seriously?

Really?

Most recently, Illinois Governor J. B. Pritzker, and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, have been fighting to keep federal crime assistance, offered by President Trump, out of Chicago.

These “concerned” politicians prefer the status quo, which was 58 people shot and 8 killed over the Labor Day weekend, and dozens shot and killed over any other normal weekend, not to mention those shot and killed during the week!

Black communities bear the brunt of these shootings and killings.

But Pritzker and Johnson say crime statistics are improving, and they don’t want, or need help.

What do you think the families and friends of the hundreds of people who have been shot, and the families and friends of the hundreds of people in Chicago would have to say about that?

Pritzker and Johnson call on their democrat friends to “stand up and fight” against “federal occupation,” and to “defend the land” against President Trump.

Really?

Again, these “concerned” politicians prefer 58 people shot and 8 killed over the Labor Day weekend, and dozens shot and killed over any other normal weekend, not to mention those shot and killed during the week, and expect the people of Chicago to follow suit?

Since when did sacrificing the lives of these people to criminals on a daily basis become acceptable, and become the norm?

I believe the sane residents of Chicago would beg to differ.

So, do these democrat politicians still believe black lives matter?

I would ask, “matter” in what way exactly, because these black lives don’t seem to be worth saving in their eyes.

In case you don’t believe my premise of black lives being effected the most by this senseless crime in Chicago, in an article from April 12, 2022, for The Heritage Foundation, Giancarlo Canaparo and Abby Kassal ask, “Who Suffers the Most from the Crime Wave?”

“African Americans bear an increasingly large share of the harm from crime.”

“The spike in crime is hurting a lot of people, and black communities bear the heaviest burden.”

“Violent crime, like the price of gas, is rising. Not everyone is experiencing this crime wave in the same way. For some, it’s a distant issue experienced by other people somewhere else. For others, it’s a daily life-threatening concern.”

“We parsed the FBI’s crime data from 2011 to 2020 (the most recent data available) and found that African Americans bear an increasingly large share of the harm from crime. African American offenders, meanwhile, are committing an increasingly large share of violent crimes.”

“For other racial groups, the numbers are either decreasing (in the case of both white victims and offenders), increasing by much smaller amounts, or holding constant.”

“According to federal crime data, the number of violent crimes has increased by almost 50% over the last 10 years. In 2011, the FBI reported 314,907 violent offenses. In 2020, there were 640,836.”

“The most striking figure in the data is the spike in reported homicides, which tripled from 3,549 offenses in 2011 to 10,440 offenses in 2020.”

“The picture that federal crime data provide is bad, but the reality of crime in the United States is even worse. The FBI’s data is not complete. It relies on local law enforcement agencies across the country to voluntarily share their local data with the FBI. Not all do.”

Or, the data is manipulated, ala Washington D.C., to make it seem better than it really is.  

“Although the National Incident-Based Reporting System is not complete, it provides useful insights into who suffers from and who commits crime because it tracks demographic data about both sets of people.”

“We utilized the FBI’s crime data to compare victim statistics to determine which groups have been most impacted by the rise in violent crime. Factoring out the cases in which the race of the victim was unknown, we calculated who has borne the brunt of the crime wave.”

“For this analysis, violent crime includes assault, homicide, and sex offenses. We found that the increase in these crimes has fallen hardest on black people.”

“The most significant changes, therefore, were that black people represent an increasing share of violent crime victims…”

“The true size of the problem is made starker when we consider that African Americans make up only 14.2% of the total population (including multiracial populations who identify as black “in combination” with another race), but 32.7% of all violent crime victims and 54.4% of homicide victims. Thus, these small percentages represent an enormous problem that, for black people, is getting worse, both in relative and absolute terms.”

Regardless…, the spike in crime is hurting a lot of people, and black communities bear the heaviest burden.

Democrats across the country oppose President Trump’s desire to make our cities safer places to live and work. The democrats prefer to fight for the rights criminals and ignore the devastating impact crime is having on their constituents.

How these democrats keep winning elections in our big cities is beyond me.

I guess, in the end, you get what you deserve, but President Trump is determined to improve the lives of the people in these big democrat run cities, whether they appreciate it or not.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

The Swamp was Swilling Taxpayer Money like Pigs at the Trough!

Yes, my friends. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has revealed a virtual unending amount of waste and abuse of our taxpayer dollars by these swamp monsters and their anti-America socialist piglets everywhere.

