What you talkin’ ‘bout, Germany?

According to Mark Moore of The New York Post, “President Trump last week directed the Pentagon to cut the number of US troops stationed in Germany by 9,500, removing about a quarter of the forces in the country.

There are currently about 40,000 US troops in Germany.

“A top German official said it was ‘unacceptable’ — and could impact the longstanding relationship between the NATO allies.”

agermans 1

‘“This is completely unacceptable, especially since nobody in Washington thought about informing its NATO ally Germany in advance,’ Peter Beyer, an ally of Chancellor Angela Merkel, told the Rheinische Post newspaper, according to Reuters.”

agermans 7

“Beyer, Germany’s coordinator of trans-Atlantic cooperation [That’s a real job?], told the DPA news agency that ‘the German-US relationship could be severely affected by such a decision from the US president.’”

So, I guess Peter Beyer isn’t doing his job very well then.

And “unacceptable?”

What exactly are you going to do about it…, stop exporting cars over here?

Oooooh…, we’re scared.

“A senior administration official told the Wall Street Journal that internal discussions have been ongoing since September, adding that yanking the troops has nothing to do with Merkel’s decision not to attend the G-7 meeting in Washington this summer.”

“Merkel’s government said Monday it still has heard no official word from Washington.”

‘“As of this hour, there is no official confirmation by the appropriate authorities in the United States whether these plans will really be carried out or not,’ Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer told reporters in Berlin, according to Bloomberg News. ‘We’re only aware of the information that is in the press.’”

“German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas characterized the relationship between Berlin and Washington as ‘complicated.’”

The relationship is only viewed as “complicated” by your country, Germany, Mr. Maas.

agermans 10

To the US, it’s really very simple Mr. Maas…, pay your dues and be loyal to your friends.

‘“We appreciate the cooperation with the U.S. armed forces that has grown over decades. It is in the interest of both of our countries,’ Maas told the German newspaper Bild, Reuters reported.”

Ya…, mostly in the interests of your country, Mr. Maas.

‘“We are close partners in the trans-Atlantic alliance. But it’s complicated,’ he said.”

We already discussed the whole “complicated thing, Mr. Maas…, it shouldn’t be complicated at all.

We had to kick German butt in World War I…,

agermans 2

…and then we had to go over there and do it again in World War II.

agermans 3

Germany has been extremely costly to America, in both lives and monetarily.

In retrospect, Germany is very lucky that there even is a Germany today!

agermans 4

agermans 5

Not only did we allow your country to continue to exist after World War II, we then rebuilt it for you.

Whatever we want to do regarding you or your country should be absolutely fine with you.

We really should not have to put up with any crap from you, now or ever, whatsoever.

So, why would President Trump be proposing we do this?

How about the fact that Germany just entered into a big new energy deal with Russia, who is NATO’s enemy, as well as the fact that Germany isn’t paying its NATO bills.

agermans 8

“[President] Trump has criticized NATO members for not paying enough of their fair share of defense, and Germany isn’t expected to hit its spending level until 2031.”

How convenient for them.

“During a July 2018 NATO meeting with Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg, [President] Trump questioned why the US protects Germany, ostensibly from Russia, while the country is involved in an energy deal with Russia?” ​

agermans 6

Good question, Mr. President.

‘“I think it’s very sad when Germany makes a massive oil and gas deal with Russia, where you’re supposed to be guarding against Russia​,​ and Germany goes out and pays billions and billions of dollars a year to Russia,’ [President] Trump ​told Stoltenberg. ‘So we’re protecting Germany, we’re protecting France, we’re protecting all of these countries. And then numerous of the countries go out and make a pipeline deal with Russia where they’re paying billions of dollars into the coffers of Russia.  I think that’s very inappropriate.’”

It seems pretty obvious to me too, Mr. President.

‘“​But Germany is totally controlled by Russia, because they will be getting from 60 to 70 percent of their energy from Russia and a new pipeline​,” [President] Trump said at the time.​”

And the US knows what it’s like to be dependent on other countries for its oil.

“Meanwhile, Poland hopes some of the US troops being pulled from Germany will be reassigned there.”

‘“I deeply hope that as a result of the many talks that we had … part of the troops based today in Germany which are being removed by the United States … will indeed come to Poland,’ Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki told private radio RMF24, Reuters reported. ‘The decision is now on the US side.’”

We appreciate your interest, Poland…, but we do really need to bring some of our troops back home.

Troops from the United States are currently deployed in more than 150 countries around the world, with approximately 170,000 of its active-duty personnel serving outside the United States and its territories.

Is this really necessary…, or is this just the US being too accommodating again?

Remember…, no good deed goes unpunished.

agermans 9

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

I see CNN has finally posted some news about the stock market! 

Yes folks, and if you see CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, The Huffington Post (HuffPost), The New York Times or The Washington Post reporting news about Wall Street, or the economy in general, it’s bad news.

acnn3 9

In this case, CNN Business’ David Goldman reports, “US stocks plummet on Coronavirus fears: March 9, 2020.  Dow falls 2,100 points.”

Well, that is definitely news Mr. Goldman…, but it was news too when the stock market hit record highs like over 30 times this last year.

It’s funny how I didn’t see any mention of those economic events.

I wonder why?

acnn3 3

CNN must be doubly excited about this news…, as their hyping of the coronavirus seems to be working and that in turn is causing negative economic news.

Please check out my previous blogs regarding the coronavirus:

You scared of the Coronavirus?  From March 3, 2020

https://mrericksonrules.com/2020/03/03/you-scared-of-the-coronavirus/

and,

Death toll hits 14,000!  But I’m not talking about the coronavirus. From March 9, 2020.

https://mrericksonrules.com/2020/03/09/death-toll-hits-14000-but-im-not-talking-about-the-coronavirus/

Another article out there by David Goldman today reports, “It’s a bad day to be an energy company.”

Wow…, two articles in one day!  Mr. Goldman must be extra charged up by all of this bad news!

acnn3 8

Goldman reports, ‘“The rapidly falling price of oil [due to an oil price war between Saudi Arabia and Russia] is likely to put more pressure on energy companies in the United States, which will hurt the banks with the most credit exposure to the oil industry,’ according to CFRA Research analyst Pauline Bell.”

Yes, Mr. Goldman…, again, this is definitely news.

But it was also news when President Trump pushed to open-up more areas for oil exploration and when he got all of the pipelines approved.  Not to mention when we gained our independence from Middle Eastern oil, and in fact, became the world’s number one producer of oil again!

Not to mention how low the price of gas has been for over three years now.

This “good stuff” was also news that I didn’t catch you or CNN reporting about, or even bothering to mention in most cases.

Again, I wonder why?

acnn3 7

Actually, I don’t “wonder why” at all.

I know very well why all of the liberal propaganda, fake news, shamelessly tries to manipulate the news.

It’s all in an effort to support their anti-Trump narrative.

acnn3 1

acnn3 5

It’s just amazing to me how many people are still falling for this fake news.

acnn3 4

acnn3 2

Just watch the fanfare (I’m being sarcastic) about the market bouncing back on the fake news today.

