The term “Decepticon” may be a foreign one to many of my readers, and a very familiar term to others.
The “Decepticons” are a part of the “Transformers” family. That may help more of my readers.
The name “Decepticon” refers to deception, or attempting to deceive.
That’s where I’m trying to go with this.
Let’s call out some of our political “decepticons”…, those pretending to be Independents, those pretending to be Republicans, and those pretending to be Americans!
Regarding The Senate…, they say the democrats “control The Senate,” which means they control the agenda, and what gets voted on and what doesn’t. This is because the Senate is split 50-50, with Vice President Harris breaking the tie, making it 51-50.
But wait…, is it really? How can that be? There are only 48 democrat senators in The Senate.
It’s true.
If you look at the make-up of The Senate, there are 50 republicans, 48 democrats, and 2 “independents.”
The two senators who identify as being an “independent” are Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Senator Angus King of Maine, however, they also say these senators choose to caucus with the democrats, thus adding to their numbers.
I say they shouldn’t be able to have it both ways. Either identify as a democrat or not.
This brings to the forefront the most egregious “decepticon” of all, Senator Bernie Sanders. Honestly, I had never even heard of Senator Angus King before.
Does anyone actually believe that Bernie Sanders is an Independent?
I mean he has run for president as a democrat (TWICE), and his socialist ideologies would even place him on the far left edge of the democrat party these days, which is really saying something! Russia and China would probably even have to reign him in a bit!
Our next group of “decepticons” would be those “republicans” who should really identify as democrats, and those whose allegiance really lies with “the swamp.”
Heading up the “swamp” list of “decepticons” are Senators Mitch “Swamp Turtle” McConnell and Lindsey Graham.
Those “republicans” who we see “transforming” into democrats from time to time are, Mitt Romney, Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, Susan Collins, and Lisa Murkowski.
The list of the democrat “decepticons” masquerading as Americans, while disregarding the oath they all took to follow and protect The Constitution, is quite long, in fact.
Just for starters, this list would include “the big guy,” the “illegitimate guy,” Joe Biden, “Cackling” Kamala Harris, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, Maxine Waters, Jerrold Nadler, Adam Schiff, Pramiya Jayapal, Eric Swalwell, and Cori Bush. And again, that’s just for starters.
Yes, my friends, it’s getting to the point where the democrat “decepticons” don’t even bother to hide the fact that they’re anti-American anymore. This can be done when they aren’t even worried about the opinion of voters anymore, since the democrats can just manipulate the vote in their favor…, and get away with it.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Illegitimate and cognitively challenged, Joe Biden.
“Cackling” Kamala Harris.
“Lyin’, Cryin’, UpChuck” Schumer.
And, “Crazy Nancy” Pelosi
Our country is the leader of the free world, and this is the best we can come up with?
And these people have been in elected office for a combined 125+ years!
Please notice that all of these people are either from the West coast or the East coast.
That alone is not a good sign.
Our methods of selecting governmental representatives must be seriously flawed.
Either that, or the American people aren’t as smart as we think we are.
In any case, God, help us, and God help the world.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
“H.R. 1” represents the House of Representatives’ bill with the highest priority…, and it is obvious why.
According to Betsy McCaughey, for The Boston Herald, “Nancy Pelosi’s top priority is to turn America into a one-party nation ruled by Democrats. Her bill HR 1 trashes the U.S. Constitution in an attempt to rig the system and make it virtually impossible to elect a Republican president or Congress again. It’s a power grab.”
The “For the People Act” has nothing to do with “The People,” and everything to do with “the democrats.”
On a side note, why does it seem that everything the democrats are doing lately seems to “trash the U.S. Constitution?’
Have you noticed this?
Didn’t all of these people take an oath to preserve and protect The Constitution?
Just sayin’.
“The bill eviscerates [“Eviscerates” is a strong word!] state voting laws and forces all the states to conform to a set of rules that includes automatic voter registration. Anyone who goes to a DMV or applies for food stamps, Medicaid or other social services, or attends a public college will be automatically enrolled to vote.”
It’s our right to NOT vote as well, isn’t it?
It’s our right to NOT have someone vote on our behalf without our permission, isn’t it?
Well, isn’t it?
“Noncitizens are obligated to identify themselves and opt out, but there are no criminal penalties if they don’t.”
The fact that in some states, “noncitizens” can get driver’s licenses, food stamps, Medicaid, other social services, or attend a public college, is a whole other issue…, but they should not be allowed to register to vote, and it should not be up to them to “opt out.”
“From California to New York, Democrats are already pushing to allow noncitizens to vote in local elections. They see this as their roadmap to a future permanent majority.”
Maybe “yes,” and maybe “no.”
Just because democrats let them in doesn’t necessarily mean they want to see America devolve into the socialist and totalitarian nightmares they just came from.
“HR 1’s bag of tricks also includes banning state voter ID requirements. Anyone can show up on Election Day to vote, registered or not, and simply sign a statement that they’re a legal voter.”
So, they’re saying voting is less important than:
Buying alcohol
Buying cigarettes
Sitting at a bar
Renting a car
Getting on an airplane
Adopting a pet
Renting a hotel room
Applying for a fishing license
Buying a cell phone
Visiting a casino
Picking up a prescription
Donating blood
Buying an “M” rated video game
Purchasing nail polish at CVS
Purchasing certain cold medicines
Attending the democrat national convention
Is that what they’re saying?
Yes…, that’s what they’re saying.
“HR 1 is being sold as a reform to make voting easier.”
Well, HR 1 definitely does that!
“In truth, it makes cheating easier.”
And we’ve already seen evidence of that in the 2020 election.
“HR 1 compels states to send out absentee or mail-in ballots universally, favoring Democrats who tend to use this method.”
The republicans may be forced to use this “method” as well in future elections.
I mean, you’ve got to fight fire with fire, right?
We may see a day, in the future, where there are more votes tallied than people living in America!
“It also forces states to count ballots that arrive by mail as late as 10 days after the election. Say goodbye to election night finality.”
“HR 1 also legalizes ballot harvesting, a practice many states are struggling to stop. A political organization pays a worker to walk through housing projects and neighborhoods, knock on doors, offer to help residents fill out the ballots they’ve received in the mail, and then submit the piles of completed ballots. It’s a recipe for fraud.”
“It’s also unconstitutional.”
“The authors of the Constitution worried that Congress would try to seize control of presidential selection using dirty tricks like those in HR 1. That’s why they acted to ‘to take the business as far as possible out of their hands,’ according to Charles Pinckney, a framer from South Carolina.”