To the tune of billions and billions and billions of our taxpayer dollars.

In the simplest of terms, innumerable (mostly democrat) parasites have been stealing our money.

When I hear the DOGE team describe just some of their findings it literally makes me sick.

Imagine, if you will, thousands and thousands of “wolves of Wall Street” partying on our dime like it was 1999.

They had absolutely no respect for the people they were supposed to be working for, or any sense of accountability for the money they had no problem squandering away. 

It’s no wonder the democrats are all up in arms over President Trump, Elon Musk, and the DOGE team.

These people are like crack addicts who have been forced to go cold turkey, with the added worry of possibly being held legally accountable for their years, even decades, of theft and abuse.

This explains why they’re willing to fund as many protests as it takes, while expending political capital left and right, regardless of popular opinion.

Congressman Craig Goldman, of Texas, posted the following on his website:

“Alongside President Donald Trump, I am committed to eliminating wasteful and fraudulent federal government spending. With over $36 trillion in national debt, reckless government overspending must end. I have put together a non-exhaustive list of taxpayer dollars spent under the Biden administration. This list has been identified through the incredible work of the White House, executive agencies, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and my colleagues in the U.S. Congress. I will be updating this tracker regularly to show how taxpayer dollars were poorly spent.”

“The list below includes taxpayer dollars channeled through agencies such as the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), U.S. Department of State (DOS), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Inter-American Foundation (IAF), National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. African Development Foundation (USADF), and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).”

The following is just a list of DOGE’s initial findings.

“$22,600,000,000 (HHS) – Aiding illegal migrants through resettlement programs, home and car purchases, and loans

$7,500,000,000 (DOT) – Funding a few dozen electric vehicle stations across the nation

$7,000,000,000 (EPA) – Funding green energy projects that reduce greenhouse gases and promoting the adoption of green alternatives nationwide

$5,000,000,000 (EPA) – Funding green energy projects that reduce gas emissions and supporting green banks

$2,000,000,000 (EPA) – Funding projects to decarbonize American housing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

$382,000,000 (DOL) – Issuing fraudulent unemployment payments to tens of thousands of individuals, including those with birthdates in the future, infants, and people listed as 115 years old

$312,000,000 (SBA) – Providing business loans for children 11 years old and under

$59,000,000 (FEMA) – Supplying services and housing for illegal immigrants in New York City

$46,500,000 (DOS) – Funding projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil

$43,300,000 (USAID) – Supporting programs to build an inclusive and capable workforce, with a special emphasis on public health and climate change sectors in Egypt

$35,900,000 (USAID) – Funding positive youth experience in Gaza

$31,000,000 (USAID) – Supporting the transition to clean energy with energy supplies in Europe and Eurasia

$26,300,000 (USAID) – Supporting higher education in Egypt

$24,000,000 (USAID) – Promoting “resilient livelihoods” in Gaza

$17,500,000 (USAID) – Supporting male circumcision and condom programs

$17,300,000 (USAID) – Providing the Diversity and Inclusion Scholarship Program to students in Burma

$13,200,000 (USAID) – Supporting biodiversity programs in Liberia

$12,200,000 (DOL) – Promoting worker empowerment in South America

$11,000,000 (USAID) – Producing the Middle Eastern version of Sesame Street in Iraq

$10,300,000 (USAID) – Supporting male circumcision programs in Mozambique

$9,000,000 (USAID) – Stolen humanitarian aid by Al-Qaida-affiliated terrorists

$8,300,000 (USAID) – Building worker power for equity and justice

$8,300,000 (USAID) – Funding USAID education on equity and inclusion

$8,000,000 (EPA) – Funding an organization to address environmental and energy justice issues

$6,200,000 (NIH) – Studying the effects of asthma on transgender individuals in the U.S.

$6,000,000 (DOD) – Funding the University of Montana to “strengthen American democracy by bridging divides”

$6,000,000 (DOD) – Funding a grant to decarbonize emissions from Navy ships

$5,900,000 (NIH) – Funding for a TransHealthGUIDE for gender-diverse young adults

$5,700,000 (DOS) – Supporting programs for LGBTQ+ individuals in Latin America and the Caribbean

$5,200,000 (DOD) – Funding a grant to diversify the Navy

$5,100,000 (NIH) – Testing the effects of cross-sex hormone therapy on transgender individuals in the U.S.

