Aaaaaaaand, the Dems are stuck with Angry Joe!

Ha!

abiden3 3

At this point, it looks like the democrats have painted themselves into a corner with Joe Biden.

If President Trump was verbally tripping all over himself and demonstrating the confusion Angry Joe does on a regular basis…, you can be sure the democrats would be trying to enact the 25th amendment to The Constitution, regarding declaring the president “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, thus transferring the authority of the president to the vice president.”

But, since we’re talking about “Swampy Joe” here, the democrats and their co-conspirators, the fake news media, will continue to either downplay Angry Joe’s forgetfulness and confusion, or just ignore it altogether.

abiden3 7

The democrats are “all in” with Creepy Joe, and they’re holding a pair of deuces!

Giving them the odds of winning with a pair of deuces may be a little generous…, except you know the democrats will have a card or two up their sleeve!

Anyway, soooo…, after having 3 years of being able to come up with potential candidates.

After all of the campaigning.

After all of the debates.

After all of the caucuses and primaries.

After all of this…, the democrats have decided that Joe Biden is the best they have to offer?

Old, Senile, and confused Joe Biden?

Sleepy Joe Biden?

Creepy Joe Biden?

Quid Pro Quo Joe Biden?

And now, Angry Joe Biden?

This is who the democrats have chosen to rally behind?

abiden3 1

abiden3 2

There will be a lot of pressure now for Bernie Sanders to bow out of the race, as democrats will want to try and keep Angry Joe’s actual voter interaction and his actual speaking time to a minimum, in an attempt to minimize his gaffe factor. They especially want Bernie to call it quits before the upcoming debate in Phoenix, Arizona, on March 15th.

Money is not an object for the establishment democrats…, and Bernie stands to become a very wealthy man if he chooses to play ball and become a “team player.”

The only problem with the democrats’ strategy is Quid Pro Quo Joe is eventually going to have to go toe to toe with President Trump.

And that, my friends, is not going to be a pretty sight for Angry Joe, and democrats in general.

WINNING!

FOUR MORE YEARS!

FOUR MORE YEARS!

abiden3 4

abiden3 5

abiden3 6

abiden3 8

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

WE MUST STOP BERNIE NOW! (Said the old establishment democrats.)

asuper 6

Why would Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar end their presidential campaigns ONE DAY BEFORE Super Tuesday?

Why would Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar end their presidential campaigns one day before over a third of all democrat delegates were up for grabs?

Why would Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar end their presidential campaigns after a year of campaigning…, after a year of spending millions of dollars…, after a year of giving endless speeches…, one day before over a third of all democrat primary delegates are decided?

asuper 2

And why would they suddenly endorse Sleepy Joe Biden?

Someone must have made it extremely worth their while.

The question is…, who would stand to benefit the most from them dropping out one day before the primaries on Super Tuesday?

Who needs to make a good, or better, showing on Super Tuesday…, Biden, Bernie or Bloomberg?

I believe the answer to that question would be “creepy and confused” Joe Biden.

asuper 1

Now…, who was in a position to make their drop-outs happen?

asuper 3

I don’t believe Bernie needs their help in the first place, so I’m ruling him out.

Bloomberg can afford to do anything he wants, and he probably stands to pick-up the most votes in this scenario as well.

The democrat establishment behind Biden wields a lot of money power and a lot of political positional power.

In the final analysis, it’s my belief that it was the anti-Bernie establishment democrats who were responsible for Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar bowing out the day before Super Tuesday.

“Creepy and confused” Joe Biden and Mini-Mike Bloomberg will both benefit because of this, although Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar specifically endorsed Joe Biden, which tipped the hands of the establishment democrats.

The establishment democrats, however, are in the unenviable position of trying to rally behind “gaffemaster” Joe.

No sooner had Sleepy Joe received the hurried endorsements of Mayor Pete, Amy Klobuchar and Beto O’Rourke, during his campaign rally speech in Houston, TX Monday, Creepy Joe ended up declaring his stupidity rather recalling the Declaration of Independence.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident…, all men and women created by the, you know…, you know, the thing,” he said.

Then, in the same speech, Creepy Joe referred to Super Tuesday as Super Thursday!

“Look, tomorrow’s Super Thurs…, Tuesday,” he said, as members of the audience laughed and shook their heads. “I’ll tell you what, I’m rushing ahead, aren’t I?” he then said.

No, Creepy and confused” Joe…, you’re just a hot mess, and all of those people can’t believe who they’re left to vote for!