“Congress, said Pinckney, ‘had no right to meddle’ in it. The framers provided in Article II, Sec. 1 that only state legislatures would have the power to determine how the president is chosen. No national rules.”
“But Pelosi has no qualms about trashing the Constitution to kneecap her opponents.”
There they go “trashing the Constitution, again.
“HR 1 also asserts Congress has the authority to make the District of Columbia into the 51st state. That would hand Democrats two more Senate seats, breaking the current 50-50 tie. Voter registration in D.C. is 76% Democratic and only 6% Republican.”
The recent election indicates the percentage is much higher than that, with over 92% of the votes going to democrats.
“Pelosi ignores that only a constitutional amendment can change the status or parameters of the district.”
“HR 1 also would expose supporters of conservative causes to disclosure and harassment. In 2013, then-President Barack Obama’s Internal Revenue Service tried to strong-arm tax-exempt tea party organizations into disclosing their donors. Pelosi’s bill would give that thuggish tactic the force of law, requiring organizations to disclose their donors.”
“Pelosi’s democracy-destroying bill will pass in the House, where Democrats have a majority [and have no problem with destroying democracy].”
“President Joe Biden has promised to sign it if it passes the Senate. So much for Biden’s unity pledge.”
And, because Illegitimate Joe just signs what they tell him to.
“Under current Senate rules, 60 votes are needed to enact HR 1. Democrats don’t have them yet. It’s up to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to protect the 60-vote filibuster rule. He’s called the bill ‘the Democratic Politician Protection Act,’ and deplores it as a naked attempt to change the election rules to benefit one party.”
It’s really cringeworthy when we have to count on Mitch McConnell to do anything.
“The bill is just what you’d expect from Pelosi. But the Senate needs to rise to the occasion and protect honest, competitive elections — the foundation of our freedom.”
The RStreet.org website says,
“H.R. 1 is likely the most consequential piece of election-related legislation in years and mostly in a bad way. Let’s be clear: it should be easier to participate in elections and easier to talk about elections. Anything that does the opposite is a bad idea.”
“As an organization, R Street stands strongly for the cause of political reform, and we will always support good policy. H.R. 1 is not good policy.”
The Heritage Foundation adds, about HR 1, that, “It would implement nationwide the worst changes in election rules that occurred during the 2020 election and go even further in eroding and eliminating basic security protocols that states have in place.”
“It would make it a criminal offense for a state official to reject a voter registration application even when it is rejected ‘under color of law’ [whatever that means] because the official believes the individual is ineligible to vote. It would also require states to allow 16-year-olds and 17-year-olds to register; when combined with a ban on voter ID and restrictions on the ability to challenge the eligibility of a voter, this would effectively ensure that underage individuals could vote with impunity.”
“Require states to count ballots cast by voters outside of their assigned precincts, overriding the precinct system used by almost all states that allows election officials to monitor votes, staff polling places, provide enough ballots, and prevent election fraud.”
“Mandate no-fault absentee ballots, which are the tool of choice for vote thieves. It would ban witness signature or notarization requirements for absentee ballots; force states to accept absentee ballots received up to 10 days after Election Day as long as they are postmarked by Election Day; and require states to allow vote trafficking (vote harvesting) so that any third parties—including campaign staffers and political consultants—can pick up and deliver absentee ballots.”
“H.R. 1 would add a provision criminalizing ‘hindering, interfering, or preventing’ anyone from registering or voting, which is so vague and so broad that it could prevent providing any information to election officials about the ineligibility of an individual, such as an applicant not being a U.S. citizen.”
“Reduce the number of Federal Election Commission members from six to five, allowing the political party with three commission seats to control the commission and engage in partisan enforcement activities.”
“Authorize the Internal Revenue Service to engage in partisan activity. H.R. 1 would permit the IRS to investigate and consider the political and policy positions of nonprofit organizations before granting tax-exempt status, thus enabling IRS officials to target organizations engaging in First Amendment activity with disfavored views.”
“Limit access to federal courts for anyone challenging H.R. 1. The bill would prohibit the filing of any lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of H.R. 1 anywhere except in the District Court for the District of Columbia and would allow the court to order all plaintiffs and intervenors, regardless of their number (such as all 50 states), ‘to file joint papers or to be represented by a single attorney at oral argument,’ severely limiting the legal representation and due process rights of challengers.”
Wow, they have really thought of everything!
We ARE living in America, aren’t we?
These democrats seem hell-bent on dragging us into some kind of Nazi Germany scenario.
And they have the unmitigated nerve to call this the “For The People Act” on top of it all.
There is no question that the democrats are completely un-American and have no shame.
No shame, whatsoever.
I have many blogs out here regarding democrat voting shenanigans you can check out as well.
The following blog links contain some of my suggestions to improve our voting process.
These would be things that should be included in HR 1 if the democrats were really interested in improving the process for “We The People.”
‘“If the American people lose confidence in the integrity of our election system, we are one big step closer to our republic dissolving right before our eyes.’ – MrEricksonRules”
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
According to Edmund DeMarche of Fox News, “Former President Trump told Fox News that he expressed concern over the crowd size near the Capitol days before last month’s deadly riots and personally requested 10,000 National Guard troops be deployed in response.”
Didi you get that?
“FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP TOLD FOX NEWS THAT HE EXPRESSED CONCERN OVER THE CROWD SIZE NEAR THE CAPITOL DAYS BEFORE LAST MONTHS (deadly?) RIOTS AND PERSONALLY REQUESTED 10,000 NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS BE DEPLOYED IN RESPONSE!”
“[President] Trump told ‘The Next Revolution with Steve Hilton’ that his team alerted the Department of Defense days before the rally that crowds might be larger than anticipated and 10,000 national guardsmen should be ready to deploy. He said that — from what he understands — the warning was passed along to leaders at the Capitol, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — and he heard that the request was rejected because these leaders did not like the optics of 10,000 troops at the Capitol.’”
‘“So, you know, that was a big mistake,’ he said.”
I think that’s being generous, Mr. President.
“Pelosi’s office and the Defense Department did not immediately respond to an email inquiry from Fox News.”
Hmmm, that’s odd.
Not!
“Trump told Steve Hilton, the show’s host, that he ‘hated to see what unfolded on Jan. 6 at the U.S. Capitol.’”
“Much of what led to the riot at the Capitol remains a mystery.”
And that’s just the way the democrats like it.
“Last week, former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund told a bipartisan Senate panel that he didn’t know then that his officers had received a report from the FBI’s field office in Norfolk, Virginia, that forecast, in detail, the chances that extremists could bring ‘war’ to Washington the following day.”