There won’t be any.

acnn3 6

acnn3 10

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Voting shenanigans are starting already!

Here we go!

According to Ronn Blitzer of Fox News, “Group threatens lawsuits over ‘suspiciously high’ voter registration rates in swing states.”

aabnorm 11

“Voters in Florida, Michigan and Colorado are threatening to sue their states after an independent organization discovered that each has counties with unusually high voter registration rates — in some cases, they found more registered voters than actual people eligible to vote.”

aabnorm 8

aabnorm 6

So, these democrats are so brazen and so stupid, they’re not even going to try and hide what they’re doing?

Again, “They found more registered voters than actual people eligible to vote!”

THEY FOUND MORE REGISTERED VOTERS THAN ACTUAL PEOPLE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This doesn’t happen by accident my friends!

There is no way of explaining this situation away with naturally occurring phenomenon.

THE DEMOCRATS ARE TRYING TO MANUFACTURE VOTES AND CHEAT HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But we’ll just keep hearing the hoax from the democrats about how the Russians are tampering with the election!

aabnorm 14

aabnorm 12

aabnorm 13

Thank God we have this independent organization checking this stuff out!

“The data was compiled by the Honest Elections Project, a new nonprofit organization that blames the seemingly implausible statistics on a failure of states to properly update voter rolls to account for people moving, dying or being incarcerated.”

“The group examined publicly available registration records and compared it with citizen voting-age data from the U.S. Census Bureau, describing the figures as ‘suspiciously high.’”

‘“All three states have multiple counties where voter registration rates exceed 90 percent, in some cases they exceed 100 percent.’”

‘“In the last election in 2018, the nationwide registration rate according to the U.S. Census Bureau was 66.9 percent. That disparity is a clear sign these states aren’t maintaining accurate voter rolls,’ said Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project. Snead was formerly a senior policy analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation.”

“Fox News reached out to each state’s secretary of state’s office, but none immediately responded.”

That’s odd.

“The organization’s findings revealed that 27 counties in Florida have voter registration rates above 90 percent, well above the national average, and seven counties with rates higher than 100 percent.”

“Michigan had 18 counties above 90 percent and one above 100 percent, and Colorado had 19 above 90 percent and five above 100 percent, the group said.”

aabnorm 5

“In the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton won Colorado by a relatively slim margin of 2.8 percent.  President Trump won Florida by 1.3 percent, and Michigan by just 0.4 percent.”

“The observations led voters in each state to warn their respective secretaries of state that keeping ineligible voters on the rolls leaves the states vulnerable to improper activity during November’s election. That warning came in the form of letters sent on their behalf from attorney William Consovoy, who has represented Trump in a number of matters.”

‘“Retaining voter rolls bloated with ineligible voters harms the electoral process, heightens the risk of electoral fraud, and undermines public confidence in elections,’ the letters said.”

Amen.

When that day comes that people have no confidence in our elections, the survival of our country will be in jeopardy.

aabnorm 7

“Consovoy noted that the National Voter Registration Act requires states to keep accurate voter rolls, and provides for individuals to notify their states and then sue if action is not taken within 90 days, which the voters intend to do if necessary.”

It says the “National Voter Registration Act requires states to keep accurate voter rolls.”

So what’s the federal penalty if it is found a state or states is not “keeping accurate voter rolls?”

‘“We ask that you establish, if one has not already been initiated, a comprehensive and nondiscriminatory list maintenance program in compliance with federal law,’ the letters each say. They call for the states to remove from their lists of voters everyone who is ineligible because they moved, died, were incarcerated or other reasons.”

“The voters also request that the states inform them of what measures they are taking to make these adjustments in time for November’s election.”

“The practice of removing names from voter rolls has led to intense controversy and legal battles in numerous states.”

Of course!

Getting the votes of all of these dead and imaginary people is the only way the democrats have a chance of defeating President Trump in 2020!

aabnorm 4

“A Wisconsin court [with an extremely liberal judge, of course] recently put that state’s voter roll purge on hold, as opponents argued the effort targeted voters in Democratic areas in a bid to suppress turnout.”

aabnorm 9

Excuse me…, but how does removing dead people, felons who are incarcerated and people who have moved, from the voter rolls, “suppress turnout?”

The only thing I see it suppressing is potential fraudulent votes.

“The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) says cleaning up voter rolls can be a responsible exercise but some states have used it as ‘a method of mass disenfranchisement, purging eligible voters from rolls for illegitimate reasons or based on inaccurate data, and often without adequate notice to the voters.’”

Hey ACLU…, have you ever heard the old saying that “Two wrongs don’t make a right?”

It’s a good saying…, and it’s true.

aabnorm 2

This is just the beginning my friends…, and you ain’t seen nothing yet!

 

Please check out my blog from August 7, 2018 for my solutions to all of our voter woes, titled:

“Voting is such sweet sorrow that I shall say ‘one vote per citizen’ till it be morrow.” ― Will Shakespeare (not to be confused with William Shakespeare)

https://mrericksonrules.com/2018/08/07/voting-is-such-sweet-sorrow-that-i-shall-say-one-vote-per-citizen-till-it-be-morrow-%e2%80%95-will-shakespeare-not-to-be-confused-with-william-shakespeare/

 

aabnorm 3

aabnorm 10

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Russian interference?!  Did you say “Russian interference” again?!  You did, you did say “Russian interference” again?! 

Is the fake news, liberal propaganda, really serious about this…, again?!

Really?!

It’s only February!

aelect 2

Please don’t tell me we are going to have to listen to this fairy tale garbage again for the next 9 months, leading up to the November election.

Please!

aelect 3

And then after President Trump wins it’ll be déjà vu all over again as well with this Russian crap…, again.

I guess our only hope is that CNN and MSNBC will have been completely discredited by that time and shut down.

According to Jim Acosta, Zachary Cohen, Dana Bash, Jeremy Herb, Jake Tapper, Alex Marquardt, Paul LeBlanc, Vivian Salama and Kaitlan Collins of CNN, “Russia is looking to help Trump win in 2020, election security official told lawmakers.”

aelect 4

Is there anyone at CNN who didn’t contribute to this piece of liberal propaganda?

Just sayin’!

“Washington (CNN) – The intelligence community’s top election security official delivered a briefing to lawmakers last week warning them that the intelligence community believes Russia is already taking steps to interfere in the 2020 election with the goal of helping President Donald Trump win, three sources familiar with the matter tell CNN.”

Okay, people…, time out.

Let’s stop for a minute and think about this.

Let’s stop for a minute and use our brains.

aelect 18

First, the fact that Russia wants to mess with our election is a given.  No news there at all.

But second…, you’re telling me that Russia wants to help President Trump get re-elected?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has the U.S.’s economy roaring?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has rebuilt America’s military to the strongest it’s been in our history and the strongest currently in the world?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has overseen the U.S. become oil independent from the Middle East?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has established a new branch of our military, The Space Force, which has been created to guarantee the U.S. has dominance in space over countries like Russia and China?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has placed embargos and other economic restrictions on them and many of their “friends” around the world?