Of course, the liberal propaganda, fake news media co-conspirators, has chosen to spin Biden’s gaffes into something less concerning.

Dana Milbank of The Washington Post says, “Joe Biden isn’t just a gaffe machine.  He’s the Lamborghini of gaffes.”

asuper 4

He continues by saying, “Some say it’s unfair to draw attention to Biden when President Trump is the most mendacious [that’s “lying” to all of us uneducated deplorables] politician ever.  I disagree: Biden’s gaffes are to be celebrated, for they make him exciting. When he opens his mouth, nobody knows what is going to come out — least of all Biden.”

Did you get that?

“Biden’s gaffes are to be celebrated.”

And “President Trump is the most [lying] politician ever.”

It’s funny how that works, isn’t it?

Mr. Milbank was also very sure Donald Trump would not become President back in 2016.

asuper 8

How did eating that article taste, anyway?

Ha!

I’m sure he never ate it, just like the other windbags never left the country.

The democrats can spin it any way they want, but the bottom line remains…, their choices come down to a commie, a confused creeper and a pompous pretender.

asuper 7

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

 

Russian interference?!  Did you say “Russian interference” again?!  You did, you did say “Russian interference” again?! 

Is the fake news, liberal propaganda, really serious about this…, again?!

Really?!

It’s only February!

aelect 2

Please don’t tell me we are going to have to listen to this fairy tale garbage again for the next 9 months, leading up to the November election.

Please!

aelect 3

And then after President Trump wins it’ll be déjà vu all over again as well with this Russian crap…, again.

I guess our only hope is that CNN and MSNBC will have been completely discredited by that time and shut down.

According to Jim Acosta, Zachary Cohen, Dana Bash, Jeremy Herb, Jake Tapper, Alex Marquardt, Paul LeBlanc, Vivian Salama and Kaitlan Collins of CNN, “Russia is looking to help Trump win in 2020, election security official told lawmakers.”

aelect 4

Is there anyone at CNN who didn’t contribute to this piece of liberal propaganda?

Just sayin’!

“Washington (CNN) – The intelligence community’s top election security official delivered a briefing to lawmakers last week warning them that the intelligence community believes Russia is already taking steps to interfere in the 2020 election with the goal of helping President Donald Trump win, three sources familiar with the matter tell CNN.”

Okay, people…, time out.

Let’s stop for a minute and think about this.

Let’s stop for a minute and use our brains.

aelect 18

First, the fact that Russia wants to mess with our election is a given.  No news there at all.

But second…, you’re telling me that Russia wants to help President Trump get re-elected?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has the U.S.’s economy roaring?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has rebuilt America’s military to the strongest it’s been in our history and the strongest currently in the world?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has overseen the U.S. become oil independent from the Middle East?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has established a new branch of our military, The Space Force, which has been created to guarantee the U.S. has dominance in space over countries like Russia and China?

The Russians want to help the same President Trump who has placed embargos and other economic restrictions on them and many of their “friends” around the world?

That President Trump?

That’s the President Trump “The intelligence community’s top election security official” is talking about?

aelect 17

Excuse me Ms. “The intelligence community’s top election security official” if I call you out for what you obviously are…, just another liar and “deep state” tool who is being used to spread anti-Trump propaganda.

“Last week’s briefing, led by election security official Shelby Pierson and first reported by The New York Times, addressed the overall picture of Russia’s efforts, including hacking, weaponizing social media and attacks on election infrastructure, one of the sources said.”

aelect 1

“The briefers said Russia does favor Trump, but that helping Trump wasn’t the only thing they were trying to do as it was also designed to raise questions about the integrity of the elections process, the source added.”

And of course the democrats want to lay the groundwork about the “integrity of the election process” in order cover their butts and fit their narrative after the democrats get annihilated in the 2020 presidential and congressional elections.

Please refer to my section above again as to why the Russians would, of course, favor President Trump.

Acosta, Cohen, Bash and Herb of CNN continue, “Russia’s interference in the 2016 election — which the US intelligence community believes was aimed at boosting Trump’s candidacy and hurting his opponent, Hillary Clinton — led to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. The prospect of interference in 2020 will further test US defenses against foreign meddling, which Trump has repeatedly downplayed as he has dismissed any suggestion that Kremlin influence played a role in his election.”

aelect 14

Okay…, please, let’s take another time out here.

