Is our response to the coronavirus unrealistic?

I see that this event is getting cancelled, and that school is closing down, and these games are being suspended, and any plans that involve interactions with people are being changed.

We’re wearing masks, washing our hands 20 times a day, and consuming hand sanitizer like never before.

Is it all really necessary?

Are these new “health” practices going to end up being more harmful than helpful?

I mean, the regular old annual flu is way more dangerous than the coronavirus is.

Are we setting a precedent now where we’re going to implement all of these travel bans and event cancellations and school closures every new flu season?

How can we not now?

How can we pretend one is more dangerous than the other?

How can we put all of these restrictions in place to avoid one virus but not another?

Does that make any sense?

Why have we been willing to just go about our normal everyday lives with the flu virus lurking out there, behind every cough, every sneeze, every handshake, and all of our everyday interactions?

Why is risking getting the flu any less risky than getting the coronavirus?

Why were we one day completely okay with the potential of catching the flu and the next day completely freaking out over the possibility of catching something that’s not even as bad?

Oh…, and just a reminder…, during the 2018-2019 flu season [November thru April, or about six months], 647,000 people were hospitalized and 61,200 died.”

And that’s only in the U.S.

The seasonal flu kills between 291,000 and 646,000 people worldwide each year, according to estimates.

Again…, it doesn’t make any sense.

Worldwide 4,756 people have died due to the coronavirus as of today.

But making sense is not the strong suit of the democrats or their co-conspirators, the liberal propaganda, fake news media.

It is not a requirement either.

In fact, a situation like this is a perfect one for the democrats and their co-conspirators, the liberal propaganda, fake news media.

Why?

Because it’s a situation that The President can’t win.

Have we been able to eliminate the flu?

No.

Will we be able to eliminate the coronavirus?

Probably not.

And certainly not anytime soon.

And as long as the coronavirus hangs around, the democrats and their co-conspirators, the liberal propaganda, fake news media can stand back, whip up the hysteria, and take pot shots at him.

Boy…, the democrats and their co-conspirators, the liberal propaganda, fake news media friends are sure desperate to gain political control over this country again, aren’t they?

They are just hell-bent on destroying this country and our way of life.

That’s exactly why we have to stand strong and make sure they don’t get the chance.

At some point, people will get tired of living in fear and living in a bubble, and they’ll say screw it, just like they had been doing, and they’ll go back to living their lives again, and maybe they’ll get the flu along the way.

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article. From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

March 13, 2020 2

Aaaaaaaand, the Dems are stuck with Angry Joe!

Ha!

At this point, it looks like the democrats have painted themselves into a corner with Joe Biden.

If President Trump was verbally tripping all over himself and demonstrating the confusion Angry Joe does on a regular basis…, you can be sure the democrats would be trying to enact the 25^th amendment to The Constitution, regarding declaring the president “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, thus transferring the authority of the president to the vice president.”

But, since we’re talking about “Swampy Joe” here, the democrats and their co-conspirators, the fake news media, will continue to either downplay Angry Joe’s forgetfulness and confusion, or just ignore it altogether.

The democrats are “all in” with Creepy Joe, and they’re holding a pair of deuces!

Giving them the odds of winning with a pair of deuces may be a little generous…, except you know the democrats will have a card or two up their sleeve!

Anyway, soooo…, after having 3 years of being able to come up with potential candidates.

After all of the campaigning.

After all of the debates.

After all of the caucuses and primaries.

After all of this…, the democrats have decided that Joe Biden is the best they have to offer?

Old, Senile, and confused Joe Biden?

Sleepy Joe Biden?

Creepy Joe Biden?

Quid Pro Quo Joe Biden?

And now, Angry Joe Biden?

This is who the democrats have chosen to rally behind?

There will be a lot of pressure now for Bernie Sanders to bow out of the race, as democrats will want to try and keep Angry Joe’s actual voter interaction and his actual speaking time to a minimum, in an attempt to minimize his gaffe factor. They especially want Bernie to call it quits before the upcoming debate in Phoenix, Arizona, on March 15^th.

Money is not an object for the establishment democrats…, and Bernie stands to become a very wealthy man if he chooses to play ball and become a “team player.”

The only problem with the democrats’ strategy is Quid Pro Quo Joe is eventually going to have to go toe to toe with President Trump.

And that, my friends, is not going to be a pretty sight for Angry Joe, and democrats in general.