$4,900,000 (USAID) – Funding youth programs with a focus on reproductive health and the intersection of youth and gender equity

$4,700,000 (DOL) – Promoting international labor standards in Ecuador

$4,000,000 (EPA) – Building a one-room museum inside the EPA

$3,500,000 (DOD) – Supporting DEI groups through the Defense Human Resources Activity

$3,300,000 (DOD) – Unionized health workers in the Department of Defense’s Defense Health Agency spent $3,300,000 and 87,000 hours doing union-related work instead of their federal jobs

$2,900,000 (NIH) – Studying HIV prevention for transgender women and their male partners

$2,500,000 (NIH) – Studying the impact of structural racism on the health of older gay men

$2,500,000 (USAID) – Supporting green energy businesses in Vietnam

$2,000,000 (USAID) – Supporting gender-affirming healthcare and LGBTQ+ advocacy in Guatemala

$1,900,000 (DOD) – Providing holistic diversity, equity, and inclusion transformation and training for the Air Force

$1,600,000 (NIH) – Testing the reproductive health of transgender individuals in the U.S.

$1,600,000 (DOD) – Funding a University of Florida study on the “social and institutional detriments of vulnerability and resilience to climate hazards in [the] African Sahel.”

$1,500,000 (USAID) – Promoting DEI business policies and LGBTQ+ entrepreneurship in Serbia

$1,200,000 (USAID) – Funding choice, equity, and sustainability programs

$910,000 (NIH) – Testing the effects of “gender-affirming” hormone therapy on the immune system in the U.S.

$900,000 (IAF) – Supporting alpaca farming in Peru

$755,000 (NIH) – Testing the effects of “gender-affirming” hormone therapy on bone development in the U.S.

$731,000 (IAF) – Improving the commercial viability of mushroom and pea farming in Guatemala

$677,000 (IAF) – Promoting fruit and jam sales in Honduras

$600,000 (USDA) – Supporting a study on the menstrual cycles in transgender men

$599,000 (NIH) – Testing the risk of breast cancer for transgender men in the U.S.

$483,000 (IAF) – Supporting the production of artisanal salt in Ecuador

$400,000 (DOS) – Supporting LGBTQ+ sensitivity trainings for police forces in Nigeria

$374,000 (USDA) – Hiring a DEI onboarding specialist at the USDA

$325,000 (HHS) – Adapting LGB+ teen pregnancy prevention program for transgender boys

$323,000 (IAF) – Promoting cultural support for Venezuelan migrants in Brazil

$300,000 (DOS) – Promoting acceptance for LGBTQ+ people in Botswana

$298,000 (USDA) – Promoting international development for underrepresented communities

$246,000 (USADF) _ Funding mango drying facilities in the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire

$239,000 (USADF) – Promoting pineapple juice in Benin

$229,000 (USDA) – Hiring a Brazilian forest and gender consultant at the USDA

$229,000 (USADF) – Funding the promotion of 100% organic shea butter in Burkina Faso

$209,000 (DOS) – Funding an international study trip on LGBTQ+ advocacy

$185,000 (DOS) – Promoting the empowerment of lesbian and bisexual women in Belize

$99,500 (USADF) – Supporting increased production of yogurt in Uganda

$84,000 (USADF) – Supporting a business incubator for spa and wellness entrepreneurs in Nigeria

$70,000 (DOS) – Producing a DEI music event in Ireland

$68,000 (DOS) – Funding dance class workshops in China

$32,000 (DOS) – Creating an LGBTQ+ comic book in Peru

$29,000 (USDA) – Hiring a Central American gender assessment consultant at the USDA

$25,000 (DOS) – Funding a transgender opera in Colombia”

A stunning list, isn’t it?

And please understand that most of the money listed here never made it to the idiotic funding listed, but was either rerouted or kicked back to a long list of corrupt swamp monsters.

Nor does this even include the immense fraud uncovered at the IRS, Medicare, and Medicaid.

Thank God for President Trump.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

If you’re a democrat, the question is why?

If any of you democrats out there would care to reply in a comment for all of us to read, that would be nice, but I’m not going to hold my breath waiting.

But again, if you’re a democrat, the honest question is why?

Is the right to kill babies, wherever and whenever you want, really that much of a priority for you?

