What are we left with if we ban anything that bothers anyone?

The answer is a paralyzed hot mess.

A “free” society is not a society that is worried about an individual’s feelings above all else.

A “free” society is a society which allows and tolerates everybody’s beliefs and feelings.

anyt 14

That being said, according to Brian Flood of Fox News, “The New York Times says airing the national anthem on TV could trigger viewers who hear ‘political overtones.’”

“Trigger?”

“Political overtones?”

anyt 5

Are we getting “political overtones” confused with patriotic overtones?

What is “political” about hearing and/or seeing the national anthem unless you’re anti-American?

anyt 13

“The New York Times ‘poo-pooed’ the long-standing tradition of television stations airing The Star-Spangled Banner because some night owl viewers could be offended by the ‘politically charged’ national anthem.”

Wait…, what?

The New York Times “poo-pooed?”

Well, like I said, they are creating a “hot mess” after all.

Again…, if you’re “offended” by the national anthem and consider it “politically charged,” then you’re probably either a very confused liberal…, someone here illegally in the first place…, or you are an enemy of our country…, and in any case I’m glad you’re offended.

anyt 4

“The piece, written by culture reporter Julia Jacobs, is headlined ‘Local TV Revives a Bygone Tradition: Airing the National Anthem,’ and declares that the song can ‘be a dividing line’ for some Americans.”

anyt 1

“Culture reporter?”  Why, how snooty and pretentious of you!

“The Times [Ms. Jacobs] noted that ‘one of popular culture’s generational divides’ is whether or not you are old enough to remember the days when ‘The Star-Spangled Banner’ aired on television stations. The national anthem was historically played late at night, going back to the advent of television, typically amid visuals of patriotic imagery before the station signed off until the next morning.”

Oh really?

THIS is a generational divide of our culture?

I hardly think so, seeing that most of the people under 30 don’t even watch what us older folk would consider TV per se.  They watch things on their TV, but they don’t watch typical TV channel broadcasts, or even satellite or cable for that matter.

‘“Now, the early morning hours are filled with rebroadcasts and infomercials, eliminating any practical reason for a formal sign off,’ the Times [Ms. Jacobs] wrote.”

What kind of imbecile has nothing better to worry about than whether they’re playing the national anthem on TV at 4:00 AM in the morning or not?

That’s really digging deep to promote your anti-American ways!

anyt 2

“Some stations have revived the tradition but the Times wrote that some viewers ‘might hear political overtones’ as a result. Gray Television, CBS and Nexstar Media Group have led the way, with the National Anthem now played on more than 350 stations across America, according to the Times.”

‘“The decision to revive the anthem tradition comes at a time when overt allegiance to The Star-Spangled Banner has become one of the lines that separate blue and red America,’ the Times reporter wrote.”

Why say “blue and red?”  Why not say liberals and conservatives, or democrats and republicans?

Let’s not be afraid to name those who are overtly anti-America and those who are overtly pro-America.

Let’s draw a clear line and let people choose what side they’re on.

anyt 6

“Author, Tim Young asks, ‘Should it shock anyone at this point that the New York Times is trying to get people to be outraged at the airing of the National Anthem?’”

anyt 12

‘“It’s inspiring that local news is returning our National Anthem to an important place in our culture.  It’s astonishing that The Times would see that as a bad thing,’ Media Research Center vice president Dan Gainor told Fox News. ‘But if you pay close attention to the story, the paper admits that the left, including journalists, doesn’t like the national anthem.  That shows exactly who and what they really are.’”

Yes it does, Mr. Gainor…, yes it does.

“The paper admits that television executives haven’t heard many complaints and feedback has been ‘overwhelmingly positive,’ but that tidbit is buried roughly 1,400 words into the story.”

anyt 9

“Political satirist and author Tim Young told Fox News that this story “truly reveals the mindset” of the Gray Lady [“the Gray Lady” is a nickname for The New York Times newspaper].”