WINNING!

FOUR MORE YEARS!

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

March 11, 2020 0

Here’s the deal, Joe…, you’re a hot mess!

Mark Moore for The New York Post says, “Former Vice President Joe Biden got into a heated argument with a worker during a tour of an auto plant under construction in Detroit on Tuesday, at one point telling the hard hat-wearing man he was ‘full of s–t’ and calling him a ‘horse’s a–.’”

Way to go, Joe! You sure know how to schmooze ‘em!

“Biden, the front-running Democratic presidential candidate, was making his way through a crowd when the construction worker asked him if he was ‘actively trying to end our Second Amendment right and take away our guns.’”

‘“You’re full of s–t,’ Biden shot back.”

To all of our liberal friends out there…, it’ll sure be nice to restore a level of decency in our public discourse with a President Biden, won’t it?

‘“I support the Second Amendment,’ Biden continued. ‘The Second Amendment, just like right now if you yell fire, that’s not free speech. From the very beginning, I have a shotgun, I have a 20-gauge, 12-gauge, my sons hunt. … I’m not taking your gun away at all.’”

What? “Yell fire,” “free speech,” “I have a 12-gauge, a 20-gauge,” “my sons hunt.”

What is this pile of disconnected thought?

And we have to put up with another 9 months of this?

The democrats’ new campaign slogan for Sleepy Joe should be, “Just shut up and vote for Biden!”

“The guy confronts him, claiming a video shows Biden saying he would take people’s guns away as did former Texas congressman Beto O’Rourke, a one-time presidential candidate who last week endorsed Biden.”

“I did not say that. That’s not true. I did not say that,” the former veep said.

Have you heard of smartphones, Joe?

Are you aware they can record videos?

Are you aware that when someone records you on their phone, they can share that with other people so they can watch it too?

Here’s the link to the video the worker was talking about:

https://youtu.be/oVGykWCsiG8

Now what did you say about this, again, Joe?

“I did not say that. That’s not true. I did not say that,” the former veep said.

‘“It’s a viral video,’ the guy said.”

‘“It’s a viral video like the others one they’re putting out that’s simply a lie,’ Biden replied.”

You seem to have a real problem “misremembering” recent events, Joe.

“But the worker insisted that it was Biden’s voice in the video.”

‘“Wait, wait, wait, wait, we’ll take your AR-14s away,’ Biden told him.”

Quid Pro Quo Joe’s level of confusion with this guy is impressive!

AR-14s?

And then he says he will take his guns away!

C’mon, Joe, what is it? Are you taking them or not?

‘“Wait, wait, wait, wait, we’ll take your AR-14s away,’ Biden told him.”

‘“This is not ok,’ the worker replied.”

‘“Don’t try me, pal,’ Biden shot back. ‘Do you want to go outside?’”

Ha! Now he’s threatening the guy and wanting to go outside and fight him!

And the libs complain about President Trump?!

All President trump does is come up with funny nicknames and call the media “fake news,” which it is!

That being said…, can you even imagine the fake news’ reaction if this was President Trump saying and doing this stuff instead of Creepy Joe?

We would never hear the end of it.

As it is, the fake news media will downplay the incident, make excuses for Sleepy Joe, and then just ignore it altogether.

‘“You’re working for me, man,’” the auto worker continued.

‘“I’m not working,’ Biden said. ‘Give me a break, man, don’t be such a horse’s a–.’”

Joe seems to misunderstand the whole concept of being a public “servant.”

Excuse me “Angry Joe,” but I think we all know who the real “horse’s a-s” is!

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

March 11, 2020 0

I see CNN has finally posted some news about the stock market!

Yes folks, and if you see CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, The Huffington Post (HuffPost), The New York Times or The Washington Post reporting news about Wall Street, or the economy in general, it’s bad news.

In this case, CNN Business’ David Goldman reports, “US stocks plummet on Coronavirus fears: March 9, 2020. Dow falls 2,100 points.”

Well, that is definitely news Mr. Goldman…, but it was news too when the stock market hit record highs like over 30 times this last year.

It’s funny how I didn’t see any mention of those economic events.

I wonder why?

CNN must be doubly excited about this news…, as their hyping of the coronavirus seems to be working and that in turn is causing negative economic news.