Is the allowance of illegal, unvetted, immigrants coming into our country, by the millions and millions, not to mention the millions of illegals that are coming across our border that we have no idea of who they are, is such a good idea in your mind?

Is the virtually unchecked allowance of fentanyl and countless other harmful drugs that are killing people in our country every day acceptable to you?

Maybe it’s taking away women’s rights that had been fought for so long, and handing those rights over to transgender males that appeals to you.

Or could it be the weaponization of the FBI and the “justice” system against anyone who challenges the democrats’ narrative and control that pulls you towards the democrat party?

Or perhaps you are endeared with handing billions and billions of our tax dollars over to foreign countries that don’t even particularly like us?

Or could it be you support the hate being demonstrated against the Jewish people in our country, ala Nazi Germany, and calling for the death of all Israelis and the end of Israel? Is that it?

No, I know what it is! You prefer paying like 25% more for everything, while also paying for the student loans for America hating liberal punks, as well as footing the bill to support the millions and millions of illegal immigrants we now have in our country, thanks to Lyin’ Biden and the rest of the democrats.

Maybe you believe we should go back to the horse and buggy days, while coughing up trillions of dollars in a futile attempt to curtail a perceived climate change?

Or could it be you’re worried about the end of “democracy” if Donald Trump is elected? But you don’t see the current actions by the democrats that are putting an end to democracy in our country?

No, no, I know what it is. You are pleased with the “defund the police” policies, and the collection of do nothing liberal DAs, and all of the lawlessness that is being allowed to thrive in our country.

It may be you don’t feel like you’re paying enough taxes and you’d like to pay more.

Or could it be you think it’s a good idea for drag queens to perform for very young students, and for them to promote deviant sexual behavior to them? Who are the parents who sit there and watch this disgusting display, by the way? Are these the suburban women who support Lyin’ Biden that I hear about?

I know, you’re a closet pedophile and you support Biden’s and the democrats’ sex trafficking of children across the southern border. You do realize the Biden administration has “lost track” of over 80,000 children it has allowed into our country over the last three years, don’t you?

You have an uncontrollable desire to wear a mask 24/7?

Like I asked before, if you’re a democrat, the question is why?

If you really do consider yourself a democrat, aren’t you the least bit ashamed?

If you aren’t, you really should be.

Just sayin’.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

Who do we become as we get older?

Who do “they” want us to become?   

Excuse me for being a little introspective today, but I recently heard this song again by Supertramp, and it made me think.

Here are the words to the song. What do you think?

“When I was young, it seemed that life was so wonderful

A miracle, oh, it was beautiful, magical

And all the birds in the trees, well they’d be singing so happily

Oh, joyfully, oh, playfully watching me

But then they sent me away to teach me how to be sensible

Logical, oh, responsible, practical

Then they showed me a world where I could be so dependable

Oh, clinical, oh, intellectual, cynical

There are times when all the world’s asleep

The questions run too deep

For such a simple man

Won’t you please, please tell me what we’ve learned?

I know it sounds absurd

Please tell me who I am

I said, now, watch what you say, they’ll be calling you a radical

A liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal

Oh, won’t you sign up your name? We’d like to feel you’re acceptable

Respectable, oh, presentable, a vegetable

But at night, when all the world’s asleep

The questions run so deep

For such a simple man…”

Life is really fairly simple.

But there are those that love to complicate things for their own benefit. “Those” being the government, elected and unelected, and “the haves.” These people are just interested in protecting their positions, power, and wealth.   

Once we get to a certain age, we don’t have the luxury of being so care free anymore. We have responsibilities, and we are just trying to survive, and give ourselves and our families the best lives we can.

Most of us just want to feel safe and comfortable, but it seems that is too much to ask for now. “They” just can’t help themselves from demanding more, and more, until they ruin it for everyone, including themselves.

And, please be aware about the line that says “they’ll be calling you a liberal,” that conservatives are really the new “liberals,” while the democrats are all about being “the man” now.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

Instead of stepping down, Biden doubles down.

Before I get started, I want to give my wife credit for this title. Nice one, Honey.

While we waited for “president” Biden to come out for his unscheduled press conference last Thursday night, my wife and I speculated what our fearless leader was going to say, given that earlier in the day the special counsel released their findings about their look into Biden’s handling of classified documents as a Senator, a vice president, a private citizen, and finally as president.

Would Biden say he had decided not to run for re-election?

Would Biden say he has decided to step down?

