I’ve recently seen these words on signs posted here and there.
My question is, who exactly is this “US” this person is referring to?”
If “US” refers to illegal immigrants, I would agree.
If “US” refers to the Chinese Communist Party, I would agree.
If “US” refers to the Mexican drug cartels, I would agree.
If “US” refers to the people on Jeffrey Epstein’s client list, and pedophiles everywhere, I would agree.
If “US” refers to all of these trans drag queens, who feel obligated to put on their disgusting shows in front of children, I would agree.
If “US” refers to the parents who feel it is okay to expose their children to all of these trans drag queens, who feel obligated to put on their disgusting shows for children, I would agree.
If “US” refers to those who feel it’s okay to eliminate Israel, and all Jewish people in general, I would agree.
If “US” refers to those who want to “buddy up” to Iran, and subsidize terrorism around the world, I would agree.
If “US” refers to those who prefer to subsidize despots around the globe by getting our oil from them, as opposed to supplying our own oil here at home, I would agree.
If “US” refers to those who feel it is preferable to keep letting serial criminals off time and time again, without holding them accountable for their actions, I would agree.
If “US” refers to those who feel it is appropriate to transfer the debt of college students onto the backs of other hard working Americans, I would agree.
If “US” refers to individuals who believe it is okay to weaponize the “justice” department against those who may have different political views from the party in power, I would agree.
If “US” refers to those who make the killing of innocent unborn babies their top priority, and are willing to overlook all of these other sins in order to maintain this ability, I would agree.
If “US” refers to people who believe it is okay for biological males to complete in women’ sports and infringe upon women’s restrooms and locker rooms, I would agree.
If “US” refers to people who don’t mind paying 20%, 30%, 40%, 50% more for food, gas, rent, utilities, or mortgages, I would agree.
I’m sure “US” could apply to many other undesirable ideals and individuals as well. Please add to the list via a comment if you feel I’ve left some group off.
We have a lot of confused and ignorant people in this country, as well as those who would intentionally promote the downfall of our country and our way of life.
We cannot let these democrats win.
If the democrats win, we all lose.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Excuse me for being a little introspective today, but I recently heard this song again by Supertramp, and it made me think.
Here are the words to the song. What do you think?
“When I was young, it seemed that life was so wonderful
A miracle, oh, it was beautiful, magical
And all the birds in the trees, well they’d be singing so happily
Oh, joyfully, oh, playfully watching me
But then they sent me away to teach me how to be sensible
Logical, oh, responsible, practical
Then they showed me a world where I could be so dependable
Oh, clinical, oh, intellectual, cynical
There are times when all the world’s asleep
The questions run too deep
For such a simple man
Won’t you please, please tell me what we’ve learned?
I know it sounds absurd
Please tell me who I am
I said, now, watch what you say, they’ll be calling you a radical
A liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal
Oh, won’t you sign up your name? We’d like to feel you’re acceptable
Respectable, oh, presentable, a vegetable
But at night, when all the world’s asleep
The questions run so deep
For such a simple man…”
Life is really fairly simple.
But there are those that love to complicate things for their own benefit. “Those” being the government, elected and unelected, and “the haves.” These people are just interested in protecting their positions, power, and wealth.
Once we get to a certain age, we don’t have the luxury of being so care free anymore. We have responsibilities, and we are just trying to survive, and give ourselves and our families the best lives we can.
Most of us just want to feel safe and comfortable, but it seems that is too much to ask for now. “They” just can’t help themselves from demanding more, and more, until they ruin it for everyone, including themselves.
And, please be aware about the line that says “they’ll be calling you a liberal,” that conservatives are really the new “liberals,” while the democrats are all about being “the man” now.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Before I get started, I want to give my wife credit for this title. Nice one, Honey.
While we waited for “president” Biden to come out for his unscheduled press conference last Thursday night, my wife and I speculated what our fearless leader was going to say, given that earlier in the day the special counsel released their findings about their look into Biden’s handling of classified documents as a Senator, a vice president, a private citizen, and finally as president.
Would Biden say he had decided not to run for re-election?
Would Biden say he has decided to step down?
