#METOO? Apparently, there are women, and then there are WOMEN.

Yes folks…., we are being taught an important lesson by liberals about liberals, that not all women deserve equal justice under the law, and that some men are insulated from the justice they deserve.

Creepy Joe Biden, for example, is one of the “untouchable,” liberal, men who is allowed to get away with almost anything it seems.

adouble 5

According to Joseph A. Wulfsohn of Fox News, “The woman [Tara Reade] who has accused Joe Biden of a sexual assault in the early 1990s is calling out the media and several politicians being considered to join the former vice president on the 2020 ticket for ‘protecting a powerful man’ while attempting to ‘silence’ her in the process.”

Those politicians being senators, Kamala Harris, Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren.

adouble 1

‘“I’d like my history with [Creepy Joe] Biden to be examined in a dignified way that’s not slanted by political bias or sensationalized. I’d like a deeper conversation about the fact that sexual harassment and sexual assault do not have a political party, [or an] agenda,’ Tara Reade told Fox News in an interview Sunday. ‘It’s an equal opportunity offender. There are Democrat offenders as well as Republican offenders and I’m sure Independent and Green Party. I mean, it doesn’t matter what your party affiliation is, and it shouldn’t as far as the media coverage regarding claims.’”

It shouldn’t, but it definitely does.

“Reade, a former staffer for the then-Delaware senator, pointed to the favorable reporting on Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who came forward in 2018 during the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and accused him of an alleged assault that took place in the 1980s. Kavanaugh vehemently denied the allegations that were leveled against him at the time.”

adouble 13

‘“Blasey Ford, because it was a conservative candidate they were going to put in the Supreme Court, was treated with much more deference by most of the media outlets, although her experience was difficult as well. And she received threats and received her own pain,’ Reade said. ‘I’ve basically had no substantive support from women’s groups that are considered liberal or Democratic. I’ve had no support from any Democrat candidate, although I’ve reached out. And I’ve received either slanted reporting that ended up being talking points for Biden’s campaign or silence from the mainstream media. So that’s my contention and my concern.’”

That’s funny, because I can distinctly remember the liberal propaganda, fake news media attacking Judge Kavanaugh like a bunch of rabid dogs 24/7.

There is also a BIG distinction in that Blasey Ford’s accusations were against a then high schooler, Brett Kavanaugh, while Reade’s accusations are against a sitting U.S. Senator, and current presidential candidate, Joseph Biden.

adouble 3

adouble 4

Let’s take a look especially at Senator Kamala Harris, who has been silent regarding Tara Reade, but who was such a concerned and staunch supporter of women accusers when the accusations were against a conservative.

ACCORDING TO HER OWN U.S. SENATE WEBSITE, these are Senator Kamala Harris’ comments regarding Judge Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser Christine Blasey Ford:

“When Judge Brett Kavanaugh was first nominated, I said that he represents a direct and fundamental threat to that promise inscribed above the Supreme Court, ‘Equal Justice Under Law.’”

No concerns like that about Creepy Joe Biden, Senator Harris?

“In the weeks since then, the basis for my concern has been confirmed.”

Confirmed by what or by who?  Confirmed by the fake news media and promoted by political narrative driven democrats?

“Senate Republicans used raw power to rush an unfit nominee onto the Supreme Court when the American people have more questions than answers about Judge Kavanaugh’s suitability to serve.”

No questions at all about Quid Pro Quo Joe’s “suitability to serve” though?

“When Dr. Christine Blasey Ford came forward with serious and credible allegations of sexual assault, not only was she attacked by Senate Republicans, she was mocked by the President of the United States. The White House then prevented the FBI from investigating critical aspects of the allegations or interviewing key witnesses—not even permitting the FBI to interview Judge Kavanaugh and Dr. Ford.”

adouble 12

What makes Blasey Ford’s accusations “serious and credible,” but not Tara Reade’s?

Blasey Ford’s accusations were attacked explicitly because they were vague, unsubstantiated and uncorroborated.  Quite the opposite of Tara Reade’s accusations.

And what about any type of investigation, at all, FBI or otherwise, regarding Reade’s accusations?