I’m sorry, but wasn’t the “Russian collusion hoax” been put to bed?

aelect 11

Wasn’t the fraudulently initiated Mueller investigation completed, after wasting two years of our time and coming up with NOTHING regarding President Trump and “Russian collusion?”

aelect 7

aelect 9

aelect 8

And again…, I’m sorry but wasn’t it President Obama who was aware of this “Russian election interference” in 2015 and 2016 but did nothing about it?

Wasn’t it President Obama and his deep state minions who were aware of this “Russian election interference” in 2015 and 2016 and failed to inform candidate Trump about it, but rather used it as an excuse to spy on his campaign and then frame him with the “Russian collusion hoax?”

Obama

Ha!  It’s funny how I never hear that mentioned by any of our “friends” in the fake news, liberal propaganda media.

Again…, let’s take a moment and use our brains here.

Wouldn’t it make more sense to believe that the Russians would be more inclined to “help” the democrats’ front runner, Bernie Sanders?

According to Joseph Simonson of The Washington Examiner, Bernie Sanders has been quoted as saying, ‘“I don’t mind people calling me a communist.’”

Hmmm…, well, that’s interesting.

“Although Sanders has refrained from self-identifying as a communist, his ties with far-left Marxist groups go back decades.”

Hmmm…, well, that’s interesting as well.

aelect 5

“The Washington Examiner reported last May on his ties with far-left political parties such as the Socialist Workers Party [SWP]. During his time as mayor of Burlington, Vermont, he littered his office with newspapers and pamphlets from revolutionary organizations.”

The Socialist Workers Party (SWP) is known as the communist party in the United States.

“In 1980 and 1984, Sanders endorsed SWP presidential candidates Andrew Pulley and Mel Mason. Their presidential platforms included promises to dismantle the entire U.S. military and nationalize most industries.”

Hmmm…, wouldn’t these be things Russia would be excited about getting behind as opposed to President Trump’s accomplishments and policies?

“Sanders was later investigated by the FBI concerning his ties to the SWP, although charges were never brought.”

aelect 20

As we know, charges are never brought against liberals, democrats, socialists and communists…, only conservatives.

And on a final note, according to Michael Kranish of The Washington Post, “The just-married socialist mayor from Vermont was on what he called “a very strange honeymoon,” an official 10-day [in 1988] visit to the communist country [Russia], and he was enthralled with the hospitality and the lessons that could be brought home.”

Just “enthralled!”

“The trip garnered brief mention in the 2016 presidential campaign, but earlier this year, a video from a Vermont community television station was posted online that showed a few minutes of Sanders’s unlikely celebration with the Soviets.”

“As he stood on Soviet soil, Sanders, then 46 years old, criticized the cost of housing and health care in the United States, while lauding the lower prices — but not the quality — of that available in the Soviet Union. Then, at a banquet attended by about 100 people, Sanders blasted the way the United States had intervened in other countries.”

“Sanders declined to be interviewed for this report.”

You don’t say?

I’m sure the fake news media will eventually make a Russia-Bernie connection in an effort to railroad Bernie out of their nomination process as well.

The liberal establishment is so predictably pathetic it’s laughable.

So, they’re going to be telling us the Russians are supporting both Bernie AND President Trump?

Like I said…, laughable and unbelievably shameless.

WINNING!

aelect 13

aelect 15

aelect 16

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Well, well, well…, look at what liberal “pot” is calling a liberal “kettle” black!  

Joseph A. Wulfsohn of Fox News says, “MSNBC anchor Chuck Todd is facing backlash on Monday night for suggesting that supporters for Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., are part of a ‘digital brown shirt brigade.’”

amsnbc 1

According to urbandictionay .com, “brown shirts” are, “Soldiers in Hitler’s storm trooper army during the Nazi regime. They were called this because of the colored shirts they wore.  To call someone a ‘brown shirt’ is to call them a Nazi soldier, usually hinting that they oppose human rights or freedom.”

amsnbc 2

“During a panel discussion on Sanders’ surge ahead of the New Hampshire primary, Todd cited a column critical of Sanders’ online support,” Wulfsohn added.

‘“I want to bring up something that Jonathan Last put in The Bulwark today,’ Todd began. ‘Here’s what he says, “No other candidate has anything like this digital brown shirt brigade. I mean, except for Donald Trump. The question that no one is asking is this; what if you can’t win the presidency without an online mob? What if we now live in a world having a bullying, agro-social media running around, hobbling everyone who sticks their head up is either an important ingredient for or a critical marker of success?”’”

Ya.., the other democrats only wish they had “on-line mobs” like Bernie does, or even more so, like President Trump has!

