“Look, some people are just sore losers.” – Hillary Clinton, prior to losing the election. BINGO!

During one of the presidential debates, back in October of 2016, Republican nominee Donald Trump explained that he would “look” at the election results before accepting and conceding the presidency to his opponent. He said this due to concerns about potential voter fraud.

At hearing this, Hillary was soooo offended, and mortified, that Mr. Trump would actually consider questioning the results of the election. Of course, at this point, the biased mainstream media was telling us there was no way Trump could win. “Trump has no path to victory,” was one of their talking points that was repeated on a daily basis.

And here are some of Hillary’s own words in response to Mr. Trump’s honest remarks about his concerns with the election results:

“Failure to accept the election results is a direct threat to our democracy.”

“To say you won’t respect the result of the election, that is a direct threat to our democracy.”

“Look, some people are just sore losers.”

And of course, the biased mainstream media immediately jumped on the “outraged” bandwagon, along with the rest of “the swamp.”

“How dare Donald Trump not accept the election results!”

“Donald Trump is a threat to democracy!”

“Donald Trump must accept the will of the people.”

THIS ALL CHANGED ON NOVEMBER 9, 2016.

The very next day the unabashed hypocrisy began.

“Determining a president based on the Electoral College is a sham!”

“Russia interfered with the outcome of our election!”

And for the last year it has been one thing after another, as “the swamp” continues to try to undermine and discredit President Trump.  The rallying cry of the democrats is “RESIST!”

Remember Hillary’s own words, “Failure to accept the election results is a direct threat to our democracy.” That is, unless the liberal candidate loses, I guess.

Yes, “the swamp” is “…a direct threat to our democracy.”

hillary hypocrite 2

 

“If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?” “If a ‘talking head’ on CNN is spreading Fake News, is anyone really aware of it?”

It is pretty much an accepted fact now that the mainstream media has a fairly strong left-leaning bias. The question is, how many people are they potentially effecting in reality?

Let’s take a look at the numbers.

The population of The United States is currently 327 million people.

Based on the latest Nielsen Media Research ratings, here are the ratings of news related programming –

Nightly network news:

NBC           7.85 million viewers, or 2.4% of the population (this is a little less than than the population of New York City)

ABC           7.5   million viewers

CBS           6.2    million viewers

Total of  21.55  million viewers, or 6.6 % of the population.  This is roughly the population State of Florida.

Prime time cable news shows:

FOX          2.2  million viewers (about the population of Houston, TX)

MSNBC    1.8  million viewers

Total of    4    million viewers, or 1.2% of the population.  This is roughly the population of the state of Oklahoma.

Daily cable totals (other than prime time):

FOX           1.3  million viewers, or less than 1% of the population.

(about the population of Dallas, TX)

MSNBC    1.0   million viewers

CNN            .83  million viewers (830,000 viewers, about the population of Charlotte, NC)

So, based on these numbers, you can see that overall, less than 8.5% of us are getting any kind of “news” or information from the mainstream media.

The biased mainstream media obviously over-values its own worth, and its own ability of disseminate information of any kind.      

When a commentator on CNN says something, 99.998% of the American people will probably never know about it!

So, to answer the question from the title, “If a ‘talking head’ on CNN is spreading Fake News, is anyone really aware of it?” The answer is no, not really.

wheel-of-fake-news-ben-garrison-cartoon

 

How President Trump’s character is being attacked…by the numbers.

By definition, “Character assassination is a deliberate and sustained process that attempts to destroy the credibility and reputation of a person.”

The perpetrators of character assassinations employ a mix of open and covert methods to achieve their goals, such as raising false accusations, planting and fostering rumors, manipulating information, exaggeration, creating misleading half-truths, or manipulating facts to present a desired picture of the targeted person in an attempt to tarnish that person’s reputation.

Here is the character assassination playbook by the numbers:

  • Attack their expertise, questioning their qualifications or experience
  • Criticize their physical appearance or dress
  • Comment on their inability to make a good argument
  • Point out their inexperience and junior status
  • Attack their values as being contrary to social norms
  • Interpret a minor error as major
  • Attach them to other discredited people

Does any of this sound like the treatment President Trump has been receiving from the democrats and their friends, the biased mainstream media? Of course it does.  “The swamp” is just so obvious these days.  They have no interest in even pretending to be the littlest bit fair anymore.