Glenn Thrush for The New York Times reported, “While Mr. Hur decided not to prosecute Mr. Biden, 81, [Did anyone ever actually think he would be prosecuted?] some of the reasoning he cited for his decision immediately created a new political crisis for the White House. In recounting his interviews with the president, Mr. Hur portrayed him as unable to remember key dates of his time in the Obama White House, or even precisely when his son Beau had died.”
“‘Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview with him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,’ Mr. Hur wrote.”
Is that really a thing? This is how they decide to prosecute people, or not, who have committed a crime(s)?
“The inquiry found that the president had willfully retained material after finishing his term as vice president and had shared sensitive information with a ghostwriter.”
So, Biden and his crew could argue against Mr. Hur’s findings, but then wouldn’t they be arguing against the reason Mr. Hur chose not to prosecute Clueless Joe?
Can they have it both ways?
Sorry. Stupid question.
It is a bit of a conundrum, but not for this bunch.
Instead of coming out in his interview and calmly and coolly thanking the special prosecutor for choosing to not prosecute him, while begging to differ on his cognitive assertions of him, he came out and attacked the special prosecutor and anyone else who questions his mental acuity, while then proceeding to confuse the President of Egypt with the President of Mexico.
I have to tell you, after watching Tucker Carlson’s interview of Vladimir Putin, and watching him talk off the script for over two hours, and seeing what an intelligent and sharp man he is, Mr. Putin, along with along with all of the other leaders and people around the world, must be having a good laugh at “president” Biden, America, and her people. You and I.
Thanks again “president” Biden.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
According to dictionary.com, “chaos” means: “A state of utter confusion or disorder; a total lack of organization or order.”
Sooo, just because some republicans have differing ideas and beliefs from other republicans, and some republicans have deemed a change in leadership is necessary, and they have pushed for that change, within the parameters of established processes and congressional procedures, the republicans are deemed to have thrown Congress into a state of “chaos?”
You can read about the democrat approved narrative yourself, as propagandized by NPR (National Public Radio), in this instance, by Claudia Grisales, Deirdre Walsh, and Lexie Schapitl, when they write, “Fate of House GOP leadership throws Congress into chaos.”
Please note that NPR is a federally funded media outlet. That means WE are paying for the pleasure of having the government spread its propaganda back on us.
Ok, let’s continue with NPR’s take on the whole situation.
“The U.S. House of Representatives remains virtually frozen as Republican tumult fuels scrambled plans over who could take over leadership of the lower chamber.”
Some would say, myself included, that “the U.S. House of Representatives remaining virtually frozen” would be a step in the right direction.
“Republican members huddled in meeting after meeting on Wednesday with potential candidates for speaker talking to the different factions of the party.”
As if this was somehow a negative attribute of the republicans. Democrats have never “huddled” in any backroom meetings before! Especially regarding a change in their leadership! That would be democrat heresy!
Who believes it’s healthy for everyone associated with a given political party to walk and think and vote in lock-step with every other person, in this case every other representative, of a given political party?
I sincerely hope you’re not nodding or have your hand up.
I think many of us can recall groups of political factions who preferred to walk in lock-step (goosestep) with each other 100% of the time.
‘“There’s scenarios where this could be going on for weeks,’ Rep. Garret Graves, R-La., told reporters steps off the House floor amid the competing meetings.”
And if it does, so what?
“There is a tension between some lawmakers who want a quick election for speaker to move on and those who caution the conference needs to coalesce around someone who can bring all the factions together and avoid another embarrassing debacle on the House floor with multiple rounds of balloting.”
“Embarrassing debacle?”
Really?
Following congressional process and procedure to elect a new speaker of the house is an “embarrassing debacle?”
Maybe to the democrat “goose steppers,” but not the rest of us.
A “tension between some lawmakers” should be viewed as a natural, and a healthy thing, politically speaking. Who says all factions have to be brought together? Engaging in compromise used to be a huge part of getting things done in government. We have now arrived at a point where a simple majority just shoves what they want down everyone else’s throat.
Steve Scalise, a ranking republican representative from Louisiana, and one of the potentially new speakers, said, ‘“Our strength as a Conference comes from our unity, and we have seen when we unite as a Conference, we can deliver wins for the American people. Now we need to take those unified positions and work to extract conservative wins from the Democrat Senate and White House by leveraging upcoming deadlines. While we need to be realistic about what can be achieved, if we stay united, we can preserve leverage for the House to secure tangible wins in our impending policy fights.’”