Please check out my previous blogs regarding the coronavirus:

You scared of the Coronavirus? From March 3, 2020

https://mrericksonrules.com/2020/03/03/you-scared-of-the-coronavirus/

and,

Death toll hits 14,000! But I’m not talking about the coronavirus. From March 9, 2020.

https://mrericksonrules.com/2020/03/09/death-toll-hits-14000-but-im-not-talking-about-the-coronavirus/

Another article out there by David Goldman today reports, “It’s a bad day to be an energy company.”

Wow…, two articles in one day! Mr. Goldman must be extra charged up by all of this bad news!

Goldman reports, ‘“The rapidly falling price of oil [due to an oil price war between Saudi Arabia and Russia] is likely to put more pressure on energy companies in the United States, which will hurt the banks with the most credit exposure to the oil industry,’ according to CFRA Research analyst Pauline Bell.”

Yes, Mr. Goldman…, again, this is definitely news.

But it was also news when President Trump pushed to open-up more areas for oil exploration and when he got all of the pipelines approved. Not to mention when we gained our independence from Middle Eastern oil, and in fact, became the world’s number one producer of oil again!

Not to mention how low the price of gas has been for over three years now.

This “good stuff” was also news that I didn’t catch you or CNN reporting about, or even bothering to mention in most cases.

Again, I wonder why?

Actually, I don’t “wonder why” at all.

I know very well why all of the liberal propaganda, fake news, shamelessly tries to manipulate the news.

It’s all in an effort to support their anti-Trump narrative.

It’s just amazing to me how many people are still falling for this fake news.

Just watch the fanfare (I’m being sarcastic) about the market bouncing back on the fake news today.

There won’t be any.

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

March 10, 2020 0

Death toll hits 14,000! But I’m not talking about the coronavirus.

The 14,000 deaths, at least, that I’m talking about is from the annual flu bug in the United States.

So where’s all of the hysteria about that?

14,000 deaths!

And 14,000 deaths is on the low end of the national estimate. That number could be as high as 36,000!

The latest number we have for coronavirus related deaths is…, 22.

Yeah…, that’s right…, just 2-2.

Additionally, according to the “Advisory Board” website, “The 2019-2020 flu season has seen the most pediatric deaths in a decade.”

“This flu season has been especially bad for children, according to the CDC. The latest CDC report shows 92 pediatric deaths had been reported as of Feb. 8, the highest number by week since the 2009-2010 flu season, in which 262 pediatric deaths had occurred by this point in the season, according to CDC.”

“ScienceAlert” website reports that, “Parents are understandably concerned. But it’s important to keep in mind that comparatively few children have tested positive for the coronavirus, and deaths in children are very rare.”

“The number of reported COVID-19 cases in children remains low: of more than 44,000 confirmed cases from China, only 416 (less than 1 percent) were aged nine years or younger. No deaths were reported in this age group.”

“The majority of children and adolescents with COVID-19 in China had mild infections and recovered within one to two weeks.”

So the regular old annual flu virus is considerably more dangerous for children that the coronavirus. In fact, it appears the coronavirus isn’t dangerous for children at all.

Have we heard the fake news media reporting this?

In fact, it appears that the coronavirus isn’t really dangerous at all, except to elderly people and people who are already experiencing some form of disease or illness.

Have we heard the fake news reporting this?

The “Advisory Board” website goes on to say “Between 26 million and 36 million people have been stricken with the flu as of Feb. 8, according to the latest CDC data.”

Again…, “Between 26 MILLION and 36 MILLION people have been stricken with the flu [in the U.S.] as of Feb. 8, according to the latest CDC data.”

And we have that many cases and we already have a vaccine for the flu!

And how many people have been diagnosed with the coronavirus?

Around 500.

That’s right…, 500.

26,000,000-36,000,000 versus 500.

Oh…, but the world is coming to an end because of the coronavirus!

The hysteria being created by the fake news media and the democrats is obviously politically motivated.

Just looking at the numbers, what else could explain their reporting regarding the suppression of the flu figures and the hype of the coronavirus numbers?

As usual, what we have here is the democrats taking advantage of a crisis…, albeit a manufactured crisis.

If the fake news media and the democrats were really concerned about our wellbeing, they would be putting the coronavirus in the proper perspective and being more outspoken about the dangers of the flu virus.

It’s as simple as that.

If you could catch the virus from watching TV or reading a paper, they wouldn’t be hyping it. I guarantee you that!