“In practice, character assassination may involve doublespeak, spreading of rumors, innuendo or deliberate misinformation on topics relating to the subject’s morals, integrity, and reputation. It may involve spinning information that is technically true, but that is presented in a misleading manner or is presented without the necessary context. For example, it might be said that a person refused to pay any income tax during a specific year, without saying that no tax was actually owed per the tax laws.”

In other words, the truth of the allegations is irrelevant. The only thing that is important is the promotion of the negative perception in the minds of the public.

Perhaps the most common form of character assassination is the spread of allegations that the person is a liar. I’ve never heard that said about President Trump.  Have you?

Other common themes may include allegations about members of the candidate’s family, bad spousal relationships, or a lack of respect by colleagues.

Another theme claims that the person routinely engages in disturbing, socially unacceptable behavior, such as sexual deviancy. The person may also be portrayed as holding beliefs widely considered despicable within society, such as supporting racism or other forms of bigotry. This one is especially liked by the democrats and the biased mainstream media!

Clarence Thomas’ nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States in 1991 and Herman Cain’s run for president in 2012 are excellent examples of prior character assassination.

“In a totalitarian regime, for example: various kingdoms, North Korea, Cuba under Castro, Iraq under Saddam Hussein, and The Soviet Union, “The effect of a character assassination driven by an individual is not equal to that of a state-driven campaign. The state-sponsored destruction of reputations, fostered by political propaganda and cultural mechanisms, can have more far-reaching consequences. One of the earliest signs of a society’s compliance to loosening the reins on the perpetration of crimes with total impunity is when a government favors or directly encourages a campaign aimed at destroying the dignity and reputation of its adversaries, and the public accepts its allegations without question. The mobilization toward ruining the reputation of adversaries is the prelude to the mobilization of violence in order to annihilate them. Official dehumanization has always preceded the actual physical assault of the victims.”

Do you remember someone saying, “I’ve actually thought about blowing up the White House?” I’m sure you do.

Do you also remember the biased mainstream media or the political left denouncing this comment?  I’m sure you don’t, because they didn’t.

And there have been other dehumanizing remarks made about President Trump by various democrats, Hollywood, and other left-leaning individuals, while the biased mainstream media chooses to look the other way.

Note: Portions of this article come from information provided by The International Society for the Study of Character Assassination (ISSCA). Yes, there is such a thing!  The ISSCA specializes in the academic study and research of how character attacks and assassinations have been executed in both history and during contemporary times.  The ISSCA formed in 2011, and the group included historians, political scientists, and political psychologists from around the world.

Real-Collusion-600-LI

 

 

 

The biased mainstream media have been losing their minds over Michael Wolff’s new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House.”

It’s amazing how the biased mainstream media is promoting and expounding on every negative claim it can garner from this book.

Below is a short list of books that have been written about Barack Obama and the Clintons, which are also critical in nature.

Have you seen the biased mainstream media spend ANY time at all discussing ANY of these books?

The answer is NO. That’s why “We the People” call them the BIASED mainstream media, and FAKE NEWS.

“Every veil secretly desires to be lifted, except the veil of hypocrisy.” – Richard Garnett

The Worst President in History: The Legacy of Barack Obama

 The Case Against Barack Obama: The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media’s Favorite Candidate

Trust Betrayed: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and the Selling Out of America’s National Security

 The Price of the Ticket: Barack Obama and Rise and Decline of Black Politics

 Obama’s Empty Promises Vanished Hopes: An Analytical Review of a President’s Policy Failures

Hope Is Not a Strategy: Leadership Lessons from the Obama Presidency

 Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich

A Washington Tragedy: Bill & Hillary Clinton and the Suicide of Vincent Foster

 Hillary’s Scheme: Inside the Next Clinton’s Ruthless Agenda to Take the White House

 Crisis of Character: A White House Secret Service Officer Discloses His Firsthand Experience with Hillary, Bill, and How They Operate

The Clinton Record: Everything Bill and Hillary Want You to Forget

 Hell to Pay: The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton

The Truth About Hillary

The Secret Life of Bill Clinton: The Unreported Stories

 Trust Betrayed: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and the Selling Out of America’s National Security

hyprocrisy

 

Oh what a tangled, and radioactive, web they weave!