What he is talking about is that the facts of the matter are, if the republicans want to accomplish anything, they have to vote in lock-step with each other in order to defeat the democrats, who have already mastered the lock-step routine.
It’s a sad state of affairs, but it is reality.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
In the last few days I’ve seen “President” Biden (please recall that we should always put the word “president” in quotes when referring to “President” Biden, since he didn’t actually win the election) show up on the United Auto Workers (UAW) picket line, in Detroit, touting his support for them, and working middle-class Americans, who “built this country,” in general.
Then I see “Scranton” Joe speaking at a fund raising event in Arizona, crying about how extreme MAGA republicans in Congress are about to shut down the government, and about how bad this would be for those same working middle-class Americans.
Sooo, it’s okay to shut down the American auto industry, and all of the businesses that support the auto industry, but it’s not okay to shut down (which really isn’t a shutdown anyway) the federal government, which working middle-class Americans get very little help from, and in fact, the federal government which is making life miserable for the average working middle-class American citizen (regarding the budget crushing prices of gas, groceries, utilities, rent, and mortgage rates), while it shovels OUR tax money to Ukraine and the support of millions of illegal immigrants.
Excuse me “Scranton” Joe, but you and your pathetic administration, along with your disingenuous and anti-American democrat party, can kiss all of our working middle-class American a$$es!
And you can throw in the disgusting establishment RINOs in Congress, and the derelict, negligent, and equally culpable mainstream media as well.
In reality, you and the rest of the democrats represent evil, death, crime, lies, and corruption.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Imagine your grandpa is the president of the United States, and your grandma is the first lady of the United States, but they have chosen to pretend you don’t exist.
It’s a sad and shameful picture that no innocent child deserves.
I mean, we should allow Hunter to act like the piece of human garbage he is, but do Joe and Jill have to jump into that dumpster with him?
Jonathan Turley, for Fox News, a professor of public interest law at George Washington University and a practicing criminal defense attorney, reports that, “The Biden family refuses to acknowledge Hunter Biden’s 4-year-old daughter, and that Hunter Biden’s twisted attempts to keep his little girl from using his name are now in a new realm, and that the viciousness of the Biden family toward Hunter’s daughter, 4-year-old Navy Joan borders on monstrous.”
“Monstrous.”
That’s pretty harsh wording, coming from Jonathan Turley, who is normally pretty measured with his assessments.
You may be thinking, “Oh, here comes another gold digging woman, trying to make a quick buck.” But it was Hunter who initiated this latest courtroom battle, as he seeks to lower his child support payments.
Of course he does. What a guy!
“Hunter Biden will finally make it to Arkansas. The state itself is not a favorite Biden family destination but there is one thing that would ordinarily be an attraction: [Hunter] Biden’s daughter Navy Joan.”
Being a grandparent myself, it is hard to understand the type of people who would turn their backs on their granddaughter.
“In the Biden family, the 4-year-old girl remains ‘she who shall not be named’ literally. Not only has President Biden refused to refer to her as a grandchild or even include a Christmas stocking with the other children, her father Hunter is fighting to prevent her from using the Biden name. Indeed, the only reason that Hunter is coming to the same state that his daughter lives in is to seek to reduce his child support.”
Hard to imagine anyone would want to “use” the Biden name, but be that as it may…
“The viciousness of the Biden family in dealing with this little girl is only matched by that of the media. Reporters who profess to support women and denounce deadbeat dads have either ignored this story or belittled her mother Lunden Roberts.”
Hmmm, that’s odd…, well, not really.
“Roberts is widely dismissed as a ‘former stripper.’ That appears to be how she met Hunter, but it is often used to paint her in the same way that the media gleefully reported on former first lady Hillary Clinton denouncing the women who were involved with her husband as mere ‘bimbo eruptions.’”
Being just a little bit judgmental, are we?
I guess only transsexuals in drag are currently allowed to be “exotic” dancers.
“Yes, Roberts was an exotic dancer. She used that job to go to one of the most expensive colleges in the country, George Washington University, where I teach.”
“The reason the media ignores Navy Joan’s mother, Lunden Roberts, is that it wants to ignore what the Bidens have done.”
