As usual, the democrats just don’t get it, or they refuse to acknowledge reality.

adems 7

As reported in the annual Annenberg survey, only 32% of Americans can name our three branches of government and 33% can’t name any of the branches of our government!

adems 1

With that in mind, I realize I’m going a little out on a limb here discussing British politics…, but I believe MrEricksonRules’ readers are well informed and interested in how the recent British elections may relate to the upcoming U.S. election in 2020.

According to Adam Shaw, Paul Steinhauser and Kelly Phares of Fox News, “Left-wing Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn saw his party mauled in Britain’s general election Thursday as its strongholds across the country fell to Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Conservative Party — a dramatic result that commentators on both sides of the pond are seeing as a warning to socialist-leaning Democrats ahead of the U.S. presidential election.”

adems 9

“And for those who have openly cautioned about the party’s drift to the left, the U.K. results were treated as nothing short of a wake-up call. A sign, for some, that even a populist incumbent as irreverent and contentious as Johnson could ride to victory when the alternative is an equally controversial leftist vowing massive government expansion.”

Or perhaps an irreverent populist is just what the British people are looking for!

The liberals would never admit that, however.  This was obviously just some sort of mistake or a strategical miscalculation.

‘“Maybe this is the canary in the coal mine,’ Democratic presidential hopeful Michael Bloomberg, who has tried to sell himself as a more electable alternative to candidates like Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders since entering the race last month, told reporters Friday.”

adems 6

And therein lies the problem with the democrats…, they’re always trying to “sell themselves” as something they’re not rather than just being honest about what they stand for.

Anyway…, nice analogy Mr. Bloomberg!

Only you think the canary dying symbolizes some sort of a warning for liberals, while I think it is symbolizing the death of the Democrat Party!

‘“The public clearly wanted a change in the U.K. The change was much more rapid and [had] greater magnitude than anyone had predicted. And I think it’s sort of a catastrophic warning to the Democratic Party that you’re just going to have to have somebody that can beat Donald Trump, and that is not going to be easy.”

adems 2

The problem here is, “Bloomy,” otherwise known as “Mr. Excitement…,” the majority of the people have to want a change for some reason, and President Trump hasn’t given them one. In fact, he has acquired supporters who feel he has, and is, doing a good job.

President Trump has proven he’s not your typical politician.

He has kept all of his campaign promises, and has accumulated quite a list of accomplishments along the way regarding the economy, energy, VA policies, positive minority policies, trade imbalances and foreign policy, just to name a few.

“Americans want change, but I think they don’t want revolutionary change,” the centrist billionaire said. “They want evolutionary change.”

What does that mean?

Please…, don’t even pretend to know what most Americans want, “Bloomy.”

adems 3

“[Boris] Johnson’s Tories won 365 seats in Parliament’s lower chamber, with Labour picking up just 203. It hands the Conservatives their biggest majority since the days of Margaret Thatcher and marks the worst showing for Labour since the 1930s. The left-wing party was left shell-shocked after a night that saw once-safe seats in working-class areas turn Tory, with enormous swings that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago.”

Ha!  Ya…, we know what “shell-shocked liberals look like!

adems 10

“Seats in places such as Bolsover, Workington, Blyth Valley, Burnley, Wrexham and Stoke-on-Trent toppled one after another, each one yet another nail in the coffin of Labour’s hopes of ushering in a socialist government and preventing Britain’s departure from the European Union. It represented what many commentators are seeing as a realignment in British politics, as the Conservatives ripped up the electoral map and made gains in the North East, the North West and Wales in particular.”

This is comparable to President Trump winning the “rust belt” manufacturing states, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin in the 2016 presidential election.

adems 11

“Corbyn announced that he would eventually step down, promising not to lead the party in another general election, but saying that would come after a ‘period of reflection.’ He quickly tried to set the narrative that it was questions over Brexit, not his brand of hard-left policies that had ‘ultimately doomed the party.’”

Like I said…, these liberals just don’t get it.

There won’t be any “period of reflection…,” only a period of “restrategization.”

‘“All those policies were extremely popular during the election campaign and remain policies that have huge popular support all across this country,’ he said. ‘However Brexit has so polarized and divided debate in this country it has overriden so much of a normal political debate and I recognize that has contributed to the results the Labour Party has received all across this country.’”

Please stop trying to kid yourself and the British people.  I mean, we can all see exactly how “extremely popular” your policies were across your country.

Wa, wa, wa, waaaaaa.

“But while many of the seats that fell represent ‘pro-Leave’ [pro-Brexit] areas, polls suggested that it was Corbyn — and his extreme brand of left-wing politics — that was a more significant factor for Brits. Corbyn had taken over the party leadership in 2015 and dragged it to the left in a rejection of the kind of centrism embodied by three-term Prime Minister Tony Blair.”

Like I said…, these liberals just don’t get it, and they are refusing to allow the will of the people to affect their narrative.