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

March 9, 2020 1

Oh, Schumer you’re so blind, you’re so blind you blow my mind! Hey Schumer, hey Schumer!

Senator UpChuck Schumer from the Peoples’ Republic of New York.

They should sell hats with “PRNY” on them!

Yeah! This sales could help support all of the criminals released back into the community without bail…, not to mention their future innocent victims.

Anyway…, I digress.

Senator Charles (Chuck) Schumer shot his mouth off the other day, while speaking out in front of the Supreme Court building.

So what is all of the fuss about?

Mr.EricksonRules is going to pull all of the pertinent information together for you and give you the proper perception of Senator Schumer’s words, as well as of the responses of others.

It all started with what democrat Senator Chuck Schumer said while speaking at an abortion rights rally outside of the Supreme Court on March 4, 2020.

Here are the exact words Schumer said:

“Now we stand here today because behind me, inside the walls of this Court, the Supreme Court is hearing arguments, as you know, for the first major abortion rights cases since Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch came to the bench.”

“From Louisiana, to Missouri, to Texas, Republican legislatures are waging war on women, all women. And they’re taking away fundamental rights. I want to tell you Gorsuch, I want to tell you Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

Well, that definitely sounds like a threat to me.

Since Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh are appointed for life and don’t have to be re-elected, how exactly will they “pay the price,” Mr. Schumer?

And what do you think they are going to be “hit” with?

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Schumer’s remarks were, “astonishing, reckless and completely irresponsible.”

President Trump tweeted, “There can be few things worse in a civilized, law abiding nation, than a United States Senator openly, and for all to see and hear, threatening the Supreme Court or its Justices. This is what Chuck Schumer just did. He must pay a severe price for this! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 5, 2020”

According to Ian Millhiser for the VOX website, Schumer’s words, “received a rare public rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts.”

“Roberts, for his part, interpreted this statement as a direct threat against Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, and it’s easy to see why. ‘Justices know that criticism comes with the territory,’ the chief justice said in his statement rebuking Schumer. ‘But threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous.’”

I think everyone should complete agree with Chief Justice Roberts words.

And excuse Mr. Millhiser, why would the Chief Justice interpret Schumer’s words any other way but as a “direct threat against Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh?”

Senator Schumer specifically called them out.

Any other interpretation is completely disingenuous and propagandistic spin.

The next day, after being reprimanded in The Senate by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer said, “I should not have used the words I used yesterday. They did not come out the way I intended to.”

Hmmm…, that’s funny, because you’ve been at this talking thing for quite a few years now…, in fact, it’s your job! I’m pretty sure you said exactly what you intended to say.

“He says that his intention was to convey that ‘there would be political consequences—political consequences, for President Trump and Senate Republicans—if the Supreme Court, with newly confirmed Justices, stripped away a woman’s right to choose.’”

Hmmm…, again that’s funny, because you didn’t say anything about “political consequences,” President Trump or Senate republicans, Mr. Schumer.

Are we to believe that you were that confused and unable to say what you really meant for some unknown reason?

Ian Millhiser also attempts to reason that, “There also isn’t any law prohibiting United States senators from making vaguely menacing statements about Supreme Court justices.”

Oh, but I think there is, Mr. Ian Millhiser…, and I wouldn’t necessarily classify his statements as “vague” either.

Why do I feel that if President Trump would have said these things you wouldn’t have classified his remarks as “vague?”

Just sayin’.

Anyway…, back to the law I think was violated here.

“Threatening government officials of the United States IS a felony under federal law. Threatening the President of the United States is a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 871, punishable by up to 5 years of imprisonment, that is investigated by the United States Secret Service. Threatening other officials is a Class C or D felony, usually carrying maximum penalties of 5 or 10 years under 18 U.S.C. § 875, 18 U.S.C. § 876 and other statutes. When a threat is made against a judge, it can also be considered obstruction of justice.”

Schumer continued with his “apology” in The Senate by saying, “Of course, I did not intend to suggest anything other than political and public opinion consequences for the Supreme Court, and it is a gross distortion to imply otherwise.”

“I’m from Brooklyn,” Schumer then explained. “We speak in strong language. I shouldn’t have used the words I did, but in no way was I making a threat. I never, never, would do such a thing. And Leader McConnell knows that. And Republicans, manufacturing outrage over these comments know that too.”

Chucky, Chucky…, where should I begin?