‘“Should it shock anyone at this point that the New York Times is trying to get people to be outraged at the airing of the national anthem? Their piece is written as if viewers should be skeptical of every element of the song and accompanying video,’ Young said. ‘They don’t like America and its anthem and they want you to dislike it as well.’”

anyt 11

“In the span of a week, the Washington Post calls a terrorist psychopath a ‘religious scholar’ and the Times is upset about the national anthem being played. These are supposed to be America’s top two news publications, and they seemingly hate America.”

anyt 10

What if I said I find The New York Times and The Washington Post offensive?

Would they maintain their integrity and shut down the publication of their newspapers?

Of course not.

People who find liberal speech or actions offensive are dismissed out of hand and ignored by the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media.”

In this fascist, liberal socialist world, they are promoting, the arbiters of what is deemed offensive are the ones who wield the power.

And “they…,” “the ones…,” would be the anti-Americans…, the liberals…, the democrats.

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

CNN exposed as propaganda arm for the democrats!

Brian Flood of Fox News reports, “CNN ‘whistleblower’ claims network is ‘pumping out propaganda.’

Like I’ve said before, one good “whistleblower” deserves another!

“Tweeeeet!”

averitas 2

averitas 1

“According to ‘Project Veritas [Veritas meaning ‘truth’],’ a conservative activist group…, undercover recordings made by an alleged ‘whistleblower’ capture CNN employees casually confirming the network’s anti-Trump bias and show company president Jeff Zucker telling top news executives to focus solely on impeachment even at the expense of other important news, according to the conservative activist group that posted the bombshell footage online.”

averitas 4

“Project Veritas, whose founder, James O’Keefe, describes himself as a ‘guerrilla journalist’ — built up the release on social media with an ‘#ExposeCNN’ hashtag, and Monday published the first segment of what is billed as a multi-part series. The video features Cary Poarch, who claims he was a satellite uplink technician at CNN’s Washington Bureau before, he says, his ‘dream job’ quickly turned into a nightmare due to CNN’s blatant bias.”

“Poarch allegedly recorded ‘several’ of Zucker’s conference calls, in which he claims Zucker runs the daily meeting ‘with an iron fist’ aimed directly at ‘hammering Trump’ or ‘Republicans in general.’ Poarch told O’Keefe that several high-powered CNN executives join Zucker on the daily call, including senior vice president of newsgathering Virginia Moseley and political director David Chalian.”

averitas 5

“Zucker is also heard telling staff to call out Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and encouraging CNN on-air personalities to attack Fox News.”

“In the clip, Poarch said he decided to wear a hidden camera because of CNN’s perceived bias, and that he secretly recorded Zucker’s 9 a.m. rundown conference call because the network was ‘pumping out propaganda.’”

“It’s basically me wanting the news to be what they used to be — news — and not infotainment or a game show or chasing the ratings,” Poarch told O’Keefe. “CNN purports it to be facts first and that’s clearly not the case.

averitas 6

averitas 8

“I noticed after… that there was a strong group-think that permeated through the halls and that everyone was on board the ‘I hate Trump Train.’”

“The video also showed someone identified as a CNN media coordinator Nick Neville being secretly recorded.  ‘Jeff Zucker, basically the president of CNN, has a personal vendetta against Trump… it’s not gonna be positive for Trump. [Zucker] hates him. He’s going to be negative,’ the person identified as Neville said in the highly edited video.”

averitas 11

“CNN did not immediately respond to a request for comment.”

That’s odd…, NOT!

For the followers and readers of MrEricksonRules, none of this comes as a surprise.

All the Veritas Project is doing is confirming for us what we already knew:  That CNN is a propaganda arm for the democrats, an enemy of The President and an enemy of the American people.

Press your “Ctrl” key and “click” on the link below to watch the Project Veritas hidden camera footage from inside CNN (part 1).

https://youtu.be/m7XZmugtLv4

WINNING!

averitas 10

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

“Stupid is as stupid does…,” and stupid is as stupid says as well, regarding these crazy, double-talking democrats!

By definition, a “lynching” is “a mob killing someone, especially by hanging, for an alleged offense with or without a legal trial.”