“It’s a lesson that many in the U.K. and the U.S. are saying should be a warning for Democrats who may think that victory lies with an uncompromising agenda featuring government health care, immigration enforcement rollbacks and more. Democrats like Sens. Sanders, I-Vt., and Warren, D-Mass., have promoted far-reaching policies such as ‘Medicare-for-all’ and a halt to deportations of illegal immigrants — leading some to fear they may be out of step with the country.”

They’re only “out of step” with those of us who want to see America succeed.

They’re only “out of step” with those of us who work, or have worked, for a living.

And they’re only “out of step” with those of us who are informed and use our common sense.

adems 12

‘“One lesson from the UK: if the Democrats don’t stop their hard-left slide, they’ll suffer the same fate as Labour,’ commentator Andrew Sullivan tweeted. ‘If they don’t move off their support for mass immigration, they’re toast. Ditto the “wokeness.” Left [leaning] Twitter is not reality.’”

No worries there!

Toast it is!

“Former Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan warned also about the Twitter bubble, and that Democrats should be careful about picking someone too far on the fringes.”

‘“Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren both share Jeremy Corbyn’s socialist agenda and both appear to be as popular as him on Twitter,’ Morgan said in an op-ed. ‘But Twitter’s not the real world.’”

“He also drew comparisons between the British Left’s effort to thwart Brexit and the Democratic push to impeach Trump, rather than beat him at the ballot box.”

‘“Those who voted for Brexit and Trump don’t take kindly to their democratic vote being abused in this way and their retribution comes at the ballot box,’ he said. ‘If people think Boris Johnson’s earthquake was big, just wait until the Senate acquits President Trump and he uses that victory to storm to re-election.’”

Amen!

adems 10

“But if there is that kind of warning for Americans, it may be a message that meets significant resistance from activists hoping for their own version of a Corbynite revolution, and who may not be put off by the warning signs in Thursday’s vote.”

In other words…, the anti-American liberals, “the swamp,” RINOs (Mitt Romney for example), and the generally clueless.

adems 5

“MSNBC host Chris Hayes pointed out that Corbyn is running in a way that many Democrats would like to see.”

Again…, like I said…, these liberals just don’t get it, and they are refusing to allow the will of the people to affect their narrative.

‘“One thing you can’t say about the Corbyn campaign was that he was “Tory lite” [conservative lite] or too neoliberal or too establishment. He ran unabashedly from the left in a way many leftists want Democrats to run here in the U.S.,’ he tweeted. But after some criticism he deleted it, saying it was a ‘bad take.’”

And that was his problem!

Here we had a liberal that didn’t pretend to be something he wasn’t.

And that’s exactly why he and his party got whooped so bad!

“But the message of the U.K. election had also resonated in the White House. On Friday, [President] Trump suggested that just as the 2016 Brexit referendum foreshadowed his own presidential win a few months later, the 2019 U.K. election forecasts a win for him in 2020.”

‘“I want to congratulate Boris Johnson on a terrific victory. I think that might be a harbinger of what’s to come in our country,’ he said. ‘It was last time.’”

It might very well be a “harbinger of what’s to come in our country,” Mr. President.

adems 13

And if that were the case, that would mean a landslide victory you.

But what would a “landslide” victory look like for you?

First of all, a landslide victory for you would include your personal victory as well as maintaining control of the senate and regaining control of the House of Representatives.

Second, we would see you capturing a considerable majority of electoral votes.

What do I mean by a “considerable majority of electoral votes?”

Well, there are 538 total electoral votes that can be won.

The winner is the first candidate to win 270 of those votes.

The democrat in the race is virtually guaranteed to win 151 votes because of the liberal dominance in states like California, New York, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, Massachusetts, Maryland, Rhode Island, and the District of Columbia.

That means a landslide victory for President Trump would be in the range of 340-350 electoral votes.  He won 304 electoral votes in 2016.

Lastly, President Trump would come very close to, if not winning the popular vote outright.

It is my belief that President Trump WILL win re-election in a “landslide” victory in 2020.

WINNING!

adems 14

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Is the recent election in the UK a sign of things to come for the 2020 US election?

I believe the answer to that would be a resounding YES!

The democrat/liberal leadership in America realizes this as well.

The democrat/liberal leadership in America may be evil, but they’re not stupid.  That’s why they’re in a perpetual impeachment mode.  It’s their only option to stop President Trump and conservatism at this point…, even if they’re failing miserably at the attempt.

aelectuk 2

According to Adam Shaw of FOX News, “U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Conservative Party was swept back into government Friday after an historic election night that saw opposition Labour Party strongholds across the country swing dramatically to the Tories — making Britain’s departure from the European Union a near-certainty, and immediately bringing a promise of a new trade deal from President Trump.

Note: “The Labour Party” in the UK is the equivalent to the Democrat Party in the US, and the “Tories” in the UK would equate to the Republicans in the US.

‘“Congratulations to Boris Johnson on his great WIN! Britain and the United States will now be free to strike a massive new Trade Deal after BREXIT,’ [President] Trump tweeted. ‘This deal has the potential to be far bigger and more lucrative than any deal that could be made with the E.U. Celebrate Boris!’”