“His officers received a report?”
Which officers, exactly?
From who…, exactly?
I mean what was their name?
And the Capitol Police Chief was not informed about this?
Who failed to inform him…, exactly?
I mean what was their name?
The FBI’s field office is saying that “extremists could bring ‘war’ to Washington the following day,” and the Capitol Police do nothing with that information?
Really?
“The head of the FBI’s office in Washington has said that once he received the Jan. 5 warning, the information was quickly shared with other law enforcement agencies through a joint terrorism task force.”
And, again, apparently there are no actual, real, accountable people working in these “law enforcement agencies” and this “joint terrorism task force.” They just, apparently, generically communicate with computer systems, or robots, or something.
But, based on his own recent senate testimony, this information wasn’t shared with FBI Director, Christopher Wray, however, or maybe he just “forgot.” It must be a condition that comes with the job.
Again, who failed to inform him…, exactly?
I mean what was their name?
Is no one held accountable for anything anymore?
It seems to me this whole thing could have been avoided if these people would have just done their job.
But, maybe, not doing their job was their job in this case?
“Sund and House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving also could not agree on when National Guard assistance was requested.”
“Sund said he submitted the request at 1:09 p.m. on Jan. 6. But Irving insisted he did not receive the request for National Guard support until after 2 p.m. while in former Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger’s office. When pressed, Irving said he took a call from Sund before while on the Congress floor.”
What does “after 2 p.m. mean?”
2:01 p.m.?
2:15 p.m.?
3:00 p.m.?
5:00 p.m.?
8:00 p.m.?
George Petras, Janet Loehrke, Ramon Padilla, Javier Zarracina and Jennifer Borresen, of USA TODAY, report that, “Here is how events unfolded [on Jan. 6]. Times are estimates.
“6 a.m. – Crowds of Trump supporters, estimated in the thousands, prepare for a pro-Trump rally near the Ellipse. Many began gathering the night before.”
“11 a.m. – [President] Trump’s “Save America Rally” begins first with the President’s sons Eric and Donald Trump Jr., then his lawyer, Rudy Giuliani. Trump starts speaking at about 11:50 a.m. and speaks for more than an hour.
12:15 – Some of the huge crowd heads over towards the Capitol.
“1 p.m. – Lawmakers gather for a joint session in the House of Representatives chamber to count Electoral College votes.”
Again, remember, “Sund said he submitted the request at 1:09 p.m. on Jan. 6. But Irving insisted he did not receive the request for National Guard support until after 2 p.m. while in former Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger’s office. When pressed, Irving said he took a call from Sund while on the Congress floor.”
Don’t you think, even at the earlier time, this was a little late to be requesting troops?
Well, not if you wanted to appear as if you called in help, but not before the protesters did enough to satisfy the “insurrection” narrative.
“1:10 p.m. – Rioters begin grappling with police on the Capitol steps.”
“1:26 p.m. – Capitol police order evacuation of Library of Congress, Madison Building and Cannon House Office Building on Independence Avenue across from the Capitol.”
“1:40 p.m. – D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser orders citywide curfew starting at 6 p.m. Wednesday and ending at 6 a.m. Thursday. CNN reports District police are asking for more law enforcement.”
Gee, thanks for your support, Mayor.
“2:11 p.m. – Rioters breach police lines on the west side of the Capitol.”
“2:22 p.m. – Reports say Vice President Mike Pence has been escorted out of the Senate chamber.”
“2:33 p.m. – C-SPAN reports rioters have crossed Statuary Hall, the chamber that separates the House and Senate, heading for the House and Senate.”
“2:38 p.m. – [President] Trump tweets, ‘Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful!’”
Sounds like something someone inciting a riot would say.
“2:44 p.m. – Shots are reported fired in the House chamber.”
“2:47 p.m. – Huffington Post reporter tweets image of rioters at the dais. ‘They’re in the chamber.’”
We did see some members of the Capitol Police opening barricades for some protesters (just the ones they wanted), waving them through, and other capitol police doing nothing as protesters walked down hallways, and meandered leisurely through the Congressional chambers.
“3:03 p.m. – Rioters are photographed on the Senate floor.”
In most cases, there were more people taking pictures of the rioters in the Capitol building than there were rioters! You could make the case that this was the most well documented “insurrection” in history.
That would jive with my take on the whole event.
“3:13 p.m. – Trump tweets: ‘I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order – respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!’”
Again, sounds like something someone inciting a riot would say.
“3:34 p.m. – CBS reports a woman is in critical condition after being shot in the neck inside the Capitol. Police later report the woman died. She was identified as Ashli Babbitt, 35, an Air Force veteran.”
“3:51 p.m. – The District of Columbia National Guard, about 1,100 troops, is mobilized to support local law enforcement.”
This is only about three hours after they would have helpful.
“4:17 p.m. – In a tweeted video lasting just over a minute, Trump says, in part: ‘I know your pain. I know you’re hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. … So, go home. We love you, you’re very special. … I know how you feel. But go home and go home in peace.’”
“8 p.m. – Congress reconvenes to resume counting Electoral College votes.”
Oh, yes…, above all else we must get those Electoral College votes counted, certifying Illegitimate Joe as the next president.
“Aftermath: Five believed dead, at least 68 arrested.”
Around 200 would eventually be arrested.
None with weapons charges, that were in the Capitol.
Soooo, our Capitol was breached and occupied by an unarmed group of people?
Quite a brutal “insurrection!”
“D.C. Police Chief Robert Contee said that, in addition to the woman shot by Capitol police, two men and one woman died in ‘separate medical emergencies.’ At least 14 of Contee’s officers were injured during the demonstrations, he said.”
“Police identified the woman shot and killed [by a U.S. Capitol Police officer] during the riot as Ashli Babbitt, 35, of San Diego, who was a military veteran.”
“A U.S. Capitol Police officer died Thursday after being injured when supporters of President Donald Trump raided the Capitol building on Wednesday, bringing the total number of fatalities to five.”
“Brian D. Sicknick ‘was injured while physically engaging with protesters’ on Wednesday, USCP said in a statement. He returned to his division office and collapsed, then was taken to a local hospital where he died Thursday evening.”
“The other three who perished that day were Benjamin Phillips, 50, from Ringtown, Pennsylvania; Kevin Greeson, 55, from Athens, Alabama; and Rosanne Boyland, 34, from Kennesaw, Georgia. Contee said Thursday all three died on Capitol grounds, but he didn’t specify how.”