“When she became pregnant, she decided to have her child and raise her on her own. She has raised this child without a father and fought one of the most powerful families in the world.”
Many of us would call this commendable, and brave.
“When Navy Joan is older, there is every reason for her to be proud of the struggle that her mother went through in seeking a college education and raising her against all odds.”
“Despite Joe Biden long campaigning against deadbeat dads, his son had refused to acknowledge that he was the father of Navy Joan.”
Deadbeat dads are easy targets…, until your son, your family moneymaker becomes one.
“After a court forced him to confirm his paternity through DNA testing, he continued to fight paying support for his child. Hunter’s delay and evasion of filings and depositions led a court to repeatedly threaten sanctions.”
Typical Biden family behavior, actually.
Didn’t this court realize who they were dealing with, and that normal laws don’t apply to the Bidens?
C’mon, man!
“However, the effort to bar this child from using the Biden name has moved this scandal from the realm of hypocrisy to monstrosity.”
“It is hard to imagine the pain that this child will experience upon learning of how the Bidens erased any reference to her and fought even her ability to claim to be a member of their family. (Even the Bidens’ dogs and cats got stockings at Christmas, but not their granddaughter Navy Joan, whom they have never asked to even see, let alone support.)”
“If one were to combine all of Hunter’s influence peddling, drug abuse, orgies and prostitution controversies, they would not hold a candle to the utter depravity shown toward this little girl.”
You mean the “alleged” influence peddling, drug abuse, orgies and prostitution controversies, right?
All of these infractions seem to be pretty common knowledge now, however.
“Despite assembling a new Legion of Doom of high-priced lawyers and advisers, Hunter is claiming that he simply cannot meet demands for child support.”
“Given his opposition to such support for years and reported millions in foreign dealings, it would seem transparently absurd.”
“It is even more difficult to accept this excuse as he jets between his luxurious mansion in Malibu to digs at the White House. The public reportedly pays more for his security in his mansion than he does for monthly support for his daughter.”
Aren’t we nice?
“There is, however, a crushing karmic aspect to Hunter being forced to appear in Arkansas. His efforts to limit his child support may have backfired and could prove costly.”
In the end, I seriously doubt it.
“Hunter has struggled to conceal his finances, including money that he received from alleged influence peddling. Now the court is considering the laptop as possible evidence in millions of past assets. While a U.S. Attorney in Delaware is exploring criminal charges and House committees are looking into the influence peddling, his fight against this toddler could force a decision on the authenticity of the laptop.”
Is that what you call slow-walking and looking the other way…, “exploring?”
“In the last hearing, Hunter’s counsel tried again to maintain deniability.”
“Here is the exchange after Judge Meyer referenced Garrett Ziegle as a potential expert witness on the contents of the laptop:”
“Langdon: ‘There has never been, to my knowledge, an acknowledgment that this so-called laptop, he continuously calls it Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop …’”
“Meyer: ‘Well, let’s clear that issue up right now. Is it your client’s laptop or not?’”
“Langdon: ‘Your honor, I’m not involved in all of that stuff. It’s not my client’s laptop as far as I know.’”
“Meyer: ‘Is it your client’s position, you’re representing to this court, that it is not his laptop?’”
“Langdon: ‘Your honor, I am not in a position to even begin to answer that question.’”
Deny, deny, deny. Lie, lie, lie…, straight out of the old democrat playbook.
“It is bizarre to continue this obfuscation years after the release of the laptop. Hunter is facing the use of the laptop as evidence in this case as well as the federal prosecution and House investigations. Yet, his counsel is still claiming ignorance as to whether it is authentic.”
“It is the continuation of a long campaign of disinformation. Before the 2020 election, the media repeated the false claim that the Hunter Biden laptop was likely ‘Russian disinformation.’”
“Despite the denial of American intelligence and self-verifying emails on the laptop, the media accepted without question [and promoted] the dubious claims of former intelligence figures organized by longtime Democratic operatives.”
“It worked beautifully.”
“It was not until two years later that NPR, the New York Times and other legacy media outlets got around to telling the public the truth.”
Well, kinda.
“Hunter has long refused to acknowledge ownership of the laptop. When asked years ago by CBS News, about its authenticity, he shrugged and said, ‘There could be a laptop out there that was stolen from me. It could be that I was hacked. It could be that it was Russian intelligence.’”