“As a former prosecutor, I have led investigations and I have tried these cases in a courtroom. I have spent countless hours with assault survivors. And when I look at what has occurred over these few days, we have fallen short in fulfilling our constitutional duty to fully evaluate Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination. This process has been a disservice to Dr. Ford. This process was a disservice to survivors everywhere. And this process has been a disservice to the American people.”

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) speaks during the Senate Judiciary Committee's confirmation hearing of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trumpís nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court, on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Is it possible to observe anymore hypocrisy in one paragraph than we see here from Kamala Harris?

So, you obviously don’t consider Tara Reade a “survivor” or one of the American people, I guess, huh, Kamala?

Oh, I’m sorry.  I forgot those terms are only applicable to liberals.

“The Judge Kavanaugh the American people saw before the Judiciary Committee does not have the character, the temperament, or the judgment to sit on the highest court in our land. His own partisan, evasive, dishonest, and aggressive testimony demonstrates that we cannot trust him to be a fair and unbiased jurist. He is simply unfit. The Senate should have put partisanship aside and demanded better.”

Hey, at least Judge Kavanaugh was made to answer his accuser…, unlike Creepy Joe Biden, who has been given a complete pass thus far, and who’s campaign has just continued to deny, deny, deny and lie, lie, lie.

adouble 10

“It is now up to each of us to continue to fight for justice and equality and hold our government accountable.”

Your words are inspiring, Senator Harris, but the hypocrisy and disingenuousness is deafening.

Again, according to Wulfsohn, “The Biden accuser expressed hope that ‘the next kind of case’ like hers will be approached in a ‘more educated way and with emotional intelligence.’”

I certainly wouldn’t bet on that!

“Reade, a life-long Democrat, later called out the politicians on Biden’s VP shortlist over their ‘silence’ on her assault claim, including Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., who she had supported for president during the Democratic primary before supporting Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.”

‘“What I’d like to say to the slanted reporting where they are omitting details, where they are not investigating corroborating [testimony], what I would like to say to them at this point and some of the silence from some the candidates Kamala Harris, Amy Klobuchar, Elizabeth Warren that at this point, if you continue to silence me, if you continue to engage in protecting a powerful man without giving my case a closer look, you are complicit in rape,’ Reade declared.”

“The offices of Sen. Harris, Sen. Klobuchar, and Sen. Warren did not immediately respond to Fox News’ requests for comment.”

Hmmm, that’s odd.

“Earlier this month, Klobuchar was asked about Reade’s allegation but pointed to the reporting from The New York Times and concluded that her claim ‘has been investigated.’”

‘“He has said, and I agree with this, you’ve got to get to the bottom of every case and all allegations. I think The New York Times — I haven’t read all the stories. I read that one. Your viewers should read that,’ Klobuchar told MSNBC anchor Ari Melber. ‘It was very thorough. They interviewed people. And I have done a lot of work on this. I actually led the effort to change the rules in the U.S. Senate so that it is easier to bring these cases forward and so that we have taxpayers not paying for bad conduct.’”

‘“I think this case has been investigated. I know the vice president as a major leader on domestic abuse, I worked with him on that. And I think that, again, the viewers should read the article. It was very thorough.’”

Yes, Senator Klobuchar…, we all know how “thorough” The New York Times can be…, and slanted towards their liberal point of view.

And Senator Warren has been completely AWOL on this issue.  What an absolutely tireless defender of women she is!

“Reade’s story first resurfaced in an article in The Intercept on March 24. Podcast host Katie Halper then interviewed Reade, who said that in 1993, a more senior member of Biden’s staff asked her to bring the then-senator his gym bag near the U.S. Capitol building, which led to the encounter in question.”

‘“He greeted me, he remembered my name, and then we were alone. It was the strangest thing,’ Reade told Halper. ‘There was no like, exchange really. He just had me up against the wall.’”

“Reade said that she was wearing ‘a business skirt,’ but ‘wasn’t wearing stockings — it was a hot day.’”

“She continued: ‘His hands were on me and underneath my clothes, and he went down my skirt and then up inside it and he penetrated me with his fingers and he was kissing me at the same time and he was saying some things to me.’”

“Reade claimed Biden first asked if she wanted ‘to go somewhere else.’”

‘“I pulled away, he got finished doing what he was doing,’ Reade said. ‘He said: “Come on, man. I heard you liked me.”’”

adouble 2

Yes…, we’ve all heard the “come on, man” line before.