“The Tories won 364 seats in the country’s 650-seat lower chamber, while Labour picked up just 203 — which would give the Tories a majority of 78. It marked a significant victory for the Tories, and a historic drubbing for the Labour Party of a kind they haven’t seen since 1930.

“A HISTORIC DRUBBING FOR THE LABOUR PARTY OF A KIND THEY HAVEN’T SEEN SINCE 1930!

1930!

That’s in the last 89 years!

That’s a loooong time and a lot of elections.

This is truly a “historic” and a very significant “drubbing.”

Of course, The Labour Party is calling the election victory “utterly devastating for the UK.”

A note to The Labour Party…, the people of the UK electing who they want to represent them in their country’s government is not “devastating” for the country.

It’s definitely devastating for The Labour Party, but not the UK.

Fair and free elections are the heart of a democracy.

One of the problems they, and we, have is that many of our elected officials need to be reminded they work for us and not the other way around.

The Labour Party in the UK, just like the Democrats in the US, tend to confuse what is best for their countries versus their warped and corrupt political goals.

The liberal media in the UK, much like the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” in the US, failed to report that this was coming, and will, of course, downplay this historic event and/or spin it to fit their liberal narrative.

In other words, they’re going to choose to “double down” on their lies and misinformation for the sake of their political and social desires…, again.

The only problem with their plan is that this strategy obviously is not working, as the British electorate jus historically demonstrated.

“The night saw traditional Labour areas such as Burnley, Redcar, Stoke-on-Trent and Wrexham — with some seats that have been held by the party for decades — fall like dominos to the Conservatives. Many of those seats, often in working class areas, had voted in favor of Britain’s departure from the European Union in 2016, and had soured at the Labour Party’s anti-Brexit stance.”

The British people voted for Brexit in 2016, but The Labour Party felt it knew better than the people and fought to block Britain’s exit the last three years.

Well…, I guess the British people didn’t like being told what was best for them and responded in this election in an historic and overwhelming fashion.

I have a feeling the American people will have a similar message for the Democrats in 2020, regarding their unprecedented and continuous attacks on our duly elected president, President Donald Trump.

“As the results came in, Johnson declared that his party had been given ‘a powerful new mandate.’ In the morning, he promised to secure Brexit, as well as his agenda on everything from the health service to the economy to immigration.”

‘“And I repeat that in winning this election we have won votes and the trust of people who have never voted Conservative before and people have always voted for other parties. Those people want change. We cannot, must not, must not, let them down,’ he said.”

“[Jeremy] Corbyn, who had been on the fringe of the [Labour] party for decades, won the leadership in 2015 and had rejected the more centrist shift the party had taken under former Prime Ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.”

Hmmmm.  Does that scenario sound familiar?

“The election will result in a Conservative Party dominance in the U.K. not seen since the days of former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher — who won 397 seats in the 1983 general election.”

Vandana Rambaran of Fox News reports that, “In the U.S., liberal lawmakers had urged U.K. residents to vote against Johnson, who is a friend and ally to President Trump.”

aelectuk 1

That “urging” sure seemed to have a positive effect!

“Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., posted an anti-Johnson video on Twitter insisting that conservative economic policies are hurting Britain’s working class.”

aelectuk6

Believe me when I say that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez hasn’t the foggiest notion of what the “working class” is, much less what would hurt them.

‘“This video is about the UK, but it might as well have been produced in the United States,’ Ocasio-Cortez wrote, touting her support for Corbyn, who has been accused of being an anti-Semite.”

A clueless liberal and an anti-Semite?  No wonder he has AOC’s support!

‘“The hoarding of wealth by the few is coming at the cost of peoples’ lives,’ she [AOC] said. ‘The only way we change is with a massive surge of *new* voters at the polls. UK, Vote!’”

“Costing peoples’ lives?”

Oh, you’re so dramatic Alexandria!

aelectuk 3

I would like to make one small correction, however, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez.  You don’t just need a “surge of new voters” to help the liberal cause…, you need a surge of new misinformed and properly indoctrinated liberal voters.

aelectuk 7

aelectuk 8

aelectuk 5

“Jess Phillips, a Labour Party candidate for Birmingham Yardley, expressed her devastation at her party’s defeat.”

‘“It feels like a punch in the stomach, she said.”

aelectuk 4

Awwwww, that’s too bad.

Would you like a kick in the a$$ to go along with that punch in the stomach?!

WINNING!

aelectuk 10

aelectuk 9

 

I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!

If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

This is how President Trump could destroy Joe Biden in a debate in about 5 minutes.

The democrats and the fake news media are accusing President Trump of a “quid pro quo” arrangement with the Ukrainian president, and attempting to impeach him for it.

In case you’re not familiar with it, “quid pro quo” is a Latin term…, “quid” meaning “money,” “pro” meaning “for, and “quo” meaning “something received.”