Yeah, “Maybe it’s something really cool that we don’t even know about. You know?”
“I thought we were in the trust tree, were we not?”
“In some ways, it is a continuation of Hunter’s long denial of his child’s paternity. Yet, the DNA did not lie.”
“Hunter could now be forced to accept this laptop as his own. That could prove far more costly than the child support that he is seeking to avoid in Arkansas.”
Like I said before, I doubt it. And if it does, Navy Joan will be in college, and Creepy Joe will just be a bad memory by that time.
“None of this, of course, will get Navy Joan a stocking on next year’s Biden family fireplace. According to Joe Biden, she is not one of his grandchildren despite being fathered by his own son.”
“Nor will this make Hunter Biden a better person. However, if she succeeds in using the Biden family name, she will certainly prove the best of the lot.”
You can say that again.
And by far!
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
According to Michael Ryan of “The Heartlander (a media/news company, based in Kanasa City, Missouri),” ‘“The Biden administration is in fact the ‘middleman’ in a child smuggling operation at the U.S border, for which someone needs to go to jail,’ says Sen. Josh Hawley.”
Oh, really? And, again, where is the mainstream media on this?!
Their propaganda by omission has once again made them all co-conspirators to this whole evil operation.
“Whistleblower Tara Lee Rodas told a House hearing Wednesday of the ‘sophisticated network’ of child immigrant smuggling she witnessed at a Department of Health and Human Services emergency intake in Pomona, California.”
‘”I thought I was going to help place children in loving homes,’ she testified to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security and Enforcement. ‘Instead, I discovered that children are being trafficked through a sophisticated network that begins with recruiting in their home country, smuggled to the U.S. border, and ends when [the Office of Refugee Resettlement] delivers a child to a sponsor.’”
Some of these “sponsors” are going straight to hell with gasoline underwear on, right along with their accommodating government cohorts!
‘“Some sponsors are criminals and traffickers and members of transnational criminal organizations. Some sponsors view children as commodities and assets to be used for earning income. This is why we are witnessing an explosion of child labor trafficking.’”
Can there be any doubt that Joe Biden and his friends are the devil’s pawns?
Seriously.
And, can there be any doubt that anyone who could possibly support and provide cover for this behavior are puppets of the devil as well?
I say no. No doubt.
“Is the Biden administration really the middleman in a child trafficking enterprise? ‘Yes, absolutely,’ Hawley told the Heartlander in an interview Thursday. ‘And you can see that in the numbers. The Biden administration changed the rule to allow kids to be smuggled across the border. Now we’ve had over 300,000 of them, 300,000 who have been smuggled across the border. Almost 100,000 of those are now lost to the Biden administration.’”
Lost?!
100,000 lost?!
‘“They just turn them over to sponsors that often are smugglers, child traffickers. And, now they’re gone.’”
Gone?!
“Hawley says the immigrant children are being forced into illegal child labor; being forced to work overnight shifts in factories; being denied food and education; and even being sex-trafficked.”
‘“That’s what this administration is allowing to happen,’ the Missouri senator said. ‘It’s modern-day slavery, and they are facilitating it. They are just facilitating it because they want that border open.’”
Because they [the democrats and RINO establishment republicans] want the border open, and because they’re a bunch of evil, disgusting, shameful, pedophiles.
‘“There needs to be an FBI investigation into what’s happened at (the Department of Homeland Security) and Health and Human Services. This administration is allowing this. And No 2, the FBI needs to go and get every one of these kids that’s now been forced into slavery.’”
Ah, yes…, another investigation.
And, don’t hold your breath waiting for the FBI to do much, besides raid Donald Trump, harass other conservatives, monitor concerned parents, and infiltrate Christian churches.
Sorry, kids, but you better get used to whatever type of exploited situation you find yourself in, because “the cavalry” ain’t coming from Pedo Joe, the FBI, or any others of his and his partners in crime.
“Why isn’t this a bigger story, in a news media that scorched then-President Trump for having kids in ‘cages,’ when in truth they were holding facilities created by the Obama administration?”
‘“Oh, because since the Biden administration is doing it, Democrats now have no interest,’ Hawley says. ‘Suddenly the party of protecting kids’ safety, which is what they said years ago now, is literally turning children over to slave traffickers in our country. They’re allowing children to be exploited. They’re allowing children to be sold into slavery.’”