“Reade said she tried to share her story last year, but nobody listened to her. Earlier this month, she filed a criminal complaint against Biden with police in Washington, D.C.”

“Fox News reached out to the Biden campaign for comment on this story. The campaign referred Fox News to a statement earlier this month from Biden Deputy Campaign Manager Kate Bedingfield that said: ‘What is clear about this claim: it is untrue. This absolutely did not happen.’”

Well, I guess that takes care of that then.

adouble 6

‘“Vice President Biden has dedicated his public life to changing the culture and the laws around violence against women,’ Bedingfield said. ‘He authored and fought for the passage and reauthorization of the landmark Violence Against Women Act. He firmly believes that women have a right to be heard — and heard respectfully. Such claims should also be diligently reviewed by an independent press.’”

Yes, Ms. Bedingfield…, and that’s what makes Ms. Reade’s claims all the more disappointing…, all the more disgusting…, and all the more believable.

adouble 8

adouble 7

adouble 9

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Wooo! Was I watching “WrestleMania,” WWE Wednesday Night “SmackDown,” or the democrat debate?!

adebate 1

adebate 5a

adebate 6

Like WWE (World Wrestling Entertainment) superstar “Road Dogg” Jesse James says, “Oh, you didn’t know? You’re a$$ better call somebodyyyyy!”

And the democrats who should’ve “called somebody” were Michael Bloomberg and Amy Klobuchar.

adebate 10

Bloomberg should have called 911 and Klobuchar should have taken a page from “Who wants to be a Millionaire” and “asked the audience” or “phoned a friend!”

adebate 8

According to Mary Anne Marsh [Mary Anne Marsh is a Democrat political analyst and a principal at Dewey Square Group in Boston where she provides strategic counsel for Fortune 100 companies, non-profits and political campaigns.] for Fox News, “In fierce Democratic presidential debate, 1 winner and 5 losers.”

Ms. Marsh’s bio indicates that she is an extremely biased liberal, and I would argue the democrats had no winners in this debate.  The only real winner here was President Trump!

adebate 7

I felt her overall take on the debate, however, was pretty accurate.

“Multibillionaire Michael Bloomberg landed in Las Vegas like a highly anticipated show on the Strip. But when he took to the stage with five competitors for the Democratic presidential nomination Wednesday night, their debate immediately became an Ultimate Fighting Championship [UFC] match.”

“Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., landed the most blows and won the night [This is debatable. I would say she wasn’t really attacked by anyone because none of them feel she is someone to worry about anymore!]. Warren would not be ignored or denied [This means the debate moderators failed to stop her from being a blabber mouth and time hog.] Warren flattened Bloomberg out of the gate using his own words against the former New York City mayor and he never recovered. As a result, voters got to see the real Warren, who was the front-runner last fall. And they saw the real Bloomberg, not the filtered one seen on paid TV ads and in social media.”

Have you realized yet that Ms. Marsh is an Elizabeth Warren fan?

“Warren’s strong performance helped her at a time when she needs it most and hurt Bloomberg so badly that he may not recover.”

This I agree with.  The whole world saw that Michael “The Emperor” Bloomberg has no clothes!  He was unmasked as a fraud, a hack, and not ready for prime time.

In Marsh’s opinion, “There was one winner [Warren] and five losers at the end of the debate – Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont; former Vice President Joe Biden; Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota; former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg; and Bloomberg, who turned out to be the biggest loser of all.”

“With Bloomberg standing to her right Warren landed a left to the jaw with a shattering exchange using his own words about women against him. She then used his nondisclosure agreements, the stop-and-frisk tactic employed by police primarily against minorities when he was mayor, and his vast fortune estimated at more than $60 billion against him too.”

“Bloomberg’s performance was a disaster. He was not the Bloomberg of his ads in this debate – and that’s now a big problem for him.”

“Warren exposed the real Michael Bloomberg and it was not a pretty picture.”

“It was Warren’s relentless challenge to Bloomberg on a host of issues – including his treatment of women who worked for him and his refusal to release them from nondisclosure agreements – as well as his treatment of people of color with his stop-and-frisk policy.”

“Bloomberg’s attempts to apologize and explain only made the situation worse. His apology came off as more about convenience than sincerity – and that will register with voters too.”