Glenn Thrush for The New York Times reported, “While Mr. Hur decided not to prosecute Mr. Biden, 81, [Did anyone ever actually think he would be prosecuted?] some of the reasoning he cited for his decision immediately created a new political crisis for the White House. In recounting his interviews with the president, Mr. Hur portrayed him as unable to remember key dates of his time in the Obama White House, or even precisely when his son Beau had died.”

“‘Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview with him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,’ Mr. Hur wrote.”

Is that really a thing? This is how they decide to prosecute people, or not, who have committed a crime(s)?

“The inquiry found that the president had willfully retained material after finishing his term as vice president and had shared sensitive information with a ghostwriter.”

So, Biden and his crew could argue against Mr. Hur’s findings, but then wouldn’t they be arguing against the reason Mr. Hur chose not to prosecute Clueless Joe?

Can they have it both ways?

Sorry. Stupid question.

It is a bit of a conundrum, but not for this bunch.

Instead of coming out in his interview and calmly and coolly thanking the special prosecutor for choosing to not prosecute him, while begging to differ on his cognitive assertions of him, he came out and attacked the special prosecutor and anyone else who questions his mental acuity, while then proceeding to confuse the President of Egypt with the President of Mexico.    

I have to tell you, after watching Tucker Carlson’s interview of Vladimir Putin, and watching him talk off the script for over two hours, and seeing what an intelligent and sharp man he is, Mr. Putin, along with along with all of the other leaders and people around the world, must be having a good laugh at “president” Biden, America, and her people. You and I.

Thanks again “president” Biden.     

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

Has anyone actually been charged with “insurrection” regarding January 6th?

The “insurrection” word gets thrown around ALL the time by democrats, but the truth is NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

Let me say that again.

NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

Although hundreds of Americans have been charged with various other crimes, regarding the events of January 6th, NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

Let me say that again.

NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

You may wonder how that could possibly be, and the answer is probably because it, in reality, was not an “insurrection,” at least by the protesters and rioters that have been targeted by The Department of inJustice.

Kaylee McGhee White, for The Washington Examiner writes, “Reminder: Not one person involved in Jan. 6 riot has been charged with ‘insurrection.’”

“For all the Democrats’ talk of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot being an ‘insurrection,’ it’s important to remember that not one person involved in the riot has been charged with that crime.”

“My colleague Jerry Dunleavy writes, ‘One year after the Capitol riot, no one has been charged with sedition or insurrection, despite initial Justice Department claims that such charges were likely and former President Donald Trump being impeached for allegedly inciting an insurrection.’”

“Surely, if the rioters’ actions were as seditious and Trump’s foolishness [their words, not mine] was as dangerous as Democrats have claimed, we’d be seeing criminal charges that reflect the seriousness of those alleged crimes. But that hasn’t happened.”

“According to the Justice Department, more than 225 defendants had been charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding law enforcement officers; at least 275 defendants have been charged with obstructing a congressional proceeding; and about 40 defendants have been charged with some sort of conspiracy charge.”

“But, again, no one has been charged with sedition or insurrection.”

Let me say that again.

NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

“Perhaps that’s why the vast majority of voters on both the Left and the Right don’t agree with Democrats’ characterization of the Capitol riot as an insurrection. A CBS News poll released this week found that 70% of the people who voted for President Joe Biden and 84% of the people who voted for Trump considered the Capitol riot to be a ‘protest that went too far.’”

Now we see multiple states attempting to keep President Trump off of this November’s ballot because he, according to their belief, “incited an insurrection” on January 6th.

The same January 6th where NOT ONE PERSON HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION REGARDING THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH, INCLUDING PRESIDENT TRUMP.  

In truth, President Trump offered to deploy 10,000 National Guard troops to the Capitol that day, but his offer was rejected by Pelosi, who as the Speaker of the House at the time, was in charge of Capitol security.

Now why would she do that?

The idea has been floated she denied troops to help with security because “it would not have been a good look.”

But the Capitol surrounded by fences and razor wire and troops after the fact was a good look?

In reality, I believe she did not want the troops there because they would have actually kept the protestors in line, which was contrary to what Pelosi, and her counterparts, the FBI, desired.  

It has been well documented that FBI operatives incited the protestors to march on and enter the Capitol building, and even assisted them with their entry.