‘“It’s unbelievable, and they just couldn’t care less because it’s their patron saint, Joe Biden, who’s doing it. It is wrong. [“Wrong” is the nicest possible word you could use here.] They need to be held accountable. There are people who need to go to jail for this, and it needs to start with an FBI investigation.’”
An FBI investigation into child trafficking by the Biden administration?
Like I said, sorry, kids, but you better get used to whatever type of exploited situation you find yourself in, because “the cavalry” ain’t coming from Pedo Joe, his corrupt FBI, or any other of his partners in crime.
Joe Biden and his administration are guilty of being complicit in thousands, and thousands, of child slavery and child abuse cases.
ILLEGITIMATE JOE BIDEN AND HIS ADMINISTRATION ARE GUILTY OF BEING COMPLICIT IN TENS OF THOUSANDS CHILD SLAVERY AND CHILD ABUSE CASES!!!
And, why aren’t the republicans making a bigger deal out of this?
Could there possibly any government policy and activity more heinous and disgusting than this?
The republicans in The House and The Senate need to insist this situation be investigated and addressed RIGHT NOW, and bring the government to a standstill until it is.
RIGHT NOW!!!
There just can be NO tolerance or any type of middle ground with this kind of evil.
NONE.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
I get really tired of Illegitimate Joe, and all of his friends, constantly referring to MAGA Republicans in a derogatory manner.
What part of “Make America Great Again” do you have a problem with?
I’m proud to consider myself someone who wants to return our country to greatness.
We definitely aren’t there now.
In order to combat the democrats’ derogatorily “pigeon holing” American patriots as MAGA Republicans, I say we should start referring to democrats as “those DARN democrats!”
Destroying America Right Now democrats.
It’s time to stand-up against those DARN democrats!
It’s time to let those DARN democrats know that we, the patriotic, loyal, American people, won’t idly stand by and watch them systematically undermine our great nation.
We now realize that the actions of these DARN democrats are intentional, and not a matter of simple stupidity.
Those DARN democrats are destroying America right now.
Let’s make DARN democrats a thing, and make it stick to them like a badge of dishonor!
Everyone has my permission to use this term!
Let’s make it go viral!
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
I realize we have lived by the mantra, “one person, one vote,” for a long time, but, is it really fair that each person’s vote counts the same?
Before you go getting all defensive and righteous, please consider the case I am about to make.
First of all, who could vote, how we vote, and how the votes are counted, has changed numerous times in our country’s history, sometimes for the better, and sometimes for the worse. The voting process is not written in stone, and fundamental changes are not unprecedented.
Should everyone’s vote count the same? Well, if you owned the majority of stock in a company, would you allow others who have not invested anything, or very little, into the company to make decisions about it? That answer would be, NO.
Should people who have no, or at least very little, “skin in the game” be allowed to direct how the game is played? Well, to a certain extent, yes, but generally NO. A large number of minor contributors could still override the larger contributors, however.
Should everyone, every adult American citizen that is, get one vote? That answer would still be, YES.
But, should all votes count the same?
Why shouldn’t the people that are paying more of the bills have more of a say?
Our country is at a tipping point.
When the “takers” outnumber the “givers,” this quickly becomes a death spiral for the country, and paves the way for a more socialist way of life.
Did you know that in the first presidential election of 1789, only land owners were allowed to vote?
What are your thoughts about this whole subject now?
Consider this…, California is in the process of charging for electrical power use based on the customers’ level of income. The more income you have, the more you’ll pay for the same electrical usage. Is there any doubt this is going to happen? Is there any doubt that this type of graduated payment system is going to spread throughout the country, and into different types of payments for a wide range of goods and services? That answer would be, NO. NO DOUBT.
So, how would this new, fairer, voting process work?
This is my initial proposal:
Each voter would be given credit for paying $500 in federal taxes, as a baseline.
Each voter would then be given credit for all federal income taxes paid the prior tax year, in addition to the initial $500 credit. This total taxes paid amount would then be adjusted by any additional taxes paid or tax refunds received via that year’s tax return, to arrive at a total voter credit amount. Note: opting to pay additional federal taxes during a voting year, would of course, still be allowed, but this additional taxes paid amount would not increase the voter credit amount. Only taxes paid towards required taxes to be paid would count.