“Finally, Bloomberg also sounded a lot like President Trump when asked about releasing his tax returns, raising issues about his lack of transparency.”

“Sanders, the self-described democratic socialist who represents Vermont was repeatedly questioned about his lack of transparency regarding his medical records, his recent heart attack and the cost of his “Medicare-for-all” plan.”

Mayor Pete “Buttigieg is the leader in delegates at this early stage from his strong finish in Iowa and New Hampshire. He used the debate to land a few blows on Sanders, with whom he’s locked in a delegate fight.”

“The former mayor also hit Klobuchar, who he is competing with for moderate voters…,” and they “… had a number of exchanges in their fight for moderate voters.”

I particularly liked when Mayor Pete referred to Klobuchar’s previous inability to name the president of Mexico, even though she is on trade and immigration committees in the Senate.

Her response was, “Are you mocking me?” and “Are you calling me dumb?” Obviously attempting put Mayor Pete on the defensive while trying to gain some sympathy for herself.

I would say, “If the shoe fits, wear it, Amy!”

Bam!

adebate 2

Former Vice-President “Biden did nothing to help himself. He looked like a tourist in Las Vegas rather than someone who should own the stage.”

Ha!

“Biden did little if anything to reassure voters he’s the best one to take on Trump or stem his slide in the polls. And that’s more bad news for Biden in this race.”

Bloomberg did manage to land a blow on Bernie, however, when he said, “Sanders, the best known socialist over here, happens to be a millionaire with three houses.”

Boom!

adebate 3

The truth hurts, right, Bernie?

The truth hurts in general for all of these democrat candidates.

And that’s the truth!

Wham!

adebate 4

I’m actually looking forward to the next democrat debate.

I’m sure Mini-Mike Bloomberg can’t say the same!

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

More “Swampy” Nursery Rhymes!

The Second Edition of MrEricksonRules’ “Swampy” Nursery Rhymes!

arhymes 8

I know you’ve all been waiting patiently for this.

Well, here it is!

This much anticipated second edition of my “Swampy” nursery rhymes pays tribute to the sad democrat presidential candidates still in the race.

arhymes 2

A farewell to Elizabeth Warren, aka “Pocahontas,” aka “the bag lady,” ala “There was an old woman who lived in a shoe.”

 

There was an old bag lady who thought she was cool,

She had so many supporters she started to drool;

Thoughts of becoming the president they grew in her head,

But her lying and stupidness quickly put that to bed.

 

arhymes 3

A Rhyme for “Crazy” Bernie, read to “It’s raining; it’s pouring.”

 

Bernie’s whining and roaring.

The OLD man is boring.

He may be the frontrunner after primary two,

But be prepared, Bernie, cuz they’re gonna screw you!

 

arhymes 5

A Tribute to another OLD friend, “Sleepy” Joe Biden, sung to “Hush, little baby don’t say a word.”

 

Hush, Creepy Joe-oe don’t Say a Word,

Cuz every time I hear you you sound like a turd.

 

And if your statements don’t make sense,

They’ll be ignored or blamed on Pence.

 

And if Barack won’t endorse your race,

Then that’s a real slap in your face.

 

And if you can’t actually win a state,

Then dropping out may be your fate.

 

And if your campaign just isn’t meant to be,

It’s not like a big surprise to me.

 

Barack said, “You don’t have to do this, Joe,”

You should have listened and just stayed home.

 

arhymes 1

Another ode to “Sleepy” Joe, sung to “Oh where, oh where has my little dog gone.”

 

Oh where, oh where has Sleepy Joe gone?

Oh where, oh where can he be?

With two 5th place finishes to start the race,

Oh where, oh where can he be?

 

Oh where, oh where has Sleepy Joe gone?

Oh where, oh where can he be?

He still thinks that he’s leading the pack, but,

Oh where, oh where can he be?

 

arhymes 4

My rendition of “Lazy Mary will you get up?” for Amy Klobuchar.

 

Lamey Amy, won’t you give up,

Won’t you give up, won’t you give up?

Lamey Amy, won’t you give up,

So early in the run-ning?

 

No, dear socialists, I won’t give up,

I won’t give up, I won’t give up.

No, dear socialists I won’t give up,

So early in the run-ning.

 

arhymes 7

And we can’t forget Mayor Pete!  Read to “Little Bo Peep.”