Let’s fast forward to a potential presidential debate during the fall of 2020.

adebate 3

President Trump is giving his opening statement:

“I’m sure you’re aware, Joe, of what you and your democrat friends tried, and failed, to impeach me for.”

“They tried to imply that I threatened the Ukrainian president, which I didn’t, with a withholding of funds, which we didn’t, if he failed to investigate your possible corruption prior to the 2016 election, which he didn’t do.”

“It’s pretty hard to have a “quid pro quo” arrangement, Joe, when there is no “quid” and there is no “quo.”

“You, Joe, are on tape, however, bragging about doing EXACTLY what you and your friends accused me of doing.”

adebate 5

“You said, and I’ll read your EXACT quote.  You said, ‘I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. He got fired.’”

“Now THAT, Joe, is a textbook example of the president of The Ukraine being threatened with a “quid pro quo.”

“What you actually DID is what you and your friends, and the fake news media, tried to hang on me.”

adebate 2

“You not only admitted it in your own words, but you bragged about it!  And all of your friends there in the fake news media laughed about it!”

“None of your democrat friends or the fake news media seemed to have any problems with what you DID, but they spent the last 6 months fighting to breathe life into the hoax that I did what you actually did.”

“And you and your democrat friends will not admit that the fake news, mainstream media, is an arm of the democrat party used for liberal propaganda, when it is quite obvious they are.”

“In my opinion, we can bypass any investigation involving you and Ukraine and proceed right to the sentencing phase.  You obviously broke multiple laws and you publicly confessed to breaking those laws.”

“Secondly, we have the events surrounding your son, Hunter, Joe.”

adebate 4

“Here we have a young man who flies into China with you on Air Force Two, and somehow flies home with millions of dollars in his investment fund.  Then he ends up being put on the board of a Ukrainian gas company and gets paid over $50 thousand a month.  Both of these countries being places where you have quite a bit of influence, being The Vice President of The United States.  But you claim to have no knowledge of any of his activities.”

adebate 8

“I’m not even going to argue the legality or the appropriateness of any of that right now, Joe.”

“But I am going to ask the American people to please stop and consider what I’m about to say.”

“Suppose my sons, Eric or Don Jr., or my daughters, Ivanka or Tiffany, were involved in some sweetheart deals like your son, Hunter?”

adebate 6

“What do you think your democrat friends or the fake news media would have to say about that?”

“I think they all would have lost their minds and would have launched endless investigations into my children and I.”

“Seriously, it would have been an absolute circus.”

“Can anybody even argue that assumption?”

adebate 7

“Now I ask the American people, why does the fake news media choose to look the other way in Hunter Biden’s, your son’s case, Joe, but you know darn well they would absolutely crucify my children and I?”

“It’s not just a bias, Joe…, it’s a concerted effort to misinform and manipulate the American people.”

adebate 9

“It’s like I said before, you and your democrat friends will not admit that the fake news, mainstream media, is an arm of the democrat party used for liberal propaganda, when it is quite obvious they are.”

“I am appealing to the American people to recognize what has been going on here with the fake news media.  Hold them accountable, and demand that they report the news fairly and honestly on your behalf and in your interests…, not the best interest of just one party…, the democrat party.”

And that is how President Trump destroys Joe Biden, the democrat party, and the liberal propaganda, fake news media within 5 minutes of their first debate.

And you don’t have to take my word for what Vice President Biden said at the time…, you can watch the actual video of Biden bragging about his “quid pro quo” below.  Put your cursor on the link, press the “Ctrl” key and click with your mouse.

https://youtu.be/Q0_AqpdwqK4

Hey…, the democrats are the ones who decided to open up this can of worms…, and these worms ain’t going back in the can!

Remember democrats, be careful what you wish for, because you just might get it.

WINNING!

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Here we go again with claims of “phantom” future evidence against The President!

ed 1

For over two years we heard from the democrats about how Robert “the clueless tool” Mueller was going to destroy President Trump.

They spent 30-40 million dollars, issued over 2,500 subpoenas, and came up with NOTHING!

NOTHING!

ed 5

ed 4

ed 6

We heard daily from the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” about all of this other evidence that was going to surface, which never did.  NOTHING!

NOTHING!

ed 7

ed 8

We heard regularly from “shifty” Adam Schiff, and how he had all of this evidence showing criminal activity against The President, which never managed to make an appearance.  NOTHING!

NOTHING!

ed 10

ed 2

Now we have another baseless, bogus investigation of The President and his call with the Ukrainian president, and we have another liberal liar, making libelous claims about supposed criminal activity, and referring to “evidence,” which in reality is nothing but wishful thinking.

According to Joshua Nelson of Fox News, “President Trump ‘committed a crime by soliciting the Ukraine government to get involved in the U.S. election,’ the former DNC Chairman and Pennsylvania Governor, ‘Mister Ed’ Rendell told ‘America’s Newsroom.’”

ed 3

Your level of confusion is impressive “Mister Ed!”

President Trump was referring to events that occurred prior to the 2016 election, not about events leading up to the 2020 election.