All so Pelosi and the democrats could use this event to further their never ending parade of witch hunts against President Trump, and further promote their narrative of the evil MAGA contingency.  

And, why was Nancy Pelosi, who was responsible for Capitol security, never brought before the January 6th Committee to testify?   

I think we all know the answer to that question.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

Lies, Lies, and More Democrat Lies.

The democrats are demonstrating, again, that they have no shame, no level they won’t stoop to, and no lie they aren’t willing to tell to cover their tracks, or to promote their disingenuous positions and narratives.

The most recent examples are the false narratives surrounding this latest “border security” bill, and border security in general.

We are hearing claims from “President” Biden that he needs this latest border bill, or something like it, to help him secure the border.

Lie.

In truth, the border was very secure when he assumed office in 2021, and it was his executive actions on day one of his administration that opened the illegal immigrant floodgates. These actions could just as easily be reversed without any help from congress.

At a recent campaign event in South Carolina, Biden said Democrats and Republicans are “making real progress” on a bill that would include new border security measures.

“It would also give me, as president, the emergency authority to shut down the border until it can get back under control,” Biden said at South Carolina’s “First in the Nation” dinner. “If that bill were the law today, I’d shut down the border right now and fix it quickly.”

Lies, lies, and more lies.

The truth is, expecting the creator of the problem to fix the problem they created is insanity.

In addition, the president, any president, already has the emergency authority to close down the border, if they really want to.

The democrats have now actually resorted to blaming former President Trump for our border woes, and the complicit mainstream media is more than happy to allow them to perpetrate these lies without challenging anything they claim.

Hopefully people will more and more begin to believe their own lying eyes, and hold the democrats accountable for their anti-American policies.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

Is Joe “Santa Ana” Biden Going to Attack “The New Alamo?”

Treasonous “President” Joe Biden has given the state of Texas until today (Friday, 1/26/2024) to back down and allow the federal border guard access to the border there at Shelby Park, in Eagle Pass, Texas.

Or what, Traitorous Joe?

And according to Blake Hanson, for Fox News 4, “Texas leaders refuse to give feds access to Shelby Park amid border standoff.”

I am proposing that Shelby Park, there in Eagle Pass, Texas, be referred to as “The New Alamo,” “The Alamo 2,” “The Alamo Part 2”, or perhaps “The Alamo 2024.”

“Top Texas officials say they will not comply with a deadline to allow federal border agents access to a park along the Rio Grande.”

“The tensions between the state and federal government have led to some calls for the president to take control of the Texas National Guard.”

“The Federal government demanded its border agents get access to a park that is a high crossing area by Friday (today).

“It’s a small area on a big border but a symbol of a dispute between the state and feds that’s ramping up.”

“The state of Texas is adding more razor wire along the border even after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling paved the way for the feds to take it down.”

“Gov. Greg Abbott shared on Thursday why he thinks there’s constitutional backing for the state to do what it needs.”

‘“It was the states that created the United States,’ he said in a FOX News interview. ‘And when the states voted to create the United States and have a constitution, included in that agreement was the compact that the federal government would take care of the states.’”

Of course, “dictator wanna be” Joe never saw a federal law or constitutional law he felt obliged to follow.

But, former President Trump is the one constantly referred to as a threat to “democracy.”

The democrats and Clueless Joe just have no shame.

“The high court threw out a lower court decision, meaning federal agents can resume cutting razor wire. But Gov. Greg Abbott says the state will keep adding more wire, saying Texas’ constitutional right to defend itself outweighs federal law.”

‘“Regardless of what federal statute may exist, the supremacy clause means that the constitution itself is the supreme law of the land,’ Abbott said. ‘The constitution itself provides Texas with a right of self-defense, in this case, because the United States has abandoned its responsibility to defend Texas.’”

And, at this point, twenty-four other governors agree with Governor Abbott, and have joined Texas in their assertions against the federal government and Joe “Santa Ana” Biden.

(Antonio López de Santa Anna was the Mexican President who led the attack(s) against The Alamo, during the Texas Revolution in 1836.)

Stand by. This could get very interesting.

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

Impeach Joe Biden now!!!

Let me start out by saying we don’t need an “official” impeachment inquiry.

And we don’t need all of these hearings and investigations into Joe Biden’s obvious corruptness.

We don’t need to tie this check to that account, or that money to this person.

We just really need to stop playing these legislative games, which it seems, only republicans feel obligated to observe.  