According to Joseph A. Wulfsohn of Fox News, “President Trump draws fire for calling impeachment inquiry ‘a lynching.’”

bidenlynch 8

I’m sorry Mr. Wulfson, but isn’t your headline a little redundant?

I mean, is there anything The President has said that didn’t “draw fire” from democrats and their partners in crime, the fake news media?

bidenlynch 1

Anyway…, moving on…

“[President] Trump’s ‘lynching’ tweet provokes strong reactions; chief White House correspondent John Roberts reports.”

“[President] Trump was widely criticized for claiming on Twitter that Republicans are witnessing a ‘lynching.’ Several 2020 Democrats piled on the president, including the 2020 frontrunner.”

bidenlynch 10

So all of these liberals are denying President Trump the right to identify as someone who is being lynched?

Just sayin’.

By definition, I would have to say that President Trump’s remarks, about the democrats’ attempt to impeach him being a “lynching,” are exactly on the mark.

The democrats are trying “to kill” his reputation and presidency, without actually voting to begin the impeachment process, while holding secret witness hearings, without allowing The President’s defense team to defend him or cross examine the witnesses, which is without precedent.

This is most definitely unfair to say the least, and most probably unconstitutional and illegal.

The word “lynching” does not have to carry racist undertones with it.  The definition of “lynching,” according to Merriam-Webster, makes no mention of slaves, slavery, Blacks, or African-Americans in its definition at all. Democrats just want us to perceive it that way, as they do, through their racially divisive lenses.

Many people, of all races, cultures and religions, in our country’s past, have been lynched while being accused of committing various crimes.

bidenlynch 20

‘“Impeachment is not “lynching,” it is part of our Constitution,’ [former Vice President and 2020 democrat presidential candidate] Joe Biden reacted. ‘Our country has a dark, shameful history with lynching, and to even think about making this comparison is abhorrent.  It’s despicable.’”

Okay…, everyone take note now…, “Sleepy” Joe says, “Making this comparison [impeachment to lynching] is abhorrent.  It’s despicable.”

bidenlynch 6

“However, CNN unearthed an interview Biden did on the network in 1998, where he used the term he blasted Trump for.”

Way to go CNN!

Holding a democrats’ feet to the fire is not like you at all!  “Sleepy, creepy Uncle” Joe must be falling out of favor among the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” and the fascist liberal powers that be.

bidenlynch 2

‘“Even if the president should be impeached, history will question whether or not this was a partisan lynching or whether or not it was something that in fact met the standard,’ then-Sen. Biden told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, ‘the very high bar that was set by the founders as to what constituted an impeachable offense.’”

“Abhorrent…, despicable!!!”  In your own words, “Sleepy” Joe.

“Stupid is as stupid does…,” and stupid is as stupid says as well, regarding these crazy, double-talking democrats!

“As his unearthed remarks went viral, Biden offered an apology … but continued to hammer Trump by insisting he ‘chose his words deliberately.’”

Please note that only democrats are allowed to “issue an apology” and be absolved of their sins.

‘“This wasn’t the right word to use and I’m sorry about that,’ Biden tweeted. ‘Trump on the other hand chose his words deliberately today in his use of the word lynching and continues to stoke racial divides in this country daily.’”

Excuse me…, what?

bidenlynch 3

Sooooo…, when President Trump speaks he “chooses his words deliberately,” but when you speak you don’t?

bidenlynch 4

How does that work exactly “Sleepy” Joe?

“Stupid is as stupid does…,” and stupid is as stupid says as well, regarding these crazy, double-talking democrats!

“Biden was one of several Democratic lawmakers who used the term ‘lynching’ in the past, including now-Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y, and Rep. Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y.”

bidenlynch 5

This, my friends, is what happens when misinformed and confused people elect other disingenuous and confused people.

Stay thirsty my friends…, but remember…, don’t drink the liberal Kool Aide!

bidenlynch 9

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

Here we go again with claims of “phantom” future evidence against The President!

ed 1

For over two years we heard from the democrats about how Robert “the clueless tool” Mueller was going to destroy President Trump.

They spent 30-40 million dollars, issued over 2,500 subpoenas, and came up with NOTHING!