“He continued, ‘I know that everybody’s freaking out about this, but you saw the MAGA rally that’s preparing around here. There are people coming from three or four states on that. That’s real — and this is like Bernie.’”

Uh…, not quite.  You would be more correct that Bernie is like President Trump…, only on a much smaller scale.

amsnbc 5

“That sparked major backlash on social media, with the hashtag #firechucktodd trending on Twitter.”

Fire Chuck Todd?!

Why, they’re not claiming he’s “fake news” are they?!

amsnbc 7

In Chuck Todd’s defense, I’m sure he was just following marching orders…, sticking with the “brown shirts,” military type theme.

What we have here is a case of the democrat establishment “throwing some shade” Bernie’s way.

They have to incrementally attack Bernie, because Bernie will not be allowed to win…, let’s make that clear.

I mean Bernie isn’t even a democrat after all…, he’s an “independent.”

He’s allowed to get into the mix, and to bring voters to the table…, but he’s not allowed to actually win.

“Sanders’ national press secretary, Briahna Gray, blasted the Nazi-inspired comparison.”

‘“Digital brown shirt brigade.’ That’s how our Jewish candidate’s supporters are being described on the MSM [Main Stream Media]. The contempt shown for ordinary people is really something,’ Gray tweeted.”

Unless, of course, that “contempt” is directed at Trump supporters! Then it’s acceptable.

amsnbc 11

I’m sure “The Squad” members, led by AOC, would not have any problem with the anti-Semitic and idiotic Nazi undertones here.

“Todd faced similar blowback in December insulting Trump voters by suggesting they ‘want to be lied to since they believe in fairy tales — like Noah’s Ark.’”

Excuse me…, but what in the hell are you talking about, Chuck?!

You’re insulting every Christian out here by calling The Bible a “fairy tale,” and then questioning their intelligence.

amsnbc 3

“On a special installment of ‘Meet the Press,’ Todd spent much of the show focused on the spread of ‘misinformation’ in the media landscape.”

Oh really?  Conveniently leaving MSNBC, CNN, and all the rest of the liberal media out of that “landscape,” no doubt.

“But, during a panel discussion, he pointed to a letter to the editor of the Lexington Herald Leader from January 2019, something Todd thought was a ‘fascinating attempt’ to explain why so many Americans support President Trump.”

Oh, please…, enlighten us all with your “fascinating” explanation!

“The letter read, ‘[W]hy do people support Trump? It’s because people have been trained from childhood to believe in fairy tales. … This set their minds up to accept things that make them feel good. … The more fairy tales and lies he tells the better they feel. … Show me a person who believes in Noah’s ark and I will show you a Trump voter.’”

amsnbc 9

amsnbc 10

Aha.

Ok…, show me someone who believes money grows on trees…, that Socialism will solve all of our problems…, and that the earth is going to end in 10 years…, and I’ll show you a liberal democrat.

‘“This gets at something, Dean, that my executive producer likes to say, “Hey, voters want to be lied to sometimes.” They don’t always love being told hard truths,’ Todd told New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet.”

Yes, we know Chuck.  Democrat voters are especially represented here!

amsnbc 4

‘“I’m not quite sure I buy that,’ Baquet immediately responded. ‘I’m not convinced that people want to be lied to. I think people want to be comforted, and I think bad politicians sometimes say comforting things to them.’”

Ya don’t say, Mr. Baquet…, ya don’t say.

amsnbc 12

amsnbc 8

amsnbc 6

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

“Crazy” Bernie still wants to be president!

Bernie Sanders (I), Independent Senator from the state of Vermont is running for president, again.

abernie 1

Independent?

Independent exactly how?

How crazy is “Crazy” Bernie?

Well, it is actually seems to be more of a confusion…, but “crazy” will work.

abernie 2

Let’s begin with Bernie’s confusion about what he is to start things off.

I mean…, if you’re confused about who or what you are, where do you go from there?

Bernie self-identifies as an “independent,” even though he votes along with the democrats nearly 100% of the time.

If he’s an “independent,” on what issues has he sided with the Republicans?

Can anyone even name one issue where he bucked the democrats in favor of the Republicans?

And…, if Bernie truly is an “independent,” why is he participating in the Democrat presidential primaries…, again?

He refers to himself as a democratic socialist.

Isn’t that being a bit redundant these days?

Just sayin’.

abernie 6

Then there’s Bernie’s rantings about income inequality and how millionaires need to be made to pay more than their fair share.

That was until someone pointed out to Bernie that he was a millionaire.