“Howard Charles Liebengood, a US Capitol Police officer, died while off-duty on Saturday, according to a statement released Sunday by the Capitol Police and the White House. The department did not disclose the cause of the officer’s death, but The Washington Post and other news sources citing a family spokesperson said he died by suicide.”
Sooo, the ONLY person who died in the Capitol building was an unarmed protester, who was shot by the Capitol Police. This murder is still “under investigation,” by the way.
This officer obviously didn’t get the memo and thought this was a real “insurrection.”
DeMarche, of Fox News, continues by saying, “Sund and Irving disagreed on when the National Guard was called and on requests for the guard beforehand. Sund said he spoke to both Stenger and Irving about requesting the National Guard in the days before the riot, and that Irving said he was concerned about the ‘optics’ of having them present. Irving denied that, saying Sund’s account was ‘categorically false.’”
Ohhh, Irving was “concerned about the optics” of having the National Guard present.
Excuse me, but WHO THE HELL IS THIS IRVING TO BE MAKING THIS TYPE OF DECISION?!
Do you really thing that Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving has this kind of authority?
It’s very obvious that either Sund or Irving are lying…, and my money is on Irving.
Do you really think that Nancy Pelosi would allow any of these Capitol security decisions to be made without her blessing or direction?
Do you really think that Nancy Pelosi was unaware of any of the possible security threat intel or President Trump’s request for National Guard troops?
Do you really think that?
I don’t think you can possibly think that.
“Republicans have signaled that evidence could show that Democrat leaders were aware of the threat and did little to prevent the Jan. 6 attack.”
Okay…, now we’re getting somewhere!
THE REAL QUESTION IS, WHY WOULD DEMOCRAT LEADERS, WHO WERE AWARE OF THE THREAT, DO LITTLE TO PREVENT THE EVENTS OF JAN.6?
I believe the answer is very simple.
THE DEMOCRATS WANTED THE CAPITOL TO BE BREACHED!
And why would they want that you might ask?
Well, there are multiple reasons, in my opinion.
One…, this would enable another impeachment of President Trump via their fabricated incitement claims.
Two…, this would justify establishing a police state around the Capitol.
And, three…, this would lay the foundation for their demonization of Trump supporters, allowing them to classify Trump supporters as “domestic terrorists.”
“Pelosi said the commission will ‘investigate and report on the facts and causes relating to the January 6, 2021, domestic terrorist attack upon the United States Capitol Complex … and relating to the interference with the peaceful transfer of power.’”
I’m going to go out on a limb here and predict this commission will do little more than muddy the waters and cover-up what really occurred.
But really, which scenario is more plausible?
The most powerful country in the world having it’s capitol overrun and occupied by a bunch of unarmed protesters in a matter of minutes, or the scenario I’m suggesting?
“[President] Trump said he hated to see the riot but compared it to unrest that occurred in cities like Portland and Seattle.”
‘“I hate to see any of that, but it is a double standard,’ he said.”
It is definitely a double standard, Mr. President, and I would tend to agree with your comparison…, except the riots in Portland and Seattle, and elsewhere, lasted for months, not a couple of hours…, and the Capitol riot was not supported, and encouraged, by democrats, like the Portland and Seattle riots were.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
In a retrospect to my previously published blog about the human poop problem in the wonderful “city by the bay,” San Francisco, California, which is in Nancy Pelosi’s district, by the way.
According to Greg Norman for Fox News, “San Francisco’s mayor has created a new program called ‘Poop Patrol’ to clean up the human waste [from the ever-growing homeless population] from the infested sidewalks.”
Sounds lovely.
This program is driven by a smartphone “App” that allows concerned citizens to report offending piles of excrement to the proper authorities!
Only in a liberal city gone mad!
“The details of the complaints that the San Francisco Department of Public Works has received are unclear, but data shows the number of sightings has increased dramatically since 2011. That year, 5,547 human feces incidents were reported. The number rose to 28,084 in 2018.”
Holy sh*t, Batman! Now, that’s a lot of crap! And that’s only the crap that was reported! There’s bound to be twice that much crap lying around in reality!
This is the socialist utopia that democrats want to help spread to a city or town near you!
Stay thirsty my friends…, but don’t drink the liberal Kool-Aide…, or step without looking first…, at least in San Francisco!
President Trump was literally correct when he referred to these democrat strongholds as sh*tholes!
Now please, sing along with me to the tune of “I left my heart in San Francisco.”
I left a steaming pile, in San Francisco
Right there on the street, it calls to me
To be where little cable cars climb halfway to the stars
The morning fog may chill the air, I don’t care
My turd waits there, in San Francisco
Next to the blue and windy sea
When I come home to you, oh-oh San Francisco
Your endless piles of poo will welcome me
Here’s another sung to “Old MacDonald Had a Farm.”
Nancy Pelosi reps a town E-I-E-I-O!
And in that town are a lot of dems, E-I-E-I-O!
With a democrat here, and a democrat there
Here a dem there a dem, everywhere a dumb dem!
Nancy Pelosi reps a town E-I-E-I-O!
Nancy Pelosi reps a town E-I-E-I-O!
And in this town there’s a lot of poop, E-I-E-I-O!
With a poo-poo here, and a poo-poo there
Here a poo, there a poo, everywhere a poo-poo!
Nancy Pelosi reps a town E-I-E-I-O!
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Now that President Trump is in the process of being cheated out of his re-election?
Nancy Pelosi was re-elected as the Speaker of The House of Representatives, for the 117th Congress, on January 3rd.
During her speech to the new Congress, we heard a masked Pelosi, even though there was no one within ten feet of her, declare that this is now “a time to heal.”
Excuse me…, but I can think of like 74 million Trump voters off the top of my head who would disagree with you, Nancy!
There is no “healing” anymore after the way you and your democrat friends shamefully treated our president…, President Trump, during his four years in office…, and then stole the 2020 election.
No…, there is no “getting along” or “healing anymore.
This has now become a war to save America.
You said that “prayers are needed now.”
Who or what do you and your ilk pray to, Nancy?
You don’t really expect us to believe that God endorses your Godless beliefs and behavior, do you…, or that you ask Him for help with your depraved agenda?
I mean, c’mon, really?
You’ve gotta give us some credit!
Either you are a complete manipulative, hypocritical, phony, or you are just really screwed up.
My vote is you’re a complete manipulative, hypocritical, phony.
You then went on to call for “justice.”
“Economic justice,”
“Health justice,”
“Racial justice,”
And “environmental and climate justice.”
I think you think “justice” means advancing the liberal, socialist, and globalist agenda in these areas.