‘“I think we got to watch what rolls out in the next month or so. I think there’s more evidence to come and I think as the evidence rolls out, it’s going to become more and more clear that the president not only broke the law here but he abused his power at the detriment of the United States of America,’ Rendell said.”

Yes, “Mister Ed,” you do have to “watch what rolls out in the next month or so,” because that’s all you have to pin your hopes on!

NOTHING has managed to “roll out” so far!

NOTHING!

“I think as the evidence rolls out, it’s going to become more and more clear that the president not only broke the law here but he abused his power.”

WHERE, AND HOW MANY TIMES, HAVE WE HEARD THAT LINE BEFORE!!!

I swear…, the democrats must really think we’re all idiots.

They sure are sticking with the fascists’ playbook, however.

“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.” – Adolf Hitler

And…,

“Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty.” – Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Nazi Propaganda Minister

This is when the democrats typically roll out Ed Rendell…, when they want some “tool” or “party flunky” to regurgitate the latest liberal narrative, and keep “the lie” alive.

‘“There is not a trace of evidence that the Bidens did anything wrong and in my judgment — and I was district attorney for eight years — the president committed a crime,’ he [Rendell] said.”

OHHHH, NOOOO!

Joe Biden didn’t do anything wrong, except come out and say he did EXACTLY what the democrats are accusing President Trump of doing…, which he didn’t do!

Unbelievable.

“Your judgement,” Mr. Rendell, is about as valuable as a ticket to that failed Bill and Hillary Clinton show, which they ended up giving tickets away to, and then actually paid people to go in order to save some face.

ed12

Nothing at all like a Trump rally, hey Hill?

ed 13

On a related note…, “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., called [‘Shifty’ Adam] Schiff a ‘patriot.’”

The first question that comes to mind is a “patriot” for what country?  The People’s Republic of California?  Certainly not The United States of America.

ed 11

“The intelligence committee chairman [‘Shifty’ Adam Schiff] has admitted he should have been clearer about his contact with the ‘whistleblower’ who filed a complaint about Trump’s July phone call with the Ukrainian president.”

Which really means he should have been more careful so as not to have been caught!

“Schiff [then] recited what he later called a ‘parody’ reading of ‘the call’ at a House hearing, drawing harsh criticism from Republicans.”

ed 9

This “parody,” as he now calls his comments before a congressional hearing, were never prefaced as such.  We were led to believe Schiff was quoting what the President had said on the call.  That was until The President released an actual transcript of the call, forcing “Shifty” Adam Schiff to eat his words.

Words must not have many calories…, because Congressman Schiff has been eating a lot of his words lately…, and yet he is still so skinny!

WINNING!

ed 15

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

What a motley crew (or “Libs Gone Wild!”): The 2020 Democrat presidential candidates!

Seriously?

This is the best group of candidates the democrats could come up with?

demcans 13

None of the current candidates conjure up any vision of them being “presidential,” with possible exception of Joe Biden.

I Predicted Hillary would run again in my blog, “I’m letting everyone know, again, that Hillary is going to run for President, again, in 2020.” from March 15, 2018, and that prediction is looking good, at least as a vice presidential candidate.

Anyway…, let’s take a look at the current crop of esteemed democrat presidential candidates, along with my official candidate classifications!

“On Life Support:” Kamala Harris and Corey Booker.  They seem to get quite a bit of media coverage, although they have been polling at 5% or less.  I believe the fact that they’re Black keeps them from falling into the next category.

“The Walking Dead:” Andrew Yang, Amy Klobuchar, Tulsi Gabbard, Julian Castro and Beto O’Rourke.  This group consistently polls less than 5%.  Beto and Julian are typically at 1% or less, yet I feel like Beto gets quite a bit of airtime.  Why would anyone care about what he says one way of the other?  Just sayin’.

Then we come to “The Cream of the Crappy Crop:” Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg.  These four typically poll with at least 13%, with Biden and Warren usually over 20%.

If Hillary doesn’t jump back into the race, or somebody else doesn’t jump into the race, one of these four will be the democrat presidential candidate for the 2020 presidential election.

Bwahahahahahahaha!

I’m sorry…, let’s get back to looking at the top 4 democrat presidential candidates.

Drumroll please…:

Number four…, Mayor Pete Buttigieg.  Of the top four, Mayor Pete is probably the most reasonable, policy-wise.  But is a small town mayor really ready to run our country?  Are we really ready for our “first lady” to be a man?  I don’t think so.

demcans 12

demcans 9

demcans 10

demcans 11

Number three…, Senator Bernie Sanders.  “Crazy” Bernie identifies as an “Independent” in The Senate, but he’s running for president as a democrat.  We knew he was a democrat all along.  Why was he misrepresenting himself the whole time?  He was obviously being disingenuous.  He seems like he’s a thousand years old, and he is not afraid to admit he’s a socialist at heart.  Your time has passed Bern.