Please remember that the parties involved in these money grabbing schemes try to make things as complicated and as convoluted as they possibly can. It is all designed to afford them “plausible deniability,” “plausible ineptitude,” and “claims of implausible complexity and conspiracy.”

I’ll do my best at trying to make this all as understandable as possible. Here we go!

During Obama’s time in the White House, and while Hillary was still the Secretary of State, Russia had been plotting, and successfully so, to secure U.S. government approval for its acquisition of a Canadian company named Uranium One (which has operations in Australia, Canada, Kazakhstan, South Africa and the United States), and with it, tens of billions of dollars in U.S. uranium reserves.

The Clintons were monetarily taking advantage of their political influence, as usual, and the Obama administration (a relative rookie in this arena, compared to the Clintons) was knowingly compromising American national-security interests. The administration approved the transfer of control of over one-fifth of American uranium-mining capacity to Russia, and specifically to Russia’s state-controlled nuclear-energy conglomerate, Rosatom.

Why would they do this? What was in it for the U.S.?  Our government is supposed to be representing “We the People,” not their own self interests.

Making matters worse, at the time the administration approved the transfer, it knew that Rosatom’s American subsidiary (Tenam, USA) was engaged in a very profitable racketeering scheme that had already committed felony extortion, fraud, and money-laundering offenses. All well-documented by our wonderful FBI, then headed by Robert Mueller by the way. And now Mueller is looking into collusion with the Russians?  Do you own a mirror Mr. Mueller?

The Obama administration also knew that congressional Republicans were trying to stop the transfer. (What about the democrats? Whose side are they on anyway?)  As a result, the Obama Justice Department concealed what it knew. The Obama Department of Justice allowed the racketeering enterprise to continue, compromising the American uranium industry rather than commencing a prosecution that would have halted the transfer. DOJ prosecutors then waited four years, which enabled them to plead down the case, which was a violation of Justice Department charging guidelines by the way, thus letting their partners in crime basically off the hook.  In the meantime, the administration refused to cooperate with Congress, and reportedly threatened an informant who wanted to go public right in the middle of Hillary’s presidential run.

When President Obama came into power, the Russian official in charge of Tenam USA was Vadim Mikerin. Mikerin was responsible for arranging and managing Rosatom’s contracts with American uranium purchasers. This gave him tremendous leverage over the U.S. companies. To further the Kremlin’s push for nuclear-energy expansion, he had been seeking to retain a lobbyist, from whom he planned to extort kickbacks, just as he did with the U.S. energy companies. With the help of an associate connected to Russian organized-crime groups, Mikerin found his lobbyist. The man’s name has not been disclosed, but he contacted the FBI, after he began to be concerned about the lawfulness of his involvement, and revealed what he knew. From then on, the FBI and Obama’s Justice Department permitted him to participate in the Russian racketeering scheme as a “confidential source,” and he is thus known as “CS-1” in affidavits the government, years later, presented to federal court in order to obtain search and arrest warrants. There, the U.S. attorney was Obama appointee Rod Rosenstein, now President Trump’s deputy attorney general! And he is the man who appointed Mueller as special counsel to investigate Trump!

You can’t make this stuff up!

It must be hard investigating President Trump while tripping over piles of evidence against themselves and all of their crooked “friends!”

In 2005, former President Clinton helped his Canadian billionaire friend and benefactor, Frank Giustra, obtain coveted uranium-mining rights from Kazakhstan’s dictator. The Kazakh deal enabled Giustra’s company (Ur-Asia Energy) to merge into Uranium One (a South African company), a $3.5 billion windfall. Giustra and his partners thereafter contributed tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation. (Hmmm, now why would they do that?!) Besides the valuable Kazakh reserves, Uranium One also controlled about a fifth of the uranium stock in the United States.

(Note: The United States gets a fifth of its electrical power from nuclear energy, but only produces a fifth of the uranium it needs.)

Furthermore, the Obama administration, which included Hillary, massaged deals involving their donors’ interests in Uranium One, made sure this whole scandal never saw the light of day, which would have jeopardized Hillary’s presidential run, and protected their friend, Mr. Vadim Mikerin, from a serious amount jail time. This is why Mikerin took the plea deal and waived his right to appeal, sparing the Obama administration a full public airing of the facts.