The “justice” we really need is:
Justice for unborn babies in the womb,
Election justice,
Uncensored freedom of speech,
Justice in media coverage,
And most ironically, justice from the Department of Justice and the FBI.
You then finished by saying, “no one in America should be left out or left behind.”
If that statement wasn’t so sad it would be hilarious!
Have you actually stepped foot in your own district in San Francisco, California?
Granted, you’d have to be careful so as to not step in a pile of human excrement, which is a major problem in your idyllic city!
But if you were able to visit your district without getting your shoes dirty, you would see thousands and thousands of homeless people who have been “left out or left behind.”
Doesn’t charity begin at home?
You can’t even take care of your own little district, but you want to lecture the rest of us regarding what we should strive for as a country?
These are just move disingenuous empty words from another corrupt politician.
Oh…, that reminds me…, we also need some political justice!
I won’t be holding my breath waiting for that either, however.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Yes, welcome ladies and gentlemen to the first annual “Fredo” Awards!
We all know how much liberal elitists like giving each other awards and receiving awards, so I thought I would hand out some awards of my own that these liberal losers have actually earned.
If you’re not familiar with the term, what exactly does being a “Fredo” refer to?
According to the Urban Dictionary website, “In proper application referring to someone as a ‘Fredo’ means they are just a dumb [a$$] loser like ‘The Godfather’ movie character,” who was the weak and naïve son and brother.
There you have it!
So, without any further adieu…, on to the awards!
First off, the Honorary “Fredo” Awards.
Our first Honorary “Fredo” Awards go to the award’s namesakes, New York Governor Andrew “Fredo Sr.” Cuomo, and his brother, host of the CNN show, “Cuomo Prime Time,” Chris “Fredo Jr.” Cuomo.
Without these two liberal turds, the “Fredo” awards would not have been possible.
Our next award, and our first category award, goes to The Worst Liberal Politician in a Leading Role.
This was an extremely tough category to award. There were so many worthy recipients. But, in the end, one liberal politician did manage to stand out above the rest…, and that liberal politician is Congresswoman and Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi!
Her incessant lying and obnoxious partisan idiocy seemingly has no limits.
The next award goes to The Worst Liberal Politician in a Supporting Role.
Again, there were so many scumbags worthy of consideration here. But, the worst liberal, and sleaziest democrat, in a Supporting Role has to go to Congressman Adam Schiff.
Like his fearless leader, Nancy Pelosi, Schiff’s continual ability to lie without any apparent conscious, and his ability to shamelessly drive fictitious narratives are unequalled.
Our next award goes to The Worst Costume Design for a Liberal Politician.
The winner of this award really didn’t have any serious challengers.
The winner of the worst costume design for a liberal politician goes to Congresswoman Frederica Smith Wilson of Florida!
Our next award goes to The Worst Adapted Testimony for a Liberal Politician.
The winner of this award becomes our first two-time winner. He wins his second award based on his adaptation of President Trump’s call with Volodymyr Zelensky, the then-newly elected Ukrainian leader. His “adaptation” was later debunked, however, when it was learned there was an actual transcription of the call. Ooops!
So, the winner of the worst adapted testimony by a liberal politician goes to California Congressman, Adam Schiff!
Our next award is the Worst Original Story (hoax) by a liberal politician.
The worst original story (hoax) by a liberal politician has to refer to the whole “Russia collusion” hoax. This hoax unabashedly proclaimed that President Trump was an actual Russian spy and a puppet for Russian President, Vladimir Putin. We heard nightly, for over two years how everyone had proof of this…, but in the end, there was no proof to be found, and no retractions or apologies either.
There were really too many democrats involved in this hoax to award individual awards. These included a President, a Vice President, various Cabinet secretaries, various executive branch officers, members of the DOJ and the FBI, and, of course, the co-conspiratorial mainstream media, just to get the party started.
Accepting this award on behalf of all the treasonous democrat vermin involved in this hoax (and attempted coup), is Rachel Maddow, the clueless MSNBC commentator who willfully and joyfully perpetrated this big lie on a nightly basis.
The next award is for the Worst Speech and Press Briefing Editing.
During the course of the 2020 presidential election campaign, it became common knowledge that Joe Biden utilized a teleprompter for almost everything he said and, even then, he usually managed to stick his foot in his mouth. That, coupled with the cherry picking of “friendly” questions, and the outright refusal to even answer other questions, earned these two individuals their awards.
This award for Worst Speech and Press Briefing Editing goes to Jennifer O’Malley Dillon, Biden’s Campaign Manager, and Joe Biden himself.
The next award is for The Worst News Editing, by a liberal organization, in a supporting role.
We are awarding multiple awards in this category.
Those organizations receiving awards for their anti-American censorship and propaganda by omission are: CNN, MSNBC, Facebook, Twitter and Google.
Congratulations for lowering our news and social media to levels normally seen in Communist China, Russia, North Korea, Venezuela and Cuba.
Our next award is for The Most Clueless Liberal in a supporting role.
Again, there was no shortage of liberals in consideration here, but one individual definitely stood out above the crowd!
This clueless liberal torpedoed thousands of good paying Amazon jobs in her city, wants our country to abandon all civilized progress in the name of climate change, and is campaigning to turn our country into a socialist nightmare.
Taking all of this into consideration, the award for The Most Clueless Liberal in a supporting role can only go to Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
As you can see, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez is so clueless, she is happy about winning this award!
Our next award is for The Biggest Liberal Meathead in a supporting Role.
One “Fredo” nominee clearly stood out for this award. It was actually created especially for him!
The award for The Biggest Liberal Meathead in a supporting Role goes to Californian Congressman Eric Swalwell!
A member of the “Russian collusion hoax club,” Swalwell, we have now learned, carried on about Russian influences in our government, all while he was cavorting around with his own little China doll spy, Christine Fang! You just can’t make this stuff up. I’m sure it was a big surprise to his wife as well. Ouch!
Swalwell even entered the race for president. His campaign lasted about ten minutes. I’m sure Fang encouraged Swalwell and was his driving force!
I can just hear her now…, “Oh, Eric, I love you…, the people love you…, they need a big strong leader like you, Eric…, you must run for president…, you owe it to the American people…, they need you!”
A truer “meathead” you just couldn’t find!
And finally, the “Fredos” inaugural Lifetime Achievement award goes to Seth Myers, host of “Late Night with Seth Myers.”
Seth Myers chose to ruin his show and dedicate at least 10 minutes a night to bashing presidential candidate Donald Trump, and then he beat Hillary Clinton anyway!
We have all heard of the term “influencer.” Seth Myers may now best be known as an “anti-influencer,” since all of his efforts obviously had no effect on the election, and quite possibly the opposite of his desired effect!