Now Bernie rants about billionaires instead.

abernie 8

Here’s an example of how bright Bernie is.

In 2016, it is common knowledge now that Bernie was railroaded by the DNC so the establishment democrats’ darling, Hillary, could win the democrat party nomination.

So what does Bernie decide to do?

He decides to run with the democrats…, again…, so he can get screwed all over…, again!

Can anyone say, “Thank you sir, may I have another?!

I know Bernie can!

The cards are stacked against you…, again, Bernie.

Only this time the establishment’s favorite is Sleepy, Creepy, Joe Biden.

At least for now.

Then we have Bernie’s proposals for “Medicare for all” and the paying-off of student loans which would quadruple our national debt, which is already at $23 trillion!

Spoken like a true socialist/communist!

abernie 12

Bernie has also routinely accused President Trump of being sexist.

But who was the one getting called out, on national TV during the democrat presidential debate, by Senator Elizabeth Warren, of stating to her that “a woman could not win the presidency?”

It was you, Bernie!!!

Just more typical hypocrisy from our liberal friends.

In addition, I believe Bernie should just call it a day and put himself out to pasture.  I mean, he’s 78 years old!  I’m not an ageist, I’m over 60 myself, but Bernie…, dude…, why don’t you just retire, relax, kick back, dream about living in Russia and leave The United States alone?

You are aware that Bernie is a fan of Russia and communism in general, aren’t you?

It’s true.  Like they say…, you could look it up.

He’s even got Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez out there stumping for him.

Birds of a feather flock together, you know.  That includes cuckoo birds!

abernie 4

Getting back to Bernie’s millionaire status, Peter Schweizer, for Fox News, reports that, “Bernie Sanders rails about [the] common good but public service has made him (and his family) rich!”

“Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., has been a loud and constant voice for socialist policies throughout his 30 years in Washington, D.C., a self-proclaimed champion of the collective good. But in researching my new book, ‘Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Political Elite,’ I discovered that while Sanders may talk about the common good, his public service has made him and his family quite wealthy.”

abernie 10

Don’t you know, Mr. Schweizer, that this is the typical M.O. (modus operandi) for socialists and communists everywhere?

Let’s not kid ourselves that this doesn’t go on in our form of government as well, however, as Bernie so aptly demonstrates.

“Perhaps no one has benefited more from Sanders’s career in politics than his wife Jane,” Schweizer continues.

abernie 3

Is she one of these people who identifies as a female?

I’m just asking…, seriously.

“When Bernie was first elected mayor of Burlington, Vermont, he appointed his then-girlfriend, Jane Driscoll, to head his administration’s Youth Office. Though the position was originally unpaid, Bernie eventually put Jane on the payroll over objections of the city council. The job was never advertised so that others could apply. A local paper noted that Sanders never bothered to provide evidence as to Jane’s ‘qualifications’ for the position.”

Did I hear someone say Hunter?  Hunter Biden?

“The appointment would remain a source of controversy for Sanders. After Bernie and Jane got married in 1988, his new wife received a big pay increase. As one local newspaper reported, ‘Political sparks flew at Burlington’s annual city meeting Monday night as Democratic aldermen raised a series of questions concerning a hefty pay raise for Mayor Bernie Sanders’ new wife and whether she should continue to hold her job as director of the Mayor’s Youth Office.’”

“After Bernie won election to Congress in 1990, Jane’s business ties to her husband rose to a new level.”

You go girl!  What good is it being married to a congressman if you can’t take advantage of his position?

“In Washington, Jane became one of her husband’s top aides, serving at various times as his chief of staff, press secretary and political analyst. After a decade in Congress, Jane and family went about setting up a company that operated under three different names to provide income tied to Bernie’s political career.”

“On Sept. 27, 2000, the family formed Sanders & Driscoll LLC, a for-profit consulting company run by Jane, her daughter Carina, and son David. The business also operated under two trade names: Leadership Strategies and Progressive Media Strategies.”

Did I hear someone say Joe Biden?  The Bidens?  The Biden family?

“The fact that this entity and its aliases were formed just weeks before the 2000 election is significant. The Sanderses ran these out of their home on Killarney Drive in Burlington. These entities served as financial conduits to run cash to the Sanders family.”

“Bernie Sanders’s insurgent 2016 presidential campaign brought in a huge sum of money. A large chunk of it — nearly $83 million — flowed to a mysterious limited liability company with no website, no phone number, and no office space. Indeed, the LLC was registered to a private home on a cul-de-sac in suburban Virginia.”