First of all, you “of course” are not given credit for anything.

Second of all, you yourself are the one attempting the “gross distortion here,” not anyone else.

Next you somehow are attempting to blame what you said and how you speak on being from Brooklyn?

Really?

What?!

Then you say people from Brooklyn speak in “strong language?”

Again…, what?!

People from Brooklyn speak in “strong language” compared to who?

In your estimation, Mr. Schumer, are there any people who talk in stronger language who would be excused from saying ever dumber things than you?

Just wondering.

Inquiring minds want to know.

I believe, for now, that covers UpChuck Schumer’s threatening Supreme Court comments.

Lastly I’d like to talk about various politicians and various media outlets attempting to justify Schumer’s comments based on comments President Trump has made about The Supreme Court.

OK…, so what has President Trump said?

Amanda Holpuch of The Guardian reports that, “While ‘elections have consequences’ – a reference to his [President Trump’s] two Supreme Court appointments since winning the White House, both reliable conservatives – ‘I only ask for fairness, especially when it comes to decisions made by the United States Supreme Court!’”

“At a press conference in India, [President Trump] Trump repeated his complaint.”

‘“I just don’t know how they [Justices Ginsberg and Sotomayor] cannot recuse themselves from anything having to do with Trump or Trump-related,’ he said. ‘The right thing to do is that.’”

‘“What Justice Sotomayor said … was really highly inappropriate and everybody agrees to that. Virtually everybody. I’ve seen papers on it, people cannot believe that she said it.’”

President Trump expressing his opinion and concern about certain Justices, based on prior inflammatory remarks, and their ability to judge fairly and without bias, is completely different from Senator Schumer’s threatening remarks.

These politicians and media outlets attempting to equate President Trump’s remarks to Senator Schumer’s remarks, somehow, are acting completely irresponsible and fraudulent.

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

March 6, 2020 0

Howard Stern isn’t “feeling the Bern!”

According to Tyler McCarthy of Fox News, “Howard Stern denounces Bernie Sanders as ‘Karl Marx Jr.’ and says he can’t beat Trump.”

In 2016 Howard Stern didn’t think Donald Trump could beat Hillary either, soooooo…

“Howard Stern laid into Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders during a recent episode of his show, referring to the self-proclaimed democratic socialist as ‘Karl Marx Jr.’”

“The host was discussing the coronavirus [another topic he is ill-informed and confused about] during a segment on his popular SiriusXM show ahead of Super Tuesday before some big wins in key states allowed Joe Biden to contest what had been Sanders’ runaway victory to that point. Stern noted that he was less worried about the virus and more concerned with what’s going on in politics.”

First of all, it was nice to hear Howard commenting on the topic of the day for once. It seems like all I’ve been hearing lately are reruns talking about things that happened ages ago.

‘“I’m more concerned that Karl Marx. Jr. is going to get the Democratic nomination,’ he said in a clip shared by Twitter user Barry Rubin.”

“His co-host, Robin Quivers, asked the 66-year-old if he was, in fact, referring to Sanders.”

‘“Yeah! It’s unbelievable. Listen if a Democrat wants to win against Trump, we can’t have Karl Marx Jr.,’ Stern continued. [Hmmm, that’s funny. What’s all this “we” stuff regarding the democrats? Stern always refers to himself as an independent. Of course, Sanders refers to himself as an independent as well, sooooo…] ‘Karl Marx. Jr. ain’t going to win the general election. It’s not going to happen. [Again…, he said the same thing about Donald Trump in 2016.] What they need is a good, strong moderate to be the candidate and Karl Marx Jr. backed Casto, and Karl Marx Jr., all the sh– he wants to get through. All the free Medicaid and all the free college. No one is going to pay for it. No one in Congress, Democrats or Republicans, are going to approve it and neither is the Senate, so we’re going to be sitting there…’”

“Stern went on to lambaste the candidate for his attacks on billionaires in the United States, going as far as to do an impression of Sanders.”

“‘I don’t think there should be any billionaires, we should take that away,’” Stern said while imitating Sanders. “I would have turned to him and said, ‘OK, now there’s an interesting notion…’”

“Stern continued: ‘All of America is based on… So tell me, give me your utopian vision, Karl. How much money should anyone be allowed to make? And by the way, Bernie, when I’m president, I don’t like people who have three homes. So, I’m going to take away two of your homes because you have three of them. How do you feel about that? I don’t believe he’s going to win the general election so if you’re a Democrat and you don’t like Trump, I mean… I think Trump is probably doing a dance.’”