Then, having learned nothing from his “influencer” failure, he continued to bash President Trump for another four years on a nightly basis!
President Trump then won again, only to have the election stolen from him.
Well, that wraps-up our award ceremony.
I hope you enjoyed the First Annual “Fredo” Awards!
I know I enjoyed bringing them to you.
I hope to see you next year for the presentations of the Second Annual “Fredo” Awards!
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please choose to “follow” me, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts, and/or leave me a comment. I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
Nobody wants a president who’s a yellow-bellied chicken.
Except democrats, apparently.
Nobody wants a president who can’t stand toe-to-toe with an opponent.
Except democrats, apparently.
Nobody wants a president who can’t think on their feet without the aid of a teleprompter.
Except democrats, apparently.
It would seem they’re less afraid of being called chickens than of being called inept or incapacitated!
I don’t actually believe that Joe Biden is afraid to debate Presiddent Trump…, but he should be.
I believe Joe Biden believes he’s just fine, and capable…, but he isn’t.
I’m sorry, Joe…, but you’re just not “with it” anymore…, if you ever were.
According to Benjamin Fearnow, for Newsweek. “Democratic strategists and supporters of Vice President Joe Biden are urging him not to debate President Donald Trump in the lead-up to Election Day, citing Trump’s publicity stunts and disregard for the rules in 2016.”
Oh, you mean like how Hillary, her people, the DNC, and the fake news media conspired to get her the debate questions before one of the debates in 2016?
Is that the kind of “disregard for the rules” you’re referring to?
And we are completely aware of why “Democratic strategists and supporters of Vice President Joe Biden are urging him not to debate President Donald Trump.”
Because they know Biden is going to look like an incomprehensible old fool and an indefensible old fool, up against President Trump.
President Trump mopped the floor with the other 15 republican candidates in 2016, and then Hillary Clinton as well.
“Former White House Press Secretary, Joe Lockhart, joined several Democratic Party strategists in bluntly advising Biden, ‘whatever you do, don’t debate Trump.’ Speaking on CNN Saturday, Lockhart said Trump shouldn’t be given another platform which will enable him to ‘repeat lies,’ which he said occurred in the 2016 debates against Hillary Clinton.”
It’s hilarious!
These people are on their knees begging Sleepy Joe to bail out of the presidential debates.
They have obviously calculated that it’s better to appear weak and afraid, as opposed to exposing yourself as an incomprehensible old fool and an indefensible old fool.
‘“We saw in the debates in 2016 Hillary Clinton showed a mastery of the issues, every point she made was more honest and bested Trump,’ Lockhart told CNN.”
What debates were you watching, Lockhart?
‘“But Trump came out of the debates doing better I think because he just kept repeating the same old lies: “we’re going to build a wall and Mexico is going to pay for it,” “we’re going to keep all those Mexican rapists out of the country,” and “we’re going to make great trade deals” — none of these things have come to pass.’”
‘“Giving him that national forum to continue to spout — get him to 21,000 or 22,000 lies — I think just isn’t worth it for the Democrats or for Biden,’ Lockhart continued.”
“Several opinion columns published in recent months have called for an outright cancellation of the debates, describing them — alongside the party conventions — as outdated political rituals designed purely for TV ratings.”
“Longtime Democratic strategist and former Hillary Clinton senior adviser Zac Petkanas agreed with calls for Biden to back out of any and all debates with Trump in the coming months.”
“As it stands currently, there are three presidential debates and one vice presidential debate scheduled between September 29 and October 22.”
‘“Biden shouldn’t feel obligated to throw Trump a lifeline by granting him any debates at all. This is not a normal presidential election and Trump is not a legitimate candidate,’ Petkanas tweeted last week.”
“Speculation over the cancellation of the Biden versus Trump 2020 presidential debates increased last week after the University of Notre Dame withdrew its campus as host of the September 29 event over coronavirus concerns. The University of Michigan withdrew from hosting a presidential debate on its campus in June, which has since been rescheduled at the Adrienne Arsht Center in Miami.”
“Political commentator Bill Kristol, a so-called ‘Never Trump’ conservative, praised Notre Dame for withdrawing as host of the first presidential debate over coronavirus concerns.”
‘“Good. No need to go to any trouble to replace this debate. Indeed, I gather Biden’s already all booked up with zoom calls in those weeks. Also, the Jewish holidays. And the new Perry Mason series. Too bad!’ Kristol quipped on Twitter.”
What a pathetic “never Trumper.”
Kristol is just another tool of the old estabilishment politicians who really don’t want to accomplish anything. All they want to do is blow hot air and kick the country’s problems down the road.
“The first presidential debate is now set to take place at Case Western Reserve University and the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland on September 29; the first vice presidential debate is currently set to take place at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City on October 7. The second presidential debate is scheduled for the Arsht Center on October 15, and the third and final debate is set to take place on October 22 on the campus of Belmont University in Nashville.”
But wait…, there’s more!
Crazy Nancy is now joining in with the chorus!
Marisa Schultz of Fox News reports, “Pelosi says Biden shouldn’t debate Trump: ‘I wouldn’t legitimize a conversation with him.’”
“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested Thursday that former Vice President Joe Biden cancel his three scheduled debates with President Trump because the commander-in-chief would ‘belittle’ the forum and engage in ‘skullduggery.’”
“Skullduggery?!”
‘“I don’t think that there should be any debates,’ Pelosi said out of the blue at a news conference at the Capitol, saying she doesn’t want the debates to be ‘an exercise in skullduggery.’”
“Biden told MSNBC Thursday he’s still planning on showing up to the high-profile faceoffs with the president.”
‘“As long as the [debate] commission continues down the straight and narrow as they have, I’m going to debate him,’ Biden said.”
What does that mean?
That sounds like you’re building-in a little wiggle room there, Joe.
‘“I’m going to be a fact-checker on the floor as I’m debating him,’ he added.”
Yes, please, feel free Sleepy Joe.
Will that “fact checking” apply to yourself as well?
Just keeping it real.
“Pelosi is just the latest high-profile Democrat to offer a major piece of advice to the former vice president.”
“Republicans pointed to Pelosi’s remarks as another sign that Democrats are trying to hide Biden.”
“Hide Biden?”
Really?
I think we all understand that Sleepy Joe has been relegated exclusively to his basement by now.
“Debates have been an issue of contention for weeks as the Trump campaign has pushed for an additional early debate to coincide with early voting that will be underway in states.”
It does make sense to have at least one debate before people can vote…, that is, if not afraid to debate in the first place.