NOTHING!

ed 5

ed 4

ed 6

We heard daily from the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” about all of this other evidence that was going to surface, which never did.  NOTHING!

NOTHING!

ed 7

ed 8

We heard regularly from “shifty” Adam Schiff, and how he had all of this evidence showing criminal activity against The President, which never managed to make an appearance.  NOTHING!

NOTHING!

ed 10

ed 2

Now we have another baseless, bogus investigation of The President and his call with the Ukrainian president, and we have another liberal liar, making libelous claims about supposed criminal activity, and referring to “evidence,” which in reality is nothing but wishful thinking.

According to Joshua Nelson of Fox News, “President Trump ‘committed a crime by soliciting the Ukraine government to get involved in the U.S. election,’ the former DNC Chairman and Pennsylvania Governor, ‘Mister Ed’ Rendell told ‘America’s Newsroom.’”

ed 3

Your level of confusion is impressive “Mister Ed!”

President Trump was referring to events that occurred prior to the 2016 election, not about events leading up to the 2020 election.

‘“I think we got to watch what rolls out in the next month or so. I think there’s more evidence to come and I think as the evidence rolls out, it’s going to become more and more clear that the president not only broke the law here but he abused his power at the detriment of the United States of America,’ Rendell said.”

Yes, “Mister Ed,” you do have to “watch what rolls out in the next month or so,” because that’s all you have to pin your hopes on!

NOTHING has managed to “roll out” so far!

NOTHING!

“I think as the evidence rolls out, it’s going to become more and more clear that the president not only broke the law here but he abused his power.”

WHERE, AND HOW MANY TIMES, HAVE WE HEARD THAT LINE BEFORE!!!

I swear…, the democrats must really think we’re all idiots.

They sure are sticking with the fascists’ playbook, however.

“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.” – Adolf Hitler

And…,

“Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty.” – Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Nazi Propaganda Minister

This is when the democrats typically roll out Ed Rendell…, when they want some “tool” or “party flunky” to regurgitate the latest liberal narrative, and keep “the lie” alive.

‘“There is not a trace of evidence that the Bidens did anything wrong and in my judgment — and I was district attorney for eight years — the president committed a crime,’ he [Rendell] said.”

OHHHH, NOOOO!

Joe Biden didn’t do anything wrong, except come out and say he did EXACTLY what the democrats are accusing President Trump of doing…, which he didn’t do!

Unbelievable.

“Your judgement,” Mr. Rendell, is about as valuable as a ticket to that failed Bill and Hillary Clinton show, which they ended up giving tickets away to, and then actually paid people to go in order to save some face.

ed12

Nothing at all like a Trump rally, hey Hill?

ed 13

On a related note…, “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., called [‘Shifty’ Adam] Schiff a ‘patriot.’”

The first question that comes to mind is a “patriot” for what country?  The People’s Republic of California?  Certainly not The United States of America.

ed 11

“The intelligence committee chairman [‘Shifty’ Adam Schiff] has admitted he should have been clearer about his contact with the ‘whistleblower’ who filed a complaint about Trump’s July phone call with the Ukrainian president.”

Which really means he should have been more careful so as not to have been caught!

“Schiff [then] recited what he later called a ‘parody’ reading of ‘the call’ at a House hearing, drawing harsh criticism from Republicans.”

ed 9

This “parody,” as he now calls his comments before a congressional hearing, were never prefaced as such.  We were led to believe Schiff was quoting what the President had said on the call.  That was until The President released an actual transcript of the call, forcing “Shifty” Adam Schiff to eat his words.

Words must not have many calories…, because Congressman Schiff has been eating a lot of his words lately…, and yet he is still so skinny!

WINNING!

ed 15

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

“Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty.” – Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister

Yes my friends…, it’s true…, the democrats have adopted this Nazi strategy…, along with others.

accuse 1

If you stand back and objectively view what is going on in American politics…, it’s hard to deny that the democrats have morphed into a sick,  “new Nazi party,” with the propagandistic mainstream media as their partners is crime.

accuse 3

accuse 12

The democrats, of course, in keeping with their strategy, attempt to attach the “Nazi” moniker to the conservatives, and label President Trump as “Hitler.”