Coincidentally, the Obama DOJ’s Fraud Section was then run by Andrew Weissmann, who is now one of the top prosecutors in Robert Mueller’s ongoing special-counsel investigation of Trump’s supposed collusion with Russia!

Again, you can’t make this stuff up!

I’m sure that Mueller and his team must sit around and laugh from time to time at the utter hypocrisy, irony and the travesty of their so-called “investigation.”

Just remember, if Donald Trump had not won the election, none of us would have ever known anything about any of this stuff, and The Clinton Foundation would still be going strong. Hillary losing the election was definitely not part of the plan.

Hopefully this is all a little clearer for you. At least as clear as mud!

Thank you to Andrew C. McCarthy for contributing portions of the information referred to in this editorial.

uranium one resized

 

 

This Apple is full of worms!

Shame on you Apple! First, shame on you for what you did, then shame on you for your lame apology, lame explanation, and for treating us all like idiots.

Apple admitted that, “…we (Apple) sometimes reduced processor speeds on iPhones with aging batteries as a way to balance performance and battery life,” and that they could have been, “… more transparent with our customers regarding how exactly iOS manages battery and performance.”

(Translation: Sales of new phones started to lag and upper management came up with this bright idea to “nudge” customers into upgrading their phones to the latest version, but we got busted, and we should have been smarter about how we did this.)

Apple says, “We have never, and would never, do anything to intentionally shorten the life of any Apple product, or degrade the user experience to drive customer upgrades.”

Ohhhh nooooo, of course they wouldn’t do that! How dare we even think that! You just “degraded our user experience” because that’s what was best for us?!

Who does Apple think they are? Barack Obama? Hillary Clinton? The IRS? You can’t get away with lying straight to all of our faces just because that was the only option you had. You obviously could not admit what you were doing, so the only option was to bs us and deny any wrong doing.

Apple says it is going to release an iOS update early next year that’ll give users more info on the health of their iPhone’s battery so they can see if its condition is affecting phone performance.

Uh, hello Apple, we’re not idiots. We know what batteries do. We understand that things don’t run as well when our batteries are low and that they don’t run at all when our batteries are dead.

I might be mistaken, but won’t running your battery monitoring program actually suck more life out of our battery?

If Apple wasn’t doing anything wrong, why would they feel the need to create the reduced price battery replacement program?

We may learn more about this situation after the lawsuit Apple was hit with moves through the courts, but then again we may not. Money has a way of being able to cloud the truth.

Look for a settlement and more lame explanations.

Hey, it’s the American way.

applesucks2

The biased mainstream media strikes again!

 

Who of us hasn’t recently heard quotes like these from the typical cast of characters in the biased mainstream media, like CNN, Newsweek, NBC, CNBC, MSNBC, among others?

“According to recent polls, President Trump is the least popular president ever!”

“President Trumps’ approval ratings are historically low!”

“No other president has had approval ratings this low after only his first year in office!”

It’s funny, because I don’t remember hearing anything like this after President Obama’s first year in office. The truth is Barack Obama and President Trump have at least one thing in common: identical approval and disapproval ratings in one national poll (the most unbiased national poll) after their first year in office.

Rasmussen Reports’ latest poll (12/28/17) showed that President Trump has a 46% approval rating compared to a 53% disapproval figure, which were near the same percentages Obama received at the end of 2009, his first year in office.

Indeed, Obama polled at 46% approval and 54% disapproval in Rasmussen’s December 31, 2009, results, according to its historical index of the 44th president’s ratings.

Once again we find that the biased mainstream media’s “reporting” is based more on wishful thinking than the actual facts.

Once again we find that the biased mainstream media is pushing a propagandist narrative for the liberal democrats, better known as FAKE NEWS.

Buckle your seatbelts ladies and gentlemen, because it is only going to get worse.

Thank God for Fox News and social media. With them President Trump and “We the People” at least have a fighting chance against “the swamp.”

president-trump-has-a-100-approval-rating-unum-mine-13325321

 

What happens when the investigators need to be investigated?

After more than a year of lying, denials, pleading the fifth, and downright ignoring Congress’ subpoenas for information, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), and even the FBI, now stand exposed as the funders of that fraudulent dossier which alleged years of collusion between the Kremlin and Donald Trump.