“The mysterious company is called Old Towne Media LLC. Two names connected to the company are Barbara Abar Bougie and Shelli Hutton-Hartig, Jane’s associates from the 2006 campaign.”

You don’t say?

“The Sanders campaign purchased a whopping $82.77 million in political ads through Old Towne Media, which could have earned the company a media fee of more than $12 million, based on the industry standard for ad-buy commissions. Was Jane Sanders somehow involved in this financial arrangement? FEC disclosures make it easy to hide where media buying fees actually go. Jane listed her income from her professional work at the time as simply ‘more than $1,000.’”

“When a highly respected Vermont reporter named Jasper Craven, working for the nonprofit VTDigger.com, asked Jane about Old Towne Media during a phone interview, she replied, ‘I have no idea what Old Towne Media is.’ Then she hung up the phone.”

Please note…, only liberals are permitted to employ this course of action without any repercussions.

“Even when Jane got a job not working for Bernie, it still seemed to be connected to his political position.”

“In 2004, Jane was appointed head of Burlington College, a private school with fewer than two hundred students. One of the board members of the college admitted that Jane’s marriage to Bernie played a big role in her hiring.”

No kidding?

“Attending Burlington College was not cheap; tuition was over $23,000 a year in 2014-15. In addition, the college received millions in federal money over the years and students could apply for federal government–supported student loans. That flow of money provided funds that could be directed into family enterprises. And Jane steered Burlington College resources in the same direction as Bernie did his campaign money: it went to the family.”

“Beginning in 2009, the nonprofit Burlington College agreed to a deal with the for-profit Vermont Woodworking School to set up a carpentry program. The school, launched two years earlier, was not accredited and happened to be owned by Jane’s daughter, Carina.”

What a coincidence!

“Burlington College had never had a woodworking program before, and as when Bernie hired Jane to a city job while he was mayor, those outside the family were never invited to apply.”

Remember the motto of the socialists/communists…, “Do as I say, not as I do!”

“That first year of the alliance, the college gave Carina’s school $56,474 for ‘materials charges and lease of bench space.’ By 2010, the cash flowing from the college to the family business was more than $133,000. Payments ballooned to $182,741 in rental costs alone by 2012. In total, Burlington College would funnel more than $500,000 to Carina’s woodworking school.”

“The transactions are notable because Burlington College at the time was struggling to pay its own faculty and bills.”

“Carina’s school also received at least one federal grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to install biomass heating. At the time, Sen. Bernie Sanders sat on the powerful Senate Budget Committee, with financial oversight of the USDA budget.”

I’m sure that played no role in the school receiving any federal grant money. In fact, how dare I even mention the possibility!

“Despite the academic failings of the college, its continuing financial difficulties, and the growing river of funds that were flowing to her daughter’s business, Jane’s salary as president continued to rise. By 2009, she was making $160,000, including benefits.”

“It soon became apparent that the college did not have enough money coming in to pay its debts, and it started falling behind in its loan payments. The board of directors asked Jane to leave in 2011. She received a $200,000 severance on the way out.”

“Five years later, the college collapsed.”

Hey Bernie?  Didn’t I hear you berating President Trump because of the failure of his university?

Again…, liberal hypocrisy!

Liberal hypocrisy everywhere.

WINNING!

abernie 9

abernie 11

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Can these democrat presidential candidates, who are Senators, really be impartial jurors in the impeachment trial of President Trump?

At the start of the impeachment proceeding in The Senate, Chief Justice John Roberts administered an oath to all 100 senators as they swore to “do impartial justice” during President Donald Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

Every senator solemnly swore “that in all things pertaining to the trial of the impeachment of Donald John Trump, President of the United States, now pending, I will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws, so help me God.”

I’m sorry…, but what a bunch of liars!

And they swore to GOD to top it off!

ajurors 6

Be that as it may…, I’m specifically referring to the democrat senators who are currently presidential candidates…, Amy Klobuchar, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.

ajurors 2

By definition they are all opponents of President Trump, and they all have taken President Trump’s name in vain on a daily basis.

These three really expect us to believe they are able to “do impartial justice” where President Trump is concerned?

If these three had any honor or decency, they would recuse themselves from the impeachment trial and any Senate impeachment vote.

Wouldn’t that seem proper and reasonable?

The only problem being, we shouldn’t expect any of these three to behave properly or reasonably.

Not to mention the rest of the impeachment crazed democrats.

ajurors 3

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

What a motley crew (or “Libs Gone Wild!”): The 2020 Democrat presidential candidates!