That President Trump?

That’s the President Trump “The intelligence community’s top election security official” is talking about?

aelect 17

Excuse me Ms. “The intelligence community’s top election security official” if I call you out for what you obviously are…, just another liar and “deep state” tool who is being used to spread anti-Trump propaganda.

“Last week’s briefing, led by election security official Shelby Pierson and first reported by The New York Times, addressed the overall picture of Russia’s efforts, including hacking, weaponizing social media and attacks on election infrastructure, one of the sources said.”

aelect 1

“The briefers said Russia does favor Trump, but that helping Trump wasn’t the only thing they were trying to do as it was also designed to raise questions about the integrity of the elections process, the source added.”

And of course the democrats want to lay the groundwork about the “integrity of the election process” in order cover their butts and fit their narrative after the democrats get annihilated in the 2020 presidential and congressional elections.

Please refer to my section above again as to why the Russians would, of course, favor President Trump.

Acosta, Cohen, Bash and Herb of CNN continue, “Russia’s interference in the 2016 election — which the US intelligence community believes was aimed at boosting Trump’s candidacy and hurting his opponent, Hillary Clinton — led to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. The prospect of interference in 2020 will further test US defenses against foreign meddling, which Trump has repeatedly downplayed as he has dismissed any suggestion that Kremlin influence played a role in his election.”

aelect 14

Okay…, please, let’s take another time out here.

I’m sorry, but wasn’t the “Russian collusion hoax” been put to bed?

aelect 11

Wasn’t the fraudulently initiated Mueller investigation completed, after wasting two years of our time and coming up with NOTHING regarding President Trump and “Russian collusion?”

aelect 7

aelect 9

aelect 8

And again…, I’m sorry but wasn’t it President Obama who was aware of this “Russian election interference” in 2015 and 2016 but did nothing about it?

Wasn’t it President Obama and his deep state minions who were aware of this “Russian election interference” in 2015 and 2016 and failed to inform candidate Trump about it, but rather used it as an excuse to spy on his campaign and then frame him with the “Russian collusion hoax?”

Obama

Ha!  It’s funny how I never hear that mentioned by any of our “friends” in the fake news, liberal propaganda media.

Again…, let’s take a moment and use our brains here.

Wouldn’t it make more sense to believe that the Russians would be more inclined to “help” the democrats’ front runner, Bernie Sanders?

According to Joseph Simonson of The Washington Examiner, Bernie Sanders has been quoted as saying, ‘“I don’t mind people calling me a communist.’”

Hmmm…, well, that’s interesting.

“Although Sanders has refrained from self-identifying as a communist, his ties with far-left Marxist groups go back decades.”

Hmmm…, well, that’s interesting as well.

aelect 5

“The Washington Examiner reported last May on his ties with far-left political parties such as the Socialist Workers Party [SWP]. During his time as mayor of Burlington, Vermont, he littered his office with newspapers and pamphlets from revolutionary organizations.”

The Socialist Workers Party (SWP) is known as the communist party in the United States.

“In 1980 and 1984, Sanders endorsed SWP presidential candidates Andrew Pulley and Mel Mason. Their presidential platforms included promises to dismantle the entire U.S. military and nationalize most industries.”

Hmmm…, wouldn’t these be things Russia would be excited about getting behind as opposed to President Trump’s accomplishments and policies?

“Sanders was later investigated by the FBI concerning his ties to the SWP, although charges were never brought.”

aelect 20

As we know, charges are never brought against liberals, democrats, socialists and communists…, only conservatives.

And on a final note, according to Michael Kranish of The Washington Post, “The just-married socialist mayor from Vermont was on what he called “a very strange honeymoon,” an official 10-day [in 1988] visit to the communist country [Russia], and he was enthralled with the hospitality and the lessons that could be brought home.”

Just “enthralled!”

“The trip garnered brief mention in the 2016 presidential campaign, but earlier this year, a video from a Vermont community television station was posted online that showed a few minutes of Sanders’s unlikely celebration with the Soviets.”

“As he stood on Soviet soil, Sanders, then 46 years old, criticized the cost of housing and health care in the United States, while lauding the lower prices — but not the quality — of that available in the Soviet Union. Then, at a banquet attended by about 100 people, Sanders blasted the way the United States had intervened in other countries.”

“Sanders declined to be interviewed for this report.”

You don’t say?

I’m sure the fake news media will eventually make a Russia-Bernie connection in an effort to railroad Bernie out of their nomination process as well.

The liberal establishment is so predictably pathetic it’s laughable.

So, they’re going to be telling us the Russians are supporting both Bernie AND President Trump?

Like I said…, laughable and unbelievably shameless.

WINNING!

aelect 13

aelect 15

aelect 16

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

“You’re a useful idiot.” Joy Behar speaking to Tulsi Gabbard.

atulsi 8

“Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty.” – Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister.

atulsi 12

I’ll go along with the “idiot” part, regarding Joy Behar, but I wouldn’t say she’s particularly “useful.”

Sam Dorman of Fox News reported that, “Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, got into a testy exchange with “The View” co-host Joy Behar on Wednesday [during a show in October of 2019] as the 2020 candidate confronted Behar over her claim that she was a ‘useful idiot’ for the Russians.”

atulsi 9

This, of course, stemmed from Hillary Clinton’s outrageous claim that Tulsi Gabbard is being “groomed” as an “asset” by the Russians.

atulsi 10

We now know that Gabbard is accusing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton of deliberately spreading false accusations that Gabbard is a Russian asset in a lawsuit seeking upwards of $50 million in damages.

Good for you, Tulsi!

Hit her where it hurts most…, in her ill-gotten bank account!

And Joy Behar, of course, didn’t waste any time regurgitating and promoting Hillary’s idiocy.

atulsi 11

She may regret parroting Hillary in the end.  If Tulsi is successful in her suit against Clinton The View and Behar may be next!

Oh, be still my heart!

‘“Some of you have accused me of being a traitor to my country, a Russian asset, a Trojan horse, or a “useful idiot” I think was the term that you used, [which basically means that I am naive or lack intelligence].” Gabbard told Behar.”

‘“Well, useful,’ Behar said. ‘But that’s a Russian term, they use that,’ she added.”

So Joy Behar is implying that her feelings that she is an “idiot” still stand.

Joy Behar is also seemingly implying that she is some sort of an expert regarding the Russians and the Russian language.

Neither of which is true, of course.

She, Joy Behar, is the real idiot here.

atulsi 1

“After Gabbard defended herself, Behar cited compliments of Gabbard that she saw as objectionable.”

‘“Franklin Graham finds you refreshing. He doesn’t find me refreshing. Richard Spencer, the white nationalist leader, says he could vote for you,’ she said.”

Franklin Graham notwithstanding, who on God’s green Earth could ever say they find you, Joy Behar, “refreshing?!”

atulsi 7

“Gabbard laughed and responded: ‘This is why I’m here — because you and other people continue to spread these innuendos that have nothing to do with who I am.’”