 

Ex-Mayor Pete has lost the blacks

And doesn’t know where to find them.

If he leaves them alone

They’ll never come home

And he won’t any more elections.

 

Ex-Mayor Pete, he searched for the blacks

But didn’t quite know how to find them.

He looked everywhere

From here and to there

But still couldn’t get them to vote for him.

 

Ex-Mayor Pete began to weep

And lay down to rest for a while

He fell fast asleep

While counting is black sheep

Then dreamt they came home with a smile.

 

I hope you enjoyed this second edition of MrEricksonRules’ “Swampy” Nursey Rhymes!

Stay tuned for my third edition in the near future.  I’m working on more good ones already!

WINNING!

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

Can these democrat presidential candidates, who are Senators, really be impartial jurors in the impeachment trial of President Trump?

At the start of the impeachment proceeding in The Senate, Chief Justice John Roberts administered an oath to all 100 senators as they swore to “do impartial justice” during President Donald Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

Every senator solemnly swore “that in all things pertaining to the trial of the impeachment of Donald John Trump, President of the United States, now pending, I will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws, so help me God.”

I’m sorry…, but what a bunch of liars!

And they swore to GOD to top it off!

ajurors 6

Be that as it may…, I’m specifically referring to the democrat senators who are currently presidential candidates…, Amy Klobuchar, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.

ajurors 2

By definition they are all opponents of President Trump, and they all have taken President Trump’s name in vain on a daily basis.

These three really expect us to believe they are able to “do impartial justice” where President Trump is concerned?

If these three had any honor or decency, they would recuse themselves from the impeachment trial and any Senate impeachment vote.

Wouldn’t that seem proper and reasonable?

The only problem being, we shouldn’t expect any of these three to behave properly or reasonably.

Not to mention the rest of the impeachment crazed democrats.

ajurors 3

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

What a motley crew (or “Libs Gone Wild!”): The 2020 Democrat presidential candidates!

Seriously?

This is the best group of candidates the democrats could come up with?

demcans 13

None of the current candidates conjure up any vision of them being “presidential,” with possible exception of Joe Biden.

I Predicted Hillary would run again in my blog, “I’m letting everyone know, again, that Hillary is going to run for President, again, in 2020.” from March 15, 2018, and that prediction is looking good, at least as a vice presidential candidate.

Anyway…, let’s take a look at the current crop of esteemed democrat presidential candidates, along with my official candidate classifications!

“On Life Support:” Kamala Harris and Corey Booker.  They seem to get quite a bit of media coverage, although they have been polling at 5% or less.  I believe the fact that they’re Black keeps them from falling into the next category.

“The Walking Dead:” Andrew Yang, Amy Klobuchar, Tulsi Gabbard, Julian Castro and Beto O’Rourke.  This group consistently polls less than 5%.  Beto and Julian are typically at 1% or less, yet I feel like Beto gets quite a bit of airtime.  Why would anyone care about what he says one way of the other?  Just sayin’.

Then we come to “The Cream of the Crappy Crop:” Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg.  These four typically poll with at least 13%, with Biden and Warren usually over 20%.

If Hillary doesn’t jump back into the race, or somebody else doesn’t jump into the race, one of these four will be the democrat presidential candidate for the 2020 presidential election.

Bwahahahahahahaha!

I’m sorry…, let’s get back to looking at the top 4 democrat presidential candidates.

Drumroll please…:

Number four…, Mayor Pete Buttigieg.  Of the top four, Mayor Pete is probably the most reasonable, policy-wise.  But is a small town mayor really ready to run our country?  Are we really ready for our “first lady” to be a man?  I don’t think so.

demcans 12

demcans 9

demcans 10

demcans 11

Number three…, Senator Bernie Sanders.  “Crazy” Bernie identifies as an “Independent” in The Senate, but he’s running for president as a democrat.  We knew he was a democrat all along.  Why was he misrepresenting himself the whole time?  He was obviously being disingenuous.  He seems like he’s a thousand years old, and he is not afraid to admit he’s a socialist at heart.  Your time has passed Bern.