Seriously?

This is the best group of candidates the democrats could come up with?

demcans 13

None of the current candidates conjure up any vision of them being “presidential,” with possible exception of Joe Biden.

I Predicted Hillary would run again in my blog, “I’m letting everyone know, again, that Hillary is going to run for President, again, in 2020.” from March 15, 2018, and that prediction is looking good, at least as a vice presidential candidate.

Anyway…, let’s take a look at the current crop of esteemed democrat presidential candidates, along with my official candidate classifications!

“On Life Support:” Kamala Harris and Corey Booker.  They seem to get quite a bit of media coverage, although they have been polling at 5% or less.  I believe the fact that they’re Black keeps them from falling into the next category.

“The Walking Dead:” Andrew Yang, Amy Klobuchar, Tulsi Gabbard, Julian Castro and Beto O’Rourke.  This group consistently polls less than 5%.  Beto and Julian are typically at 1% or less, yet I feel like Beto gets quite a bit of airtime.  Why would anyone care about what he says one way of the other?  Just sayin’.

Then we come to “The Cream of the Crappy Crop:” Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg.  These four typically poll with at least 13%, with Biden and Warren usually over 20%.

If Hillary doesn’t jump back into the race, or somebody else doesn’t jump into the race, one of these four will be the democrat presidential candidate for the 2020 presidential election.

Bwahahahahahahaha!

I’m sorry…, let’s get back to looking at the top 4 democrat presidential candidates.

Drumroll please…:

Number four…, Mayor Pete Buttigieg.  Of the top four, Mayor Pete is probably the most reasonable, policy-wise.  But is a small town mayor really ready to run our country?  Are we really ready for our “first lady” to be a man?  I don’t think so.

demcans 12

demcans 9

demcans 10

demcans 11

Number three…, Senator Bernie Sanders.  “Crazy” Bernie identifies as an “Independent” in The Senate, but he’s running for president as a democrat.  We knew he was a democrat all along.  Why was he misrepresenting himself the whole time?  He was obviously being disingenuous.  He seems like he’s a thousand years old, and he is not afraid to admit he’s a socialist at heart.  Your time has passed Bern.

demcans 2

Number two (or 1B)…, Senator Elizabeth Warren. When I see her, she reminds me of a “bag lady” who is wearing her best clothes and left her cart(s) outside. Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren is carrying around a lot of racial baggage, along with a lot of cultural hijacking for reasons of personal gain.  She is a woman, but will that be enough for women to hold their noses and actually vote for her?  In the end, they may not have any other choice.  She may be the democrat candidate by default.

demcans 3

demcans 4

demcans 14

Then we have number one (or 1A)…, former Senator and former Vice President Joe Biden…, another poster child for term limits and an “establishment” tool. “Sleepy, creepy, Uncle” Joe Biden is another guy who’s time has really passed.  His only claim to fame is that he was Barack Obama’s vice president, but former President Obama won’t even endorse him!  Plus Vice President Biden actually DID the things the democrats are trying to impeach President Trump for.  He may also end-up being the democrat candidate by default.

demcans 7

demcans 6

demcans 8

Whoever is left standing, you can be sure they’ll have the complete and undivided support of the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media,” along with George Soros and all of the other wealthy “America haters.”

FOUR MORE YEARS!  FOUR MORE YEARS!

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Senator Bernie Sanders and “the big lie(s).”

Watching some news clips recently from a couple of Bernie Sanders’ campaign speeches, Bernie impressed upon me the level of disdain he and many of his friends actually have for President Trump.

It is so apparent that they are all deathly afraid of President Trump and how he is able to drag them and their motives out into the sunlight.

They will literally say and/or do ANYTHING to delegitimize and obstruct him.

He began by stating that President Trump, “is the worst president in the history of the country.”

bernie 10

He then said that President Trump’s administration is, “the most corrupt administration in history.”

He then added that President Trump “is a pathological liar.”

Not just a liar, mind you, but a “pathological liar.”

We’ll get back to this pathological liar thing later.

anti bernie sanders memes Pretty Anti Government Jokes

The democrats and the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” certainly have pushed these three false narratives, but they are all undeniably unfounded by any measure. But this is the way of the socialist and fascist political establishment.

bernie 4

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” – Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister

I believe Joseph Goebbels would be proud of Bernie Sanders’ efforts in the regard!

bernie 1

Bernie then proceeded to accuse President Trump of being:

A racist.