All we have to do is bring attention to the unquestionable “high crimes and misdemeanors” conducted by Joseph R. Biden and his cast of treasonists, regarding the colossal mess he has created on our southern border, and go from there.

But, what exactly are “high crimes and misdemeanors?”

According to Madeleine Carlisle, for Time Magazine, reporting regarding the impending impeachment of then President Donald Trump at the time, “The House of Representatives voted in favor of two articles of impeachment — accusations of abusing the power of his office and obstructing Congress’s investigation into his relationship with Ukraine — that Democrats argue fall under the umbrella of ‘high crimes and misdemeanors.’”

“According to the U.S. Constitution, a President can be impeached for committing ‘Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.’ Treason and bribery are relatively clear, but what exactly are ‘high crimes and misdemeanors?’ The answer, it turns out, is complicated, and has been evolving for hundreds of years.”

“The phrase ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’ appears in Article II section 4 of the U.S. Constitution.”

“There are currently two major legal disputes over the definition of ‘high crimes and misdemeanors.’ The first is whether or not something in that category actually has to be a crime. Frank Bowman, a law professor at the University of Missouri School of Law and the author of High Crimes & Misdemeanors: A History of Impeachment for the Age of Trump, tells TIME he believes it doesn’t. ‘The defenders of the impeached officer always argue, always, that a crime is required,’ he says. ‘And every time that misconception has to be knocked down again.’”

“He offers this example: ‘Let’s say the President were to wake up tomorrow morning and says, “All this impeachment stuff is kind of getting on my nerves. I think I’m going to go to Barbados for six months. Don’t call me, I’ll call you,” and just cuts off all contact and refuses to do his duty,’ Bowman theorizes. ‘That’s not a crime. It’s not violating a law. But could we impeach him? Of course we could — otherwise what’s the remedy? We have a country without a President.’”

“What’s the Constitutional history of the term?”

“The concept of impeachment was used by the British Parliament as early as 1376, as a legislative safeguard against overreach by the aristocracy, and the terms in question were part of the process early on.”

‘“In England a lot of the impeachment cases had relied on this language of “high crimes and misdemeanors” from the 1640s onward,’ Bernadette Meyler, a law professor at Stanford Law School, explains.”

“But the phrase didn’t have a set definition in British practice; it was used to describe whatever thing the person was being impeached for, according to Bowman. There were several things for which people were impeached during this era: ordinary crimes, treason, corruption, abuse of power, ordinary incompetence and misbehavior in relation to foreign policy.”

“When the framers of the U.S. Constitution realized they needed a way to remove executive officials who abused the nature of their positions, they decided to add a definition for an impeachable offense. Though many suggestions were made at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, by the end of the summer they’d winnowed it down to two examples: treason and bribery.”

“But George Mason of Virginia took issue with limiting it to the two definitions, arguing they were too narrow. At the same time the Constitution was being drafted, newspapers were covering the impeachment of a statesman named Warren Hastings for misconduct during his time the Governor General of India. Mason pointed out that under their current definition, Hasting wouldn’t be impeachable. Mason suggest they broaden the definition to include ‘maladministration,’ meaning mismanagement or ineffective governance. James Madison argued back that the word would be too broad, and make it so the President would be serving at the ‘pleasure of the Senate.’ He worried Senators could remove the President if they disliked a policy move.”

“George Mason then proposed including the phrase ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’ instead, and that’s the term they settled on.”

“To understand what the framers thought ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’ meant, Harvard Law professor Jennifer Taub points to Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist Paper No. 65, in which he explains the impeachment process. ‘The subjects of its jurisdiction are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust,’ Hamilton wrote in 1788.”

Soooo, a “high crime” is just a term deemed to recognize something negative a person of power is capable of doing, which the typical person isn’t even in the position to do, or even capable of doing.

It’s a “high crime.”

It’s a special kind of crime.

So, again, we don’t need an “official” impeachment inquiry.

And we don’t need all of these hearings and investigations into Joe Biden’s obvious corruptness.

We don’t need to tie this check to that account, or that money to this person.

We just really need to stop playing these legislative games, which it seems, only republicans feel obligated to observe. 

All we have to do is bring attention to the unquestionable “high crimes and misdemeanors” conducted by Joseph R. Biden and his cast of treasonists, and go from there.