All of this raises many disturbing questions, plus the realization that if anyone colluded with Moscow, it was Hillary and her hit squad.

The Washington Post reported that Clinton and the DNC paid millions to an international law firm, Perkins Coie, which in turn hired Fusion GPS (which is basically an arm of the democrat party, that is used to “research and investigate” its clients’ “opposition”) to “investigate” Trump. (I personally believe they hired them to produce a piece of fiction that met their narrative as a means of justification for Obama’s administration to “spy” on the Trump campaign.)

Fusion GPS then hired Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer who compiled the 35-page dossier containing information he claimed came from Russian government and intelligence officials.

Fusion GPS has been stonewalling Congress’ efforts to get to the bottom of this, with company officials taking the Fifth Amendment.

The FBI has also been resisting congressional subpoenas as well for information on its role in the whole matter. (Note: FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe just recently decided to retire early after finally making himself available to Congressional questioning.  I have a feeling he won’t be the last to decide that early retirement is a good option.)

What we had here was a coordinated anti-Trump effort that was contracted and paid for by President Trump’s opponents (This, incredibly enough, included the FBI, and their illegal wiretapping of President Trump and his campaign, which, by the way, “the swamp” collectively laughed at when President Trump made his “wiretapping” claims.)

So now we see that we have the actual Russian colluders (Hillary’s hit squad, which now includes democrat members of Congress and the biased mainstream media, in effect “the swamp”) accusing President Trump of collusion and instigating the whole Trump “collusion” probe.

They say that, “truth is stranger than fiction.” It doesn’t get much sleazier or stranger than this.

Who do we get to investigate the investigators?

My vote goes to Trey Gowdy, a Republican Congressman from South Carolina.  He is a former federal prosecutor, and his nickname is “the bulldog.”

Let’s set him up as a special prosecutor, like Robert Mueller is now, and let him go nuts. Now that is something I would pay to see!

hillary evidence

Three things you will NEVER hear the FBI say…unless you’re Hillary Clinton.

One – “Well, you committed about a dozen felonies, but I can tell you didn’t really intend to, so we’re gonna give you the benefit of the doubt.”

Two – “We’re going to interview you regarding potential illegal activity, but not record anything that is said. That way you won’t get in any trouble just in case you inadvertently say something you shouldn’t.”

Three – “There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those with whom she was corresponding about those matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.”

Say what!?  So she’s not even been held to the level of “any reasonable person?”

Ignorance is never an excuse for breaking the law. Just try using it as an excuse sometime, I have, and it doesn’t work…unless of course your name is Hillary Clinton.  In which case you’re not actually ignorant of the law, you’re just pretending to be ignorant of the law, and the people investigating you are pretending like they really care about you breaking the law, which they’re not.

God help you if you’re someone who’s not part of “the swamp.”  In these cases “the law” is revered, it is something that is sacred, and something that comes down like a hammer.

Right, General Flynn? Right, Martha Stewart?  Just to name a couple of the more noteworthy and recognizable examples.

It seems that Lady Justice has been peeking out from under her blindfold quite a bit lately.

hillaryabovethelaw2

47% of American households PAY NO FEDERAL INCOME TAX!

I say “good” for them.  I’m not a big fan of anyone paying taxes.

However, this does begin to pose a bit of a problem.

The problem is that almost half of us aren’t really concerned about federal taxes because we don’t pay any.  We don’t worry about holding our government accountable because most of the 47% aren’t really worried about how our government spends our tax money because it’s not their money.

What do you suppose is going to happen when there are more people not paying taxes than those who are?

That is a very slippery slope that “We the People” cannot afford (and not literally afford) to start heading down.

Once the “receivers” outnumber the “payers,” there will be no end to how much the “receivers” are willing to take from the “payers,” and by that time there will be nothing the “payers” will be able to do about it.

It will be the beginning of the end of the greatest country in the history of the world, and it will be of our own doing.

That is why I believe every American should be required to pay some federal tax.  I don’t care if it’s $5, $10, $50, or $100, but it has to be something.

Every American needs to be invested in our country.

Every American needs to have some skin in the game.

“It’s easy to be wasteful, take risks and bet stupidly when you’re playing with other people’s money.” – Mr. Erickson

paying taxes

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