During the 2016 election, the democrats questioned whether the conservatives and Donald Trump would accept the results of the presidential election.

We now see that the democrats are the ones unwilling to accept the results of the 2016 election.

accuse 15

Donald Trump is accused of “Russian collusion,” and hounded about this for over two years.

We now see that it was Hillary Clinton and the rest of the democrats who colluded with Russia. It was the Clinton campaign that financed the phony Russian dossier.

Obama

Donald Trump is accused of “rigging” the 2016 election.

We now see that it was Hillary Clinton, the Obama administration, and the democrats who attempted to “rig” the election.  The Trump campaign was spied on by the very people who should have been protecting the campaign.

We have also learned how the liberals at Google and Facebook attempted to influence the election by directing users to pro-democrat sites and anti-conservative sites.

accuse 9

The President’s spokesperson, Kellyanne Conway is accused of violating The Hatch Act, which is a law designed to prohibit employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president, vice president, and certain designated high-level officials, from engaging in foreign discussions and negotiations independent of the government and its policy.  This was a baseless accusation.

We see these disingenuous charges as we see former Obama Secretary of State, John Kerry, in discussions with the leaders of Iran for some unknown reason, in violation of the Logan Act. The Logan Act is a United States federal law that criminalizes negotiation by unauthorized persons with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States. The intent behind the Act is to prevent unauthorized negotiations from undermining the government’s position.

accuse 17

accuse 16

Donald Trump is accused of obstruction of justice.

We now know that various members of the Obama administration (his DOJ, FBI and CIA) basically tried to establish a coup to take down the newly, and duly, elected President of the United States.

accuse 19

We saw the Obama administration illegally use the phony Russian dossier as a basis for obtaining FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign.

accuse 14

We also saw Obama Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, meet with former President Bill Clinton in order to get Hillary off the hook for her shady and illegal email handling.

accuse 13

Donald Trump is accused of illegal dealings with Ukraine…, by someone who apparently has no direct knowledge of what supposedly occurred here.  How does that work, and what the hell does that mean?  This “twice removed whistle blower” is now apparently going to testify before Congress.  Isn’t hearsay inadmissible?

We now learn it was Joe Biden and the Obama administration who had the corrupt dealings with Ukraine.

“Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty,” then sit back and let the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” take over…, focusing on the democrats’ charges, while basically ignoring and covering-up the democrats’ sins.

It is somewhat effective with those who aren’t really paying attention…, and those who choose to look the other way.

What will be the next false accusation?

And the false accusation after that?

Keep your eyes open.  We have over a whole year to go until the 2020 elections.

The “fake news,” liberal propaganda has only begun to hit the fan!

accuse 10

This is what the “Occupy Democrats” posted when Barack Obama was President. I wonder if they would apply the same beliefs where President trump is concerned?

figs 4

accuse 4

accuse 7

accuse 6

accuse 5

accuse 2

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

“Racism” is as “Racism” does.

By definition, racism is prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based solely on their race.

If we’re honest, we have to admit that we see racists in action all day every day…, but President Trump isn’t one of them!

divide 4

Liberal commentators, democrat politicians and liberal propagandist “journalists” tend to view everything through a racial prism.

divide 1

They see racism in EVERYTHING, and they promote racism in all they do, and then they have no problem at all calling everyone but themselves a racist.

divide 12

They are predisposed to a racist perspective.

It’s the unapologetic liberal agenda.

“Do as I say, not as I do.”

“Think as I think, or anything is fair game against you.”

“White people can only be critical of other white people.”

“People of color can only be criticized by other people of color, and only liberal people of color at that.”

According to Heather Mac Donald of The Wall Street Journal, “President Trump’s political opponents have accused him of sowing ‘division’ with his ‘racist language.’ Mr. Trump ‘exploits race,’ ‘uses race for his gain,’ is engaged in a ‘racially divisive reprise’ of his 2016 campaign, stokes ‘racial resentments,’ and puts ‘race at the fore,’ the New York Times has reported over the past several months.”