“She went on to accuse Behar of doubling down on ‘baseless accusations’ that former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton appeared to make about Gabbard. Clinton previously claimed that Gabbard was being ‘groomed’ by the Russians to be a third-party candidate and was an ‘asset’ of the Kremlin.”

We have all come to realize that it was Hillary Clinton who became an “asset of the Kremlin,” regarding policy, favors, and the transfer of U.S. uranium to the Russians.

‘“I’m a soldier — because of the attacks on 9/11,’ Gabbard said. ‘I enlisted in the military to go after and defeat and destroy the evil that visited us on that day. I’ve served now for over 16 years. I deployed twice to the Middle East during the height of the war where every single day I saw firsthand the terribly high human cost. It’s why I ran for Congress.’”

Matt Wilstein of The Daily Beast website says, “The 2020 Democratic candidate [Tulsi Gabbard] lashed out at ‘The View’ host for echoing Hillary Clinton: ‘That is extremely offensive to me and to every woman of color.’”

Wilstein echoes that, “In an attempt to ‘set the record straight,’ Gabbard defended herself as a ‘patriot’ and a ‘strong and intelligent woman of color’ who has ‘dedicated almost my entire adult life to protecting the safety, security and the freedom of all Americans in this country.’”

“Over two segments, Behar and Gabbard went at it over everything from her endorsements from white nationalists to her regular appearances on Fox News. After the show replayed Clinton’s comments, Gabbard said, ‘It’s offensive to me as a soldier, as an American, as a member of Congress, as a veteran, and frankly as a woman, to be so demeaned in such a way.’”

“When Gabbard reiterated her attacks on Hillary Clinton as a ‘warmonger,’ Behar asked, ‘What’s your evidence of that?’ Gabbard shot back, ‘Are you serious?’”

atulsi 6

“Things got even more heated between the two women after a break when Behar suggested that Gabbard might be an ‘unwitting’ asset of Russia, ‘not that that means you’re stupid, but people can be used.’”

‘“That’s exactly what that means though,’ Gabbard replied. ‘Let me start with how offensive it is to say that I’m a witting or unwitting asset of a foreign country, working against the interests of my country, a country that I am willing to lay my life down for. So if you are saying it’s not deliberately, then you are implying that I am too stupid and too naive and lack the intelligence to know what I am doing. And that is extremely offensive to me and to every woman of color.’”

Let me respond by asking, WHO THE HELL DOES JOY BEHAR THINK SHE IS?!

Where does Joy Behar get off questioning Tulsi Gabbard’s patriotism?

Where does Joy Behar get off questioning Tulsi Gabbard’s integrity?

Where does Joy Behar get off questioning Tulsi Gabbard’s intelligence?

How Joy Behar is allowed to sit there and accuse an American hero, like Tulsi Gabbard, of treason, is way, way, way beyond me.

Joy Behar should be ashamed of herself.

ABC should be ashamed of itself.

And Joy Behar should be out of a job and pursuing a different line of work.

Like I said, Behar may regret parroting Hillary in the end, and if Tulsi is successful in her suit against Clinton, The View and Behar may be next!

Let the games, and the lawsuits, begin!

atulsi 5

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

My reaction to some recent headlines:  (1) Lock up Attorney General William Barr?  (2) Another date that will “go down in infamy?” (3) Why are the House Democrats out to get Attorney General Barr?  (4) Democrat lawmaker records himself harassing a pro-life woman.  And (5) Joy “less” Behar of “The View” is at it again. 

There are so many topics I’d like to offer my insight on, but so little time!  So every once in a while I like to respond to a number of articles that I couldn’t necessarily devote an entire daily blog to on an article by article basis.

Welcome to my second edition of “MrEricksonRules’ headline buffet line!”

100 chance of winning

Pick your favorite(s) or have some of each.  It’s totally up to you!

<<<<<<<1>>>>>>>

“Imprisoning Bill Barr is [the] left’s new rallying cry: ‘Have him locked up!’”

By Brooke Singman of Fox News.

“The battle between congressional Democrats and the Justice Department over Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report has reached new levels of vitriol, as some on the left call for Attorney General Bill Barr to be physically dragged in to testify or even locked up for defying congressional subpoenas.”

“The demands have escalated after the attorney general refused to appear before the House Judiciary Committee last week amid disagreements over the format of the hearing.”

“Though he testified a day earlier on the Senate side, Democrats on the committee still want to bring in the DOJ leader to answer questions on the conclusion of Mueller’s investigation. Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., also imposed a Monday morning deadline for Barr to turn over the full, unredacted Mueller report and additional files — a deadline the DOJ apparently missed, prompting Nadler to schedule a Wednesday vote on contempt proceedings against Barr.”

Everything that William Barr has done up this point is completely within in rights and responsibilities as Attorney General.

What we have on the democrats’ side is a bunch of grandstanding, and now desperation, as they learned that Mr. Barr was looking into what really happened regarding Russian collusion, and what really happened regarding spying on Americans, and what really happened that caused this fraudulent investigation to be launched in the first place.

headlines 3

Their main goal now is to discredit him, silence him, and preferably have him resign or be removed from office.  Anything but allow him to drag their “swampy” friends out into the sunlight.

headlines 15

‘“He [Attorney General Barr] lied to Congress.  And if anybody else did that, it would be considered a crime,’ Pelosi told reporters. ‘Nobody is above the law. Not the president of the United States.  Not the attorney general.’”

Apparently Mrs. Pelosi is an exception to that rule…, as she lies ALL of the time to Congress, to us, to basically anyone within earshot of her.

“Pelosi’s public comments came after she, according to Politico, told Rep. Charlie Crist, D-Fla., during a private caucus meeting Thursday: ‘We saw [Barr] commit a crime when he answered your question.’”

“However, according to both the Post and the Justice Department, Mueller made clear that he did not feel that Barr’s summary was inaccurate.  Instead, Mueller told Barr that media coverage of the letter had “misinterpreted” the results of the probe concerning obstruction of justice.”

We all know it doesn’t matter to the democrats what anyone actually says…, the only thing that matters is what they want us to hear.

<<<<<<<2>>>>>>>

“NPR reporter refers to Barr summary in same terms as FDR describing attack on Pearl Harbor.”

By Anna Hopkins of Fox News

“The Department of Justice reporter for NPR [National Public Radio] referred to the date of Attorney General Barr’s summary of the Mueller report as ‘a date that will live … in infamy,’ a phrase many associate with President Franklin Roosevelt’s 1941 speech following the Pearl Harbor attack.”

headlines 10

“NPR’s Carrie Johnson made the comment during the NPR Politics podcast last Wednesday while discussing Barr’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, during which he answered questions about the summary he gave of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.”

NPR…, another arm of the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media.”

Aren’t you be a tad dramatic there Ms. Johnson?

“A day that will live in infamy?”

Really?

How about the day that people in our government were contemplating a coup against President Trump?  How about that day?

How about the day the DOJ and the FBI decided they were going to falsify testimony to the FISA court and spy on the Trump campaign?  How about that day?