demcans 2

Number two (or 1B)…, Senator Elizabeth Warren. When I see her, she reminds me of a “bag lady” who is wearing her best clothes and left her cart(s) outside. Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren is carrying around a lot of racial baggage, along with a lot of cultural hijacking for reasons of personal gain.  She is a woman, but will that be enough for women to hold their noses and actually vote for her?  In the end, they may not have any other choice.  She may be the democrat candidate by default.

demcans 3

demcans 4

demcans 14

Then we have number one (or 1A)…, former Senator and former Vice President Joe Biden…, another poster child for term limits and an “establishment” tool. “Sleepy, creepy, Uncle” Joe Biden is another guy who’s time has really passed.  His only claim to fame is that he was Barack Obama’s vice president, but former President Obama won’t even endorse him!  Plus Vice President Biden actually DID the things the democrats are trying to impeach President Trump for.  He may also end-up being the democrat candidate by default.

demcans 7

demcans 6

demcans 8

Whoever is left standing, you can be sure they’ll have the complete and undivided support of the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media,” along with George Soros and all of the other wealthy “America haters.”

FOUR MORE YEARS!  FOUR MORE YEARS!

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Hey Kemosabe…, “jump on it, jump on it!” Elizabeth Warren is a fraudulent Native American!

Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren has now become the democrats’ presidential front runner it would appear.

fraud 6

To celebrate her new standing in the polls, I think she deserves a little attention from MrEricksonRules!

First…, let’s quickly review Elizabeth Warren’s fraudulent Native American racial claims.

In April 1986, Warren listed herself as “Native American” on a Texas state bar registration form.

fraud 4

Warren also identified herself as “Native American” at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where she worked from 1987 to 1995.

fraud 7

Harvard Law School, where Warren taught before entering politics, referred to Warren as “the school’s only Native American professor” as recently as 1996.  Harvard then identified Warren as “Native American” on federal affirmative action forms every year until 2004.

fraud 5

I wonder if Harvard managed to avoid any tax penalties based on Warren’s designation?

Warren also listed herself as a minority in the Association of American Law Schools directory from 1986 to 1994.

Could you even imagine the outrage by “the media” if a similar discovery were made about President Trump?

There would be non-stop protests, a special prosecutor, Congressional hearings, more talk of impeachment, yada, yada, yada.

Am I wrong?

As it stands, the “mainstream media” has basically given Warren a pass on this, as have most of the other democrats.

fraud 8

Google, of course, is doing its part as well.

When we “Google” “Elizabeth Warren’s Native American claims” we get these top 10 results:

 

“Elizabeth Warren Apologizes at Native American Forum: ‘I …”

https://www.nytimes.com › 2019/08/19 › us › politics › elizabeth-warren-nat…

 

“Inside Elizabeth Warren’s courtship of Native American leaders”

https://www.cnn.com › 2019/08/18 › politics › elizabeth-warren-native-amer…

 

“Elizabeth Warren confronts handling of Native American … – Vox”

https://www.vox.com › policy-and-politics › elizabeth-warren-native-ameri…

 

“Warren Apologizes at Native American Forum – The Wall …”

https://www.wsj.com › Politics › Election 2020

 

“Elizabeth Warren apologizes over Native American heritage …”

https://www.latimes.com › politics › story › elizabeth-warren-native-americ…

 

“Sen. Elizabeth Warren at Native American forum: ‘I am sorry …”

https://abcnews.go.com › Politics › story

 

“Warren apologizes for heritage claim, woos Native Americans”

https://www.apnews.com › …

 

“Democratic hopeful Warren apologizes for Native American …”

https://www.reuters.com › article › us-usa-election-warren › democratic-ho…

 

“Elizabeth Warren releases plan aimed at uplifting Native …”

https://www.usatoday.com › story › news › politics › elections › 2019/08/16

 

Boy…, nothing really too critical of Warren there…, mostly apologetic and in the best light possible.  None of the sources would be considered “conservative” either.

Quite different from the search results that would show up for President Trump, I imagine.

Some of the keywords that would show up in a search like that, if it were President Trump, would be:

“LIAR,”

“RACIST,”

“FRAUD,”

“PHONY,”

“IMPOSTER,”

“CHEATER,”

“CON ARTIST,”

…, just for starters.

Am I wrong?

Recently, according to The Daily Caller, Warren said, “I am sorry for harm I have caused.  I have listened and I have learned a lot, and I am grateful for the many conversations that we’ve had together.”

Oh…, well, alrighty then!  Say no more, Elizabeth!  Your sins have been officially absolved by the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media!”

Bishop Zubik hears young woman's confession at pro-life youth rally and Mass in Washington

This absolution is, of course, reserved for liberals…, especially white, privileged, establishment, liberals. Being a woman on top of it all doesn’t hurt either.

fraud 9

Black, Hispanic, and especially Native American liberals do not normally receive this level of consideration.

As they say…, “you could look it up.”

fraud 14

fraud 13

fraud 12

fraud 11

fraud 10

fraud 3

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

 

Surprise, surprise, surprise…, Google has a liberal bias!