“Yet Mr. Trump rarely uses racial categories in his speech or his tweets.”

It’s all a liberal propagandist fairy tale.

divide 9

Ask them to give you examples and direct quotes of President Trump’s terribly racist remarks and they will quickly dodge, deflect and try to derail the entire conversation.

Ms. Mac Donald reminds us that, “It is the media and Democratic leaders who routinely characterize individuals and groups by race and issue race-based denunciations of large parts of the American polity [society].”

divide 10

“Some examples: ‘As race dominates the political conversation, 10 white Democratic candidates will take the stage’ (the Washington Post); Mr. Trump’s rally audiences are ‘overwhelmingly white’ (multiple sources); your son’s ‘whiteness is what protects him from not being shot’ by the police (Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand ); white candidates need to be conscious of ‘white privilege’ (South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg ); ‘white supremacy manifests itself’ in the criminal-justice, immigration and health-care systems ( Sen. Cory Booker ); ‘ Michael Brown was murdered by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri’ ( Sen. Elizabeth Warren ); whiteness is ‘the very core’ of Mr. Trump’s power, whereas his ‘predecessors made their way to high office through the passive power of whiteness’ (Ta-Nehisi Coates in The Atlantic).”

divide 11

divide 8

“Liberal opinion deems such rhetoric fair comment, even obvious truth, not ‘racially divisive.’”

In the liberal mind, it’s okay to be racially divisive if you’re attacking anyone who’s conservative.

White conservatives are labeled “white supremacists,” Black conservatives are labeled “Uncle Toms,” and Latinos, Asians and anyone else are just plain ignored.

divide 6

These are the standard operating procedures for the liberals, democrats, socialists and fascists of today.

divide 7

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Who exactly are the “real domestic terrorists?”

Frank Figliuzzi, a former FBI official and current MSNBC and NBC News contributor, has compared Trump supporters to a “terrorist organization.”

Well, is that so, Frank?

Mr. “former FBI official.”

And there isn’t a democrat standing who seems to have a problem with his characterization of these tens of millions of American citizens who are Trump supporters.

figs 1

Well, Mr. Fig-li-uz-zi…, answer me this:

What group’s political representatives are calling for the verbal and physical harassment of others who don’t agree with them?

figs 5

What group condones the violent actions and attacks of the fascist group ANTIFA (who are themselves members of this group)?

figs 6

figs 5

What group openly encourages others to break the laws of our country?

What group openly encourages immigrants to illegally enter our country?

What group wants to subsidize these illegals in our country?

In addition…, this group wants to take money (our tax money) away from actual citizens of our country, who should come first, in order to subsidize these illegal immigrants.

What group wants to disarm the law abiding citizens of our country…, putting its citizens at the mercy of those who would seek to harm us?

What group utilizes “fake news,” and deliberate misinformation when disseminating their liberal propaganda?

What group demonizes, harasses and attacks our police officers, immigration officers and border patrol officers?

Would you agree, Mr. Fig-li-uz-zi, that these would all be considered terroristic traits?

How could you not agree…, I mean being a “former FBI official” and all?

I’ll give you a hint Mr. Fig-li-uz-zi…, “Trump supporters” IS NOT the correct answer to ANY of these questions.

The correct answer to all of these questions would be LIBERALS or DEMOCRATS.

You would be infinitely more correct if you were to compare the democrats in our country to a “terrorist organization.”

Just sayin’.

figs 4

figs 2

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

 

 

C’mon New York Times!  You’re letting the news get in the way of the party line propaganda!

Gerren Keith Gaynor of Fox News reports that, “New York Times headline of Trump’s remarks on mass shootings ignites backlash.”

“A New York Times headline about President Trump’s remarks on the recent mass shootings in El Paso and Dayton drew condemnation online– including some Democratic presidential candidates– and was subsequently changed late Monday.”

nyt 11

They changed their headline?

Wow!  That never happens.  That headline must have been pretty vile or grossly inaccurate.

What exactly was the headline?