“Stern takes the presidential race against Donald Trump seriously, having previously revealed during a ‘Good Morning America’ interview in May 2019 that he feels partially responsible for getting Trump elected in the first place.”

I seriously doubt that, Howard…, but you can indulge yourself in your little ego trip regarding your relevance and importance all you want, I guess.

‘“The way I helped Donald was I let him come on and be a personality. Whether you liked him or not, people related to him as a human being,’ Stern said, adding that he wishes he had been able to do the same for Hillary Clinton, who he said he ‘wanted to see’ win.”

Now that’s a tall order, Howard…, I mean helping people relate to Hillary as a human being.

Stern has now gone on to say that he backs creepy, sleepy Joe Biden now…, after he backed Mike Bloomberg that is.

Stern said he wants to “return to the normalcy” of the Obama years with Biden. He wants to “return to the way things were” before President Trump, under Obama and Biden.

Really, Howard?

You want millions of people to lose their newly found jobs?

You want millions of people to go back to being reliant on food stamps?

You want all of the thousands of manufacturing companies that have re-opened in America to shut down again?

You want to return to the days when we were dependent on Middle Eastern oil and gas prices near $4.00 a gallon?

You want to return to the days of America being taken advantage of regarding all of those flawed international trade deals?

You want to return to the days when American jobs were being shipped overseas faster than you could say “hope and change?”

You want to return to the days of “the swamp” and its influence and size expanding at a dizzying rate?

You want to return to the days of a dilapidated and under-funded military?

You want to return to the days when treasonous soldiers were pardoned and celebrated, while real American heroes were framed and charged with politically correct “crimes?”

You want to return to the days when The President could order billions of dollars to be loaded up on an unmarked plane, in the middle of the night, and flown over to Iran, without the media saying a word about it?

That’s what you’re longing for?

C’mon, Howard!

Quit being a tool for the democrat establishment!

Grab that shaggy hair of yours with both hands and pull your head out of you’re a$$!

Howard went on to suggest he could give Quid Pro Quo Joe some advice and tips on what he should say going forward and how he should handle President Trump during the debates.

Stern’s suggestions for sleepy Joe were actually quite comical…, as if Biden would be able to control President Trump during a debate!

Consider President Trump and this opening statement in their first debate, Howard:

“I’m sure you’re aware, Joe, of what you and your democrat friends tried, and failed, to impeach me for.”

“They tried to imply that I threatened the Ukrainian president, which I didn’t, with a withholding of funds, which we didn’t, if he failed to investigate your possible corruption prior to the 2016 election, which he didn’t do.”

“It’s pretty hard to have a “quid pro quo” arrangement, Joe, when there is no “quid” and there is no “quo.”

“You, Joe, on the other hand, are on tape, however, bragging about doing EXACTLY what you and your friends accused me of doing.”

“You said, and I’ll read your EXACT quote. You said, ‘I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. He got fired.’”

“Now THAT, Joe, is a textbook example of the president of The Ukraine being threatened with a “quid pro quo.”

“What you actually DID is what you and your friends, and the fake news media, tried to hang on me.”

“You not only admitted it in your own words, but you bragged about it! And all of your friends there in the fake news media laughed about it!”

“None of your democrat friends or the fake news media seemed to have any problems with what you DID, but they spent over 6 months fighting to breathe life into the hoax that I did what you actually did.”

“And you and your democrat friends will not admit that the fake news, mainstream media, is an arm of the democrat party used for liberal propaganda, when it is quite obvious they are.”

“In my opinion, we can bypass any investigation involving you and Ukraine and proceed right to the sentencing phase. You obviously broke multiple laws and you publicly confessed to breaking those laws.”

“Secondly, we have the events surrounding your son, Hunter, Joe.”

“Here we have a young man who flies into China with you on Air Force Two, and somehow flies home with millions of dollars in his investment fund. Then he ends up being put on the board of a Ukrainian gas company and gets paid over $50 thousand a month. Both of these countries being places where you have quite a bit of influence, being The Vice President of The United States. But you claim to have no knowledge of any of his activities.”

“I’m not even going to argue the legality or the appropriateness of any of that right now, Joe.”

“But I am going to ask the American people to please stop and consider what I’m about to say.”