demcans 2

Number two (or 1B)…, Senator Elizabeth Warren. When I see her, she reminds me of a “bag lady” who is wearing her best clothes and left her cart(s) outside. Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren is carrying around a lot of racial baggage, along with a lot of cultural hijacking for reasons of personal gain.  She is a woman, but will that be enough for women to hold their noses and actually vote for her?  In the end, they may not have any other choice.  She may be the democrat candidate by default.

demcans 3

demcans 4

demcans 14

Then we have number one (or 1A)…, former Senator and former Vice President Joe Biden…, another poster child for term limits and an “establishment” tool. “Sleepy, creepy, Uncle” Joe Biden is another guy who’s time has really passed.  His only claim to fame is that he was Barack Obama’s vice president, but former President Obama won’t even endorse him!  Plus Vice President Biden actually DID the things the democrats are trying to impeach President Trump for.  He may also end-up being the democrat candidate by default.

demcans 7

demcans 6

demcans 8

Whoever is left standing, you can be sure they’ll have the complete and undivided support of the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media,” along with George Soros and all of the other wealthy “America haters.”

FOUR MORE YEARS!  FOUR MORE YEARS!

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Hey Kemosabe…, “jump on it, jump on it!” Elizabeth Warren is a fraudulent Native American!

Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren has now become the democrats’ presidential front runner it would appear.

fraud 6

To celebrate her new standing in the polls, I think she deserves a little attention from MrEricksonRules!

First…, let’s quickly review Elizabeth Warren’s fraudulent Native American racial claims.

In April 1986, Warren listed herself as “Native American” on a Texas state bar registration form.

fraud 4

Warren also identified herself as “Native American” at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where she worked from 1987 to 1995.

fraud 7

Harvard Law School, where Warren taught before entering politics, referred to Warren as “the school’s only Native American professor” as recently as 1996.  Harvard then identified Warren as “Native American” on federal affirmative action forms every year until 2004.

fraud 5

I wonder if Harvard managed to avoid any tax penalties based on Warren’s designation?

Warren also listed herself as a minority in the Association of American Law Schools directory from 1986 to 1994.

Could you even imagine the outrage by “the media” if a similar discovery were made about President Trump?

There would be non-stop protests, a special prosecutor, Congressional hearings, more talk of impeachment, yada, yada, yada.

Am I wrong?

As it stands, the “mainstream media” has basically given Warren a pass on this, as have most of the other democrats.

fraud 8

Google, of course, is doing its part as well.

When we “Google” “Elizabeth Warren’s Native American claims” we get these top 10 results:

 

“Elizabeth Warren Apologizes at Native American Forum: ‘I …”

https://www.nytimes.com › 2019/08/19 › us › politics › elizabeth-warren-nat…

 

“Inside Elizabeth Warren’s courtship of Native American leaders”

https://www.cnn.com › 2019/08/18 › politics › elizabeth-warren-native-amer…

 

“Elizabeth Warren confronts handling of Native American … – Vox”

https://www.vox.com › policy-and-politics › elizabeth-warren-native-ameri…

 

“Warren Apologizes at Native American Forum – The Wall …”

https://www.wsj.com › Politics › Election 2020

 

“Elizabeth Warren apologizes over Native American heritage …”

https://www.latimes.com › politics › story › elizabeth-warren-native-americ…

 

“Sen. Elizabeth Warren at Native American forum: ‘I am sorry …”

https://abcnews.go.com › Politics › story

 

“Warren apologizes for heritage claim, woos Native Americans”

https://www.apnews.com › …

 

“Democratic hopeful Warren apologizes for Native American …”

https://www.reuters.com › article › us-usa-election-warren › democratic-ho…

 

“Elizabeth Warren releases plan aimed at uplifting Native …”

https://www.usatoday.com › story › news › politics › elections › 2019/08/16

 

Boy…, nothing really too critical of Warren there…, mostly apologetic and in the best light possible.  None of the sources would be considered “conservative” either.

Quite different from the search results that would show up for President Trump, I imagine.

Some of the keywords that would show up in a search like that, if it were President Trump, would be:

“LIAR,”

“RACIST,”

“FRAUD,”

“PHONY,”

“IMPOSTER,”

“CHEATER,”

“CON ARTIST,”

…, just for starters.

Am I wrong?

Recently, according to The Daily Caller, Warren said, “I am sorry for harm I have caused.  I have listened and I have learned a lot, and I am grateful for the many conversations that we’ve had together.”