“The newspaper summarized Trump’s comments, in which he denounced hate and white supremacy, with the headline “Trump Urges Unity vs. Racism” on the front page of its first edition.”

Huh?

That was the headline they were forced to change?

That headline was completely accurate and unbiased.  That was exactly what occurred.  President Trump urged for unity against racism, denouncing hate and white supremacy groups.

And therein lies the problem.

How can the democrats’ fairy tale narrative of The President being a racist be true if he is reported as being against racism and denouncing hate and white supremacy groups?

C’mon New York Times!

Get with the program!

Did you forget you’re a propaganda rag that works in concert with the democrats?!

nyt 8

It seems that in a moment of weakness you actually reported “the news” there.

Shame on you!

“A photograph of Tuesday’s first edition was tweeted out by journalist Nate Silver Monday night and was quickly slammed by critics who accused The Gray Lady of inaccurately representing Trump’s comments.”

“The Gray Lady?”

More like “Gray Lady Down!”

nyt 9

“Some Twitter users threatened to cancel their subscriptions and urged others to do the same.”

Really?!

Did you know that “some twitter users” can be found to be doing virtually anything?

Anyway…, I digress.

‘“I canceled my subscription,’ tweeted author and CNN contributor Joan Walsh, adding, ‘I can’t keep rewarding such awful news judgement.’”

Let’s get one thing clear…, Joan Walsh is a liar.  She didn’t cancel anything.  And by “awful news judgment” she means diverting from the “fake news,” liberal narrative.  She is associated with CNN after all.

nyt 4

“Prominent Democrats in Washington also took aim at the Times, including New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.”

‘“Let this front page serve as a reminder of how white supremacy is aided by – and often relies upon – the cowardice of mainstream institutions,’ the freshman congresswoman tweeted.”

What?

Please explain to me how “white supremacy is aided” by reporting that The President is calling for unity against racism and white supremacy groups?

nyt 3

These democrats are sooo confused and sooo disingenuous that it is almost beyond commenting on.

nyt 1

“Presidential candidates, many of whom blamed Trump’s rhetoric for the El Paso, Texas, shooting that left at least 22 dead, also decried the headline.”

“New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand tweeted, ‘That’s not what happened.’”

No, Kirsten…, that IS exactly what happened.

‘“Lives literally depend on you doing better, NYT. Please do,’ wrote Sen. Cory Booker.”

Thank you for your take on the matter “Spartacus!”

I believe we all can “do better…,” including you Cory.

“A photograph of the Times’ second edition of the front page hours later revealed that the headline had been changed to ‘Assailing Hate but Not Guns.’ Its website also showed a similar headline: ‘Trump Condemns Bigotry but Doesn’t Call for Major New Guns Laws.’”

nyt 6

I’m surprised these new headlines were even deemed acceptable.

There is a negative twist to them now, but there is still a bit of positivity there about The President.

“Times spokeswoman Eileen Murphy acknowledged in a statement the original headline was problematic.”

“Problematic?”

The headline was “problematic,” but it wasn’t inaccurate, huh?

‘“The original headline was flawed and was changed for all editions of the paper following the first edition,’ the statement read. ‘The headline in question never appeared online, only in the first print edition.’”

The headline was “problematic” and “flawed,” but it wasn’t inaccurate?

Gee…, that reaction to the original headline would seem to be a metaphor for the democrats and their co-conspirators, the mainstream media!

“Problematic” and “flawed.”

nyt 7

nyt 2

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

John “the weasel,” “the rat,” “the snitch,” the squealer,” “the stool pigeon,” “the tattletale,” “the back-stabber,” “the double-crosser,” “Judas” Dean is back and getting a little attention from our pathetic democrats in Congress.

According to David Montanaro of Fox News, “Former Nixon White House counsel John Dean said Monday, after testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, that he is ‘honored’ to be considered an enemy by President Trump.”

He’s “honored to be considered an enemy” of the President of the United States.

dean 1

That makes him an enemy of the state, doesn’t it?

That makes him a subversive, doesn’t it?

That may even make him a traitor, does it not?