No kidding!

That’s really not a surprise or “news” to any of us who pay attention.

It’s old news, but still news that we need to stay on top of.

It goes beyond “bias,” however.

The question is, why do these people (liberals) feel it’s okay to cheat, unfairly influence, and deceive others in order to help their anti-American cause?

bias 3

Dr. Robert Epstein recently appeared on the show “Life, Liberty & Levin,” which is a show on FOX, hosted by Mark Levin.

bias 1

bias 2

Based on a study he conducted, he claims Google reflected a “very dramatic bias” in 2016 election search results on their search engine.

According to Dr. Epstein, “Google offered search results during the 2016 election season that manipulated voters in Hillary Clinton’s favor.”

bias 7

“The study looked into ‘politically oriented searches’ from a ‘diverse group of American voters,’ Epstein said in the interview.

“In 2016, I set up the first-ever monitoring system that allowed me to look over the shoulders of a diverse group of American voters — there were 95 people in 24 states,” he said.

“I looked at politically oriented searches that these people were conducting on Google, Bing and Yahoo. I was able to preserve more than 13,000 searches and 98,000 web pages, and I found very dramatic bias in Google’s search results… favoring Hillary Clinton — whom I supported strongly.”

So all of this is coming from a former Hillary Clinton supporter on top of it.

bias 5

I actually experienced some crazy search results myself on Google.

I was doing some research for an article on Bill Clinton’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein and the whole “Pedophile Island” thing.

I entered “Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein” for my search, as I was looking to find a few pictures of the two.

To my amazement the first picture, the very first picture, that came up was a picture of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein!

bias 10

Hmmm?

Now how could that happen unless Google programmers tied “Donald Trump” to any search that was conducted regarding Jeffrey Epstein?

The fact is that the Google search engine will VERY rarely direct you to any article or resource of a positive nature regarding President Trump.

bias 8

In an effort to supposedly address this internal bias, Google has come out with some new “community guideline,” aimed at limiting political talk among its employees.”

Ha!

Ya…, that’ll take care of the problem.

“That level of bias was sufficient, I calculated, to have shifted over time somewhere between 2.6 and 10.4 million votes to Hillary without anyone knowing that this had occurred,” Dr. Epstein continued.

Mark Levin asked Epstein how such bias and influence could be credited to Google and their search suggestions and results?

Epstein replied that, “People searching Google for politically relevant or election-related information will see search suggestions pop up as they type, and also see a number of top searches on the first page of their results.”

bias 9

“We now know that those search suggestions have a very, very powerful effect on people and that they alone can shift opinions and votes dramatically and then search results appear below,” he added.

After hearing about Epstein’s research and report, President Trump tweeted, “Report just out! Google manipulated from the 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 election! This was put out by a Clinton supporter, not a Trump Supporter! Google should be sued. My victory was even bigger than thought!”

bias 4

I couldn’t agree with you more, Mr. President.

Your victory was bigger than anyone could ever imagine.

And believe me…, the democrats are bound and determined to beat you in 2020 AT ALL COSTS…, and I mean AT ALL COSTS.

Media manipulation.

Polling manipulation.

Manufactured votes.

Fraudulent votes.

Vote obstruction.

We’re going to see it all at rates that are beyond comparison to prior elections.

Hold onto your hats my friends!

Like the democrats like to say, “Let’s get out there and vote early and vote often!”

bias 11

Thank you to Charles Creitz and Joseph Wulfsohn of Fox News for contributing to this article.

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

 

A onetime illegal immigrant and a “Dreamer” is running for Congress…, as a Pro-Trump Republican!

Ha!

Interesting!

This is awesome!

Tell me more!

According to Joshua Nelson for Fox News, “A Pro-Trump immigrant is challenging a Democrat incumbent in Michigan.”

immi 2

A “pro-Trump immigrant?!”

You won’t see the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media” touching this story with a ten foot pole!

“The Republican congressional candidate, Whittney Williams, shares her unique story, as she challenges Democrat Rep. Haley Stevens in Michigan.”

immi 4

“A pro-Trump immigrant and Republican congressional candidate who initially came to the U.S. illegally told Fox News she was a ‘Dreamer’ for 16 years and ‘it’s not a good life.’”

‘“I don’t wish that life upon anybody and that’s why I feel the need to speak up now, because the narrative from the left is not portraying that side of the story well,’ Whittney Williams told [the hosts of the show] ‘Fox & Friends.’”

So let me get this right…, “the narrative from the left is not portraying that side of the story well…,” and this is coming from someone who was an illegal immigrant and classified as a “Dreamer.”

Hmmm, that’s odd, isn’t it?

The “left,” meaning the democrats and the “biased, liberal propaganda, fake news media,” are being disingenuous, AGAIN, with their portrayal of the situation here for their own benefit.

Same old story…, same old song and dance.

“Williams arrived in the U.S. at age 10 with her family, which she said came on a tourist visa. She and her family overstayed their visa, living in the U.S. illegally.”