A sexist.

A bigot.

A religious bigot.

A homophobe.

A xenophobe.

A transphobe.

And last but not least…, an Islamophobe.

Then, of course, we have a whole list of things President Trump is “anti.”

He’s anti-this, anti-that, anti-this and anti-that.

Is there ANY negative type of connotation that hasn’t been attached to President Trump?

And they complain about President Trump’s name calling!

The only name he ever called Bernie was “crazy!”

Now there’s a name I think you could make a case for!

bernie 9

bernie 7

bernie 6

bernie 11

WINNING!

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

The Washington Post…, “Democracy dies on its pages.” 

I’m responding to a recent article in The Washington Post titled, “Sarah Sanders Watch: ‘Mouthpiece for fascism’?”

The article is by Erik Wemple, a media critic for The Washington Post, whose tag line is “Democracy dies in darkness.”

It must be getting pretty “dark” over there at the old Washington Post.

sanders 4

In the article, Mr. Wemple whines about the White House Press Secretary, Sarah Sanders, not having had a traditional White House briefing in quite a while.

Do you really wonder why that is Mr. Wemple, or are you just pretending not to know?

Well…, in case it is the former, I’ll clue you in.

First of all, it’s not written anywhere that these press briefings have to occur at all.

Second, most of the media that attended these briefings were not interested in getting briefed.  They were only interested in attacking President Trump, his administration, and Sarah Sanders.

Is it any wonder this is one tradition The President isn’t too concerned about honoring?

Mr. Wemple then continues to whine that Sarah Sanders seems to prefer to discuss her talking points with more “sympathetic” Fox News interviewers.

sanders 3

I don’t think “Sympathetic” is quite the right word here.  I think I would go with the term “fair and balanced.”

It wasn’t too long ago that I can remember Obama’s press secretaries avoiding the reporters from Fox News as opposed to any of the remaining horde of truly “sympathetic,” liberal propaganda reporters.

I can also recall the Obama administration actually spying on reporters who didn’t play by his “swampy” rules…, but I digress.

Mr. Wemple then proceeds to dredge up the tired “obstruction of justice” topic…, again…, claiming, “The Mueller report documented close to a dozen instances of possible obstruction of justice by President Trump,” while claiming Mueller “did not charge any crimes in deference to Justice Department policy toward sitting presidents.”

If I’ve said this once I’ve said this a hundred times…, IF ROBERT MUELLER COULD HAVE CHARGED PRESIDENT TRUMP WITH A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G…, BELIEVE ME, HE WOULD HAVE.

IF ROBERT MUELLER COULD HAVE RECOMMENDED CHARGING PRESIDENT TRUMP WITH A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G…, BELIEVE ME, HE WOULD HAVE.

Mr. Wemple then continues to cry about Sarah Sanders “hitting back” at charges made by various democrats, and actually defending The President and his administration.

You do understand that is precisely what her job is don’t you Mr. Wemple?

sanders 2

He then refers to a tweet by Alec Baldwin (that wise old sage and ever on duty guardian of democracy…, cough, cough), where he referred to Sarah Sanders as a “mouthpiece-for-fascism…,” a claim Mr. Wemple obviously supports.

Fascism?

Fascism, Mr. Wemple?

Ok…, let’s talk about fascism and fascists a little bit.

Have you heard of The Poynter Institute, Mr. Wemple?  I’m sure you have, but most other people haven’t.  It’s kind of a well-kept and camouflaged secret.  In a nutshell, The Poynter Institute is a boot camp for liberal, socialist, fascist, “journalists.”  It’s the kind of “journalism” school that Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi Minister of Propaganda, could really appreciate, and a school that is well represented by many members of the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” who make Washington D.C. their home.

Oh…, and by the way…, was it Sarah Sanders who was pushing the false narrative of Russian collusion for the last 2 years, or was it the “liberal propaganda,” “mainstream” media?

Who again are the fascists attempting to control the media?

In addition…, who in “the media” are the ones accounting for over 90% negative articles concerning President Trump?  If you take out the positive stories (or at least the non-negative ones) by Fox News, that means the rest of “the media” is basically 100% negative 100% of the time.  And saying that doesn’t even cause me to flinch.

Who again are the fascists attempting to control the narrative through negative propaganda and by omission?

Your cover has been blown Eric Wemple.  Just like the cover has been blown for all of the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” since President Trump ran for president.

The “mainstream” media being anywhere close to fair and balanced is the problem here, not Sarah Sanders.

sanders 1

WINNING!

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