“Suppose my sons, Eric or Don Jr., or my daughters, Ivanka or Tiffany, were involved in some sweetheart deals like your son, Hunter?”

“What do you think your democrat friends or the fake news media would have to say about that?”

“I think they all would have all lost their minds and would have launched endless investigations into my children and I.”

“Seriously, it would have been an absolute circus.”

“Can anybody even argue that assumption?”

“Now I ask the American people, why does the fake news media choose to look the other way in Hunter Biden’s, your son’s case, Joe, but you know darn well they would absolutely crucify my children and I?”

“It’s not just a bias, Joe…, it’s a concerted effort to misinform and manipulate the American people.”

“It’s like I said before, you and your democrat friends will not admit that the fake news, mainstream media, is an arm of the democrat party used for liberal propaganda, when it is quite obvious they are.”

“I am appealing to the American people to recognize what has been going on here with the fake news media. Hold them accountable, and demand that they report the news fairly and honestly on your behalf and in your interests…, not the best interest of just one party…, the democrat party.”

How do you like that, Howard?

I think that’s much better than the weak sauce you came up with for Creepy Joe.

That is how President Trump destroys Joe Biden, the democrat party, and the liberal propaganda, fake news media within 5 minutes of their first debate.

You have been thoroughly destroyed during this blog as well, Howard…, how does it feel?

Maybe you could help Sleepy Joe prepare for his annihilation?

Hey…, the democrats are the ones who decided to open up this can of worms…, and these worms ain’t going back in the can!

Remember, Howard Stern, and your democrat friends…, be careful what you wish for, because you just might get it.

WINNING!

P.S. – Hey Howard…, you’re looking a little long in the tooth these days. It won’t be long until you have that Don Imus and Larry King vibe going on! Just sayin’.

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

March 6, 2020 0

There’s this club…, and you ain’t in it!

As time goes by, and we see how we seem to have a two-tiered justice system…, it’s very apparent that there is a big, privileged club, out there and we ain’t in it!

Yes folks…, a big, privileged club that does not have to obey the laws like we do, or at least be free of any accountability to the American people.

So who’s in “the club?”

Well, we’ve got Hillary, followed by James Comey, the “lovers” Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, James Clapper, William Brennam, Andrew McCabe, Rod Rosenstein, Bruce Ohr, Loretta Lynch, Susan Rice, Eric Holder, Lois Lerner, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, John Kerry, all of the FISA Court Judges, all of the liberal New York And D.C. District Judges, and our lying “Russian collusion” and impeachment happy members of congress…, just for starters!

Hopefully Attorney General Barr and Investigator John Durham charge some of these club members with something before we all die of old age!

I can’t say we’re WINNING with “the club” just yet…, but the fat lady hasn’t sung yet either.

I’m still holding out hope that at least SOME level of justice will prevail.

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

March 5, 2020 0

WE MUST STOP BERNIE NOW! (Said the old establishment democrats.)

Why would Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar end their presidential campaigns ONE DAY BEFORE Super Tuesday?

Why would Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar end their presidential campaigns one day before over a third of all democrat delegates were up for grabs?

Why would Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar end their presidential campaigns after a year of campaigning…, after a year of spending millions of dollars…, after a year of giving endless speeches…, one day before over a third of all democrat primary delegates are decided?

And why would they suddenly endorse Sleepy Joe Biden?

Someone must have made it extremely worth their while.

The question is…, who would stand to benefit the most from them dropping out one day before the primaries on Super Tuesday?

Who needs to make a good, or better, showing on Super Tuesday…, Biden, Bernie or Bloomberg?

I believe the answer to that question would be “creepy and confused” Joe Biden.

Now…, who was in a position to make their drop-outs happen?

I don’t believe Bernie needs their help in the first place, so I’m ruling him out.

Bloomberg can afford to do anything he wants, and he probably stands to pick-up the most votes in this scenario as well.

The democrat establishment behind Biden wields a lot of money power and a lot of political positional power.

In the final analysis, it’s my belief that it was the anti-Bernie establishment democrats who were responsible for Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar bowing out the day before Super Tuesday.

“Creepy and confused” Joe Biden and Mini-Mike Bloomberg will both benefit because of this, although Mayor Pete and Amy Klobuchar specifically endorsed Joe Biden, which tipped the hands of the establishment democrats.