‘“I was basically called a Dreamer,’ Williams, now 37, said while also noting she did not speak English at the time.”

Now this is a true “overcoming the odds,” success story that needs to be trumpeted!

Williams has since married an American, and thus became a legal American citizen.

‘“The DACA and DREAM act didn’t work for me because, even though it was proposed in 2001, nothing was done even though Obama campaigned on passing the DREAM Act in his first term and second term,’ she said. ‘But then nothing was done and so he used an unconstitutional executive order to put DACA in place.’”

Hmmm. That’s odd.  You mean to tell me we have a democrat promising to do things, over and over again, in two elections, and then not getting it done?

Unlike President Trump, who has virtually kept ALL of his campaign promises.

Like they say…, you could look it up.

immi 8

“DACA was created under an executive order in 2012. The program granted illegal immigrants or ‘Dreamers’ who were brought to the United States as children the opportunity to receive a renewable two-year reprieve from deportation and become eligible for a work permit.”

‘“I know that President Trump is trying his best to find a permanent solution for those that are here like me, Dreamers.’”

immi 6

“Williams is challenging Democrat Rep. Haley Stevens in Michigan’s 11th Congressional District. She says her opponent has a voting record that ‘is not in line with the values of Michiganders because in the Midwest we have different values (than) in California so it doesn’t go well for our constituents.’”

immi 9

What kind of “different values?!”

You mean you don’t want to put the needs of illegal immigrants ahead of the needs of your citizens?

immi 7

Do you mean you don’t want rampant homelessness in your cites?

And are you saying you have something against a “poop patrol?!”

And what about those evil plastic straws?

“Stevens last year flipped a Republican seat previously held by retired GOP Rep. Dave Trott.”

Well…, you might have a challenge on your hands here, Ms. Williams.  Your constituency is obviously mentally challenged.

But you go girl!

immi 5

I’ll be keeping an eye on that congressional race.

Help Make America Great Again and Keep America Great in 2020!

immi 3

 

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

How far “left” is too far “left” for “the left?”

The answer to this question appears to be, “We have not yet begun to propose crazy liberal policies!”

Yes…, stay posted my friends.

It seems that every new day brings yet another wacky idea from the collection of democrat presidential candidates, regarding a new program for them to hand out our money, to buy more votes, and to grow more government, while essentially trying to destroy America, as we know her, along the way.

libs 1

Our lefty politicians don’t even really understand how far “left” they are!

I believe they actually think they represent a “typical American.”

In the places they represent (remember the small areas of blue on the voting map of America) that may be true.  There, their ideas are accepted, lauded and encouraged, while everywhere else we are left shaking our heads and wondering, “Who are these people and what country do they live in?”

libs 11

libs 2

Even Black Entertainment Television (BET) founder, Robert Johnson, told CNBC that “The democratic party has “moved too far to the left” and has “become too liberal to defeat President Trump.”

Robert Johnson is the country’s first African-American billionaire, according to Forbes Business Magazine.

Hmmm.  The big liberal propaganda machine is going to have to be careful with this one, although I’m sure he’ll be labeled as an “Uncle Tom” before too long if he doesn’t come around to “the left’s” way of thinking and their narrative of choice.

libs 9

Brian Flood of Fox News reported that, ‘“I think at the end of the day, if a Democrat is going to beat Trump, then that person, he or she, will have to move to the center and you can’t wait too long to do that,’ Johnson said. ‘The message of some of the programs that Democrats are pushing are not resonating with the majority of the American people.’”

The problem is that liberals don’t even consider the American people, who support President Trump, people!

libs 8

“Johnson, a long time democrat, said the current far-left state of the Democratic Party will work well in the primaries but won’t help in a general election, especially since he feels Trump has his base locked up. The BET founder, who supported Hillary Clinton in 2016, even praised some of Trump’s recent accomplishments.”

‘“I think the economy is doing great, and it’s particularly reaching populations that heretofore had very bad problems in terms of jobs and employments and the opportunities that come with employment,’ Johnson said. ‘African-American unemployment is at its lowest level…  I give the president a lot of credit for moving the economy in a positive direction that’s benefiting a large amount of Americans.’”

But yet, in the 2020 presidential election, 85%-90% of African-Americans will continue to vote for the democrat candidate.

libs 4

The spell the democrats have over African-Americans is a strong one, but more and more are coming to their senses and seeing things as they really are, like Mr. Johnson here.

“Johnson said he gives Trump an ‘A+’ for the economy and added that the divisive politics [of democrats] are ‘not helping America.’”

Ouch!  That really stings for our current collection of socialist democrat presidential candidates.

libs 6

But don’t worry…, this won’t phase them much.  They’ll just reload their fake reality, continue to propose fake solutions to real problems, and stupid solutions to fake problems.

WINNING!

libs 8

libs 7

libs 3

libs 5

libs 10

NOTE:  If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article.  From there you can let me know you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the “Follow” button which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.

Thank you, MrEricksonRules.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