Oh…, well, alrighty then!  Say no more, Elizabeth!  Your sins have been officially absolved by the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media!”

Bishop Zubik hears young woman's confession at pro-life youth rally and Mass in Washington

This absolution is, of course, reserved for liberals…, especially white, privileged, establishment, liberals. Being a woman on top of it all doesn’t hurt either.

fraud 9

Black, Hispanic, and especially Native American liberals do not normally receive this level of consideration.

As they say…, “you could look it up.”

fraud 14

fraud 13

fraud 12

fraud 11

fraud 10

fraud 3

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

Is Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren kidding or is she just “speaking with a forked tongue…, again?”

First of all, I debated whether or not it was even worth commenting about Senator Warren, since she’s only polling like 1%-2% support among democrats in her run for president…, but in the end, I just couldn’t let her get away with her false narratives and “fake news” (lies).

According to David Knowles, an Editor at Yahoo News, “Sen. Elizabeth Warren said Tuesday she would take a “hard pass” on a Fox News invitation to hold a televised town hall event, saying she didn’t want to help the conservative network build credibility with advertisers.”

Ha!  Now that’s a true “holier than thou” liberal elite attitude if I ever saw one!

So having you on their network, Elizabeth…, a person who has defrauded the Native Americans in our country…, and our college education system…, that would help “build credibility with advertisers?”

warren 5

Hmmm.

I think you’re just mad at the Fox News Network for holding you accountable for your racial and cultural identification scandals…, while the rest of the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” looked the other way…, but I could be wrong.

warren 4

“Four of her rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination — Bernie Sanders, Amy Klobuchar, Pete Buttigieg and Kirsten Gillibrand — have agreed to the events, in which candidates take questions from moderators and voters. Sanders and Klobuchar have already appeared.”

‘“I love town halls. I’ve done more than 70 since January, and I’m glad to have a television audience be a part of them. Fox News has invited me to do a town hall, but I’m turning them down—here’s why…— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) May 14, 2019”

‘“Hate-for-profit works only if there’s profit, so Fox News balances a mix of bigotry, racism, and outright lies with enough legit journalism to make the claim to advertisers that it’s a reputable news outlet. It’s all about dragging in ad money—big ad money,’ Warren wrote.”

Wow!  Pocahontas’ level of confusion is quite impressive!

warren 3

Have any networks demonstrated a more “hate-for-profit” approach than CNN and MSNBC?

No.

Take the last 2 years of fake Russian collusion coverage as well as the “all negative Trump news all the time strategy.”

And which networks exactly have displayed more bigotry and racism than CNN and MSNBC?

No one…, hands down.

And which networks exactly have been caught in intentional lies more often than CNN and MSNBC?

Again…, no one.

So please, Senator Warren…, take your “fake news” story walking.

warren 2

warren 8

‘“But Fox News is struggling as more and more advertisers pull out of their hate-filled space. A Democratic town hall gives the Fox News sales team a way to tell potential sponsors it’s safe to buy ads on Fox—no harm to their brand or reputation (spoiler: It’s not).’”

Ha!  So “Fox News is struggling?”

Hasn’t Fox News been the #1 cable news in the ratings for like…, forever?

Hasn’t Fox News been destroying CNN and MSNBC by HUGE margins for like…, forever?

She should quit drinking that “firewater!”  Just more “fake news.”

warren 6

“In March, citing what it called the ‘inappropriate relationship between President Trump, his administration and Fox News,’ Democratic National Committee chairman Tom Perez announced that he would not allow Fox News to broadcast any of the party’s 2020 presidential primary debates.”

Oh…, so “Mr. Tolerance,” Tom Perez won’t “allow” Fox News to be a part of the 2020 democrat presidential primary debates?  Because Fox “has an inappropriate relationship” with President Trump?

What?

warren 10

In Perez’s mind, it’s an “inappropriate relationship” because Fox treats The President fairly.

The President responded by tweeting, “Democrats just blocked @FoxNews from holding a debate. Good, then I think I’ll do the same thing with the Fake News Networks and the Radical Left Democrats in the General Election debates! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 7, 2019”

Huh?  You may want to get together with your “biased, liberal propaganda, fakes news media” friends, Mr. Perez, and rethink your position about the debates.

warren 9

WINNING!

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