How about the day that the FBI overstepped its bounds and declared Hillary did not break any laws, regarding obstructing justice by destroying her server and then deleting over 33,00 emails, because that was not her “intent.”  How about that day?

You’re pathetic, Carrie Johnson.  You’re just a tool to be used by the liberal propaganda machine. You’re no journalist, and you’re no reporter.

You’re a fool.

<<<<<<<3>>>>>>>

“Why are the House Democrats out to get Attorney General Barr?”

By Representative Andy Biggs for Fox News

“Democrats in Congress are so worried that the American people will find out what is NOT in the Mueller report that they will say and do almost anything. The report exposes their false assertions that President Trump cooperated with the Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election. They will resort to embarrassing stunts like bringing fast food chicken buckets into congressional hearings. And, they will attempt to destroy the reputation of Attorney General William Barr simply because he is the messenger who released the Mueller report to the public.”

headlines 13

“Consider that House Democrat leaders are claiming Barr lied about … what? They are upset because he wrote a memo iterating the major findings in the Mueller report. They castigated Barr for the few weeks it took for him to make legally required redactions in the Mueller report before he could publicly release the report. Turns out Barr’s initial summary was accurate. And, we have a special counsel report that is available for public viewing with very few redactions, proving that Democrats weren’t telling the truth for over two years.”

“The Democrats must also be troubled that the inspector general will soon be releasing his report regarding the findings of his investigation into the abuse of power, which includes obtaining secret warrants to spy on the Trump campaign under the Obama administration. They dare not let go of their attack on the president and anyone who works with him, knowing that the IG report will likely contain damaging revelations of the Democrat National Committee and the Clinton presidential campaign working with Russians to unleash the police apparatus under President Obama to spy on the Trump campaign for political purposes.”

headlines 5

The democrats are counting on the complicit “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” to do their part and downplay or ignore any potentially damaging evidence that turns up.

They, in turn, will just continue to deny, deny, deny, and attempt to discredit William Barr, and anyone else that may need to be silenced.

Republican Representative Andy Biggs represents the 5th Congressional District of Arizona.

<<<<<<<4>>>>>>>

“Dem state lawmaker records himself harassing pro-life woman outside Planned Parenthood”

By Caleb Parke of Fox News

“PA [Pennsylvania] State Representative Brian Sims recorded himself harassing a pro-life woman peacefully protesting outside a Planned Parenthood abortion clinic in Sims’ Philadelphia district.”

headlines 12

“A Pennsylvania Democratic state representative went on an eight-minute rant, verbally harassing an elderly woman protesting outside a Planned Parenthood abortion clinic.”

“Brian Sims recorded a woman outside Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, which is in his district, telling her to pray at home, calling her an ‘old white lady’ and lecturing her about her Christian beliefs on the Periscope app.”

‘“Push back against Planned Parenthood protestors, PLEASE!’ Sims wrote on Twitter Thursday. ‘They prey on young women, they use white privilege, & shame. They’re racist, classist, bigots who NEED & DESERVE our righteous opposition. Push back, please!’”

So here we have another obvious example of double standards exhibited by the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake new media.”

Here we have a politician no less, harassing an elderly citizen, who is doing everything within her rights as a citizen to do.

He brings her race into play, and then has the nerve to later call her a racist!

He also attacks her religion, which is okay to do, as long as it’s Christianity.  God forbid he would attack a Muslim!!!  Then we would really have a problem here!

The level of confusion exhibited by these clowns is just so impressive.

<<<<<<<5>>>>>>>

“Joy Behar slams ‘unpatriotic’ Trump, says GOP supporters should remove ‘those flag pins.’”

By Brian Flood for Fox News

‘“The View’ co-host Joy [less] Behar said on Monday that Republicans who support President Trump should take off ‘those flag pins’ because the president’s behavior regarding Russian meddling is ‘unpatriotic.’”

headlines 2

‘“It isn’t just that. Let’s talk about, you know, the fact that he met with Putin for 90 minutes… and never once brought up the fact that Russia, Russia interfered in our election,’ Behar said.

These libs just throw this stuff around like they know what they’re talking about.

How exactly did the Russians “interfere” with our elections?  They sure interfered far less than our own FBI and DOJ!  And I don’t hear her crying about James Comey or Loretta Lynch though!

That’s because Joy “less” Behar has no idea what she is talking about.  She is just a part of the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media.”

headlines 3

“Behar continued: ‘I said last week I don’t want to see any of those flag pins anymore on Republicans who don’t stand up against this guy for Russian meddling, and other things that he’s done. It seems as though he’s unpatriotic.’”

headlines 4

Joy “less” Behar is so far off base here, it’s hard to know how to respond.  So I guess I won’t.

“You can’t argue with crazy” is something my wife says all of the time.

And she’s right.

So I won’t.

“Behar has attacked Trump and his supporters on a regular basis, mocking everything from Mike Pence’s Christian faith to women who support Trump.  She immediately backtracked last September after saying ‘God forbid President Trump lives another 20 years.’”

What a peach.

headlines 1

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

“Waaaah…, the election was stolen from me…, waaah!” – Hillary Clinton

According to Liam Quinn, a senior editor at Fox News, “Hillary Clinton suggests the election was ‘stolen’ from her, and other Dems could ‘suffer the same fate.’”

“Hillary Clinton suggested she had the 2016 election ‘stolen’ from her during the latest stop of her slumping speaking tour.”

hillary stolen 9

“Taking the stage with her husband Bill in Los Angeles Saturday night as part of the couple’s ‘Evening with the Clintons’ tour, the former Democrat presidential nominee told the crowd she has been warning potential candidates they could suffer the same fate.”

Ha!  An evening with the Clintons!?

More like an evening with a serial sex offender and his scheming, apologist, power hungry, wanna be president, partner in crime.

hillary stoen 10

‘“I think it’s also critical to understand that, as I’ve been telling candidates who have come to see me, you can run the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you,’ the former secretary of state said.”

Oh really?  Which candidates exactly have been coming to see you, Hillary?  I’m calling bull caca on that claim.

hillary stolen 2

“She’s hardly the only prominent Democrat claiming to have been wrongly kept out of office. On Friday, Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams again claimed she won the state’s 2018 gubernatorial race, despite losing to now-Gov. Brian Kemp.”

‘“I’m here to tell you a secret that makes Breitbart and [Fox News host] Tucker Carlson go crazy: We won,’ Abrams said, according to The Houston Chronicle. ‘I am not delusional. I know I am not the governor of Georgia — possibly yet.’”

No, Stacey, you’re not “delusional,” you’re just a bad loser, and a typical racist, liberal, socialist…, and you don’t know how to talk.

Bam!  Ya, I just said that!

“Abrams justified her refusal to accept the result of the election by calling Kemp ‘an architect of voter suppression that spent the last eight years knitting together a system of voter suppression that is unparalleled in America.’”

Ya…, how dare Governor Kemp attempt to suppress the votes of dead people, non-citizens, and fraudulent mail-in ballots!

The nerve of that guy!

“At the Clinton event, the crowd broke out in applause after Hillary Clinton delivered the ‘stolen’ election line, before she continued with a jab at President Trump.”