The establishment democrats, however, are in the unenviable position of trying to rally behind “gaffemaster” Joe.

No sooner had Sleepy Joe received the hurried endorsements of Mayor Pete, Amy Klobuchar and Beto O’Rourke, during his campaign rally speech in Houston, TX Monday, Creepy Joe ended up declaring his stupidity rather recalling the Declaration of Independence.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident…, all men and women created by the, you know…, you know, the thing,” he said.

Then, in the same speech, Creepy Joe referred to Super Tuesday as Super Thursday!

“Look, tomorrow’s Super Thurs…, Tuesday,” he said, as members of the audience laughed and shook their heads. “I’ll tell you what, I’m rushing ahead, aren’t I?” he then said.

No, Creepy and confused” Joe…, you’re just a hot mess, and all of those people can’t believe who they’re left to vote for!

Of course, the liberal propaganda, fake news media co-conspirators, has chosen to spin Biden’s gaffes into something less concerning.

Dana Milbank of The Washington Post says, “Joe Biden isn’t just a gaffe machine. He’s the Lamborghini of gaffes.”

He continues by saying, “Some say it’s unfair to draw attention to Biden when President Trump is the most mendacious [that’s “lying” to all of us uneducated deplorables] politician ever. I disagree: Biden’s gaffes are to be celebrated, for they make him exciting. When he opens his mouth, nobody knows what is going to come out — least of all Biden.”

Did you get that?

“Biden’s gaffes are to be celebrated.”

And “President Trump is the most [lying] politician ever.”

It’s funny how that works, isn’t it?

Mr. Milbank was also very sure Donald Trump would not become President back in 2016.

How did eating that article taste, anyway?

Ha!

I’m sure he never ate it, just like the other windbags never left the country.

The democrats can spin it any way they want, but the bottom line remains…, their choices come down to a commie, a confused creeper and a pompous pretender.

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

March 4, 2020 1

I can see in my crystal ball…, yes…, it’s becoming clearer…, I see improved cooperation between sanctuary cities and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)!

But why the sudden change of heart by all of these sanctuary liberal strongholds?

Well, according to Jonathan Stempel of Reuters News Service, “President Donald Trump’s administration can withhold millions of dollars in law enforcement funds from states and cities that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Wednesday.”

Ohhh, that’s why!

Now we’ll see how much federal money these liberal sanctuary cities are willing to do without.

I believe we’ll see a shining example here of how “money talks and BS walks!”

“The unanimous decision by a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan was a victory for [President] Trump in his years-long fight with so-called sanctuary jurisdictions.”

“It overturned a lower court ruling directing the release of federal funds to New York City and the states of New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Virginia and Washington.”

“The states and cities sued over a 2017 policy conditioning receipt of the funds by state and local governments on their giving federal immigration officials access to their jails, and advance notice when immigrants in the country illegally are being released from custody.”

Just to let you know, if you’re not already aware, the democrats in this country have been influencing behavior, by cities and the states, with the promise of or the withholding of federal money for decades.

It is almost comical that they chose to sue the federal government over doing the same thing they themselves have used to their benefit without question.

“Wednesday’s decision sets up a possible appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which often resolves legal disputes that divide lower courts.”

Ha! Good luck with that appeal!

“A U.S. Justice Department spokesman called the decision a ‘major victory for Americans’ in recognizing Attorney General William Barr’s authority to ensure that grant recipients do not thwart federal law enforcement priorities.”

It is a major WIN for American across the country.

Are you tired of winning yet?

I know I’m not!

“His [President Trump’s] battle against Democratic-led ‘sanctuary’ jurisdictions focuses on laws and policies making it harder for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials to find and arrest immigrants they consider deportable.”

“U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos in Manhattan in Nov. 2018 declared the conditions unconstitutional, saying the administration acted arbitrarily and capriciously in withholding grants without considering the impact on local law enforcement.”

“Acted arbitrarily and capriciously?” Oh, you mean like when local police let dangerous criminal back out into their communities with no concern about the safety of their citizens, Judge Ramos?

“[The DOJ], however, said the conditions ‘help the federal government enforce national immigration laws and policies supported by successive Democratic and Republican administrations.’”

Like I said earlier, the democrats in this country have been influencing behavior, by cities and the states, with the promise of or the withholding of federal money for decades and decades.

Karma’s a b…h, ain’t it!

And, “what goes around comes around!”

WINNING!