“And the idea of abandoning debates all together made headlines after a New York Times op-ed earlier this August argued that presidential debates should be ‘scrapped,’ with critics suggesting that it’s the latest effort by the media to prevent Biden from debating Trump.”
“Pelosi made the comment at her weekly news conference, unprompted, and her advice was not in response to a question about debates. She cited Trump’s ‘disgraceful’ performance at the 2016 debate when he was ‘stalking’ Clinton as one reason Biden should break tradition and sit out the debates.”
If you watch that debate, the claim that President Trump was “stalking” Hillary, was completely and only imagined by Mrs. Clinton…, then regurgitated by ignorant democrats and their fake news media friends.
“So, I think that he’ll probably act in a way that is beneath the dignity of the presidency; he does that every day,’ Pelosi said of Trump. ‘But I think it will also belittle what the debates are supposed to be about. And they’re not to be about skullduggery on the part of somebody who has no respect for the office he holds, much less the democratic process.’”
‘“Why else would he try to undermine the elections in the manner in which he is doing?’ Pelosi continued. ‘So, if Joe Biden asked me what I thought about it, [I’d say] I don’t think that he should dignify that conversation with Donald Trump.’”
The only problem is, Sleepy Joe’s wife, Jill Biden, already declared her man “would be there for the debates.”
And Sleepy Joe, himself, has said, “I can hardly wait to debate Trump.”
“Shortly after Pelosi’s comments, the Biden campaign responded that while they agree with the speaker’s characterization of Trump, Biden will go through with the debates as planned.
“The Biden campaign already agreed in June to three debates in September and October in a letter to the Commission on Presidential Debates, in addition to a vice-presidential debate.”
‘“We certainly agree with Speaker Pelosi on her views of the President’s behavior,’ Biden campaign spokesperson Andrew Bates said. ‘But just as she has powerfully confronted that behavior in the Oval Office and the Cabinet Room, Joe Biden looks forward to doing the same on the debate stage.’”
That’s good to hear, and that’s tough talk…, but talk is talk, and talk is cheap.
We’ll see.
“The first debate is scheduled for [Tuesday] Sept. 29.”
I’ll definitely be watching…, if Sleepy Joe actually shows up.
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article. From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.
We’re all entitled to our opinions. I value yours and your feedback as well.
Calling the democrats’ latest “coronavirus relief legislation” “The Heroes Act” is a disingenuous disgrace.
A more befitting name would be “The Bend Over Act!”
Nancy Pelosi and all of her anti-American cohorts are definitely not letting this crisis go to waste.
They apparently intend on trying to take full advantage of it in the name of coronavirus relief.
This is definitely one of those “wolf in sheep’s clothing” kind of deals.
According to Robyn Shapiro, on the Economic Liberties website, ‘“This bill delivers charity in place of justice, and Congress should vote it down,’ said Economic Liberties’ Executive Director Sarah Miller. ‘While the need for humanitarian assistance is urgent…, [it] doesn’t address the roll-up of power happening throughout the economy that results in systemic exploitation of workers, consumers, small businesses, taxpayers, and communities.”
“The bill…, bails out corporate lobbyists and corrupt mortgage servicers. It funnels money to monopolistic insurance company executives. And it has no constraints on private equity firms currently using public money from the Federal Reserve to cherry pick corporate assets on the cheap.”
“Our economy is being restructured whether we like it or not,’ added Miller.”
“Problematic provisions in the bill include:”
“A Corporate Lobbyist Bailout: The bill makes Paycheck Protection Program funds available to 501(c)6 trade associations, which is the institutional vehicle for corporate lobbying.”
“A Dark Money Group Bailout: The bill extends Paycheck Protection Program funds available to 501(c)4 trade associations, which is the institutional vehicle for dark money political spending.”
“Tax Cut for the Wealthy: This bill includes a repeal of the State and Local Tax Deduction, which primarily benefits the wealthy.”
Yes, this provision primarily benefits states and cities with extremely high taxes, such as New York, California and Illinois. Oh, and what a coincidence…, these are all blue states through and through.
“Bailout of Mortgage Providers: This bill extends Federal aid to mortgage providers, who were the thinly capitalized entities at fault for the foreclosure crisis. These providers have fought attempts at reform of their industry to make their business safer and are now demanding a no-strings-attached bailout.”
Oh, yes, please…, let’s not forget to “bailout” all of our impoverished mortgage providers! Excuse me please while I go throw up!
“Subsidies for Health Insurance Monopolies.”
Insurance companies…, another group of money grubbers, who should be the last ones to get any help from anyone…, much less the very people they screw on a regular basis…, the taxpayers!
So, let’s quickly recap those beneficiaries of “The Heroes Act,” of which we are so fond: lobbyists, mortgage providers, insurance companies and elitist and wealthy liberals.
And these “problematic provisions in the bill” are just the tip of the iceberg.
According to Lisa Mascaro of the Associated Press, in the Philadelphia Examiner, “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi unveiled a more than $3 trillion coronavirus aid package Tuesday, providing nearly $1 trillion for states and cities [including $915 billion in flexible aid which can be spent for any purpose], “hazard pay” for essential workers and a new round of cash payments to individuals.”
So, 33% of all of this money would go to states and cities.
‘“We must think big, for the people now,’ Pelosi said from the speaker’s office at the Capitol. She said, ‘Not acting is the most expensive course.’”
Ya…, we know what “people” you’re talking about, and it ain’t “We The People!”
“The bill will offer a fresh round of $1,200 direct cash aid to individuals, increased to up to $6,000 per household, and launches a $175 billion housing assistance fund (5.8%) to help pay rents and mortgages.”
According to the Tax Foundation.org website, that would amount to $667 billion – $915 billion.
That’s less…, way less than a third of the relief money here.
Be still my heart!
Some of us will be lucky enough to get $1,200. Woohoo! Please Nancy…, throw down a few more crumbs to all of us peons.
Oh, and new “housing assistance fund!” How exactly does someone get some of that money and what hoops must one jump through to get it?
So, we’ve got a trillion dollars going to states and cities, somewhere south of a trillion going to the crumb crunchers…, which leaves over a trillion to go where?
“It [the bill] adds a 15% increase for food stamps, and for businesses, it provides an employee retention tax credit,” if your business is fortunate enough to survive at all.
“There’s $200 billion (6.7%) in ‘hazard pay’ for essential workers [in] the front lines of the crisis.”
I really have a hard time seeing any of our truly “essential workers” ever getting any of this money.
“There are other new resources, including $25 billion for the U.S. Postal Service.”