This is exactly what Colorado Representative, Lauren Boebert, did on 06/13/2023, when she introduced House Resolution 503, to impeach Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.   

The latest action by the House, regarding this resolution, was to refer it to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement. 

Submitted articles of impeachment:

ARTICLE I: ABUSE OF POWER

The Constitution provides that the House of Representatives “shall have the sole Power of Impeachment” and that the President of the United States “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”. In his conduct as President of the United States—and in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of the President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed—Joseph R. Biden, Jr., has abused the powers of the office of the President of the United States, in that:

Using the powers of his high office, President Biden has knowingly presided over an executive branch that has continuously, overtly, and consistently violated Federal immigration law by pursuing an aggressive, open-borders agenda by purposefully and knowingly releasing more than 2,000,000 illegal aliens into the interior of the United States without the intention or ability to ensure that they appear in immigration court to face asylum or deportation proceedings.

President Biden has intentionally facilitated a complete and total invasion at the southern border. President Biden ended the Migrant Protection Protocols to require aliens seeking asylum to remain in Mexico while being processed by the Department of Homeland Security. President Biden has closed Department of Homeland Security detention facilities and refused to cooperate with State and local law enforcement officials in securing the border. He has allowed illegal aliens to enter the United States as asylum seekers despite knowing they did not qualify for asylum. President Biden has pursued this open-border agenda purposefully and willfully, circumventing every safeguard, check, and balance required by law, resulting in mass illegal immigration into the United States, to the detriment of the American people.

President Biden, with such conduct, has demonstrated a failure to uphold Federal immigration law, violating his oath to the Constitution if allowed to remain in office, and has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with the rule of law and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

Wherefore, President Biden, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

ARTICLE II: DERELICTION OF DUTY

The Constitution provides that the House of Representatives “shall have the sole Power of Impeachment” and that the President of the United States “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”. In his conduct as President of the United States—and in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of the President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed—Joseph R. Biden, Jr., has neglected the constitutional duty of the office of the President of the United States, in that:

Neglecting the powers of his high office, President Biden has abandoned his duties to ensure that the laws are faithfully executed and upheld, by presiding over an executive branch that has continually, overtly, and consistently refused to enforce the Nation’s immigration laws and secure the southern border. President Biden has endangered the security of the United States and the health and safety of the American people. President Biden has caused a national security crisis and is endangering the lives of the American people.

President Biden has presided over the largest influx of illegal immigrants in American history, and as evidence of his dereliction, the deportation cases pursued by his administration are at historic lows. President Biden’s negligence of duty has resulted in the surrender of operational control of the border to the complete and total control of foreign, criminal cartels—putting the lives of American citizens in jeopardy. On President Biden’s watch, illegal aliens have been processed and released into the interior of the country under a mass system of parole, contrary to the clear terms of Federal immigration law. Utilizing the “CBP ONE” program, the executive branch will release nearly 40,000 illegal aliens per month into the United States. He has failed to uphold the mandatory detention and deportation provisions of immigration laws, resulting in the mass entry of inadmissible aliens and the continued presence of deportable aliens. Through this complete and total dereliction of duty and extreme absence in oversight of his own administration’s policies, President Biden has allowed more than 1,500,000 illegal immigrants to invade the southern border. On Joe Biden’s watch, illicit fentanyl has killed more than 100,000 American citizens. In fiscal year 2023, U.S. Customs and Border Patrol seized more than 9,000 pounds of fentanyl at the southern border.

In his failure to uphold the rule of law, President Biden has demonstrated that he will neglect his duty to execute the office to which he has been entrusted, violating his oath to the Constitution if allowed to remain in office, and has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with his constitutional duty to take care that the laws of the United States be faithfully executed.

Wherefore, President Biden, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

I believe that about sums it up.

If these aren’t the clearest, and most valid, reasons to impeach Joseph Biden, I really don’t know what would be.

Can someone please explain to me what the House Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement is doing with this referral?

Can someone please explain to me what our Speaker of the House is doing with this proposal?

Does anyone in Washington D.C. give a damn about our country anymore, save a handful of patriotic conservative House representatives?!

We don’t have time for political games anymore.

Who can reasonably argue against Biden’s “high crimes,” as laid out by Representative Boebert?

IMPEACH JOE BIDEN NOW!

IMPEACH JOE BIDEN NOW!!

IMPEACH JOE BIDEN NOW!!!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment.   I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

0

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