At the time of the election, each voters’ voting credit amount would be tabulated and credited to whichever person or question they decide to vote for.
In the end, the candidates with the larger tax dollars paid totals would win the election.
Please remember, this voting credit is not based on wealth, it’s based on the amount of federal tax paid.
We are always told that “rich” people pay less taxes than school teachers, their secretaries, etc. Well, if that really is the case, then the vote will be well represented under this new scenario.
Personally, I would definitely not be considered “rich,” nor do I pay an exorbitant amount of tax, relatively speaking, so this “voting credit” proposal would not particularly benefit me, but I can still acknowledge the basic fairness of it.
This proposal will, of course, NEVER actually happen, but stranger things have happened!
159 million votes were tabulated in the 2020 election, when there were only 133 million registered voters!
An Uncle Fester knock-off was elected to the Senate from Pennsylvania!
Drag queens are now allowed to perform X-rated shows for young children, and concerned parents are the ones targeted as domestic terrorists by the DOJ/FBI!
Roe v. Wade was actually overturned by The Supreme Court!
And…, well, you get the idea.
Stay thirsty my friends, and let me know what YOU think of this revolutionary idea.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Prophetic lyrics from the song “Another Brick in The Wall” by the band Pink Floyd (1979. That’s 44 years ago!):
“We don’t need no education
We don’t need no thought control
No dark sarcasm in the classroom
Teachers leave them kids alone
Hey! Teachers! Leave us kids alone!
All in all it’s just another brick in the wall.
All in all you’re just another brick in the wall.”
So, who’s “another brick in the wall,” and what’s “the wall?”
In my mind, “the wall” is the metaphorical “wall,” or political construct, of misinformation, disinformation, and the promotion of an anti-constitutional, fascist, government.
Also, in my opinion, you’re currently “a brick” in that “wall,” if you (in no particular order)…:
…Condone schools indoctrinating our children towards a particular political activism
…Condone teachers and schools acting behind the backs of parents
…Condone the democrat weaponization of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
…Believe it was okay for the FBI to raid, with over a couple dozen heavily armed agents, former President Trump’s home, but not the homes, or offices of our current president, or other former presidents
…Believe law-abiding and responsible gun owners should be disarmed, while believing criminals will follow any type of additional gun laws
…Believe that “climate change” is the biggest problem we currently face
…Believe that our government generally tells us the truth
…Believe that the mainstream media generally tells us the truth
…Believe that Covid-19 mandates really “followed the science,” were justified, and that it was a pandemic of the unvaccinated
…Believe that there is no problems with our current election systems, procedures, and accountability
…Believe that criminals have more rights than law-abiding citizens, and that they deserve to be released again, and again, and again to repeatedly victimize innocent citizens
…Believe pedophilia (the sexual abuse of children) is an acceptable lifestyle choice
…Condone the abortion of (the ruthless and brutal killing of) babies right up to the moment of birth (which currently occurs about 3,000 times a day)
…Promote divisive racism, and use racism as an explanation for virtually every problem we face as a country
…Are willing to commit economic suicide here at home, in an effort to weaken our world standing
…Believe that allowing millions and millions of illegal immigrants to flood our country is acceptable
…Don’t support the continued construction of an actual wall along our southern border
…Believe it is acceptable for our country to provide a multitude of benefits to illegal immigrants, while we already have a severe homeless problem, and a dereliction of our responsibilities to our veterans
…Don’t really believe most of these things, but promote this evil ideology for monetary gain anyway
I’m sure I have left out many additional reasons one could be considered a “brick in the wall.” If you’d like to add to the discussion, please leave me a comment, which myself and others reading the blog could consider.
I hope you’re not a “brick.”
If you think you might be, remember, it’s never too late to walk away from the “dark side.”
It is all of our duties to continue to fight against the construction off this metaphorical “wall,” and to fight against the “bricklayers” who continuously try and keep building it.
I know it can get tiring at times, but these “bricklayers” never take a day, or an hour, or even a minute off, so we can’t either.
Please note that anyone from technically any political party can be a “brick in the wall,” but that these characteristics are typically in-line with the democrat party ideology and narrative.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please share them, and please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Mr. Erickson Rules! 