‘“And that, my friends, has nothing to do with the economy,’ she said.”

No it doesn’t, Hillary…, but “It’s the economy, stupid” was coined by your hubby’s own campaign strategist, James Carville, during his successful 1992 presidential campaign…, stupid!

“So part of our challenge is to understand what it will take to put together not only the popular vote but the Electoral College.”

Wow…, that’s a good idea Hillary!  Maybe you should have thought about that before the last election…, since, you know…, the winner is decided by which candidate gets the most Electoral College votes.  Duh!

“Clinton won the popular vote in her 2016 campaign against Trump, but lost the Electoral College — and with it, the race.”

She not only lost the Electoral College election, but she got creamed, 304 – 227.

It’s pretty hard to “steal” something from someone who never had the thing to begin with!

Fox News contributor Dan Bongino asked, “How can the woman whose team colluded with Russia during the 2016 campaign claim the election was ‘stolen’ from her’ [by the Russians]?”

hillary stolen 1

“The former first lady also questioned how Trump could still hold conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin following the release of the information in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report.”

Uhhh, maybe because Mueller found no proof of collusion between President Trump and “the Russians,” whatever or whoever “the Russians” means…, or haven’t you heard?

hillary stolen 6hillary stolen 4

“Mueller’s report ‘not only decisively proves, but goes chapter and verse about how the Russians — in the words of the report — conducted a sweeping and systemic interference in our election,’ she said, according to the Seattle Times. ‘And then you wake up and your president is spending an hour on the phone with Vladimir Putin, who was the mastermind of the interference and attack on our election.’”

I’ve said this before…, but Hillary has not read the Mueller report.  All she does is make up whatever narrative she wants and then attributes it to the report, which she know the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” won’t question or dispute.

hillary stolen 5

According to Michael F. Haverluck, of OneNewsNow.com, “The first Clinton event that was held at a Canadian hockey area – which houses nearly 20,000 seats – saw a mere 3,300 tickets sold, and more seat backs than Clinton fans were visible when the lights dimmed and the couple started talking.”

“For their May 19 show at The Forum in Inglewood, California, – which seats more than 17,000 – tickets usually priced at $77 are now going for $35, with $120 tickets discounted to $50, and $175 seats down to $72,” the U.K. daily informed [And tickets were all the way down to $6.50 just prior to the event!]. ‘Despite the site telling customers that ‘tickets are selling fast!’ with ‘limited time remaining,’ it appears that less than 450 discounted tickets have actually been sold.’”

I guess Hillary is about as popular now as she was during the election!

Unlike during the election, however, you can’t pay people to come to your events…, because, in this case, what would be the point?

In conclusion…, let’s be clear…, nothing was “stolen” from you Hillary.

hillary stolen 8

In reality…, you just plain lost…, and conversely…, we know that YOU were the one who cheated during the debates.  You were the one who had your party rig the primary election against Bernie Sanders.  YOU and your partners in crime were the ones who colluded with the Russians in an attempt to dig up dirt on and/or frame Donald Trump.  And YOU were and are the one who has obstructed justice at every turn.

And you just continue to lie misinform the people whenever you open your mouth.

LOCK HER UP!

LOCK HER UP!

LOCK HER UP!

Fox News’ Adam Shaw and Andrew O’Reilly also contributed to Liam Quinn’s report.

hillary stolen 11

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Let’s not forget how the FBI and the DOJ participated in promoting this historic hoax against our president called “Russian collusion.”

Now that Robert Mueller’s investigation has concluded, and its determination was that there was no Trump-Russia collusion, there have been calls to examine the probe’s origins at the FBI.

President Trump has called for Congress and/or our new Attorney General to “look into” those who had created a “false narrative” sparking the fairy tale investigation.

agent-strzok-texted-well-stop-trump-from-34099662

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., has already committed to look into the FBI’s actions here.

Another Inspector General’s (IG) report about much of this is expected to come out within the next three months as well.  Perhaps this report will bring some of these actions and behaviors out into the light and into question.

We’ll see.

Let’s not forget that the FBI is an agency within the Department of Justice (DOJ), and that the FBI Director reports to the Attorney General of the United States.  So while all of this was occurring, we had James Comey reporting to Loretta Lynch, both of whom were appointed to their positions by Barack Obama.

The slogan of the FBI, which appears on its symbolic badge is “Fidelity, Bravery, Integrity.” This slogan, which originated 1935 by FBI Inspector W.H. Drane Lester, describes the high moral standards the FBI expects from its staff.

These expectations apparently do not extend to their upper management level personnel!

Let’s take a walk down memory lane and recall some of these text message gems that some of these non-political protectors of the republic felt compelled to send.

On Aug. 8, 2016, FBI lawyer Lisa Page texted her adulterous lover, Peter Strzok, who was in charge of the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton and later worked on the Russia probe: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”

Strzok responded on his FBI-issued work phone: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”

obama strzok page texts

This text was discovered by the inspector general at the U.S. Department of Justice, after the FBI amazingly failed to uncover the message on its own.  That’s odd.

We all learned they have a hard time recovering emails, but I guess that applies to certain text messages as well!

This is what a previous report by the Inspector General had to say about Strzok’s text, “It is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects.”

The inspector general’s office also asked Strzok for his response.

“When asked about this text message, Strzok stated that he did not specifically recall sending it, but that he believed that it was intended to reassure Page that Trump would not be elected, not to suggest that he would do something to impact the investigation,” the report notes.

Strzok later told the House Judiciary Committee that he meant Americans in general would stop Trump in 2016.

strzok media leak strategy

You have to ask the question, “What were these people at the FBI and the DOJ so worried about regarding Donald Trump possibly being elected?

I mean…, fine…, you want Hillary Clinton to win, but is it the end of the world if she doesn’t?

These people apparently think so, since they were willing to go as far as to undo a legitimate presidential election.

As time goes on, I think we’re beginning to see what they were all afraid of.  They were all afraid that we would get a glimpse into their “deep state” operations and that their gig would be up.  And it is.

In an Aug. 15, 2016 text message, Strzok told Page: “I want to believe … that there’s no way Trump gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk.  It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

According to Maxim Lott for Fox News, “Critics say the text implies Strzok wanted the investigation to hurt Trump in case he were to win.”

Strzok also told the IG and the House Judiciary Committee that his text meant “an investigation should happen right away.”

“My use of the phrase ‘insurance policy’ was simply to say, while the polls or people might think it is less likely that then-candidate Trump would be elected, that should not influence … us doing our job responsibly,” Strzok told the House Judiciary Committee.

Oh, okay, that makes sense to me now.

Have I told you how happy I am you got fired Mr. Strzok?

Well, I am.

“Despite having called the Russia situation an ‘insurance policy’ and having pressed for more vigorous investigation, a text from May 17, 2017 shows Strzok had doubts.”

“In texts to Page, Strzok questioned whether he should join Mueller’s team investigating Trump and Russia because: “you and I both know the odds [of us finding anything] are nothing.  If I thought it [an investigation] was likely [to turn up anything] I’d be there no question.”