Well…, it’s not too far of a leap from being a “Judas” or a “double-crosser” to being a traitor.

‘“I think he was disbarred and he went to prison.  Other than that, he’s doing a great job,’ Trump said Monday afternoon.”

Ha!

Joe diGenova, a former US Attorney for the District of Columbia and an Independent Counsel, and now a contributor at Fox News added, “As many have pointed out, Dean is a convicted felon who was disbarred following his criminal role in the Watergate scandal. More important for this farce of a hearing, though, is that Dean has absolutely no first-hand knowledge of the events in question. He’s no more qualified to testify about Russiagate than CNN’s Jim Acosta is to testify about real news.”

“Dean has become a liberal activist since getting out of jail, publishing no fewer than four books blasting Republicans, including one in which he called for President George W. Bush to be impeached long before Donald Trump even announced his run for president.”

So he didn’t have any problems with Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton or Barack Obama at all, but Ronald Reagan, The Bushes, and President Trump were and are “threats” to our country?

“Dean, a CNN contributor (So he isn’t biased at all!), was asked by Anderson Cooper about Trump attacking him as a ‘loser for many years’ and a ‘sleazebag attorney.’”

dean 3

‘“Well, I’m honored to be on his enemies list,’ Dean responded. ‘I was able to make Nixon’s at the end, and so I’m pleased that I’m on Trump’s given my feelings about the threat he is to this country.’”

Remember…, when these liberals refer to the “country,” they really mean “the swamp.” The really mean the establishment politicians and bureaucrats who are only concerned with their own backsides and the rest of the country be damned.

‘“One of the reasons that I did what I did back during Watergate was the thought that this will never happen again. And one of the reasons I’ve had a knot in my stomach, one of the reasons I’m on CNN is because I’m deeply troubled by the presidency we’re living with,’ he said.”

Yes…, please…, try and justify to us again why you flipped on your boss and snitched him out.

dean 6

News flash…, Watergate was 45 years ago!  45 years ago!  Nobody cares anymore!  Most of the people in this country were not even born yet when John “the loser” Dean was spilling his guts, to save his own backside, on live TV every day.

dean 4

Oh, and John…, you have a “knot” in your stomach because that’s what happens to nervous little weasels, like yourself…, you get scared…, because deep down…, not even too deep down…, you’re just a liberal chicken sh%t who wants some attention and any validation he can get.

“Dean was hammered by House Republicans on the Judiciary Committee Monday. At one point, the hearing room broke out into laughter, as Florida Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz grilled Dean for turning Nixon comparisons into a profitable ‘cottage industry’ for himself.”

“Dean assisted with the Watergate cover up and pleaded guilty to obstruction before becoming a key prosecution witness.”

Maybe Mr. Dean could really put his expertise to work and predict for us who will become the new “John Dean,” regarding the current investigation of the investigators at the FBI and the DOJ.  Which of these weasels going to start singing to save their own backsides, ala John “the weasel” Dean?  Peter Strzok?  Andrew McCabe?  Bruce Ohr?  Lisa Page?  It’s hard to predict because there are so many rats to choose from.

dean 5

In summary, “… outside of Dean’s fantasy land, there is no similarity [between the phony Russian collusion scandal and Watergate]. In Watergate, there were real underlying crimes. Operatives linked to the Nixon Campaign committed numerous felonies as they broke into the Democratic National Committee’s headquarters in the Watergate Hotel.”

“After that, genuine obstruction of justice took place, committed in large part by the Democrats’ own star witness, then-White House Counsel John Dean, who physically destroyed evidence as part of the cover-up.”

“In ‘Russiagate,’ however, there was no underlying crime. There was only the Democrat fantasy, cooked up by the Hillary Clinton campaign, that the Trump Campaign had ‘colluded’ with Russians to steal the 2016 election. That was a lie, as the Mueller report conclusively established.”

“There was also no obstruction of justice. Given that the president knew all along that he was innocent, nothing he did could possibly have constituted the ‘corrupt intent’ necessary for an obstruction charge.”

And that, as they say folks, is that.

dean 2

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