There is $10 billion allocated for the 2020 Census.
And $10 billion set aside for the National Endowment for the Arts.
Hey…, artists can get the virus too you know!
“For the November election, the bill provides $3.6 billion to help local officials prepare for the challenges of voting during the pandemic.” This translates to $3.6 billion to push for voting by mail.
“The popular Payroll Protection Program, which has been boosted in past bills, would see another $10 billion to ensure under-served businesses and nonprofit organizations have access to grants through a disaster loan program.”
So, for all of the struggling small businesses, the democrats only allocate $10 billion, or 0.3%.
Wow…, what a relief!
“For hospitals and other health care providers, there’s another $100 billion (3.3%) infusion to help cover costs and additional help for hospitals serving low-income communities.”
“There’s another $600 million in funding to tackle the issue of rapid spread of the virus in state and federal prisons.”
Is this really a $600 million problem?
This “Heroes Act” spends a lot of time covering the concerns of illegal immigrants, amnesty for said illegal immigrants, concerns about legal immigrants, and especially those in the medical field…, even though many of the current doctors and nurses are being furloughed from their jobs.
Then we have all of the concern surrounding marijuana…, an integral part of coronavirus relief!
The word “cannabis” is mentioned 68 times in this legislation.
Really?
“Covid-19” is mentioned only 24 times!
In any regard, this “Heroes Act” can be found in all of its glory out on the doc.house.gov website. Check it out for yourself.
So, to our list of favorite beneficiaries of “The Heroes Act,” which already contains: lobbyists, mortgage providers, insurance companies and elitist and wealthy liberals…, let’s add: irresponsible state and city liberal governments,
I’m not kidding about any of this.
“Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer warned that if [President] Trump and congressional Republicans ‘slow walk’ more aid they will be repeating President Herbert Hoover’s ‘tepid’ response to the Great Depression.”
Sure Chucky! We all remember President Hoover!
NOT!
And not many of us can relate to The Great Depression either.
I don’t think The President or the republicans have any problem with any real “aid” regarding the coronavirus situation…, it’s all the other garbage they have an issue with.
‘“To those who would suggest a pause, I would say the hunger doesn’t take a pause, the rent doesn’t take a pause,’ Pelosi said late Monday on MSNBC. ‘We have a big need. It’s monumental.’”
Thank you for all of your hollow and underhanded words as well, Nancy.
The only this “monumental” here is the monumental nature of your idiotic, socialistic, desires.
If you’d like to see my suggestion for some REAL coronavirus relief, check out my blog from May 5, 2020, titled, “If we’re going to hand money out, let’s REALLY hand some money out!”
I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article. From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.
This underlying belief is why we have never “shut down” the world before because of “the flu.”
But now we have established a precedent.
Do we really intend on “shutting down” the world every year or every other year?
Since when do we quarantine the healthy and the sick?
Tyler Olson of Fox News reports that, “Defensive Dems scold coronavirus lockdown protesters as rallies spread across country.”
“As protests spread against the stay-at-home orders put in place by governors across the country, some prominent Democrats have panned the demonstrations as dangerous and ill-informed, saying the protesters risk spreading coronavirus among themselves and contributing to a spike in cases in their states.”
How typically elitist of you to scold these protesters who were not sanctioned by the liberal hierarchy.
But, remember…, the cure can’t be worse than the disease itself.
What would be worse…, losing your business, losing your job, losing your home, losing a place to live, losing all of your money and having to depend on charity to eat…, or possibly getting a flu that has a 98.5% survivability rate? Which is about the same rate as every other flu that’s come down the pike?
“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., addressed the protesters in an interview on ‘Fox News Sunday’ with Chris Wallace.”
‘“No, not really,’ she said when asked if she understood why people are demonstrating. ‘…I’m respectful [of] whatever people think they should say, but the fact is this has to be science-based, evidence-based, data-based.’”
Of course, she can’t understand why people are demonstrating!
She hasn’t lost her job!
I mean, she’s been in Congress for the last 100 years!
She’s still getting paid.
Her family’s livelihood isn’t being threatened.
And all of her supporters are still receiving their government checks on schedule.
She’s got enough of cash in her big fat bank accounts, just like all of her other elitist friends, to hold her over for years.
“Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer on MSNBC last week said that the protests against her stay-at-home order may lead her to extend the order, due to the fact so many people could have been exposed to the coronavirus.”
Why don’t you just get it over with and extend your order until 2022?
That way you’ll be sure to be safe from the virus…, right?
There’ll be nothing left of the state of Michigan, but you will have saved lives…, at least from the virus.
Remember…, the cure can’t be worse than the disease itself!
‘“When you see a political rally, that’s what it was yesterday, a political rally like that where people aren’t wearing masks and they’re in close quarters and they’re touching one another … the odds are very high that they’re spreading COVID-19 along with it,’ she said. ‘So it’s that kind of irresponsible action that puts us in this situation where we might have to actually think about extending stay-at-home orders, which is supposedly what they’re protesting.’”
On a side note…, please remember that protesters are only deemed “political” when they are in disagreement with the liberal policies. Sunday, Washington Democratic Gov. Jay Inslee explicitly said the protests were ‘illegal.’”
If I’m not mistaken, Jay, the right to protest is protected by The Constitution…, regardless of any orders you may be laying down.
Remember…, the cure can’t be worse than the disease itself.
“The anti-stay-at-home order protests are often largely made up of supporters of the president, waving Trump flags and wearing ‘Make America Great Again’ hats. The governors of Michigan, Minnesota and Virginia are also all Democrats.”
Oh…, I’m sure that every single one of the protesters are Trump supporters.
What a disingenuous statement.
I’m sure there are quite a few democrats who also see the harm that some of these extended stay-at-home orders could cause.
“In addition to those states, rallies have also made their way to New York, Ohio, North Carolina, Kentucky and more.”
“Governors of both parties have cautioned against lifting social distancing measures too soon and too completely…”
“[President] Trump’s plan to reopen the economy similarly does so in phases, ‘one careful step at a time.’”
“But Democrats have been more forceful in their rhetoric, not just against protesters but also by keeping states closed.”
AGAIN…, THE CURE CAN’T BE WORSE THAN THE DISEASE ITSELF!
I value your feedback and I’d love to hear from you!
If you’re not already “following” me and you liked my blog(s) today, please “click” on the comment icon just to the right of the date at the bottom of this article. From there you can let me know if you “like” my blog, leave a comment or click the white “FOLLOW” button at the bottom of that page, which will keep you up to date on all of my latest posts.
Mr. Erickson Rules! 