“Strzok did ultimately joined the team investigating Trump, before being removed and then fired, after the IG report revealed his texts.’

strzok and page on mueller team

In February 2016, while Hillary Clinton was under investigation for improper handling of classified information, the Department of Justice wanted to send four attorneys to question Clinton.

But FBI attorney Page urged both Strzok and then FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to only allow two DOJ people to be sent.

“Our best reason to hold the line at 2 is she might be our next president,” Page explained to McCabe via text. “The last thing we need is us going in there loaded for bear, when it is not operationally necessary… This is as much about reputational protection as anything.”

Hmmm, they didn’t seem to have any of these concerns when dealing with Donald Trump.  Just sayin’.

The Inspector General report also found an exchange between FBI employees on their work phones from Nov. 9, just after the election.

“I can’t stop crying,” one unidentified FBI employee said.

“That makes me even more sad… I can’t stop stressing about what I could have done differently,” an unidentified FBI attorney replied.

The same FBI employee who discussed crying after the election also used an FBI-issued device to direct class-based disdain toward Trump supporters: “Trump’s supporters are all poor to middle class, uneducated, lazy POS that think he will magically grant them jobs for doing nothing.”

Peter Strzok used similar language, saying in one text: “Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support….”

Ha!

Well we can smell you and your partners in crime too, Strzok, and you smell rotten…, rotten to the core.

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please scroll down to the very bottom of this page and click the “Follow” button.  That’ll keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

What we had here, and still have here, is character assassination of the highest order.

For close to two years now we’ve heard and read and watched politicians, political activists, political strategists, lawyers of all kinds, entertainers, reporters and commentators accuse President Trump, his family and his support staff of Russian collusion and obstruction of justice, on a daily basis, like it was a forgone conclusion…, like it was a matter of fact.

How many times have we seen these smug commentators accuse, condemn and convict The President, all in the same breath?

russian hoax 2

Well…, what a difference a day makes!

I just can’t wait for all of the apologies to start showing up.

Could you detect the sarcasm in my words there?

I’m not going to hold my breath on that one!

Here are just a few of the thousands of well documented lies that have been perpetrated on President Trump and pushed on the American people for close to two years on a daily basis:

“There’s actually lots of evidence of Trump-Russia collusion [and the] untenability of the ‘no collusion’ talking point.” – Matthew Yglesias for Vox.com

I’m sure Robert Mueller would have appreciated it if you could have provided this evidence to him, Matthew!

Just in case you missed it Matthew, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team issued more than 2,800 subpoenas and executed nearly 500 search warrants in its probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election and any potential involvement by President Donald Trump’s campaign.  The special counsel employed 19 lawyers and was assisted by a team of 40 FBI agents, intelligence analysts, forensic accountants and other professional staff.  The team interviewed approximately 500 witnesses, and they were still unable to come up with ANYTHING…, but you insist that “there’s actually lots of evidence of Trump-Russia collusion.” Amazing!  Perhaps you should consider a career with the FBI!  It looks like they could have used you!

“I think there is direct evidence in the e-mails from the Russians through their intermediary offering dirt on Hillary Clinton as part of what is described in writing as the Russian government effort to help elect Donald Trump. They offer that dirt. There is an acceptance of that offer in writing from the president’s son Don Jr. and there is overt acts in furtherance of that.  That is the meeting at Trump Tower and all the lies to cover up that meeting at the Trump Tower and apparently lies that the president participated in. That to me is direct evidence but there’s also abundant circumstantial evidence.” – Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., made the comment to CBS’s Margaret Brennan on “Face the Nation” as he vowed to use his panel’s renewed inquiry into Trump to track down all signs of misconduct.

“There is ample evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russians.” – Adam Schiff

“There is already, in my view, ample evidence in the public domain on the issue of collusion if you’re willing to see it.” – Adam Schiff

Oh, Mr. Schiff.  You can’t possibly be that stupid, so you must be corrupt.  Intentionally misleading the American people and referring to “evidence” you obviously don’t have would seem to make its own case for obstructing justice.  And you’re the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee?  Shame on you.  God help us all.

russian hoax

“The President’s abuse of power goes far beyond collusion.” – House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y.

Jerrold Nadler.  Another fine example of democrat inbreeding.

Well, Mr. Nadler, according to you, “The President’s abuse of power goes far beyond collusion,” and it would have to far, far, far beyond collusion, since there was no collusion according to your knight in shining armor, Robert Mueller.

“Trump, from what has been revealed so far, definitely has committed obstruction of justice.” – Jerrold Nadler

From what has been revealed so far, sir, the only thing we are now painfully aware of is that you’re a liar and a disingenuous buffoon.

democrats lie

“Yes, The President knew the Russians were seeking to help him.  So he went out as a candidate, invited them to hack more, did not tell his family not to take any of these meetings, was told by Roger Stone that WikiLeaks, a Russian cut-out, was also going to be putting out materials damaging to his opponent, and he went on the stage and said, ‘I love WikiLeaks.’ This is circumstantial evidence which in a court of law can be treated as the same as direct evidence. Yes, he colluded. I don’t think that’s a hard question to answer at all.” – House Intel Committee member Eric Swalwell, D-CA.

“I have seen classified information that strongly suggests collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.” – Eric Swalwell to CNN’s John Berman and Poppy Harlow.

Adam Schiff is obviously Mr. Swalwell’s hero.  He no doubt aspires to be as contemptible, despicable, dirty, pitiful and as scurvy as Adam Schiff.  If you’re going to dream, dream big, as they say!  Right, Mr. Swalwell!?

I’m sure that all of these politicians, political activists, political strategists, lawyers of all kinds, entertainers, reporters and commentators will continue to spout their absurdities…, as if they have any credibility left.

Pathetic.

Just remember my “swampy” liberal “friends…,” your days of operating under the radar are gone.  We the people have our eyes wide open now, and we now see you for what you are and not for what you would pretend to be.

WINNING!

its-time-to-keep-winning-donald-trump

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please scroll down to the very bottom of this page and click the “Follow” button.  That’ll keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Investigations here…, investigations there…, investigations everywhere!

The now democrat controlled House Judiciary Committee opened a whole new investigation this week into President Donald Trump and his “associates.”  The committee is requesting documents from 81 “agencies, entities, and individuals” connected to the administration and President Trump’s private businesses.

As reported by William Cummings of USA TODAY, ‘“Over the last several years, President Trump has evaded accountability for his near-daily attacks on our basic legal, ethical, and constitutional rules and norms,’ House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., said in a statement announcing the investigation ‘into the alleged obstruction of justice, public corruption, and other abuses of power by President Trump, his associates, and members of his Administration.’”

“Those issued document requests included names connected to the Trump Organization, the Trump campaign and the White House.”

Wait…, what happened to the Mueller report?

What happened to the anticipation and expectation of Robert Mueller crucifying President Trump and his entire family?

What happened to the liberals’ vision of President Trump being “perp walked” into jail?

What?

Apparently these democrats know something (something we’ve known from the beginning).

Apparently they know that Mueller’s report is going to confirm the “witch hunt” that has been going on for two years.

Apparently they know that Mueller’s report is going to be a whole lot of nothing.

And now they want to try and continue to drive the false narrative of some kind of, any kind of, wrong doing by President Trump and anyone he’s ever come in contact with.

I would like to add that these democrats should be careful because they are setting a dangerous precedent regarding their version of “investigations gone wild!”

“Among the names were both of Trump’s adult sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump; Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner; the Trump trust; Allen Weisselberg, the Trump Organization’s chief financial officer; former national security adviser Michael Flynn; longtime Trump associate Roger Stone; former White House adviser Steve Bannon; WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange; former White House press secretary Sean Spicer; former White House communications director Hope Hicks; the National Rifle Association and former Attorney General Jeff Sessions.”

I didn’t notice Ivanka’s name?  Some “swamp dweller” is going to be in trouble for leaving her off of the list!

“The House Intelligence Committee has already announced a separate probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election and Trump’s foreign financial interests.”

Again…, what happened to the Mueller report?

What happened to all of that talk about Mueller “bringing the evil Donald Trump to justice?”

What happened to all of this “overwhelming evidence of Russian collusion” talk?

On Sunday, that committee’s chairman, the ever reprehensible, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., told ABC’s “This Week” that he plans to investigate “allegations that the Russians have been laundering money through the Trump Organization.”

Again…, what happened to the Mueller report?

The Special Counsel has a more wide ranging authority in these types of investigations than Congress has.  What makes Schiff think he’ll be able to uncover things that Mueller hasn’t?

The answer is Schiff doesn’t think that.

The answer is Schiff knows he is just continuing the harassment of The President and his family without any real justification.

And the “biased, liberal, fake news, propaganda media” are more than happy to cooperate with Mr. Schiff and Mr. Nadler.

Regarding all of this, President Trump tweeted, “After more than two years of Presidential Harassment, the only things that have been proven is that Democrats and others broke the law.”

“I am an innocent man being persecuted by some very bad, conflicted & corrupt people in a Witch Hunt that is illegal & should never have been allowed to start – And only because I won the Election! Despite this, great success!” The President said.

“Presidential Harassment by “crazed” Democrats at the highest level in the history of our Country. Likewise, the most vicious and corrupt Mainstream Media that any president has ever had to endure – Yet the most successful first two years for any President.”

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 4, 2019

Cummings added, “He [President Trump] also criticized ‘ridiculous partisan investigations’ during his recent State of the Union address.”

“Schiff and Nadler have both publicly expressed their belief that Trump is guilty of several crimes, but both have also said they are waiting to see the conclusions from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation before calling for the president’s impeachment.”

‘“It’s very clear that the president obstructed justice,” Nadler said Sunday on ‘This Week.’ But he cautioned that ‘impeachment is a long way down the road.’”

Ya, it’s as clear as mud.

Both Schiff and Nadler claim obstruction of justice “is clear,” that Russian collusion “is clear,” and that they even have evidence, but this evidence never materializes and their claims seem to evaporate like a puddle on the sidewalk on a warm summer day.

“We don’t have the facts yet, but we’re going to initiate proper investigations,” he said. “Before you impeach somebody, you have to persuade the American public that it ought to happen.”

Wow!  Something truthful can come out of their mouths!  They don’t have any facts yet, and the truth is they have no justification for even initiating an investigation.

“We have sent these document requests in order to begin building the public record,” Nadler said, adding that Mueller and federal prosecutors for the Southern District of New York “are aware that we are taking these steps.”

“House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said that Nadler is starting fresh investigations because he does not believe Mueller will conclude there was collusion between Russians and the Trump campaign.”

‘“Congressman Nadler decided to impeach the president the day the president won the election,’ McCarthy said on ‘This Week.’”

Maybe The President and all of his friends should respond to Congress the way Hillary and all of her friends have:  by ignoring congressional document requests and pleading “the fifth.”

According to Ben Shapiro of Breitbart News, “Hillary Clinton has a long history of hiding documents.”

“… the media have ignored Hillary Clinton’s obstructions and dissemblance for decades.  Hillary Clinton has a long and inglorious history of alleged document tampering and questionable legal maneuverings.”

Here are some of her greatest hits of “thwarted record requests,” besides her most recent escapades of deleting over 33,000 subpoenaed emails, having the hard drive on her private server bleached, and smashing all of her and her staff’s devices with hammers:

“Clinton used her private email address to avoid turning over documents to Congressional committees investigating the Benghazi, Libya terror attack of September 11, 2012. According to the Times, ‘It was one of several instances in which records requests sent to the State Department, which had no access to Mrs. Clinton’s emails, came up empty.’ The State Department did the same routine with regard to a Freedom of Information Act request asking for correspondence between Hillary and former political hit man Sidney Blumenthal; in 2010, the AP said its FOIA requests had gone unanswered by the State Department on the same grounds; the same holds true with regard to FOIA requests from conservative group Citizens United.”

“Hillary’s First ‘Emailgate.’ According to Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch, Hillary’s top woman, Cheryl Mills – you may remember her from Benghazi – “helped orchestrate the cover-up of a major scandal, often referred to as ‘Email-gate.’” Over the course of years, the Clinton Administration allegedly withheld some 1.8 million email communications from Judicial Watch’s attorneys, as well as federal investigators and Congress. Judicial Watch says that when a White House computer contractor attempted to reveal the emails, White House officials “instructed her to keep her mouth shut about the hidden e-mail or face dismissal and jail time.”

“Hillary’s Missing Whitewater Documents. In 1996, a special Senate Whitewater committee released a report from the FBI demonstrating that documents sought in the Whitewater investigation had been found in the personal Clinton quarters of the White House. The First Lady’s fingerprints were on them. The documents had gone mysteriously missing for two years. Mark Fabiani, special White House counsel, immediately stated that there was no problem, according to the Times: ‘He added that she had testified under oath that she had nothing to do with the documents during the two years they were missing and did not know how they ended up in the family quarters.’ Hillary remains the only First Lady in American history to be fingerprinted by the FBI. Those weren’t the only missing Whitewater documents later found in the Clinton White House. Rose Law billing records were found years after being sought ‘in the storage area in the third-floor private residence at the White House where unsolicited gifts to the President and First Lady are stored before being sorted and catalogued.’”

“Hillary’s Missing Travelgate Documents. In 1996, just before the Whitewater documents emerged – literally the day before – a two-year-old memo emerged, according to The New York Times, showing that Hillary ‘had played a far greater role in the dismissal of employees of the White House travel office than the Administration has acknowledged.’ Oops.”

“Hillary has a long history of this behavior. The media are less interested in governmental transparency than in picking the next president – and making sure the next president represents the hard, corrupt left.”

Just another example, in a long line of examples, of the double standards and the hypocrisy of the democrats and their partners in crime, the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media.”

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please scroll down to the very bottom of this page and click the “Follow” button.  That’ll keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

schiff-nadler

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